Electricity providers are regulated monopolies in most states, price rises are approved by the govt. We still have many major insurance providers but yes if they collude or you dont have choice in a particular area that's a problem.
Google is not a monopoly. There are plenty of choices. You can use Bing or Safari and pay for map services instead of relying on the Google Map THAT THEY PROVIDE FOR FREE.
do not despair, the Ftc chairman Lina khan will absolutely break them up. She has been known to scare other companies into merging, it's why Aldis and Krogers never merged.
While I don't disagree with some of the video's points on mobile devices, Chrome is not the one trying to auto-install itself like Bing and Yahoo as a default browser on desktop.
Does yahoo even do that anymore, and edge being installed automatically on a windows computer is like Samsung internet being installed on a Samsung. The issue is that Google is the default search engine for smashing internet because they payed for it.
No, there's no proof Google is a monopoly, they only control search engines, video content, you name it, and the only competitor in the video content category was only able to grow because it was created in a secluded market in China.
@@tonyoostendorp7754the idea is that the sum of its parts are worth more separately than having them all under one umbrella because certain aspects of the business are more risky than others, and others have higher margins or higher levels of a moat. For example googles cloud computing business would likely trade at a higher P/E multiple than GOOGL stock currently since it’s a higher growth business than their search ad business, in addition to UA-cam likely trading at a premium. Another reason is if the companies are separate then each entity becomes a bit more transparent in financial reporting, known as unbundling.
@@sharpasacueball whats the source for this? Highly depends on the company and google has a lot of unprofitable sectors with their few profitable sectors being advertisement. Also why would people sell google stock on news of breakup? Your right that most companies have benefited but when has a major breakup like this been done besides at&t?
If they break up Google, they will need to break up Microsoft, amazon, and apple. Notice how they said the whole case is that google uses its dominance in one area to succeed in another, its not a level playing field. Same exact thing can be said for the other tech conglomerates. If this goes through we are going to see a massive break up of our largest companies.
@@Hasanaljadid there services business for sure has monopolistic behavior. Use of super apps are banned by apple because they depend less on apples smartphone proprietary software. Limiting their devices to only function in their ecosystem of devices like the apple watch. Apple forces third-party payment services to use its own digital wallet rather than offering their services in separate apps. There are so many monopolistic behaviors apple has going on in its business. In the smartphone industry they have a duopoly with Samsung and maintain this due to them putting compatibility limitations with its products in its ecosystem. At the end of the day if google is broken up, apple should be broken up with all the other monopolistic tech conglomerates.
Indeed, the US government has established that they really don’t care about monopolies. The wort that ever happens is the CEO has to speak to congress and nothing really changes.
Are they really? I use 3 or 4 different engines depending on which device I'm using. They don't feel so different nowadays, so I just choose whichever I find interesting at the moment of configuration. Right now I'm testing Ecosia.
@@ixrkyeah as daily driver only google is decent. However, I use LLM much more now. Google has certainly gone downhill, but it’s still better than the others as a daily driver.
Separating Microsoft’s browser and operating system allowed Google to compete with their browser … Google had new innovations and are the leader today due to that.
no they didn't. They purchased tech with $$$. Google didn't create UA-cam or Android or Maps, these were businesses which were purchased and in so doing, they basically bought up all potential competition. Same with Apple and Adobe.
Bring Julianne Iwersen Niemann on the show. She changed my life Financially I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Julianne Iwersen Niemann, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market.
I appreciate this. After curiously searching her name online and reviewing her credentials, I'm quite impressed. I've contacted her as I could use all the help I can get
The thing is people often doubt the prospects of financial advisors like Julianne Iwersen Niemann in business/markets today. Well it gives me more time to get ahead while they stew in their own pity and doubts as they childishly complain about those spreading the word
@@cy9141it is extremely easy to change the search engine. I don't see why it's a problem that Google is the default. If they made Google the ONLY option then ye, that would be a problem.
Same here, I believe the Bitcoin ETFs approval will be life changing opportunity for us, with my current portfolio of $108,000 from my investments with my personal financial advisor i totally agree with you
YES!!! That's exactly her name (Margaret Emily) so many people have recommended highly about her and am just starting with her, Kairangi from Brisbane Australia..🇦🇺
She is my family' personal Broker and also a personal Broker to many families in the United states, she is a licensed broker and a FINRA AGENT in the United States.🇺🇸
Google isn't the only one that does data harvesting and targeted ads like this. Streaming services, social media, and even your car (if made in the last ~10 years) is tracking and selling your data. You can't escape it now unless you live a pre-internet lifestyle and completely disconnect since all large sites are Web 2 formatted. Gone are the days of Web 1 when we made our own silly websites and chat rooms about your fave hobby.
i spout a lot of hate for Google but i just wish Google would return to being the best, a company becomes a monopoly when the quality of their products no longer correlates to their revenue
Tech is the 1 industry where the more powerful the company the more capable and high quality the tech becomes. Breaking up a tech company won’t raise the ceiling on technological advancements
But the fact is google changed from "not being evil" to being purely that. They should face different lawsuits anyway, but punishments are too low in US. All companies prefer to pay fines rather than comply woth law.
@@mjuy-ur3xn I'm not talking about hardware companies, but yes I like most people on the internet only joined in the 2000s. The number of internet users in 2005 was only around 1 billion, when today it's over 5 billion.
I don't see a monopoly here; consumers have chosen Google, much like how many have chosen Apple's iPhone. If people want a better, more optimized search experience for free, that's their choice. This is just simply outdated antitrust laws. So, I'm not sure why people or the government are complaining. I mean there is Bing out there if you want to use it.
So if you want me to make you understand how to make profit from this tradition platform then just reply my comment and I will tell you it just to show you the right trading platform which I have been using to help others
Just register/move the company to a different country, case closed. They might incur financial losses due to taxations, but at least they'll save the company and it's vision.
The fact that Epic Games plays such a central role in attacking the "tolls" Google and Apple take for their services show that you need power to break power. Over time, an unregulated industry will always get worse. That's why we need good, honest government regulations here.
@9:12 Railroad barrons and steel manufacturers have completely disappeared from America. Looking back now, how I wish there is accessible mass transportation like trains and manufacturing jobs like those provided by steel factories in the USA. America shot itself in the foot by meddling in free market. 😢
No, America reduced the tariffs for products made overseas. Enough so that the setup costs moving production was cheaper than keeping production. This is America staying out of the free market
The problem with breaking up Google along departmental lines is that the profitable departments (ad services) would still be printing money as the dominant player in the industry, while their subsidized departments that deliver the services people use (like UA-cam, Google Drive, and to a lesser extent Google Search) would likely go bankrupt. So, we'd lose so much data, and still end up with a massive advertising monopoly. I'm not saying the status quo is tenable or right. I'm saying that structurally, our economic policies and legal options aren't designed for the kind of world we now live in. No corporation should own this much of our daily lives, but by applying existing remedies, we'd be blowing off our kneecaps to try and cure cancer.
Місяць тому
Blackrock, State Street, and Vanguard should be BROKEN up!
Im for Google, there is no other big company that actually shares its funds with people like youtubers and offers free and reliable products. Every big tech company collects data. Id rather it be Google
I understand Google being the default search engine on Android phones since Google owns and develops Android. Them paying Apple $20B goes to show how much more money they make out of the data that they collect.
We need to discuss capitalism. Our country celebrates building a company from the ground up, and that's what Google did in the early 2000s. Now they're so big signing agreements, not forcing other companies to take their money, but enting into agreements to become the default search engine on devices and other platforms. This should be a celebration of the success of a company. Not talking about breaking them up. We also need to discuss antitrust laws. Isn't antitrust hypocritical to capitalism?
- Isn't antitrust hypocritical to capitalism? The answer is a resounding no. When a corporation becomes too powerful and swallows up all its competition, then it is no longer a free market. Just as Standard Oil was broken up into smaller companies, Big Tech and other "Big" companies must be broken up.If they are not broken up, we will no longer have capitalism, but rather the consolidation of a neo-feudal system with large techno-feudal lords.
It sounds like you're talking about Laissez-faire capitalism which has never been successful anywhere. Any system turned into an ideology, and taken to its most extreme tends to lose sight of its original reasons for being. What we want is an efficient allocation of capital, which requires the ability for new competitors to rise, because we know that drives innovation, productivity, economic growth etc. Capitalism should be thought of as a tool not an ideology, and like any system (such as a sports league), it works best when regulated to keep the desired outcomes on track. So is intervention antithetical to capitalism? Yes but it's not antithetical to the reasons America adopted a mixed economy with a capitalist component in the first place.
You really don’t understand that this isn’t a free market or capitalism anymore. We are entering late stage capitalism. We the ppl are truly screwed and I can’t help but feel like part of the problem. I work in private equity and before that i was in VC and ib. We’ve allowed the big guys to destroy any chance of companies competing especially start ups. So many times we would take on a small startup just so a fortune 1000 could come in and snuff them out via an acquisition. Nothing is going to happen. Politicians are bought and paid for.
The funniest thing in this video are the thought that Duck Duck Go is a relevant search engine (its not) and that Epic Games will pass the savings to customers if the Google Play store fees is reduced (they wont) 🤣
For epic games - keeping the status quo of a parasite on ppl creating the actual apps and games is unacceptable and can’t be maintained. Something must be done
Well that's just it. Other search engines CANT be relevant precisely because of Google monopolist behaviour. If not prevented from doing so, a lot of people would easily opt for a decent search engine that doesn't steal their data. In Epic's case your argument is a lot weaker because Epic has none-mobile platforms as well yet prices across both mobile and non-mobile are standardised. Meaning Google(and Apple) fees mean they make less on mobile than console/PC. Whether or not the standardised prices are artificially inflated to cover their losses on mobile is another question entirely.
Remember askjeeves? Bing? The one with the spider? Even yahoo and Bing are relatively unknown. Once the 90s ended Google took over and the old internet was over.
Ran Pauls statement was more outrageous. No proof of google being a monopoly. Yeah that's why marketing courses literally teach how to use google, and it's not even limited to search engines they control video content as well, violating free speech rights by censoring youtube as well, how the hell can that guy make such a statement without having tomatoes thrown at him. UA-cam has been a monopoly for DECADES and the only competitior that was able to emerge was created in a distached market in China, literally proving my point, Tik Tok only still exists because Google couldn't touch their market in China.
What about Microsoft? They have monopoly in operating system, productivity apps ,AI and ,cloud. Their dominance in os and productivity app like office and excel and ERPs give them edge in cloud industry
1. Windows is an open platform. Microsoft solved their antitrust issues regarding this in the 90s. 2. It's not a monopoly, Apple exists in the home computer market. (Again, nowhere near as dominant as in the 90s) 3. Google, Apple, and dozens of others have taken significant share of the 'productivity apps' space. Microsoft is nowhere near as dominant as they were in the 90s (where they didn't need to break up because of the positive changes they made) 4. Amazon has more cloud marketshare than Microsoft.
The video is about Google. Microsoft having a monopoly doesn't make change anything about Google having one, too. And if you watched the video, they mentioned Microsoft's illegal monopoly.
And let's not forget bill gates is buying all the farmland in America. That's a food monopoly waiting to happen. Nevermind the water rights he's taking from everyone else. None of it should be legal.
who does NOT use Google? all this is for the convenience of the consumer, that does NOT pay for all these great Google features. Google gives this access for FREE. that is not a monopoly.
@abhishekkulkarni2918 that's just a buzz phrase. So what if they show you an ad. They didn't make you click it or buy something without your will. This whole thing so stupid.
We had a very generic business name that included the core product. We were at the forefront of online searches due to this. A visit from a rep of these crooks with the offer of top listing for $5000 a month was rebuffed. Already page 1 so why pay? Within a fortnight we were page 8.
I don’t care about other tech companies becoming too big at this point in time I just want to be able to afford my medicine. The government should go after the pharmaceutical industry, but they don’t because those companies support the political parties.
If not for anti-trust prosecution, we may not have seen small innovative companies have a chance to grow. IBM facing monopoly suit gave rise to DEC, Microsoft. Microsoft monopoly suit gave rise to Google. Google suit gives rise to ....?
Google trying to appeal means breaking google is not just necessary but also can teach companies to see a vrry good example of what can happen to avoid the same problem.. Google is becoming insensitive at this point instead of doing better
I honestly think Elon Musk's XAI33x is the safest bet for long term hold, and will survive out of every other altcoins. It will get adopted in US, Ecuador, Asia, starting from Japan, and slowly spread out and gain. This is a winning coin, apart from all the technical greatness.
Is it all that big a deal? I say don’t break them up. Let them churn out everything they can. I personally don’t have a vendetta on the data privacy thing, from any of the tech companies. Their tech is undeniably powerful. And generally love the innovations.
It's become too big to fail. The next best alternative is much worse even though Google's search results have been deteriorating. Same with many other social media and industries even.
Google is better than Microsoft!!!! Period. Epic games should focus on giving its customers better support rather than wasting time with google lawsuits. You should probably produce a video about how Microsoft is a pain in the rear for decades with all its users about installing its products. Google is not different to me then vehicle. If I like a red car, I will buy that.
Would be nice to see them forced to divest either UA-cam or Android. Either make this a more open site again or free the Android Open-Source project and rid it of that massive data collection scheme.
I hardly see any users with complaints about Google, only the government... we don't like using Bing anyways and don't know of any other platform that can match UA-cam
Nothing wrong with being big. Eg A big bank like JPMorgan Chase. There is a problem when you have a monopoly, like here, and not due to innovation, but because you have been paying the competition not to develop one themselves, like the video mentions Google paying Apple 20 billion for apple’s default to be google search. That is a big anti-competitive problem
@@ExcelfinMaybe the companies that accepted the money from the monopolizing company should also be liable since they enabled it. Companies have a choice to not accept the deal.
@@Excelfin Microsoft had more than a decade to develop Bing. With all their resources they could not make Bing a viable competitor. It is simply about who has the best product. You can see the comments made by the Apple executive who appeared in the trial as well. Even if Google discontinues their deal with Apple, how many people do you really think would choose Bing over Google? Also if Apple develops their own search engine it does not necessarily mean it'll be a better product. Apple Maps is a prime example. This whole case is a complete waste of resources and time for Google as well as the US Govt.
Google is a monopoly but insurance providers and electricity providers upping their prices when you have no other options is not a monopoly? LOL
Electricity providers are regulated monopolies in most states, price rises are approved by the govt. We still have many major insurance providers but yes if they collude or you dont have choice in a particular area that's a problem.
Google is not a monopoly. There are plenty of choices. You can use Bing or Safari and pay for map services instead of relying on the Google Map THAT THEY PROVIDE FOR FREE.
@@karlxmit Tell that to PG&E in Northern California who extort their "customers" for profit
and internet providers
@@moneyglitch the solution is class action
Spoiler alert: nothing will happen
Liar
Corporations own the body politic, so there is unlikely to be a breakup.
agree
US already bought and owned by companies , nothing will happen. ALL TALK
do not despair, the Ftc chairman Lina khan will absolutely break them up. She has been known to scare other companies into merging, it's why Aldis and Krogers never merged.
While I don't disagree with some of the video's points on mobile devices, Chrome is not the one trying to auto-install itself like Bing and Yahoo as a default browser on desktop.
Im with you on that. Those are straight up viruses.
If they’re going after chrome, they need to go after Microsoft and the Edge browser lol
Does yahoo even do that anymore, and edge being installed automatically on a windows computer is like Samsung internet being installed on a Samsung. The issue is that Google is the default search engine for smashing internet because they payed for it.
@SilverEyeStallionHasn't Microsoft also done the same? Search for the wiki for embrace, extend, extinguish in your preferred search mechanism.
@@dubby5768On One UI it is possible to uninstall the browser, unlike Edge in Windows which is automatically reinstalled
Irony - This video is posted on that platform which is also owned by google itself 😂
Probably, Google is involved with Diddy as well
gold haha
If it happens, Google might not own UA-cam for long...
No, there's no proof Google is a monopoly, they only control search engines, video content, you name it, and the only competitor in the video content category was only able to grow because it was created in a secluded market in China.
UA-cam was once a different company and then Google swallowed it
Google is the only big tech stock trading with a good P/E.
Low P/E is indicative the market doesn't like it. High P/E could be just speculation.
拜登應該不想要太多失業者 英文
UA-cam should have a rival. Their ads are irritating
Everyone agrees they should, we all despise these ads. It's just not that simple to create an actual competitor
Rumbles no better now either
Tik Tok, Instagram, Netflix, Amz prime, All of television etc. would be considered rivals as they provide video content
we already have tiktok
@@reecep1457 no. Not like UA-cam those are movie hosting sites
They won’t do a thing. Perfect time to buy Google stock
Usually a break up is good for the existing stockholders (historically) so if you think nothing will happen, you shouldn't be buying Google stock
@@sharpasacueballcan you expand on this? Do existing shareholders get compensatory shares of the resultant breakup? Or is there something else?
@@tonyoostendorp7754the idea is that the sum of its parts are worth more separately than having them all under one umbrella because certain aspects of the business are more risky than others, and others have higher margins or higher levels of a moat. For example googles cloud computing business would likely trade at a higher P/E multiple than GOOGL stock currently since it’s a higher growth business than their search ad business, in addition to UA-cam likely trading at a premium. Another reason is if the companies are separate then each entity becomes a bit more transparent in financial reporting, known as unbundling.
@@sharpasacueball whats the source for this? Highly depends on the company and google has a lot of unprofitable sectors with their few profitable sectors being advertisement. Also why would people sell google stock on news of breakup? Your right that most companies have benefited but when has a major breakup like this been done besides at&t?
How come Adobe never got an antitrust lawsuit for monopolizing the graphic software market?
They have a lot of alternatives
@@감비아-w6k same with Google.
Answer: because it wouldn't draw enough attention to egocentric state prosecutors.
More alternatives and the majority of them are free. Like gimp is just goated.
Because Graphic Software is nowhere near Search advertising market which is one of the most lucrative on earth
I just googled to see if this was true
If they break up Google, they will need to break up Microsoft, amazon, and apple. Notice how they said the whole case is that google uses its dominance in one area to succeed in another, its not a level playing field. Same exact thing can be said for the other tech conglomerates. If this goes through we are going to see a massive break up of our largest companies.
Not Apple.Apple Isn't a monopoly in smartphone industry
@@Hasanaljadid there services business for sure has monopolistic behavior. Use of super apps are banned by apple because they depend less on apples smartphone proprietary software. Limiting their devices to only function in their ecosystem of devices like the apple watch. Apple forces third-party payment services to use its own digital wallet rather than offering their services in separate apps. There are so many monopolistic behaviors apple has going on in its business. In the smartphone industry they have a duopoly with Samsung and maintain this due to them putting compatibility limitations with its products in its ecosystem. At the end of the day if google is broken up, apple should be broken up with all the other monopolistic tech conglomerates.
Politicians and pensions funds are desperate to create more companies to own more stock
Indeed, the US government has established that they really don’t care about monopolies. The wort that ever happens is the CEO has to speak to congress and nothing really changes.
@@cybersteadyChinese smartphone Brands are more popular Worldwide then Samsung or Apple
The problem is the other search engines are really lousy though
Clearly you have never used Bing or duckduckgo
Are they really? I use 3 or 4 different engines depending on which device I'm using. They don't feel so different nowadays, so I just choose whichever I find interesting at the moment of configuration. Right now I'm testing Ecosia.
@@JustaTechSavvyGuy.is that sarcasm 😂 surely so, because nobody seriously mentions bing. Maybe just for video
@@ixrkyeah as daily driver only google is decent. However, I use LLM much more now. Google has certainly gone downhill, but it’s still better than the others as a daily driver.
@@Hshjshshjsj72727 no Bing isn't that bad, once you start getting used to it, I mainly use duckduckgo tho
Separating Microsoft’s browser and operating system allowed Google to compete with their browser … Google had new innovations and are the leader today due to that.
and now they are doing the same but instead of innovating they just pay a bunch of millions dollars to be the default
no they didn't. They purchased tech with $$$. Google didn't create UA-cam or Android or Maps, these were businesses which were purchased and in so doing, they basically bought up all potential competition. Same with Apple and Adobe.
Terrible idea to breakup Google.
"Google makes it really hard to use Duck Duck Go on an Android."
lol nobody except Joe Rogan is trying to use Duck Duck Go 😂
Google does not depend on nvidia gpus. It's for third party consumers.
I'm not a programmer, but I can tell you there is code in the Apache license, which is supposed to be a simple text document.
Bring Julianne Iwersen Niemann on the show. She changed my life Financially I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Julianne Iwersen Niemann, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market.
I’ve heard of her
How can i reach her, if you don't mind me asking?
her name is 'JULIANNE IWERSEN NIEMANN'. Just research the name. You'd find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.
I appreciate this. After curiously searching her name online and reviewing her credentials, I'm quite impressed. I've contacted her as I could use all the help I can get
The thing is people often doubt the prospects of financial advisors like Julianne Iwersen Niemann in business/markets today.
Well it gives me more time to get ahead while they stew in their own pity and doubts as they childishly complain about those spreading the word
Julianne killed my dog
Remember: Don't be Evil.....
no longer their motto.
The ones who want to push for change are usually the ones with the most skin in the game.
It does not take 10-15 steps to change a default browser. Also you get asked during device setup and have the option to choose duckduckgo
Dont be a shill for the machine
@@cy9141 dude, it's literally a fact
@@DJAlexParker cool, can you list the exact steps to change your browser? Ill wait
@@cy9141 LMAO bro you are such a troll. You know its easy. Stop kidding yourself.
@@cy9141it is extremely easy to change the search engine. I don't see why it's a problem that Google is the default. If they made Google the ONLY option then ye, that would be a problem.
I'm favored financially,, with Bitcoin ETFs approval, Thank you buddy.$34,000 weekly profit regardless of how bad it gets on the economy…
Same here, I believe the Bitcoin ETFs approval will be life changing opportunity for us, with my current portfolio of $108,000 from my investments with my personal financial advisor i totally agree with you
YES!!! That's exactly her name (Margaret Emily) so many people have recommended highly about her and am just starting with her, Kairangi from Brisbane Australia..🇦🇺
people are ignorant of profitability in bitcoin investment and that has been the major issues limiting their investment
She is my family' personal Broker and also a personal Broker to many families in the United states, she is a licensed broker and a FINRA AGENT in the United States.🇺🇸
@@BdhdDd-q4f This sounds so good and I would like to be a party to this, is there any way I can speak with her?
Google isn't the only one that does data harvesting and targeted ads like this. Streaming services, social media, and even your car (if made in the last ~10 years) is tracking and selling your data. You can't escape it now unless you live a pre-internet lifestyle and completely disconnect since all large sites are Web 2 formatted. Gone are the days of Web 1 when we made our own silly websites and chat rooms about your fave hobby.
I seriously don't care what happens as long as I can still use Google search. Every other search engine I use sucks ass
so you admit google just made a superior product and is suffering from success
i spout a lot of hate for Google but i just wish Google would return to being the best, a company becomes a monopoly when the quality of their products no longer correlates to their revenue
Tech is the 1 industry where the more powerful the company the more capable and high quality the tech becomes. Breaking up a tech company won’t raise the ceiling on technological advancements
And yet it wasnt google or meta or microsoft or amazon that first release a commercial AI.
Nope, the quality noticeably degrades over time even in tech
But the fact is google changed from "not being evil" to being purely that. They should face different lawsuits anyway, but punishments are too low in US. All companies prefer to pay fines rather than comply woth law.
@@XGD5layer you must be new to the internet. what we have today is 10000% better than what we have in 1999.
@@mjuy-ur3xn I'm not talking about hardware companies, but yes I like most people on the internet only joined in the 2000s. The number of internet users in 2005 was only around 1 billion, when today it's over 5 billion.
I don't see a monopoly here; consumers have chosen Google, much like how many have chosen Apple's iPhone. If people want a better, more optimized search experience for free, that's their choice. This is just simply outdated antitrust laws. So, I'm not sure why people or the government are complaining. I mean there is Bing out there if you want to use it.
Just competitors are complaining... Imagine if Google will move to different country, US will cry.
@@GianniJohn Google will be broken up and will be stopped if it tries to move. Two words: Iron Curtain.
How does consumer have chosen google mean it isnt a monopoly they are using the power they have to stop competitors trying to enter the market
Apple isn't paying service providers to make their phone contracts exclusively apple
Nothing will happen. This is a great example of network effect. Those that are crying over this can use Bing or DuckDuckGo. Good luck!
Why are we not talking about Amazon and it's monopolistic competition over the internet?
their lobby is very powerful. nobody will touch them at this moment.
They are also being sued over that
So if you want me to make you understand how to make profit from this tradition platform then just reply my comment and I will tell you it just to show you the right trading platform which I have been using to help others
Amazon was mentioned and has a suit filed against them
Just register/move the company to a different country, case closed.
They might incur financial losses due to taxations, but at least they'll save the company and it's vision.
Have to make sure no government agents are working for those companies, to censor content. If there are, there should be criminal and civil penalties.
The fact that Epic Games plays such a central role in attacking the "tolls" Google and Apple take for their services show that you need power to break power. Over time, an unregulated industry will always get worse. That's why we need good, honest government regulations here.
Break Google up to only have individual companies to coalesce in the future like the *_Baby Bells_* 🤷
Nobody wants to use Bing or edge
What she said is very true the key point to everything over here is that Google is already a big ecosystem financially and technologically
All that data and they still cant find the right customer base for my ads.
Google is simply the US of the tech world.
*Internet, not tech
Google is a saint compared to Adobe
i hope android doesnt get sold, it is one of the things google does well
It's gotten worse in many aspects and is becoming more and more tied to Google, which is bad
Google is unavoidable, Apple can try its hardest but it has always tended to the "rich" and Google focused on the common man
Just because a breakup is hard to do, doesn’t mean it shouldn’t and can’t be done.
@9:12 Railroad barrons and steel manufacturers have completely disappeared from America. Looking back now, how I wish there is accessible mass transportation like trains and manufacturing jobs like those provided by steel factories in the USA. America shot itself in the foot by meddling in free market. 😢
No, America reduced the tariffs for products made overseas. Enough so that the setup costs moving production was cheaper than keeping production. This is America staying out of the free market
The problem with breaking up Google along departmental lines is that the profitable departments (ad services) would still be printing money as the dominant player in the industry, while their subsidized departments that deliver the services people use (like UA-cam, Google Drive, and to a lesser extent Google Search) would likely go bankrupt.
So, we'd lose so much data, and still end up with a massive advertising monopoly.
I'm not saying the status quo is tenable or right. I'm saying that structurally, our economic policies and legal options aren't designed for the kind of world we now live in. No corporation should own this much of our daily lives, but by applying existing remedies, we'd be blowing off our kneecaps to try and cure cancer.
Blackrock, State Street, and Vanguard should be BROKEN up!
Im for Google, there is no other big company that actually shares its funds with people like youtubers and offers free and reliable products. Every big tech company collects data. Id rather it be Google
I understand Google being the default search engine on Android phones since Google owns and develops Android. Them paying Apple $20B goes to show how much more money they make out of the data that they collect.
We need to discuss capitalism. Our country celebrates building a company from the ground up, and that's what Google did in the early 2000s. Now they're so big signing agreements, not forcing other companies to take their money, but enting into agreements to become the default search engine on devices and other platforms. This should be a celebration of the success of a company. Not talking about breaking them up. We also need to discuss antitrust laws. Isn't antitrust hypocritical to capitalism?
capitalism ultimately will create jungle law, civilized one, probably, but still...
It's monopoly and isn't capitalism but crony capitalism with consolidation with underhanded methods
- Isn't antitrust hypocritical to capitalism?
The answer is a resounding no. When a corporation becomes too powerful and swallows up all its competition, then it is no longer a free market. Just as Standard Oil was broken up into smaller companies, Big Tech and other "Big" companies must be broken up.If they are not broken up, we will no longer have capitalism, but rather the consolidation of a neo-feudal system with large techno-feudal lords.
It sounds like you're talking about Laissez-faire capitalism which has never been successful anywhere. Any system turned into an ideology, and taken to its most extreme tends to lose sight of its original reasons for being. What we want is an efficient allocation of capital, which requires the ability for new competitors to rise, because we know that drives innovation, productivity, economic growth etc. Capitalism should be thought of as a tool not an ideology, and like any system (such as a sports league), it works best when regulated to keep the desired outcomes on track. So is intervention antithetical to capitalism? Yes but it's not antithetical to the reasons America adopted a mixed economy with a capitalist component in the first place.
You really don’t understand that this isn’t a free market or capitalism anymore. We are entering late stage capitalism. We the ppl are truly screwed and I can’t help but feel like part of the problem. I work in private equity and before that i was in VC and ib. We’ve allowed the big guys to destroy any chance of companies competing especially start ups. So many times we would take on a small startup just so a fortune 1000 could come in and snuff them out via an acquisition. Nothing is going to happen. Politicians are bought and paid for.
The funniest thing in this video are the thought that Duck Duck Go is a relevant search engine (its not) and that Epic Games will pass the savings to customers if the Google Play store fees is reduced (they wont) 🤣
For epic games - keeping the status quo of a parasite on ppl creating the actual apps and games is unacceptable and can’t be maintained. Something must be done
Well that's just it. Other search engines CANT be relevant precisely because of Google monopolist behaviour. If not prevented from doing so, a lot of people would easily opt for a decent search engine that doesn't steal their data.
In Epic's case your argument is a lot weaker because Epic has none-mobile platforms as well yet prices across both mobile and non-mobile are standardised.
Meaning Google(and Apple) fees mean they make less on mobile than console/PC. Whether or not the standardised prices are artificially inflated to cover their losses on mobile is another question entirely.
Duck Duck Google
Remember askjeeves? Bing? The one with the spider? Even yahoo and Bing are relatively unknown. Once the 90s ended Google took over and the old internet was over.
Ran Pauls statement was more outrageous. No proof of google being a monopoly. Yeah that's why marketing courses literally teach how to use google, and it's not even limited to search engines they control video content as well, violating free speech rights by censoring youtube as well, how the hell can that guy make such a statement without having tomatoes thrown at him. UA-cam has been a monopoly for DECADES and the only competitior that was able to emerge was created in a distached market in China, literally proving my point, Tik Tok only still exists because Google couldn't touch their market in China.
What about Microsoft? They have monopoly in operating system, productivity apps ,AI and ,cloud. Their dominance in os and productivity app like office and excel and ERPs give them edge in cloud industry
1. Windows is an open platform. Microsoft solved their antitrust issues regarding this in the 90s.
2. It's not a monopoly, Apple exists in the home computer market. (Again, nowhere near as dominant as in the 90s)
3. Google, Apple, and dozens of others have taken significant share of the 'productivity apps' space. Microsoft is nowhere near as dominant as they were in the 90s (where they didn't need to break up because of the positive changes they made)
4. Amazon has more cloud marketshare than Microsoft.
The video is about Google. Microsoft having a monopoly doesn't make change anything about Google having one, too. And if you watched the video, they mentioned Microsoft's illegal monopoly.
And let's not forget bill gates is buying all the farmland in America. That's a food monopoly waiting to happen. Nevermind the water rights he's taking from everyone else. None of it should be legal.
I don't believe my eyes!
CNBC is actually reporting on something newsworthy.
If the government is investigating Google then that means they are not paying them enough money 😂😂😂😂
who does NOT use Google? all this is for the convenience of the consumer, that does NOT pay for all these great Google features. Google gives this access for FREE. that is not a monopoly.
How cute, you think it is free? 😆
@@Joe-bepop if your suggesting it's baked into a higher price you pay, well go direct to a website and check that out
@@Traci.Nelsonwhen you are not paying for the product.... You are product...
@abhishekkulkarni2918 that's just a buzz phrase. So what if they show you an ad. They didn't make you click it or buy something without your will. This whole thing so stupid.
google is best search engine
The fact that Google is trying to be like Samsung and Apple is hilarious AF!😂
We had a very generic business name that included the core product. We were at the forefront of online searches due to this. A visit from a rep of these crooks with the offer of top listing for $5000 a month was rebuffed. Already page 1 so why pay? Within a fortnight we were page 8.
same kinda reasons they tried to break up Microsoft, and failed.
Don’t call it the only search engine on Samsung phones or iPhones. In fact, Google is the default one among 5 other engines
I feel like the argument about Google's ability to rise to prominence during Microsoft's antitrust case is an argument in favor of divestment.
I haven’t used google chrome in years
All I ever needed to search for was a phase during highschool and college.
I don’t care about other tech companies becoming too big at this point in time I just want to be able to afford my medicine. The government should go after the pharmaceutical industry, but they don’t because those companies support the political parties.
Bought XAI33x after watching your video, super excited! 💰
Wht is that?
This is a bot promoting some crypto/ crypto influencers
Monopoly’s: Apple, Disney, Kelloggs, Tesla, Amazon, J&J, Microsoft, etc. etc. etc.
And everyone of them will be broken up.
"Wipe them out. All of them." - Darth Sidious, Star Wars Episode I The Phantom Menace
Google ad is very discasting, Google ad remove 😠😠😠😠😠😠
USA Must OWN their own Google.
Free economy - they can do as they please. We actively choose to use their services.
Once Elon Musk's XAI33x passes $1, it may NEVER see that low again
If not for anti-trust prosecution, we may not have seen small innovative companies have a chance to grow. IBM facing monopoly suit gave rise to DEC, Microsoft. Microsoft monopoly suit gave rise to Google. Google suit gives rise to ....?
google
Open AI
@@Parannadikkum.simon5 they have no chance
harmony OS 😅
Could be open AI but let's see.
US to Google: It's not me, it's you
Google trying to appeal means breaking google is not just necessary but also can teach companies to see a vrry good example of what can happen to avoid the same problem.. Google is becoming insensitive at this point instead of doing better
The government never like whatever products that's good for the citizens - therefore, it's always to break them up(alla: Facebook, Amazon 😢)
Bought XAI33x after watching your video, super excited!
"Companies pay UA-cam to show ads. People pay UA-cam NOT to show ads."Double dipping as it is.
But still you can watch it for free.
Google ads from search will be surely threatened regardless if Google is broken up.
I honestly think Elon Musk's XAI33x is the safest bet for long term hold, and will survive out of every other altcoins. It will get adopted in US, Ecuador, Asia, starting from Japan, and slowly spread out and gain. This is a winning coin, apart from all the technical greatness.
Trash bot
I'm happy I saw the video for the XAI33x crypto token or else I would've missed it lol
US govt needs funding.
*Lately I got interested in lnvestlng but have no idea on how to go about it. Can anyone help with a reliable tra-der?????🙏*
l started my investment with $2,000, a week later , we had grown to $10,500. this man!! absolute genius
if you can't manage to change your default search you probably should just walk away from the keyboard :)
Not everyone is a nerd. Not everyone know that you can change the default search.
@@gabdongipark agree, default settings are a very big part of the problem. there probably shouldn't be one
Of all the big tech companies, google is by far the biggest and greatest offender.
They should makes way more jobs 3x the ceo 3x HR 3x marketing team 3x every shift and they must build 2 new HQ and janitors and we need more jobs
Is it all that big a deal? I say don’t break them up. Let them churn out everything they can. I personally don’t have a vendetta on the data privacy thing, from any of the tech companies.
Their tech is undeniably powerful. And generally love the innovations.
United States market is heavily monopolized and nothing changes because the politicians also have huge shares in those companies.
It's become too big to fail. The next best alternative is much worse even though Google's search results have been deteriorating. Same with many other social media and industries even.
Nothing is too big to fail.
I'm fine with breaking up Google, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, etc. but nothing will probably happen
Google is better than Microsoft!!!! Period. Epic games should focus on giving its customers better support rather than wasting time with google lawsuits. You should probably produce a video about how Microsoft is a pain in the rear for decades with all its users about installing its products. Google is not different to me then vehicle. If I like a red car, I will buy that.
Google is better. We don't mind bc it's a proper search and advertising product!! Stop hating Bro 😂.
What a hit job this piece was..
A.I race is the root cause.
Spoiler-no because that would hurt all the congressman’s stock portfolios
Oh yes it will happen. Congress are not allowed to own stocks and all their stocks have been taken away.
If they do, I'm on #TeamGoo
And the highlight is they are using platform which is built by Google(alphabet) and blaming them for anti-trust
UA-cam was bought and integrated into the ecosystem
Google keeps deleting my business account for no reason
why is rand paul being interviewed as if he was a credible source?
Would be nice to see them forced to divest either UA-cam or Android. Either make this a more open site again or free the Android Open-Source project and rid it of that massive data collection scheme.
Both UA-cam and android would die alone. UA-cam is a loss for Google and open source doesn't work without a hard (not firm) hand on the wheel.
I hardly see any users with complaints about Google, only the government... we don't like using Bing anyways and don't know of any other platform that can match UA-cam
and chrome > safari, google workspace competes well with Microsoft office suite especially bc they have cloud storage
... which is because google has a monopoly and actively prevents other companies and projects from growing.
@@MilkywayWarrior1618 or other companies just aren't good enough. There are alternatives but they are no bueno
All the time I see plenty who complain about Google. You must be limited to your bubble
@@sauceokay ... because they don't have the resources to grow
They should break up apple first tbh
Such a BS case. You can't simply target companies because they are big. Scrutiny is fine but too much overreach is not good
Nothing wrong with being big. Eg A big bank like JPMorgan Chase. There is a problem when you have a monopoly, like here, and not due to innovation, but because you have been paying the competition not to develop one themselves, like the video mentions Google paying Apple 20 billion for apple’s default to be google search. That is a big anti-competitive problem
@@ExcelfinMaybe the companies that accepted the money from the monopolizing company should also be liable since they enabled it. Companies have a choice to not accept the deal.
@@Excelfin Microsoft had more than a decade to develop Bing. With all their resources they could not make Bing a viable competitor. It is simply about who has the best product. You can see the comments made by the Apple executive who appeared in the trial as well.
Even if Google discontinues their deal with Apple, how many people do you really think would choose Bing over Google?
Also if Apple develops their own search engine it does not necessarily mean it'll be a better product. Apple Maps is a prime example.
This whole case is a complete waste of resources and time for Google as well as the US Govt.
Naah I have a sh*t ton of google stocks don't you dare
US should break up Blackrock , Vanguard , Statestreet etc 🙄
the question is "what is the "command" that google is not obeying?"
There’s no other search engine better than google. In iOS you can choose others like yahoo but ewww why would you do that? 😬
There is no other.... Cause google didn't allow others......
@@abhishekkulkarni2918Wdym they don't you can easily change
@@abhishekkulkarni2918Google is still gonna exist even after the split so what's stopping the competition
Yes, because apple had a contract to make Google the default search engine
@@jordanwardle11 it takes like 5 minutes
So what I’m hearing is Google/Apple is doing better and smarter business than everyone else 🤷🏾♂️🥱
So is CNBC ever going to drop a video where they answer their own question
Dude you only have this comment in this channel. Go watch some skibidi