I agree that many people are considering NVDA as the "Stock of the year." However, I'm curious about which stocks could potentially become the next META in terms of growth over the next decade. I've allocated $200k for investment, looking for companies to make additions to boost performance
Buying a stock is easy, but buying the right stock without a time-tested strategy is incredibly hard. hence I will suggest you get yourself a financial-Advisor that can provide you with entry and exit points on best stocks to buy now or put on a watchlist
True. Having the right financial planner is invaluable. My portfolio is well-matched for every season of the market and recently hit 90% rise from early last year. I and my CFP are working on a 7 figure ballpark goal, though this could take till Q3 2024.
My CFA Lucinda Margaret Crist a renowned figure in her line of work. I recommend researching her credentials further... She has many years of experience and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market
AI stocks will dominate 2025. Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has made more than 200% from NVIDIA. I'll also take these other recommendations you made.
I agree, just because the market presents opportunities doesn't mean we should rush in headfirst. For this reason, we should look for appropriate market analysis or guidance or, alternatively, seek advice from certified market strategists.
Agreed! this is why I work with one. My $520k portfolio is well-matched for every market season yielding 85% rise from early last year to date. I and my advisor are working on more figures for this year. IMO, financial advisors are the most sought-after professionals after doctors.
I think it's important to stick to stocks that are immune to economic policies. AI stocks that have the potential to power and transform future technologies. It seems AI is the trajectory most companies are taking, including even established FAANG companies. Maybe there are other recommendations?
I bought into NVIDIA around September last year because my financial advisor recommended it to me. She said the company is selling shovels in a gold rush. It accounted for almost 80% of my market return this year.
@@JoeWilmoth-k2w That's a great analogy and I love the insight. Professionals could make a really big difference in investing, and I think everyone should have one. There are aspects of market trends that are difficult for the untrained eyes to see.
@@CharliesMcCormicks The beauty of MARGARET MOLLI ALVEY approach is her dual focus: while aggressively pursuing profit opportunities, she's equally tenacious about shielding investors from potential pitfalls. It's a balance few can achieve.
With around £120k invested in tech/TSLA stocks, any suggestions for additional stocks to diversify across various markets? Looking for a well-rounded portfolio that balances risk aversion with returns meeting yearly inflation concerns.
Prioritize two goals: strategically sell stocks to limit losses and maximize gains, and be prepared to capitalize on market shifts. Consult a financial advisor or professional for personalized guidance.
Certainly, I've been consulting with a Certified Financial Planner (CFP) since the outbreak. Beginning with an initial fund of $80k, my advisor makes decisions on when to enter and exit positions in my portfolio, which has now expanded to around $350k.
"Julianne Iwersen Niemann" a highly respected figure in her field. I suggest delving deeper into her credentials, as she possesses extensive experience and serves as a valuable resource for individuals seeking guidance in navigating the financial market.
AI stocks are currently experiencing volatility, but with the right strategy and analysis, there’s significant potential for gains. Bloomberg and other financial outlets have reported cases of individuals earning over $250K in just a matter of weeks or months. It’s clear that, there’s a wealth transfer taking place-provided you know where to focus your efforts.
DCAing amongst various assets is a good strategy and can help reduce the impact of market volatility and thus a good strategy if you are looking to compound . However it is important to consider financial advisory when investing .
A lot of folks downplay the role of advlsors until being burnt by their own emotions. I remember couple summers back, after my lengthy divorce, I needed a good boost to help my business stay afloat, hence I researched for licensed advisors and came across someone of utmost qualifications. She's helped grow my reserve notwithstanding inflation, from $275k to $850K.
This is definitely considerable! think you could suggest any professional/advlsors i can get on the phone with? i'm in dire need of proper portfollo allocation
Viviana Marisa Coelho is her name. She is regarded as a genius in her area and works for Empower Financial Services. By looking her up online, you can quickly verify her level of experience. She is well knowledgeable about financial markets.
An exorbitant amount of water to cool them? The cooling systems are closed loop. It’s not like they’re drawing water and dumping it. It’s all about fear when it comes to CNBS.
Clean water is a big problem. Every MEGA Factory was dropped into industrial areas that was short water before TESLA arrived and that's all over the world.
My career has been in air conditioning (including industrial cooling) and energy efficiency. When they talk about water used in data centres, they are talking about water evaporated in cooling towers. A small percentage of the circulating water flow evaporates to enhance the cooling effect. Not all data centres however use open tower systems. Modern data centres run quite warm cooling water (around 18 degrees centigrade), and use air cooled systems that don’t waste any water.
So Irwin thinks Elon Musk should give up on AI, robotics, and self-driving, and just "stick to what he knows... making EVs". This is the most ignorant comment I've heard in a long time. Someone this ignorant has no business offering business commentary on a business channel. Does he realize he's talking about the guy who spearheaded not just the entire global EV revolution but the world's first successful privately-funded rocket company, and has massively disrupted the global launch industry, the global energy storage industry, the global communications industry, the brain-computer interface industry... the list goes on and on. But yeah, Musk should just "stick to what he knows - making EVs".
Well being like Elon have its issues as why he is getting so much agro because is is disruptive so he have a lot of enemies sometimes even whole countries that hate him. Most ppl try to play safe and not make waves. Sad but true. Thats why people like him are rare.
Overpromising and unverdelivering even more? Yeah no.. we can live without CEOs like Elon. Just keep in mind that Elon has jackshit to do with what actually happens in the projects he is the face of. That's the engineers. Elon is not one of them, even if he wants you to believe that. All elon does is make up goals and hype up expectations to pump stock, then shift the promise to next year after it obviously and without fail doesnt get delivered in time.
@@AlwaysThirstyshe builds and motivates the best teams in the world. It's his superpower. His team's do the work and as you'll note he relentlessly thanks the teams. Who else builds successful teams in so many different spheres of technology? Other space obsessed, nearly going bust in the beginning, fancy homes, islands, yachts like the bloke selling books from his garage or Lp's from his transit van?
@@slyktech1860 Yep, he was wrong about us going to Mars, we already have 20 million humans there thanks to elon. He was wrong about the massive taxi fleets across the world, accidents have gone down to 0 and no one has died in an auto accident for years now. He was wrong about the hyperloop, he speculated it'd be a tunnel in vegas going 25mph, but instead its a vast system of tubes that connects the world, going 1,000 mph an hour! WE LOVE ELON!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have had a ride in the driverless taxis that are being compared to FSD. The Waymo is just a electric trolley. It goes on a fixed path around the city. if you want to go somewhere on the path, then you can maybe get there as long as nothing unusual is blocking you. If it gets stuck, you have to call a human who is monitoring the Waymo, and they will take over. Cruise is limited to limited freeways that have been pre mapped. Also there has to be another car in front of you to follow. It is useful if you are going on the pre-mapped route. It is limited by speed and darkness as well. Mostly useless. Supervised FSD will take you anywhere, no pre-mapping or forced trolley routes. In return you must still be ready to take control if you think you should. I have taken FSD trips of over 1000 miles with most of the miles under FSD control. I can't do that with Waymo or Cruise or any of the others. CNBC almost always leaves all of this out of their stories. I wonder why? If you don't believe me, then try it for yourself.
I have tried it. FSD cut off a semi truck, coasted in the fast lane while not passing traffic, and even took a wrong exit on the highway. It was at the point where my attentiveness felt like I was a parent teaching their kid how to drive: I might as well have been driving the car. What you listed as weaknesses for Cruise and Waymo are their strengths and why they have level 4 and 5 self driving capabilities and Tesla is stuck at Level 2.
@@biomaniac22 when OP says waymo and cruise are electric trolleys on fixed paths, he must be referring to the fact that they stay in the lanes and follow traffic rules. To him it seems Tesla's ability to ignore lanes and disregard traffic rules like a human is a feature and not a bug 😂
Have you’ve been on a Waymo? It’s pretty darn impressive. Tesla’s autonomous technology is certainly impressive but their approach is very inefficient. I wouldn’t take anything Musk says at face value. His near total flip flop on Dojo is a good example of that.
@@greghelton4668I feel that Elon will eventually perfect his approach at FSD and it will be the superior one, thus giving Tesla an extreme edge. He can always add the other sensors later if his approach fails, but I sincerely believe it won't
@@anthony9013 could be. The weakest point of Tesla’s approach is that vision does a lousy job in predicting distance and being blind in inclement weather. We humans are equally bad. I personally think LiDAR does add much value but nano wave radars do, and it can see in bad weather. Tesla isn’t collecting radar data in the meantime.
lol ya. craig Irwin is a quack. imagine not knowing how to write a line of code but he's telling the software engineers who are making 5 mil a year how to build an ai model and what sensors they need to use 🤣🤣
Strange how often everyone is so fast to push Elon under the bus, yet he is the best bet for the future of the US auto industry. And the space industry
Elon belongs under the bus. He has nothing to do with any of these companies, other than owning them. He just makes promises which, mind he, he never delivers on. The engineers working there, many of which he just fired to save a billion a year, just so he can continue to ask for a 50 billion bonus payment, may or may not be very skilled.. but elon is not.
@@BloodBaath I wouldn't expect a substantive response to your question on this comment section. CNBC isn't the forum for actual technical experts, especially on any videos involving musk or Tesla.
They repeatedly jumped between FSD and Autopilot and very different years interchangeably. They effectively conflated 2017+ autopilot with 2024 FSD even though the softwares are completely different. That alone is a huge problem all throughout this video. Additionally, they re-reported the false reporting that Elon improperly diverted Nvidia H100s to xAI. The Austin data center literally wasn’t built yet (drone video shows this) so they’re lying to people (or just grossly ignorant) when they pretend what Elon said isn’t true. The same number of H100s were diverted from xAI to Tesla when the Austin data center was built a few months later. They effectively swapped delivery dates. Another point is pretending that Waymo is “ahead” because they offer autonomous services in a few select cities. Anyone with a basic understanding of this technology would know that tesla could geofence their software to a particular city and focus training on that if they wanted to launch something sooner. However that’s not a good approach since they are getting close to a generalized solution which Waymo has no credible path to reach (unless they high definition map every inch of road in the world). These are just a few of the issues in this video.
Do you believe the reporting about Elon Musk’s AI ventures is inaccurate or biased? Do you believe there’s more to the story that hasn’t been adequately covered? Please enlighten us.
@@Hans-gb4mv Sure, there's the part where they said the gpus sent to XAI instead of Tesla caused Tesla to delay anything. It did not. Tesla did not have the infrastructure for those gpus yet, so they would have say unused in a warehouse. His critics think having them unused in boxes is a better use than having XAI use them.
Bring Stephanie Janis Stiefel on the show. She changed my life Financially I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Stephanie Janis Stiefel, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market.
Well her name is 'STEPHANIE JANIS STIEFEL'. Just research the name. You'd find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.
The thing is people often doubt the prospects of financial advisors like Stephanie Janis Stiefel in business/markets today. Well it gives me more time to get ahead while they stew in their own pity and doubts as they childishly complain about those spreading the word
If a robot(current time) can replace you at your workplace then that means either you have some menial job that a non-sentient robot that can do it better and cheaper than you. It means you’re one of the easily disposable workforce.
Irwin is wrong again. LIDAR has no advantage over a multicamera system but several disadvantages, the most obvious being travel speed and cost. The faster the car travels the faster LIDAR has to rotate else it loses fidelity. Cars with LIDAR cost at least $100K more to augment and they can't even see the curb (ask Cruise about related autonomy death). China has already confirmed Elon's statement that LIDAR is a fool's errand and is deleting LIDAR from their autonomous vehicles.
You are acting like waymo don’t have camera. Waymo has camera and lidar, Tesla only have camera. At the very least waymo can do what Tesla is trying to do with only camera. Lidar just make it safer and give the model more certainty of what is in the area and what is not.
Isn't MobileEye dropping lidar and focusing on vision? Their goal is more in line with what Tesla is doing with FSD so maybe lidar doesn't work at the scale that they are working with unlike Waymo.
@@user-tx9zg5mz5p As competition heats up these will all drop LIDAR or go out of business. Plus, the centrally supervised model with highly tokenized and define maps just doesn't scale well. Plus, a change in the road due to a main break, new construction or accident incurs a response delay that is not a problem with real autonomy like FSD but definitely a problem with a centrally supervised model.
@@enigma-8uThis is incorrect since Waymo has said they can explicitly handle lane changes and rerouting due stuff like construction completely autonomously. ua-cam.com/video/rFhzgkDGXTc/v-deo.htmlsi=0lyiaGD5fvW
@@Devilishlybenevolent Elon is guilty of making amazing things with an overly optimistic timeline. Electric cars late but awesome. Rockets late but saving the US space industry. Self driving late but watch 10/10/24!
@@internationaltaichiallianc5507 His lies gave him huge financial support. No honest people could get his level of financial support. I wonder what could have been done if those support went to honest people.
Tesla is not behind in autonomy, they are ahead. Waymo and the others are restricted to tightly controlled areas with special mapping and remote supervising operators. FSD can go anywhere and is more capable. Proof of this is already documented as Waymo was unable to follow a Tesla on FSD without 44 interventions whereas Tesla ran flawlessly.
Waymo was unable to follow Tesla on FSD sounds like a lie, why would waymo follow Tesla when they use their own mapping avoid the most difficult places. Sound you are a paid bot
Tesla FSD cannot legally drive a car/truck on a road without a human driver. (Level 2 autonomy) Waymo cars routinely drive on regular roads without any person in the car. That is full autonomy in a geo fenced area, (Level 4).
@@bb1111116 You are referring to an operation permit level not a technical one. Technically Waymo can't leave the farm without risk of running off the road. Technically Tesla can go anywhere and has. Thousands of people all over the US already use FSD to commute with no intervention. The only restriction is eyes on the road. Robotaxi is the final step in removing that restriction.
Agreed. Just because he believe he cant do it, doesn't mean its not possible. Thats why he's an analyst and elon musk a multi billionaire. Difference in capabilities.
@@Brian-pq2mo Wealth has little to no correlation to ability, elon musk was the same guy that got lucky because of his inheritance. The same guy that was kicked out of paypal because he wasn't doing anything. The same guy who bought twitter while pumping and dumping doge coin. The same guy that lies about living in a small home. The same guy who got carried by his board member with paypal. Same guy that is asking his company for a 4b a year- 5% of teslas total net worth.
@@AlwaysThirstysexcuse me!?!?!? There wasn't an EV industry till Musk, now it's the biggest industry. People told him he was living in a sci-fi movie when he said he'll make relandable rockets, now it's a reality that few can replicate. The model y is the best selling car in the world. He's singlehandedly saved free speech and continues to fight for it. Yes, his timelines are optimistic. Idiot
You obviously don't understand the difference between geofenced and autonomous driving capabilities. You should try to somewhat understand a subject before you produce a video about it.
@@PreschoolDropout673Geofenced requires huge bulky and expensive cameras/hardware and relies on gps coordinates along with the cameras. Tesla’s FSD acts more like a human and is able to make decisions using artificial intelligence having been trained by hundreds of millions of hours. FSD can drive in places it’s never been.
@@Sanddollar1eh, no offense but it sounds like you're not very familiar with this technology so I'll wait for OP or someone who knows what they're talking about to explain the difference to me. Thanks for trying though 🙏
@@Sanddollar1 But not safely yet. This video was not about Geofencing or autonomous driving per se - it was about Musk's investments in AI and the applications that could come of it.
@@leefox1124 true. It's very common and totally fine for the CEO of a public company to take equipment from said public company and use it at his private company. Totally legit. There was just no space at any of his massive factories to store a few pallets of gpu servers. He had no choice, if he let the hardware sit in the dock it wouldve spoiled. 🙄
@@fendermon you aren't insinuating that such an honest businessman would abuse his position as CEO to embezzle money from Tesla to his own failing private projects, are you? You sir have offended the honor of every simp on this platform!
Irwin is like a broken analog clock which is right twice a day. He belongs to the same group of Tesla bears as Gordon Johnson. My Tesla Model 3 and Y already drives me to work on a daily basis. I used FSD 99% of the time from driveway to/from the company parking lot. FSD is a luxury that no other car company can offer since I have a private chauffer like the richest people in the world. It runs on my 2018 Model 3 and even better on my 2023 Model Y which both use Tesla FSD hardware 3 and the latest software version V12.5.4 :)
Yeah bro I love the Hyperloop that goes 500 mph, love travelling from SF to LA in just an hour! Oh wait... Its just Teslas in a tunnel going 45mph in Vegas? Huh.
@@Devilishlybenevolentthat hasnt got anything to so with Tesla The tunnels are business for the boring company. It hasnt finished the network and will replace the cars for it's manufacturer glass pods You cant expect elon to choose another car brand that would be embarrassing. Its got nothing to do with the hyperloop concept.
@@DevilishlybenevolentElon never promised or had interest to do a hyperloop .. he said it could be done .. and encouraged others to do it .. Same with electric airplanes.. 😂
Requires a visionary leader to challenge and disrupt the norm. To all those skeptics out there, EV was once considered not possible or practical. See where we are today. Elon is a treasure, not just for the US, but for humanity.
elon is a bloody moron. he wasnt even a founder of tesla, he bought his title as founder. hes also super unhinged. he just has tons of money to throw around.
@@stevenhill3136 best selling car on the planet? You’ve NEVER travelled outside the US have you? Actually never outside CA have you? 🤣🤣🤣 He promised you a self driving car and that you would be on Mars by now but Americans love con artist. From Bernie Madoff to SBF so keep buying it.
1,981 days since Elon Musk said there will be a million fully autonomous Tesla robotaxis in a year. (4/22/2019) "The fundamental message consumers should be taking today is that it's financially insane to buy anything other than a Tesla. It'll be like owning a horse in three years." Elon Musk, quoted by Matthew J. Belvedere in CNBC
Elon musk is the goat. I don’t see anyone challenging him, if you think Chinese EV companies, look again, Tesla is dominating the Chinese market, with out the traditional advertisement. Chinese customers knows who has the quality.
Especially safety. I would not buy a Chinese EV, because they have a big problem with quality control and this leads to things like spontaneous combustion and even simple things like Airbags not working (look at Serpentza's videos on this, there are so many examples in China. With Tesla there are no such issues.)
The reason they aren't challenging tesla is because elon gave to biggest backshot ever to the US government to implement tariffs. Tesla sales have declined in china by more than 19%. If you can't see through your own BS I don't know what you are gonna believe.
@@lawrencefrost9063 Serpentza is a known china hater, while he is right in some cases. There is inherent bias in his video that you just can't ignore and he cherry picks evidence to choose his point. (Hes sponsored by some rightwing organizations aka getting paid a salary for his videos)
Not sure why people are so negative towards Elon Musk but I am grateful to have such a genius innovator that patriotic. Imagine all the jobs,tech, or companies we wouldn't have without Musk. People hate on him because of his political opinions but everyone is suppose to be allowed to have one without being attacked. People need to get a grip.
@@rickjames18 a very professional response from you. Just like any fan of Elon musk they are quick to dismiss any criticism and prefer to come with conspiracy nonsense.
@@Avy.YT_shadowbans_comments Your comment is not one to be taken seriously. Get real. Here, Ill bite, Which companies or products did he copy? SpaceX? Tesla? Starlink? Reuseable rockets?
@@rickjames18 he wasn't even in the beginning of Tesla but still takes credit for it. neuralink technology has existed for 3 decades already. There are many ai but Tesla isn't famous for one, supercomputers has nothing to do with him. Purchased Twitter that lost him 22 billion already. And even his success is due to his employees because he never invented anything.For example he claims to have invented the idiot index but that is just another term for efficiency.
Dojo is not a bottleneck. They use more energyefficient Nvidias. The problem is their harder approach based on pure visual input. In the long run, I believe, a winning and scaleable approach
Really the argument is basically foolproof: We humans have a neuralnet and two cameras on a gimbal and we can drive fairly safely. Therefore it is possible.
@@lawrencefrost9063a computer lacks intuition, critical thinking on its own and spontaneous decision making. We can gather a lot of information because of this. If a car needs to be autonomous you need all kinds of data, more data the better and safer. Elon’s thesis will be only eaten up by his gullible rabid fan base
@@lawrencefrost9063 For a man who built his intellectual persona around first principal thinking, Musk has leaned really hard into this false dichotomy of neural nets being like human brains. In summary, no. They both use the sum of adaptive weights to convey information. But that is about the extent of their similarity. Even within the field of neural networks there is a wide diversity concerning how this principal is applied. Relative to them, human neurons are on another planet.
LOL at falling behind Waymo. These other self driving systems aren't scalable. Geofencing and lidar is a joke. That dude Irvin is a simple minded person. One of those people who can't walk and chew gum at the same time.
@@RealShaktimaan Waymo is getting into accidents and stalling in the middle of the road. GM is running over people. Elon might be late on some things, but innovation is not easy. It's more failing than success. Unless you have a better idea brewing in your basement.
@@RealShaktimaanHe is trying to push the envelope. He sets ambitious deadlines. These problems are way harder than even he thought they were, but if you don’t set deadlines that are ambitious it will take a lot longer because people won’t push themselves.
Elon is brash, egotistical, and says what he wants on social that angers some people online. But it doesn’t change the fact the man is a true visionary. He sees things differently than average person. He is not just about profits. He is truly thinking about changing the world. Everyone is all talk. He is action. People on social are so polarized, that just because you don’t like someone, they automatically dismiss the facts. Everyone under the sun is trying to make humanoid robots. They will be working among humans whether people like it or not. We need US companies to be making them. It’s a matter of national security because China will take that market before we even enter it.
Elon whole history is just talk, over promising things that never come: mars trip, hyperloop, 40k cybertruck, self-drvingin cars. Teslas fleet of cars is aging and outdated, twitter has lost 75% of value, SpaceX will not go to Mars anytime this decade,
Why? Just curious, but can you name one thing he ever delivered on? He overpromises stuff "next year" to pump the stock, then shifts the same promise back a year. Rinse and repeat. He just never delivers on anything. Self driving cars, across the entire country / world, with no human intervention, safer than humans driving, were promised "next year" since 2016. Fast forward to 2024, even the summon feature, which basically is the car driving itself, has been disabled. And the last state was that it had troubles reliably being summoned across one parking lot.. let alone actually going across streets. This is about as much of a cliff between promise and reality as is gets, and somehow people still buy his bullcrap lmfao.
Shorting some of my $TSLA stock to secure profits, but I'm retaining a portion for the long term. Tesla's growth potential remains robust. I'm considering diversifying my $200K stock portfolio, but I'm uncertain about managing risks in my next move.
De-risk your portfolios, shore up your core holdings, and take some profits while balancing your portfolio allocations. I’d also suggest you go with a managed portfolio, but even those don’t perform so well, so it’s best you reach out to a proper fiduciary to guide you, that’s what works for my spouse and I. We've made over 80% capital growth minus dividends.
I've stuck with the popularly ‘’Monica Shawn Marti” for about five years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive. She’s quite known in her field, I agree with her.
I really appreciate your useful advice. I was able to set up a call with her and confirm her identity. She seems incredibly knowledgeable, and I hope I'm able to connect with her.
Critics that say Tesla is just a car company are woefully uninformed. When you look at who's ahead regarding self-driving cars you have to compare apples to apples. Waymo drives in highly structured environments. Mercedes has level two but only on highways. The only company creating a self-driving car that can drive anywhere is Tesla. What's more, Tesla's approach using cameras and AI is precisely the way humans Drive. The same people down on Tesla are decrying the dangers of AI domination. It's absurd to suggest that an AI smarter than a human won't be able to drive a car with eight cameras. Given that fact, It's only a matter of WHEN Tesla's FSD will happen not if. FSD an incredibly difficult problem to solve and the fact Elon Musk is overly optimistic about when it will arrive is understandable. We should not give any oxygen to those on the sidelines criticizing those in the arena pushing Humanity forward.
That depends on way too many factors for anybody to help you. Like.. where do you even live, what experience do you have and so on. The usual approach is to just look for job ads and go from there. Unless you know someone who can open a door for you, of course, which is the easiest way.
That's not saying much, because the cars still don't perform as they should. Being the leader isn't enough; the car has to perform reliably and safely in all kinds of scenarios, over and over again, and Tesla's not there yet. A competent autonomous design would use more than just the optical band. For example, taking input from both optical cameras and a passive infra-red camera would prevent the kinds of crashes we have seen with Tesla vehicles in many situations. Now, infrared is not perfect. We have a Night Vision system on our car, and its performance is degraded in heavy rain and snow. But having a computer check inputs from one part of the EM spectrum against another reduces the chances of misinterpretation. (This happens in fighter jets too. For example, Navy pilots flying the F-14D Super Tomcat used its Infrared Spot and Track system to reacquire targets that managed to break the lockon of the APG-71's Doppler mode, enabling them to reacquire the target with the radar) Until I see that kind of improvement, I'm sticking with cars whose technology is there to help the driver drive the car. Those cars do have some useful autonomous feature - for example, you get out of the car, close the door, hit a button and the car parks itself. Later, you come back, hit a button, and the car pulls out of the parking spot and pulls up next to you. Or the car automatically reverses out of a parking garage with a twisty, windy path that it recorded when you pulled into the parking spot. Those autonomous functions happen at slow speed; they are NHTSA certified, and the worst that can happen, generally is a minor fender-bender. I can trust that. Will Tesla (and others) get to a place where we can trust it? At some point in the future.
@@ronaryel6445 thanks Captain obvious but overall you don't know enough on the subject. I'm not trying to be combative but it sounds like you just started following the Tesla story last week.
@@artinweddings Wrong, sweetheart, I know enough about it to keep up with you, and you have no clue how long I've followed it. If what I said were so obvious you would not have posted what you did. There are people who are posting here who sound like Tesla paid them to promote...Tesla. Are you a paid shill for Tesla? You sound like one.
@@Avy.YT_shadowbans_commentstoo much for text. Competitors are now switching to vision only, just like elon predicted years ago. Side note; humans use vision only and they can drive.
Seems many commenters are new to the party. In comparison to the past (2023, and especially back in 2019), this CNBS piece is a love letter to Tesla - far less bias than in the past. Maybe things are finally changing (Craig Irwin notwithstanding).
This Steven Dickens guy gave clueless input. GPUs have been around since 1991 in their modern version, not 5-10 years ago as he claims and they didn't start in laptops
This is just natural evolution of a tech founder. They seek the new explosive thing. AI is new and maybe the final thing one will invest in in such a huge amuont. The money pouring into AI exeeds anything investment in the history of mankind. Billions of dollars from every single company from hardware to software to energy sources to latest and fastest chips. It is incentive for them because AI which they strive to create will itself be the new scientist, engineer, CEO, manager of the company itself.
@@thewingedringerWatch the video of OpenAI’s new model o1 step by step solving a problem that took a PhD in Physics 1 year to create a solution for and tell me you still feel the same way.
@@thewingedringer It’s the first iteration of the CyberTruck. They iterate and improve things much faster than other companies. In 10 years it will be outselling many ICE trucks.
I think the one that has share in the Space Shuttle must help with everything Elon does and Tesla the economy must be better for the planet and for everyone else in this World.
Hmm, not sure if latency is an issue in Teslas as it’s not the super computer that drives the car. The super computer is learning from the data collected by cars. Then the autonomy code is updated and the SW updated over the air.
The rampant anti-Elon bias is insane. Even the people who try to appear neutral can't help themselves. Like that guy's throwaway comment about "whatever you think about Elon... all of that is valid..." People who say this don't actually mean ALL opinions about Elon Musk are valid. No, they clearly mean that all CRITICISM of Elon Musk - no matter how false and unhinged - is automatically valid. Because ElonBad.
The fact they didn't mention elon is the REASON Nvidia stock price is so high In 2015 Elon asked them to make a chip for openAI called the A100 There's a photo of it. The whole reason this AI trend was that catalyst You have to mention this because if Tesla is wrong then surely every AI company is a waste of time
Check your facts man. A100 didn't come out until 2020. V100 came out in 2017. And large language models that rely on these chips weren't close to a thing in 2015 since the core technology of LLMs, transformers, weren't published until 2017 nor were they utilitized auto regressively until 2018.
@@biomaniac22 the V100 and A100 were made by Elon's request before he left in 2019 There's literally a photo of this and a interview with the CEO of Nvidia explaining it They were making GPUs for video games. You do realise chips takes years? The Blackwell chips are already being tested by OPENAI right now and you can't even buy them
@@biomaniac22 that's what I'm complaining about You can find the picture if you want. But if Nvidia isn't the future nor Tesla than every ai company is a waste of capital like xai or anthropic
@@Saint.Holy.Sinner He has a degree in finances and does not contribute to any of the projects he leads in any meaningful way. His biggest contribution is his pr, ie talking out of his ass. Also called a pump and dumb sheme.. which he literally does regularly with his own stock before selling it. There are few good things to say about elon personally. Not hating on the spacex or tesla staff tho, those are mostly competent.
Because Tesla is not and will never be a car company, yes it produces cars but someday, all cars around the world could use Tesla's self driving features and the only way to perfect is to collect data with the current Tesla cars and make the software smarter every day until it's perfect. Tesla could become the Nvidia of self driving technology, that would not only solve Tesla's self driving but also every other car company's car for a fee.
As usual cnbc gives a politically motivated view on Elon musks companies. Gives a negative view of Elons companies. Elon has an enviable rack record of proving his detractors wrong.
@@Devilishlybenevolentthat was one tweet literally ten years ago The boring company has nothing to do with the hyperloop Spacex did have a student hyperloop competition but TBC doesn't do that
@@Devilishlybenevolentthat was one tweet literally ten years ago The boring company has nothing to do with the hyperloop Spacex did have a student hyperloop competition but TBC doesn't do that
Elon Musk is going all-in on supercomputers to power both Tesla and xAI, and it’s clear why-AI and machine learning are the future. With Tesla's autonomous driving ambitions and xAI’s quest to develop advanced intelligence, it seems Musk is doubling down on the computing power to get ahead of the curve. 🤖👾
I agree that many people are considering NVDA as the "Stock of the year." However, I'm curious about which stocks could potentially become the next META in terms of growth over the next decade. I've allocated $200k for investment, looking for companies to make additions to boost performance
Buying a stock is easy, but buying the right stock without a time-tested strategy is incredibly hard. hence I will suggest you get yourself a financial-Advisor that can provide you with entry and exit points on best stocks to buy now or put on a watchlist
True. Having the right financial planner is invaluable. My portfolio is well-matched for every season of the market and recently hit 90% rise from early last year. I and my CFP are working on a 7 figure ballpark goal, though this could take till Q3 2024.
impressive gains! how can I get your advisor please, if you dont mind me asking? I could really use a help as of now
My CFA Lucinda Margaret Crist a renowned figure in her line of work. I recommend researching her credentials further... She has many years of experience and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market
I just looked her up on the web and I would say she really has an impressive background in investing. I will write her an email shortly.
AI stocks will dominate 2025. Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has made more than 200% from NVIDIA. I'll also take these other recommendations you made.
I agree, just because the market presents opportunities doesn't mean we should rush in headfirst. For this reason, we should look for appropriate market analysis or guidance or, alternatively, seek advice from certified market strategists.
Agreed! this is why I work with one. My $520k portfolio is well-matched for every market season yielding 85% rise from early last year to date. I and my advisor are working on more figures for this year. IMO, financial advisors are the most sought-after professionals after doctors.
I could really use the expertise of this advsors.
Her name is ’CELIA KATHLEEN MARTEL’. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.
I just curiously looked her up on the web and I would say she really has an impressive background in investing. I will write her an email shortly.
I think it's important to stick to stocks that are immune to economic policies. AI stocks that have the potential to power and transform future technologies. It seems AI is the trajectory most companies are taking, including even established FAANG companies. Maybe there are other recommendations?
I bought into NVIDIA around September last year because my financial advisor recommended it to me. She said the company is selling shovels in a gold rush. It accounted for almost 80% of my market return this year.
@@JoeWilmoth-k2w That's a great analogy and I love the insight. Professionals could make a really big difference in investing, and I think everyone should have one. There are aspects of market trends that are difficult for the untrained eyes to see.
@@IngoKociper That's a great tip. I'm setting out 50k to invest in the market this year. Any particularly useful tips you could offer to me?
@@CharliesMcCormicks The beauty of MARGARET MOLLI ALVEY approach is her dual focus: while aggressively pursuing profit opportunities, she's equally tenacious about shielding investors from potential pitfalls. It's a balance few can achieve.
@@IngoKociper I looked up her name online and found her page. I emailed and made an appointment to talk with her. Thanks for the tip.
With around £120k invested in tech/TSLA stocks, any suggestions for additional stocks to diversify across various markets? Looking for a well-rounded portfolio that balances risk aversion with returns meeting yearly inflation concerns.
Prioritize two goals: strategically sell stocks to limit losses and maximize gains, and be prepared to capitalize on market shifts. Consult a financial advisor or professional for personalized guidance.
Certainly, I've been consulting with a Certified Financial Planner (CFP) since the outbreak. Beginning with an initial fund of $80k, my advisor makes decisions on when to enter and exit positions in my portfolio, which has now expanded to around $350k.
That's incredible. Could you recommend who you work with? I really could use some help at this moment
"Julianne Iwersen Niemann" a highly respected figure in her field. I suggest delving deeper into her credentials, as she possesses extensive experience and serves as a valuable resource for individuals seeking guidance in navigating the financial market.
I’ve just looked up her full name on my browser and found her webpage, very much appreciate this
AI stocks are currently experiencing volatility, but with the right strategy and analysis, there’s significant potential for gains. Bloomberg and other financial outlets have reported cases of individuals earning over $250K in just a matter of weeks or months. It’s clear that, there’s a wealth transfer taking place-provided you know where to focus your efforts.
DCAing amongst various assets is a good strategy and can help reduce the impact of market volatility and thus a good strategy if you are looking to compound . However it is important to consider financial advisory when investing .
A lot of folks downplay the role of advlsors until being burnt by their own emotions. I remember couple summers back, after my lengthy divorce, I needed a good boost to help my business stay afloat, hence I researched for licensed advisors and came across someone of utmost qualifications. She's helped grow my reserve notwithstanding inflation, from $275k to $850K.
This is definitely considerable! think you could suggest any professional/advlsors i can get on the phone with? i'm in dire need of proper portfollo allocation
Viviana Marisa Coelho is her name. She is regarded as a genius in her area and works for Empower Financial Services. By looking her up online, you can quickly verify her level of experience. She is well knowledgeable about financial markets.
She appears to be well-educated and well-read. I ran an online search on her name and came across her website; thank you for sharing.
An exorbitant amount of water to cool them? The cooling systems are closed loop. It’s not like they’re drawing water and dumping it. It’s all about fear when it comes to CNBS.
This is false. Yes they recycle water but their demand on the water grid is still very high
Ask the citizens in Mexico about water drought due to Coca-Cola.
Clean water is a big problem. Every MEGA Factory was dropped into industrial areas that was short water before TESLA arrived and that's all over the world.
@@Just_My_Reviewscoca cola is 90 percent water not like GPUs.
My career has been in air conditioning (including industrial cooling) and energy efficiency. When they talk about water used in data centres, they are talking about water evaporated in cooling towers. A small percentage of the circulating water flow evaporates to enhance the cooling effect. Not all data centres however use open tower systems. Modern data centres run quite warm cooling water (around 18 degrees centigrade), and use air cooled systems that don’t waste any water.
Elon Musk wil succeed, he just has to keep pushing!
consistency is the key for everything I believe..
So Irwin thinks Elon Musk should give up on AI, robotics, and self-driving, and just "stick to what he knows... making EVs". This is the most ignorant comment I've heard in a long time. Someone this ignorant has no business offering business commentary on a business channel.
Does he realize he's talking about the guy who spearheaded not just the entire global EV revolution but the world's first successful privately-funded rocket company, and has massively disrupted the global launch industry, the global energy storage industry, the global communications industry, the brain-computer interface industry... the list goes on and on. But yeah, Musk should just "stick to what he knows - making EVs".
Craig Irwin is a basment dwelling SLOTH BABY
Well said. I would not bet against Musk.
Cracks are beginning to show in Musk’s empire. I for one is concerned with his metal stability.
Delulu. Musk is a snake oil salesman.
But Musk has screwed up! He bought Twitter and paid too much for it! And he has a big mouth and no family values!
We need more CEO's like Elon, this guy is revolutionizing different industries at the same time!, just imaging 40 CEO's as Elon.
Well being like Elon have its issues as why he is getting so much agro because is is disruptive so he have a lot of enemies sometimes even whole countries that hate him. Most ppl try to play safe and not make waves. Sad but true. Thats why people like him are rare.
@@ExcessumGaming How is he disruptive?
Overpromising and unverdelivering even more? Yeah no.. we can live without CEOs like Elon.
Just keep in mind that Elon has jackshit to do with what actually happens in the projects he is the face of. That's the engineers. Elon is not one of them, even if he wants you to believe that. All elon does is make up goals and hype up expectations to pump stock, then shift the promise to next year after it obviously and without fail doesnt get delivered in time.
@@AlwaysThirstyshe builds and motivates the best teams in the world.
It's his superpower.
His team's do the work and as you'll note he relentlessly thanks the teams.
Who else builds successful teams in so many different spheres of technology?
Other space obsessed, nearly going bust in the beginning, fancy homes, islands, yachts like the bloke selling books from his garage or Lp's from his transit van?
Craig Irwin is the least qualified person to be commenting on Dojo. But he helps CNBS with their continued negativity towards Tesla and Elon.
I agree, he has been historically wrong about Tesla ever since he started covering the company.
Fk Elon, Emerald mine trust fund baby that buys CEO titles
❤
💯%!!!
@@slyktech1860 Yep, he was wrong about us going to Mars, we already have 20 million humans there thanks to elon.
He was wrong about the massive taxi fleets across the world, accidents have gone down to 0 and no one has died in an auto accident for years now.
He was wrong about the hyperloop, he speculated it'd be a tunnel in vegas going 25mph, but instead its a vast system of tubes that connects the world, going 1,000 mph an hour! WE LOVE ELON!!!!!!!!!!!!
tunedbyai AI fixes this. Elon Musk bets big on supercomputers.
I have had a ride in the driverless taxis that are being compared to FSD. The Waymo is just a electric trolley. It goes on a fixed path around the city. if you want to go somewhere on the path, then you can maybe get there as long as nothing unusual is blocking you. If it gets stuck, you have to call a human who is monitoring the Waymo, and they will take over.
Cruise is limited to limited freeways that have been pre mapped. Also there has to be another car in front of you to follow. It is useful if you are going on the pre-mapped route. It is limited by speed and darkness as well. Mostly useless.
Supervised FSD will take you anywhere, no pre-mapping or forced trolley routes. In return you must still be ready to take control if you think you should. I have taken FSD trips of over 1000 miles with most of the miles under FSD control. I can't do that with Waymo or Cruise or any of the others. CNBC almost always leaves all of this out of their stories. I wonder why?
If you don't believe me, then try it for yourself.
I have tried it. FSD cut off a semi truck, coasted in the fast lane while not passing traffic, and even took a wrong exit on the highway. It was at the point where my attentiveness felt like I was a parent teaching their kid how to drive: I might as well have been driving the car.
What you listed as weaknesses for Cruise and Waymo are their strengths and why they have level 4 and 5 self driving capabilities and Tesla is stuck at Level 2.
and you watch CNBC, because?
@@biomaniac22 when OP says waymo and cruise are electric trolleys on fixed paths, he must be referring to the fact that they stay in the lanes and follow traffic rules. To him it seems Tesla's ability to ignore lanes and disregard traffic rules like a human is a feature and not a bug 😂
@@ericthorson1686 if you have to be ready to take control it's not a robotaxi and is irrelevant to the topic of robotaxis, no?
Just don't confuse human-monitored Waymo with autonomy. Waymo moved human oversight out of the car and into an office.
.@PreschoolDropout673
Elon will win
Have you’ve been on a Waymo? It’s pretty darn impressive. Tesla’s autonomous technology is certainly impressive but their approach is very inefficient. I wouldn’t take anything Musk says at face value. His near total flip flop on Dojo is a good example of that.
@@greghelton4668I feel that Elon will eventually perfect his approach at FSD and it will be the superior one, thus giving Tesla an extreme edge. He can always add the other sensors later if his approach fails, but I sincerely believe it won't
@@anthony9013 could be. The weakest point of Tesla’s approach is that vision does a lousy job in predicting distance and being blind in inclement weather. We humans are equally bad. I personally think LiDAR does add much value but nano wave radars do, and it can see in bad weather. Tesla isn’t collecting radar data in the meantime.
Typical clueless CNBC😂😂😂
lol ya. craig Irwin is a quack. imagine not knowing how to write a line of code but he's telling the software engineers who are making 5 mil a year how to build an ai model and what sensors they need to use 🤣🤣
@@James-cq9dp Coding is legit just critical thinking, that really isn't a comparitive advantage.
FSD is moving beyond coding. Coding found its limitations.. .@AlwaysThirstys
It's more than CNBS being clueless. They are pushing their poly-tic agenda which includes the Goebell's Wurming B*SS*.
Strange how often everyone is so fast to push Elon under the bus, yet he is the best bet for the future of the US auto industry. And the space industry
He is the type to burn the world if he is not the one to save it.
self driving cars are arriving next year :clown_face:
Elon belongs under the bus. He has nothing to do with any of these companies, other than owning them. He just makes promises which, mind he, he never delivers on. The engineers working there, many of which he just fired to save a billion a year, just so he can continue to ask for a 50 billion bonus payment, may or may not be very skilled.. but elon is not.
I just wonder where NASA would run to after Boeing failures😮😮 Liberals must come to terms that Musk has literally saved American innovation image.
Seems the reporter is commenting on tech that she doesn't understand
Agreed.
Absolutely correct.
How so
❤
@@BloodBaath I wouldn't expect a substantive response to your question on this comment section. CNBC isn't the forum for actual technical experts, especially on any videos involving musk or Tesla.
Amazing that this kind of reporting goes unchallenged.
10 /90... truth / BS
Go ahead, challange it. It's easy to say something is bad without giving a single example.
Which 90% parts of the video were BS?
They repeatedly jumped between FSD and Autopilot and very different years interchangeably. They effectively conflated 2017+ autopilot with 2024 FSD even though the softwares are completely different. That alone is a huge problem all throughout this video.
Additionally, they re-reported the false reporting that Elon improperly diverted Nvidia H100s to xAI. The Austin data center literally wasn’t built yet (drone video shows this) so they’re lying to people (or just grossly ignorant) when they pretend what Elon said isn’t true. The same number of H100s were diverted from xAI to Tesla when the Austin data center was built a few months later. They effectively swapped delivery dates.
Another point is pretending that Waymo is “ahead” because they offer autonomous services in a few select cities. Anyone with a basic understanding of this technology would know that tesla could geofence their software to a particular city and focus training on that if they wanted to launch something sooner. However that’s not a good approach since they are getting close to a generalized solution which Waymo has no credible path to reach (unless they high definition map every inch of road in the world).
These are just a few of the issues in this video.
Do you believe the reporting about Elon Musk’s AI ventures is inaccurate or biased? Do you believe there’s more to the story that hasn’t been adequately covered? Please enlighten us.
@@Hans-gb4mv Sure, there's the part where they said the gpus sent to XAI instead of Tesla caused Tesla to delay anything. It did not. Tesla did not have the infrastructure for those gpus yet, so they would have say unused in a warehouse. His critics think having them unused in boxes is a better use than having XAI use them.
Bring Stephanie Janis Stiefel on the show. She changed my life Financially I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Stephanie Janis Stiefel, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market.
How can i reach her, if you don't mind me asking?
Well her name is 'STEPHANIE JANIS STIEFEL'. Just research the name. You'd find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.
Been debt free for two years thanks to Stephanie Janis Stiefel. So sad to see my friends in their 40s with car loans, mortgages and credit card debt.
Thank you for putting this out looked--up STEPHANIE JANIS STIEFEL, her consuIting page came up at once, she seems highly grounded
The thing is people often doubt the prospects of financial advisors like Stephanie Janis Stiefel in business/markets today.
Well it gives me more time to get ahead while they stew in their own pity and doubts as they childishly complain about those spreading the word
That’s why build super computers in Canada. Colder country, much more water available and lots of electricity.
I'm ready for the robots to replace me at work....
No youre not but soon you wont even have a choice😂
So you are ready to give up your income?
If a robot(current time) can replace you at your workplace then that means either you have some menial job that a non-sentient robot that can do it better and cheaper than you. It means you’re one of the easily disposable workforce.
Just imagine the cost of production.Anyone can found a factory and runs it
Irwin is wrong again. LIDAR has no advantage over a multicamera system but several disadvantages, the most obvious being travel speed and cost. The faster the car travels the faster LIDAR has to rotate else it loses fidelity. Cars with LIDAR cost at least $100K more to augment and they can't even see the curb (ask Cruise about related autonomy death). China has already confirmed Elon's statement that LIDAR is a fool's errand and is deleting LIDAR from their autonomous vehicles.
You are acting like waymo don’t have camera. Waymo has camera and lidar, Tesla only have camera. At the very least waymo can do what Tesla is trying to do with only camera. Lidar just make it safer and give the model more certainty of what is in the area and what is not.
Isn't MobileEye dropping lidar and focusing on vision? Their goal is more in line with what Tesla is doing with FSD so maybe lidar doesn't work at the scale that they are working with unlike Waymo.
@@user-tx9zg5mz5p As competition heats up these will all drop LIDAR or go out of business. Plus, the centrally supervised model with highly tokenized and define maps just doesn't scale well. Plus, a change in the road due to a main break, new construction or accident incurs a response delay that is not a problem with real autonomy like FSD but definitely a problem with a centrally supervised model.
@@enigma-8uThis is incorrect since Waymo has said they can explicitly handle lane changes and rerouting due stuff like construction completely autonomously.
ua-cam.com/video/rFhzgkDGXTc/v-deo.htmlsi=0lyiaGD5fvW
@@T_Time_they dont have CARS
A lot of people talking out of their asses in this video. Same goes for the reporter that didn’t do her own research.
Don't forget musk too, constantly lying/talking out of his ass and making promises he never fulfills LOL
@@Devilishlybenevolent Elon is guilty of making amazing things with an overly optimistic timeline. Electric cars late but awesome. Rockets late but saving the US space industry. Self driving late but watch 10/10/24!
@@internationaltaichiallianc5507 Amazing things like a driving trash can that is falling apart for 100k, modern day snake oil salesman
@@internationaltaichiallianc5507 His lies gave him huge financial support. No honest people could get his level of financial support. I wonder what could have been done if those support went to honest people.
Musk never had an original idea. He just profiteers off of others
Robo taxi and other technologies Elon is working on are extremely hard but his trying unlike the people who just criticise him
Nobody forced Elon to over promise and under deliver.
@@alex_lllbut he is delivering regardless
@@anthony9013 yeah right, has been delivering next year for last 10 years
@@alex_lll Tesla's success over those 10 years says different
@@anthony9013 it's a bubble inflated by hype of never delivered promises, it will burst
Elon Musk is the real Weyland Corp!
I like Elon is responsible saying it’s a long shot instead saying this is a guarantee. Also a mini Tesla car that’s cheap would be nice
Elon Musk is a fair & genuine person. He’s truly admirable.
Dojo is just for video frames @@aaronb7990
Emma, thank you for all the support!
Craig Irwin is living in the past. There is extremely very rare phantom braking today in Tesla’s.
Send Craig to Mars
Tesla is not behind in autonomy, they are ahead. Waymo and the others are restricted to tightly controlled areas with special mapping and remote supervising operators. FSD can go anywhere and is more capable. Proof of this is already documented as Waymo was unable to follow a Tesla on FSD without 44 interventions whereas Tesla ran flawlessly.
Hey man do you know where I can. Get a job. In the field
Hey man do you know where I can. Get a job. In the field
Waymo was unable to follow Tesla on FSD sounds like a lie, why would waymo follow Tesla when they use their own mapping avoid the most difficult places. Sound you are a paid bot
Tesla FSD cannot legally drive a car/truck on a road without a human driver. (Level 2 autonomy)
Waymo cars routinely drive on regular roads without any person in the car. That is full autonomy in a geo fenced area, (Level 4).
@@bb1111116 You are referring to an operation permit level not a technical one. Technically Waymo can't leave the farm without risk of running off the road. Technically Tesla can go anywhere and has. Thousands of people all over the US already use FSD to commute with no intervention. The only restriction is eyes on the road. Robotaxi is the final step in removing that restriction.
Don't interview Craig Irwin! He's done nothing but lose lose lose oh and be wrong over and over.
obviously his innovation mind is weak !
You really shouldn't pay any attention to Craig Irwin, at least not until he is right about something. And it's not looking likely.
Agreed. Just because he believe he cant do it, doesn't mean its not possible. Thats why he's an analyst and elon musk a multi billionaire. Difference in capabilities.
@@Brian-pq2mo Wealth has little to no correlation to ability, elon musk was the same guy that got lucky because of his inheritance. The same guy that was kicked out of paypal because he wasn't doing anything. The same guy who bought twitter while pumping and dumping doge coin. The same guy that lies about living in a small home. The same guy who got carried by his board member with paypal. Same guy that is asking his company for a 4b a year- 5% of teslas total net worth.
@@Brian-pq2mo Is there a reason why none of elons promises have been either on time or completed? Difference in capabilities I would say.
Love the savagery
@@AlwaysThirstysexcuse me!?!?!?
There wasn't an EV industry till Musk, now it's the biggest industry.
People told him he was living in a sci-fi movie when he said he'll make relandable rockets, now it's a reality that few can replicate.
The model y is the best selling car in the world.
He's singlehandedly saved free speech and continues to fight for it.
Yes, his timelines are optimistic.
Idiot
You obviously don't understand the difference between geofenced and autonomous driving capabilities. You should try to somewhat understand a subject before you produce a video about it.
What's the difference?
Exactly
@@PreschoolDropout673Geofenced requires huge bulky and expensive cameras/hardware and relies on gps coordinates along with the cameras.
Tesla’s FSD acts more like a human and is able to make decisions using artificial intelligence having been trained by hundreds of millions of hours. FSD can drive in places it’s never been.
@@Sanddollar1eh, no offense but it sounds like you're not very familiar with this technology so I'll wait for OP or someone who knows what they're talking about to explain the difference to me. Thanks for trying though 🙏
@@Sanddollar1 But not safely yet. This video was not about Geofencing or autonomous driving per se - it was about Musk's investments in AI and the applications that could come of it.
Alot of bs in this, Tesla's building had delays, no place to receive chips.
@@leefox1124 true. It's very common and totally fine for the CEO of a public company to take equipment from said public company and use it at his private company. Totally legit. There was just no space at any of his massive factories to store a few pallets of gpu servers. He had no choice, if he let the hardware sit in the dock it wouldve spoiled. 🙄
@@PreschoolDropout673 Yes, and sell AI data processing back to Tesla...Nothing to see here...move along...
@@fendermon you aren't insinuating that such an honest businessman would abuse his position as CEO to embezzle money from Tesla to his own failing private projects, are you? You sir have offended the honor of every simp on this platform!
Why u have few subscribers?? You are the best teacher🐕
Elon Musk is a great man!
For me to poop on. Lol, jk
Irwin is like a broken analog clock which is right twice a day. He belongs to the same group of Tesla bears as Gordon Johnson. My Tesla Model 3 and Y already drives me to work on a daily basis. I used FSD 99% of the time from driveway to/from the company parking lot. FSD is a luxury that no other car company can offer since I have a private chauffer like the richest people in the world. It runs on my 2018 Model 3 and even better on my 2023 Model Y which both use Tesla FSD hardware 3 and the latest software version V12.5.4 :)
Please stop interviewing Craig. He's been a Tesla/Elon hater for years, and he's been wrong about both that entire time.
Saw ur recent comments. This guys an Elon dickrider
Yeah bro I love the Hyperloop that goes 500 mph, love travelling from SF to LA in just an hour!
Oh wait... Its just Teslas in a tunnel going 45mph in Vegas? Huh.
@@Devilishlybenevolentthat hasnt got anything to so with Tesla
The tunnels are business for the boring company. It hasnt finished the network and will replace the cars for it's manufacturer glass pods
You cant expect elon to choose another car brand that would be embarrassing.
Its got nothing to do with the hyperloop concept.
@@DevilishlybenevolentElon never promised or had interest to do a hyperloop ..
he said it could be done .. and encouraged others to do it ..
Same with electric airplanes..
😂
@@Devilishlybenevolent Umm, that's the Boring Tunnel. It isn't a Hyperloop, nor was it ever intended to be.
Another Elon hit piece from CNBC "journalists" with gender studies degrees lol
haaa spot on!
Requires a visionary leader to challenge and disrupt the norm. To all those skeptics out there, EV was once considered not possible or practical. See where we are today.
Elon is a treasure, not just for the US, but for humanity.
elon is a bloody moron. he wasnt even a founder of tesla, he bought his title as founder. hes also super unhinged. he just has tons of money to throw around.
Yeah, minus all the lies and the Cybertruck failure. He's a treasure for fools.
Lol
Didn't the Cybertruck outsell the F-150 Lightning by an estimated 850 vehicles in the second quarter 2024 😂
@@thewingedringerHaters gonna hate.
Never bet against Elon
Every Con Man eventually comes to an end!
@@KBTadiehare you a conman?
@@TheMagicJIZZno but I can see through one when I see it, I wasn’t born yesterday.
@@KBTadieh Conmen don’t land rockets and create the best selling car on the planet
@@stevenhill3136 best selling car on the planet?
You’ve NEVER travelled outside the US have you? Actually never outside CA have you? 🤣🤣🤣
He promised you a self driving car and that you would be on Mars by now but Americans love con artist. From Bernie Madoff to SBF so keep buying it.
1,981 days since Elon Musk said there will be a million fully autonomous Tesla robotaxis in a year. (4/22/2019)
"The fundamental message consumers should be taking today is that it's financially insane to buy anything other than a Tesla. It'll be like owning a horse in three years."
Elon Musk, quoted by Matthew J. Belvedere in CNBC
Elon musk will go down as the greatest sales man in history
* Leon
That's what Trump keeps calling him at his rallies.
I'm finding that hilarious.
Elon musk is the goat. I don’t see anyone challenging him, if you think Chinese EV companies, look again, Tesla is dominating the Chinese market, with out the traditional advertisement. Chinese customers knows who has the quality.
Especially safety. I would not buy a Chinese EV, because they have a big problem with quality control and this leads to things like spontaneous combustion and even simple things like Airbags not working (look at Serpentza's videos on this, there are so many examples in China. With Tesla there are no such issues.)
@@lawrencefrost9063 If things in china are as Serpentza's video says, there is no doubt that China has collapsed.
The reason they aren't challenging tesla is because elon gave to biggest backshot ever to the US government to implement tariffs. Tesla sales have declined in china by more than 19%. If you can't see through your own BS I don't know what you are gonna believe.
@@lawrencefrost9063 Serpentza is a known china hater, while he is right in some cases. There is inherent bias in his video that you just can't ignore and he cherry picks evidence to choose his point. (Hes sponsored by some rightwing organizations aka getting paid a salary for his videos)
Not sure why people are so negative towards Elon Musk but I am grateful to have such a genius innovator that patriotic. Imagine all the jobs,tech, or companies we wouldn't have without Musk. People hate on him because of his political opinions but everyone is suppose to be allowed to have one without being attacked. People need to get a grip.
elon musk copied everything he ever made and then take credit for it.
@@Avy.YT_shadowbans_comments LMAO...
@@rickjames18 a very professional response from you. Just like any fan of Elon musk they are quick to dismiss any criticism and prefer to come with conspiracy nonsense.
@@Avy.YT_shadowbans_comments Your comment is not one to be taken seriously. Get real. Here, Ill bite, Which companies or products did he copy? SpaceX? Tesla? Starlink? Reuseable rockets?
@@rickjames18 he wasn't even in the beginning of Tesla but still takes credit for it. neuralink technology has existed for 3 decades already. There are many ai but Tesla isn't famous for one, supercomputers has nothing to do with him. Purchased Twitter that lost him 22 billion already. And even his success is due to his employees because he never invented anything.For example he claims to have invented the idiot index but that is just another term for efficiency.
Dojo is not a bottleneck. They use more energyefficient Nvidias. The problem is their harder approach based on pure visual input. In the long run, I believe, a winning and scaleable approach
Really the argument is basically foolproof: We humans have a neuralnet and two cameras on a gimbal and we can drive fairly safely. Therefore it is possible.
@@lawrencefrost9063a computer lacks intuition, critical thinking on its own and spontaneous decision making. We can gather a lot of information because of this. If a car needs to be autonomous you need all kinds of data, more data the better and safer. Elon’s thesis will be only eaten up by his gullible rabid fan base
@@lawrencefrost9063 For a man who built his intellectual persona around first principal thinking, Musk has leaned really hard into this false dichotomy of neural nets being like human brains.
In summary, no. They both use the sum of adaptive weights to convey information. But that is about the extent of their similarity. Even within the field of neural networks there is a wide diversity concerning how this principal is applied. Relative to them, human neurons are on another planet.
Stealth hit piece. Assertions not in evidence, commentary from people with dubious track records for accurate analysis. SAD!
Interesting video, helped clarify some things for me.
It says a lot that he would drop 50 billion on a social platform but only 1 billion on super computer infrastructure
He paid for more power
Been watching Dojo since 2019! I knew about this before you. Thats right.
LOL at falling behind Waymo. These other self driving systems aren't scalable. Geofencing and lidar is a joke.
That dude Irvin is a simple minded person. One of those people who can't walk and chew gum at the same time.
Yea I was liking the video until then. Then they lost me. Everything afterwards was half truths at best.
Just like how Elon promised to delivered self driving car by 2020. Whatever happen to that. At least Waymo is driving without driver in few cities
@@RealShaktimaan Waymo is getting into accidents and stalling in the middle of the road. GM is running over people.
Elon might be late on some things, but innovation is not easy. It's more failing than success. Unless you have a better idea brewing in your basement.
@@RealShaktimaan takes time. waymo costs 5x a model 3, not sustainable sorry.
@@RealShaktimaanHe is trying to push the envelope. He sets ambitious deadlines. These problems are way harder than even he thought they were, but if you don’t set deadlines that are ambitious it will take a lot longer because people won’t push themselves.
Craigs success rate is 46%. Source tip ranks . 😂
So he is less effective than a random coin toss.
One thing you gotta understand is, even with a 50% rate, you can still make a lot of money....
The greatest person who ever lived. Hope he succeeds in at least half of what he plans.
Classical hit job by CNBC against Musk.
Google just smashed all supercomputers, it's a whole new game!
Because betting on sending human to Mars has evaporated along with billion dollars of investors money.
how long have you been trading binary options? Your success is inspiring.
I have a TSLA bag of 40k.. and I'm riding it all the way till the next decade, I'll update you guys, I promise!
Same, so happy tesla lobbied the US government to support their monopoly.
Elon is brash, egotistical, and says what he wants on social that angers some people online. But it doesn’t change the fact the man is a true visionary. He sees things differently than average person. He is not just about profits. He is truly thinking about changing the world. Everyone is all talk. He is action. People on social are so polarized, that just because you don’t like someone, they automatically dismiss the facts.
Everyone under the sun is trying to make humanoid robots. They will be working among humans whether people like it or not. We need US companies to be making them. It’s a matter of national security because China will take that market before we even enter it.
It's only the woke Dems that disregard facts .. 😂
Elon whole history is just talk, over promising things that never come: mars trip, hyperloop, 40k cybertruck, self-drvingin cars. Teslas fleet of cars is aging and outdated, twitter has lost 75% of value, SpaceX will not go to Mars anytime this decade,
Don’t bet against Elon . . . Not a good idea! 😂
Why? Just curious, but can you name one thing he ever delivered on? He overpromises stuff "next year" to pump the stock, then shifts the same promise back a year. Rinse and repeat. He just never delivers on anything. Self driving cars, across the entire country / world, with no human intervention, safer than humans driving, were promised "next year" since 2016. Fast forward to 2024, even the summon feature, which basically is the car driving itself, has been disabled. And the last state was that it had troubles reliably being summoned across one parking lot.. let alone actually going across streets. This is about as much of a cliff between promise and reality as is gets, and somehow people still buy his bullcrap lmfao.
Elon has been talking about AI for years longer than any other prominent tech figure.
This is not new for him
Elon is talking a lot. That's the issue.
Forget FSD,
Work on Full-Self-Schooling,
So we can sleep in late and skip class.
Very informative piece. I liked that it didn’t feel biased or click baity.
I guess the MSM is BEGINNING to shift a little on Elon. Just a little. Don't get your hopes up.
Lol that's a good one ..😂😂😂
Shorting some of my $TSLA stock to secure profits, but I'm retaining a portion for the long term. Tesla's growth potential remains robust. I'm considering diversifying my $200K stock portfolio, but I'm uncertain about managing risks in my next move.
Everyone needs a Margin of Safety in their portfolios and just remember, It's time in the market versus timing the market.
De-risk your portfolios, shore up your core holdings, and take some profits while balancing your portfolio allocations. I’d also suggest you go with a managed portfolio, but even those don’t perform so well, so it’s best you reach out to a proper fiduciary to guide you, that’s what works for my spouse and I. We've made over 80% capital growth minus dividends.
I've heard similar things about hiring an advisor. It's hard to choose one that's very good though. Could you make some useful recommendations?
I've stuck with the popularly ‘’Monica Shawn Marti” for about five years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive. She’s quite known in her field, I agree with her.
I really appreciate your useful advice. I was able to set up a call with her and confirm her identity. She seems incredibly knowledgeable, and I hope I'm able to connect with her.
Since the '60s, supercomputers went from top-secret gov stuff to running self-driving cars and chatty AI.
Critics that say Tesla is just a car company are woefully uninformed. When you look at who's ahead regarding self-driving cars you have to compare apples to apples. Waymo drives in highly structured environments. Mercedes has level two but only on highways. The only company creating a self-driving car that can drive anywhere is Tesla.
What's more, Tesla's approach using cameras and AI is precisely the way humans Drive. The same people down on Tesla are decrying the dangers of AI domination. It's absurd to suggest that an AI smarter than a human won't be able to drive a car with eight cameras. Given that fact, It's only a matter of WHEN Tesla's FSD will happen not if.
FSD an incredibly difficult problem to solve and the fact Elon Musk is overly optimistic about when it will arrive is understandable. We should not give any oxygen to those on the sidelines criticizing those in the arena pushing Humanity forward.
Regardless Tesla will succeed in the long run. Tesla is on the right course to be a mega successful company
Now I see why they said he is gonna be a trillionaire.
Craig is a clown
elon is a clown
@@JJJohnson441 did he hurt your feelings?
elon fan boys are clowns
If elon said something he will do it❤❤
My Tesla shares soaring higher and higher love it
$TSLA is extremely volatile.
Im currently unemployed. Seeking employment in the tech industry.Anyone know an easy way to gEt into the field
That depends on way too many factors for anybody to help you. Like.. where do you even live, what experience do you have and so on.
The usual approach is to just look for job ads and go from there. Unless you know someone who can open a door for you, of course, which is the easiest way.
There are some hugely ignorant sections in this piece. Tesla is by far the leader in non-Geo fence self driving.
That's not saying much, because the cars still don't perform as they should. Being the leader isn't enough; the car has to perform reliably and safely in all kinds of scenarios, over and over again, and Tesla's not there yet. A competent autonomous design would use more than just the optical band. For example, taking input from both optical cameras and a passive infra-red camera would prevent the kinds of crashes we have seen with Tesla vehicles in many situations. Now, infrared is not perfect. We have a Night Vision system on our car, and its performance is degraded in heavy rain and snow. But having a computer check inputs from one part of the EM spectrum against another reduces the chances of misinterpretation. (This happens in fighter jets too. For example, Navy pilots flying the F-14D Super Tomcat used its Infrared Spot and Track system to reacquire targets that managed to break the lockon of the APG-71's Doppler mode, enabling them to reacquire the target with the radar) Until I see that kind of improvement, I'm sticking with cars whose technology is there to help the driver drive the car. Those cars do have some useful autonomous feature - for example, you get out of the car, close the door, hit a button and the car parks itself. Later, you come back, hit a button, and the car pulls out of the parking spot and pulls up next to you. Or the car automatically reverses out of a parking garage with a twisty, windy path that it recorded when you pulled into the parking spot. Those autonomous functions happen at slow speed; they are NHTSA certified, and the worst that can happen, generally is a minor fender-bender. I can trust that. Will Tesla (and others) get to a place where we can trust it? At some point in the future.
@@ronaryel6445 thanks Captain obvious but overall you don't know enough on the subject. I'm not trying to be combative but it sounds like you just started following the Tesla story last week.
@@artinweddings Wrong, sweetheart, I know enough about it to keep up with you, and you have no clue how long I've followed it. If what I said were so obvious you would not have posted what you did. There are people who are posting here who sound like Tesla paid them to promote...Tesla. Are you a paid shill for Tesla? You sound like one.
@@artinweddings how about add information to the table instead of dismissing any criticism?
@@Avy.YT_shadowbans_commentstoo much for text. Competitors are now switching to vision only, just like elon predicted years ago. Side note; humans use vision only and they can drive.
Seems many commenters are new to the party. In comparison to the past (2023, and especially back in 2019), this CNBS piece is a love letter to Tesla - far less bias than in the past. Maybe things are finally changing (Craig Irwin notwithstanding).
This Steven Dickens guy gave clueless input. GPUs have been around since 1991 in their modern version, not 5-10 years ago as he claims and they didn't start in laptops
He added nothing to the conversation and wasn’t even accurate.
They really did a terrible job with this reporting, very sloppy.
This explains a lot: Editorial Support: Lora Kolodny.
This is just natural evolution of a tech founder. They seek the new explosive thing. AI is new and maybe the final thing one will invest in in such a huge amuont. The money pouring into AI exeeds anything investment in the history of mankind. Billions of dollars from every single company from hardware to software to energy sources to latest and fastest chips. It is incentive for them because AI which they strive to create will itself be the new scientist, engineer, CEO, manager of the company itself.
Generative AI is a dead end. It has no future. It's just wasting money and jumping on the hottest thing.
@@thewingedringerWatch the video of OpenAI’s new model o1 step by step solving a problem that took a PhD in Physics 1 year to create a solution for and tell me you still feel the same way.
Good thing you showed headlines that are 2-4 years old.
Also, anybody can “blame” Autopilot. I can also blame the man in the moon.
Don’t bet against Elon or you will lose
People bet against the Cybertruck and they didn't lose.
@@thewingedringer Well I guess they didn’t “bet” anything then lol the Cybertruck is been nothing but a success
I always do ❗ BECAUSE I'M BETTER THAN HIM
@@thewingedringer It’s the first iteration of the CyberTruck. They iterate and improve things much faster than other companies. In 10 years it will be outselling many ICE trucks.
😂
I think the one that has share in the Space Shuttle must help with everything Elon does and Tesla the economy must be better for the planet and for everyone else in this World.
what a nonsense hit piece. Lidar is dead and they claim "they must add lidar!"
Robot brick layers and other labour intensive jobs would be a strong point.
There is so much incorrect information in this video that it hurts. Dojo is a training computer, not a "supercomputer."
Hmm, not sure if latency is an issue in Teslas as it’s not the super computer that drives the car. The super computer is learning from the data collected by cars. Then the autonomy code is updated and the SW updated over the air.
The rampant anti-Elon bias is insane. Even the people who try to appear neutral can't help themselves. Like that guy's throwaway comment about "whatever you think about Elon... all of that is valid..." People who say this don't actually mean ALL opinions about Elon Musk are valid. No, they clearly mean that all CRITICISM of Elon Musk - no matter how false and unhinged - is automatically valid. Because ElonBad.
What is good about Elon, specifically?
It blows my mind too man
Awesome Craig Irwin!! Read the news dude!! lol
The fact they didn't mention elon is the REASON Nvidia stock price is so high
In 2015 Elon asked them to make a chip for openAI called the A100
There's a photo of it. The whole reason this AI trend was that catalyst
You have to mention this because if Tesla is wrong then surely every AI company is a waste of time
Check your facts man. A100 didn't come out until 2020. V100 came out in 2017. And large language models that rely on these chips weren't close to a thing in 2015 since the core technology of LLMs, transformers, weren't published until 2017 nor were they utilitized auto regressively until 2018.
@@biomaniac22 the V100 and A100 were made by Elon's request before he left in 2019
There's literally a photo of this and a interview with the CEO of Nvidia explaining it
They were making GPUs for video games. You do realise chips takes years?
The Blackwell chips are already being tested by OPENAI right now and you can't even buy them
@@TheMagicJIZZ No where in that video does it say Elon asked them to make any of the 100 series cards.
@@biomaniac22 that's what I'm complaining about
You can find the picture if you want. But if Nvidia isn't the future nor Tesla than every ai company is a waste of capital like xai or anthropic
Complete misinformation, tesla is a fraction of nvidias profits lmao.
Hilarious that inside a self-driving car the guy needs to write text messages with his thumbs.
The best CEO in america alive today, him, mark and jensen, unstoppable.
You forget not to count me out on this conversation my friend
To the moon!
Craig is in no way qualified to be talking about AI/machine learning lol
Neither is Elon tho..
@@Yamyatos he is a tech and futurist guy he is extremely qualified
@@Saint.Holy.Sinner He has a degree in finances and does not contribute to any of the projects he leads in any meaningful way. His biggest contribution is his pr, ie talking out of his ass. Also called a pump and dumb sheme.. which he literally does regularly with his own stock before selling it. There are few good things to say about elon personally. Not hating on the spacex or tesla staff tho, those are mostly competent.
Tesla not having LIDAR is the biggest mistake they made.
So their biggest mistake was supposedly not creating a car that costs $250,000 like waymo? 😂
Because Tesla is not and will never be a car company, yes it produces cars but someday, all cars around the world could use Tesla's self driving features and the only way to perfect is to collect data with the current Tesla cars and make the software smarter every day until it's perfect.
Tesla could become the Nvidia of self driving technology, that would not only solve Tesla's self driving but also every other car company's car for a fee.
Good job elon
As usual cnbc gives a politically motivated view on Elon musks companies. Gives a negative view of Elons companies. Elon has an enviable rack record of proving his detractors wrong.
Ah yes like the hyper loop, the tunnel system of teslas going 25mph in vegas, truly revolutionary!
@@Devilishlybenevolentthat was one tweet literally ten years ago
The boring company has nothing to do with the hyperloop
Spacex did have a student hyperloop competition but TBC doesn't do that
@@Devilishlybenevolentthat was one tweet literally ten years ago
The boring company has nothing to do with the hyperloop
Spacex did have a student hyperloop competition but TBC doesn't do that
Getting someone who doesn’t know what they’re talking about then trying to act like they know what Tesla is thinking don’t make any sense
Meanwhile, U.S. politicians are bringing more people from the south and creating 324 new génders.😢😢
FsD is an order of magnitude more advanced than the solutions offered by Waymo or any other organization.
SKYNET INCOMING! 🤖
yes
Elon Musk is going all-in on supercomputers to power both Tesla and xAI, and it’s clear why-AI and machine learning are the future. With Tesla's autonomous driving ambitions and xAI’s quest to develop advanced intelligence, it seems Musk is doubling down on the computing power to get ahead of the curve. 🤖👾
Typical garbage reporting. No understanding of the subject matter whatsoever.