This was an honest breakdown, and although you preferred Sony historically, you didn’t allow brand loyalty to explore what you needed in another tool. Well done!
Good info on these systems. As a Nikon user for years, I picked up a Sony FX30 for video use when I was experiencing auto focus issues with my Z6 II, when recording videos for my YT channel I later got the A7R V and ended up trading it for the Z8. While I'm not a fan of the FX30's colors out of the camera, I find I can use SLog and then grade to get a better look, A7R V was much better and close to Nikon's WB look. For me, traveling around South East Asia, the fan in the FX30, the audio handle, video capabilities and the smaller footprint, is why I chose to keep it. I agree there is some noise in low light situations but that isn't a big thing and can be handled in software (I use Resolve) however, the FX30 has better stabilization and a better quality screen (though I wished it had the A7R V's screen) than the A7 IV. Let's hope Panasonic can tweak the AF on their cameras some more, I started my YT channel with a Panasonic HC-X1 camcorder and I liked how the colors looked from it. I'm curious to see what the upcoming S1 II cameras will bring.
@@adamtalkstech It should be out before summer, hopefully. Leica released their SL3 which is what the S1 R should be based on, when the SL3 S hits, then we know the S1H won't be far behind.
I had the A7iv and then sold it for the FX30. I did start filmmaking with the Panasonic GH5. And I loved it for the colors and skin tones. Regarding lenses, I pretty much stick with primes and occasionally a zoom. But, the S5iix ability to record to an SSD is a great benefit. And I can also connect it to a Blackmagic 12G monitor to record BRAW. Having had the BMPCC4K, I really loved working with BRAW. To me the image coming out of the BMPCC4K had a nice warm film like look to it. I still haven't decided on when I would get the S5iix. But, it is definitely a choice I am seriously considering.
have you gotten it, having used the fx30, although i have the zv-e1 I had a g9, gh5 brother and I loved it way more minus auto focus and low light performance
Thanks for this and it was a very good video! About the autofocus, had you upgraded to the firmware Ver.2.0 (3.0 for the S5ii) when you analysed the performance and occasional defocusing? Have you checked the v2.1 update and if so, has that helped?
Thanks for the video. I own an S1 and S5 (original) and sometimes think that I should have gone with Sony full frame (I do own three sony aps-c cameras... got to get around to selling them). The thing that makes the a7 IV a no-go is the (potential) overheating. I have had overheating issues with my a5100, a6000 and a6500 cameras and it's just unacceptable. I know that there are SOME people who shoot a lot with the a7 IV and NEVER have overheating issues. But then there some people who have overheating issues on it real quickly despite the normal precautions. It just seems like there is no rhyme or reason as to when the cameras might overheat. (Gerald Undone recently did a video on overheating and he said that there was basically no way to predict how long a camera would last before overheating.)
Yeah the A7IV still randomly shuts off on me, never for overheating though, the light hasn't come on for me on the screen. But it was shutting off while filming talking head and that was the nail in the coffin for me on shooting long form with it. Will be really interesting to see what the S1M2 has to offer. Lumix still needs that next level of camera, but you could argue minus the 4k60 crop and no 4k120, the S5 II/x are both super close to the a7siii
Hello Adam, Thank you for the fantastic video! It was really helpful. I’m looking for a camera for my teaching lectures, where I’ll be standing in front of a whiteboard. I want to ensure that the focus is on both me and the whiteboard while I’m writing. Would it be better to use the FX30, or do you think the Lumix S5II would handle autofocus well in this scenario? Also, what lens would you recommend for the Lumix for this purpose? Thanks!
In that case I would just focus on the white board with either camera I think. Then no weird pulsing. The lumix would be sharper but potentially have more moire
Once you use anamorphic on one you’ll never go back. I just got an S5ii x and I still have my a7siii and using anamorphic on the lumix is wayyyyy better. The stabilization alone is worth it!
Why not just get an FX3? Not 6k, but the 4k 120fps footage looks amazing, I haven't had any issues with image quality. I have an A7IV too as a b-cam but yeah the FX3 low (800) and high ISO (12800) is flawless. Although I understand the SSD solution.
Open gate was the main thing I've been wanting for a year now. and just the impending release of the FX3 m2 kept me from wanting to go all in on it, but believe me, I wanted the FX3 for over a year now too lol. I could shoot almost everything I do with the FX3+ 20-70F4 and 24mm f 1.4
@@adamtalkstech yep open gate is definitely worth it, hopefully the FX3 II will have 6k open gate and also built in ND 😅 but yeah the FX3 is a beast camera with the dual ISO in slog3. I just recently sold my 24-70 Sigma and 70-180 Tamron to get a 35-150 f2-2.8 Tamron and it just stays on my FX3 all the time for video work. And if I need to go wider I use my Sony 16-35 GM… (I use my primes on the A7IV).
Thanks for this review and finally somebody noticed the exposure issue when the shutter is half pressed, it's very annoying! In low light the screen actually darkens and will go completely dark if the light levels get low enough, hopefully it's something Panasonic address.
This happens on my G9 but not on the S1, and I find it super annoying. Right when I take a shot it changes how it looks, and I wonder "did I get the shot? Is the exposure right?" I really want to like this camera, but there are some quality of life issues. Thx for highlighting it Adam.
THE FATAL FLAW that killed it for me was that the camera "forgets" the focus point in MF mode when switched off and on ( when using non focus clutch lenses ) !
well believe it or not it's probably impossible for sony to make a medium format camera with their e mount because they can only barely fit a full frame sensor in it so sony might have to add a new mounting system if they ever made one
I've owned the S5iiX for almost a full year and it's incredible. For those interested I've got a long term review up on my channel. It's seriously such a great camera.
I just listed my FX30 in eBay because the FX30 is deliberately crippled by Sony because they have to protect the FX3. FX30, hardware wise is capable of 6k30 open gate. It is capable of 6k recording 16x9. They will NEVER let You because then it could outshine the FX3 which brings in a lot of money for them.
Yeah, for me that + the noise have been the two biggest annoyances with the FX30 which is sad because I love that camera and it's so usable overall, but I need to put mine on ebay soon. I wish Lumix had a 20-70 F4 lens like sony, I just got the 24-105 L mount and love it but that thing is huge.
@@adamtalkstechI hate everything about it the more I used it. You can’t white balance of a white card when using your memory recall modes. As a still camera it is unnecessarily CRIPPLED beyond a joke. Convenient mode dials replaced with buttons…. Yeah I will not miss this camera lol. You are 100% right though about the LMount - not enough options and very expensive BUT the 20-60 kit lense is ridiculously GOOD!!!! Hard to justify $2,000 on a new LMount lens.
The S5ii/x is better value for money. I have always used Lumix cameras. Personally think Sony and Canon are only wanted as its what UA-camrs 'content creator's ' use. Always said Sony and Canon are bought for branding. Its cool to say you use Sony or Canon. Lumix is now being talked about more and Sony nor Canon can make a camera that has the same Specs as S5ii for the price
Canon has been the standard forever and then Sony started blowing people’s minds (mine included) with features and performance. The s5ii feels like what Sony felt like in 2017 to me. The more I use the s5 ii x the more u like it. I leave it on for hours and don’t have to worry about overheating and it always just delivers insane quality
@@adamtalkstech Canon was the standers for Photos. Still is the brand that is best for photos. Sony was more for video then the GH5 came out. A camera that had a smaller sensor yet had 4k 60. A true mirrorless body. Sony release the a7iii. A FF in a mirrorless body. I always said imagine if the GH5 had the same AF as the Sony a7ii it would be an even better camera. Now the S5ii/x and all lumix cameras will have the PDAF. And the cameras will always be cheaper then Sony or Canon cameras. It's great to see people like you switching to it. When Sony brings out a new camera they won't be able to match the price of any Lumix cameras. Where lumix will only bring out better cameras for a price that is cheaper then Sony or Conon.
Since you don't want to say that one camera is better than another I will. Sony absolutely destroys Lumix with autofocus. Lumix absolutely destroys Sony with video capture options. And Olympus completely destroys both with in body image stabilization. I'm so tired of Sony people and Lumix people talking about in body image stabilization. After using Olympus for years. I pick up a Lumix or Sony camera and wonder whether or not the in body image stabilization is even on.
Interesting. I agree on autofocus. LUMIX is passable but doesn’t blow my mind. I haven’t tried Olympus so can’t comment on their stabilization but lumix stabilization crushes Sony.
@@Bigcookfilms Back in the day. Head to Head. Micro 4/3 Olympus. Versus micro 4/3 Lumix. Olympus in body image stabilization destroyed Lumix. Not even close. Olympus and Lumix should have gotten together. Shared more engineering. I waited for Olympus cameras to have better video and Lumix cameras to have better autofocus and for their lenses to support both cameras combined stabilization. But. I got tired of waiting and bought a Sony. Smart move for Lumix to go full frame. Love their S5IIX. But it seems like the same people at Lumix who wanted their micro 4/3 cameras autofocus to be average against Olympus. Now want their full frame cameras autofocus to be average against Sony.
I had the s5II and is not better than his Sony counterpart why? Terrible skin tones, oversharp image even in vlog but specially in the normal profiles making them useless. The s5II vs fx30 for example in lowlight, you can see less noise in the s5II, but also a lot less of detail, cause Panasonic apply a noise reduction imposible to turn of that kill all the detail, and make the image look like an smartphone , 🎉if you connect an external monitor you will get a noise impossible to fix in post. Very laggy camera several seconds to start and review video. The most expensive 1.8 primes in the market. And the last thing, Panasonic virtually have gift the s5iix for free to every single UA-cam creator. Now I’m asking this, if your camera is soo good, why you need to do this?
What lenses would you want? It’s not as good as Sony but I’ve tried 6 of the Panasonic lenses and been able to find exactly what I needed minus the fact most of the primes are 1.8 instead of 1.4. I do wish they had a 20-70 f4 like Sony does though :)
always stop and check what meets your production needs before making a big change. I really needed the open gate shooting for how I’m capturing content now.
Welcome to the Lumix gang!
Already loving it! Shot a few hundred videos with the s5ii x and it is a certified beast
This was an honest breakdown, and although you preferred Sony historically, you didn’t allow brand loyalty to explore what you needed in another tool. Well done!
Yup I’m still holding onto a little Sony gear for now… but depending on what Sony/Panasonic releases for the next camera I may go all in on Panasonic.
@@adamtalkstech I totally feel you on that! Thanks for taking the time to create the video, share your experience and respond! 👍🏽
Good info on these systems. As a Nikon user for years, I picked up a Sony FX30 for video use when I was experiencing auto focus issues with my Z6 II, when recording videos for my YT channel I later got the A7R V and ended up trading it for the Z8. While I'm not a fan of the FX30's colors out of the camera, I find I can use SLog and then grade to get a better look, A7R V was much better and close to Nikon's WB look. For me, traveling around South East Asia, the fan in the FX30, the audio handle, video capabilities and the smaller footprint, is why I chose to keep it. I agree there is some noise in low light situations but that isn't a big thing and can be handled in software (I use Resolve) however, the FX30 has better stabilization and a better quality screen (though I wished it had the A7R V's screen) than the A7 IV. Let's hope Panasonic can tweak the AF on their cameras some more, I started my YT channel with a Panasonic HC-X1 camcorder and I liked how the colors looked from it. I'm curious to see what the upcoming S1 II cameras will bring.
Yeah I want to sell my FX30 and wait for the S1 II, but who knows when Panasonic will release it.
@@adamtalkstech It should be out before summer, hopefully. Leica released their SL3 which is what the S1 R should be based on, when the SL3 S hits, then we know the S1H won't be far behind.
What about the moire in s5iix?
definitely an issue in some situations. hasn't been an issue for the way I shoot yet.
I had the A7iv and then sold it for the FX30. I did start filmmaking with the Panasonic GH5. And I loved it for the colors and skin tones. Regarding lenses, I pretty much stick with primes and occasionally a zoom. But, the S5iix ability to record to an SSD is a great benefit. And I can also connect it to a Blackmagic 12G monitor to record BRAW. Having had the BMPCC4K, I really loved working with BRAW. To me the image coming out of the BMPCC4K had a nice warm film like look to it. I still haven't decided on when I would get the S5iix. But, it is definitely a choice I am seriously considering.
You on the fx30 these days? S5ii x slays it in every area except autofocus and some speed of power on sort of things
have you gotten it, having used the fx30, although i have the zv-e1 I had a g9, gh5 brother and I loved it way more minus auto focus and low light performance
Thanks for this and it was a very good video! About the autofocus, had you upgraded to the firmware Ver.2.0 (3.0 for the S5ii) when you analysed the performance and occasional defocusing? Have you checked the v2.1 update and if so, has that helped?
It’s better. I also understand the modes better now but still have some frustrations with it
Thanks for the video. I own an S1 and S5 (original) and sometimes think that I should have gone with Sony full frame (I do own three sony aps-c cameras... got to get around to selling them). The thing that makes the a7 IV a no-go is the (potential) overheating. I have had overheating issues with my a5100, a6000 and a6500 cameras and it's just unacceptable. I know that there are SOME people who shoot a lot with the a7 IV and NEVER have overheating issues. But then there some people who have overheating issues on it real quickly despite the normal precautions. It just seems like there is no rhyme or reason as to when the cameras might overheat. (Gerald Undone recently did a video on overheating and he said that there was basically no way to predict how long a camera would last before overheating.)
Yeah the A7IV still randomly shuts off on me, never for overheating though, the light hasn't come on for me on the screen. But it was shutting off while filming talking head and that was the nail in the coffin for me on shooting long form with it.
Will be really interesting to see what the S1M2 has to offer. Lumix still needs that next level of camera, but you could argue minus the 4k60 crop and no 4k120, the S5 II/x are both super close to the a7siii
Hello Adam,
Thank you for the fantastic video! It was really helpful.
I’m looking for a camera for my teaching lectures, where I’ll be standing in front of a whiteboard. I want to ensure that the focus is on both me and the whiteboard while I’m writing. Would it be better to use the FX30, or do you think the Lumix S5II would handle autofocus well in this scenario? Also, what lens would you recommend for the Lumix for this purpose?
Thanks!
In that case I would just focus on the white board with either camera I think. Then no weird pulsing. The lumix would be sharper but potentially have more moire
Better to go with the S5iiX over the S5II? I have the money for both, not sure if I need all the features of the X other than SSD though
Yes the ssd recording is worth it. And the blackout text on the front hah
If you haven't gotten one yet get the S5ii the extra money you save can go towards a lens and extras.
This man makes really good videos, I wonder why he still has less than 10k subs
Working on it!
Hi Adam. I really enjoy your concise and to-the-point videos. Well done!
Thanks so much for the comment!! Means a lot to me
#LumixGang Lets goooo!
Aw yeah!!
How does estabilization work with open gate? Does it crop in slightly?
I use the standard stabilization and I think crop only applies to the active mode
S5IIx is really compelling for my anamorphic lenses.
I’ve never tried anamorphic but seems super cool!
Once you use anamorphic on one you’ll never go back. I just got an S5ii x and I still have my a7siii and using anamorphic on the lumix is wayyyyy better. The stabilization alone is worth it!
So interesting. Thank You for this video. I have just subscribed. :) Best regards, Kai the bee filmer.
Thanks for the sub!
Crazy to see the fx30 noise…. I’m happy I went with lumix system for the same price and full frame
Yeah it's insane how bad it is... I thought I was doing something wrong but my settings and recording modes did not affect how noisy it was for me
Why not just get an FX3? Not 6k, but the 4k 120fps footage looks amazing, I haven't had any issues with image quality. I have an A7IV too as a b-cam but yeah the FX3 low (800) and high ISO (12800) is flawless. Although I understand the SSD solution.
Open gate was the main thing I've been wanting for a year now. and just the impending release of the FX3 m2 kept me from wanting to go all in on it, but believe me, I wanted the FX3 for over a year now too lol. I could shoot almost everything I do with the FX3+ 20-70F4 and 24mm f 1.4
@@adamtalkstech yep open gate is definitely worth it, hopefully the FX3 II will have 6k open gate and also built in ND 😅 but yeah the FX3 is a beast camera with the dual ISO in slog3. I just recently sold my 24-70 Sigma and 70-180 Tamron to get a 35-150 f2-2.8 Tamron and it just stays on my FX3 all the time for video work. And if I need to go wider I use my Sony 16-35 GM… (I use my primes on the A7IV).
Thanks for this review and finally somebody noticed the exposure issue when the shutter is half pressed, it's very annoying! In low light the screen actually darkens and will go completely dark if the light levels get low enough, hopefully it's something Panasonic address.
Yeah, it's really annoying. I talked to some other videographer friends and they said it didn't bother them, but I definitely don't like that
This happens on my G9 but not on the S1, and I find it super annoying. Right when I take a shot it changes how it looks, and I wonder "did I get the shot? Is the exposure right?" I really want to like this camera, but there are some quality of life issues. Thx for highlighting it Adam.
glad to see you've got yours rigged out with the @KondorBlue handle!
Yup working on some more rigging ideas to use it with the xlr adapter but love that handle
i did the same 2 months ago! Happier than ever
THE FATAL FLAW that killed it for me was that the camera "forgets" the focus point in MF mode when switched off and on ( when using non focus clutch lenses ) !
Yeah the AF system is still weird to me. I haven't fully gotten used to it yet.
well believe it or not it's probably impossible for sony to make a medium format camera with their e mount because they can only barely fit a full frame sensor in it so sony might have to add a new mounting system if they ever made one
True, can still do a lot with e mount though.
I've owned the S5iiX for almost a full year and it's incredible. For those interested I've got a long term review up on my channel. It's seriously such a great camera.
Lumix Forever!
I’ll be happy if I can stick with LUMIX as long as I was with Sony 😬
I just listed my FX30 in eBay because the FX30 is deliberately crippled by Sony because they have to protect the FX3.
FX30, hardware wise is capable of 6k30 open gate. It is capable of 6k recording 16x9. They will NEVER let
You because then it could outshine the FX3 which brings in a lot of money for them.
Yeah, for me that + the noise have been the two biggest annoyances with the FX30 which is sad because I love that camera and it's so usable overall, but I need to put mine on ebay soon. I wish Lumix had a 20-70 F4 lens like sony, I just got the 24-105 L mount and love it but that thing is huge.
@@adamtalkstechI hate everything about it the more I used it. You can’t white balance of a white card when using your memory recall modes. As a still camera it is unnecessarily CRIPPLED beyond a joke. Convenient mode dials replaced with buttons…. Yeah I will not miss this camera lol. You are 100% right though about the LMount - not enough options and very expensive BUT the 20-60 kit lense is ridiculously GOOD!!!! Hard to justify $2,000 on a new LMount lens.
if this camera would have atleast the 33mp from sony a7iv i’d swap to lumix too
Yeah the 33mp is nice but I shot on the a7iii for years and it was always fine
FX3 should have been the side step, fixes and issues with those other cameras. Crop factor, noise, video features
You aren't wrong, I do wish it had open gate + SSD recording though. the content I am shooting right now I really needed open gate for.
Dude, the exposure thing was SO weird. Not a deal breaker by any stretch but like....did no one on the design team think that was weird?
It is still bothering me a year later lol. 😂 must be some sort of technical limitation.
The S5ii/x is better value for money. I have always used Lumix cameras. Personally think Sony and Canon are only wanted as its what UA-camrs 'content creator's ' use. Always said Sony and Canon are bought for branding. Its cool to say you use Sony or Canon. Lumix is now being talked about more and Sony nor Canon can make a camera that has the same Specs as S5ii for the price
Canon has been the standard forever and then Sony started blowing people’s minds (mine included) with features and performance. The s5ii feels like what Sony felt like in 2017 to me. The more I use the s5 ii x the more u like it. I leave it on for hours and don’t have to worry about overheating and it always just delivers insane quality
@@adamtalkstech Canon was the standers for Photos. Still is the brand that is best for photos. Sony was more for video then the GH5 came out. A camera that had a smaller sensor yet had 4k 60. A true mirrorless body. Sony release the a7iii. A FF in a mirrorless body. I always said imagine if the GH5 had the same AF as the Sony a7ii it would be an even better camera. Now the S5ii/x and all lumix cameras will have the PDAF. And the cameras will always be cheaper then Sony or Canon cameras. It's great to see people like you switching to it. When Sony brings out a new camera they won't be able to match the price of any Lumix cameras. Where lumix will only bring out better cameras for a price that is cheaper then Sony or Conon.
Since you don't want to say that one camera is better than another I will. Sony absolutely destroys Lumix with autofocus. Lumix absolutely destroys Sony with video capture options. And Olympus completely destroys both with in body image stabilization. I'm so tired of Sony people and Lumix people talking about in body image stabilization. After using Olympus for years. I pick up a Lumix or Sony camera and wonder whether or not the in body image stabilization is even on.
Interesting. I agree on autofocus. LUMIX is passable but doesn’t blow my mind. I haven’t tried Olympus so can’t comment on their stabilization but lumix stabilization crushes Sony.
Olympus has the best ibis but they don’t make full frame or Apsc sensor cameras.😊
@@Bigcookfilms Back in the day. Head to Head. Micro 4/3 Olympus. Versus micro 4/3 Lumix. Olympus in body image stabilization destroyed Lumix. Not even close. Olympus and Lumix should have gotten together. Shared more engineering. I waited for Olympus cameras to have better video and Lumix cameras to have better autofocus and for their lenses to support both cameras combined stabilization. But. I got tired of waiting and bought a Sony. Smart move for Lumix to go full frame. Love their S5IIX. But it seems like the same people at Lumix who wanted their micro 4/3 cameras autofocus to be average against Olympus. Now want their full frame cameras autofocus to be average against Sony.
I had the s5II and is not better than his Sony counterpart why? Terrible skin tones, oversharp image even in vlog but specially in the normal profiles making them useless. The s5II vs fx30 for example in lowlight, you can see less noise in the s5II, but also a lot less of detail, cause Panasonic apply a noise reduction imposible to turn of that kill all the detail, and make the image look like an smartphone , 🎉if you connect an external monitor you will get a noise impossible to fix in post. Very laggy camera several seconds to start and review video. The most expensive 1.8 primes in the market. And the last thing, Panasonic virtually have gift the s5iix for free to every single UA-cam creator. Now I’m asking this, if your camera is soo good, why you need to do this?
Not sure I agree after the brand new firmware update. AF is a large leap after the firmware upgrade that it’s like a brand new camera.
but the colors from the vlog is bad i would say..
red look yellwo or orange compare to clog and slog3..
I haven’t tried it yet but I’ve heard nothing but good things about v log
If only Sony would just have open gate. I don't understand why its not there yet.
Honestly that and better stabilization would be the features that would make me consider switching back over.
lumix is now game changer
Can’t wait for whatever they release next!!
@@adamtalkstech anyupdate bro about new camera
i think panasonic is superior than sony except lacks of gyro metadata and weird corner wobbling things going on with wider angle lenses
Yeah I haven't noticed the corner wobble yet but I could see it in other sample footage.
Awesome
I like more Lumix but the len selection is not bueno maybe in like 5 years
What lenses would you want? It’s not as good as Sony but I’ve tried 6 of the Panasonic lenses and been able to find exactly what I needed minus the fact most of the primes are 1.8 instead of 1.4.
I do wish they had a 20-70 f4 like Sony does though :)
@@adamtalkstech 20-60 3.5-5.6 tho~
hope there maybe a f 2.8-4 version in the future
nice❤❤
Thank you! Cheers!
It’s 3x2.
True.
you make me want to sell A7iv
always stop and check what meets your production needs before making a big change. I really needed the open gate shooting for how I’m capturing content now.
i shoot sony and freaking love it but daaaaaaaaaaang that s5iix is sexy as fuck
It’s sleek for sure!
your title needs adjusting
True dat
Thank you for the comment, I changed it earlier and didn’t double check 🤫