RIght now the Stratos is $299. The Dyson does have some pros, like the removable brushroll, but I am willing to take the risk with the Shark for $100 less. Either way, I probably wont ever lose sleep over this.
Shark Stratos is fantastic! I have had mine for over a month! I previously had the original shark for over 10 years with very impressive suction power. The real test with my new Shark stratos was this evening I used my carpet deep steam cleaner and typically it ALWAYS brings up a ton of embedded everything.....today it just brought up dirty water....nothing else... Officially impressed with my new shark stratos no doubt 👌 Highly highly recommend!
No kidding!! I got a Shark Stratos this year, and is just much powerful than the Dyson I got last year!! And the Stratos cleaned way deeper, just like you said, plus you don't have to worry about the hair, incredible technology 😉
I certainly will! In past videos I used a set of the same debris every time but I since have moved and have found it harder to film. But I will repeat this video once I can get those materials and floors back
I think it would be useful to show the filters after this test. I’ve found that dyson pre motor filters stay much cleaner after vacuuming fine particles like this compared to shark. I think dyson has the lead in cyclone tech and shark has the lead in cleaner head tech
I certainly agree with you on the cyclone and cleaner head statement you made. I did get another comment asking to see the filters. I originally did plan on showing the filters but inevitably I forgot. But I do remember that the filters were actually very clean on both of these machines. The cyclone technology shark has out into their newer top of the line models is really astounding. I’m very shocked at what they can do with only 1 cyclone. The Dysons is better, but the truth is. I don’t use the dyson. In everyday life, I use shark
The technology may be more sophisticated, but that doesnt always equate to better. Premium vacuum cleaner brands like Kirby, Miele and Riccar dont use the sophisticated dual cyclone systems either. Also, the more in depth reviews I have seen all conclude that all closed HEPA filter systes are >99% efficient at filtratikon.
@@typedeaf the air may be just as clean from both of them after the post motor filter, but the Dyson is more effective at separating the dirt before the pre motor filter so you have to clean it less frequently
I did look at the filters of both of these machines and they both looked the exact same as they did when starting. Although it wasn’t shown on camera. I have to say the newer sharks have a much more efficient cyclone system. No it’s not as good as Dysons. But it’s certainly good enough for regained household use
Other channels have done that and both rated at 100%, meaning placing N grams of debris on the carpet resulted in N grams increase in canister. Some vac did >100% meaning they got extra stuff. THat begs the question of, was it N grams of the debris or was some of that carpet fiber, dust from before, etc. How scientificly accurate do you need it to be for a vacuum cleaner?
I’d go with the Dyson unless you were looking for specific features the shark had like anti hair wrap, powered lift away, and duoclean. But the Dyson will most likely clean a little bit better and both have excellent filtration. And Dyson is generally built a little bit better. But both are great options. But seen as the Dyson is also cheaper, that would be my choice.
@@vinodhsubramanian1954 it will certainly pick it up however it will mostly likely get wrapped around the brushroll requiring revalue maintenance. Just keep an eye on it
Ok. Everyone saying to leave Dyson brushroll on hard floor. People do not leave hard brushrolls in when cleaning hardwood or any other residential floor. It would damage them.
Yes this is correct. I used the vacuums as the manufacturer recommended. Dyson says brushroll off. Shark says brushroll slowed. I prefer brushroll slowed so there is still a sweeping action without the damage
We were using the shark vacuum cleaner since the year 2017 and yesterday I broke its pipe by twisting it because I wanted to clean inside the pipe which is not possible it was working great as new, I wish I never experimented with it. Today I will Buy my shark vacuum cleaner again! Hopefully, it will have the same life as the previous one.
I’m so sorry yours broke! If you want you can buy that piece separately and save some money or you can buy a whole new vacuum and start over. I probably would get a new vacuum because I just like new things lol. But if you take care of these vacuums, they will take care of you! They aren’t the longest lasting vacuums but average life is about 7 years.
I used both vacuums according to what the manufacturer recommends. The shark would have won anyway on hard floor because it has a soft roller while the dyson does not.
@@Blackout720 Why only the Shark? Sounds like some kind of implication. You can always do your own video review the way you want it done if it bothers you that much.
I’m debating which to get, stratos or vertex. Is the stratos louder? Heavier? Is its hose shorter then that of the virtex? Is the stratos better then the vertex?
They’re basically the same. The stratos by the numbers is heavier but I noticed zero difference. They’re so similar I would get whichever one is cheaper at the moment. If they’re the same, pick your favorite color 🤷♀️
@@Black____ it’s actually a fairly quiet vacuum. The vertex is slightly quieter in my opinion but you won’t notice too much of a difference in real life
@@medeirosm90 I’m personally not a fan. They work well in Europe where their vacuums are less powerful. But this head on a powerful vacuum makes the vacuum really hard to push and not very easy to handle. It cleans decent. The old head was better in almost every way to me. But I didn’t like the blind spot or the hair tangle.
You can fight with them. I have in the past. Sometimes on their more experience machines they will cover it. Their cheaper machines usually they won’t. But the motor will always be covered under 5 years. But generally their Warranty isn’t as strong as Dysons
Yes. The only difference would be color and tools. And at the time that I bought this machine, the complete was actually not even out yet. If it was I probably would have gotten it. But the machine is the exact same
Vacuuming flour was not the best choice. You should test with hard to pick up debris, like best hair, fireplace debris, etc. I, for one, need something for pet hair.
Both of these vacuums are great at pet hair. Truthfully, I can’t think of a modern upright vacuum that isn’t good with pet hair. If the filters are washed and belt in good condition, it’s going to work just fine. I have other pickup tests with many different vacuums and they mainly differ with the heavier stuff like rocks and sand. Pet hair is generally always picked up no problem.
I heard from intelitech studios that the shark stratos is outcleaned by the dyson ball animal 3 because of the soft bristles. Honestly that’s a disappointment.
Please remember to keep in mind what channels are biased towards brands. I am an unbiased channel that just sees a vacuum for the way it is. Intellitech studios is a shark hater and believes Dirt devil is better. Whike everyone can have an opinion, it shouldn’t be implemented into a case of helping others decide what’s better. It needs to be factual. The dyson ball animal 3 does generally clean carpet better than the shark. But the shark can certainly do a lot more than the dyson at a better price. So it all depends on what someone will want. Generally speaking though, the shark is better.
@@DillonCleans interesting and great perspective on this. I haven’t been involved in the vacuum reviews for a while so I wasn’t really sure. Thanks for the info.
@@DillonCleans i still think shark can improve the design by adding a removable rear brushroll and adding slightly stiffer bristles that meet in a chevron pattern to help carpet cleaning ability be much more improved. It’s already a decent design but lacks those important features.
@@charlesrodriguez7984 I think that could improve performance for sure. But the softer bristles do help with hard floors and still works well on carpet so I think it creates a good balance. But a removable brushroll would be great and removable bristles would be even better
On the concrete test, you turned off the brush roll on the Dyson. Then you tested the Shark with the brush on. Then complimented the shark like it was superior. Uuuhhh... Bro, you had the BRUSH ON. I'd love to see a short video doing it again with Dyson brush on. Then check the difference. Not fair AT ALL!
Both vacuums were set to their hard floor settings like I stated in the video. They were used how you were intended to use them on hard floors. You cannot turn on the brush roll in the shark, the hard floor setting only slows it down. Dyson does not recommend using the brush roll on hard floors. Test was as fair as it could be. And the shark worked better.
I’m unsure if you have read Dysons recommendations so I can help you out here. Dyson recommends turning off the brushroll since it wasn’t not designed to be run on hard floors. You cannot turn off the brushroll on the shark. It has a hard floor life that slows down the brushroll so avoid scratching hard floors and to prevent scattering debris. As I’ve seen you’ve left another comment on my channel also mentioning why the dyson brushroll was off, I can conclude that you would’ve preferred if the dyson had won. But I use all my machines the way they were intended which is what makes my tests repeatable and reliable
Question for you guys! My pets tend to pee everywhere, carpet, floors, couch and wall corners etc. Which vacuum's brushroll would be easier to clean and maintain?
The Dysons is certainly easier to maintain because it comes out completely. The sharks main brushroll does not however the soft roller does. So between the two machines, I would say the dyson would be easier. I’ve actually ran over a pee spot with mine lol
Because Dyson says not to and the shark has the duoclean meant for hard floors. I used each machine as intended by the companies and the shark did better
I also use both same ones. I like them both however Kinda more towards the Shark. I can get under beds ect. It seem like I pick up more stuff the bin in the Shark seem to have more stuff floating around in it. The Dyson feel like it sucks the carpet way harder. It pick up but I do not see all that white looking stuff in the bin of the Dyson. I dont lknow if it how Dyson filters the stuff so you dont get I call it cotton candy effect way it looks in the Shark. So I use the Dyson for a few weeks then I flip back to my Shark, The Shark i feel like them fins are not going to last long. I can already see over past 8 months they seem to be looking like they are getting smaller. And you can not replace the brushroll. So Dyson for the win on that one seeing how you can. But the Shark feel way more solid built the Dyson feel very cheap made to me. Cant push the dam thing threw the house with out it coming back down again. And the handle feel way to cheap. Shark just feel like a tank comparted to the Dyson.
@@donb1979 Wow. Thanks. Noise wise, is the Shark very loud? Seems to be from some of the videos I’ve seen. I ordered the Shark yesterday for a price of $89 with a special discount code, so I’m hoping I like the Shark
Lol you both belong together always leaving unnecessary comments Dillon did this fair and square and yes Matthew is right sense the shark is way cheaper and beats the dyson in almost everything except for ……… nothing
The shark is only 299 right now and no madder what you say it’s the better deal I’m not even a huge shark fan but the shark is better looking at the facts and the specks that it has over the dyson you don’t have to replace the odor cartridge or the filters every 6 months not sure we’re you got that bs from but the shark Is the better deal the dyson is still a good vacuum just not in value
I have a shark nv22 that is over 10 years old and has not one issue besides the lower hose which was very cheap under 6$ and I got a set of filters from shark cause they were missing when I got it as a trash find . Motor runs fine the brush roll motor works fine . My vertex shows almost no sings of wear and tare . I have two shark navigator swivels one 6 years old other is 3 year old neither have any issues a newer rotator about 1 year old no issues at all my dyson dc25 needed everything when I got it and it was all expensive
I see there is a little bit of a fued going on here so I will settle this fair and square. The shark won this competition and overall the shark wins in general. It cleans carpets very well and shines on hardfloor and versatility is unmatched. The Dysons main string point is carpet cleaning. Not much else. And yes the shark is $299. I purchased mine for $299 from sharks website and the price is still current as of this comment. Sharks do hold up overtime if you take care of them just like any vacuum. I have a 10 year old shark and many other sharks that are years old that still work great. I can say the exact same for Dyson. I have Dysons over 10 years old that work great. However I do have to say that sharks hold up a little bit better when it comes to brushrolls and hoses and wearable parts. But then again Dyson replaces wearable parts unlike shark. So ultimately it depends on the situation. Dyson freak I understand that you’re a Dyson lover but for you to say my test was unfair isn’t very appreciated as I work hard on my videos and have proven time and time again that the vertex/ stratos is a better vacuum in most cases. However the Dyson is certainly a very respectable machine and works well. Both are great. One is better for most homes and applications. Please do not reply back to this comment unless there is something I strongly said incorrectly. Have a wonderful day everyone.
I personally believe it’s the other way around. But I still prefer shark over dyson in everyday use. They are just more functional and useful for nearly all circumstances when Dysons are more task specific oriented
You made the first pass much faster with the Ball 3 than the Shark. For deep cleaning carpets and on hard floors, you're supposed to close the gates on the brush head too. It makes a significant difference when it comes to suction. As someone who has owned Sharks and Dysons, even though the Shark has good suction, its ability to separate fine particles and dust from clean air is absolutely awful compared to any Dyson. As a result, you get less microparticles blown back into the air, more ultrafine particles in the bin, and the HEPA filter stays clean much, much longer. Shark is a good lower cost brand, but when it comes to engineering, functionality, and longevity Dyson wins by a mile.
In this test I preferred the shark. And in everyday use I use the shark because of its functionality. I also left the gates open since that’s what it will be most of the time across all floor surfaces. They are both great machines. They both filter well. They both clean well. I think the shark was better thought it in design. And the dyson for me is just too hard to push. Other people have had the Same complaint. The animal 2 didn’t have that problem
@@nroiniotis88 You’re citing the “recent tests” from Vacuum Wars’ UA-cam. The only thing that test means is that the plastic warped from heat. I’ve had the same experience with my bagless Shark and bagless Kenmore. The only time I haven’t experienced particle leaks is with a BAGGED vacuum that uses a cloth HEPA bag.
I love how you showed the difference between the shark and dyson.
Awesome I did the right purchase going from the animal 2 to the Stratos thank you for the comparison
Confirmation bias at its best!
Good comparison! I think it would’ve been a draw if the Dyson had its brushroll on.
It possibly could!
Woohooohoo! I been so excited about this new Shark! They both are awesome I think. Hi Dillon 👋😁
Ooo new vacuum video!
RIght now the Stratos is $299. The Dyson does have some pros, like the removable brushroll, but I am willing to take the risk with the Shark for $100 less. Either way, I probably wont ever lose sleep over this.
In my opinion, the shark is better in nearly every single way
Shark Stratos is fantastic! I have had mine for over a month! I previously had the original shark for over 10 years with very impressive suction power. The real test with my new Shark stratos was this evening I used my carpet deep steam cleaner and typically it ALWAYS brings up a ton of embedded everything.....today it just brought up dirty water....nothing else...
Officially impressed with my new shark stratos no doubt 👌
Highly highly recommend!
No kidding!! I got a Shark Stratos this year, and is just much powerful than the Dyson I got last year!!
And the Stratos cleaned way deeper, just like you said, plus you don't have to worry about the hair, incredible technology 😉
One year later, are you still loving it?
I'd like to know too! We need an update.
Shark definitely does much better than the Dyson, I have both
Interesting to hear because some rating sites say different.. appreciate real world feedback
For future test also test on other types of debris. Thanks for this test, helpful...
I certainly will! In past videos I used a set of the same debris every time but I since have moved and have found it harder to film. But I will repeat this video once I can get those materials and floors back
@@DillonCleans Pet hair for one
I think it would be useful to show the filters after this test. I’ve found that dyson pre motor filters stay much cleaner after vacuuming fine particles like this compared to shark. I think dyson has the lead in cyclone tech and shark has the lead in cleaner head tech
I certainly agree with you on the cyclone and cleaner head statement you made. I did get another comment asking to see the filters. I originally did plan on showing the filters but inevitably I forgot. But I do remember that the filters were actually very clean on both of these machines. The cyclone technology shark has out into their newer top of the line models is really astounding. I’m very shocked at what they can do with only 1 cyclone. The Dysons is better, but the truth is. I don’t use the dyson. In everyday life, I use shark
The technology may be more sophisticated, but that doesnt always equate to better. Premium vacuum cleaner brands like Kirby, Miele and Riccar dont use the sophisticated dual cyclone systems either. Also, the more in depth reviews I have seen all conclude that all closed HEPA filter systes are >99% efficient at filtratikon.
@@typedeaf the air may be just as clean from both of them after the post motor filter, but the Dyson is more effective at separating the dirt before the pre motor filter so you have to clean it less frequently
Agreed I hate the head of dysons tbh which is why I opt for a shark as even though it’s technically not as strong it seems to function better
@@DillonCleans Interesting comment. What made you choose the Shark for everyday? Versatility on different floors?
You should weigh the pre-motor filters before and after just to see how much more fine dirt the Dyson’s many cyclones capture in contrast to Shark’s 1
I did look at the filters of both of these machines and they both looked the exact same as they did when starting. Although it wasn’t shown on camera. I have to say the newer sharks have a much more efficient cyclone system. No it’s not as good as Dysons. But it’s certainly good enough for regained household use
Other channels have done that and both rated at 100%, meaning placing N grams of debris on the carpet resulted in N grams increase in canister. Some vac did >100% meaning they got extra stuff. THat begs the question of, was it N grams of the debris or was some of that carpet fiber, dust from before, etc. How scientificly accurate do you need it to be for a vacuum cleaner?
@Dillon cleans, my apartment is 1400 square ft with 90% carpet. Should I go for Dyson ball multifloor origin for $199 or Shark stratos for $299?
I’d go with the Dyson unless you were looking for specific features the shark had like anti hair wrap, powered lift away, and duoclean. But the Dyson will most likely clean a little bit better and both have excellent filtration. And Dyson is generally built a little bit better. But both are great options. But seen as the Dyson is also cheaper, that would be my choice.
@@DillonCleans Thanks Dillon. Does Dyson multifloor origin works well for long hair?
@@vinodhsubramanian1954 it will certainly pick it up however it will mostly likely get wrapped around the brushroll requiring revalue maintenance. Just keep an eye on it
@@DillonCleans Thanks Dillon.
Ok. Everyone saying to leave Dyson brushroll on hard floor. People do not leave hard brushrolls in when cleaning hardwood or any other residential floor. It would damage them.
Yes this is correct. I used the vacuums as the manufacturer recommended. Dyson says brushroll off. Shark says brushroll slowed. I prefer brushroll slowed so there is still a sweeping action without the damage
We were using the shark vacuum cleaner since the year 2017 and yesterday I broke its pipe by twisting it because I wanted to clean inside the pipe which is not possible it was working great as new, I wish I never experimented with it. Today I will Buy my shark vacuum cleaner again! Hopefully, it will have the same life as the previous one.
I’m so sorry yours broke! If you want you can buy that piece separately and save some money or you can buy a whole new vacuum and start over. I probably would get a new vacuum because I just like new things lol. But if you take care of these vacuums, they will take care of you! They aren’t the longest lasting vacuums but average life is about 7 years.
The shark had the brushes moving so its obviously going to create a better clean on the hard surface
I used both vacuums according to what the manufacturer recommends. The shark would have won anyway on hard floor because it has a soft roller while the dyson does not.
You have to remember, Shark Vacuums don't have parts available, so you throw them out as E-Waste.
Bullshit
Is it worth the upgrade from the vertex? Do you find it better to handle then vertex?
It’s the same vacuum. Some cosmetic changes but it’s basically the exact same. So far they handle very similar as well
Aww I’ve missed hearing you talk to us!!😍😍😩😩 I didn’t even know there was a new shark, excited!!
I hope to get back to posting more!! And yes a new shark comes out every 2 years
I'd love to see Shark's filter after this test :D
After the video ended that was the first thing I checked. Perfectly clean
@@DillonCleans right
@@Blackout720 Why only the Shark? Sounds like some kind of implication. You can always do your own video review the way you want it done if it bothers you that much.
I’m debating which to get, stratos or vertex. Is the stratos louder? Heavier? Is its hose shorter then that of the virtex? Is the stratos better then the vertex?
They’re basically the same. The stratos by the numbers is heavier but I noticed zero difference. They’re so similar I would get whichever one is cheaper at the moment. If they’re the same, pick your favorite color 🤷♀️
@@DillonCleans
Is the stratos very loud? It sounds loud on video
@@Black____ it’s actually a fairly quiet vacuum. The vertex is slightly quieter in my opinion but you won’t notice too much of a difference in real life
Why did you shut off the brush roll on the Dyson but then use the shark with it two rollers on when doing the hard floor
Because that’s what the manufacturer recommends.
@@DillonCleans I like that they have these new heads on the dyson
@@medeirosm90 I’m personally not a fan. They work well in Europe where their vacuums are less powerful. But this head on a powerful vacuum makes the vacuum really hard to push and not very easy to handle. It cleans decent. The old head was better in almost every way to me. But I didn’t like the blind spot or the hair tangle.
Anyone deal wit he sharks warranty department? Everything I read says they won’t cover their products.
You can fight with them. I have in the past. Sometimes on their more experience machines they will cover it. Their cheaper machines usually they won’t. But the motor will always be covered under 5 years. But generally their Warranty isn’t as strong as Dysons
Shark it's like performance sports car .Dyson is like old diesel slow and less power just expensive.
Why didnt you put the dyson on hard floor mode you left it on rug
I did put it in hard floor mode. The brushroll was turned off on hard floors and on while vacuuming carpets
The complete is the flagship for the dyson lol
Yes. The only difference would be color and tools. And at the time that I bought this machine, the complete was actually not even out yet. If it was I probably would have gotten it. But the machine is the exact same
Vacuuming flour was not the best choice. You should test with hard to pick up debris, like best hair, fireplace debris, etc. I, for one, need something for pet hair.
Both of these vacuums are great at pet hair. Truthfully, I can’t think of a modern upright vacuum that isn’t good with pet hair. If the filters are washed and belt in good condition, it’s going to work just fine. I have other pickup tests with many different vacuums and they mainly differ with the heavier stuff like rocks and sand. Pet hair is generally always picked up no problem.
The Shark Stratos seems very high pitched especially compared to the Dyson and the Shark vertex.
It’s not really very high pitched. Just a little louder than the vertex
I heard from intelitech studios that the shark stratos is outcleaned by the dyson ball animal 3 because of the soft bristles. Honestly that’s a disappointment.
Please remember to keep in mind what channels are biased towards brands. I am an unbiased channel that just sees a vacuum for the way it is. Intellitech studios is a shark hater and believes Dirt devil is better. Whike everyone can have an opinion, it shouldn’t be implemented into a case of helping others decide what’s better. It needs to be factual. The dyson ball animal 3 does generally clean carpet better than the shark. But the shark can certainly do a lot more than the dyson at a better price. So it all depends on what someone will want. Generally speaking though, the shark is better.
@@DillonCleans interesting and great perspective on this. I haven’t been involved in the vacuum reviews for a while so I wasn’t really sure. Thanks for the info.
@@DillonCleans i still think shark can improve the design by adding a removable rear brushroll and adding slightly stiffer bristles that meet in a chevron pattern to help carpet cleaning ability be much more improved. It’s already a decent design but lacks those important features.
@@charlesrodriguez7984 I think that could improve performance for sure. But the softer bristles do help with hard floors and still works well on carpet so I think it creates a good balance. But a removable brushroll would be great and removable bristles would be even better
@@DillonCleans I 100% agree.
you didnt notice that dyson on floor doesn't rotate the head!
Yes I did know this. I used both machines per how the manufacturer would want you to use them
On the concrete test, you turned off the brush roll on the Dyson. Then you tested the Shark with the brush on. Then complimented the shark like it was superior. Uuuhhh... Bro, you had the BRUSH ON. I'd love to see a short video doing it again with Dyson brush on. Then check the difference. Not fair AT ALL!
Both vacuums were set to their hard floor settings like I stated in the video. They were used how you were intended to use them on hard floors. You cannot turn on the brush roll in the shark, the hard floor setting only slows it down. Dyson does not recommend using the brush roll on hard floors. Test was as fair as it could be. And the shark worked better.
I see no reason to turn OFF the brushroll on the dyson, when leaving it ON on the Shark. Either its ON on both or OFF on both.
I’m unsure if you have read Dysons recommendations so I can help you out here. Dyson recommends turning off the brushroll since it wasn’t not designed to be run on hard floors. You cannot turn off the brushroll on the shark. It has a hard floor life that slows down the brushroll so avoid scratching hard floors and to prevent scattering debris. As I’ve seen you’ve left another comment on my channel also mentioning why the dyson brushroll was off, I can conclude that you would’ve preferred if the dyson had won. But I use all my machines the way they were intended which is what makes my tests repeatable and reliable
Question for you guys! My pets tend to pee everywhere, carpet, floors, couch and wall corners etc. Which vacuum's brushroll would be easier to clean and maintain?
The Dysons is certainly easier to maintain because it comes out completely. The sharks main brushroll does not however the soft roller does. So between the two machines, I would say the dyson would be easier. I’ve actually ran over a pee spot with mine lol
Disgusting. Throw them pets outside to live
Yeah bro, that’s pretty nasty. Time to potty train your animals.
Dude you slammed the Dyson on the ground and did not do that on the shark
Is that an issue 👩🦯
@@DillonCleans well ya that might be the reason materials fell out of the Dyson and not the shark.
@@nickibateson1466 from experience some stuff falls out of Dysons but rarely falls out of duoclean sharks
Dyson Dc01 ?
….what 👶🍽
@@DillonCleans lmao, I’ve been the one asking about the follow up video on the dyson dc01
@@anonymous_who6419 oh yes I will have that uploaded just been busy
@@DillonCleans, I understand completely lol and take your time lol I like watching your content anyways so I’m fine with when ever
Like why you wouldn’t use the brush roll on the Dyson when the shark runs the brush roll 🤷🏻♂️
Because Dyson says not to and the shark has the duoclean meant for hard floors. I used each machine as intended by the companies and the shark did better
I also use both same ones. I like them both however Kinda more towards the Shark. I can get under beds ect. It seem like I pick up more stuff the bin in the Shark seem to have more stuff floating around in it. The Dyson feel like it sucks the carpet way harder. It pick up but I do not see all that white looking stuff in the bin of the Dyson. I dont lknow if it how Dyson filters the stuff so you dont get I call it cotton candy effect way it looks in the Shark. So I use the Dyson for a few weeks then I flip back to my Shark, The Shark i feel like them fins are not going to last long. I can already see over past 8 months they seem to be looking like they are getting smaller. And you can not replace the brushroll. So Dyson for the win on that one seeing how you can. But the Shark feel way more solid built the Dyson feel very cheap made to me. Cant push the dam thing threw the house with out it coming back down again. And the handle feel way to cheap. Shark just feel like a tank comparted to the Dyson.
The brush roll isn’t replaceable?
@@Black____ on the dyson 3 it is
@@donb1979
Wow. Thanks.
Noise wise, is the Shark very loud? Seems to be from some of the videos I’ve seen. I ordered the Shark yesterday for a price of $89 with a special discount code, so I’m hoping I like the Shark
Sharks stick Hoover's blow any Dyson out of the water
I hate the Dyson’s design, it could be better than shark but I’d never buy it .
I don’t live the Dysons design but it certainly works. I use the shark all the time. But the dyson just sits around
I Think The Shark Put The Dyson To Shame!
Lol you both belong together always leaving unnecessary comments Dillon did this fair and square and yes Matthew is right sense the shark is way cheaper and beats the dyson in almost everything except for ……… nothing
The shark is only 299 right now and no madder what you say it’s the better deal I’m not even a huge shark fan but the shark is better looking at the facts and the specks that it has over the dyson you don’t have to replace the odor cartridge or the filters every 6 months not sure we’re you got that bs from but the shark Is the better deal the dyson is still a good vacuum just not in value
I have a shark nv22 that is over 10 years old and has not one issue besides the lower hose which was very cheap under 6$ and I got a set of filters from shark cause they were missing when I got it as a trash find . Motor runs fine the brush roll motor works fine . My vertex shows almost no sings of wear and tare . I have two shark navigator swivels one 6 years old other is 3 year old neither have any issues a newer rotator about 1 year old no issues at all my dyson dc25 needed everything when I got it and it was all expensive
I see there is a little bit of a fued going on here so I will settle this fair and square. The shark won this competition and overall the shark wins in general. It cleans carpets very well and shines on hardfloor and versatility is unmatched. The Dysons main string point is carpet cleaning. Not much else. And yes the shark is $299. I purchased mine for $299 from sharks website and the price is still current as of this comment. Sharks do hold up overtime if you take care of them just like any vacuum. I have a 10 year old shark and many other sharks that are years old that still work great. I can say the exact same for Dyson. I have Dysons over 10 years old that work great. However I do have to say that sharks hold up a little bit better when it comes to brushrolls and hoses and wearable parts. But then again Dyson replaces wearable parts unlike shark. So ultimately it depends on the situation. Dyson freak I understand that you’re a Dyson lover but for you to say my test was unfair isn’t very appreciated as I work hard on my videos and have proven time and time again that the vertex/ stratos is a better vacuum in most cases. However the Dyson is certainly a very respectable machine and works well. Both are great. One is better for most homes and applications. Please do not reply back to this comment unless there is something I strongly said incorrectly. Have a wonderful day everyone.
@@DillonCleanswell said
🄿🅁🄾🄼🄾🅂🄼 💕
Less talking, just get to the point. This video didn’t need to last 8 minutes.
Actually it did so I can get paid ☺️
Shark 🦈 is better, Dyson just spends more money on advertising.
But Shark spends more in it's technology.
Sorry to disappoint any fan boys or girls!!
I personally believe it’s the other way around. But I still prefer shark over dyson in everyday use. They are just more functional and useful for nearly all circumstances when Dysons are more task specific oriented
You made the first pass much faster with the Ball 3 than the Shark. For deep cleaning carpets and on hard floors, you're supposed to close the gates on the brush head too. It makes a significant difference when it comes to suction. As someone who has owned Sharks and Dysons, even though the Shark has good suction, its ability to separate fine particles and dust from clean air is absolutely awful compared to any Dyson. As a result, you get less microparticles blown back into the air, more ultrafine particles in the bin, and the HEPA filter stays clean much, much longer. Shark is a good lower cost brand, but when it comes to engineering, functionality, and longevity Dyson wins by a mile.
Actually in recent tests Dyson has problems with releasing fine particles back into the air.
@@nroiniotis88 Going to need a source on that claim
In this test I preferred the shark. And in everyday use I use the shark because of its functionality. I also left the gates open since that’s what it will be most of the time across all floor surfaces. They are both great machines. They both filter well. They both clean well. I think the shark was better thought it in design. And the dyson for me is just too hard to push. Other people have had the Same complaint. The animal 2 didn’t have that problem
@@nroiniotis88
You’re citing the “recent tests” from Vacuum Wars’ UA-cam. The only thing that test means is that the plastic warped from heat.
I’ve had the same experience with my bagless Shark and bagless Kenmore.
The only time I haven’t experienced particle leaks is with a BAGGED vacuum that uses a cloth HEPA bag.
Either way, the shark has dual rollers which makes it phenomenally better at picking up things in the deep fibers of the carpet.