Seiko Turtle Review and Comparison (Srp777)(6309-7049)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
  • This is a review of one of the most comfortable watches in my collection the Seiko Turtle and a comparison between both new and old models. 🐢

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @vonbon954
    @vonbon954 Рік тому +7

    I remember wearing my 6309-7040 (Turtle) in the 1980s during the height of the Quartz Crisis/Craze, thinking that this is just the best watch design ever. Perfect legibility, perfect comfort, perfect complications, perfect toughness, and perfect durability.
    (Pause to check wrist)
    Yep, it still is.

  • @user-gl5ld9vm7i
    @user-gl5ld9vm7i Рік тому +5

    Aside from fountain pens, I also love mechanical watches. I love the Seiko watches. These Turtles are very nice.

  • @doomthespacemarine4998
    @doomthespacemarine4998 Рік тому +4

    Turtles are my favorite watches ever.

  • @davebudd1429
    @davebudd1429 Рік тому +4

    Great comparison, thanks for the review!

  • @asdfyxcv1100
    @asdfyxcv1100 Рік тому +3

    to everyone viewing: note that they both aren't the SRPE93K1 (which I was looking for), which has a small lumed index at the three o'clock position, right next to the date field

  • @lefterismic3978
    @lefterismic3978 Рік тому +2

    Fantastic watch, best diver ever imo!

  • @DavidClarke-kj5ky
    @DavidClarke-kj5ky 8 місяців тому

    both of these are great.
    the black dial black bezel new models are excellent all rounders, but the vintage models do have something a little special that puts them ahead. i currently have 4 6309s and 3 6306s
    🤓

  • @markcreighton3733
    @markcreighton3733 8 місяців тому +1

    Crown position of the srp777 is slightly different to the 6309 as it falls at approx 18 minute mark not the 20 past mark.

    • @bruh_oly1370
      @bruh_oly1370 7 місяців тому

      Yes -Plus the chapter ring is less prominent or steeped on the 6309 /6306.

  • @simonredman4805
    @simonredman4805 6 місяців тому

    The 777 is a rare example of a retro watch done right. However, to me, the extra mm in both thickness and length make it wear completely differently - the 6309 just sneaks in on the acceptable side of large and flat. The 77* family also appears to have a cast, shiny bezel with a very light spring versus a milled bezel with a satisfying click ball on the 6309.
    The 77* family also suffers from modern Seiko's QC problems. Q: How do you spot a fake Seiko? A: The bezel, dial and rehaut all line up.
    But. Good luck buying a decent, unmolested 6309. Minefield!