Paddle Steamer Waverley Departing Glasgow, 13th August 2018.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 38

  • @briancaldwell283
    @briancaldwell283 4 роки тому +14

    As a kid I sailed on the Waverley at least once a year. I adored her massive engines. I was on board from late 1940s until mid 60s.

  • @fontybits
    @fontybits 2 роки тому +2

    I had my stag night on the Waverley, back in 1979. I won a raffle on board that night - a 14 inch B&W TV.

  • @BritBattler
    @BritBattler 3 роки тому +8

    The waverley is most certainly a symbol of Glaswegian shipbuilding up there with the RMS Queen Mary and the lusitania.

  • @glebz7294
    @glebz7294 3 роки тому +3

    What a beautiful architecture she has! Love her

  • @willjeffery2661
    @willjeffery2661 2 роки тому +4

    The star there was the mighty little tug boat. I would like to know more about her.

  • @glyntutt1586
    @glyntutt1586 5 років тому +15

    The original bow thruster!

  • @acersalman8258
    @acersalman8258 Рік тому +1

    beautiful ❤ships

  • @stephenwilson5043
    @stephenwilson5043 Рік тому +1

    All that noise makes you realise how quiet Waverley herself is :)

  • @TheDarrenguyuk
    @TheDarrenguyuk 2 роки тому +1

    been on this loasds time wicked day out

  • @jimtomassetti8928
    @jimtomassetti8928 Рік тому

    Fantastic vidio of a great ship. Can you do a vidio of the in side place?😊

  • @calziewalzie
    @calziewalzie 2 роки тому +1

    Great video!

  • @drownplayz
    @drownplayz 3 роки тому +2

    nice

  • @WINCHANDLE
    @WINCHANDLE 5 років тому +4

    amazing they still built a paddle wheeler in 1946. I guess post war, it was the easiest thing to build with materials in short supply. Any insights?

    • @kpadmirer
      @kpadmirer 4 роки тому +1

      Screw propulsion is more efficient, but paddles are more maneuverable.

    • @glasgowbrian1469
      @glasgowbrian1469 4 роки тому +7

      @@kpadmirer Not in the case of the Waverley - the paddles use the same crankshaft and can’t be operated independently.

    • @geofrancis2001
      @geofrancis2001 3 роки тому +4

      its built to work in shallow harbours, draft is only 6ft.

    • @BritBattler
      @BritBattler 3 роки тому +1

      It is a replica of a ship built in 1896 and sunk at Dunkirk. The mordern waverley attempts to keep the prestige of the original vessel.

    • @dartskipper3170
      @dartskipper3170 2 роки тому +1

      Post War the Government provided a scheme for shipowners to replace tonnage lost in the War. They were only allowed to replace like for like as closely as possible so if the owners lost a paddle steamer it was replaced by a paddle steamer. The General Steam Navigation Company lost two diesel powered ships which were replaced by similar size and power vessels.

  • @peter9180
    @peter9180 4 роки тому

    Was it the Waverley who would transit the Menai Straits in the sixties, Holyhead to Menai Bridge during the summer season?

    • @PSPSScottishBranch
      @PSPSScottishBranch  3 роки тому +1

      No, not the Waverley. She has never ( and never likely to ) transit the Menai Straights.

  • @Jonathan07ta
    @Jonathan07ta 3 роки тому +1

    Can i ask why there is no steam coming from the funnels

    • @PSPSScottishBranch
      @PSPSScottishBranch  3 роки тому +3

      The steam is directed to the engine. Only exhaust gases from the boilers come out the funnels.

    • @mfbfreak
      @mfbfreak 2 роки тому

      ​@@PSPSScottishBranch Is this the case for most ships? I know that for locomotives, the steam is exhausted through the smoke stack via a venturi-like system to create more draft for the fire. It would make sense to me to do the same on a ship.

    • @Crosshair84
      @Crosshair84 Рік тому +1

      @@mfbfreak That is done on locomotives because you can stop and refill the water every 100 miles. Where are steamships in the middle of the Baltic Sea supposed to stop and fill up with fresh water every few hours? The steam is condensed and recycled back into the boilers on steamships.

  • @boataxe4605
    @boataxe4605 4 роки тому +1

    Why is there not any smoke coming from the stacks?

    • @liamsellick6664
      @liamsellick6664 4 роки тому +1

      Boat Axe it was converted in 1957 to burn fuel oil

    • @boataxe4605
      @boataxe4605 4 роки тому +2

      Liam Sellick Fuel oil still makes smoke.

    • @liamsellick6664
      @liamsellick6664 4 роки тому +2

      Boat Axe I answered your question buddy it’s burning a different type of fuel to heat it’s boilers now Back in the days it ran on coal plenty of smoke would of been coming out

    • @boataxe4605
      @boataxe4605 4 роки тому +3

      Liam Sellick I was just thinking of the classic ocean liners, they still smoked after being converted from coal to oil.

  • @WINCHANDLE
    @WINCHANDLE 5 років тому +2

    impressive 18 knots

    • @PSPSScottishBranch
      @PSPSScottishBranch  4 роки тому +4

      Waverley achieved just over 18 knots on trials in 1947. This equates to around 21 mph as 1 knot equals 1.15078 mph.

    • @doobz444
      @doobz444 3 роки тому

      Does the waverly have a thrusters?

    • @arane7197
      @arane7197 3 роки тому

      @@doobz444 it’s piston engines

  • @leonardoochoadaniel2645
    @leonardoochoadaniel2645 4 роки тому

    Me lo regalan?

  • @JPOC226
    @JPOC226 3 роки тому +1

    Sherlock Holmes 2

  • @Schlipperschlopper
    @Schlipperschlopper 3 роки тому

    Wonderfull old steamer, one might convert it to a hydrogen steam boiling system (Climate neutral) as they do in Germany with steam locomotives at Meiningen steam train workshop...coal or oil will be unavailable from 2030 on....

    • @nickharden2971
      @nickharden2971 2 роки тому +2

      there'll still be plenty of fuel oil around. cant convert the cargo fleets to renewables in the next 50 years or more.