4.3. Chemical Kinetics

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 71

  • @lonelymoon000
    @lonelymoon000 3 роки тому +25

    Informative at its best. Try to include 0:00 so that the timestamps can be included as chapters inside the video.
    ------
    OUTLINE
    0:00 Introduction
    4:19 Reaction rates
    11:00 Rate law
    13:02 Determining the rate law: isolation method
    20:28 Determining the rate law: integrated rate laws
    31:02 Half-life
    53:23 Collision Theory
    1:01:49 Transition-State Theory
    1:05:43 Effect of temperature on reaction rates: the Arrhenius equation
    1:11:20 Reaction mechanisms
    1:19:02 Pre-equilibrium method
    1:21:26 Steady-state approximation
    1:31:21 Special mechanisms: Lindemann mechanism
    1:39:51 Special mechanisms: Radical chain mechanisms

  • @johnr4906
    @johnr4906 5 років тому +41

    I watched all you videos and got an A in Physical chem one, thank you.

  • @carloconstantino4762
    @carloconstantino4762 Рік тому

    Where have you been all my life. This is one of the best explanations i have seen for chemical kinetics

  • @KostyaGL
    @KostyaGL 3 роки тому +4

    The best explanation of kinetics I've seen, thank you so much

  • @MrsLoolis
    @MrsLoolis 6 років тому +6

    Your lecture was extremely helpful and great made. Thanks :) Greetings from Poland!

  • @arijitdutta5573
    @arijitdutta5573 6 років тому +4

    I was just impressed with the way you have tought..Please upload more videos..Love your videos very much.

  • @DavidEssien-nn7qb
    @DavidEssien-nn7qb Місяць тому

    I love your voice. It's pretty nice and clear.
    I love your video too. Thank you for sharing your knowledge

  • @momodoukasowe3832
    @momodoukasowe3832 4 роки тому

    Thanks for the lecture. Watching all the way from The Gambia.

  • @Gero_Nimo123
    @Gero_Nimo123 3 роки тому

    Thank for your lecture videos. Very helpful in reviewing for licensure examination. I am now a licensed chemist here in the Philippines.

  • @muhindojimmy8552
    @muhindojimmy8552 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks alot madam....Sarah..i really appreciate ur effort towards enlighting my knowledge on chemical kinetics. May God bless you abundantly.....

  • @wendychen4452
    @wendychen4452 2 роки тому +1

    These videos all are very useful and helpful, could you please upload more videos. Thanks!

  • @wy2894
    @wy2894 4 роки тому +1

    This is really helpful! Thank you very much Sarah!

  • @ammarparmr
    @ammarparmr 3 роки тому

    Fantastic lectures
    Well explained
    They are impressive and when I'd knew that there are made 4 years ago with this quality, I did not find a proper word to describe it.
    Thank you so much
    You're an excellent tutor
    You don't just have knowledge, you know how to deliver it as well 👏👏

  • @Faendal91
    @Faendal91 5 років тому +2

    Do you have any videos using the Michaelis Mention theory to confirm enzyme kinetics? Great video btw!

  • @sodaikabiodun2793
    @sodaikabiodun2793 3 роки тому +1

    I cant thank you enough. You just made my life simple

  • @James-Pookulathel
    @James-Pookulathel Рік тому

    You are the boss Ma'am.....Thank you so much.....

  • @AMITKUMAR-nf8in
    @AMITKUMAR-nf8in 7 років тому +1

    wow... it was very good... why have u stopped making videos?

  • @muhindojimmy8552
    @muhindojimmy8552 3 роки тому +1

    How do u generally obtain R² in determining the order of reaction....

  • @ingridgm9488
    @ingridgm9488 2 роки тому

    Thank you very much, your videos are helping me so much!

  • @quaemixfelix6715
    @quaemixfelix6715 5 років тому +11

    kayyy?

    • @wy2894
      @wy2894 4 роки тому

      SOSSSSSSS I AM CRACKED HHHAKLJJJSAKAOPKSAJJSJSJAJJAJJAJAJAAJJAA

  • @MbekezeliKubheka
    @MbekezeliKubheka Рік тому

    hey can you please add videos explaining first order parallel reactions

  • @caesarwiratama3303
    @caesarwiratama3303 3 роки тому

    Very nice and clear explanation. Thanks a lot

  • @mohammedabudaqqa8385
    @mohammedabudaqqa8385 2 роки тому

    WOW! what a great explanation! many thanks to you for these great videos 😍

  • @amilawanasinghe7107
    @amilawanasinghe7107 3 роки тому

    Thanks a lot for the nice and simple explanations! :)

  • @mimic5121
    @mimic5121 3 роки тому

    Thank you... you're a life saver.

  • @cdorman11
    @cdorman11 2 роки тому +1

    'Kay?

  • @konstantinosdivanis4213
    @konstantinosdivanis4213 3 роки тому

    Excellent lesson!Thank you very much

  • @kipmaru4290
    @kipmaru4290 2 роки тому

    Please a lecture on rheology

  • @PankajKumar-xh6oq
    @PankajKumar-xh6oq 5 років тому

    Really that's awesome to learn from you ... applaud you 👍

  • @Wallelgn-melese
    @Wallelgn-melese 2 роки тому

    we need more of your videos, please

  • @pegaseii
    @pegaseii 6 років тому

    Thank you for this! ♥

  • @kishorekumarr6569
    @kishorekumarr6569 7 років тому

    hey sarah , u lectures areeeee tooo nice,

  • @tomon7605
    @tomon7605 5 років тому +1

    Great and friendly lecture for non-native speaker of English. Many thanks.

  • @thewhitelotus7667
    @thewhitelotus7667 5 років тому +1

    Thank you!

  • @PankajKumar-xh6oq
    @PankajKumar-xh6oq 5 років тому

    Mam .. is there any video of you on exothermic and endothermic reaction

  • @thefarellanalysis3496
    @thefarellanalysis3496 4 роки тому +1

    You are one hell of a damsel, beauty and brains, quite hard to find these days 😊

  • @mainestate727
    @mainestate727 5 років тому

    Thank you very much maám! Nice Explainations.

  • @sizweduba328
    @sizweduba328 2 роки тому

    for the second order integrated law isn't suppose to be 1/[A]t=Kt - 1/[A]o

  • @waedsarmigo2123
    @waedsarmigo2123 5 років тому

    Thank you it's very useful
    Put more videos about physical chemistry 2 please

  • @sjjadmortdha5889
    @sjjadmortdha5889 4 роки тому

    هل يمكن تحويل الترجمة للغة العربية رجاءاً

  • @marvellnelson9141
    @marvellnelson9141 6 років тому

    Dont understand where you have y= - 0.0076 where did this number came from? help, please.

    • @mihip619
      @mihip619 5 років тому

      Yeah don't understand it either. When I calculate the slope I get -0.00389. Not sure what I'm doing wrong?

  • @hariwpedits1526
    @hariwpedits1526 3 роки тому

    4 yrs ago ?

  • @htv5485
    @htv5485 3 роки тому

    legendary...

  • @boat7944
    @boat7944 8 років тому +1

    29:15 maybe kdt(not kt)?

    • @SarahMaySibugTorres
      @SarahMaySibugTorres  8 років тому +3

      Oops, my mistake! Yes, it should be dt! I think mentally I got ahead of myself and had the integrated form in mind :)
      Thanks very much for pointing this out :)

  • @reanchern7
    @reanchern7 7 років тому

    Love your lectures. Will there be more coming?

  • @hazratullahhisham
    @hazratullahhisham 8 років тому +6

    please make more videos

  • @stimulantdaimamld2099
    @stimulantdaimamld2099 3 роки тому

    great

  • @md.morshedurrahman5940
    @md.morshedurrahman5940 6 років тому

    Excellent lecture. Thank you

  • @zephaniahgreenwell8151
    @zephaniahgreenwell8151 3 роки тому +1

    "Kay..."

  • @ntombiyomuzinyathi5731
    @ntombiyomuzinyathi5731 8 років тому

    Hey Sarah under steady state approx why did you choose HOCL as the intermediate why not HOI or H2O as the intermediates or why not write all of them and say there are 2 intermediates and 1 catalyst also, when writing the rate expression when not told which one is the slow step are we supposed to write any expression in which the intermediate is involved

    • @SarahMaySibugTorres
      @SarahMaySibugTorres  8 років тому +7

      Hello! Good question! Based on Problem 4.3.4., Step 2 was given as the "slow" or rate determining step, so we wrote down the rate of that step as the overall reaction rate. It just so happens that HOCl is the only intermediate that appears in the reaction rate expression, so we did a steady-state approximation to solve for an expression for HOCl. We could have also written a steady-state approximation expression for the other intermediates, but that for HOCl is the most useful for us in the problem.
      Alternatively for a more general approach... if we don't know which is the slow step, we can write down the rate of the reaction in more general terms, like the concentration change of product with time, either Cl- or OI- (or we can write it in terms of reactant too, but add a negative sign).
      If we use Cl-, we get:
      (eq. 1) Rate = d[Cl-]/dt= k2[I-][HOCl] (same if we knew that step 2 was the slowest step!)
      OR, if we use OI-, we get:
      (eq. 2) Rate= d[OI-]/dt=k3[HOI][OH-] - k-3[OI-] (note that we're assuming H2O is in very large excess, so its concentration is considered to be more or less constant)
      If we use the rate of OI-, we'll have to write the steady state approximation for HOI since it appears in the expression. Interestingly, if we plug an expression for HOI into eq. 2, it just simplifies to eq. 1. So using the change in concentration of either product with time as the overall rate of reaction should yield the same results.
      I hope this helps! :)

  • @pawankumar-ng8du
    @pawankumar-ng8du 6 років тому +1

    @Sarah_May_Sibug..mam u really teach excellently.thank u..🙏😇😘.please upload a video on Electrochemistry of Graduation level..please please please.(please)^infinity..🙏,,thank u in advance ..

  • @tantntn2813
    @tantntn2813 6 років тому +1

    OK

  • @imenviolin5134
    @imenviolin5134 2 роки тому

    Could you please add the Arabic caption to your videos

  • @azca.
    @azca. 2 роки тому +1

    I think we all know what her crutch word is

  • @kamendrasingh5928
    @kamendrasingh5928 4 роки тому

    I am from india

  • @SiddharthSingh-zd7ny
    @SiddharthSingh-zd7ny 4 роки тому +1

    Eh? 😂😂Cute

  • @sindilesira1117
    @sindilesira1117 Рік тому

    Are you single? i want to marry you Mis ❤, thank you so much.

  • @Stardusk.
    @Stardusk. 2 роки тому

    Forever aproaching your voice so goddess please consume us.
    To die in THAT vibrance inside your soul.
    Please.
    Just please now.
    Consider?
    Ha...

  • @Stardusk.
    @Stardusk. 2 роки тому

    Angelic voice bubling thoughts of death quotas?
    Huh.
    Too sober to be sane.
    Maybe the cafiene...
    Splicing your beam of bright-side anti-Siren tones sung with my depravity desperate, and avaracious for your knowledge.
    A being supreme beyond.
    You are too much.
    Oops.

  • @Stardusk.
    @Stardusk. 2 роки тому

    As a man before your machine with aditions, and functions while declines of your bad tooling.
    The machine is only as good as the machiner.
    Organic before mechanical.
    Your failures coming to whisper in your ear.
    Thanks girl stem person thing for this video.
    Try weaker.

  • @esoto1386
    @esoto1386 3 роки тому

    thank you!