Hmmm!... Christian REACTS To: Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is Mentioned In Bible - Mind Blowing
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 тра 2024
- Why The hiding The Truth?
#reaction #christian #islam #blessreacts
Road To 1k Babyyy
Make Sure to like 👍comment and subscribe🔔, turn on post notifications so you wouldn't miss any OF the daily reactions.
Send videos you would like me to react to on:
INSTAGRAM: / blessb__
Discord: https: / discord
Intro Music: wakeup.vzn on TikTok
Original Video: • [Shocking Truth]- Prop... - Спорт
![CHRISTIAN REACTS to [Shocking Truth]- Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is mentioned in Bible - Mind Blowing](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z3TTGw1N9qs/mqdefault.jpg)
![CHRISTIAN REACTS to [Shocking Truth]- Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is mentioned in Bible - Mind Blowing](/img/tr.png)
Brother Satan tell people to make new religion and stick with ego so that people ignore the truth. That is the reason many changes were made in bible. Jesus is our Prophet as like Muhammad
Assalam aleikum for my muslim brothers from Kazakhstan 🇰🇿
Brother I like when you have questions. It's good in a way. Becoz you will be more curious and eventually will try to learn more. Alhamdullilah 🥰
At last nice to meet a open minded person
Brother I enjoy watching you. You are a very chilling person
Beautiful Islam Quran my firend
For Power bro to controll the World
Muhammad❤
😊 the prophet series please..... We can learn together brother
You should react more video like this and find why we are here and what's our purpose of like and who created us in a perfect manner.
Muhammad is prophet for bani israel and prophet for all people in the world .
Muhammad is mentioned in every holybook .
Bani Israel more knew the charateristic of muhammad than their children .
But bani israel unbelieved , because Muhammad born from bani ismail .
I'm not arab man, i'm from indonesia, but i believe muhammad is true prophet and true messenger
The most noble person, the most influenced people is prophet Muhammad SAW. No one is equal to him. He has followers more than 1,9 billion people who is still alive plus his passed-away followers, totally his followers maybe more than 2,5 Billion. Not only followers but following what he teach such as sholat ( prayer ) 5 x /day, Fasting, not drinking alcoholic drink, not eating haram (pork) etc. His name is said ( called ) by his followers every day at least 5 billion times a day all over the world. What is the fact ? Every muslims do prayer ( sholat ) at least five times a day. In one sholat at least we called asyhha duannaMuhammadurasulAllah 2 times by every moslem doing sholat plus shalah sunnah, plus Sholawat,Adzan from Mosques, from medias etc and this is done every day by his followers, 1,9 Billion followers plus all medias. So his name is said at least 5 Billions or more every day? Who is more noble than him? Jesus? No. No follower of Jesus following what he teach. Most of those who describe theirself as follower of Jesus they still drink alcoholic, eating pork, having statues,Idol etc.
❤❤❤
Subhanallah look at the last verse in 15:55 Allah said “Those to whom we gave the Scripture recognise him (Muhammad) as they recognise their sons. Yet a group of them hide the truth knowingly.” Allah knew that they would hide Muhammad’s name in the bible. Subhanallah I’m not surprised because Allah is the all knowing and all hearing.
The Jews have always refused to accept that a prophet was sent other than their people, so they changed several verses in the Old Testament Bible and covered up the truth. they thought the last prophet would be sent from their people from the descendants of Israel (Jacob) through the prophet Ishaq. it turns out that the last prophet sent was from the descendants of the prophet Ismael the first son of Abraham pbuh.
One things is they Jesus (pbuh) never once claimed to be god or ever said “i am god” or “worship me” the Roman pagans added the trinity to make Jesus look like he was god. It is even know by historians that this is true. There is only one God and that is Allah.
Bro it does make sence why they wouldn't put the proper name, the reason is because in islam the trinity is refuted, so by putting the name in everyone would have known the trinity is false.... Do you think after knowing the name of the next prophet people would have stayed on Christianity
Deedat was also wrong about the seven spirits in the Book of Revelations. Because the seven spirits in the Book of Revelations discribes the seven attributes of one Holy Spirit:
1) The Spirit of the LORD
2) The Spirit of wisdom
3) The Spirit of understanding
4) The Spirit of counsel
5) The Spirit of power
6) The Spirit of knowledge
7) The Spirit of the fear of the Lord
These 'seven spirits of God' in the book of Revelation are a reference to the Holy Spirit in the perfection of His manifold ministry.
You are also confused, deedat was a renowned scholar and many top level scholars were there if he makes a mistake. You need to learn more about deedat and then do comments
@gsrudeyt Hello? Are u kidding? Deedat a scholar? To be clear: Deedat was not officially educated. Just look on the internet for his education, and you find something like this:
'Deedat was born in the town of Tadkeshwar, Surat, Bombay Presidency, British India in 1918. His father had emigrated to South Africa shortly after his birth. At the age of 9, Deedat left India to join his father in what is now known as Kwazulu-Natal. His mother died only a few months after his departure. Arriving in South Africa, Deedat applied himself with diligence to his studies, overcoming the language barrier and excelling in school, even getting promoted until he completed standard 6. However, due to financial circumstances, he had to quit school and start working by the time he was at the age of 16. .....
... He started attending Islamic study classes held by a local Muslim convert named Mr. Fairfax. Seeing the popularity of the classes, Mr. Fairfax offered to teach an extra session on the Bible and how to preach to Christians about Islam. Shortly thereafter, Fairfax had to pull out and Deedat, by this point quite knowledgeable about the Bible, took over teaching the class, which he did for three years. Deedat was never formally trained as a Muslim scholar.' Source wkpd
@gsrudeyt So Deedat had no formal education, let alone education in the classic Hebrew language.
Never did Deedat refer to a Hebrew dictionary or lexicon, and never did He refer to a high valuated Hebrew scholar to prove his point.
But in front of an ignorant and gullible audience, he made up the unproven conspiracy that the Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים, ‘ma-kha-madim’ is wrongly translated. And his audience in their ignorance and gullibility believed him blindly.
Also did he pronounce the Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים not as 'ma-kha-madim’ but wronly as ‘muhamaddim’. Also, here in the same way his ignorant and gullible audience believed him blindly.
And also made Deedat the deceptive false premise the Hebrew ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' as a name, meanwhile it is not a name. And also here his ignorant and gullible audience accepted this lie blindly.
Clearly, Deedat was a showman, a l!ar, and a deceiver.
@gsrudeyt But if I'm wrong, then please correct me with clear evidence. Just show me one high valuated Hebrew dictionary or lexicon which clearly states that the Hebrew מַחְמַד is a name and pronounced as 'Muhammad'.
they were scared they become muslims
I noticed one thing u kept saying it the whole video, why did they hide the name and didn’t write it down as it is? Let me ask you this,, if u were the owner of a big business company and u got an information will help u to grow up ur business and at the same time if the other companies knew about it u will lose everything, would u tell the other companies? It’s the same case here, if they did that then any logical Christian will ask, if that’s Mohammed then why not follow him as Jesus command me here? Eventually, this information will be the end of the elite religious people who actually control the faith and get a big benefits and a lot of money in the religion’s name by the ordinary simple people who didn’t do their homework and just prefer to do what they been told. Finally, everyone of us will choose his own way and path and I hope u won’t be among the lazy ones 😂
Peace ✌🏻
U can’t say lose everything brother. But to answer you correctly it really depends. I respect Islam and it’s values which go along with the teachings of God(Allah). Islam is definitely a religion I would love to follow
Brother why don't you upload shorts video
I will start doing them
Islam is so simple worship the creator who has no deity. He is one. and is apart of no trinity there is no one equivalent to him. He created the heavens and the earth and all that is in it. Just worship the god who created you. Not a trinity that not even Jesus claimed. He is the most merciful. La illaha ill Allah ☝🏾
Come on brother, you know more than us that’s the question why is Jesus a white man on the cross one everybody knows he was middle eastern (Aramaic) ?
I can tell your really sincere. Please before it’s too late deep down you know ISLAM is the TRUTH ☪️ COME BACK TO ALLAH (The GOD) and come to ISLAM.
They took out the name because the jews dont want muhammed thats why because he is an arab they have been waiting for the next prophet back in them times but becaus ehe was arab they didnnot want him they wanted him to be a jew you understand abrahim married 2 women hajaar and sara now hajaar was arab and the prophet muhammed peace be upon him is from the lineage of eshmael do you understand they cannot accept they dont want they only want it to be a jew this is why i'm back, then they even knew he was going to be in mecca they knew he was a peophet back then the jews knew but they couldnt accept him out of pride they kept saying his fake only because they wanted a jew not an arab hope u understand
Good point. Gotta look more into this
Scholars in classic Hebrew apply high valuated Hebrew dictionaries and lexicons for analysing the Tanakh. Like the Brown Driver Briggs Hebrew and English / BDB, HALOT, DCH and Jastrow, etc.
And they are very clear about the Hebrew מַחְמַד:
Noun masculine
Meaning: desire, desirable thing
Pronounce: makh-mawd
So there is no pronunciation of 'Muhammad'. And it is clearly a masculine noun. So it is not a name. So it is impossible that it refers to Muhammad.
Abraham was never married with Hagar. Hagar was the slave of his real wife Sarah. And in your point of view was Ishmael a half-brother of Isaac. But that is not in the eyes of God. First of all, the bloodline of Ishmael came via Hagar, via the servant of his wife, due to the choice of a human. Nowadays, we call that a bastard child. But Isaac came via Sarah, his wife, due to the choice by God. Second, and most important, God said to Abraham: “Take now your son, your ONLY son, whom you love, Isaac, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I will tell you.” Genesis 22:2.
Also in verse 12 is Isaac called the only son of Abraham: ‘He said, “Do not reach out your hand against the boy, and do not do anything to him; for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, YOUR ONLY SON, from Me.”
And also in verse 16: “By Myself I have sworn, declares the Lord, because you have done this thing and have not withheld your son, YOUR ONLY SON,”
So in the eyes of God is Isaac the ONLY SON of Abraham. So Ishmael is NO brother of Isaac because he was not a real son of Abraham in the eyes of God. So the descendants of Ishmael are no brothers of the Israelites. That's also why the covenant was established via Isaac and not via Ishmael.
"But I will establish My covenant with Isaac, whom Sarah will bear to you at this season next year.” Genesis 17:21
And never did the Jews wait for a prophet outside Israel, let alone from the Arabs. Nowhere does their Scriptures say that a prophet will come from the Arabs.
Muhammad is mentioned in the Bible and Jesus is mentioned in the Quran! So, what?
Sure, Muhammad is mentioned in Matthew 7:15.
Is Muhammad predicted in Songs of Solomon 5:16?
חִכֹּו֙ מַֽמְתַקִּ֔ים וְכֻלֹּ֖ו מַחֲמַדִּ֑ים זֶ֤ה דֹודִי֙ וְזֶ֣ה רֵעִ֔י בְּנֹ֖ות יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃
ḥikwō maməṯaqqîm wəḵullwō maḥămadîm zeh ḏwōḏî wəzeh rē‘î bənwōṯ yərûšālāim:
“His mouth is most sweet; he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.”
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of ‘Muhammad’.
Also the claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. First of all, nowhere in Songs of Solomon 5 it speaks about אֱלהִים, elohim, the masculine noun for a godhead. But Song of Solomon 5 speaks about ממתקים, mamtaqim and מחמדים, ma-kha-madim. So you can't compare apples with oranges. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble.
Forms of the same Hebrew word are also used elsewhere in the Old Testament, yet Islamic ‘scholars' do not claim that those passages refer to Muhammad. Rightly so, since those verses cannot be forced to fit the notion that Muhammad is under consideration. For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would Deedat contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem?
Additional occurrences of the same word are seen in 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chronicles 36:19; Lamentations 1:10,11; Ezekiel 24:16,21,25; Hosea 9:9,16; Joel 3:5. Is in this cases also Muhammad mentioned? If yes, why? If not, why not?
So in Songs of Solomon there is no Muhammad.
Will be getting more information on this
@@blessreacts My friend, in your video you asked why they left out the name of Muhammad or why did they translated it wrong. Well, nothing is hidden, removed or wrongly translated. Hebrew scholars apply high valuated Hebrew dictionaries and lexicons for analysing the Tanakh. Like the Brown Driver Briggs Hebrew and English / BDB, HALOT, DCH and Jastrow, etc.
And they are very clear about the Hebrew מַחְמַד:
Noun masculine
Meaning: desire, desirable thing
Pronounce: makh-mawd
So NO 'Muhammad'. And it is clearly a masculine NOUN. So it is NOT a name. So it is IMPOSSIBLE that it refers to Muhammad.
@@blessreacts Deedat had no formal education, let alone education in the classic Hebrew language. So Deedat was no scholar in classic Hebrew. And never did Deedat refer to a Hebrew dictionary or lexicon and never did He refer to a high valuated Hebrew scholar to prove his point.
But in front of an ignorant and gullible audience, he made up the unproven conspiracy that the Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים, ‘ma-kha-madim’ is wrongly translated. And his audience in their ignorance and gullibility believed him blindly.
Also did he pronounce the Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים not as 'ma-kha-madim’ but wronly as ‘muhamaddim’. Also here in the same way his ignorant and gullible audience believed him blindly.
And also made Deedat the deceptive false premise the Hebrew ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' as a name, meanwhile it is not a name. And also here his ignorant and gullible audience accepted this lie blindly.
Clearly Deedat was a showman, a liar and a deceiver. Please don't fall in his trap.
@@reneandjohnif you translate מחמדים from hebrew to arabic, muhammad will appear, as well as english and indonesian... you can't dodge now, you're just covering up the truth with nonsense😂😂😂
@@reneandjohnJewish rabbis confirm the word מחמדים is the name of Muhammad, the rabbis are smarter than you, the rabbis know more Hebrew than you hahaha😂
Jesus only prophet and massager of God. He's not God
When you read John 14-16 in context, then it will become clear that the Paracletos (translated as Comforter or Helper) does not fit Muhammad at all. First of all, in John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples.
But Muhammad was not with the disciples (John 14:17).
And Muhammad was not in the disciples after Jesus Christ's ascension (John 14:17).
Muhammad was not sent in Jesus' name (John 14:26).
Muhammad was not the Holy Spirit (John 14:26).
Muhammad did not teach the disciples (John 14:26).
Muhammad did not remember the disciples everything what Jesus Christ has said to them (John14:26).
Muhammad is not sent by Jesus Christ (John 15:26 and 16:7).
Muhammad did not testify about Jesus Christ to the disciples (John 15:26).
Muhammad did not guide the disciples in all truth (John 16:13).
Muhammad did not disclose it to the disciples (John 16:13).
Muhammad did not glorify Jesus Christ (John 16:14).
Muhammad did not become his 'revelation' from Jesus Christ (John 16:14 and 16:15).
So the Paracletos is definitely not Muhammad.
Nowhere in the Jewish and Christian Scriptures is Muhammad mentioned.
You dont know your scripture well, whats new that holy spirit brings? Jesus said, he will go first then the spirit of truth shall come.
@Jay Kassim Clearly, you never have read John 14-16. If you read these phrases, then it will become clear that in John 14-16, Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples. And to His disciples He said:
"But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you." John 14:26
So, the Paracletos (Helper) is the Holy Spirit with a special purpose for the disciples. E.g. to remind them everything what Jesus Christ has said to them.
I was not there 2000 years ago, and neither was Muhammad. So your question is not applicable.
@@jaykassim3474 And b.t.w. Jesus Christ said two times that the Paracletos, the Spirit of truth, will be sent by Him. Now I ask you, is Muhammad sent by Jesus Christ?
I'm curious about your answer.
@@reneandjohnbrother the very verse you quoted that THE FATHER WILL SEND HIM IN MY NAME who will send him the father so a question for you who will send the spirit of truth according to Jesus the father and again according to Jesus HIM so answer me will the father or the son send him 😂😂😂😂 well of course the father will send him the spirit of truth not son and the holy ghost was already there wasn't it 😂😂😂so why did Jesus say If I will go then he'll come beech 😂😂
@user-kg6lz7fo8p It is always funny to see that you Muslims have never read what the Scriptures actually say. Two times, it is stated that it is Jesus WHO sends the Paraclete. Read John 15:26 and John 16:7. And John 14:26 describes HOW the Paraclete is sent by Jesus Christ: the Father sends in Jesus' NAME.
The Father will also ‘give’(δώσει, Dōsei in Greek) the Paraclete. And Jesus will ‘send’ (πέμψω, pempsō in Greek) the Paraclete.
Also John 15:26: “But when the Helper comes, whom I WILL SEND to you FROM THE FATHER, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness about me.”
Now I ask you, is Muhammad sent y Jesus Christ?
And is Muhammad sent in Jesus' name?