Christian reacts to Prophet Muhammad (phub)is mentioned in Bible (the SHOCKING Truth!)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 жов 2022
- #Islam #christianity #quran
Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is mentioned in Bible (the SHOCKING Truth!) Original Video:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_mm9...
Today, as a Christian Orthodox I react to Rational Believer Video
Prophet Muhammad (phub) is mentioned in Bible (the SHOCKING Truth!)
God bless!
If you enjoy this video and my reactions make sure you subscribe to the channel, like the video and comment down below which video you would like to see me react to next.
This is a reaction video used to educated and give my feedback on the song and Artists
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS.
Muhammad (pbuh) is prophesised in the book of Isaiah:
It is mentioned in the book of Isaiah chapter 29 verse 12:
“And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned.”
When Archangel Gabrail commanded Muhammad (pbuh) by saying Iqra - “Read”, he replied, “I am not learned”.
subhan'Allah!! i didnt know this one
Lol you she couldn't handle tomuch truth at once even
Even dead, Mr. Deedat is still qualified more than any of your best chrestian scholars, he was an expert in comparative religions, he had memorised your whole bible (old/new), thing that none jewish or christian scholar has done until today, he was and still qualified even in his grave, exposing priests's and pastors's lies about there scriptures, making them sweathing while he was debating them.( may Allah have mercy on him
Your facial expression of disbelief is amazing. You can keep on shaking your head😅
My sister is like u don't understand english
Sister you have such a pure soul don't give up searching for the truth GOD bless you
Christians say that the Comforter mentioned in these prophecies refers to the Holy Sprit. They fail to realise
that the prophecy clearly says that only if Jesus (pbuh) departs will the Comforter come. The Bible states that the
Holy Spirit was already present on earth before and during the time of Jesus (pbuh), in the womb of Elizabeth, and again when Jesus (pbuh) was being baptised, etc. Hence this prophecy refers to none other than Prophet
Muhammad (pbuh).
Holy Spirit already there? So what? In John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to his disciples who had NOT received the Holy Spirit YET.
And also after Jesus Christ's ascension the Holy Spirit was NOT on earth anymore, because Jesus Christ has gone away so the Holy Spirit also with Him.
So your saying 'the Holy Spirit was already there' will not help you.
But Jesus Christ said to His disciples: “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and remind you of all that I said to you." John 14:26. It is clear that Paracletos is the Holy Spirit. So clearly not the Christians but Jesus Christ Himself said that the Paracletos (Comforter, Helper) is the Holy Spirit. The Paracletos has a special role of the Holy Spirit for the disciples. E.g. to remind them everything which Jesus Christ has said to them.
Muhammad was not the Holy Spirit, so the Paracletos is NOT Muhammad.
In the video mr Deedat referred to some sayings of Jesus Christ in the Gospel via John chapter 16. But Deedat deliberately omitted the context. Because when you read John 14-16 then it will become clear that the Paracletos does NOT fit Muhammad at all. First of all in John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples. And Muhammad was NOT with the disciples. Muhammad was NOT in the disciples after Jesus Christ's ascension. Muhammad was NOT sent in Jesus name. Muhammad was NOT the Holy Spirit. Muhammad did NOT teach the disciples. Muhammad did NOT remember the disciples everything what Jesus Christ has said to them. Muhammad is NOT sent by Jesus Christ. Muhammad did NOT testify about Jesus Christ to the disciples. Muhammad did NOT guide the disciples in all truth. Muhammad did NOT disclose it to the disciples. Muhammad did NOT glorify Jesus Christ. Muhammad did NOT become his 'revelation' from Jesus Christ. So the Paracletos is definitely NOT Muhammad.
Accept the truth. They've translated the name of Muhammad as altogether lovely.
Surah Maryam Next please Listen it
May Allah bless and guide you to the right part aameen
Dear Sister, you should react The Differences Between The Bible With The Quran by Sheikh Ahmad Deedat video. May Allah SWT bless you
as far as i seeing among most of the african christians is this : Matthew 13:13 (ASV) Therefore speak I to them in parables; because seeing they see not, and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.
LOL, SHE REALLY REALLY WANNA CRY TO HEAR TOO MUCH THE TRUTH😂🤣
Masha Alh welcome Sista To islam
, when prophet Muhammad pbuh is there means whatever Quran said about Jesus pbuh is true and was a prophet too, no GOD or trinity.
Today bible corrupted, many contradiction. Even the priest could not answer.
Your mind is closed 🔒🔒🔒🔒
Whether you like it or not, this is the truth. You are just a believer of blind faith, and he is a scholar who has studied all religions
I Believe in Jesus the son of God who died to save me so now I have grace to come to To GOD as his child unblemished by sin and death. That is my Faith.
@@nomeereacts1101
Use your mind, I never believe that God has sons or daughters, for he is the Mighty, who is content with his great self.
Let's say that God has a son Well why does God kill his innocent son for the sins of others ? Imagine that your father killed your brother because of the sins of your neighbors' children
@@hoops3836 Funny to see how you deliberately removed the context. Beside God gave His only Son He also raised Him victorious from death. So the story does not end at death.
@@reneandjohn God kill his son come on man stop man the bad story the son also God and he die =God die 😄🙆🏽♂️
@@hoops3836 Did you remove your comment by yourself or is it done by youtube?
I know it is hard for you to believe the truth, the truth not everyone can handle. there is blind belief and true belief.
My allah guide you
Great reaction sister 😎💪
what's great about it!!!??
Thank you 😁
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 for Your mind and your Book
it's not the eyes are blind...it's the heart..
.
22:30 👌
Excellent video. But you have a serious microphone problem, please fix it. I can't hear anything you are saying in the video.
i will thanks
Try to read the life of Muhammad pbuh then read the ur bible. Deuteronomy, Isaiah, John....
Sister Jesus Christ did not die for your sins that's the teaching of Paul and pastures.
If God is one and three at a time, then who was the God in heaven when Jesus was on earth? Wouldn’t this contradict his many references to a God in Heaven that sent him?
Ahmad deedat is a liar, he just pick a verse from bible, but he doesn't know that you can't read bible like that, bible not same like quran. You must read a whole chapter if he apply what he says in whole chapter it his claim get destroy
If you belive to Jesus...that is what is Jesus says...❤
Prove you have the holy spirit .
React to truth About Christianity by merciful servant
Laugh sis hahah laugh sis hahahahah se y after death sis laugh sis see y after death
Please inform yourself about Deedat. He is a great scholar of the bible who has debated with other scholar of the bible and never lost one.
wow really but if you find out well enough you wow know better
@@nomeereacts1101 He also knows by heart the old and the new testament
No, Deedat was no scholar. He was not even officially educated. Let alone he was educated in Hebrew and Koine Greek. He was just a showman.
@@reneandjohn indeed he was a showman but he knew what he talked about
@@amiralbahr5038 No, he did not.
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of 'Muhammad'
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name. And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of Muhammad.
You're just elaborating but you didn't even provide one reference from your Bible yet you disagree with someone who studied the Bible for 40 years
just read Quran and compare it with original bible if you don't like to listen, first prove which book is book of GOD by scientific and mathematical proof. you heard jew himself said that the word of MUHAMMAD PBUH is there but you r closing your eyes and ears.
*Jesus died.
(1 Corinthians 15:3-4)
*God cannot Die
(1Timothy 1:17)
*Jesus was tempted.
(Hebrews 4:15 )
*God cannot be tempted (James 1:13)
*Jesus was seen
(Jhon 1:29)
*God can't be seen
( 1 John 4:12)
*Jesus was and is a man
(1 Timothy 2:5)
*God is not man
(Numbers 23:19)
*Jesus had to grow
and learn
(Hebrews 5:8-9 )
* God not need to grow and learn
( Isaiah 40:28 )
*Jesus needed salvation.
(Hebrews 5:7)
*God does not need salvation (Hebrews 5:7 )
*Jesus grew weary
(John 4:6)
*God can't grow weary (Isaiah 40:28)
*Jesus slept
(Matthew 8:24)
*God doesn't Slumber (Psalm 121:2-4)
*Jesus wasn't all
powerful
(John 5:19)
*God is all powerful (omnipotent) (Isaiah 45:5-7)
*Jesus wasn't all
knowing
(Mark 13:32 )
*God is all knowing (omniscient) (Isaiah 46:10)
You answered very well..Bravo!
God said Jesus Christ is his son whom he is well pleased. everything Jesus Christ did was through God. Mattew 3:17 and John 17:3 and John 17:20-23
Totally off topic. And even off topic you proved you don't understand what Scriptures say.
Sure Jesus as human died in the flesh but did not cease to exist. B.t.w. thank u for admitting that Jesus died, so you confirmed the mistake in Surah 4:157.
Sure God cannot die in the sense of cease to exist.
Sure Jesus Christ was tempted. But during His mission in this world Jesus Christ was submitted to the will of the Father as human. So He could be tempted.
Sure people could see Jesus Christ's carnal body in the physical world. But we cannot see God's greatness in His heaven and earth. Let alone we can overview it.
And no Jesus Christ did not need salvation because He is the Salvation, the only way to the Father. John 14:6
And as I told you during His mission in this world Jesus Christ was submitted to the will of the Father. That's why He was not all knowing, He could oy do things by the Father, etc.
During His mission Jesus is both the only Son God and human. And as a human, Jesus was under the law and was obligated to keep the law (Gal. 4:4). In His humbled state of being lower than the angels (Heb. 2:9), Jesus was cooperating with the limitations of being a man (Phil. 2:5-8). Therefore, He was in complete subjection to the Father so that He might fulfil the law and be the high priest sacrifice for our sins (Heb. 5:10). Therefore Jesus could do nothing without the Father, the Father was greater than Him, had a God, etc.. therefore these verses do not mean that Jesus is not divine; but it does mean that Jesus, as a man, was completely and totally in submission to the will of the Father and that Jesus would only do the will of the Father as the text clearly says. But this was during His mission. But Jesus talks about His status outside His mission.
As example Jesus existed before creation. “And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.” John 17:5
If Jesus was just a mere prophet, tell me which other prophet already existed before the creation?
Jesus was also in the presence of the Father before the creation. If Jesus was just a mere prophet, tell me which other prophet was in the presence of the Father before the creation?
Jesus had also the same glory as the Father before the creation. If Jesus was just a mere prophet, tell me which other prophet had the same glory as the Father before the creation?
Jesus has the authority to judge. "For not even the Father judges anyone, but He has given all the judgment to the Son, so that all will honor the Son as well as they honor the Father. John 5: 22-23
If Jesus was just a mere prophet, tell me which other prophet has the authority to judge the living and the dead?
Jesus was finally given all power again in heaven and on earth. "And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to me in heaven and on earth” " Matthew 28:18
If Jesus was just a mere prophet, tell me which other prophet has all authority in heaven and earth?
Jesus is the truth, the live and the only way to the Father. "Jesus said to him," I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me. "John 14:6
If Jesus was just a mere prophet, tell me which other prophet is the only way to the father?
Tell me which other prophet has the same authority?
And now on topic Is Muhammad predicted in Songs of Solomon 5:16?
חִכֹּו֙ מַֽמְתַקִּ֔ים וְכֻלֹּ֖ו מַחֲמַדִּ֑ים זֶ֤ה דֹודִי֙ וְזֶ֣ה רֵעִ֔י בְּנֹ֖ות יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃
ḥikwō maməṯaqqîm wəḵullwō maḥămadîm zeh ḏwōḏî wəzeh rē‘î bənwōṯ yərûšālāim:
“His mouth is most sweet; he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.”
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to Muhammad.
Also the claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble.
Forms of the same Hebrew word are also used elsewhere in the Old Testament, yet Islamic ‘scholars' do not claim that those passages refer to Muhammad. Rightly so, since those verses cannot be forced to fit the notion that Muhammad is under consideration. For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would the Islamic ‘scholars' contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem?
Additional occurrences of the same word are seen in 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chronicles 36:19; Lamentations 1:10,11; Ezekiel 24:16,21,25; Hosea 9:9,16; Joel 3:5. Is in this cases also Muhammad mentioned? If yes, why? If not, why not?
So in Songs of Solomon no Muhammad.
Also the context, the Song of Solomon is about a beautiful young girl (Shulammite maiden) who is in love with a young shepherd boy. One day Solomon spots her and has her eventual brought to his residence where he tries to entice her to become another of his wives. The young shepherd follows and finds her and assures her of his love. She resist all the enticements, charms, riches, and luxurious life of a wife to the King. Finally she escapes and returns to her true love the humble shepherd boy. So it has nothing to do with Muhammad.
Lastly sister which Bible are you talking about because there are many and they are different as catholic is different protestant so are their Bible's
Protestant 66 books
Catholic 73 books
Orthodox 81 books
I can go on and on
So which is the inspired word of God and who is lead by the holy spirit because they all claim to be
If Muhammad peace be upon him is mentioned in the Bible than you must follow the action that come from the verse itself which is listen and obey the teaching of Muhammad peace be upon him.
What is our evidence? The Quran is the evidence from Almighty God via Muhammad peace be upon him. So your choice available is to listen to “the conversation between Jesus and Allah”.
You are welcome to react to the mentioned video title above.
But Muhammad is not mentioned in the Bible so there is no need to pay attention to Muhammad. I will give you many examples how wrong Deedat was in this video.
Is Muhammad predicted in Songs of Solomon 5:16?
חִכֹּו֙ מַֽמְתַקִּ֔ים וְכֻלֹּ֖ו מַחֲמַדִּ֑ים זֶ֤ה דֹודִי֙ וְזֶ֣ה רֵעִ֔י בְּנֹ֖ות יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃
ḥikwō maməṯaqqîm wəḵullwō maḥămadîm zeh ḏwōḏî wəzeh rē‘î bənwōṯ yərûšālāim:
“His mouth is most sweet; he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.”
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to Muhammad.
Also the claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble.
Forms of the same Hebrew word are also used elsewhere in the Old Testament, yet Islamic ‘scholars' do not claim that those passages refer to Muhammad. Rightly so, since those verses cannot be forced to fit the notion that Muhammad is under consideration. For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would the Islamic ‘scholars' contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem?
Additional occurrences of the same word are seen in 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chronicles 36:19; Lamentations 1:10,11; Ezekiel 24:16,21,25; Hosea 9:9,16; Joel 3:5. Is in this cases also Muhammad mentioned? If yes, why? If not, why not?
So in Songs of Solomon no Muhammad.
Also the context, the Song of Solomon is about a beautiful young girl (Shulammite maiden) who is in love with a young shepherd boy. One day Solomon spots her and has her eventual brought to his residence where he tries to entice her to become another of his wives. The young shepherd follows and finds her and assures her of his love. She resist all the enticements, charms, riches, and luxurious life of a wife to the King. Finally she escapes and returns to her true love the humble shepherd boy. So it has nothing to do with Muhammad.
In the video mr Deedat referred to some sayings of Jesus Christ in the Gospel via John chapter 16. But Deedat deliberately omitted the context. Because when you read John 14-16 then it will become clear that the Paracletos does NOT fit Muhammad at all. First of all in John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples. And Muhammad was NOT with the disciples. Muhammad was NOT in the disciples after Jesus Christ's ascension. Muhammad was NOT sent in Jesus name. Muhammad was NOT the Holy Spirit. Muhammad did NOT teach the disciples. Muhammad did NOT remember the disciples everything what Jesus Christ has said to them. Muhammad is NOT sent by Jesus Christ. Muhammad did NOT testify about Jesus Christ to the disciples. Muhammad did NOT guide the disciples in all truth. Muhammad did NOT disclose it to the disciples. Muhammad did NOT glorify Jesus Christ. Muhammad did NOT become his 'revelation' from Jesus Christ. So the Paracletos is definitely NOT Muhammad.
And also about the seven spirits made Deedat the wrong conclusion. The seven spirits in the Book of Revelations discribes the seven attributes of one Holy Spirit:
1) The Spirit of the LORD
2) The Spirit of wisdom
3) The Spirit of understanding
4) The Spirit of counsel
5) The Spirit of power
6) The Spirit of knowledge
7) The Spirit of the fear of the Lord
These 'seven spirits of God' in the book of Revelation are a reference to the Holy Spirit in the perfection of His manifold ministry.
And also about 1 John 4 was Deedat very wrong. Let's analyse 1 John 4:
“Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.”. But the verse is clear e.g. in the word ‘because’. In Greek “ὅτι’ = ‘hoti” which means ’that’ or ‘since’ or ‘because’. Clearly this verse only states that spirits are the result of the presence of false prophets in the world. So 1 John 4:1 clearly states that false prophets are the course and spirits are the result. That makes clear that prophets and spirits are NOT the same, they are two different types of entities.
Let's assume it's Muhammad's name.
Problem 1 Quran 7:157 says the Jews and Christians find Muhammad written in the Torah and Injil. Song of Solomon is not Torah or Injil.
Problem 2 Quran 3:55 .... I will deliver you from those who disbelieve, and elevate your followers (Jesus) above the disbelievers until the Day of Judgment....
Matthew 24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in all the world as a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come. Jesus words
Quran 5:43 But why do they come to you for judgment (Muhammad) when they ˹already˺ have the ...Torah... containing Allah’s judgment, then they turn away after all? They are not ˹true˺ believers.
notice corrupted or following Muhammad is not the issue with the Jews.
600 years after Jesus received Injil. Jews didn't need Muhammad, who is meant to be in their Torah.
Problem 3 No historical evidence from the time Song of Solomon was revealed to the time Quran claims Jews and Christians find Muhammad in Torah and Injil No one talks about the name Muhammad.
Hadith (Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2653) (Tawrah and Injil are with the Jews and Christians) Muhammad speaking 600 years after Jesus received Injil.
Sister with all due respect you ask who wrote the book of Solomon "is it God?" This is after all in your Bible and if that verse had a prophecy about Jesus Christ then you wouldn't say it's just from a song
You actually didn't refute a single issue he raised Al you did was say he doesn't know what he's talking about
Sister Jesus prayed to God to save him from death a death that you were taught to believe had to happen for your salvation
Jesus according to your Bible did not die willingly but you believe he did
He went into the garden of Gethsemane praying asking God to save him
He was on the cross according to your Bible and asked why God forsook him
You are diagressing my sister, was the English translation translated from Hebrew and Greek or vise versa.
For God says in the Bible that he is not an author of confusion.
You can't believe the truth😂😂😂😂😂😂
Maybe you are convinced and you don't want to accept it
давай шамана
blind heart
You pass away from the truth sister because muhamad pbuh is mentionned in many places in the bible
The fault is not yours but the fault of those who hide the truth
My sister you are full of doctrines. Relax and learn to know the truth. There's a difference between church doctrines and bible teachings. What Deedat was saying is too big for you to understand.
Remember Jesus didn't speak English.
Prophet Muhammad was the son of?
Muhammad is NOT in the Bible, it's not hard. We have nothing to do with that supposed prophet much less care about what he did. Worshiping plagiarism is not a religion. This is part of the TOP 10 lies muslims say.
Sister thanks, but u know the whole bible wasn't from God, it was written according to groups of men whom didn't even see Jesus pbuh. The bible was written by people after Jesus pbuh was gone
Are you sure? What prove do you have... new testament writen by people who knew Jesus. His disciple... don't tell lie, what i know is quran got written hundred years after prophet die. And get burn once, that make a big question why the perfect alquran get burn.
@@silentsart2011 the Quran was memorised during the time of Muhammad, he specifically choose people who will memories the Quran and some who wrote it down on rocks, bones and dried skin of animals
Deedat also made the wrong conclusion about the gender in John 16. It is correct that every noun in the Koine Greek has a gender. But the gender of nouns, not pronouns but nouns, in which they refer can differ indeed. Like in John 1:4: "In him (M) was life (F), and that life (F) was the light (M) of all mankind." So a female noun wich refers to a neuter noun. So in the same way as in John 4:24 "God (M) is Spirit (N)..." is in John 14 the Paracletos (M) is Spirit (N).
And yes, the Paracletos is a person but not a human. Not a human because it is a Spirit (John 14:17), the Holy Spirit (John 14:26), which the world cannot see (John 14:17) and is in people (John 14:17). So Deedat 'argument' fails. And so no prophet in John 14-16, let alone Muhammad.
And also about the seven spirits made Deedat the wrong conclusion. The seven spirits in the Book of Revelations discribes the seven attributes of one Holy Spirit:
1) The Spirit of the LORD
2) The Spirit of wisdom
3) The Spirit of understanding
4) The Spirit of counsel
5) The Spirit of power
6) The Spirit of knowledge
7) The Spirit of the fear of the Lord
These 'seven spirits of God' in the book of Revelation are a reference to the Holy Spirit in the perfection of His manifold ministry.
Women ☕☕
Keep on researching! You are only beginning to be exposed to the truth.
And also about 1 John 4 was Deedat very wrong. Let's analyse 1 John 4:
“Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.”. But the verse is clear e.g. in the word ‘because’. In Greek “ὅτι’ = ‘hoti” which means ’that’ or ‘since’ or ‘because’. Clearly this verse only states that spirits are the result of the presence of false prophets in the world. So 1 John 4:1 clearly states that false prophets are the course and spirits are the result. That makes clear that prophets and spirits are NOT the same, they are two different types of entities.
In the video mr Deedat referred to some sayings of Jesus Christ in the Gospel via John chapter 16. But Deedat deliberately omitted the context. Because when you read John 14-16 then it will become clear that the Paracletos does NOT fit Muhammad at all. First of all in John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples. And Muhammad was NOT with the disciples. Muhammad was NOT in the disciples after Jesus Christ's ascension. Muhammad was NOT sent in Jesus name. Muhammad was NOT the Holy Spirit. Muhammad did NOT teach the disciples. Muhammad did NOT remember the disciples everything what Jesus Christ has said to them. Muhammad is NOT sent by Jesus Christ. Muhammad did NOT testify about Jesus Christ to the disciples. Muhammad did NOT guide the disciples in all truth. Muhammad did NOT disclose it to the disciples. Muhammad did NOT glorify Jesus Christ. Muhammad did NOT become his 'revelation' from Jesus Christ. So the Paracletos is definitely NOT Muhammad.
Is Muhammad predicted in Songs of Solomon 5:16?
חִכֹּו֙ מַֽמְתַקִּ֔ים וְכֻלֹּ֖ו מַחֲמַדִּ֑ים זֶ֤ה דֹודִי֙ וְזֶ֣ה רֵעִ֔י בְּנֹ֖ות יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃
ḥikwō maməṯaqqîm wəḵullwō maḥămadîm zeh ḏwōḏî wəzeh rē‘î bənwōṯ yərûšālāim:
“His mouth is most sweet; he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.”
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to Muhammad.
Also the claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble.
Forms of the same Hebrew word are also used elsewhere in the Old Testament, yet Islamic ‘scholars' do not claim that those passages refer to Muhammad. Rightly so, since those verses cannot be forced to fit the notion that Muhammad is under consideration. For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would the Islamic ‘scholars' contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem?
Additional occurrences of the same word are seen in 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chronicles 36:19; Lamentations 1:10,11; Ezekiel 24:16,21,25; Hosea 9:9,16; Joel 3:5. Is in this cases also Muhammad mentioned? If yes, why? If not, why not?
So in Songs of Solomon no Muhammad.
Also the context, the Song of Solomon is about a beautiful young girl (Shulammite maiden) who is in love with a young shepherd boy. One day Solomon spots her and has her eventual brought to his residence where he tries to entice her to become another of his wives. The young shepherd follows and finds her and assures her of his love. She resist all the enticements, charms, riches, and luxurious life of a wife to the King. Finally she escapes and returns to her true love the humble shepherd boy. So it has nothing to do with Muhammad.
JESUS vs so-called "CHRISTIANS" today
1. Jesus teaches Monotheism; the Oneness of Allah. (Mark:12:29).
But Christians are believing and teaching Trinity in obeying Paul but disobeying Jesus.
2. Jesus believed he was a Messenger of Allah. (John, 17:3, John,7:28, John, 8:42).
But today's Paulinists believe Jesus is God. Jesus say something but Paulinists believe otherwise.
3. Jesus surrendered his will to Allah. (Mark, 3:31-35, Matthew:7:21).
But today's Paulinists don't believe in Allah but they believe their 'national god '.
4. Jesus was circumcised. (Luke, 2:21).
But today's Paulinists don't do circumcision. They oppose Jesus and follow Paul.
5. Jesus never ate pork. He despised pork. (Leviticus,11: 7).
But opposing Jesus today's Paulinists eat pork.
6. Jesus denied Trinity same as Muslims do. (John:17:3).
But Paulinists believe in Trinity.
7. Jesus had a beard and dressed modestly like Muslims.
But Paulinists despise beard and like Nudism.
8. Jesus performed ablution before prayer like all orthodox Jews do. Moses and Aaron and his sons used to wash their hands and feet. (Exodus, 40:31, John, 13:10).
But Paulinists don't do any worship like Jesus did.
9. Jesus believed only Allah has the knowledge of unseen. (Mark, 11:12-13, and 13:32).
But Paulinists say Jesus has the knowledge of unseen.
10. Jesus worshiped Allah with his face on ground as Muslims do. (Matthew, 26:39).
But Paulinists don't believe in Allah and don't pray Salah as Jesus prayed.
11. Jesus used the greetings of peace and taught his disciples to greet each other (as he do). (Luke, 10:5, John, 20:19).
But Paulinists oppose Jesus.
12. Jesus followed the LAW and forbade interest. (Exodus, 22:25).
But Paul abrogated the Law without Allah's authority.
13. Jesus fasted for more than a month. (Matthew, 4:1-2).
But Paulinists don't fast even they mock at fasting.
14. Jesus did not worship or wear the cursed cross.
But Paulinists worship and wear the cursed cross.
15. Jesus never got drunk.
16. Jesus preached Jihad. (Luke, 22:35-36, Matthew,10:32-34).
But Paulinists call it terrorism. Before talking about Jihad, learn what it means!
17. Jesus taught Salvation comes from submitting your will to Allah, Fath and good deeds same as Muslims do. (Matthew:7:21-23).
But Paulinists oppose Jesus and say otherwise.
18. Jesus believed Miracles were from Allah. (John, 5:30, Acts, 2:22).
But Paulinists believe otherwise.
19. Jesus predicted he will survive the alleged crucifixion as Muslims belief. (Matthew:12:40).
But Paulinists believe Jesus was crucified.
20. Jesus did not believe in Redemption by his Blood. (Matthew:5:17-20).
But Paulinists believe in Redemption by Jesus's blood.
21. Jesus told an evil person to thank God. But he did the opposite he thanked Jesus and went around thanking Jesus ...Christians got information from him. Till today they praising Jesus not God. Contrary to what Jesus had said.
"Return home and tell how much God has done for you." (Luke 8:39). So the man went away and told all over town how much Jesus had done for him. Remember Jesus himself was thanking God. (john 11:41)
False beliefs, false love and total opposition to Jesus.
eveeettt aynen kem küm
artık yüz ifadende anlaşıdığı üzere bu sefer anlamışa benziyorsun önceki videolara kıyasla. ama en iyi yaptığınız şeyi kendinize bile inkarı tercih edicekmişsin gibide geliyor