It’s hard for me to see why people don't find beauty in this jet. I think the whole MD-80/90/95 series was absolutely stunning. The DC-9 technically introduced the regional jet concept. I wish McDonnell-Douglas was still in business to give Boeing a run for its money! Great video as always.
I've always found the whole DC-9/MD-80/MD-90 series to be very attractive birds...perhaps my fave would be a DC-9-40 wearing late 1960s to 1970s SAS livery, but I'm an old guy. :-) Thanks Sam, for the nice words.
Just my opinion, but the last one I appreciated was the MD-80. The 83 onwards had really long fuselages which in my opinion made them less of a reg jet. I love the 717 as well but I'm an oldie so I'm the DC-9- 30/40 lover.
@TJK152 Delta says it will keep the MD-95 (known as the Boeing 717) in service until 2030....that really says something about that Mc Donnell Douglas design!
You should see the A320 production videos from 1986-7. Big hair, shoulder pads, and synth pop everywhere, and it shows how old the A320 design really is. In fact, a brand new NEO is about 95% identical to one from 30 years ago.
@@twiff3rino28 well the A320 was very advanced for its time and given how conservative aviation is, it doesn't surprise me that it hasn't changed that much.
@@planeflight1202 Those are also large, but since they were designed for business jets, they are smaller than the IAE's, which can be found on jets like the A320
Just went on vacation to Key West, Florida over new years. My first flight from Tulsa, Oklahoma to Atlanta, Georgia was on an MD-90. From what I read online, there are only 16 of them left in service now and all 16 are owned by Delta. The last new one being produced in 2000. This one must have been much older than that though because it still had ashtrays up near the lavatory and inside the lavatory lol. I may have just flown on the oldest remaining MD-90 in service lol.
@@maxsaviation9512let’s see: design flaw of cargo doors(AA Windsor Ontario, Turkish crash). Design flaw of the slats extension mechanism + safety insufficient in stall warning only to the captain + lacking configuration asymmetry warning system(AA191). Well yes it was AA maintenance that caused it but still. Design flaw in main landing gear shear structure(the flip over crashES). Design deficiency in MD11 stability characteristics(the flip over crashes and and East China airlines roller coaster in Alaska). Yeah, tough love.
If the MD80 series used cfm56 and 737 used jt8d-200s, the aviation scheme will be very very different today. 757/767 are still my favourites though. Plus the queen
Sad Fact: The MD95 was develloped in 1995 by Mcdonnell Douglas. In october 1997 MD bankrupted and was bought by Boeing which worked on finishing the MD95 project renamed Boeing 717. The 717 came out on september the 2nd 1998 a day involving another MD aircraft in a crash: the Swissair 111 MD11. :(
+Louis Brasil McDonnel Douglas was NOT bankrupted. This was a merger between both companies. In fact the McDonnel Douglas chairman became the chairman of the new Boeing.
wethead86 I know but MD was in a bad condition for being absorbe by boeing. If they merged the new compagny should have been called Mcdonnell Boeing or something. But has always Boeing had the better of it and True MD industry and style ceased to exist after the last MD project was finished by boeing the MD95 aka B717 in 1998. and after the last MD83 where producted in 1999. sad :( such a potential...gone.
Had an opportunity to fly this aircraft on Delta from Atlanta to El Paso. Loved seating in the back. On one flight had a good conversation with the flight attendant and some soldiers going to Ft Bliss. Nice aircraft.
This brings back memories I worked for McDonnell Douglas on the MD 80s and MD 90s as well as MD-11 is the one thing I remember about the MD 90s is they had a software problem with their flight control system where the aircraft would porpoise in-flight another words on commanded pictures in the elevator system I don’t know how many times I had to change elevator actuators on those things and if you noticed that’s a T tail So you had to work off an 80 foot boom lift not exactly the funnest of jobs to do in the wet weather also the fuel filters were difficult to access remember those engines were designed to be mounted under the wings not on the side of the fuselage oh well that was just me putting in my two cents God bless everyone who loves these aircraft as much as I did
Also for those who don’t know this is just me because I worked there as a mechanic but the main spotting features between the MT 90 and the MD 80 is on the MD 90 the top of the vertical stabilizer is more pronounced also on the MD 90 there are two windows between each over wing exit MD 80s only had one window over each over wing exit Anyways that’s just info in case anybody was interested once again thank you very much and God bless to you all
The A320 is practically a disposable airplane with its 56,000 hour life limit. At least 737 have a 75,000 hour limit, whereas Douglas twinjets never had any life limit and could fly forever if you don't mind the non-routines cropping up for the inevitable corrosion that everything suffers.
One thing I love about McDonnell Douglas was their aircraft introduction. I think since the DC-10-10, they revealed the aircraft to the world from the hangar with the aircraft powered by its own engines instead of having a tug tow it out. I think this shows that McDonnell Douglas was proud and confident that their aircraft was ready to fly on the very first day.
I think the MD-90 is the most attractive of the DC-9 family, mostly due to its longest length and largest engines. Just like an A340-600 is more attractive than A340-300, or DC-8 Super 70 looks better than any earlier DC-8. Long is beautiful! (I doubt anyone ever called an A310, 747SP, 737-200/500/600, or A318/319 "beautiful"...)
Aiden Bach it’s such a shame that MD went out of business as far as the commercial market is concerned. They made beautiful aircraft. Same for Lockheed.
Great to see this video. I love the style, the music, the way people dress, talk and act back then. What a great plane. A wonderful in these shortsighted, monotonousAirbus monoculture, esp. here in Europe.
I really miss this company. I wish mcdonnell douglas come back like in the old days and start making the md-90 and md-11 again. Mcdonnells douglas aircraths are very special for me. This airplane are only. I love the two extra Windows it have in the cockpet.
the soundtrack is absolutely wonderful. a garden of classic 90s ROMPler sounds - I hear some classic crap Roland JV / XV series brass, pounding Korg M1 house piano stabs in the first track, finished up with one of those perfectly bleak triumphant-ish "orchestral" pieces that every airplane documentary seems to have. wonderful upload thank you!
What a Beautiful Machine personally I, ve always loved the DC wich later became the MD 80 and now the MD 90 !! I can't understand why Mc Donald Douglas went out of Business but after all they build some Beautiful Airplane !! Personally I love the DC 9 Range and thanks for a lot of Safe Flights !!
They went out of business because they lacked innovation. After the late 1960's all they produced were derivative versions of aircraft. Boeing pretty much has gone down the same path since they merged with McDonnell Douglas in 1997. Whilst McDonnell Douglas produced good looking aircraft they were to a certain degree inferior to their competitors...
I love all of the McDonnell Douglas, Boeing and Lockheed promotional videos that you have posted. I have spent many hours watching your exceptional collection of videos and I hope to see more in the future. One question that I did have for you: Have you ever considered making a playlist of just promotional videos for each manufacturer? I would love to see any and all videos that you have for the L-1011 TriStar. My grandfather was one of tye engineers who designed the TriStar and I have always been fascinated by that aircraft. If you have any more Lockheed videos, I would sincerely appreciate it if you could post them in a dedicated playlist! :-)
Hi Peter, thanks so much for writing, and the good words! I actually have been playing around with various playlist ideas. I only built the "Airliner Promo Films" playlist about a month ago, and the entries are alphabetical. I will consider your idea, breaking it up into manufacture or airline. just not sure I have enough of 'em to warrant a playlist for each individual manufacture, but I will certainly consider it. I will have a dilemma when/if "More Classic Jetliners" fills up, because obviously, I can't call a playlist, "Even More Classic Jetliners", LOL. I suppose it should be "Classic Jetliners 1", "Classic Jetliners 2", etc, or broken down by aircraft or airline type, but on some vids, there are multiple types and airlines featured. But I'll think on this, for sure. You Tube allows 200 vids per playlist, then you have to start a new one, or "Part 2", as it were.
Classic Airliners & Vintage Pop Culture Thanks for replying to my message so fast...I wasn't expecting to hear back so soon! As I mentioned previously, I would be thrilled to see more L-1011 stuff....it wasn't until after my grandfather died that I learned about his work with the L-1011 TriStar and all of the engineering and technology that went into what became a truly supreme aircraft. In any case...please don't hesitate to contact me should you happen to come across any further Lockheed videos! Best Regards; Peter
I've got a family history with the L-1011 also, just an incredible bird, vastly superior to the DC-10, which I loved to fly in also. If only Lockheed could have gone with a small 100-120 seater to compete with the DC-9 and 737 to supplement the sales of the L-1011, providing the steady flow of $$$ needed to keep developing larger transports. In Boeings case it was the 727 that paid the way for the 747 program and later the 737.
Another thing that brings back memories to open up the engines on an empty 90 you needed a pump to open up the trust reverser cores MD-80s We’re so much easier to forward lower cowling was just hand latches the aft lower County you used to 3/8 drive wobble socket thanks for this video brings back memories it’s been over 20 years since I worked on one of these funny how some of that stuff comes back I could probably go on forever but I don’t want to bore you people once again thank you for listening to my comments
Let's face it, the MD90 is the airplane that they ought to have brought to market in 1979. Instead, while everyone else was switching to high-bypass turbofans, MacDac opted to stick to leaky turbojets.
You're right, of course, under the regs it's not a turbojet as it doesn't use the gas flow to provide usable thrust. I'm going to assume that when I wrote that, I was in the middle of a brain fart or a beer (possibly both). Although, it should be added that the turbofan is technically defined by the FAA as a subclass of turbojet, albeit with a bypass duct. Aren't the regulatory agencies fun? ;) All in good fun, of course!
Another great aircraft. This and the Boeing 727 are my favourite. I would always request a seat by the engines when i flew one of those. Noting like the intense roar of the engine a few feet from my ears. Sweet music and some great memories. The music and footage make that aircraft look so damn sexy.
I grew up near Rochester New York. The DC-9s MD-80s Boeing 727s were the main birds at the airport back in the days of old...Now it's CRJ-700s CRJ-900s E-175s, E-190s and sometimes an A320 or a Boeing 737 might show up.
You forgot about the Allegheny BAC 1-11s flying to Rochester. Later bought by USAIR, they looked a lot like a DC-9 except no eyebrow windows on the cockpit. Loved all those planes.
I traveled once on board the MD 90, in winter , it was a scary trip in stormy weather especially when I noticed it's strange tiny wings, it recalled me the widows maker Starfighter 101, I said never again.....
A great Airplane that would have gone on selling for many years if MD had not sold out to Boeing , who sadly ended production after a small vertion called the Boeing 717 was made for a short time, I believe the MD 80 & 90 has given long service to Delta and many other Airlines of the World. Planeman 789 Jersey.C.I.
The 717 is not related to the MD90 in any way except for a common lineage to the original DC-9. The 717 is based off the basic DC-9 (being about the size of a DC-9-41) while the MD90 is based on the later DC-9-80 series (which has an extended wing and horizontal stabilizer). The 717/MD95 borrows the vertical stabilizer and tailcone from the MD87, but that's about it. Boeing did in fact market the 717/MD95 heavily, but it was a decade or so ahead of its market (interestingly enough, the few that were produced are in high demand now).
We had touchscreens in the 1980's, see the HP-150 computer for example. People thought it was more intuitive and natural, but turns out holding your hand in front of the screen for long periods sucks and the mouse won.
Wow! As a huge MD-90 fan I say what a great find! Thanks. :-) Delta heralded this aircraft as its plane for the 21st Century in 1992. McDonnell Douglas did not make it into the 21st Century, but the MD-90 flies on, a testament to the aircraft and its maker.
My first flight ever was in 2004-05 on American Airlines. The pamphlets in the back of the seats said "Super 80". I wonder if I was flying on an MD-80 or an MD-90. Same thing honestly. I hate flying and will never do it again. But I will always have a special place for the Mad Dogg.
It would be intresting if boeing raised the landing gear, elonginated the fuselage, and with new engines made an economical 4th generation of the DC-9. They would really have to add some redundencies for that jackscrew though probably.
carnyboy04 The 717 is actually the MD95 a md project released by Boeing in 1998 it is a modified and modernized DC9-30 they have RR BR715 engines instead of PW engines and has a range of 3815 KM for the 717-200 hight gross weight.
This is a very cool plane. The pilots love them because it's all mechanical. I love them cuz they are quiet. I fly in business class and it dam near feels like a glider. The engines are way way way the hell back there. lol
"Historians would later note that McDonnell Douglas' failure to adapt the music in its promo films to the post-1980s world would ultimately lead to the company's untimely demise."
this was cool vid with some great shots and uber 90s one of my fav and sexiest planes flew a DL one recently from wilmington to atlanta pretty comfy i thought loved the sound honestly better than the RJ 200 from ATL to san antonio IMHO i will miss the whole series from the diesel 9 to the angry puppy
Such a beatifull plane. Shame Mcdonell douglas has gone forever and Boeing didnt continue the MD-11 and MD80 with more technology, new engines, new avionics, extended range, low emisions. Making a flying whale pointlees, bigger than a 747 or a 777 has no sense. Embraer has taken all the market fro regional Jets with quality and of course good prices and low manteniance. But MD90 was the perfect warrior for this market, with the experience of MANY decades of building planes, with erros, like every manufacturers, error that are not likely to happen again making this airframes top reliable and dependable.
38911bytefree Same, My father actually worked on the MD-11. I once read though that the aircraft wasn't all that fuel efficient and it was cheaper to operate a different aircraft like a 777, 767, or A330
The MD-90 could have been a real winner if it was built with a larger faster wing. I wished the super strech MD-90-40 was built, it would have been a cool plane.
If they had come out with this jet in 1988 and added some winglets, we may have had MD jets around today. Though really they should have added the cfm56 to the original md80 as they came about in the mid 70s.
this is the most 90's thing i've seen all day
lol 90 90
ProjectGenesis
J
J B
G
N
I want to live such a great decade
@hengky prayoga Nice collection
Agree
It’s hard for me to see why people don't find beauty in this jet. I think the whole MD-80/90/95 series was absolutely stunning. The DC-9 technically introduced the regional jet concept. I wish McDonnell-Douglas was still in business to give Boeing a run for its money! Great video as always.
I've always found the whole DC-9/MD-80/MD-90 series to be very attractive birds...perhaps my fave would be a DC-9-40 wearing late 1960s to 1970s SAS livery, but I'm an old guy. :-) Thanks Sam, for the nice words.
Alex Smith lm not sure I would say the md90 cus of the design
It's a stunner, except for the snub nose.
@TheRocktalk, the snub nose was a Douglas design trait that dates back to its first jet, the DC-8.
Just my opinion, but the last one I appreciated was the MD-80. The 83 onwards had really long fuselages which in my opinion made them less of a reg jet. I love the 717 as well but I'm an oldie so I'm the DC-9- 30/40 lover.
When I hear these tunes I get a little tear in my eye.
I don't understand why so many people complain about the soundtrack. I think it quite good. At least it doesn't sound like it was made on a laptop.
i like it too i put it on my phone actually yes i know im weird
Andrew Platek...agreed. I think the soundtrack kicks ass.
Very fitting of this beautiful bird.
AD77 I don’t know. Kinda peaceful.
I looooove it ive been tring to get the song everywhere!!!!
It sounds exactly like the era from which it came, which is why we're here right? Nostalgia?
This brings me back. I miss McDonnell Douglas and the 90s :(
Here we are now with Delta as the last airline with the MD-90 still in operation which is going to retire in June 2020. RIP MD-90 :(
@TJK152
Delta says it will keep the MD-95 (known as the Boeing 717) in service until 2030....that really says something about that Mc Donnell Douglas design!
This video is from 1994 but everyone in it looks like they're straight out of 1982.
90s hairdos and clothing had a lot of similarities with the 80s.
William Potts 1982 was a great year‼️👍👍
You should see the A320 production videos from 1986-7. Big hair, shoulder pads, and synth pop everywhere, and it shows how old the A320 design really is. In fact, a brand new NEO is about 95% identical to one from 30 years ago.
I grew up in the 1990's.
@@twiff3rino28 well the A320 was very advanced for its time and given how conservative aviation is, it doesn't surprise me that it hasn't changed that much.
Just landed on an MD-90 MSP to STL! Best flight into Saint Louis ever!
Glad to hear they're still in the air!
@@Hubjeep they aren't
@@firealarmtechguy4444 😢
Most 90’s thing ever! Love it! Long live the md-90!
Put one in a museum
RIP to the MD90 as the last one was removed from service by sole operator Delta Air Lines on 2 June 2020
Those IAE V2500 turbofans were the largest engines ever used on a McDonnell Douglas single-aisle aircraft.
John Eddy The IAE engines are an odd engine with a higher SFC than the CFM56
What about the ones on a B717 (MD95, DC9-95)?
@@planeflight1202 That was a smaller (shorter) airplane, with smaller engines.
Yeah, they look very weird on the MD-90 since the size is so large compared to the earlier MD-80 JT8D
@@planeflight1202 Those are also large, but since they were designed for business jets, they are smaller than the IAE's, which can be found on jets like the A320
Just went on vacation to Key West, Florida over new years. My first flight from Tulsa, Oklahoma to Atlanta, Georgia was on an MD-90. From what I read online, there are only 16 of them left in service now and all 16 are owned by Delta. The last new one being produced in 2000. This one must have been much older than that though because it still had ashtrays up near the lavatory and inside the lavatory lol. I may have just flown on the oldest remaining MD-90 in service lol.
New planes have ash trays. It's required in case someone lights up.
If this and the MD-11 had come out 10 years earlier than they did, McDonnell-Douglas would still be around today.
Dc10 kinda crippled Douglas
@@cityplanner3063 they accidentally made a death chamber-10 instead of a dc-10
@@rogeryscankill962almost all crashes were human error not from MD
@@maxsaviation9512let’s see: design flaw of cargo doors(AA Windsor Ontario, Turkish crash). Design flaw of the slats extension mechanism + safety insufficient in stall warning only to the captain + lacking configuration asymmetry warning system(AA191). Well yes it was AA maintenance that caused it but still. Design flaw in main landing gear shear structure(the flip over crashES). Design deficiency in MD11 stability characteristics(the flip over crashes and and East China airlines roller coaster in Alaska). Yeah, tough love.
If the MD80 series used cfm56 and 737 used jt8d-200s, the aviation scheme will be very very different today.
757/767 are still my favourites though. Plus the queen
Sad Fact:
The MD95 was develloped in 1995 by Mcdonnell Douglas.
In october 1997 MD bankrupted and was bought by Boeing which worked on finishing the MD95 project renamed Boeing 717.
The 717 came out on september the 2nd 1998 a day involving another MD aircraft in a crash: the Swissair 111 MD11. :(
+Louis Brasil McDonnel Douglas was NOT bankrupted. This was a merger between both companies. In fact the McDonnel Douglas chairman became the chairman of the new Boeing.
wethead86
I know but MD was in a bad condition for being absorbe by boeing.
If they merged the new compagny should have been called Mcdonnell Boeing or something.
But has always Boeing had the better of it and True MD industry and style ceased to exist after the last MD project was finished by boeing the MD95 aka B717 in 1998. and after the last MD83 where producted in 1999.
sad :( such a potential...gone.
Btw I. Was. Born when the. First flight of the Boeing 717
+ghostrider 115
You mean you was born the same day Swissair flight 111 crashed?
Louis Brasil yes that true
Had an opportunity to fly this aircraft on Delta from Atlanta to El Paso. Loved seating in the back. On one flight had a good conversation with the flight attendant and some soldiers going to Ft Bliss. Nice aircraft.
Beautiful airliner!Douglas and McDonnell Douglas favourites of mine.
Shame they have gone really....
What I find interesting is that off-lease MD-90 series aircraft are highly sought after.
Great things never go out of style.
This brings back memories I worked for McDonnell Douglas on the MD 80s and MD 90s as well as MD-11 is the one thing I remember about the MD 90s is they had a software problem with their flight control system where the aircraft would porpoise in-flight another words on commanded pictures in the elevator system I don’t know how many times I had to change elevator actuators on those things and if you noticed that’s a T tail So you had to work off an 80 foot boom lift not exactly the funnest of jobs to do in the wet weather also the fuel filters were difficult to access remember those engines were designed to be mounted under the wings not on the side of the fuselage oh well that was just me putting in my two cents God bless everyone who loves these aircraft as much as I did
Thanks for your story telling. Always interesting to have people with hand-on experience on the matter.
Excuse me, could I order some? (Just kidding, nice story. May the with you.)
Badmouths aircraft for a long, run-on paragraph, then thanks everyone for working on it.
Very quite plane to fly on if you were forward of the wings. Always enjoyed them. Loved the steep climbs.
Also for those who don’t know this is just me because I worked there as a mechanic but the main spotting features between the MT 90 and the MD 80 is on the MD 90 the top of the vertical stabilizer is more pronounced also on the MD 90 there are two windows between each over wing exit MD 80s only had one window over each over wing exit Anyways that’s just info in case anybody was interested once again thank you very much and God bless to you all
The MD-90s are much better and more beautiful than the A320s.
The A320 is practically a disposable airplane with its 56,000 hour life limit. At least 737 have a 75,000 hour limit, whereas Douglas twinjets never had any life limit and could fly forever if you don't mind the non-routines cropping up for the inevitable corrosion that everything suffers.
Much efficient than the A320s.
BXTS_CS You’re Wrong
Between those, MD-90 all the way, otherwise I'm a 737 guy.
That's wrong. Look which one outlived the other. I like both, but the A320 is more efficient and better
One thing I love about McDonnell Douglas was their aircraft introduction. I think since the DC-10-10, they revealed the aircraft to the world from the hangar with the aircraft powered by its own engines instead of having a tug tow it out. I think this shows that McDonnell Douglas was proud and confident that their aircraft was ready to fly on the very first day.
The General Electric CF6 series engines were among the quietest and most fuel efficient at the time.
Such a beautiful plane!
I think the MD-90 is the most attractive of the DC-9 family, mostly due to its longest length and largest engines. Just like an A340-600 is more attractive than A340-300, or DC-8 Super 70 looks better than any earlier DC-8. Long is beautiful!
(I doubt anyone ever called an A310, 747SP, 737-200/500/600, or A318/319 "beautiful"...)
This video has aged terribly and it's amazing. It's perfect
Damn, The MD-90 was such an amazing looking plane. It's a shame no one carried on this design. Bored of those crappy A320s everywhere.
Yes, thanks god to china and the new Comac ARJ21
I agree with you 100%
Haha, walmart series So true. Flying tin cans.
Lol the MD-90 has A320 engines xD
The A320 uses fuel as well. I'm talking about design.
The music is so 90's
The style is so 90's
This is the most 90's thing.
One of my favorite aircraft to fly on. Would love to see more in service. The 2 + 3 seating layout in economy is great.
@John Scott, the 2+3 seating layout was common in all McDonnell Douglas single-aisle airliners, except the DC-8 of course.
McDonell Douglas has to come back
박정후 Same! I wish that as-well
I could agree with you :-)
Aiden Bach it’s such a shame that MD went out of business as far as the commercial market is concerned. They made beautiful aircraft. Same for Lockheed.
Aiden Bach : I agree!! Miss the MD80 and MD90 and most of all my all time favorite, the MD11 and original model DC10‼️👍👍
@Aiden Bach. Absolutely. I’ve been on the MD-82 7 times and it was a great pleasure
Great to see this video. I love the style, the music, the way people dress, talk and act back then. What a great plane. A wonderful in these shortsighted, monotonousAirbus monoculture, esp. here in Europe.
First three minutes really gets me going. Great music & video for a great plane.
I really miss this company. I wish mcdonnell douglas come back like in the old days and start making the md-90 and md-11 again. Mcdonnells douglas aircraths are very special for me. This airplane are only. I love the two extra Windows it have in the cockpet.
Spacesynth intro with a classic star trek sample, love it 👍
My favorite out of all the MD series. They should have built more and just a tad bit bigger or longer.
We will have the COMAC :) ARJ21
The MD-90 should've stayed around longer
the soundtrack is absolutely wonderful. a garden of classic 90s ROMPler sounds - I hear some classic crap Roland JV / XV series brass, pounding Korg M1 house piano stabs in the first track, finished up with one of those perfectly bleak triumphant-ish "orchestral" pieces that every airplane documentary seems to have. wonderful upload thank you!
Who else watching this after the last MD-90 got retired?
its a hot aircraft. sleek and sexy. the MD 90 was an awesome plane during its reign. it still is an awesome plane
What a Beautiful Machine personally I, ve always loved the DC wich later became the MD 80 and now the MD 90 !! I can't understand why Mc Donald Douglas went out of Business but after all they build some Beautiful Airplane !! Personally I love the DC 9 Range and thanks for a lot of Safe Flights !!
They went out of business because they lacked innovation. After the late 1960's all they produced were derivative versions of aircraft. Boeing pretty much has gone down the same path since they merged with McDonnell Douglas in 1997. Whilst McDonnell Douglas produced good looking aircraft they were to a certain degree inferior to their competitors...
I love all of the McDonnell Douglas, Boeing and Lockheed promotional videos that you have posted. I have spent many hours watching your exceptional collection of videos and I hope to see more in the future. One question that I did have for you: Have you ever considered making a playlist of just promotional videos for each manufacturer? I would love to see any and all videos that you have for the L-1011 TriStar. My grandfather was one of tye engineers who designed the TriStar and I have always been fascinated by that aircraft. If you have any more Lockheed videos, I would sincerely appreciate it if you could post them in a dedicated playlist! :-)
Hi Peter, thanks so much for writing, and the good words! I actually have been playing around with various playlist ideas. I only built the "Airliner Promo Films" playlist about a month ago, and the entries are alphabetical. I will consider your idea, breaking it up into manufacture or airline. just not sure I have enough of 'em to warrant a playlist for each individual manufacture, but I will certainly consider it. I will have a dilemma when/if "More Classic Jetliners" fills up, because obviously, I can't call a playlist, "Even More Classic Jetliners", LOL. I suppose it should be "Classic Jetliners 1", "Classic Jetliners 2", etc, or broken down by aircraft or airline type, but on some vids, there are multiple types and airlines featured. But I'll think on this, for sure. You Tube allows 200 vids per playlist, then you have to start a new one, or "Part 2", as it were.
Classic Airliners & Vintage Pop Culture Thanks for replying to my message so fast...I wasn't expecting to hear back so soon!
As I mentioned previously, I would be thrilled to see more L-1011 stuff....it wasn't until after my grandfather died that I learned about his work with the L-1011 TriStar and all of the engineering and technology that went into what became a truly supreme aircraft. In any case...please don't hesitate to contact me should you happen to come across any further Lockheed videos! Best Regards;
Peter
I've got a family history with the L-1011 also, just an incredible bird, vastly superior to the DC-10, which I loved to fly in also. If only Lockheed could have gone with a small 100-120 seater to compete with the DC-9 and 737 to supplement the sales of the L-1011, providing the steady flow of $$$ needed to keep developing larger transports. In Boeings case it was the 727 that paid the way for the 747 program and later the 737.
The downside to MD 90 is row 39 has no window😡
Hi, would love to see the MD-95 film, thank you for thinking of me.
I like how they used to flare more than now days
Sound track is 👍 👌 👍
Another thing that brings back memories to open up the engines on an empty 90 you needed a pump to open up the trust reverser cores MD-80s We’re so much easier to forward lower cowling was just hand latches the aft lower County you used to 3/8 drive wobble socket thanks for this video brings back memories it’s been over 20 years since I worked on one of these funny how some of that stuff comes back I could probably go on forever but I don’t want to bore you people once again thank you for listening to my comments
I still believe that someone will look back at this project and redesign it as a new aircraft 🙂
I miss MD-90 4:57
So retro!! I never knew the MD-90 had the same engines as the A320 (IAE V2500s)!
Yes all our Aegean Air A320 have this engines as well with last MD9x production
@Kaitlyn Olson, the MD-90 continued the design legacy of the DC-9 and later MD-80.
I miss the MD-90 and Mcdonelldouglas
Those tail-engines are awesome! It just makes sense.... keep noise back, weight back, and weight off the wings
@WC3POchannel10A, Delta now also flies the Boeing 717, formerly the MD-95.
That music is the most stuffy corporate 90s cringe I've ever heard in my life
Absolute best
What an aircraft and the video is so 90's i was 12 when this promo video was made wow memories
Great vid, one of my favourite aircraft.
And the music is lit AF too.
actually, there was not any MD-90 flying
0:18 is so amazing, Boeing doesn't stand a chance! Oh wait...
Let's face it, the MD90 is the airplane that they ought to have brought to market in 1979. Instead, while everyone else was switching to high-bypass turbofans, MacDac opted to stick to leaky turbojets.
Todd Burleson I don't think you understand what the term "leaky turbojet" means. It's pejorative slang for a low-bypass turbofan.
Todd Burleson And if you want to split hairs, the GTCP85 is most definitely not a turbofan - and every DC-9 has one.
ErickC Not to also split hairs but the GTCP85 is a gas turbine. So Todd Burleson statement that the DC-9 never had turbojets is correct.
You're right, of course, under the regs it's not a turbojet as it doesn't use the gas flow to provide usable thrust. I'm going to assume that when I wrote that, I was in the middle of a brain fart or a beer (possibly both).
Although, it should be added that the turbofan is technically defined by the FAA as a subclass of turbojet, albeit with a bypass duct. Aren't the regulatory agencies fun? ;)
All in good fun, of course!
Md-90 is the best twinjet
Really a pretty aircraft and gorgeous design.
The best design of airliner ever made. Sinve MD-90-40 was never built.
Another Gem! thank you. I don't think anyone minds the videos of the newer jets
Loved the MD80/90 better than any 737
The DC-9s/MD-80s were favourites of SAS (Scandinavian Airlines) back in the days. I flew quite a few trips on those.
Another great aircraft. This and the Boeing 727 are my favourite. I would always request a seat by the engines when i flew one of those. Noting like the intense roar of the engine a few feet from my ears. Sweet music and some great memories. The music and footage make that aircraft look so damn sexy.
I grew up near Rochester New York. The DC-9s MD-80s Boeing 727s were the main birds at the airport back in the days of old...Now it's CRJ-700s CRJ-900s E-175s, E-190s and sometimes an A320 or a Boeing 737 might show up.
You forgot about the Allegheny BAC 1-11s flying to Rochester. Later bought by USAIR, they looked a lot like a DC-9 except no eyebrow windows on the cockpit. Loved all those planes.
The CRJ is similar in design to the DC-9/MD-80/MD-90/B717; it has the engines in the rear of the fuselage.
1:13 God those engines are huge from this angle!
Big Thanks for this upload!!!
Awesome vid! Nostalgic for the cheesy 80s/90s music! :)
I traveled once on board the MD 90, in winter , it was a scary trip in stormy weather especially when I noticed it's strange tiny wings, it recalled me the widows maker Starfighter 101, I said never again.....
Music you can dance to....Let's do the McDonnell Douglas shuffle lol
+erik riggs Yea! Woop it Douglas style!
A great Airplane that would have gone on selling for many years if MD had not sold out to Boeing , who sadly ended production after a small vertion called the Boeing 717 was made for a short time, I believe the MD 80 & 90 has given long service to Delta and many other Airlines of the World. Planeman 789 Jersey.C.I.
The 717 is not related to the MD90 in any way except for a common lineage to the original DC-9. The 717 is based off the basic DC-9 (being about the size of a DC-9-41) while the MD90 is based on the later DC-9-80 series (which has an extended wing and horizontal stabilizer). The 717/MD95 borrows the vertical stabilizer and tailcone from the MD87, but that's about it.
Boeing did in fact market the 717/MD95 heavily, but it was a decade or so ahead of its market (interestingly enough, the few that were produced are in high demand now).
The music of our time may have changed, but the beauty of this aircraft and its design have not.
Did I just see a touchscreen thing inside the plane?
Time Traveler evidence?
Isaac Babb Touchscreens were a thing in the 90s; they were just a special-purpose, niche product
@@Appleboy78165 Still VERY rare to see a small LCD color touch screen even as late as the mid 2000s...
that must have cost a fortune at the time.
We had touchscreens in the 1980's, see the HP-150 computer for example. People thought it was more intuitive and natural, but turns out holding your hand in front of the screen for long periods sucks and the mouse won.
Wow! As a huge MD-90 fan I say what a great find! Thanks. :-) Delta heralded this aircraft as its plane for the 21st Century in 1992. McDonnell Douglas did not make it into the 21st Century, but the MD-90 flies on, a testament to the aircraft and its maker.
Most 90’s music to ever exist, very nice plane though.
try this www.universalproductionmusic.com/en-gb/search?q=12717_607&qtext=Name%20Dropper&vtag=1&vwave=1&vdesc=1&ktype=1
I think boeing still has the design for the 717. If they wanted to break into the regional market, they could make a 4th generation of this airframe.
Shame on Boeing for killing this aircraft
This is a genuine piece of art. The Mad Dogs
Best music EVER!
McDonnell Douglas had nice looking planes, but the MD-90 was technological inferior to the A320 which came out 7 years earlier
Love the music.
The music is so 1990's, then all of a sudden in goes 1980's!
i miss this plane :(
Can we go back in time just a few years. Things seemed better, trippier and more 80’s back in the 90’s!😁😛
Please keep 'em coming!
The soundtrack is about as early-90s as one can get.
ua-cam.com/video/9ivJBYF_HTw/v-deo.html
My first flight ever was in 2004-05 on American Airlines. The pamphlets in the back of the seats said "Super 80". I wonder if I was flying on an MD-80 or an MD-90. Same thing honestly. I hate flying and will never do it again. But I will always have a special place for the Mad Dogg.
*extends gear at 20K feet*
Best job I ever had! ~ I sure miss McDonnell Douglas, we should've never sold out to Boeing!
They still exist as a Boeing With Douglas Logo
Music is perfect just like that plane.
It would be intresting if boeing raised the landing gear, elonginated the fuselage, and with new engines made an economical 4th generation of the DC-9. They would really have to add some redundencies for that jackscrew though probably.
Very modern for the epoch. $$$
New:
-Touchscreen
-V2500IAE engines
What's the difference between the MD-90 and a 717?
717 is about 110 seats while the MD-90 is 150-160
carnyboy04 The 717 is actually the MD95 a md project released by Boeing in 1998 it is a modified and modernized DC9-30 they have RR BR715 engines instead of PW engines and has a range of 3815 KM for the 717-200 hight gross weight.
Size
Thank you love the videos what a beautiful plane
0:49 is that real touch screen??
Has anyone else noticed that rear engined planes cane under wing engined ones in the looks department.
This is a very cool plane. The pilots love them because it's all mechanical. I love them cuz they are quiet. I fly in business class and it dam near feels like a glider. The engines are way way way the hell back there. lol
0:03 to 3:03 what soundtrack is that one ?
Hi, says, "De Wolfe Music Library-Stadium House-De Wolfe Music"
Classic Airliners & Vintage Pop Culture Thanks Buddy, i like that music.
A very horrible one and annoying
"Historians would later note that McDonnell Douglas' failure to adapt the music in its promo films to the post-1980s world would ultimately lead to the company's untimely demise."
I think it's not bad at all. It's kine of EDM-emey, but not dub-step in it, thanks goodness. I quite like the track.
Beautiful airplane 😉😉👍👍👍
Thanks for sharing... 😍
this was cool vid with some great shots and uber 90s one of my fav and sexiest planes flew a DL one recently from wilmington to atlanta pretty comfy i thought loved the sound honestly better than the RJ 200 from ATL to san antonio IMHO i will miss the whole series from the diesel 9 to the angry puppy
Such a beatifull plane. Shame Mcdonell douglas has gone forever and Boeing didnt continue the MD-11 and MD80 with more technology, new engines, new avionics, extended range, low emisions. Making a flying whale pointlees, bigger than a 747 or a 777 has no sense. Embraer has taken all the market fro regional Jets with quality and of course good prices and low manteniance. But MD90 was the perfect warrior for this market, with the experience of MANY decades of building planes, with erros, like every manufacturers, error that are not likely to happen again making this airframes top reliable and dependable.
Boeing had no reason to continue the MD11 and MD80/90 series when they had the 737 747 and on top of that the 777 at the time on the way
I know, just a wish.
38911bytefree Same, My father actually worked on the MD-11. I once read though that the aircraft wasn't all that fuel efficient and it was cheaper to operate a different aircraft like a 777, 767, or A330
We will have the COMAC ARJ21, Hopefully a brand new MD ... built in china
Juan Gil xD
Meh, I'm not a big fan of rip off aircraft...
Engines mounted in the Rear of these MD planes are notorious for ingesting Ice
Touch screen in 1994?????? Wow :o
The MD-90 could have been a real winner if it was built with a larger faster wing. I wished the super strech MD-90-40 was built, it would have been a cool plane.
If they had come out with this jet in 1988 and added some winglets, we may have had MD jets around today.
Though really they should have added the cfm56 to the original md80 as they came about in the mid 70s.