Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711/1A-010 Luxury Watch Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 93

  • @ajaxforever5473
    @ajaxforever5473 7 років тому +82

    This is such a fantastic timepiece. For me it is absolutely impossible to ever own one but whoww.... just looking at it and admiring the watch is like admiring an incredible piece of art. That is also what i love about timepieces cheap or expensive, admiring other people's watch and talk about it. It is a great hobby.

    • @bubu-tk2sb
      @bubu-tk2sb 6 років тому +2

      AjaxForever you such a true watches enthusiasm, I agreed with you bout the cheap of expensive watches, some cheap watch does deserve it own unique too,

    • @CroElectroStile
      @CroElectroStile 6 років тому +4

      buy a replica for 500$

    • @412JFury
      @412JFury 6 років тому +2

      Buy a steel Bagelsport Nautilus
      ... I received mine Today and it is stunning.

    • @MagnumSkyWolf
      @MagnumSkyWolf 6 років тому +2

      500 lol you can get them for 83 dollars perfect replica

    • @workonlyaf8194
      @workonlyaf8194 6 років тому

      Patek and audemars in stock super replica that has the same movement and thickness just like the original !!! WhatsApp only +447553627863 TRUSTED WORLDWIDE SHIP WORLDWIDE

  • @theonlyredspecial
    @theonlyredspecial 7 років тому +13

    Very pretty yet understated. Ive owned a nautilus in the past and loved it, but it was a little small on my wrist, as are most patek watches. This is a very versatile piece however and easily fits under any shirt.

  • @camerongupta6994
    @camerongupta6994 7 років тому +11

    $37,500 😩 still best sports watch ever made. Great review Tim!

    • @MadMan-cp6tn
      @MadMan-cp6tn 7 років тому +6

      But looks more like 3.750...

    • @MadMan-cp6tn
      @MadMan-cp6tn 7 років тому +3

      Haha, obviously you dont know me ;)

    • @Longboardmaestro
      @Longboardmaestro 7 років тому +3

      I don't understand why is this a sports watch ? A sports watch is eg. G shock

    • @ZurriyetBlogs
      @ZurriyetBlogs 6 років тому

      25.000 usd

    • @RICHFRVR
      @RICHFRVR 3 роки тому +1

      Man I wish it was still 37500 lmao

  • @leedixon3945
    @leedixon3945 3 роки тому +1

    Greta review to the point without a million adverts thanks Tim

  • @scottlalonde2878
    @scottlalonde2878 4 роки тому +1

    Nice review from a couple years ago, thank you Tim. Agree a man (or lady) could have this as one watch. Personally I'd want a watch with a rotating bezel.

  • @rayleeaustralia
    @rayleeaustralia 6 років тому +6

    Absolutely a gem! Love it

  • @uleertel
    @uleertel 7 років тому +10

    Great review, and I love Patek, and I know there was the recent event in NY but I feel there is a bit too much Patek on this channel lately or am I the only one?

    • @vezinam58
      @vezinam58 7 років тому +2

      Me too!

    • @StaBuon
      @StaBuon 5 років тому +1

      There isn't enough Patek! Give us more 5146, 5136 and 5036 with metal bracelets!

  • @BrixtonBando
    @BrixtonBando 7 років тому +5

    I had never seen 1 in person. So when I ordered and got 1. I have to admit I was underwhelmed. So my next watch will be a 5726 or something with a it more going on. Great review tho.

  • @BenTramer
    @BenTramer 5 років тому

    The Nautilus is my favorite integrated bracelet stainless steel sports but it's so dated: friction fit clasp with clamshell (no double deployant), pins and sleeves, ~40 hour power reserve. I'll give them credit for the updates of silicon hairspring and ceramic bearings.

  • @josephfelaco8495
    @josephfelaco8495 7 років тому +3

    Is it the grey dial you have in this video? I can't decide weather to get blue or grey

    • @tejajonas
      @tejajonas 6 років тому +4

      Joseph Felaco blue

    • @deano3206
      @deano3206 5 років тому

      Agreed. No other colour will do.

    • @ugaais
      @ugaais 3 роки тому

      Blue

  • @FABM27
    @FABM27 6 років тому +22

    I should have bought this watch instead of my car. Only if i could go back in time 😒

    • @-Medici
      @-Medici 4 роки тому +1

      Should have bought a delorean.

    • @yapolloable
      @yapolloable 4 роки тому +1

      cars= go down in value over time. This bebby goes up but it doesn't bring you to places

  • @sabre720
    @sabre720 6 років тому +6

    This watch has always reminded me of my casio A158WA-1.

    • @the1916companywatchreviews
      @the1916companywatchreviews  6 років тому +1

      Glad this watch brought back memories!
      Thanks for watching!
      - WatchBox Team

    • @Koru-Health
      @Koru-Health 5 років тому

      It is well know that Genta's inspiration for the Nautilus was Casio. Unfortunately Patek has never been able to match Casio's historic financial prominence.

    • @ugaais
      @ugaais 3 роки тому

      @@Koru-Health lol

  • @willh4334
    @willh4334 5 років тому

    I have 1. 1675 gmt mkv dial full set 2.VC overseas 3. 116600ln submariner 4. the new datejust 5. 116519ln daytona 6. universal geneve tri-compax * 2 7. 1949 universal geneve *1 8. AP 14790 tropical dial 9.soviet rocketa And if I need one watch, one watch that will put a full stop to my entire watch collection and accompany all the way till the end. This will be it, the PP 5711. And if I die the second day or the 36000 days(preferably) I got this watch, I can imagine wearing this watch, while my casket getting lower down the grave.

  • @tobbe1312
    @tobbe1312 5 років тому +2

    Classic & still beutiful

  • @jacc88888
    @jacc88888 7 років тому +2

    Wow - incredible watch. The level of finishing and detail to detail is extraordinary. Also how do Patek get a mechanical watch to be so accurate: +3/-2 seconds? That's an accuracy of 99.996%! No wonder most people would have to sell a kidney to afford one....

    • @coffeeboyclips1973
      @coffeeboyclips1973 6 років тому +3

      rolex watches are accurate to -2/+2 and are way cheaper, better built and way better looking than Patek

    • @sriicasm
      @sriicasm 5 років тому

      @@coffeeboyclips1973 No,it's not

    • @dlhussain81
      @dlhussain81 5 років тому

      jacc88888 sadly in real life neither Rolexes or Pateks live up to these claims. Then again I never buy them for their accuracy 🤷‍♂️

    • @vika0194
      @vika0194 2 роки тому

      You do realise watches under 200 dollars also have accuraccy that good?

    • @jacc88888
      @jacc88888 2 роки тому

      @@vika0194 Haha! Yes, but I don’t think you can get a mechanical watch certified to that accuracy under $200. That said , my gushing comment was made about 4 years ago and I’m a little bit more clued up now. The nautilus is certainly obscenely overpriced.

  • @bubu-tk2sb
    @bubu-tk2sb 6 років тому

    I would expected patek to be 50 times better than a Rolex in finishing quality, but I still could see some not that perfection with naked eyes, patek a great, but not those tech who's claimed to be trained on their finishing quality control.

  • @hongloannguyen2305
    @hongloannguyen2305 4 роки тому

    Looking like an dress watch,not sport,but amazing

  • @amsarg
    @amsarg 7 років тому +9

    The royal oak looks much better in my opionion.

  • @tynchytemper9618
    @tynchytemper9618 4 роки тому

    What type of steel is used here please?

  • @Ivancic05
    @Ivancic05 5 років тому

    Can someone help me my Patek stopped while I was sleeping and when I put it on, the watch worked but it was 8am and the watch showed that it was 12 am

    • @Thripphy
      @Thripphy 5 років тому

      Drake 78 Automatic movement, it sounds kinda lame but you always have to set it right again if it doesnt have a power reserve. So after you wake up, its normal when you have a wrong time on it. Just reset it. My Explorer II has a power reserve of 48h. You may read your instructions guide

  • @ugaais
    @ugaais 3 роки тому

    Vacheron Overseas 2nd generation blows this away

  • @c92k54
    @c92k54 3 роки тому +1

    It’s a shame they discontinued this model with the blue dial

  • @Apollonius12
    @Apollonius12 7 років тому +3

    stunning

  • @mathieub6192
    @mathieub6192 7 років тому +3

    I feel the design of the nautilus, compared to other historic sportswatches, looks a bit dated.

  • @Agrippa31BC
    @Agrippa31BC 5 років тому +2

    Unidirectional winding, no hacking, and not all that special. I’ll take my Rolexes over this 100% of the time.

    • @CommandoMaster
      @CommandoMaster 5 років тому +1

      85k CAD overpriced WOW!

    • @balthus9265
      @balthus9265 4 роки тому

      Absolutely agree. The hype is all about the design and brand. I’d choose my Explorer over it easily.

  • @sen795
    @sen795 6 років тому +3

    this sneaky guy always presses the watch hard on his wrist to make it look thinner

  • @wolper2155
    @wolper2155 4 роки тому

    Only three words, expansive, rare and old-fashonied like a Tv Screen from the 70th

  • @mauriciomonge5349
    @mauriciomonge5349 4 роки тому

    Beautifoul and excellent watch. But gen on a waitiling list between the 8 and 12 years, they are so many brands hight watchmaking for example Vacheron Constantin and Audemars Piguet does not go with me if people want please them it seems to like foolish NONSENSE.

  • @FreeNelsonMandelaNow
    @FreeNelsonMandelaNow 6 років тому +5

    I just can't help it, but I don't like the design. To me, it looks obviously dated. But not in any sense "vintage" or "modern" or "retro" or "classic". It's looks like it's from the 1970's. It would be improved if they removed the ears. With them I can't help but think it evokes some clunky 1970's era mass market consumer product like a rotary knob cathode ray television set or a Hoover vacuum. I guess I just don't like the 1970's design aesthetic.

  • @dimitrisbastas739
    @dimitrisbastas739 7 років тому +4

    If l would be shipowner... 27.000€ for a simple function stainless steel watch...

  • @trumpetdudekjk
    @trumpetdudekjk 5 років тому +2

    I'd rather have a rolex for everyday of the week

  • @vezinam58
    @vezinam58 7 років тому +4

    Patek Philippe are among the finest timepieces in the world for sure, but we are getting "Overdosed" with Patek. Please don't forget about Rolex.

  • @traeucity6087
    @traeucity6087 5 років тому +2

    The emperor has no clothes.

  • @billymania11
    @billymania11 4 роки тому +1

    The Rolex guys are amusing. The Nautilus is superior and looks the business. True the Subs own the rap video side of things.

  • @KyleDavisMusic
    @KyleDavisMusic 7 років тому +3

    #wewantfederico

  • @MadMan-cp6tn
    @MadMan-cp6tn 7 років тому +2

    5711 for a 14cm wrist??? LOL

  • @precieuxphenomene
    @precieuxphenomene 3 роки тому

    💙💙💙🏆📈🔥

  • @serendra90210
    @serendra90210 5 років тому +1

    It's too retro looking for my taste 🤨

  • @torontowatches9709
    @torontowatches9709 4 роки тому

    That clasp is absolute hot garbage, and the bracelet held together by pins LOLLL, People are paying 70K for this watch you have to be out of your mind even if you can afford it.
    Royal Oak is miles better and its the original watch designed by Genta for MEN, 25K and easy to find, this he designed for women and I CAN See how. Even the great Tim Mosso can't oversell this watch.

  • @mvrdamonxy7942
    @mvrdamonxy7942 6 років тому +3

    Thats a womans watch the man who invented it said him self it was for ladies.

  • @jjlad5037
    @jjlad5037 7 років тому +5

    I find it looks feminine.

  • @erikdewilde7404
    @erikdewilde7404 7 років тому +6

    Tooooo expensive man and I am not a fan of this brand. He just want to sell his stuff on his website that is all.

    • @blocc9082
      @blocc9082 6 років тому +2

      Erik De Wilde good you liked your own comment cuz no one else will

  • @mikehendrix5473
    @mikehendrix5473 6 років тому +2

    I dont get patek they are vastly overpriced and most of them are shit looking