Powertank VS ARB onboard air

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @ZachBrimhall
    @ZachBrimhall 3 роки тому +5

    Video starts at 4:30. I'd never pay $600 for a Co2 tank.

  • @stephanecorriveau6982
    @stephanecorriveau6982 4 роки тому +5

    Holy over-produced video Batman! 2 minutes of information in 11 minutes.

  • @co3506
    @co3506 4 роки тому +1

    Is there a video on Matt's set up he uses in this video? I could not find his channel.

  • @theorientalknight
    @theorientalknight 4 роки тому +3

    It’s $600+ for a CO2 tank w/ syphon tube in it. Really?!

  • @AdventureBuilt
    @AdventureBuilt 4 роки тому

    Subscribed. Great content and production. Keep up the good work!!!

  • @oscrm1760
    @oscrm1760 3 роки тому

    You have some video of how to install the spod and next to the compressor arb

  • @nullernullson6749
    @nullernullson6749 5 років тому +3

    Your speed "advantage" of the power tank doesn't take into consideration or disclose the extra time and cost you incur to go and get the tank filled... You save some time initially filling up tires only to have to waste it at some point in the future. Great deal...
    Remember - "Time is precious"
    An on board compressor is unlimited air, you spend no additional time or additional money (which you spent time to earn) to keep your air supply going. Plus, you don't even think about how much air is left in the tank.
    A York 210 engine driven on board air setup would be a far better contender... Way faster, quieter, and more reliable than that ARB junk.
    But I don't see that mentioned in the video....
    Electric 12V compressors suck.
    How about using air for general utility? Air tools, blowing things off/cleaning surfaces?
    Are you going to want to waste the air in your "Powertank" to do these tasks due to the aforementioned penalty of having to go get it filled? You can easily blow through a lot of air doing those tasks.

  • @jasonbroom
    @jasonbroom 2 роки тому +2

    Four and a half minutes of BS before actually getting to the content. Useless.

  • @1chrisahughes
    @1chrisahughes 5 років тому +1

    I dig what you're doing. Nice video. But you may want to do some investigation on Patagonia. They are actively trying to keep motorized vehicles off of PUBLIC lands. They are working AGAINST the wheeling community.

    • @WarPigOffroad
      @WarPigOffroad  5 років тому

      Chris Hughes dang it that’s my new hat also lol.

    • @1chrisahughes
      @1chrisahughes 5 років тому

      @@WarPigOffroad Sorry man. I see this quite often. People supporting companies who don't support us. :(

    • @greghobson6054
      @greghobson6054 5 років тому +1

      Better re-read. Patagonia is in full support of keeping land open, for hunter, motorcycles, cyclists, and OHV vehicles.

    • @1chrisahughes
      @1chrisahughes 5 років тому

      @@greghobson6054 This has been debated for years. I just spent an hour researching. I found ZERO support for motorized recreation. To be fair and honest, I only found anecdotal evidence to the contrary. So that leaves us to form our own conclusions. If they are supporting motorized recreation I can't find any mention of it. None.

    • @jeffshultz5348
      @jeffshultz5348 4 роки тому +2

      Nothing wrong with Patagonia. Yeah they might be against some wheeling places. But I dont want a Jeep everywhere I go. Here in Oregon we have a shitload of wheeling and conservation areas. You can have it both ways.