Two months for three years of abuse? Absolutely ludicrous. If the teacher had been a man, there's no way the sentence would've been that low. Pleased to see it called what it is, though. It's every bit as much abuse as if it'd had been done by a man. And a child is a child regardless of gender.
Explain why you care without resorting to platitudes about "protecting our children!" I see an attractive woman having an affair with a sexually mature male.
A woman having sex with a sexually mature man is "disturbing!!!" Why? Because "If the sexes were reversed, it wouldn't be the same!" The fact that you have to imagine the sexes being reversed to see this as wrong is proof that it really isn't all that wrong to begin with. "Imagine if she also killed him and had sex with his corpse!" Well, that would be bad, but it has zero bearing on reality.
Twenty years is a ridiculously long sentence. Sure, the teenager was young, but how "traumatic" was it? I would say a year is long enough for the "crime." We tend to go nuts when a "crime" involves sex. The final sentence was not quite appropriate, but the general population is a mob of witch burners in need of a target. The Constitution states that the punishment should fit the crime. While these douchebags get so excited about the 2nd Amendment, they tend to shrug off infractions against all of the other amendments, and the 8th Amendment is the one most ignored. Think about this. How much force was actually used? He didn't enjoy it at all? Is it right, what she did? No. But, really, ask any boy, and they'd have gladly been a willing "victim" of this sort of "crime." We just simply can't have teachers doing this sort of thing. And I'm also against the sexual offender list, and putting anyone on it for this sort of offense. This is not something she's likely to ever do again. It's not like she displayed a pattern. ______________________________
The kinds of comments left on these videos is normie virtue signaling 101. "If that was my son, I'd slowly dip her in acid until all of her skin melted off, then I would throw salt on her exposed muscles, then I would feed her to a bunch of hungry dogs!" They are people without any semblance of morality, but who jump at the first opportunity to show how big their hearts are when stories emerge about children being mistreated. I guarantee none of the people here actually think the woman having sex with this young man is evil. None of them are disgusted. None of them are outraged. It's all performative empathy. Sociopaths...
@@justinharrold101: No, it doesn't. That's the sort of accusation you snowflakes like to make to discourage any sort of reasonable debate over this topic. The whole thing just gives you the vapors, and you can't think clearly. Read closely what I said. This time, try it without moving your lips.
Two months for three years of abuse? Absolutely ludicrous. If the teacher had been a man, there's no way the sentence would've been that low.
Pleased to see it called what it is, though. It's every bit as much abuse as if it'd had been done by a man. And a child is a child regardless of gender.
She should have had to serve at least ten years in prison. And register as a sexual predator. Never be allowed around children again.
Explain why you care without resorting to platitudes about "protecting our children!" I see an attractive woman having an affair with a sexually mature male.
So it's ok for a female to SA and get next to no punishment. She even moved to his bldg that's really disturbing!!!
A woman having sex with a sexually mature man is "disturbing!!!"
Why? Because "If the sexes were reversed, it wouldn't be the same!"
The fact that you have to imagine the sexes being reversed to see this as wrong is proof that it really isn't all that wrong to begin with. "Imagine if she also killed him and had sex with his corpse!" Well, that would be bad, but it has zero bearing on reality.
She's gonna do it again
Twenty years is a ridiculously long sentence. Sure, the teenager was young, but how "traumatic" was it? I would say a year is long enough for the "crime." We tend to go nuts when a "crime" involves sex. The final sentence was not quite appropriate, but the general population is a mob of witch burners in need of a target. The Constitution states that the punishment should fit the crime. While these douchebags get so excited about the 2nd Amendment, they tend to shrug off infractions against all of the other amendments, and the 8th Amendment is the one most ignored. Think about this. How much force was actually used? He didn't enjoy it at all?
Is it right, what she did? No. But, really, ask any boy, and they'd have gladly been a willing "victim" of this sort of "crime." We just simply can't have teachers doing this sort of thing.
And I'm also against the sexual offender list, and putting anyone on it for this sort of offense. This is not something she's likely to ever do again. It's not like she displayed a pattern.
______________________________
The kinds of comments left on these videos is normie virtue signaling 101. "If that was my son, I'd slowly dip her in acid until all of her skin melted off, then I would throw salt on her exposed muscles, then I would feed her to a bunch of hungry dogs!"
They are people without any semblance of morality, but who jump at the first opportunity to show how big their hearts are when stories emerge about children being mistreated. I guarantee none of the people here actually think the woman having sex with this young man is evil. None of them are disgusted. None of them are outraged. It's all performative empathy. Sociopaths...
Sounds like you've shared her behavior.
@@justinharrold101: No, it doesn't. That's the sort of accusation you snowflakes like to make to discourage any sort of reasonable debate over this topic. The whole thing just gives you the vapors, and you can't think clearly. Read closely what I said. This time, try it without moving your lips.
60 days....???
Who got paid off?
How’d she get 60 days?
WTF 😒