Trying to explain SET (Set Equivalence Theory)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @SmartHobbies
    @SmartHobbies 3 роки тому +6

    Genuinely approachable explanation of SET. Thank you.

  • @keenannorton9012
    @keenannorton9012 3 роки тому +4

    this just blew my mind and i've solved relatively hard puzzles for 10+ years. very cool to see just how much complex ideas there are to learn about such a seemingly simple game.

  • @pacman52280
    @pacman52280 3 роки тому +6

    You should do more videos like this for other techniques. It would save you a lot of time when you are solving puzzles on this channel. Mark and Simon should do the same for CTC.

    • @StroSolves
      @StroSolves  3 роки тому +2

      That's what I'm planning to do. I'm thinking a video on wings (x, y, etc) and maybe some of the fish would be good. Possibly one on the 'law of leftovers' and the rule of 45 for killers.

  • @TomCee53
    @TomCee53 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks. Simon would save a LOT of time by referencing this video.

    • @StroSolves
      @StroSolves  3 роки тому +1

      Haha, well feel free to suggest that to him. ;)

  • @davidwiederman8841
    @davidwiederman8841 9 місяців тому

    Hey Scott, I enjoy your videos and appreciate this one explaining set so clearly. Do you know of any link or video or article etc that has every possible variant of set? I understand that many of them wouldn’t be useful, I’m curious to know what other “shapes” can be made.

  • @bry2048
    @bry2048 Рік тому

    Very nice explanation, hope you did more sudoku videos

  • @PjotrV
    @PjotrV 3 роки тому

    well explained Scott :) referring to this video will save you a lot of time in the future I would guess :D

    • @StroSolves
      @StroSolves  3 роки тому +2

      That's the hope. Also, I think it can be annoying to a viewer who already understands a concept to have several minutes of explaining the same thing yet again. I think there's sort of a tight rope you have to walk. You don't want to assume everyone knows everything and not explain stuff, but you also don't want to overexplain things that everyone already knows.

  • @gemsamee2599
    @gemsamee2599 Рік тому

    Could you please solve this sudoku named as everest by arto inkala. I have seen a russian guy on youtube solving this puzzle using the set technique.

  • @thoughtbyte
    @thoughtbyte 3 роки тому

    Well done explanations!

  • @diegobolso2005
    @diegobolso2005 2 роки тому +1

    A concrete example would shed some more light to the explanation, although it was really clear. Thanks for the video!

  • @TheSonicPerson
    @TheSonicPerson 3 роки тому

    did you call it Aad's Theorem because I called it that?

    • @StroSolves
      @StroSolves  3 роки тому

      I've seen a few people refer to it as that on the CTC discord, including you :)

  • @govindnayak6579
    @govindnayak6579 3 роки тому

    Thanks for this video please make a long video covering phistomefel ring theory all possible set thanks from ❤️ God bless you