Empty Rectangle and the LOGIC Behind It

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
  • Lesson #17: The Empty Rectangle appears more often than you would think, you just have to know how to look for it. In this video I explain the pattern first, and then show you two real Sudoku puzzles in progress to demonstrate this very useful pattern. I hope you enjoy this tutorial, and, I hope you Learn Something!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @tomdalziel4607
    @tomdalziel4607 8 місяців тому +3

    Thank you for taking the time to explain every step of the process so clearly!!! 😀💟

  • @a_son_of_light
    @a_son_of_light 2 місяці тому +7

    I was so stuck...all that was left in the puzzle were pairs, triplets, quads, quints, septs in every direction and within all blocks...nothing to eliminate! Also no x-wings, x-y wings, xyz wings, w-wings, and no skyscrapers that could eliminate any little number. Then I happened upon this video. Thank you so much for the perfect explanation....one empty rectangle solved the puzzle completely. I have to start always looking for empty rectangles in every puzzle I do so that I will always have it in my arsenal of techniques.

  • @jenschafer269
    @jenschafer269 4 місяці тому +1

    This helped me finish the NYT hard puzzle today!

  • @samantajansch1669
    @samantajansch1669 2 місяці тому

    Thank you so much for this long explanation, finally I got it! Greetings from Germany!

    • @a_son_of_light
      @a_son_of_light 2 місяці тому

      Problem is to remember to look for it the next time we're stuck! 😊😊

  • @eugenetswong
    @eugenetswong 5 місяців тому

    Thanks for this! I didn't use it specifically, but it didn't help. Using a conjugate pair like that makes a big difference.

  • @dunnetahl
    @dunnetahl 10 місяців тому

    Really aweome technique. Just used this with multiple numbers to solve a puzzle I had completed all pairs, triplets, then x wing, y wing, swordfish and slanted skyscrapper were all nil, but I had several key empty rectangles that helped me solve the puzzle. This technique is really easy to spot, understand and apply.

  • @wwfgumby
    @wwfgumby 9 місяців тому

    Well described, thanks.

  • @duffelesser6210
    @duffelesser6210 8 місяців тому

    Amazing! thx from germany!

  • @VistasdelMar2008
    @VistasdelMar2008 6 місяців тому

    In your last real world example, does the logic of eliminating the 2 in the 9th column also imply that the 2 in the same row immediately adjacent in column 7 also get eliminated ?

    • @aspartaami
      @aspartaami 5 місяців тому

      No, because it doesn't see the empty rectangle. Only the one seeing the empty rectangle can be eliminated.

  • @vidyanandsinha8879
    @vidyanandsinha8879 3 місяці тому

    Thanks

  • @Judith34816
    @Judith34816 2 місяці тому +2

    She stops explaining what is meant by "one row and one column" at 5:10.

  • @andremenard2933
    @andremenard2933 25 днів тому

    Videos way too long, she repeats too much

  • @thejose965
    @thejose965 7 місяців тому +8

    Great lucid explanation... Thanks a ton from Kuwait 🙏

  • @IBoughtTerrariaFor67p
    @IBoughtTerrariaFor67p 4 місяці тому +2

    Jesus you went on a bit

  • @nouraalwani1245
    @nouraalwani1245 5 місяців тому +1

    I think that your explanation for calling this method an empty rectangle is wrong.
    The empty rectangle refers to the area that consists of the block , the conjugate pair, and the cell that has the number that would be eliminated. When you connect all these they create a rectangle shape.

  • @charlottewebb3364
    @charlottewebb3364 9 місяців тому +2

    I Like your nuts and bolts approach in describing these patterns.
    You should write a book or make one available for download. It would be well worth the purchase.

  • @wegtennis8740
    @wegtennis8740 3 місяці тому +1

    In your last example, isn't there also an empty rectangle related to the 2's in block 9 that would lead to the elimination of 2 in the lower left corner of block 3 (cell 7)? This would then leave 2's in cells 3 and 9 of block 3, resulting in the same final result of eliminating the 2 in cell 6 of block 9? Would one of you smart folks let me know if I'm understanding the process? Thx

    • @noney81
      @noney81 7 днів тому

      Saw that too and think it works. With the empty rectangle in the video the 2 is restricted to column 7 in box 9 so that eliminates the 2 from box 3 in that column as well. Works both ways for both boxes.

  • @RealGrover
    @RealGrover Місяць тому +1

    The first example was at first very frustrating to me because I couldn’t find any use in the excluded 3. There‘s just no follow-up.
    But it made me look very closely until I managed to spot my very first xy wing 🎉🎉🎉 Hurray!
    There‘s one with the pivot in R3,C9, x in R3,C3 and y in R9,C9. It conveniently excludes the 2 in R9,C3 and the whole puzzle unravels easily, even disregarding the empty rectangle trick.
    So, while it was an underwhelming empty rectangle it would make an excellent example for a super helpful xy wing 😅 Thank you!

  • @TomJones-tx7pb
    @TomJones-tx7pb 4 місяці тому

    If you have a valid puzzle, you can switch rows with columns and produce another valid puzzle.
    If you have a valid puzzle you can switch 2 rows in the same block and produce another valid puzzle.
    Once you know these 2 concepts, you do not need to belabor all the different patterns for a solving technique.

  • @jaimeriquelme6727
    @jaimeriquelme6727 4 місяці тому

    Smart girl, thanks for your lesson and your time.

  • @thomaswilke6312
    @thomaswilke6312 7 місяців тому

    Very clear and concise explanation. Thank you very much

  • @freshfreenlovinit
    @freshfreenlovinit Місяць тому

    This lady is a born teacher.

  • @kyldare
    @kyldare 10 місяців тому

    I'm having a hard time figuring out which number is considered to be in the same row/column. As an example, why couldnt the 2 on h9 be considered the one on the same column then removing the 2 from C6 instead? For the example on 12:53

    • @Jake_Cotumaccio
      @Jake_Cotumaccio 7 місяців тому

      If you start by choosing the 2 on H9, you’d need there to be only one other 2 in row 9. This is what she means by “conjugate pair”- there’s only two instances of a given digit (2 in this case) in a particular row or column. However, because there are more than two 2s in row H, you can’t use the 2 on H9 as the basis for the empty rectangle trick.
      You can use the 2 in column 6 because there are only two 2s in that column, meaning it is part of a conjugate pair.
      Hope that helps!

  • @kaskazimnoch9583
    @kaskazimnoch9583 6 місяців тому

    You're the best.

  • @yolotaylor993
    @yolotaylor993 7 місяців тому

    Very clear, thanks

  • @seemashrivastava1661
    @seemashrivastava1661 Рік тому

    Is it necessary that the conjugate pair should be in different blocks,Or they can be in same block?

    • @macfid
      @macfid 10 місяців тому +2

      Go to 6:40

    • @zattopekk
      @zattopekk 2 місяці тому

      A pair (same numbers!) in ONE block?????

  • @billgillaspey9036
    @billgillaspey9036 Рік тому

    I'm really enjoying your Sudoku videos; thank you for them.
    Question: who determines--and/or HOW do they determine--whether a puzzle is hard or "easy". I'm assuming that the number of slots out of 81 slots which are blank is one factor. But what else: is it part of the algorithm that generates these puzzles? Is there Sudoku "checker" that rates them (like a restaurant reviewer...) . Always wondered....