War Thunder - HOW will the SOVIET TECH TREE (Air) look like in the FUTURE? FLANKERS? Su-24's? Su-57?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 чер 2024
  • Talking about the Soviet Tech tree and the FUTURE of it!
    Timecodes:
    00:00 - Future of the Soviet tech tree!
    00:45 - Rank 5
    01:44 - Rank 6
    05:02 - Rank 7
    09:02 - Rank 8
    Join our Discord: / discord
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @matawg
    Patreon: / matawg
    Ajude o canal com o PIX de qualquer valor: matawg@hotmail.com
    Donate with Paypal: www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted... My Secondary GTA Channel: / @thatmatt-kq9uu
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 393

  • @mab2187
    @mab2187 10 місяців тому +316

    Don't forget the Su-37 and 47, they might have been only tech demonstrators but they would've used the latest and greatest weapons during their times. R60M, 73s, 77, 27ET/ERs etc etc bombs, AGMs, and they were mounted with 30mm cannons. I'd like to see them and use them, they are my loves!

    • @raygunreagan2274
      @raygunreagan2274 10 місяців тому +11

      Go play ace combat 7 then they’re in that game the su47 and su37 shouldn’t be added even the yak141 shouldn’t have been added

    • @mab2187
      @mab2187 10 місяців тому +47

      @@raygunreagan2274 been there done that, now I want in them in War Thunder and chances are very high they will come in due time. People will pay its a fact. And the game is now finished with pure historical BS. Its now gonna need to start bringing more proto, and half built and blue print vehicles. Besides that is the inevitable.

    • @thiagorocha5133
      @thiagorocha5133 10 місяців тому +30

      @@raygunreagan2274 Warthunder is that kind of game that only generates hype with the addition of new stuff every update. At some point Gaijin will be forced to add those proto/tech demonstrators aircraft, like the mirage 4000, f16xl, 15 stol/mtd, su37, su47, yf23 and others

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 10 місяців тому +18

      One sad thing about SU-47 is that it may end up being an CRAFTING EVENT vehicle

    • @thiagorocha5133
      @thiagorocha5133 10 місяців тому +6

      @@kajmak64bit76 Yeah, same for the yf23 if it comes to the game and other prototypes or tec demonstrators (su37 terminator, f16xl, and others). Anyway, i think those iconic aircrafts deserve to be added

  • @Peter-ox7wh
    @Peter-ox7wh 10 місяців тому +133

    Su-27 and so on are huge aircraft, would be interesting to see how they compared to the others.

    • @bigmemer4398
      @bigmemer4398 10 місяців тому +6

      We already have f-14 which is big

    • @thesupreme8062
      @thesupreme8062 10 місяців тому +20

      @@bigmemer4398 the is su 27 massive

    • @eze3922
      @eze3922 10 місяців тому +2

      @@thesupreme8062 f14 is bigger

    • @thesupreme8062
      @thesupreme8062 10 місяців тому +5

      @@eze3922 its slightly bigger but its faster and a twin seat, and the comparison is bad, the su 33 is bigger than an f14 and its also carrier capable

    • @JSON689
      @JSON689 10 місяців тому +1

      I doubt there will be Mig25. That thing cant really turn and I dont think there will be hypersonic missles so it will be basically useless

  • @atomicvortex6071
    @atomicvortex6071 10 місяців тому +37

    damn the grind is gonna be crazy even if only half of these planes come out

    • @braedynhoward3644
      @braedynhoward3644 10 місяців тому +4

      For sure... but hopefully the economy changes will soften the blow a bit XD

    • @Korxion
      @Korxion 10 місяців тому +2

      I think there should be a part 2 of a tech tree. For example tier 9 would be locked until the rest of the tech tree is done, then to make the grind easier, some of the first rank 9 would be a lot cheaper in rp, comparable to rank 5 or maybe 6. Or they could just make the rp go barely go up and a huge jump in rp multiplier

  • @simon_figas1699
    @simon_figas1699 10 місяців тому +19

    Just missing the Su-47 as an event vehicle on rank 7

  • @Marxist1917
    @Marxist1917 10 місяців тому +8

    Su-30 and Su-27 forever in my heart😊

  • @alb9229
    @alb9229 10 місяців тому +37

    There is a huge gap between the 29M (9.15) and the 35 . Since you went for the SMT ( which incorporates most of the upgrades of the 9.15 ) as a followup to the 29S i believe the 29M 9.25 or 9.61 would be more appropriate as a step towards the 35.

  • @McMissile3612
    @McMissile3612 10 місяців тому +10

    This tech tree would be a dream come true.

  • @departmentoftheeruseanroya9106
    @departmentoftheeruseanroya9106 10 місяців тому +71

    Will you do a video like this for all countries in game? I think it’s a neat idea.
    EDIT: Okay you already did, but what about ground and maybe Naval?

    • @FallIntoPeace
      @FallIntoPeace 10 місяців тому +7

      He alr did that for almost every country

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 10 місяців тому +6

      Yup! The only nations left to do are Sweden and America, then we'll move onto ground trees and more videos about nations that can come! Not where they'll go as a subtree or arguing for whether they should be a full tree in themselves, just sharing what vehicles different nations have!

    • @mlaczu8088
      @mlaczu8088 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@lazylime8046 when can we expect the swedish and american tech trees?

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 10 місяців тому +3

      @@mlaczu8088 I've gotta add one vehicle to the American tree then it's good to be recorded, the Swedish tree's finishing up planning - been really busy the last week so I've not had a chance to finalize its planning stage.

    • @mlaczu8088
      @mlaczu8088 10 місяців тому +1

      @@lazylime8046 ok, thank you

  • @TomatoSaucy
    @TomatoSaucy 10 місяців тому +39

    Did you do the American tech tree yet? Super stoked to see the (educated guess) AIr top tier tree especially the F-111 and F-16C :)

    • @FXIIBeaver
      @FXIIBeaver 10 місяців тому +5

      The F-111 is soon to be passed.

    • @jnlk2505
      @jnlk2505 10 місяців тому +5

      They should add south Korean and Turkish vehicles to the US tech tree since gaijin wants to fuck over the US with the m1a2T coming to chinese tree

    • @TomatoSaucy
      @TomatoSaucy 10 місяців тому +1

      @@jnlk2505 Also some other countries such as the Singaporean F-5S (personal benefit)

    • @unlockingsnow8571
      @unlockingsnow8571 10 місяців тому +7

      @jnlk2505 south Korea should go to Japan. If anyone doesn't like it, they can go speak to TEC about it and have a cry.

    • @braedynhoward3644
      @braedynhoward3644 10 місяців тому

      @@jnlk2505 fr

  • @onerxowns2202
    @onerxowns2202 10 місяців тому +1

    Latest MIG-31 family is MIG-31K with most modern radar and KHINJAL hypersonic missile

  • @Stan_1204
    @Stan_1204 10 місяців тому +4

    Yo I love you for making this man. Was looking forward to this lineup

  • @molashen771
    @molashen771 10 місяців тому +2

    I'm surprised that the mig 25 hadn't been added yet, it's so iconic.
    Gaijin pls I need my mach 3 steel shitbrick of a plane in my life

  • @alexmaximus9134
    @alexmaximus9134 10 місяців тому +1

    First time seeing your channel. And i absolutely loved this video. Amazing work.

  • @rowanyuh6326
    @rowanyuh6326 10 місяців тому +2

    Su-30sm2 after su-30sm and maybe tu22m3m would be cool

  • @ikea_manager_pok
    @ikea_manager_pok 10 місяців тому +1

    great video as always!

  • @skyer1232
    @skyer1232 10 місяців тому +2

    I could also add Su-37 after or before Su-35S or in Su-30s line, Su-47 as event or premium and Su-75 to MiG line

    • @danielelombardo8196
      @danielelombardo8196 10 місяців тому +1

      Too early for the su-75. It hasn't even started air trials yet

  • @IllustriousUnknown416
    @IllustriousUnknown416 10 місяців тому +5

    A tech tree MiG-21PFM or a MiG-21S should be a must. Maybe a MiG-21S with its correct R-11 engine (or even a MiG-21PF with a cannon pod, like some of the later ones were retrofitted with). But USSR needs a transition between the early MiG-21F-13 and the SMT.
    *Also, more MiG-17s (F, PF) and 19s (S, SV) are welcomed

    • @miquelescribanoivars5049
      @miquelescribanoivars5049 10 місяців тому +1

      Not holding my breath, but I would love the PFS with the forward hinged cockpit, GP-9 capability and SPS system. Also I hope we will see the RS2-US missiles at some point, even if they would be terrible in-game

    • @IllustriousUnknown416
      @IllustriousUnknown416 10 місяців тому

      @@miquelescribanoivars5049 100% agreed

  • @zenki_ls400
    @zenki_ls400 8 місяців тому +1

    dont forget the MIG-31 could also carry the KH-47 Kinzhal hypersonic missile which would be a really cool addition with its long range and it being almost impossible to intercept we would get the 700kg conventional warhead most likley since i dont think a "low yield" nuclear warhead would be fair as a nuke option since it travels at Mach 6 almost

  • @unlockingsnow8571
    @unlockingsnow8571 10 місяців тому +15

    Would be nice to see su47 and su37 as some kind of event vehcile or premium.
    Would be nicer as tech tree vehcile.
    Also where would the su75 checkmate go if you had to estimate?

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 10 місяців тому +2

      The Su-47 and Su-37 cannot come to the game as they were not military vehicles, they were simply technology demonstrators never meant for any kind of service. The Su-47 was also never armed and never capable of being armed.
      The Su-75 hasn't even had a first flight yet nor had more than a mockup seen, so we decided not to implement it. It would probably go under the Su-57 if I had to guess, since it has a lot of the same systems and parts but it's smaller and would probably be fitted with a newer radar (though these are all guesses assuming it ever enters service, which it most likely won't)

    • @mab2187
      @mab2187 10 місяців тому +3

      @@lazylime8046 We have quite a few vehicle that nvr went into service, hell they weren't even completed, E-100 as e.g. but this is a game and we wanna have these vehicles. 37 and 47 aren't as aggregious as F-16AJ in Japan. A proposal was implemented! Why can't fully funcitonal prototypes and the weapons we know they would've mounted, theres no weapon they would've had that we are unaware of.

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@mab2187 Because they aren't prototypes and they wouldn't have mounted anything - because the Su-37 and Su-47 weren't prototypes. They were technology demonstrators.

    • @mab2187
      @mab2187 10 місяців тому +10

      @@lazylime8046 would, could, should, its a game bruh, just have fun with these.

    • @uhhhhh..i-like-guns
      @uhhhhh..i-like-guns 10 місяців тому

      @@mab2187conut

  • @homefront1999
    @homefront1999 10 місяців тому +4

    For April fools we need to get something like a future North Korean Tree. Just have it lined up with nothing but Ace Combat planes and their insane stats. Nothing like having 200+ AA missiles.

  • @WurstWesen82
    @WurstWesen82 10 місяців тому +18

    Super Video Mat. Thank you. But you don't have to apologize for the video being so long. Future Tech tree videos are longer depending on the nation. For me it can also be an hour long - explained a bit more relaxed and even more detailed.

  • @lavamerkaENG
    @lavamerkaENG 10 місяців тому +1

    When I first time saw yak 131 I was fascinated by it

  • @DjellonPalatzzi
    @DjellonPalatzzi 10 місяців тому +26

    20 HOURS😭😭😭

  • @TopGunFan47
    @TopGunFan47 10 місяців тому

    5:11 i love how you included the pic of my countries airforce lol

  • @NoMercyt99
    @NoMercyt99 10 місяців тому +1

    I would also like to see later Versions of the R-27 Almos missile in game.
    The R-27EA for example would be a Active guided missile with a much larger range.
    The most interesting and outstanding missile would be the R-27EP.
    A Variant with a passive seeker which means it would basically be a anti radiation missile but against air targets.
    It would be most effective against AWACS planes but it would be alao interesting to see it be fired on 5th gen aircraft.

  • @kajmak64bit76
    @kajmak64bit76 10 місяців тому +2

    My theory which makes sense is that they may skip MiG-29S and just go to MiG-29SM and then later add the SMT
    SM is basically an S that has access to TV and Laser guided things... and idk if this is SM specific but it can also use the central / fuselage pylon for other things not just a drop tank
    So i think they should either skip the S and go to SM and then SMT which is an SM but muuuch more fat for extra fuel
    ( T in the name stands for "Toplivo" which is russian for fuel it"s same thing as MiG-21SMT )
    Or they can add the S... then SM and then SMT all in a folder or S + SM / SMT folder
    Or S / SM folder and SMT separate?

  • @MrUzbaba
    @MrUzbaba 10 місяців тому +1

    I think when the 5th gens will be added in the game the SU-75 will be more than an prototype so there is a possibility that it will be added as well.

  • @abdellahiehreimo3402
    @abdellahiehreimo3402 10 місяців тому +2

    Well made video bro well done this is a masterpiece and we all love ur content.
    But u forgot the Tu16 badger bomber with 9000 kg bomb lol and yak 25 and many other Soviet planes that could be added

  • @isaacjensen7859
    @isaacjensen7859 10 місяців тому +4

    Radar:🚫
    Raider:✅

  • @petrussaukkonen6048
    @petrussaukkonen6048 10 місяців тому +1

    the su33 su30 and su27 gonna be sick

  • @ctcrusader7479
    @ctcrusader7479 10 місяців тому +1

    6:44 The Su-25TM could replace its gun pods with flare pods.

  • @Echos_ofpengu
    @Echos_ofpengu 9 місяців тому +1

    I think the su 27-47 will be in the fighter line not in the heavy attacker line

  • @svx4477
    @svx4477 10 місяців тому +1

    the MiG-25 bombers would go crazy

  • @lil_sweden2323
    @lil_sweden2323 10 місяців тому +1

    I think adding of these vehicles is possible only if gaijin will do massive br decopression and edit of br for su25s, a10s and other more modern CAS planes, i mean 11.3 su39 ?

  • @Sakki007
    @Sakki007 10 місяців тому +1

    Oh yes I can't wait to fight Su 57 in my Saab105G

  • @tothmatyas2177
    @tothmatyas2177 10 місяців тому +3

    I would like some really fast aircraft (mig-25;su-24) but then we would need some bigger maps (for size like the Danish sim map)
    edit: have you submitted these tech trees (Israel; Russia;china) to Gaijin? I mean you should they are outstanding; detailed

  • @pedromaurutto
    @pedromaurutto 10 місяців тому +3

    Personally, I can't wait for the SU-30.

  • @ATF.USA-23718
    @ATF.USA-23718 10 місяців тому +1

    I hope the su 27m will be added as a premium

  • @lepood
    @lepood 5 місяців тому +1

    the only reason I trust is that gaijin really added the f-15 and su-27

  • @josephthebig2889
    @josephthebig2889 10 місяців тому +1

    The Su27s will most likely not be all in the attacker line but on the fighter line as well and it won't end with just mig 29 then mig 35, since the F16 is also on the American and many other countries fighter line and it can also carry ground attack. Most likely the Su57 will also end on the mig 29 line as they want as many planes as possible before getting a 5th gen fighter jet which they will also do for the Americans.

  • @Scorchluck
    @Scorchluck 10 місяців тому +1

    You forgot about the MiG-31K - it would be fun to throw a missile into a neighboring game (I mean a neighboring game in Steam, not a neighboring battle)

  • @cleverlaziness
    @cleverlaziness 10 місяців тому +2

    I would give my heart and soul for an SU-37 in an event

  • @pestomystic
    @pestomystic 10 місяців тому

    Pretty good, but I think we need a T-10S-3 as a premium Rank VII. R-60M's and R-27R/T's, Zook radar, no refuel tanks, no ground armament.
    You should folder Su-27s Early and Late into one folder. Su-37 should either lead to Su-35S, or be a premium. It was the testbed for advanced avionics, electronics, and control surfaces for both the Su-35S and Su-30SM. It's basically the first of the "High Maneuverability Sukhois" as some categorize them. Lastly, you need to add the Su-47, either as a tech tree, premium, or event vehicle. It was a testbed just like the 37, for the new features that became the Su-57. Maybe even a PAK-50 as a premium too.

  • @Russinh0
    @Russinh0 10 місяців тому +1

    At this time i think gaijin only will Add (maybe) a Better MiG-29 Variant to Fight with the F-14B and the Su-27 that im hyped asf to fight the F-16 and F-14B
    i want to see the MiG-25 and the Su-34

  • @mr_kb1420
    @mr_kb1420 10 місяців тому +1

    I’d love to see the Yak 130

  • @appa609
    @appa609 10 місяців тому

    Su-37 event would be sick

  • @ionutbogdanchis7250
    @ionutbogdanchis7250 10 місяців тому +2

    And please don t forget the MFI 1.44
    and SU 47

  • @thomasw695
    @thomasw695 10 місяців тому +1

    I cant wait to see su 27s in the game

  • @danielmorgan1118
    @danielmorgan1118 10 місяців тому +1

    Plz make a video on the US tech tree as well

  • @user-lv6ef8mb9w
    @user-lv6ef8mb9w 9 місяців тому

    The video is just super, but I have a small suggestion. It could be added as a premium aircraft to the 8th rank of the SU-47. This is an extremely interesting machine with the appearance of a space ship , so I think it would be very popular in the game
    (I apologize in advance for my poor English, and therefore I have to write through a translator)

  • @Mast3rChief9857
    @Mast3rChief9857 10 місяців тому +4

    how odd the su-9 is already in the tech tree yet it looks the same as the su-11

  • @haruka0002
    @haruka0002 10 місяців тому +1

    I will be dead when this is released

  • @acelohan
    @acelohan 10 місяців тому +1

    The thing is in this list, none real bomber added, even when Soviet have tons of them, Tu-22, Tu-95, Tu-160,...

  • @foxythepiratefox8678
    @foxythepiratefox8678 10 місяців тому

    Would love to see the ground version

  • @dustin2264
    @dustin2264 10 місяців тому

    @matAWG I see you have the su 57 at the bottom but we're is the designated call sign (terminator) I don't see it

  • @stanleylt20385
    @stanleylt20385 10 місяців тому

    Su-30 is like an F-15E, its a ground/naval strike version of the Su-27, still being able to do air to air combat plus the ability to carry air to ground weapons like anti ship missiles (Kh-35, P-800 oniks, brahmos,...), KABs, air to ground missiles like kh-31 (all variants) and Kh-59

    • @thesupreme8062
      @thesupreme8062 10 місяців тому

      Eh comparing an su 30 to the f15e is an insult

    • @stanleylt20385
      @stanleylt20385 10 місяців тому

      @@thesupreme8062 ability wise not performance wise tho

    • @thesupreme8062
      @thesupreme8062 10 місяців тому

      @@stanleylt20385 i mean the f15e is an infinetly more effective aircraft.

    • @stanleylt20385
      @stanleylt20385 10 місяців тому +1

      @@thesupreme8062 i mean this is not a comparison, the su-30 can do pretty much the same things the f15e can do.

    • @stanleylt20385
      @stanleylt20385 10 місяців тому

      @@thesupreme8062 besides, we all know how good your beloved f15e perform so no need to justify it again.

  • @STRYKER1467
    @STRYKER1467 10 місяців тому +11

    You are the only one whos making true content about russian forces without being biased by NATO and ukraine thats some dedication & bravery only a very few have to talk about everything from a neutral point.

  • @jeremyricq8751
    @jeremyricq8751 8 місяців тому

    I wonder where SU-47 and Mikoyan Project 1.44 would go.

  • @carltoncarter9559
    @carltoncarter9559 10 місяців тому +1

    I thought the mig-35 was equipped with an AESA radar or is that an upgrade version of it?
    edit: nvm I went back and heard him mention it

  • @samuraisoros5846
    @samuraisoros5846 10 місяців тому +1

    Make video like this on tanks would be interesting

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 10 місяців тому +1

      We'll be waiting until after this upcoming update to make ground trees - I've made a couple already but I'm waiting to update them since the next update will be primarily ground-focused.

  • @nighttide3079
    @nighttide3079 10 місяців тому

    We better get the SU-27 T-10 variant as some sort of event vehicle

  • @ValadarishUR
    @ValadarishUR 10 місяців тому +1

    Su-27 and mig-29 line don't make any sense, those versions have only small improvements (some versions posted has only updates at radar jamming, something that we don't have) for top tier fighters and bombers, don't expect nothing much as 2 more mig-29s (M and SMT), 3 Su-27 (A, M and SMT) and 2 Su-35 (Su-35S, because A it's just an engine upgrade of su-27m, and Su-35SM), and in bombers area probably only one su-33 in yak área and one su-30 at su-25 area.

  • @IceMarsoc77
    @IceMarsoc77 10 місяців тому

    you forgot one on the list the SU-47 Berkut

  • @ibum4908
    @ibum4908 10 місяців тому +1

    BRO WHAT WAS THAT INTRO!
    I NEED SAUCE!

  • @Parthemonium
    @Parthemonium 9 місяців тому

    If Tech Tree's become this large I'm voting for a split tree like with the Navy Trees.

  • @coldenttube9904
    @coldenttube9904 10 місяців тому

    Everyone be talking about modern su aircraft only or high tier migs
    I am just happy with the idea of good old su-15

  • @SuwatWatjinda
    @SuwatWatjinda 10 місяців тому

    I think MiG-25P early should be event vehicle rank 7
    And Su-25TM could be rank 8 because short-range & medium-range Air-to-Air Missile full options

  • @matthewriley4935
    @matthewriley4935 9 місяців тому

    I've seen a Su35 fly irl and just...wow

  • @splezo1927
    @splezo1927 10 місяців тому +1

    It would be fun to see this with the other nations in the game, like the USA, Germany, Sweden, etc.

    • @FoloQ
      @FoloQ 10 місяців тому +1

      He has them already
      Russia was his only outdated one

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 10 місяців тому

      @@FoloQ Nah Sweden and America are also outdated, America's pretty much finished production but I need to get to making Sweden.

  • @krower11
    @krower11 10 місяців тому +2

    To be honest. The Su-25k grinder was a good investment. The Russian tree is in a good situation and gets a lot of attention from the developers.

  • @mycatiscute1658
    @mycatiscute1658 10 місяців тому +1

    I didn't sleep to watch the video, I already drank 3 liters of coffee

  • @warthunderclips2808
    @warthunderclips2808 10 місяців тому

    mig25 as such a low BR rank would create the same issue with low-ish tier 104s where they can run all game and waste the 25mins. just smt to keep in mind when balancing such aircraft

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 10 місяців тому +1

      MiG-25 is like less capable then F-104 lol

  • @ghostofthepotato8143
    @ghostofthepotato8143 10 місяців тому +1

    Can you do one for all the nations?

  • @sid-et7
    @sid-et7 9 місяців тому +1

    what abt the Tu-95, and Tu-22 and the Tu-22M/M2/M3 ?

  • @stevenkravitz6377
    @stevenkravitz6377 9 місяців тому

    I would think that 5th gen aircraft would probably be considered to be rank IX.

  • @sanmiguel4774
    @sanmiguel4774 10 місяців тому +2

    I would like to see the su47 berkut

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 10 місяців тому

      Unfortunately that's not a Russian Aeroforce vehicle, that was a Sukhoi technology demonstrator. It's technically a civilian aircraft since it was never armed, didn't have a radar and wasn't intended to ever be used in combat.

    • @stevenortiz9008
      @stevenortiz9008 10 місяців тому

      ​@@lazylime8046event vehicle should be fine then

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 10 місяців тому

      @@stevenortiz9008 No, it wouldn't have any armament at all. You wouldn't be able to do anything.

  • @gman7281
    @gman7281 2 місяці тому

    I tbink it would be cool to have an experimental aircraft line tho a lot of prem are experiment aircraft

  • @user-mz7jm1ec5s
    @user-mz7jm1ec5s 10 місяців тому

    4th gen can be milked for ages adding new f-15, f-16, f-18, su-27/30, mig-29, etc variants every patch

  • @oort84
    @oort84 10 місяців тому

    MiG-23bis? Where does it come from?
    This tree looks like how it might look like in the "close" future, not in perspective

  • @jameshopkins5702
    @jameshopkins5702 10 місяців тому

    What they should do is look into Consol systems because I can dump 40 different flares chef and regular pitch. My plane cut. My afterburners and missiles will find me every single time I can’t avoid them ever there’s something wrong with that I fire missiles I see three or four flares pop out my missile goes for the flares I never hit the enemy people say skill issue. If so, then let’s play together show me how

  • @nuneswg_
    @nuneswg_ 10 місяців тому

    Que voce acerte irmão, pois eu só to começando a upar a linha aérea soviética por conta do su 57

  • @joshy9464
    @joshy9464 10 місяців тому

    Still hoping for a functional CIWS that shoots down both planes and guided missiles

  • @Mr.Brttttt
    @Mr.Brttttt 10 місяців тому

    how did you make these?

  • @ATF.USA-23718
    @ATF.USA-23718 2 місяці тому

    I hope they add the mig 41 with the ram jet version as premium and the turbine jet version as tech tree also the role of the jet is a stealth interceptor aircraft its and for its speed Mach 4 to Mach 5 and equipped with an anti-missile laser, weapons will be lazer weapons hypersonic missiles and anti satellite missiles

  • @qittfthegame6128
    @qittfthegame6128 10 місяців тому

    I wanted to choose American tech tree on every kind of tech tree vehicle but they limited the amount of crews and have to use golden eagle to expand.

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 10 місяців тому

      Don't play America to be honest, it's really weak in air and ground.

    • @DerDrecksack87
      @DerDrecksack87 4 місяці тому

      ​​@@lazylime8046 i dont know about air but i hear the F16 is pretty capable, on ground the US is pretty good especially at 11.3 and above with the Abrams variants, they are behind germany/sweden who are dominant at top tier atm and pretty much on par with russia, nothing like italy, japan & france and partially england who are objectively not nearly as good, with israel being somwehere between the top 4 nations & the mentioned weaker nations.

  • @Delta-6501
    @Delta-6501 10 місяців тому

    i *NEED* the MiG-31B in this game

  • @justsavv6378
    @justsavv6378 10 місяців тому

    im hoping the su 47 will be added to it will probably be a premium but if it is it will be the first premium i buy

    • @STRYKER1467
      @STRYKER1467 8 місяців тому

      Due to the upcoming update i had a short review and realized theres no Su-37 either.

  • @ZvozvzvzvzvzvzvGoida
    @ZvozvzvzvzvzvzvGoida 10 місяців тому +3

    Когда-нибудь мои внуки откроют су57 и т90мс....

    • @zumixrusx4118
      @zumixrusx4118 10 місяців тому

      Внуки твоих внуков

  • @deacondalegend5685
    @deacondalegend5685 10 місяців тому

    what are the chances on any of these predictions being correct?

  • @Kankakee4243
    @Kankakee4243 10 місяців тому +2

    When will you do USA Air and German air?

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 10 місяців тому

      Both are already done and uploaded!

  • @mlaczu8088
    @mlaczu8088 10 місяців тому +1

    i cant wait fr

  • @poklianon8453
    @poklianon8453 10 місяців тому

    by the time gaijin adds all this the su 75 would come out

  • @warfarelooselet
    @warfarelooselet 10 місяців тому +2

    🎉🎉🎉

  • @leovicyto666
    @leovicyto666 10 місяців тому

    Bro. the mig 25 is a interceptor to chase the valkirie bomber. it shoud carrie R-40R and R-40T

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 10 місяців тому

      And the MiG-25PD could carry 2 radar missiles while also carrying 4 r-60m's on dual-mounts, so i mean..

  • @Dark_Productions
    @Dark_Productions 10 місяців тому +1

    If su47 isn't in there I'll be sad

    • @aenodarr7936
      @aenodarr7936 10 місяців тому

      Probably a marathon/battlepass addition, cause it's only 1 prototype

    • @stevenortiz9008
      @stevenortiz9008 10 місяців тому

      ​@@aenodarr7936so it can be added

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 10 місяців тому

      @@aenodarr7936 It wasn't a prototype, it was a tech demonstrator - one that was never armed and never even had a radar.

    • @Dark_Productions
      @Dark_Productions 10 місяців тому

      @@lazylime8046 there was one mockup with missile bay and it could carry a large amount of missiles in it

  • @cosmicbass
    @cosmicbass 10 місяців тому +1

    just so I don’t get it twisted, this is basically just a prediction right?

    • @vidbobanec8384
      @vidbobanec8384 10 місяців тому +1

      Yes

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 10 місяців тому +2

      Yes and no, it's mostly just going over what can come to the game with a rough outline on where stuff will go

  • @MuhammadAli-255
    @MuhammadAli-255 10 місяців тому

    What about mig1.44, Su-47,su-37 and su-75?.

  • @id_Usher
    @id_Usher 10 місяців тому

    A lot of mistakes. For example, the MiG-23 BIS, there was no such aircraft. There were only MiG-23M, MiG-23MS, Mig-23ML, Mig-23MLD. And export variations. There was no modification of the BIS.

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 10 місяців тому

      war thunder player moment

  • @user-bg8qc4vo1p
    @user-bg8qc4vo1p 10 місяців тому +1

    I'd like the Japanese version, please!

  • @yuvalpima-bk3nr
    @yuvalpima-bk3nr 10 місяців тому +1

    Why didn't you do the future of the USA tech tree