This was a mint scene between Daniel Craig and and Ralph Fiennes. Shows a more antagonistic side to the Bond/M relationship. Even more so than some of the older movies.
Very realistic, that’s the attitude of someone who knows they are wrong and still try’s to act like they are right. And James calls him out on his bullshit at every opening.
Imagine if M had the personality of Harry from In Bruges (another Ralph Fiennes performance). Bond: "No offense, Mallory. I mean no disrespect, but you're a c**t. You've always been a c**t. You and your c**t fucking weapon." M: "You leave my fucking weapon out of it!" Bond: "You're right, I'm sorry. I retract it." M: "Insulting my weapon, that's going overboard mate!" Bond: "I retracted it, didn't I!?"
“He’s still got it. Only James Bond can speak to Voldemort like that and get away with it!” (I got the idea from a Holly line from the first Die Hard movie. “He’s still alive. Only John can drive somebody that crazy!”)
"If you've nothing left to give, you are irrelevant. You've done your bit and we thank you for your service. Again. Goodbye." The film's attitude toward Bond summed up perfectly.
Yeah bond flying into space or dress up like a clown doesn't sum up or when he was asked to resign in licence to kill. It's only a problem because he die or i don't like a film so i will find every possible dialogue to whine about it even when same happen dozens of times in previous movies 🤣🤣
This was such a refreshing scene, because Mallory consistently cocked things up and it was great to finally see him called out on it, especially since it's Bond that ultimately suffers the most for his bad decisions. The scene really underscores the difference between Judi Dench's M and this one, as well, from the lack of professionalism to the bitterness. Mallory couldn't take his emotion out of the equation, and didn't have the mind for the job to gain and sustain respect. He had Bond and his own staff turn against him, all in an effort to do what is right. He failed as a leader, in about the biggest way one can.
@@ABMultimediaDesigner That's ultimately why people like Bond exist, though. To competently right the wrongs of those who fail to live up to their duties. And thank the heavens for them, because we'd be extinct by now without them.
@@WhiteScarsEmo Can't imagine it. She was very much aligned with Bond's thinking, of putting power in more stable hands, and not investing so heavily in a system that could easily be turned into a weapon of war. Heracles created the very thing she warned about during her inquest: an enemy without nation or obvious motivation could use it to wreak havoc with complete cover. Before it was noticed, whole races or other sects of the population could be swiftly wiped out. It would be a far cry from the old school ways she was used to, which is another reason I think she'd refuse to support it. As she said in "Casino Royale": "Christ, I miss the Cold War."
Bond's not wrong about Mallory's mistakes in creating Heracles. The dangers far outweigh any benefits if it fell into the wrong hands, which is exactly what happened. Entire ethnicities could have been wiped out for good.
But if Heracles was real it would be near the perfect weapon and not very easy to perfect and replicate, criminals and governments would need top expert chemists, physicists and microbiologists etc. I can understand M intentions Heracles would only target certain individuals and their relatives so your near guaranteed to kill the target without harming or killing anyone else. Furthermore, no one could be prosecuted because so many people would be infected with Heracles before reaching a target you wouldn't know who infected who, also being "off the books" the creators would denied Heracles existed.
I understand why they developed such a weapon from a strategic point of view. However, that does not make it better. As you said, a weapon of such power is too risky to simply exist, you cannot guarantee that only you yourself will hold onto it forever.
@@WhiteScarsEmo And they are not even to blame, that's the sad thing. As soon as new weapon technology drops you can either get one for yourself, or fall behind other nations in influence. Because it's really really hard to trust nations.
@@Mediados I remember my junior high science teacher telling us about nitroglycerin. (This was in the early-90's, long before we had issues with domestic terrorism and school/spree shooters.) It was so volatile to manufacture in quantities that counties banned it. Alfred Nobel managed to find a way to stabilize it and created dynamite. The military applications were obvious and major powers were trying to get as much of it, or ways to manufacture it on their own or make it better.
Love how Fiennes plays M, great actor... tbh though M as a character really drops the fu*king ball in this film 🤣 Like, wasn't he the one in Spectre sceptical about all these modern warfare/espionage techniques? Yeah, cyber surveillance is a big no-no, but a weaponised virus? Totally cool.
I guess he grew sick of car crashes, car chases, MPs getting shot, exploding watches, exploding buildings and hoped to kill the crims by throwing some kind of selective ebola lmao
He was a guy who was ordered to babysit mad scientist's pet project approved way higher than he and which probably would be nothing but big waste of time. Except it wasn't and got stolen and mad scientist went AWOL as well. Never came orders to shut it down either so he just let it roll. As flawed as Gareth Mallory was he was first to step forth as man in charge of whatever shitstorm just blew loose and he was absolutely right: he doesn't answer to his underlings: he answers to His Majesty's government.
He’s a case of the kind of worker that got caught up in the business, happens more often than you think, that’s why M had control of what she was doing and who to trust, she just got real lucky it was Bond and other relationships in governments she gained throughout the years, Mallory didn’t have the same kind of circle it seems, so he fell victim to the very control he sworn against to get ahead It’s sad honestly, but like I said, it happens to the best of people, that business of trade and barter why it’s not meant for everyone
Excellent Pay off to the antagonist scene between M and Bond in Casino Royale. In that scene M criticizes Bond for not seeing the bigger picture. In this scene, the roles are reverse with Bond being the one to see the big picture, while M busy nursing his ego.
this gives me the idea that before the previous m died, she must have influences Mallory into believing bond was reckless annd insubordinate so now seeing this meeting it shows that Mallory is swayed by m influence on her beliefs of bond
@@allenkirk555 love that’s it different to Dench. She was more maternal. Mallory and Bond have that respect for one another but have never seen eye to eye
@@stephenkoranteng6260 Same here if they were to ever talk to me like that first. And ditto for my father if they were to try to provoke him in any way.
Ralph perfect be James Bond like Pierce Brosnan than Daniel Craig.I hope Bond 26 will return to Commenwealth director like Christopher Nolan/Matthew Vaughn/Steve Mcqueen/Edgar Wright/Tom Hooper/Joe Wright/Martin Campbell/Sam Mendes.
@@deangraves7462 Since you're obviously knowledgable about D&D I can use references: Lawful Evil comes in many forms, and most are not honorable. If you're a backstabbing asshole you're not honorable or dutiful, but still lawful if you have a ruleset you follow. Both Gortash and Thorm are Lawful Evil, but one is true to his word in every bargain while the other treats his subordinates like shit.
Yeah, while it seems likely they'll reboot the series again, don't see why Ralph Fiennes shouldn't be allowed to continue as M. Judi Dench continued as M from the Brosnan era after the series was rebooted for the Craig era.
When they said Fiennes was gonna replace Dench as M I thought, hmm the Bernard Lee callback has begun (Lee played M in Dr No, and I identified Mallory as Lee's M), but I admit I had doubts. What I got in SPECTRE and NTTD was an M who was flawed but good, cocked up and was willing to admit that he did but couldn't say anything because he was following the interests of the UK. You have to admit, that's some character development in just two movies, and Fiennes' acting sells it.
I saw an audition clip of Sam Neill trying for the role. I think Fiennes could've done the role justice as a cold professional like Sean Connery did and Neill could've done the same with the Roger Moore charisma and quips.
My observation pertaining to No Time To Die is Saffin was not the main villain but it's Millroy (M). The Nanobots was he's creation and not Saffin. It would have been much better if Saffin was colluding with a rogue M and bond killed both or killed Saffin and exposed M and got him arrested. The film was poorly written for a pointless self sacrifice of James bond which was unnecessary. In other words M killed Bond..Saffin was just a tool.
Um, Mallory secretly commissioned Valdo Obruchev to make the nanobots. Obruchev was the true creator of Project Heracles, with or without M or Lyutsifer Safin, that slimy cockroach Obruchev would’ve gleefully unleashed it.
People already accept it as one of the greatest Bond films ever made, and those who still don't can't be thought about or their opinions taken seriously.
People already accept it as one of the greatest Bond films ever made, and those who still don't can't be thought about or their opinions taken seriously.
I see M to become the main antagonist in a future James Bond movie----without James Bond of course but someone would get revenge on M for Bond's murder. I think M would order Bond killed and see his own personal treachery.
Hated Mallory in this movie and I decided to remove No Time to Die from the list of Bond movies that I know of. Too heartbreaking and depressing for a Bond enthusiast like me.
WHo was the best actor to never play Bond? James Brolin had the face, body and the athletic ability but he couldn't do the English voice. Sam Neill is the best at projecting menace but he can't do fight scenes. Daniel Craig damn near tore up his body doing the stunt work for his Bond movies. Here's what I think: if you're going to use a stunt man anyway, just get the best actor, period. I have the same problem with the Batman movies, it's going to be a stunt man in the suit anyway so what difference does it make.
Worst "James Bond" ever, not to mention, the worst "M" ever. Michael G. Wilson should be congratulated for taking the world's foremost movie franchise and turning it into the 2st century version of "Second City."
Such a stupid script - although last part of movie is You only live twice book - the Poison garden and shatterhand / why can’t they just do a book properly instead of cherry picking bits
“My *GOD* you’re thirsty at the moment!”
You have no right to speak to me that way.
@@petercelano7057 You have no right to make insinuations about my judgment.
@@jamesthedragon2344 if youve nothing left to give, you are irrelevant
@@prideofmanny2981 You’ve done you’re bit and we thank you for your service, Again. GOODBYE!
It's definitely the same desk
This was a mint scene between Daniel Craig and and Ralph Fiennes. Shows a more antagonistic side to the Bond/M relationship. Even more so than some of the older movies.
Very realistic, that’s the attitude of someone who knows they are wrong and still try’s to act like they are right. And James calls him out on his bullshit at every opening.
in de books also he hate that man M
@@JamesDavis-nm5tf Like the confrontation between J Robert Oppenheimer and President Harry Truman?
I thought it was because... it was male rivalry... what if it was a female M? Hopefully the same still applies.
It’s really difficult to act drunk without overdoing it or making it obvious. Ralph Fiennes is a master of his craft
Ralph gave a lesson in acting 🎉
Drunk? 🤣🤣
@@strikerbowls791 he’s not drinking apple juice mate
Only Bond can speak to Lord Voldemort in his way and get away with it!!!
I Agree!
"You have no right to speak to me that way! *AVADA KEDAVRA!!!* "
Ironic how one is Bond and the other was considered to play Bond once upon a time. Bond vs Bond
Imagine if M had the personality of Harry from In Bruges (another Ralph Fiennes performance).
Bond: "No offense, Mallory. I mean no disrespect, but you're a c**t. You've always been a c**t. You and your c**t fucking weapon."
M: "You leave my fucking weapon out of it!"
Bond: "You're right, I'm sorry. I retract it."
M: "Insulting my weapon, that's going overboard mate!"
Bond: "I retracted it, didn't I!?"
“He’s still got it. Only James Bond can speak to Voldemort like that and get away with it!”
(I got the idea from a Holly line from the first Die Hard movie. “He’s still alive. Only John can drive somebody that crazy!”)
"If you've nothing left to give, you are irrelevant. You've done your bit and we thank you for your service. Again. Goodbye." The film's attitude toward Bond summed up perfectly.
Yeah bond flying into space or dress up like a clown doesn't sum up or when he was asked to resign in licence to kill. It's only a problem because he die or i don't like a film so i will find every possible dialogue to whine about it even when same happen dozens of times in previous movies 🤣🤣
@@monsieurchadster6309 Always a pleasure to piss off a NTTD fanboy.
@@LeonWick526 You seem to have experience getting pissed off. Good for you kiddo. Now i want more movies like NTTD in future 😁
James Bond looks so well dressed even when he is pissed off!
This was such a refreshing scene, because Mallory consistently cocked things up and it was great to finally see him called out on it, especially since it's Bond that ultimately suffers the most for his bad decisions. The scene really underscores the difference between Judi Dench's M and this one, as well, from the lack of professionalism to the bitterness. Mallory couldn't take his emotion out of the equation, and didn't have the mind for the job to gain and sustain respect. He had Bond and his own staff turn against him, all in an effort to do what is right. He failed as a leader, in about the biggest way one can.
and sadly, James Bond paid the ultimate price...
@@ABMultimediaDesigner That's ultimately why people like Bond exist, though. To competently right the wrongs of those who fail to live up to their duties. And thank the heavens for them, because we'd be extinct by now without them.
I have to wonder if M would've approved of Heracles if it was possible during her tenure...
@@WhiteScarsEmo Can't imagine it. She was very much aligned with Bond's thinking, of putting power in more stable hands, and not investing so heavily in a system that could easily be turned into a weapon of war. Heracles created the very thing she warned about during her inquest: an enemy without nation or obvious motivation could use it to wreak havoc with complete cover. Before it was noticed, whole races or other sects of the population could be swiftly wiped out. It would be a far cry from the old school ways she was used to, which is another reason I think she'd refuse to support it. As she said in "Casino Royale": "Christ, I miss the Cold War."
1:49 Well License To Kill would have played out very differently if M had that attitude lol
You're so right.
As soon as Bond got up, I wanted him to say “Hold up a mirror, Mallory. You’ll never be as good as your predecessor.”
MISSED OPPORTUNITY!
Bond's not wrong about Mallory's mistakes in creating Heracles. The dangers far outweigh any benefits if it fell into the wrong hands, which is exactly what happened. Entire ethnicities could have been wiped out for good.
But if Heracles was real it would be near the perfect weapon and not very easy to perfect and replicate, criminals and governments would need top expert chemists, physicists and microbiologists etc. I can understand M intentions Heracles would only target certain individuals and their relatives so your near guaranteed to kill the target without harming or killing anyone else.
Furthermore, no one could be prosecuted because so many people would be infected with Heracles before reaching a target you wouldn't know who infected who, also being "off the books" the creators would denied Heracles existed.
I understand why they developed such a weapon from a strategic point of view. However, that does not make it better. As you said, a weapon of such power is too risky to simply exist, you cannot guarantee that only you yourself will hold onto it forever.
@@Mediados After the reveal of the "Atom Bomb", we can only imagine how every burgeoning power was salivating at a chance to have one of their own...
@@WhiteScarsEmo And they are not even to blame, that's the sad thing. As soon as new weapon technology drops you can either get one for yourself, or fall behind other nations in influence. Because it's really really hard to trust nations.
@@Mediados I remember my junior high science teacher telling us about nitroglycerin. (This was in the early-90's, long before we had issues with domestic terrorism and school/spree shooters.) It was so volatile to manufacture in quantities that counties banned it. Alfred Nobel managed to find a way to stabilize it and created dynamite. The military applications were obvious and major powers were trying to get as much of it, or ways to manufacture it on their own or make it better.
Love how Fiennes plays M, great actor... tbh though M as a character really drops the fu*king ball in this film 🤣 Like, wasn't he the one in Spectre sceptical about all these modern warfare/espionage techniques? Yeah, cyber surveillance is a big no-no, but a weaponised virus? Totally cool.
I guess he grew sick of car crashes, car chases, MPs getting shot, exploding watches, exploding buildings and hoped to kill the crims by throwing some kind of selective ebola lmao
He was a guy who was ordered to babysit mad scientist's pet project approved way higher than he and which probably would be nothing but big waste of time. Except it wasn't and got stolen and mad scientist went AWOL as well. Never came orders to shut it down either so he just let it roll. As flawed as Gareth Mallory was he was first to step forth as man in charge of whatever shitstorm just blew loose and he was absolutely right: he doesn't answer to his underlings: he answers to His Majesty's government.
He’s a case of the kind of worker that got caught up in the business, happens more often than you think, that’s why M had control of what she was doing and who to trust, she just got real lucky it was Bond and other relationships in governments she gained throughout the years, Mallory didn’t have the same kind of circle it seems, so he fell victim to the very control he sworn against to get ahead
It’s sad honestly, but like I said, it happens to the best of people, that business of trade and barter why it’s not meant for everyone
2:20 Voldemort's face and fury speech...
1:33 "I ANSWER TO AN INTEREST OF MY COUNTRY NOT YOU!" That Was Also My Favourite Quote from No Time To Die.
“And to Felix Leiter?”
@@master-of-many-fandoms2020 I certainly don't answer to Felix Leiter.
@@jamesthedragon2344 Perhaps because he’s dead.
@@master-of-many-fandoms2020 I'm sorry. I had a lot of respect for Leiter. Look if you have information, I'd be happy to receive it.
2:20 theme reminds me of Bond's argument with M in Licence to Kill.
I Agree!
My Favourite Quote Was At 2:18 "My God, You're Thirsty At The Moment.", Imagine to anyone who drinks fizzy drinks or water or other drinks! FUNNY!
It's definitely the same desk....
Excellent Pay off to the antagonist scene between M and Bond in Casino Royale. In that scene M criticizes Bond for not seeing the bigger picture. In this scene, the roles are reverse with Bond being the one to see the big picture, while M busy nursing his ego.
It's definitely the same desk.
this gives me the idea that before the previous m died, she must have influences Mallory into believing bond was reckless annd insubordinate so now seeing this meeting it shows that Mallory is swayed by m influence on her beliefs of bond
Lol definitely the same desk 😂
Very Funny!
@@allenkirk555 love that’s it different to Dench. She was more maternal. Mallory and Bond have that respect for one another but have never seen eye to eye
@@MrTardis11 I Agree!
**Throws away visitors pass**
2:22 Voldemort
someday I want to talk like that to my boss
Hah, I have those feelings every day!!
@@stephenkoranteng6260 Same here if they were to ever talk to me like that first. And ditto for my father if they were to try to provoke him in any way.
I can see a little Voldemort in this scene
And we thank you for your service…AGAIN!
M is sexy when he's angry. Hell, M is sexy full stop.
Ralph perfect be James Bond like Pierce Brosnan than Daniel Craig.I hope Bond 26 will return to Commenwealth director like Christopher Nolan/Matthew Vaughn/Steve Mcqueen/Edgar Wright/Tom Hooper/Joe Wright/Martin Campbell/Sam Mendes.
I had the most respect for felix
I was REALLY hoping at this point that M was going to be the main villain… that would have been something.
It doesn't fit his character. He has always been a dutiful, honorable person.
He should be in a future film. M would make a great villain with a lot of potential for villainous qualities.
@@LittleDebbie187717 God no, it would change his character completely.
@@Mediados Some villains are dutiful, and honorable. It is called Lawful Evil.
@@deangraves7462 Since you're obviously knowledgable about D&D I can use references:
Lawful Evil comes in many forms, and most are not honorable. If you're a backstabbing asshole you're not honorable or dutiful, but still lawful if you have a ruleset you follow. Both Gortash and Thorm are Lawful Evil, but one is true to his word in every bargain while the other treats his subordinates like shit.
i love ralph fiennes' acting. i hope he stays
I Agree!
Yeah, while it seems likely they'll reboot the series again, don't see why Ralph Fiennes shouldn't be allowed to continue as M. Judi Dench continued as M from the Brosnan era after the series was rebooted for the Craig era.
if not how about Eva Green as M. if Maud Adams could do two major roles...
@@ryancraig1552 don't forget joe don baker
@@wwb16 there's been a few!
Is it just me or did Mallory just went into lord Voldemort mode on him?
Very much so
Expelliamus..
2:20 very voldemort there 😂😂
I saw the picture of No Time To Die and Avengers Endgame together
When they said Fiennes was gonna replace Dench as M I thought, hmm the Bernard Lee callback has begun (Lee played M in Dr No, and I identified Mallory as Lee's M), but I admit I had doubts. What I got in SPECTRE and NTTD was an M who was flawed but good, cocked up and was willing to admit that he did but couldn't say anything because he was following the interests of the UK. You have to admit, that's some character development in just two movies, and Fiennes' acting sells it.
Bond: My god you're thirsty at the moment
M: Avada Kedavra!
if james bond boss was my dad, he would take away my computer for not going to sleep on time
There’s only one Ralph Fiennes, you can easily see the better actor. And Fiennes would have made a great Bond in his prime, losing out to Brosnan.
I saw an audition clip of Sam Neill trying for the role. I think Fiennes could've done the role justice as a cold professional like Sean Connery did and Neill could've done the same with the Roger Moore charisma and quips.
@@WhiteScarsEmowell Neil wasn’t British so I’m sure his chances of getting the part were 0.0
@@markmccreadie6212 George Lazenby and Pierce Brosnan weren't British when they got the part of 007. (Lazenby is Australian, and Brosnan is Irish).
This 007 really does push his luck with M
I wouldn't bait Lord M-demort like that
'I certainly don't answer to Felix Leiter...'
literally seconds later knowing he's dead
'I'm sorry...I had a lot of respect for Leiter...'
Definitely Ralph Fiennes’s best moment as M.
M is the Pacific Office Automation Hiring manager for Field Copier Technician Candidates.👍
James was one snarky comment away from getting avada kedavra'd there
This Film It's Dedicated In Loving Memory Of Stan Lee And Dorothy Steel.
This part scared me 😱
this is voldemort reincarnated as M
James Bond is unsure if Medworks will be heavy Lifting or not 👍🇬🇧
I don't actually rememer this being in No Time to Die. Is it an outtake?
Voldemort is bonds boss 😂😂
My observation pertaining to No Time To Die is Saffin was not the main villain but it's Millroy (M). The Nanobots was he's creation and not Saffin. It would have been much better if Saffin was colluding with a rogue M and bond killed both or killed Saffin and exposed M and got him arrested. The film was poorly written for a pointless self sacrifice of James bond which was unnecessary. In other words M killed Bond..Saffin was just a tool.
Yo quiero lo que fuma este tipo
There were certainly a number of shortcomings in the writing departement, but your proposal's no less ridiculous.
Um, Mallory secretly commissioned Valdo Obruchev to make the nanobots. Obruchev was the true creator of Project Heracles, with or without M or Lyutsifer Safin, that slimy cockroach Obruchev would’ve gleefully unleashed it.
The time will come when people understand that No Time To Die is one of the best Bond movies ever made. Period.
People already accept it as one of the greatest Bond films ever made, and those who still don't can't be thought about or their opinions taken seriously.
People already accept it as one of the greatest Bond films ever made, and those who still don't can't be thought about or their opinions taken seriously.
0:01:Maid in manhatten reference....
This scene is mean bond
They Should cast Liam Neeson as the New James Bond, cause Liam Neeson can Kick Ass
This Film It's Dedicated In Loving Memory Of Roger Moore And Sean Connery.
Really? How do u know?
@@paulmacartney8266 Because He died 7 years later.
I see M to become the main antagonist in a future James Bond movie----without James Bond of course but someone would get revenge on M for Bond's murder. I think M would order Bond killed and see his own personal treachery.
Bond vs. Voldemort
Hated Mallory in this movie and I decided to remove No Time to Die from the list of Bond movies that I know of. Too heartbreaking and depressing for a Bond enthusiast like me.
This is not a James Bond Movie. What a betrayal for the die hard Bond Fans.
It's a James Bond movie, one of the good ones. Stop being toxic
Felix died?
Mallory faalt aan de lopende band
James Bond is mean to Gareth Mallory
The M stands for Miles, not Mallory
WHo was the best actor to never play Bond? James Brolin had the face, body and the athletic ability but he couldn't do the English voice. Sam Neill is the best at projecting menace but he can't do fight scenes. Daniel Craig damn near tore up his body doing the stunt work for his Bond movies. Here's what I think: if you're going to use a stunt man anyway, just get the best actor, period. I have the same problem with the Batman movies, it's going to be a stunt man in the suit anyway so what difference does it make.
Sean Bean definitely.
Did Jim and M need to yell
This is the first time I’ve heard someone refer to him as Jim and I love it
@@Idk-dc7hv they didn’t need to tell did they
Worst "James Bond" ever, not to mention, the worst "M" ever. Michael G. Wilson should be congratulated for taking the world's foremost movie franchise and turning it into the 2st century version of "Second City."
'
Daniel Craig should had left Bond after Skyfall
Ahhhh WAIT!!! The last full movie I saw was Skyfall. When she died I stopped watching
Wrong decision, then
Such a stupid script - although last part of movie is You only live twice book - the Poison garden and shatterhand / why can’t they just do a book properly instead of cherry picking bits
Not to mention Bond strangling Blofeld and saying "Die, Blofeld, DIE!" is also from You Only Live Twice book.
Such a stupid comment
Wow this looks crap, glad i never watched the whole thing
What an awful film.