Well said. I feel like I would be happy with the omega but I would always have that craving for the explorer. The explorer has always been my dream watch and intended to get it at some point in my life I just have to be patient.
I’m still a “Noob” to the watch game, but to me the greatest attribute a watch can have is accessibility. I can find / not have to wait 18-24 months to get an Omega. That fact alone has me side with Omega. Brilliant timepiece that I can actually purchase.
This is an unpopular take but, the lack of accessibility is partially what makes a watch (or anything) desirable. Even Mr. Spock said "you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing after all as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true."
@@facetiousmonkey5322 You're 100% correct, the lack of availability is what's driving the hype. Rolex watches aren't 3x Omega watches (they might not even be better at all), but the lack of availability turns it into a status symbol rather than just a watch - which is an entirely different type of market.
I honestly am curious of the math of consumers they're alienating (myself) vs consumers who are now 'in' because it's a status symbol. If that bubble bursts (which almost all do) are the folks they alienated just gonna come back? I will have probably moved on.
@@facetiousmonkey5322 Totally agree. I think within a watch (or any hobby) you have “status” displayed in two ways. 1. I am wearing something that not everyone can afford. 2. (Especially with Rolex) I have something that not everyone can afford, and even those that can have a most difficult time finding / acquiring. I collect bourbon and it is the same thing. You have to have the money to purchase rare bottles, but more importantly, the relationships that bring access to fine bottles. Or, you play the “Rolex Game” of wait 1-2 years to maybe get something.
Grand Seiko need to make a decent bracelet first! I would look at a White Birch If they did. It would probably be a bit small though. Omega Bracelets are not great looking either IMO.
I wanted the Rolex Explorer but after waiting several months and not being able to source one locallly, I got the Aqua Terra in blue (38mm). After wearing it for a while, it grew on me. I really love this watch. It's well made and the details like the anti reflective coating, the lines on the face and the hour markers make this a better choice for me than the Explorer.
Now that you’ve had your AT 38 for a few years, how’s the polished center links on the bracelet holding up? I’m most likely going to pull the trigger on a blue dial 41 but I’m now wondering if the 38 would look more balanced. Time to go to an AD and put them on wrist.
I have the green AT. Its a truly great watch. I am also getting the World Timer. It is on order. Should get that in a week or two.. Bracelet for the AT, blue rubber strap for the World Timer. I thing I'll get the green strap for the AT as well.
You'd probably find with daily wear that the polished centre links would lose their lustre over a few months. Alternatively stick it on a a leather strap.
@@WH-hi5ew I'm about a year in and so far mine haven't. The only thing stopping me from putting it on a NATO is that it's the only watch I have on a bracelet right now.
Man, that Aqua Terra just looks gorgeous. Never liked light-coloured dials but this one is an exception. Always liked simple watches with centre seconds, the fact that it also has a date complication is a huge bonus. The want is really strong with this one.
The AT has been on my radar for a one (luxury) watch collection. The things that stand out to me over the Explorer are: 1. Availability 2. Movement specs 3. Water resistance 4. Date complication 5. Jumping hour complication
This is easy: Aqua Terra all day, every day. The only Rolex that would win is a ceramic Submariner at the same price, and since that will never happen, AT comes out on top!
I tried a 41mm green dial on this week?I'm sold on it. Rolex are a bit of a joke now,stupid false market prices, manufactured waiting lists,and for what. A watch that collectors can't now appreciate. Omega every time
I'm back to work after these bloody lockdowns, working hard and saving money and this summer i'm buying Aqua Terra 38 in black. One of the best everyday watches!
For me it’s the Aqua Terra all the way - however it would have to be the 41mm with the 8900 movement. 60 hr power reserve, twin barrel co-axial movement which provides constant torque release for all of its 60 hr power reserve for constant accuracy, 15000 gauss, silicon balance bridge for shock resistance, METAS certified with movement in case to 6 positions, bi-directional automatic winding, etc etc. Stick it on a rubber strap for sporty looks, or a leather strap for classy looks. Such a versatile everyday usable timepiece. The dial does amazing things in various light conditions too. I’ve heard as a piece of hardware this watch being described as the best watch money can buy under £50k?
@@lnielsen9866 - Noted. I have owned the 8900 Aqua Terra for the last two years and it’s a stunning timepiece! I am however contemplating swapping it for the 38mm 8800. As you know the only other difference is that the 8800 has quick set date, whereas the 8900 has quick set hour function. I am leaning towards the smaller timepiece though. Last year I purchased a Hamilton Khakhi Field automatic as an everyday watch at it is also stunning. Just as accurate as the 8900. However, having now worn the 38mm Hamilton on a daily basis I think I prefer the smaller Aqua Terra …
@@lnielsen9866 - Yes I totally agree! 37-39mm with around 10mm thickness is my new preferred dimension of choice thanks to the Hamilton. I agree that either the quick set hour or quick set date are just as functional as each other! I’d be happy with either! I think the quick set date is probably more useful to be honest. If I don’t wear the 8900 for a while it takes a lot of quick set hour turning to achieve the required date, whereas quick set date would definitely be quicker! I think I may just make the swap …
The Aquaterra has a date function and the bracelet has polished center links. The Explorer has none of that. In the Omega lineup, the Aquaterra competes with the Rolex DateJust and not the Explorer.
If omega offered more watches without date, not just special additions, they would have a killer lineup. I wear a 2004 Railmaster, which replaced my Explorer and is the perfect watch. A no date AT with micro adjust would be my next watch without any doubt.
@@dgbucko To be fair, according to market research apparently most customers prefer a date when given the option, and if it's done as cleanly as Omega does with the AT and SM300M why not take it? If the date detracts from the design then I agree (I generally prefer a date, but would never own a date Rolex), but a subtle 6 o'clock date that's there when you need it, but unnoticed when you don't, is welcome to me. I can't disagree about the lack of micro-adjustment (hopefully the new Constellation clasp is added to the AT and RM soon), but as I'd personally get the 41mm AT (with 20mm bracelet) I'd put the micro-adjustment clasp off the SM300 on it and call it a day.
I think the aqua terra is a little underrated …it’s a lovely piece and is good value for money ..I was making the same choice but went for the Explorer 214270 ..no regrets !
Good watch but the bracelet is terrible, no micro adjustability and the edges are sharp when they should be beveled. Just don't buy it if your looking for a good bracelet.
I love my Aqua Terra (41mm, blue dial). Love the sunburst effect. I spent months trying on different sizes and colours before I decided on the one I ended up with. Is the Explorer better? I don't know. It's not like I can go walk into an AD and try one on. And that makes all the difference. (I also have a rule of not buying over retail)
Always loved the Aqua Terra. It's a great balance between sporty and dressy, and works for pretty much every occasion. The thing that bothers me about it is how the minute hand has an arrow head and the hour hand doesn't. The tip of the hour hand always looked to me like it broke off. Just my personal taste
I had this exact dilemma back in 2018. My heart was saying AT, my head was saying Explorer (and it's better residuals)... In the end I chose the AT and have no regrets. After almost 3 years of ownership, it still brings me joy every time I wear it. If I have any criticism of the watch, it's with the butterfly clasp. While the clasp is elegant and lovely to look at, it has no adjustment movement which is mighty inconvenient in the summer heat. Another great vid.
then they couldn't have the butterfly style clasp that actually hides the clasp. I do agree with you though, I'd prefer a standard clasp with an on the fly adjustment over a streamlined look for sure.
In my life, Omega was the brand that was impressed upon me as the "I made it" watch. The AT is an amazing watch and a fantastic "do it all" selection. The Explorer does not inspire me nearly as much. Great video!
The 38mm Aqua Terra is 12.3mm thick, versus the Explorer 36mm is 12mm thick. They are pretty much in the same ball park. The Aqua Terra appears to be thicker because of the thicker lugs and dome crystal.
I own the full-size AT in green; it's my first higher-end watch and definitely a purchase I'm happy with. I like that it has versatility, but the details still feel dynamic. I tend to find Rolex a bit too austere and stoic for my tastes.
Aquaterra 38mm in blue sunburst dial is the best looking everyday simple watch PERIOD 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰 SATISFACTION to look at the front and the back 10/10. Prices have to be backwards comparing to rolex
Love the AT. Having said that I just bought a SM300M. Because I couldn’t stomach paying 3X the price for a sub. WRT price, I think one has to compare what the watches can ACTUALLY be had for. Let’s face it- most of us can’t get a sub or explorer at an AD. So a grey market AT vs grey market Explorer. The Rolex goes for >2X the price of the AT. Fine if you can afford it, but pretty much makes the decision for you if you can’t. In Canada, subs are selling for 18 grand. Explorers selling for 15 grand. I bought a brand new SM300m for 6k. A full 1/3 the price of a sub. I simply couldn’t justify it. On paper from an AD, they’re only a couple grand apart. But that just simply isn’t reality. Great video man!!!
Great video as always. Just one remark: we talk at half speed while talking watch, when you are saying to subscribe and to like the channel you hit 5x speed. It doesn’t get old, it always cracks me up.
I've definitely switch my focus from wanting an explorer to wanting an Aquaterra. I was always a bit worried that with the ex I'd find it wanting, as an everyday/frequent wear, because it doesn't have a date, which is something I like. For this reason and now that the 39mm ex is no more and prices on grey market are beyond any sense I've definitely discounted it. As far as the AT and the 300 are concerned is the AT is just a nicer looking watch.
Another great video. I got my Aqua Terra 2 years ago (the one with the yellow and black seconds hand). It was a pre owned, only a couple of years old, box and papers, from a local independent AD. It was nearly half the retail price! I absolutely love it. To me they are almost like a Grand Seiko. People that know about watches really appreciate them. Keep up the great work 👍
The biggest problem with the Aqua Terra is: 1) Crown to stiff to turn 2) Crown slippery because it effectively has not knurling Compare this crown with the one on the Tudor Pelagos and there is no chance for the Aqua Terra. Omega must change that slippery crown.
I love the Aquaterra; it’s beautiful! I don’t care for the 19mm lugs, butterfly clasp, and lack of micro-adjustments, though. If Omega addressed these “issues” it would be perfect.
I’ve had my sight, saving up money for years for various watches, including explorer and grand seiko, without even taking a glance at omega aqua terra. Then one day I just walked in an omega Local AD, slapped on the aqua terra black dial and it was friggin amazing. It was my best purchase of the decade
Both fantastic watches. I suspect the Rolex Explorer 1 will stand the test of time better as the dial on the Omega AT is less timeless and will point to a particular period in watch collecting. I do prefer the AT options as the blue and Sedna gold is very sharp, the green dial looks fantastic and the black dial does look classic. With this said, if it were a single watch to wear and have nothing else in the collection, I can see the Explorer 1 being my choice. But I’m in the other minority who likes the gold 369 over the lumed version - seems more versatile to me.
I love the dial, but I think the case and bracelet need a serious rework. It just does not feel cohesive or seamless. Also quick adjust on a bracelet needs to be on all luxury watches of this price point, IMHO.
I think the AT is a superb value, and I prefer it over the seamaster 300. I feel it’s more versatile and I don’t have a need for the helium escape valve and stronger water resistance. 150m more than meets my needs. I think the AT has the added value over the Explorer of being acquirable tomorrow if anyone wants one. Thanks for the video Adrian!
Is been in a ´wait list’ for the 39mm with cash ready for 12 months, then Goldsmiths contacted me to say I needed a NEW wait list appointment because the 39mm had been discontinued. No way. So I started shopping around and fell in love with the AT. I’m so happy with my decision!
The Aqua Terra is my grail, so you can probably guess my preference. Comparing directly to the Explorer I (my second favourite Rolex behind the Skydweller) I love the AT's dial design, especially the subtle 6 o'clock date, and the display caseback. I wish it had the 2mm micro-adjust clasp off the new Constellation, but I've heard it's easy to swap the 20mm butterfly clasp on the 41mm (my choice) with the single fold micro-adjust clasp off the Speedy Racing 44mm, so I'd do that. I also agree that there's an issue with Omega's pricing. They seem determined to charge more for the "premium" 8900 calibre, hence why the 8800 powered SM300M is less than the 8900 powered Aqua Terra 41mm and Planet Ocean 600M 43.5mm. Unfortunately, this plan falls apart when smaller versions of 8900 watches (such as the 34/38mm AT and 39.5mm PO) cost exactly the same, despite having supposedly "cheaper" 8800 movements. That said, this is a comparison to Rolex, and the Aqua Terra could put its prices up by 10-15% and still be decent value compared to even the Oyster Perpetual, let alone the Explorer.
Here is the question: as the new mass of Rolex admirers improve their knowledge of horology while also becoming more frustrated with Rolex watches' lack of availability and high grey market prices, will they soon realized the brilliant mechanical designs and esthetic beauty of other brands like Omega and chose them over Rolex basic models like OP and Explorer? Another question: will Tudor newer models with its daring designs and COSC & METAS certification undercut both Rolex and Omega basic lower end models?
They are wildly different in quality. Rolex uses better steel which is more expensive and tougher to shape, It's all done by hand. Omega components are mass produced and 'hand assembled'.
@@patrickbateman529 Rolex’s are not hand shaped. They are totally machined and assembled by hand as well. 904 steel is less corrosive then 316 but it’s softer. 904 handles scratches better but dents easier.
Great video man! I was choosing between these exact two watches. I ended up buying the Aqua Terra (38mm blue dial). The main reason tbh was the availability. The whole buying experience was simply better with Omega. I felt like if I was paying this amount of money for a watch I didn't want to end up in some queue and have to wait for months to get what I actually payed for. Anyway, I'm extremely happy with Aqua Terra! Although I don't think you can go wrong with any of these watches.
I WANT to like it, but in person the AT just doesn’t quite sing. Can’t quite put my finger on it. Functionally it needs a thinner case and a more-easily adjustable clasp.
I have the aqua terra 41mm. Superb watch and a lot of watch for your coin. My only gripe is there's no micro adjustment on the clasp. That's it. Other than that, it's perfect.
I love the aqua terra, I got mine in 2019 as my first ever "proper watch" and find it extremely versatile. It's the perfect watch for me and I still love to wear it!
Nice comparison between the Aquaterra and the Explorer. Both great watches, but for me the AT easily wins for the design and for the movement that is far superior and beautifully decorated.
My wife bought me my Aqua Terra 41mm Grey dial/blue hands, for my 60th birthday last year and i could not be happier. It makes me feel special and i smile every time i took at it. Happy me!
I love the aqua terra & the fact that i can actually go into a shop, try it on & then actually buy it is a big deal, whereas with the rolex that’s not an option so it gets ruled out. I have a speedy pro and a seamaster pro, so difficult to pull the trigger on the aqua terra. 🤔
Before buying, need to factor in the Paul Thorpe Index. i.e. risk of getting mugged and the watch stolen from you. Guess it depends on your location and lifestyle, but it’s good to think about it.
I agree, these are tool/everyday watches for good people with deep pockets so legibillity should be important. If you see them as luxury watches for the more impecunious I think you're missing the point.
@@marcusrawlinson5024 I don’t, it’s just a matter of taste in my case. A white dial on a dress watch can look elegant. On a sports watch not so much. I couldn’t care less how much or little they might cost.
I’ve just bought an aqua terra blue dial 8900 It is my first high end watch and I spent a lot of time researching different watches I absolutely love this watch so much so I have ordered the blue alligator strap and the rubber strap and am very pleased to wear this watch every day Thanks for the video
For me, many of Omega’s watches are too thick. The Aquaterra 38mm is 13.2mm thick. That’s dive watch territory. By contrast, the Explorer (14270) is 11mm thick.
couldn't agree more. Even in the diver realm, 13mm is my max. My first decent acquisition was the seamaster 300 pre-coaxial. Still the thinnest diver around ; mines ticking less than +/-0.5s/day and is 20y old.
Pretty sure 13.2mm is the thickness of the 41mm, with the thicker 8900 bawled calibre. The 38mm is 12.5mm thick; still thicker than the Explorer, but not by much (and you get a display caseback and 50m more WR, so I guess it's a trade off).
Adrian, so on your recommendation, I tried Chronext. Bought the Aqua Terra and delighted with the Chronext service. Great recommendation and fantastic watch!
I adore my AT. The incredible rubber strap, good looks, and the hour jump complication (on the 8900 movement/41mm version) make it my default travel watch.
I used to think the same, I even bought it overseas, I too also had the Aqua Terra on a rubber strap, but have just traded it in for a Tudor Pelagos (blue).
@@gabev6172 16.5cm / ~6.5", and the 41mm AT fits me perfectly. Wrist shape matters though since lug to lug is the real measurement that matters across the span of your wrist.
I've had my Aqua Tera Black dial 41mm for a year now and I absolutely love it! Like others have commented, a brushed bracelet with a deployant clasp would make it a better everyday watch.
As an owner of the Planet Ocean 8800, I do sometimes consider swapping it for an Aqua Terra, in the interests of having a more "simple" watch, like you mention. That being said I find the AT slightly too dressy and the PO tends to feel slightly more GADA
@@bgandjsco1 I get that some people have strong views on watches with a date complication, but for me personally and especially if we’re talking “tool” watches, a day to day wear has to show the date….otherwise what’s the point?….
Some people might find date window unnecessary, but I do feel it is much more convenient to have date on watch, it's just easier than get out your phone to check date. The antimagnetic ability of Omega is really awesome, they put this feature on all the omega watches which is just a good job that no other mechanical watch brand does !
Love my grey dial aqua terra with blue accents, bought if from an AD 2 years ago and haven’t taken it off. Such an underrated piece. Would love to see you do a comparison of the new Tudor black bay ceramic vs the seamaster 300 ceramic 👍🏼
The aquaterra can go from the beach to the boardroom effortlessly, perfect "one watch" piece IMO. I have the earlier version with the plain sunburst silver dial and polished indices, I wish they still offered plain dial versions in their current line.
I normally prefer a 36mm watch, but I've worn a few 38mm aqua terra's and it fits my 6 1/2 inch wrist amazingly, I definitely recommend the skinny amount us checking it out.
I was looking for a datejust and when I was added on a 3 years waiting list, i realised that you can't beat chronext's price on a 41mm AT, black dial, and especially the waiting time. I just love that watch!
@@chriszivoder2650 I like the AirKing as well, it's just not as versatile as the AT and the movement is better in the AT. I own several of each brand but prefer Omega for value.
Completely agree about the price. Aqua terra is amazing, especially with the white dial. Not a fan of the polished centre links and should be priced £3500-£4000 retail I reckon.
@@patrickbateman529 fair enough. I think it’s a reasonable choice for purists / smaller guys. I have an AK now which is a better fit for me size wise (I have a wrist over 7) and visually is much more interesting in person. If I ever win the lottery or get a big promotion my dream would be a 40mm President (white gold or platinum), sort of this everyday style on steroids. Life’s too short to always be under the radar.
Aqua Terra is great, but the Explorer is the best time only watch. I always looked at the Aqua Terra as the affordable, available alternative to the Explorer. But as soon as you say alternative, what you are really saying is, it's the other one I want. So I stumped up for the Explorer, the AT would not have scratched the itch.
What do you think about the thickness of the Omega compared to the Rolex? What about the bracelet and clasp? I really like the Omega, but the thickness, lack of adjustment, and polished bracelet seem like negatives to me.
I agree. I would also revert back to the vertical teak pattern of the previous generavtion or maybe with no teak pattern at all, like in the first generation. Then it would be The Watch for me.
Great vid Aidrian, I love these match ups! it’s hard not to be biased as I have an Aqua terra blue dial (with the vertical teak effect dial) but....... it’s still definitely the better watch. The explorer is superb and it’s just a case of what takes your fancy. You couldn’t go wrong with either. The Rolex name will get more admirers but does that make a better brand?
I would say that Seamaster Professional 300M previous gen watch is a better buy over any Aqua Terra for versatility, especially in blue, it wears confrontable at 41mm width and circa 13mm thickness, looks great during causal weekend and also discreetly slides under shirt and suit
No mention of the jumping hour on the Omega? Like you, I respect both brands, but it seems value for dollar/pound versus brand cache. Omega for me in this comparison.
@@BarkandJack The 38mm ATdoesn't have the jumping hour feature. Only the bigger 41mm does. It is 8800 vs 8900 movements. I would personaly go with the quick-set date instead and the smaller watch. Great video as always, Adrian!
My head says Omega. My heart says Rolex. My wallet says neither. 😅
Save up, squirrel away money here and there, and in a year or two, you will have the cash that you need.
lol I am with you
when you live in third world country with a meal cost only 0.5 dollars.. just me and my already expensive 21 dollar casio
Fax
Well said. I feel like I would be happy with the omega but I would always have that craving for the explorer. The explorer has always been my dream watch and intended to get it at some point in my life I just have to be patient.
I’m still a “Noob” to the watch game, but to me the greatest attribute a watch can have is accessibility. I can find / not have to wait 18-24 months to get an Omega. That fact alone has me side with Omega. Brilliant timepiece that I can actually purchase.
This is an unpopular take but, the lack of accessibility is partially what makes a watch (or anything) desirable. Even Mr. Spock said "you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing after all as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true."
@@facetiousmonkey5322 You're 100% correct, the lack of availability is what's driving the hype. Rolex watches aren't 3x Omega watches (they might not even be better at all), but the lack of availability turns it into a status symbol rather than just a watch - which is an entirely different type of market.
I honestly am curious of the math of consumers they're alienating (myself) vs consumers who are now 'in' because it's a status symbol. If that bubble bursts (which almost all do) are the folks they alienated just gonna come back? I will have probably moved on.
@@facetiousmonkey5322 Totally agree. I think within a watch (or any hobby) you have “status” displayed in two ways.
1. I am wearing something that not everyone can afford.
2. (Especially with Rolex) I have something that not everyone can afford, and even those that can have a most difficult time finding / acquiring.
I collect bourbon and it is the same thing. You have to have the money to purchase rare bottles, but more importantly, the relationships that bring access to fine bottles. Or, you play the “Rolex Game” of wait 1-2 years to maybe get something.
@@996rick I’ve Moved on, but in 5 years if I can get a Pepsi GMT for $9300 at an AD I would have a hard time passing!!!
The moment Omega puts micro adjustment on every model, the brand will be fearsome. Same for Grand Seiko
You are spot on. Have the blue AT, can never get it just right on the bracelet. However, that rubber strap is THE best!
Love GS. Have 2, looking to buy a 3rd (sbga231), but man I wish their bracelets matched the quality and innovation of what they are attached to.
@@jswede1 hahha same here, I only own one, hated the bracelet but I was lucky enough and the bracelet fits perfectly!
@Richard Westwood Omega? Chinese bracelets? I think you're mistaken, bud
Grand Seiko need to make a decent bracelet first!
I would look at a White Birch If they did. It would probably be a bit small though.
Omega Bracelets are not great looking either IMO.
I wanted the Rolex Explorer but after waiting several months and not being able to source one locallly, I got the Aqua Terra in blue (38mm). After wearing it for a while, it grew on me. I really love this watch. It's well made and the details like the anti reflective coating, the lines on the face and the hour markers make this a better choice for me than the Explorer.
I have a blue aqua terra and a black dial submariner....I like both tremendously...but I enjoy the aqua terra more, which surprises most people
bought the AT as a compromise too. Was super happy with it, but after a year I sold it and got the explorer. Hard to beat a true classic.
Mine’s a black original version, totally agrees when u mentioned “grew on me”…
but still ... you wanted a Rolex and not an Omega
Now that you’ve had your AT 38 for a few years, how’s the polished center links on the bracelet holding up? I’m most likely going to pull the trigger on a blue dial 41 but I’m now wondering if the 38 would look more balanced. Time to go to an AD and put them on wrist.
The aqua terra is my grail. saving every month to hopefully being able to afford it in a year or 2. the Aqua terra world timer aswell is just stunning
Good luck bro! I was in the same boat. I finally managed mine this year. Wish you all the best!
@@Jayantahit thank you very much! Congratulations on the hard work!
I have the green AT. Its a truly great watch. I am also getting the World Timer. It is on order. Should get that in a week or two.. Bracelet for the AT, blue rubber strap for the World Timer. I thing I'll get the green strap for the AT as well.
I had the green AT thought it was ok but not great…flicked it in the same week and got a sub.
Just get the Worldtimer. That watch alone can be a one-watch collection. Its that good.
Wish the Aqua Terra didn't have polish centre links. The older ones didn't, the first 8500 AQ, with vertical pattern, blue dial is a classic.
You'd probably find with daily wear that the polished centre links would lose their lustre over a few months. Alternatively stick it on a a leather strap.
@@WH-hi5ew I'm about a year in and so far mine haven't. The only thing stopping me from putting it on a NATO is that it's the only watch I have on a bracelet right now.
Yeah, that's a huge downside for me. I'm sure you could take it to a professional jeweler or watchmaker and they could brush them out.
@@josephburton3232 Probably but it's always a risk that the job is not well done.
Not just the maintainece, its the look. Brushed suits everything and polished does not.
You don’t know how long i waited for this video, cheers Adrian.
Thanks for watching Nabil.
The Omega Railmaster is also an underated explorer alternative.
Omega Railmaster = Rolex Milgauss
I agree!
Yea it’s cool but just get the aqua Terra it looks better
The only thing I'm not a fan of is the polished center links. Besides that, what a killer watch!!!
For real, I can't stand those center links.
rail master then?
It is super easy to have them brushed. Like a 5 minute inexpensive job for any jeweler.
Scratch 🧲 magnet
Man, that Aqua Terra just looks gorgeous. Never liked light-coloured dials but this one is an exception. Always liked simple watches with centre seconds, the fact that it also has a date complication is a huge bonus. The want is really strong with this one.
The AT has been on my radar for a one (luxury) watch collection. The things that stand out to me over the Explorer are:
1. Availability
2. Movement specs
3. Water resistance
4. Date complication
5. Jumping hour complication
The fifth attribute only is only valid if you go for the 41mm version with the 8900 co-axial movement
Aqua Terra hands down. Date, exhibition case back, no comparison needed.
No micro adjust on bracelet so it’s no go for me. Stunner otherwise, pity.
@@Anonymouslyme1 exactly.
@@Anonymouslyme1 Yep, total idiots.
True price. Explorer:10k+. Aquaterra: give it or take 4-5k. That makes a sense
@@sultanr932 explorer is 7k and you can easily get it for 5k. nobody buys the explorer
This is easy: Aqua Terra all day, every day. The only Rolex that would win is a ceramic Submariner at the same price, and since that will never happen, AT comes out on top!
I tried a 41mm green dial on this week?I'm sold on it. Rolex are a bit of a joke now,stupid false market prices, manufactured waiting lists,and for what. A watch that collectors can't now appreciate. Omega every time
I'm back to work after these bloody lockdowns, working hard and saving money and this summer i'm buying Aqua Terra 38 in black. One of the best everyday watches!
For me it’s the Aqua Terra all the way - however it would have to be the 41mm with the 8900 movement. 60 hr power reserve, twin barrel co-axial movement which provides constant torque release for all of its 60 hr power reserve for constant accuracy, 15000 gauss, silicon balance bridge for shock resistance, METAS certified with movement in case to 6 positions, bi-directional automatic winding, etc etc. Stick it on a rubber strap for sporty looks, or a leather strap for classy looks. Such a versatile everyday usable timepiece. The dial does amazing things in various light conditions too. I’ve heard as a piece of hardware this watch being described as the best watch money can buy under £50k?
@@lnielsen9866 - Noted. I have owned the 8900 Aqua Terra for the last two years and it’s a stunning timepiece! I am however contemplating swapping it for the 38mm 8800. As you know the only other difference is that the 8800 has quick set date, whereas the 8900 has quick set hour function. I am leaning towards the smaller timepiece though. Last year I purchased a Hamilton Khakhi Field automatic as an everyday watch at it is also stunning. Just as accurate as the 8900. However, having now worn the 38mm Hamilton on a daily basis I think I prefer the smaller Aqua Terra …
@@lnielsen9866 - Yes I totally agree! 37-39mm with around 10mm thickness is my new preferred dimension of choice thanks to the Hamilton. I agree that either the quick set hour or quick set date are just as functional as each other! I’d be happy with either! I think the quick set date is probably more useful to be honest. If I don’t wear the 8900 for a while it takes a lot of quick set hour turning to achieve the required date, whereas quick set date would definitely be quicker! I think I may just make the swap …
The Aquaterra has a date function and the bracelet has polished center links. The Explorer has none of that. In the Omega lineup, the Aquaterra competes with the Rolex DateJust and not the Explorer.
If omega offered more watches without date, not just special additions, they would have a killer lineup. I wear a 2004 Railmaster, which replaced my Explorer and is the perfect watch. A no date AT with micro adjust would be my next watch without any doubt.
No date and bracelets with micro adjustment would be even better.
@@dgbucko To be fair, according to market research apparently most customers prefer a date when given the option, and if it's done as cleanly as Omega does with the AT and SM300M why not take it? If the date detracts from the design then I agree (I generally prefer a date, but would never own a date Rolex), but a subtle 6 o'clock date that's there when you need it, but unnoticed when you don't, is welcome to me.
I can't disagree about the lack of micro-adjustment (hopefully the new Constellation clasp is added to the AT and RM soon), but as I'd personally get the 41mm AT (with 20mm bracelet) I'd put the micro-adjustment clasp off the SM300 on it and call it a day.
@@gpearce11 99%of watches have dates, to cater for those that prefer them. For those that don't it is very frustrating.
I think the aqua terra is a little underrated …it’s a lovely piece and is good value for money ..I was making the same choice but went for the Explorer 214270 ..no regrets !
Good watch but the bracelet is terrible, no micro adjustability and the edges are sharp when they should be beveled. Just don't buy it if your looking for a good bracelet.
@@blackwood3243 which one are you talking about ? The 214270 bracelet is not as you describe at all...
@@vianouche1 220.10.38.20.03.001
I love my Aqua Terra (41mm, blue dial). Love the sunburst effect. I spent months trying on different sizes and colours before I decided on the one I ended up with. Is the Explorer better? I don't know. It's not like I can go walk into an AD and try one on. And that makes all the difference. (I also have a rule of not buying over retail)
I own a 41mm Aqua Terra and absolutely love it. Such a great everyday watch.
Always loved the Aqua Terra. It's a great balance between sporty and dressy, and works for pretty much every occasion. The thing that bothers me about it is how the minute hand has an arrow head and the hour hand doesn't. The tip of the hour hand always looked to me like it broke off. Just my personal taste
True. Rolex looks like it copied Benz logo.
bro now that youve said that i cant unsee it xDD
I'd buy the Aqua Terra because I think it's the better looking of the two, especially with the blue dial.
The Aqua Terra by far is the best bang for your buck in the luxury watch segment. I prefer the 41mm with the 8900 movement.
I own this as well and love it. Keeps great time as well
@@stevenbriandunn5648 I have the orange second hand Golf edition, 41 mm orange Omega Nato strap, Yes I love this watch.
The 8909 movement is great! What color is yours?
Technically, Omega (nor Rolex) are in the luxury watch bracket.
@@Shavenuw129 says who?
I had this exact dilemma back in 2018. My heart was saying AT, my head was saying Explorer (and it's better residuals)... In the end I chose the AT and have no regrets. After almost 3 years of ownership, it still brings me joy every time I wear it. If I have any criticism of the watch, it's with the butterfly clasp. While the clasp is elegant and lovely to look at, it has no adjustment movement which is mighty inconvenient in the summer heat. Another great vid.
Appreciate the walk and talk intro like old times.
I prefer them. I sound too fake when I’m just talking straight to camera.
If Omega throw in an 'on the fly' adjust clasp, then for me, the Omega becomes the obvious choice.
I’m curious if the new bracelet on the Seamaster 300 will work on the 41 mm aqua terra? Then you have problem solved.
Great point James!
then they couldn't have the butterfly style clasp that actually hides the clasp. I do agree with you though, I'd prefer a standard clasp with an on the fly adjustment over a streamlined look for sure.
I love my railmaster but will probably sell it because of how much I hate the butterfly bracelet
I love my AT first generation 😍
In my life, Omega was the brand that was impressed upon me as the "I made it" watch. The AT is an amazing watch and a fantastic "do it all" selection. The Explorer does not inspire me nearly as much. Great video!
A disadvantage for me is the height of the Aqua Terra. Especially at the 38mm version. In this point the Explorer wins.
The 38mm Aqua Terra is 12.3mm thick, versus the Explorer 36mm is 12mm thick. They are pretty much in the same ball park. The Aqua Terra appears to be thicker because of the thicker lugs and dome crystal.
I own the full-size AT in green; it's my first higher-end watch and definitely a purchase I'm happy with. I like that it has versatility, but the details still feel dynamic. I tend to find Rolex a bit too austere and stoic for my tastes.
Aquaterra 38mm in blue sunburst dial is the best looking everyday simple watch PERIOD 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰 SATISFACTION to look at the front and the back 10/10. Prices have to be backwards comparing to rolex
Love the AT. Having said that I just bought a SM300M. Because I couldn’t stomach paying 3X the price for a sub.
WRT price, I think one has to compare what the watches can ACTUALLY be had for. Let’s face it- most of us can’t get a sub or explorer at an AD. So a grey market AT vs grey market Explorer. The Rolex goes for >2X the price of the AT. Fine if you can afford it, but pretty much makes the decision for you if you can’t. In Canada, subs are selling for 18 grand. Explorers selling for 15 grand. I bought a brand new SM300m for 6k. A full 1/3 the price of a sub. I simply couldn’t justify it.
On paper from an AD, they’re only a couple grand apart. But that just simply isn’t reality.
Great video man!!!
Great video as always. Just one remark: we talk at half speed while talking watch, when you are saying to subscribe and to like the channel you hit 5x speed. It doesn’t get old, it always cracks me up.
I've definitely switch my focus from wanting an explorer to wanting an Aquaterra. I was always a bit worried that with the ex I'd find it wanting, as an everyday/frequent wear, because it doesn't have a date, which is something I like. For this reason and now that the 39mm ex is no more and prices on grey market are beyond any sense I've definitely discounted it. As far as the AT and the 300 are concerned is the AT is just a nicer looking watch.
Another great video. I got my Aqua Terra 2 years ago (the one with the yellow and black seconds hand). It was a pre owned, only a couple of years old, box and papers, from a local independent AD. It was nearly half the retail price! I absolutely love it. To me they are almost like a Grand Seiko. People that know about watches really appreciate them. Keep up the great work 👍
The biggest problem with the Aqua Terra is:
1) Crown to stiff to turn
2) Crown slippery because it effectively has not knurling
Compare this crown with the one on the Tudor Pelagos and there is no chance for the Aqua Terra. Omega must change that slippery crown.
I love the Aqua Terra, particularly that white dial, although I prefer it on the rubber strap. One of the next watches on my hit list.
The white dial really pops on the rubber!
I love the Aquaterra; it’s beautiful! I don’t care for the 19mm lugs, butterfly clasp, and lack of micro-adjustments, though. If Omega addressed these “issues” it would be perfect.
I’ve had my sight, saving up money for years for various watches, including explorer and grand seiko, without even taking a glance at omega aqua terra.
Then one day I just walked in an omega Local AD, slapped on the aqua terra black dial and it was friggin amazing. It was my best purchase of the decade
Both fantastic watches. I suspect the Rolex Explorer 1 will stand the test of time better as the dial on the Omega AT is less timeless and will point to a particular period in watch collecting. I do prefer the AT options as the blue and Sedna gold is very sharp, the green dial looks fantastic and the black dial does look classic. With this said, if it were a single watch to wear and have nothing else in the collection, I can see the Explorer 1 being my choice. But I’m in the other minority who likes the gold 369 over the lumed version - seems more versatile to me.
what period of watch collecting are we in and how does the AT represent it?
The aquaterra is probably my favorite watch that I don't think I will ever own. Every model looks amazing but none of them truly excite me
Sux to be you.
@@bigmacdaddy1234 that was unnecessarily rude lol
I have the exact same feelings for the Seamaster 300. Love the idea of the watch but the actual end product just doesn't do anything for me :( .
Agree. Hence I sold mine and I had the nicer model on a rubber strap
I love the dial, but I think the case and bracelet need a serious rework. It just does not feel cohesive or seamless. Also quick adjust on a bracelet needs to be on all luxury watches of this price point, IMHO.
I think the AT is a superb value, and I prefer it over the seamaster 300. I feel it’s more versatile and I don’t have a need for the helium escape valve and stronger water resistance. 150m more than meets my needs. I think the AT has the added value over the Explorer of being acquirable tomorrow if anyone wants one. Thanks for the video Adrian!
Is been in a ´wait list’ for the 39mm with cash ready for 12 months, then Goldsmiths contacted me to say I needed a NEW wait list appointment because the 39mm had been discontinued. No way. So I started shopping around and fell in love with the AT. I’m so happy with my decision!
Same...😅
Adrian, get her this Aqua Terra so that you can wear it too. The Aqua Terra looks stellar in that white dial!
The Aqua Terra is my grail, so you can probably guess my preference. Comparing directly to the Explorer I (my second favourite Rolex behind the Skydweller) I love the AT's dial design, especially the subtle 6 o'clock date, and the display caseback. I wish it had the 2mm micro-adjust clasp off the new Constellation, but I've heard it's easy to swap the 20mm butterfly clasp on the 41mm (my choice) with the single fold micro-adjust clasp off the Speedy Racing 44mm, so I'd do that.
I also agree that there's an issue with Omega's pricing. They seem determined to charge more for the "premium" 8900 calibre, hence why the 8800 powered SM300M is less than the 8900 powered Aqua Terra 41mm and Planet Ocean 600M 43.5mm. Unfortunately, this plan falls apart when smaller versions of 8900 watches (such as the 34/38mm AT and 39.5mm PO) cost exactly the same, despite having supposedly "cheaper" 8800 movements. That said, this is a comparison to Rolex, and the Aqua Terra could put its prices up by 10-15% and still be decent value compared to even the Oyster Perpetual, let alone the Explorer.
Here is the question: as the new mass of Rolex admirers improve their knowledge of horology while also becoming more frustrated with Rolex watches' lack of availability and high grey market prices, will they soon realized the brilliant mechanical designs and esthetic beauty of other brands like Omega and chose them over Rolex basic models like OP and Explorer? Another question: will Tudor newer models with its daring designs and COSC & METAS certification undercut both Rolex and Omega basic lower end models?
Yes to the Rolex admirers and no, Tudor won’t come close to Omega.
@@atl3630 haven't Tudor just released a METAS certified movement? I think that's pretty close in my opinion. Specs seem similar.
No and Maybe/They Already do.
The Pelagos is better (better purchase) than a Submariner IMO
Stop comparing both brands and acting like a watch snob.
I think the real question is whether the Omega Obsessives should have access to free Therapy
Both are really nice pieces , but why must Omega put AR coatings on the top of a sapphire glass so that it scratches ?
Something off about the case shape and the proportions of bracelet to case on the Aqua Terra.
Always aqua terra!!!! I bought the 41mm version with the olive dial last we. Love it.
with the green dial is my grail watch( Congratulations bro!!
Sorry Adrian but I don’t agree that Rolex and omega are in different ranges. Maybe on brand recognition but not quality.
He's biased towards rolex so hardly surprising he thinks that. He openly admits he's a Rolex fanboy.
They are wildly different in quality. Rolex uses better steel which is more expensive and tougher to shape, It's all done by hand. Omega components are mass produced and 'hand assembled'.
@@patrickbateman529 Rolex’s are not hand shaped. They are totally machined and assembled by hand as well. 904 steel is less corrosive then 316 but it’s softer. 904 handles scratches better but dents easier.
@@patrickbateman529 which world you're living at to know those hilarious informations 😄
@@horologywatchmaking13 Look it up on Google.
Great video man! I was choosing between these exact two watches. I ended up buying the Aqua Terra (38mm blue dial). The main reason tbh was the availability. The whole buying experience was simply better with Omega. I felt like if I was paying this amount of money for a watch I didn't want to end up in some queue and have to wait for months to get what I actually payed for. Anyway, I'm extremely happy with Aqua Terra! Although I don't think you can go wrong with any of these watches.
I WANT to like it, but in person the AT just doesn’t quite sing. Can’t quite put my finger on it. Functionally it needs a thinner case and a more-easily adjustable clasp.
@@whereRbearsTeeth yep, agree the Speedy pro moon watch may be the only exception. Good call.
I have the aqua terra 41mm. Superb watch and a lot of watch for your coin. My only gripe is there's no micro adjustment on the clasp. That's it. Other than that, it's perfect.
I love the aqua terra, I got mine in 2019 as my first ever "proper watch" and find it extremely versatile. It's the perfect watch for me and I still love to wear it!
I've been wearing the AT for over 5 years and it is by far my favourite watch. Just goes with every occasion and never misses a beat.
Nice comparison between the Aquaterra and the Explorer. Both great watches, but for me the AT easily wins for the design and for the movement that is far superior and beautifully decorated.
Both. Both used but mint condition. 39mm aqua terra in grey dial w applied indices. 39mm explorer 214270. Life is good.
Wish people would stop comparing Omega to Rolex when they both have good things and can compliment each other well.
Draws UA-cam hits - so they keep doing it
Agree.
My wife bought me my Aqua Terra 41mm Grey dial/blue hands, for my 60th birthday last year and i could not be happier.
It makes me feel special and i smile every time i took at it.
Happy me!
I love the aqua terra & the fact that i can actually go into a shop, try it on & then actually buy it is a big deal, whereas with the rolex that’s not an option so it gets ruled out. I have a speedy pro and a seamaster pro, so difficult to pull the trigger on the aqua terra. 🤔
@@whereRbearsTeeth You waited for an explorer?
Why?
If you don't already have a Rolex, get the Explorer. If you do then Go Omega. Thet AT on a rubber strap is beautiful.
The 41mm blue AT is as close to being perfect as any watch for me. If I could afford one 🤞 I know I'd neither hesitate or regret it.
I bought one last year. Can confirm it is awesome. Brand new from a dealer for £4,100 which hopefully puts it 20% closer to feeling attainable.
You won't regret it. It is superb.
Before buying, need to factor in the Paul Thorpe Index. i.e. risk of getting mugged and the watch stolen from you.
Guess it depends on your location and lifestyle, but it’s good to think about it.
True story.
In general apart from chronographs, I really don’t like white dials on sports watches.
I agree, these are tool/everyday watches for good people with deep pockets so legibillity should be important. If you see them as luxury watches for the more impecunious I think you're missing the point.
@@marcusrawlinson5024 I don’t, it’s just a matter of taste in my case. A white dial on a dress watch can look elegant. On a sports watch not so much. I couldn’t care less how much or little they might cost.
I’ve just bought an aqua terra blue dial 8900
It is my first high end watch and I spent a lot of time researching different watches
I absolutely love this watch so much so I have ordered the blue alligator strap and the rubber strap and am very pleased to wear this watch every day
Thanks for the video
Talking Seamaster Models: what are your Thoughts on the new Seamaster 300 Models? :) The „vintage“ looking ones 😄
Waiting for a video on this, they look so cool
Love it. Wish it was 40mm or just under. Although who am I kidding, I could never afford one!
Stunning watches, I agree, just making them slightly smaller would be amazing.
Aqua Terra for me thank you, I love the brand, and I need a date complication.
For me, many of Omega’s watches are too thick. The Aquaterra 38mm is 13.2mm thick. That’s dive watch territory. By contrast, the Explorer (14270) is 11mm thick.
couldn't agree more. Even in the diver realm, 13mm is my max. My first decent acquisition was the seamaster 300 pre-coaxial. Still the thinnest diver around ; mines ticking less than +/-0.5s/day and is 20y old.
Pretty sure 13.2mm is the thickness of the 41mm, with the thicker 8900 bawled calibre. The 38mm is 12.5mm thick; still thicker than the Explorer, but not by much (and you get a display caseback and 50m more WR, so I guess it's a trade off).
Adrian, so on your recommendation, I tried Chronext. Bought the Aqua Terra and delighted with the Chronext service. Great recommendation and fantastic watch!
I adore my AT. The incredible rubber strap, good looks, and the hour jump complication (on the 8900 movement/41mm version) make it my default travel watch.
I used to think the same, I even bought it overseas, I too also had the Aqua Terra on a rubber strap, but have just traded it in for a Tudor Pelagos (blue).
I love jump hour movements for travel.
What is your wrist size?
@@gabev6172 16.5cm / ~6.5", and the 41mm AT fits me perfectly. Wrist shape matters though since lug to lug is the real measurement that matters across the span of your wrist.
I like the Aqua terra but I prefer it in the green dial ...it's stunning!
Aquaterra is the more beautiful watch.
I've had my Aqua Tera Black dial 41mm for a year now and I absolutely love it! Like others have commented, a brushed bracelet with a deployant clasp would make it a better everyday watch.
Aqua Terra every day and twice on Sunday. No comparison.
As an owner of the Planet Ocean 8800, I do sometimes consider swapping it for an Aqua Terra, in the interests of having a more "simple" watch, like you mention.
That being said I find the AT slightly too dressy and the PO tends to feel slightly more GADA
Still not sold on a tool watch without a date complication….. Aqua Terra wins hands down over the Rolex…
Now for me i dont like the date complication
@@bgandjsco1 I get that some people have strong views on watches with a date complication, but for me personally and especially if we’re talking “tool” watches, a day to day wear has to show the date….otherwise what’s the point?….
Some people might find date window unnecessary, but I do feel it is much more convenient to have date on watch, it's just easier than get out your phone to check date. The antimagnetic ability of Omega is really awesome, they put this feature on all the omega watches which is just a good job that no other mechanical watch brand does !
Love my grey dial aqua terra with blue accents, bought if from an AD 2 years ago and haven’t taken it off. Such an underrated piece.
Would love to see you do a comparison of the new Tudor black bay ceramic vs the seamaster 300 ceramic 👍🏼
Price has also jumped up by about £900 since then
The aquaterra can go from the beach to the boardroom effortlessly, perfect "one watch" piece IMO. I have the earlier version with the plain sunburst silver dial and polished indices, I wish they still offered plain dial versions in their current line.
I always overlooked the AT, then I saw one in the metal...... What a watch!
I normally prefer a 36mm watch, but I've worn a few 38mm aqua terra's and it fits my 6 1/2 inch wrist amazingly, I definitely recommend the skinny amount us checking it out.
Omega win hands down for most contemporary timepiece
I really like the Omega aqua terra. Date at 6. Arrow on the appropriate hand for use. Colored seconds hand, did i see a blue one ?
Your straightforward delivery has got to be top-notch and among the best in the business. Cheers Adrian and hope for more great content!
I was looking for a datejust and when I was added on a 3 years waiting list, i realised that you can't beat chronext's price on a 41mm AT, black dial, and especially the waiting time. I just love that watch!
I own an AT and an AirKing 2019 model... AT every day.
Love the AirKing, it's often overlooked, which is why I like it.
@@chriszivoder2650 I like the AirKing as well, it's just not as versatile as the AT and the movement is better in the AT. I own several of each brand but prefer Omega for value.
I agree, overall the Aqua Terra is an excellent watch. But I just can’t get past the minutes hand and the date.
Love AT but it needs bracelet with satin brushed finish and clasp with on the fly adjust.
Better on rubber
Completely agree about the price. Aqua terra is amazing, especially with the white dial. Not a fan of the polished centre links and should be priced £3500-£4000 retail I reckon.
I’m afraid it has to be the Rolex explorer in my eyes, it’s so simple and classy.
I used to own one (39, no way I could do the 36) - I think for me, over time, it was more, boring and dull.
@@mkyhou1160 I have a submariner date but I like the under the radar look of the explorer.
@@mkyhou1160 To each his own, Adrian himself has talked enthusiastically about his Explorer and says it's the best watch he owns.
@@patrickbateman529 fair enough. I think it’s a reasonable choice for purists / smaller guys. I have an AK now which is a better fit for me size wise (I have a wrist over 7) and visually is much more interesting in person. If I ever win the lottery or get a big promotion my dream would be a 40mm President (white gold or platinum), sort of this everyday style on steroids. Life’s too short to always be under the radar.
Aqua Terra is great, but the Explorer is the best time only watch. I always looked at the Aqua Terra as the affordable, available alternative to the Explorer. But as soon as you say alternative, what you are really saying is, it's the other one I want. So I stumped up for the Explorer, the AT would not have scratched the itch.
What do you think about the thickness of the Omega compared to the Rolex? What about the bracelet and clasp? I really like the Omega, but the thickness, lack of adjustment, and polished bracelet seem like negatives to me.
I’m waiting patiently for the Explorer, but both beautiful watches
where? they are super easy to find. your AD is fkin with you
I bought my Aqua Terra 8500 41mm 3 years ago, in mint condition for £2200. and it's my favourite watch and sits well on my 7.3 inch wrist.
this Aqua Terra without the date would be perfection in its most pure form
I agree. I would also revert back to the vertical teak pattern of the previous generavtion or maybe with no teak pattern at all, like in the first generation. Then it would be The Watch for me.
DEFINITELY 👍 date windows ruin alot of watches for me I prefer time only. There is the Omega Railmaster that doesn't have a date window
I have a 41mm AT. I paid US$3000 gray-market. It’s a steal at that price.
Great vid Aidrian, I love these match ups! it’s hard not to be biased as I have an Aqua terra blue dial (with the vertical teak effect dial) but....... it’s still definitely the better watch. The explorer is superb and it’s just a case of what takes your fancy. You couldn’t go wrong with either. The Rolex name will get more admirers but does that make a better brand?
I would say that Seamaster Professional 300M previous gen watch is a better buy over any Aqua Terra for versatility, especially in blue, it wears confrontable at 41mm width and circa 13mm thickness, looks great during causal weekend and also discreetly slides under shirt and suit
No mention of the jumping hour on the Omega? Like you, I respect both brands, but it seems value for dollar/pound versus brand cache. Omega for me in this comparison.
I’m saving that point for the next video with the Planet Ocean. It’s a really cool feature.
@@BarkandJack The 38mm ATdoesn't have the jumping hour feature. Only the bigger 41mm does. It is 8800 vs 8900 movements. I would personaly go with the quick-set date instead and the smaller watch. Great video as always, Adrian!
Hi, Thanks for the video. Recently, i just bought an omega Seamaster Aqua terra 30mm face 150M, as i have a small wrist. I wear it every day...
I’m just happy to here you say “Oh-may-guh” instead of “Oh-mee-guh”. 🤣🤣🤣
No.
I really like how the Aqua Terra looks.