This is actually a technique Woohoojin was telling people to do near the end of his Valorant coaching. A smooth motion, fast at the start then slowing it down as you near the target. It's actually insane advice because most people can't aim like Tenz does with the flick then then micro correction.
True, even Konpeki teaches the same thing. I've been improving my bronze ass with aimlabs and death match spams@@Coach_Shotty Combined with Coach Shotty, and Worthy TV , gold is a realistic goal for me now😂 Love you and all these guys and thus channel🎉❤
@@Coach_Shotty it was in one of his VOD reviews....many of his vod reviews...Not sure which with how many he did, so good getting this information out there.
What’s interesting is you can see exactly what you’re talking about in a lot of Aimlabs scenarios if you slow it down to .1, they go fast but before the stop start to decelerate
@@kloric401 I mean maybe but he is a master++ at voltaic in benchmarks and those youtubers are Ascendends who think they understand the game ( if we leave Konpeki out of the room ). Btw. I only mean those who talk that bullshit and Konpeki is good but in the first place he wants to sell his 4 digit coaching programm to noobs so he talks some stuff that sounds smart and reasonable.
honest to god, internet gaslighted me into thinking that flicks are good that i changed from this correct technique to the wrong one XD. I always thought that going smooth like that is bad because i would be too slow
ive also seen a video about underflicking is better than overflicking. and with that and this combined, perfect. with time, you can underflick really close to the target and just micro adjust and youd still have the same distance covered as if you were to flick right on. and practicing that underflick can be hard especially for me who is used to overflicking and adjusting, but this video about thinking of flicks as a slow tracking motion, will help me practice a more controlled and precise aiming manner
good video. i think minigod had said something similar like this a while ago in his newer how to flick video and honestly youre right cause it helped me a lot and after building more speed while staying smooth has made it so i dont have as many shaky landings on close to medium flicks even on a 29 gram mouse on a glass pad. though i will say that for people really far from your crosshair or off your screen, i feel like i have to fast flick and adjust mostly because being smooth there takes too long most of the time
It is usually good to slow down at the end of the "flick" to smoothly transition to the microcorrection. However, in your example of wrong, I think the technique used is exactly what you want to do. The player is off screen, so you cant smoothly aim directly on them. You want to get them into view asap, and flicking to where you think they are is a good start. Smoothly turning would be quite a bit slower afaik.
I agree my example wasn’t the greatest. If I’m being honest IT WAS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE because Almost all of my best clips I was aiming in the way I’m teaching in this video
Thanks man! I would do the two flicks very seperate, with the initial + micro being 2 very distinct movements. A better player than I was watching my vod with me on val and he literally told me that my aiming gave him motion sickness lololol. He told me the exact same thing you said here, combine the motions into 1 motion, slowing down while approaching the target. I've since been trying to override my previous aim habits with it, and let me say, it WORKS. In all of my aimlab tasks I've been trying thid aiming style, and while I was initially worse, it felt like I had finally learned the proper form for a skill. Kind of like learning to type using the home row after only picking and choosing keys for a year. Initially you suck, but after a month or so, you become light years better than before. TlDr: thanks for this vid, it cemented what I'm trying to work on, and I hope you keep pumping out content :)
i get what you mean and the technique you’re referring to is efficient but the bardpill (macro+microflick) is just as effective, most top pros in valorant (besides players who mostly use crosshair placement like yay and a couple others) do macro+micro, it’s the most consistent if anything as long as your micros are trained to that level, implementing that technique efficiently and learning how to micro correctly single handedly made me go from diamond to immortal in one act, it’s a life changer when implemented correctly, unfortunately some people over do the macro to obscene levels but from most players i’ve coached to immo they’ve used that technique and done fairly well, that’s just my personal experience and opinion, but yeah thanks for reading
I agree that both are effective and Ive mentioned it in other videos but there are many ways to the same goal especially when it comes to aim. This video was mostly just to share my method in the hopes that it helps someone!
All pros have really good crosshair placement, the difference between yay was that he took holding fights rather than peeking gunfights, when he did peek an off angle hes had to flick many times. I agree with the macro and micro tho
this technique is pretty much identical to the shimmy technique, which he has a video on it called the "shimmy static tutorial". vt matty himself said there were no problems with the technique itself but if you are not familiar with the bardpill technique before trying to master this technique, you probably won't be able to improve much, since the bardpill technique is the core fundamental for all things related to aim. personally i'd stick to the bardpill method since it's easier to get used to and as long as you practice precise tracking scenarios for microadjustments i don't think the change is necessary.
Flicking all over the place is really a bad habit to have, it makes the targets less visible and forces you to make the shot with a short period of image in your brain instead of constant info of where the targets is going.
I'll be blunt i don't like you're saying. to be clear it's not necessarily what you're saying is wrong but instead how you say it. You demonstrated what is known as the "bardoz" method inside of your first shot that you said was "wrong". The Bardoz method for those who don't know is an inital flick into a micro correction. That isn't wrong it's the most common way to shoot static targets and probably the most accepted by the aim community. I will say you flicked outside of your "controllable speed" which is why your landing was Shakey and why you over flicked... To your credit you were flicking off screen as well which probably contributed to these errors... but your example is nothing more than "skill issue" and has nothing to do with a "Correct vs incorrect" technique. What you're preaching has been known for a while and I'm pretty sure is refereed to as the "Zeeq's method" (don't quote me on this of course as i don't know the technical name) To be clear I'm not mad at you for showing it and yes you may have discovered it yourself subconsciously as it's always good to pass down information to those who are less experienced but it has been known and talked about for a while... minigodcs talks about it in one of his most recent videos and is typically the style of aiming opted for most dynamic situations. You can see MattOW do this inside of his dynamic runs as pacing yourself and aiming "comfortably" becomes more valuable than pushing speed because you risk breaking your hit chain and going on a spree of misses. MattOW also talks about this inside of his dynamic video feel free to go watch (MattyOW ~ rank 1 aim training player holding dozens of WR's) BUT when he plays static he does exactly what you did... stating it was "wrong" is just disingenuous. You can go through hundreds of other top players who aim in this style Tenz being the most notable of course but there are many other immortal, radiant, and pro players that aim this way as well. Both methods are fine and can be practiced to enhance your ability to mouse 1 people and it is 100% too soon to say "one is better than the other" as they both have their place. the way you phrased this.. it'll make people believe they're doing something wrong when in fact they are not... it's too "buy my course" energy instead of seeming like you are genuinely trying your best to give a genuine advice and a good explanation about a recent discovery you've made that's helped you/others. I feel like you need to go further in terms of skill with aim trainers before pumping out lots of advice... Don't get me wrong masters is a great accomplishment but there's so much more to learn as well as roadblocks to work through if you are genuine about it. (of course if you're just in it for the money then who cares masters is good enough to convince people to buy shit i will never hate a bag chaser) I just suggest being more careful with how you phrase advice cuz you can send a lot of people down a rabbit hole that is fruitless or even confused them (especially with your videos getting thousands of views)
Idk, I would have phrased it way differently, I would even look up bardpilling for that when I am back home. But I think you mean more of a transition from flicks to micros, if you look at pro players they still have 2 motions in flicks, and thats consistent, just the transition from the lift off, initial and micro are so smooth. Proceeding that way you have a way better VRT resulting in more consistency. Its a question of tension management not if u flick or track. At least thats what I found over my years, hard flicks like shown in ur clip you showed required a way crazier stopping power caus otherwise it messes with ur VRT too hard, but MBMing should still be fine either way. Now take it with a grain of salt, caus for everything and everyone their is exceptions and there is no objectively right way to do sum that applies to everyone ^^
The bardoz method is mainstream. But I’ve tried them all and this method has worked best for me and I’ve found the most aim trainer to in game conversion doing this!
@@missk1697 most players imo use 60hz also back then. also nowadays skill ceiling has increased. If u have agood duo maybe possible, but as a solo player/solo carry its hard eventhough its possible
Don't do voltaic benchmark myself but I'm 99th+ percentile on most popular static and dyanmic clicking scenarios right now. I'd have to hard disagree with you on this one. The fast flick + microadjust is largely the most agreed upon correct method of aiming by not only top aimers but pros as well. Check out MattyOW's or old Bardoz videos
I’m 99th+ percentile as well and if there is anything I’ve learned, it’s that there are many ways to the same outcome. I have seen the Matty and Bardoz videos. I agree with method by “shimmy” more. Which is the method mentioned in this video.
I've seen the shimmy guide too. I think what I noticed when I watched it was that it was much more focused on the overall idea of fluidity which I agree with, but the conclusion he came to about not flicking is what I feel is wrong. The initial quick flick with speed is really how you make sure you don't get stuck in a "slow motion" run. Matty's vid on fluidity I think covers a good example of the proper combination of both, making sure that you're keeping the fast speed needed between larger movements especially but not getting "stuck" when micro adjusting either.
You're views are sort of but not fully shared by one of the top 1% static players, go watch a video by minigod, he goes in-depth about mastering his flicking technique (comparing it to games asw) in static to get a wr, he uses both bardoz method and the smooth flick's but bardoz is for Long distance flicks and he uses smooth flicks with less tension for closer targets, imo the smaller flicks are comparable to most flicks you do anyways if you have decent crosshair placement
You should absolutely flick but dont overflick, I think thats what you meant to say. I do this myself too, I treat micro adjustment as tracking. And the proper way of flicking is indeed in one motion, but you dont move at a constant speed, you need fast underflick as close to the target as possible in a straight line + a smooth transition of speed into your micro adjust, which is why it looks like in one motion. The reason you are inconsistent at flicking is because youre bad at reading and a failure to read properly before you move your crosshair leads to overflick. Also you have to manage the tension in your arm to make use of the speed and learn how to properly slow it down so that youre smooth enough to micro. Its really good you could bring this to light to anyone that doesnt know this but telling others to flick at a constant speed is not it. And its still called flicking, I dont really know why youre changing its name.
Imo I don't think hes really trying to change the name or Idea of flicking, hes just Introducing his technique to flicking. This reminds me of shimmy's method with a bit of minigod's method. Personally I wouldn't go for something like the BardOZ method which you are describing to an extent and modifying It. But then again If I misunderstood please correct me.
Quite frankly, you're just wrong. Even in some of the demos you showed, you were flicking then micro adjusting. You should watch mattyows video on fluidity and then get back to us, making a better, more well-informed video. Your content is alright(sometimes) in terms of accuracy, but please stop selling your "solutions" or "new discoveries" as a one-stop shop to fix peoples problems.
Not saying bardpill or a singular flick is the singular correct answer. minigod also has a good video on that. If you look at it, I believe his second most recent it talks about when one should be used over the other.
Lol. In aim, like many other things there are many ways to the same outcome and I’m not selling this as the end all be all method I’m just giving this as my method. Any phrasing used in this video is purely because this is UA-cam.
@ryanbrown5141 seen em all brother. This method is what has worked best for me. This method is close to a method promoted by “shimmy” and his video is in my description if you’d like to check it out. I see that some people may misunderstand what I meant though, I’m not saying don’t flick im saying flick in a different way where the classic 2 flicks are more of one combined flick
@@Coach_Shotty i know you just 1. marketed it wrong. your explaination was bad, its called fluidity not "imitating tracking or a single flicking motion" and the technique described is still an initial flick and then a micro correction it just has a more seemless transition, hence the term "fluidity". 2. trying to sell the one stop shop of "solutions", as apposed to educating the correct points. 3. not saying it doesnt work but at moments you were just half right for the wrong reasons
The Minecraft background music made my brain go brrrr. Lol I love yall and hope you enjoyed the video!
This is actually a technique Woohoojin was telling people to do near the end of his Valorant coaching. A smooth motion, fast at the start then slowing it down as you near the target. It's actually insane advice because most people can't aim like Tenz does with the flick then then micro correction.
Wow I guess I missed those videos I never knew he actually taught the same thing!
True, even Konpeki teaches the same thing. I've been improving my bronze ass with aimlabs and death match spams@@Coach_Shotty
Combined with Coach Shotty, and Worthy TV , gold is a realistic goal for me now😂
Love you and all these guys and thus channel🎉❤
@@Coach_Shotty it was in one of his VOD reviews....many of his vod reviews...Not sure which with how many he did, so good getting this information out there.
@@Coach_Shotty bard pill, static dots method
@@josephespino7014watch a video by csgod about bardpill and etc its a more newer method for static
Another useful video
1. Offline life
2. Tension on mouse
3. Stay hydrated
4. Setup matters
5. Play dmart
6. All in one flicks
What’s interesting is you can see exactly what you’re talking about in a lot of Aimlabs scenarios if you slow it down to .1, they go fast but before the stop start to decelerate
This actually changes everything. That makes nearly every Valorant-Coaching-UA-camr untrustworthy.
i mean maybe but he has 6k
@@kloric401 I mean maybe but he is a master++ at voltaic in benchmarks and those youtubers are Ascendends who think they understand the game ( if we leave Konpeki out of the room ). Btw. I only mean those who talk that bullshit and Konpeki is good but in the first place he wants to sell his 4 digit coaching programm to noobs so he talks some stuff that sounds smart and reasonable.
honest to god, internet gaslighted me into thinking that flicks are good that i changed from this correct technique to the wrong one XD. I always thought that going smooth like that is bad because i would be too slow
ive also seen a video about underflicking is better than overflicking. and with that and this combined, perfect.
with time, you can underflick really close to the target and just micro adjust and youd still have the same distance covered as if you were to flick right on. and practicing that underflick can be hard especially for me who is used to overflicking and adjusting, but this video about thinking of flicks as a slow tracking motion, will help me practice a more controlled and precise aiming manner
The yapping man is back ( still loving the content man keep up the good work )
good video. i think minigod had said something similar like this a while ago in his newer how to flick video and honestly youre right cause it helped me a lot and after building more speed while staying smooth has made it so i dont have as many shaky landings on close to medium flicks even on a 29 gram mouse on a glass pad. though i will say that for people really far from your crosshair or off your screen, i feel like i have to fast flick and adjust mostly because being smooth there takes too long most of the time
Completely agree
It is usually good to slow down at the end of the "flick" to smoothly transition to the microcorrection. However, in your example of wrong, I think the technique used is exactly what you want to do. The player is off screen, so you cant smoothly aim directly on them. You want to get them into view asap, and flicking to where you think they are is a good start. Smoothly turning would be quite a bit slower afaik.
I agree my example wasn’t the greatest. If I’m being honest IT WAS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE because Almost all of my best clips I was aiming in the way I’m teaching in this video
Treat every flick as if it’s a cluster of shots
0:33 feenicks was in invincible💀
Bro that in a ranked match would make me uninstall
Thanks man! I would do the two flicks very seperate, with the initial + micro being 2 very distinct movements. A better player than I was watching my vod with me on val and he literally told me that my aiming gave him motion sickness lololol. He told me the exact same thing you said here, combine the motions into 1 motion, slowing down while approaching the target. I've since been trying to override my previous aim habits with it, and let me say, it WORKS. In all of my aimlab tasks I've been trying thid aiming style, and while I was initially worse, it felt like I had finally learned the proper form for a skill. Kind of like learning to type using the home row after only picking and choosing keys for a year. Initially you suck, but after a month or so, you become light years better than before.
TlDr: thanks for this vid, it cemented what I'm trying to work on, and I hope you keep pumping out content :)
Please watch minigods video about flicking👍 sometimes you still need to do your original flicking method
i get what you mean and the technique you’re referring to is efficient but the bardpill (macro+microflick) is just as effective, most top pros in valorant (besides players who mostly use crosshair placement like yay and a couple others) do macro+micro, it’s the most consistent if anything as long as your micros are trained to that level, implementing that technique efficiently and learning how to micro correctly single handedly made me go from diamond to immortal in one act, it’s a life changer when implemented correctly, unfortunately some people over do the macro to obscene levels but from most players i’ve coached to immo they’ve used that technique and done fairly well, that’s just my personal experience and opinion, but yeah thanks for reading
I agree that both are effective and Ive mentioned it in other videos but there are many ways to the same goal especially when it comes to aim. This video was mostly just to share my method in the hopes that it helps someone!
@ i understand that and respect that you see the value in both methods, thanks for the reply❤️🫡
All pros have really good crosshair placement, the difference between yay was that he took holding fights rather than peeking gunfights, when he did peek an off angle hes had to flick many times. I agree with the macro and micro tho
this technique is pretty much identical to the shimmy technique, which he has a video on it called the "shimmy static tutorial". vt matty himself said there were no problems with the technique itself but if you are not familiar with the bardpill technique before trying to master this technique, you probably won't be able to improve much, since the bardpill technique is the core fundamental for all things related to aim. personally i'd stick to the bardpill method since it's easier to get used to and as long as you practice precise tracking scenarios for microadjustments i don't think the change is necessary.
@@tehchonka5031 agreed, that’s the long and short of what i was trying to get across
Flicking all over the place is really a bad habit to have, it makes the targets less visible and forces you to make the shot with a short period of image in your brain instead of constant info of where the targets is going.
When I do that, im headshotten in the mean time. But its definitely less stressful. Ill try it... (stuck low elo guy)😅
I'll be blunt i don't like you're saying. to be clear it's not necessarily what you're saying is wrong but instead how you say it.
You demonstrated what is known as the "bardoz" method inside of your first shot that you said was "wrong". The Bardoz method for those who don't know is an inital flick into a micro correction. That isn't wrong it's the most common way to shoot static targets and probably the most accepted by the aim community. I will say you flicked outside of your "controllable speed" which is why your landing was Shakey and why you over flicked... To your credit you were flicking off screen as well which probably contributed to these errors... but your example is nothing more than "skill issue" and has nothing to do with a "Correct vs incorrect" technique. What you're preaching has been known for a while and I'm pretty sure is refereed to as the "Zeeq's method" (don't quote me on this of course as i don't know the technical name) To be clear I'm not mad at you for showing it and yes you may have discovered it yourself subconsciously as it's always good to pass down information to those who are less experienced but it has been known and talked about for a while...
minigodcs talks about it in one of his most recent videos and is typically the style of aiming opted for most dynamic situations. You can see MattOW do this inside of his dynamic runs as pacing yourself and aiming "comfortably" becomes more valuable than pushing speed because you risk breaking your hit chain and going on a spree of misses. MattOW also talks about this inside of his dynamic video feel free to go watch (MattyOW ~ rank 1 aim training player holding dozens of WR's) BUT when he plays static he does exactly what you did... stating it was "wrong" is just disingenuous. You can go through hundreds of other top players who aim in this style Tenz being the most notable of course but there are many other immortal, radiant, and pro players that aim this way as well.
Both methods are fine and can be practiced to enhance your ability to mouse 1 people and it is 100% too soon to say "one is better than the other" as they both have their place. the way you phrased this.. it'll make people believe they're doing something wrong when in fact they are not... it's too "buy my course" energy instead of seeming like you are genuinely trying your best to give a genuine advice and a good explanation about a recent discovery you've made that's helped you/others. I feel like you need to go further in terms of skill with aim trainers before pumping out lots of advice... Don't get me wrong masters is a great accomplishment but there's so much more to learn as well as roadblocks to work through if you are genuine about it. (of course if you're just in it for the money then who cares masters is good enough to convince people to buy shit i will never hate a bag chaser)
I just suggest being more careful with how you phrase advice cuz you can send a lot of people down a rabbit hole that is fruitless or even confused them (especially with your videos getting thousands of views)
:3
Idk, I would have phrased it way differently, I would even look up bardpilling for that when I am back home. But I think you mean more of a transition from flicks to micros, if you look at pro players they still have 2 motions in flicks, and thats consistent, just the transition from the lift off, initial and micro are so smooth. Proceeding that way you have a way better VRT resulting in more consistency. Its a question of tension management not if u flick or track. At least thats what I found over my years, hard flicks like shown in ur clip you showed required a way crazier stopping power caus otherwise it messes with ur VRT too hard, but MBMing should still be fine either way. Now take it with a grain of salt, caus for everything and everyone their is exceptions and there is no objectively right way to do sum that applies to everyone ^^
Bro made a video on underflicking
I do this and I suck lol
what was the kovaak training that u used in the video
what is that green crosshair need to know the exact stats i wanna use it on console
bro just yapped 5 minutes for saying play pokeball
but isnt the bardoz method mainstream?
The bardoz method is mainstream. But I’ve tried them all and this method has worked best for me and I’ve found the most aim trainer to in game conversion doing this!
At least give shimmy or zeonlo credit for this approach.
Not sure who Zeonlo is but true I forgot to add shimmy’s video to the description
yap about hz monitor pls. how to win against player with higher refresh rate monitor. can u get radiant with 144hz
Back in the days pros were still pros with just 60hz. You can absolutely manage with 144hz.
You can definitely hit radiant with 144hz
@@missk1697 most players imo use 60hz also back then. also nowadays skill ceiling has increased. If u have agood duo maybe possible, but as a solo player/solo carry its hard eventhough its possible
Bruh u can def get radiant on 144hz, especially if you have constant fps/ping
@@zenjch what i mean by that is a radiant that solo carrying every single game. Not a boosted radiant with good duo and low kda
lol i know ppl flexing aimlab scores and playin deathmatch all day to stay stuck in gold
It's way more rare to do all of that and still be in golds, desthmatches can easily take you up to diamond
Don't do voltaic benchmark myself but I'm 99th+ percentile on most popular static and dyanmic clicking scenarios right now. I'd have to hard disagree with you on this one. The fast flick + microadjust is largely the most agreed upon correct method of aiming by not only top aimers but pros as well. Check out MattyOW's or old Bardoz videos
I’m 99th+ percentile as well and if there is anything I’ve learned, it’s that there are many ways to the same outcome. I have seen the Matty and Bardoz videos. I agree with method by “shimmy” more. Which is the method mentioned in this video.
I've seen the shimmy guide too. I think what I noticed when I watched it was that it was much more focused on the overall idea of fluidity which I agree with, but the conclusion he came to about not flicking is what I feel is wrong. The initial quick flick with speed is really how you make sure you don't get stuck in a "slow motion" run. Matty's vid on fluidity I think covers a good example of the proper combination of both, making sure that you're keeping the fast speed needed between larger movements especially but not getting "stuck" when micro adjusting either.
Well like I said, There are many ways to the same outcome. This video was just to share my method.
@@GinkaBESTWWminigods video goes in-depth about this specific thing, you should watch that too
❤
You're views are sort of but not fully shared by one of the top 1% static players, go watch a video by minigod, he goes in-depth about mastering his flicking technique (comparing it to games asw) in static to get a wr, he uses both bardoz method and the smooth flick's but bardoz is for Long distance flicks and he uses smooth flicks with less tension for closer targets, imo the smaller flicks are comparable to most flicks you do anyways if you have decent crosshair placement
yay
im hearing you on how to do it, but amm im thinking is aim assist
why is your game in german?
Lol Alot of my gameplay is from a friend and he is German
You should absolutely flick but dont overflick, I think thats what you meant to say. I do this myself too, I treat micro adjustment as tracking. And the proper way of flicking is indeed in one motion, but you dont move at a constant speed, you need fast underflick as close to the target as possible in a straight line + a smooth transition of speed into your micro adjust, which is why it looks like in one motion. The reason you are inconsistent at flicking is because youre bad at reading and a failure to read properly before you move your crosshair leads to overflick. Also you have to manage the tension in your arm to make use of the speed and learn how to properly slow it down so that youre smooth enough to micro. Its really good you could bring this to light to anyone that doesnt know this but telling others to flick at a constant speed is not it. And its still called flicking, I dont really know why youre changing its name.
Imo I don't think hes really trying to change the name or Idea of flicking, hes just Introducing his technique to flicking.
This reminds me of shimmy's method with a bit of minigod's method.
Personally I wouldn't go for something like the BardOZ method which you are describing to an extent and modifying It.
But then again If I misunderstood please correct me.
Quite frankly, you're just wrong. Even in some of the demos you showed, you were flicking then micro adjusting. You should watch mattyows video on fluidity and then get back to us, making a better, more well-informed video.
Your content is alright(sometimes) in terms of accuracy, but please stop selling your "solutions" or "new discoveries" as a one-stop shop to fix peoples problems.
Not saying bardpill or a singular flick is the singular correct answer. minigod also has a good video on that. If you look at it, I believe his second most recent it talks about when one should be used over the other.
Lol. In aim, like many other things there are many ways to the same outcome and I’m not selling this as the end all be all method I’m just giving this as my method. Any phrasing used in this video is purely because this is UA-cam.
@Coach_Shotty Well, either way, you seriously should check those aforementioned videos. Get your bag.
@ryanbrown5141 seen em all brother. This method is what has worked best for me. This method is close to a method promoted by “shimmy” and his video is in my description if you’d like to check it out. I see that some people may misunderstand what I meant though, I’m not saying don’t flick im saying flick in a different way where the classic 2 flicks are more of one combined flick
@@Coach_Shotty i know you just
1. marketed it wrong. your explaination was bad, its called fluidity not "imitating tracking or a single flicking motion" and the technique described is still an initial flick and then a micro correction it just has a more seemless transition, hence the term "fluidity".
2. trying to sell the one stop shop of "solutions", as apposed to educating the correct points.
3. not saying it doesnt work but at moments you were just half right for the wrong reasons