The Canon EF 24-70mm F/2.8L II USM Lens Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @marcusoutdoors4999
    @marcusoutdoors4999 3 роки тому +1

    Not seen any of your videos for a while, I liked the crisp straightforward delivery, also the first sample shot was a stunner, demonstrating the lens and your abilities. I do still reference your tutorials on colour grading, using photoshops selective colour adjustments (a particularly useful video). Good advice on the use of this kind of lens for those of us not on Canon.

  • @Schattex.
    @Schattex. 2 роки тому +2

    Yo wtf. Am I the only one that got an ad for the sigma 24-70mm when watching this video? 😂 he just stopped talking at 7:33 and the ad started running and I thought it was part of the video 😂

  • @THSimagery
    @THSimagery 2 роки тому

    Your lighting is Immaculate. That’s the real MVP of this tutorial… 😂

  • @anoopchaudhary8732
    @anoopchaudhary8732 2 роки тому +5

    Very nice video, I am using r6 and looking to sell my 24-105 rf f4 usm l lens and buy ef 24-70 f2.8 just because of extra stop of light and I fell it might be sharper. Any advise will be helpful thanks

  • @garyrowe58
    @garyrowe58 Рік тому +4

    I find it odd that there is no mention of the difference in sharpness between a) the f/2.8 Mk II vs the f/4, and then b) vs the Sigma. The choice isn't only about f/2.8 vs f/4 or Yes / No to IS.
    For me it's about the sharpness, and sadly the other two don't match the f/2.8. Why do you think Canon can *still* sell it for so much?

    • @TheFirstRealChewy
      @TheFirstRealChewy 6 місяців тому

      The image quality is the main reason I'm considering this lens over the Sigma.

  • @Fifthimagez
    @Fifthimagez 2 роки тому +1

    Great video I really want this lens but I’m not sure if I should go EF or RF I’m a prime shooters so this will be my first zoom.

  • @innakramareva8137
    @innakramareva8137 2 роки тому +1

    Is this lens good for wedding photography. I just bought this lens to shoot weddings and family photography.

    • @THSimagery
      @THSimagery 2 роки тому +2

      I would argue that it’s all you need… maybe a 135 prime for a cheap lens with reach. Or a 70-200 1. You can find them used for roughly the same price.

  • @marckristensen946
    @marckristensen946 4 місяці тому +1

    Not really impressed with the sharpness and image quality of those pictures. Not for that price anyway. And I've never understood why such a great lens manufacturer don't make that one with IS. I have a basic 18-135 mm, which isn't great at all, and even that comes with IS.

  • @BWWGL9
    @BWWGL9 2 роки тому

    I have a Canon 90D it's APS-C I think 1.6,,, would the Canon 24-70mm F2.8 II be a good lens choice for various applications? Let me know,,, Appreciate your video!

    • @wsh81
      @wsh81 2 роки тому +1

      Good lens with 90d. You can get a full frame effect with a Metabones Speedbooster. Research it

    • @kingdeadshoot6019
      @kingdeadshoot6019 2 роки тому +1

      @@wsh81 with the money you spend on the metabones you can ad some money and get a FF

  • @PlasticEater14
    @PlasticEater14 Рік тому

    at 11:34 you stated that there are lens like this for only half the price, What lens would you recommend?

  • @ryzenbiel4145
    @ryzenbiel4145 2 роки тому

    which is better than sigma??

  • @christianmbabazi9722
    @christianmbabazi9722 Рік тому +2

    Is there any difference between the Mark 1 and the Mark II?

  • @Northern_Rockhopper
    @Northern_Rockhopper 2 роки тому

    Does this work on the 250d?

  • @michaelt2842
    @michaelt2842 Рік тому

    This is the everyday workhorse lens for a photojournalist. Not really so hot for a hobbyist like this.

  • @PIXELvoiz
    @PIXELvoiz 3 роки тому

    Awesome 👌