History of Narendra Modi

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • Check out my podcast, Power Law, on:
    -Apple: podcasts.apple...
    -Google: podcasts.googl...
    -Spotify: open.spotify.c...
    Join my Discord here: / discord
    Enter your email here: johncoogan.com
    ABOUT JOHN COOGAN:
    I am the co-founder of soylent.com and lucy.co, both of which were funded by Y Combinator (Summer 2012 and Winter 2018).
    I've been an entrepreneur for the last decade across multiple companies. I've done a lot of work in Silicon Valley, so that's mostly what I talk about. I've raised over 10 rounds of venture capital totaling over $100m in funding.
    I work mostly in tech-enabled consumer packaged goods, meaning I use software to make the best products possible
    CONTACT:
    You can get in touch with me via Twitter: / johncoogan
    Disclaimer: This video is purely my opinion and should not be regarded as a primary source. I am not a financial advisor and this is not a recommendation to buy or sell securities. Always do your own due diligence.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @JohnCooganPlus
    @JohnCooganPlus  11 місяців тому +64

    Excited to learn more about India and Narendra Modi, please post your feedback and thoughts about what could be better in this story below! Here are some of my sources if you want to dig deeper! Apologies about anything I missed!
    www.cfr.org/in-brief/china-india-border-dispute-what-know
    www.foreignaffairs.com/india/folly-indias-neutrality
    foreignpolicy.com/2022/02/04/modi-india-china-pakistan-geopolitics/
    claremontreviewofbooks.com/indias-uprising/?
    www.economist.com/leaders/2023/06/15/joe-biden-and-narendra-modi-are-drawing-their-countries-closer
    www.economist.com/asia/2023/06/13/america-is-courting-india-in-part-for-its-growing-economic-clout
    www.economist.com/asia/2023/06/15/narendra-modi-is-the-worlds-most-popular-leader
    www.economist.com/asia/2023/06/15/indias-foreign-minister-on-ties-with-america-china-and-russia
    www.economist.com/asia/2023/04/13/narendra-modi-is-rewriting-indian-history
    www.economist.com/asia/2023/02/16/after-silencing-critics-at-home-narendra-modi-goes-after-foreign-media
    www.economist.com/asia/2022/12/01/narendra-modi-is-about-to-fulfil-a-core-promise-to-hindus
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narendra_Modi

    • @ranadeepjash1150
      @ranadeepjash1150 11 місяців тому +42

      No this video is for how to not know indian society and its democracy. This video is the result of doing research from BBC , al jajira without even setting foot on indian soil. One recommendation do both side research before jumping on to the conclusion. By the way am not hindu.

    • @threlonmusketeers9371
      @threlonmusketeers9371 11 місяців тому +15

      Google why Indira Gandhi is a Gandhi. She married someone with a Muslim name so OG Gandhi gave that guy his surname. Go figure why..

    • @ranadeepjash1150
      @ranadeepjash1150 11 місяців тому +6

      @@threlonmusketeers9371 no goggles don't always show right result. That's why i am telling authors of this video to do actually research. Indira Gandhi was married to Firoj Gandhi an parsi and not Muslim. In case of india their is always lot of miss information in western media and fed by both indian extremely left wing intellectual or some extremely right wing intellectual. But the actual truth is neither and seat between two extreme.

    • @bharatbhandari8825
      @bharatbhandari8825 11 місяців тому +5

      Modi is tiger 😂

    • @jameammarijr.2248
      @jameammarijr.2248 11 місяців тому +10

      you delibarately missed the Godhra train burning, bastardulliah

  • @riderchallenge4250
    @riderchallenge4250 11 місяців тому +1093

    what Modi is doing is preserving the native religions of the India which is not wrong at all. Hindus, Jains and Sikhs have no other place other than India.
    Edit- Jains added

    • @codejunkes4607
      @codejunkes4607 11 місяців тому

      Modi is the Edogan of India, a politician from a banned religious organization now ruling the country and destroying its founder's hard work to modernise the country by ensuring scientific thinking and rationalism among its population.
      Going against Science will always take you down! Our achievements are done by people who have studied in the Congress era. Even Vajpayee's policies are not much different than Nehru's regarding science education and research, and they never put propaganda against science.

    • @leisurejain7835
      @leisurejain7835 11 місяців тому +86

      This is the truth.

    • @Zheronic
      @Zheronic 11 місяців тому +40

      Preserving a native religion has no connection with murdering and oppressing thousands of other religions. It does not justify what he did do and is doing. To add one, he only sees Hinduism as the supreme religion, oppressing thousands of sikhs along side Muslims in india.

    • @akashsahoo7376
      @akashsahoo7376 11 місяців тому +125

      @@Zheronic How he is murdering and oppresing please enlighten me. Where did you get your info and facts.

    • @ishan_9001
      @ishan_9001 11 місяців тому +64

      ​@@Zheronicyou kill others in your country so it does not mean we will do so 😂😂😂

  • @desidark1243
    @desidark1243 11 місяців тому +533

    The sovereign socialist secular bit was added unilaterally and illegally by Indira Gandhi without the consent or due process of legislative work

    • @manh9105
      @manh9105 11 місяців тому +49

      when India was under emergency. India's real constitution never had secular, socialist words

    • @AtheistNationalist
      @AtheistNationalist 11 місяців тому +23

      Yep. But you're wrong about "sovereign". It was there from the beginning. The other 2 was added during Indira Dictatotship (emergency)

    • @crissmuzik1024
      @crissmuzik1024 11 місяців тому +3

      SOVEREIGN AND SECULAR WAS THERE BEFORE .

    • @wildrumours8337
      @wildrumours8337 11 місяців тому +27

      @@crissmuzik1024 secular and socialist words are added by 42nd Constitutional amendment act...it was not present original

    • @prakyathkumar8618
      @prakyathkumar8618 11 місяців тому +7

      ​@@crissmuzik1024yeah it was just playing hide and seek

  • @imbikramsaha
    @imbikramsaha 11 місяців тому +42

    Christian Nationalists Country: Good 🇺🇸
    Islamic Nationalists Country: Good 🇵🇰
    Jewish Nationalists Country: Good🇮🇱
    Hindu Nationalists Country: Bad 🇮🇳
    Western hypocrisy : ☕️☕️☕️☕️

    • @reagan_pereira_
      @reagan_pereira_ 5 місяців тому

      Nope. All nationalist governments are bad. Stop strawmanning a leftist argument so that you can cry about how you’re being targeted

    • @johnchrist-cn8ql
      @johnchrist-cn8ql 2 місяці тому

      UK is a Christian Country

  • @ishikinokami1575
    @ishikinokami1575 11 місяців тому +95

    Once again,half assed info on Kashmir.
    Without any mention of the ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Hindus by the Pakistani govt,taking away autonomy of Kashmir doesn't make sense. Also,refuge is given ONLY to persecuted ethnic groups. Jews from Germany were given refuge in western countries. Not the majority Christians. Why? Because they were never persecuted there. Similarly,the Islamic Republic of Pakistan persecuted the non muslims,and hence, citizenship was given ONLY to them.

  • @theriam6281
    @theriam6281 11 місяців тому +603

    When you create a video on India without reading any Indian sources and your only sources are BBC amd NYT. You end up with a video which is as far as it gets from the reality of India.

    • @RahulSharma-ry2pg
      @RahulSharma-ry2pg 11 місяців тому +20

      Well said

    • @st_prashant_jung_shumsher_rana
      @st_prashant_jung_shumsher_rana 11 місяців тому +14

      BJP IT cell defending their supreme leader at its best 😂

    • @pratulyaramprasad7435
      @pratulyaramprasad7435 11 місяців тому +42

      Being in the US, I can testify how biased the news channels are here with regards to India. So this a very valid point.

    • @deepanshu00730
      @deepanshu00730 11 місяців тому +27

      @@st_prashant_jung_shumsher_rana Aur you are brainwashed.

    • @aahavyadav1119
      @aahavyadav1119 11 місяців тому +16

      @@st_prashant_jung_shumsher_rana or its a civilian who is a bjp supporter. Indians like the party with 303 seats, how crazy😱😱😱😱

  • @desidark1243
    @desidark1243 11 місяців тому +636

    Godse was not a member of the RSS when he killed Gandhi. Specifically, he split from the RSS and joined the Mahayana BECAUSE he was disillusioned with their lack of action.

    • @krishanSharma.69.69f
      @krishanSharma.69.69f 11 місяців тому +6

      He followed the ideology.

    • @AtheistNationalist
      @AtheistNationalist 11 місяців тому +29

      @@krishanSharma.69.69f BJP minster Jaishankar recently unveiled a Gandhi statue in Vietnam to symbolize Indo-vietnamese friendship. Take your taqqiya elsewhere

    • @roshanprasad3330
      @roshanprasad3330 11 місяців тому +16

      @@krishanSharma.69.69f And what is that ideology? If this so called mahatma had his way, we could have seen a corridor running from Pakistan to Bangladesh. And Godseji made sure Bharat remains intact.

    • @krishanSharma.69.69f
      @krishanSharma.69.69f 11 місяців тому +1

      @WojtekDaBear2005 That's called diplomacy. Using dead people's name, just for making his believer feels secure.

    • @krishanSharma.69.69f
      @krishanSharma.69.69f 11 місяців тому

      @roshanprasad3330 Pakistan formation was a good idea. Otherwise whole Bharat would have been a muslim state. Pakistan was rich at that time. They could have easily trapped us.
      Trust me. The gandhi you people hate has just paved our way for hindurashtra.
      Today muslims are a minority in Bharat but include Pakistan and bangladesh and hindus become a minority. And on top of that lower caste shudras and untouchables together would have destroyed that nation.
      Think deep before you say something.
      Gandhi was a smart fellow. He even tried to control the so called dalits.And those dumb people are still falling prey to others.

  • @tivo3720
    @tivo3720 11 місяців тому +447

    Its our land our temples our culture our tradition our country.....why we would hold our right?! India is secular bcz of the Hindus not bcz of others.

    • @darshmishra2207
      @darshmishra2207 10 місяців тому +2

      According to your perspective, individuals from other countries may not be permitted to express opinions on matters within your country. If this assertion holds true, then perhaps as Hindus in India, we should refrain from raising concerns about the treatment of the Hindu minority in Pakistan by Pakistani Muslims. Additionally, considering this principle, one might argue against granting any rights to hindu people from the country in the Middle East, especially Israel, as it is the birthplace of various Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Islam, Judaism). The concept of "our land" becomes complex, given historical inaction during the British Raj, and there's a suggestion that the claim to the land might be stronger for South Indians, considering the Aryan migration from the north. Although personally aligned with the BJP, I disapprove of Modi's actions in Gujarat. While the constitution promotes equality, there's a palpable sentiment of animosity towards Muslims among the common populace, fueled by the Hindutva narrative. Acknowledging the challenges posed by certain Muslim actions, the solution doesn't lie in adopting a similarly divisive stance with fervent religious beliefs.

    • @thesentry1434
      @thesentry1434 10 місяців тому +8

      ​@@darshmishra2207you are living in confusion with so many misconceptions

    • @speakwithfacts1
      @speakwithfacts1 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@darshmishra2207talk with facts not ur propaganda

    • @williamflynn7527
      @williamflynn7527 8 місяців тому

      @@speakwithfacts1 Didn't know India has their own equivalent of MAGAs. Everything you disagree with is propaganda, hey?

    • @ashok7946
      @ashok7946 5 місяців тому

      ​@@thesentry1434we will see about that

  • @prayagjoshi1179
    @prayagjoshi1179 11 місяців тому +537

    Hindus of India don't want any special treatment , just equal treatment. The predecessor to Modi Dr. Manmohan Singh once said when still Prime Minister that Muslims of India have first right to India's resources . Many such instances and govt schemes were made explicitly for benefit of Muslims. In india , temples are under govt control and have to pay taxes but Mosques , Churches aren't under govt control and are exempted on paying any taxes . Many more laws or schemes exist for muslims . So this argument doesn't hold any ground that Hindus want special treatment .

    • @siddharthkumar6345
      @siddharthkumar6345 11 місяців тому +71

      U can add waqf board act to your list too

    • @sarthakgothalyan8952
      @sarthakgothalyan8952 11 місяців тому +16

      You have falsely stated manmohan singhs speech about muslims having first right to benefit. The first right was for minorities and poor people which you can find the clip on youtube. You are purposely trying to fear monger hindus and drive them against our indian brothers shame on you

    • @manh9105
      @manh9105 11 місяців тому +43

      @@sarthakgothalyan8952 so who are minorities in India , aren't muslims and christian officially categorised as minorities in India? And do you think India belongs to Manmohan's or Congress's dad to give to minorities ???

    • @rishkebab5092
      @rishkebab5092 11 місяців тому +5

      @@manh9105 What's wrong with looking after the minorities? Majorities get default special treatment so you need to give some sort of boost to minorities so that they do not fall behind. It's basic society, almost every country does this.

    • @AtheistNationalist
      @AtheistNationalist 11 місяців тому +38

      @@sarthakgothalyan8952 Kindly see the whole speech. The original speech is still there on UA-cam. He specifically told Muslims and minorities. I can agree with the "poor people" part but why the minority part?! A minority which can divide a nation and creat 2 countries (Pakistan and Bangladesh) for themselves is NOT a minority. Say NO to minority appeasement. Don't play the victim card here. Why minorities should be given special treatment is a democracy where everyone is equal? Why must a particular religious minority be given special treatment when the Constitution explicitly states that our country is secular?!

  • @y.u.so.
    @y.u.so. 11 місяців тому +214

    This is why a westerners should not make videos on Indian Politics, the facts are summarized in a one-sided way. No proper explanation from perspective of a common man. It is like Indians making videos with title "how Europe is embracing its Nazi past" due to raise of right-wing parties.
    1. There are over 30+ Muslim Political Parties in India. Why don't they come forward to teach Hindus how to be secular and open minded?
    I challenge every single Muslim party in India, make an openly Gay/Lesbian party president or a Transgender as a party candidate for Chief Minister/Prime Minister. Your maniesto should contain Climate change, Gender equality, and No caste in Muslim community.
    Can you?
    2. Congress and its allies, like any other party in India wants to be in Power. The way they managed to do it after 1971 is to split Hindus based on caste. Caste is still used as a weapon for vote with a promise of goodies. Even today, the parties use caste divide to harness votes.
    Modi is the only leader in India who managed to bridge the differences amongst Hindus and work towards making India a developed nation, for every Indian citizen.
    Of course, the way he chose to do it is questionable. But is the media in the west free? Look at today's war in Israel, no one talks about the Palestine cause before Hamas attacked and the reason Hamas managed to gain power. (Hamas is a TERROSRIST group, I don't support those swines.) Similarly, the war in Ukraine, Russian media are completely banned in Europe. Snowdown and Julian Assange are in jail, where is freedom of expression? You will find plenty of such contradictions in Western democracies.
    Modi's policies have been collectively good for India as a society, this includes Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, etc. alike. Doesn't matter if you believe in aliens, you can use UPI. You can take the same highways as the cow worshipper while being a worshipper of "one true" God. If you are Indian, you are evacuated from a war zone without questioning your faith or beliefs. Our foreign policy is stronger and more vocal. Congress too was, but not as good as the current ones.
    Governance works, it doesn't matter who you are. India still is a democracy, a vibrant one.
    3. Hindus are the only religious group in India, who are open minded, they have issues and problems in the social system, but they are evolving, they accept reforms, they accept the new laws governing them. The majority of Hindus do not go to the temple once a month, they visit occasionally during festivals. If you google, you'll find Gay/Lesbian Hindu weddings, show me one from Islam. This is the sign that Hindus are changing according to their perception of the world around them and embracing the change positively.
    For the Westerners, the best example is Denmark. The majority of Danes are Christian/atheist. When they realized that their way of life and social norms are getting out of hand due to changing culture of Danish society, due to mass immigration in the name of refuge, they changed the law decreasing the amount of Immigration in the name of REFUGEE.
    Similarly, Hindus believed that every other faith would accept them as fellow Indians and not judge for their faith. After all they are the same people, who have languages and roots of the same or similar tree. That is not the case, American and European Christians are funding mass conversions in the country. Same is with the Wahabi Islamic funds coming from Saudi. The non-Hindu faiths don't just demean Hindus for their way of life, but also don't feel pride about Indian arts and culture associated with Hinduism like dance forms, classical music, and folk arts. I remember my Christian friend not accepting to visit an ancient Hindu Temple because it was against her Christian Faith. So appreciating ancient architecture is now based on faith?
    This is the reason; Hindus today are more turning towards the Hindu Nationalist parties. European parties like Fratelli D'Italia, Perus Suomalaiset, Sweden Democrats, Alternative für Deutschland, and Republican party of USA, etc. are some examples. Did white Christians suddenly become Nazis? No, but they are worried about the identity crisis in their country.
    They guys who broke away from India, Pakistan has been going through an identity crisis. They call themselves decent of Arabs one morning and the next day lineage of Turks. This is also the case of Indian Muslims. They don't accept thier Indianness.
    Indians, doesn't matter who and what they believe, be it Monkey God or Bread/Wine maker or a Guy who married a 9-year-old, they should appreciate, nurture, and embrace the positive ideals of India. This can be art forms, dressing, music, literature, language, dances etc. which originated or evolved in India. This is how Indian Identity is preserved, which is diverse and unique.
    This divide amongst Indians where the reason British were able to exploit and rule India for 300 years. And today the Christian, Sikh and Muslim organizations outside India use it for their benefits whatever it is. Look around India, Saudi/Qatar/Iran directly or indirectly controls every Muslim country. Apart from Indonesia, every other Muslim majority country have ridiculous norms dating back to origin of Islam and it is being planted by religious radicals of oil rich middle east.
    I am a Hindu by birth, atheist by choice. My wife and my daughter should be able to walk in Indian streets without being asked to wear Burqa/Niqab/whatever bullshit. This can happen only when Hindus are in the majority. Because Hindus are diverse, tolerant about other faiths and this makes them the ideal majority group to be with.
    Don't trust me?
    Watch this discussion, where according to them Humans with Hindu faith will have no right to exists.
    ua-cam.com/users/liveVzjoHtYN05k?si=EKNRwJT5ua_acOv9

    • @Shva927
      @Shva927 11 місяців тому +11

      very few people would read this make it percise!😀

    • @riteshpawar7360
      @riteshpawar7360 11 місяців тому +12

      correct

    • @mtarek2005
      @mtarek2005 11 місяців тому +8

      this is why westerners SHOULD make videos on that

    • @Krishna0660
      @Krishna0660 11 місяців тому +10

      I literally cried reading this.... I hated modi so much....I still not support him.. But I'm more neutral now... Thank you❤🙏

    • @Vishwajeetvpsingh
      @Vishwajeetvpsingh 11 місяців тому +4

      Well said.

  • @imt4ng0
    @imt4ng0 11 місяців тому +482

    The misinformation, misinterpretations and overcomplications in this video is astounding solidifying the fact that the Westerners can not understand the Indian context and diversity even when they take extreme measures to understand.

    • @theabhishekmondal
      @theabhishekmondal 11 місяців тому +71

      Christian Nationalists Country : Good 🇻🇦
      Islamic Nationalists Country: Good🇵🇰
      Jewish Nationalists Country: Good 🇮🇱
      Hindu Nationalists Country: Bad 🇮🇳
      Western hypocrisy☕☕☕☕☕☕☕☕☕

    • @yeahyeah9869
      @yeahyeah9869 11 місяців тому +5

      @@theabhishekmondal who even said that🤣🤣🤣

    • @hashthehammer3726
      @hashthehammer3726 11 місяців тому +2

      2 rupees per tweet

    • @dheerajpimoli9539
      @dheerajpimoli9539 11 місяців тому +9

      ​@@yeahyeah9869u can see that in every video though this video tried be more informative but there were many mistake

    • @mtarek2005
      @mtarek2005 11 місяців тому

      ​@@theabhishekmondalall are bad, any religion is bad, any nationalism is bad

  • @ccpccp2126
    @ccpccp2126 11 місяців тому +494

    Will someone tell this man how suppressed Hindus are in current system? Our temple get taxed, meanwhile other's don't.

    • @greenweed3253
      @greenweed3253 11 місяців тому +76

      yeah and don't forget the 3rd largest land owner of India WAQF Board, sucking our tax money

    • @RahulSharma-ry2pg
      @RahulSharma-ry2pg 11 місяців тому +19

      That’s a WESTERN Interest …. Wait 10 more years he will WORSHIP Modi

    • @educhann
      @educhann 11 місяців тому +7

      Tldr : this comment is misleading and ignorant, read more for explanation.
      "There are some messages going around in the social media stating that the temple trusts have to pay the GST while the churches and mosques are exempt. This is completely untrue because no distinction is made in the GST law on any provision based on religion"
      - Ministry of Finance in a tweet from 2017.
      According to the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Act, any business/entity has to register themselves under Goods and Services Tax, if their aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds Rs 40 lakhs.
      There is no separate tax for an entity/body belonging to particular religion.
      Religious places are often managed by trusts, which also own other properties. To get the exemptions, the trust needs to be registered under Section 12AA of Income-tax Act, 1961 and the "services provided by Trusts are falling within the meaning charitable activities."
      - source "the quit"

    • @apekshithtj4055
      @apekshithtj4055 11 місяців тому +4

      exactly

    • @krishanSharma.69.69f
      @krishanSharma.69.69f 11 місяців тому

      ​@@educhannYou can't persuade a blind follower (andhbhakt).

  • @Harshsharma-sj4tm
    @Harshsharma-sj4tm 11 місяців тому +66

    Dharmik people as a global minority are genuinely concerned about their Rights if Hindus,Sikhs,Buddhist and Jains are persecuted anywhere in the world India as the birthplace of these ideas has an obligation to provide them security, citizenship and freedom of their religion and culture and i.e why CAA is absolutely a must...congress party has done this but they do it more implicitly and quietly because of their political obligation the poilitics of vote bank and politics of appeasement that they practice, BJP does this more explicitly, more loudly and more directly i.e the only diffrence between Congress and BJP.

  • @Adarsh-vv3mq
    @Adarsh-vv3mq 11 місяців тому +424

    To be honest, as being an indian on a day to day basis I don't see any Muslim having to suffer with any thing like the way it is exxagarated over here... Yes we still get news of two groups fighting with each other but I don't see any muslim being oppressed or feeling terrified.

    • @sampatkalyan3103
      @sampatkalyan3103 11 місяців тому

      infact i see hindus suffering due to muslims.

    • @ranadeepjash1150
      @ranadeepjash1150 11 місяців тому +72

      Are bro this guy has done research for this video from BBC that is why he is talking nonsensical.

    • @ajwaddanwarr3409
      @ajwaddanwarr3409 11 місяців тому +5

      Ever heard of a phenomena called observer bias "Adarsh"? I will believe this statement when a Muslims says it :p

    • @calebwilliams586
      @calebwilliams586 11 місяців тому +1

      ​@@ajwaddanwarr3409well said.

    • @Vishwajeetvpsingh
      @Vishwajeetvpsingh 11 місяців тому +29

      @@ajwaddanwarr3409I’m a minority the problem with India is only Muslims are considered minority but what about JAINS, JEWS, SIKHS like me and Buddhist, Parsis and other tribal religions and sect non of them complain. Jains Sikh Parsis are richest people in India. Muslims are in fight with other religions in all countries. Muslims vs Hindu in India. Muslim vs Christian in Europe, Muslim vs Jews in Israel, Muslim vs atheist in china . When a religion wants to convert the native religion the native religion will always resist. If Muslims stop the concept of conversion and stop prioritising religion and Muslim ummah they will not face resistance from other religions. The concept of conversion and idea of Muslim supremacy is the reason behind their problems with other religions.

  • @Steve_Gates
    @Steve_Gates 11 місяців тому +309

    This is what happens when you apply western framework of politics on non-western countries.

    • @mtarek2005
      @mtarek2005 11 місяців тому +1

      because most non-western countries are full of corruption

    • @sudharrsunnd3113
      @sudharrsunnd3113 10 місяців тому +8

      Yes, it finally makes sense

    • @MrTVintro
      @MrTVintro 8 місяців тому +3

      This comment section is what happens when a troll army shows up lol

    • @reagan_pereira_
      @reagan_pereira_ 5 місяців тому

      This is such a dumb argument. I’m Indian and I don’t know what “eastern” framework or context justifies the authoritarian bigoted shift in the politics and government of India. 🤡

    • @RR-pc7yv
      @RR-pc7yv 5 місяців тому +2

      @@MrTVintro Labelling all these people as 'troll army', only shows your lack of understanding of India, its people, history and socio-politics. In short, this only shows others and exposes your own intellectual bankruptcy and ignorance about India.

  • @Akshay-bc3et
    @Akshay-bc3et 11 місяців тому +142

    "Mahomad" Ghandy 😂..
    You got that one right.

  • @rahul9990
    @rahul9990 11 місяців тому +61

    the conversies he was involved or not, doesn't matter. One Best part of BJP ideology is that even being in opposition they never played politics when its comes to India as a country and they stood with the ruling party even someone from other country have even insulted the ruling leaders congress. And therefore A great leader should have goal and vision towards his countries growth in all sectors and had tried at best what BJP promised in their manifesto before election and delivered. Oppositions have tried to dragged him in some kind of controversies bt were failed as opposition had tried to labeled him that's it's and indians where almost frustrated by congress on same religious, caste propaganda. actually congress don't have an agenda accept religion and caste politics which will again tried to create divide in the society which british already did, what's difference??. Even Modi have tried to teach congress how to be an opposition party and what should be their agendas, and asked them to help India grow and be a part of it. no matter what opposition or west talks abt him, he really changed India internally and Globally. and india need a man like him. Dont knw if he'll be a prime minister or not bt BJP is in center means India will grow. Cheers

  • @Saif_guidence
    @Saif_guidence 11 місяців тому +22

    Wow the misinformation in this video is insane 😂

  • @deepak-dhankhar
    @deepak-dhankhar 11 місяців тому +307

    If this is not biased, then I don't know what is! 😂😂

    • @AshokSingh-cm2pu
      @AshokSingh-cm2pu 11 місяців тому +5

      It's #TheWireSquad. That's you.

    • @theabhishekmondal
      @theabhishekmondal 11 місяців тому +45

      Christian Nationalists Country : Good 🇻🇦
      Islamic Nationalists Country: Good🇵🇰
      Jewish Nationalists Country: Good 🇮🇱
      Hindu Nationalists Country: Bad 🇮🇳
      Western hypocrisy☕☕☕☕☕☕☕☕☕

    • @santoshNarayana
      @santoshNarayana 11 місяців тому +6

      Biased towards who? This seems pretty accurate depiction of what happened

    • @AradhyaPandey-q2w
      @AradhyaPandey-q2w 11 місяців тому +11

      ​@@santoshNarayanabro stop spamming 😂

    • @King_ofNight
      @King_ofNight 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@@santoshNarayana Modi's gonna get elected by thumping majority in 2024, even after this type of propaganda

  • @veryflow1156
    @veryflow1156 11 місяців тому +227

    I love all ur startups related videos now since you entered into politics i see lots of gaps in ur understanding
    1.) Case for Citizenship Amendment Act CAA - If you look at the population caharts of India, Pakistan and Afghanistan even Bangladesh you will soon realise Muslims have highest growth rate in India while hindus and Christians are ethinically killed in PAk and Afg so for them they have brought this rule. Just look at population concensus. Stick to somewhat reliable sources like UN and Pew research.
    2.) Case for Article 270 - You need to know about 1990 Kashmiri Hindu exodus.
    3,) Case for ram mandir - Ayodhya is birthplace of Sri Ram invader purposely broke it and made babri masjid in that place and issue was in supreme court for decades and other land parcel is allocated for muslims to make place for masjid as that designated place is for Hindu temple.
    Final point if you look at govt subsidy and schemes like Free ration and Pm awaas-housing scheme the biggest beneficairies are muslims as they are still poor due to massive population growth rate and teaching their kids in madrassa (masjids) insead of regular schools.
    I wonder why didnt you use comparative data rather build this knowledge on stupid articles from obviously funded media houses like al jazeera, bbc and many others. Stick to what you do better rather than enetering into things you dont understand.

    • @codejunkes4607
      @codejunkes4607 11 місяців тому

      Ahmadiyya Muslims are equally persecuted in Pakistan, even more than Hindus and Christians. Every few days, they are shot dead, and there are attacks on their mosques. It is punishable by jail terms, even the death penalty, if they call themselves Muslims in Pakistan. (Many Ahmediya are under the death penalty for blasphemy, as they call themselves Muslim).

    • @sanketkapale809
      @sanketkapale809 11 місяців тому +21

      Can’t expect nuances from wannabes
      He just blabbered jibber jabber from 4-5 long articles from “liberal” sources

    • @surajraika7821
      @surajraika7821 11 місяців тому +9

      well spoken
      he oversimplified things and liberal AKA liberndu will like these things but also do not wanna accept growth of india

    • @theabhishekmondal
      @theabhishekmondal 11 місяців тому +12

      Christian Nationalists Country : Good 🇻🇦
      Islamic Nationalists Country: Good🇵🇰
      Jewish Nationalists Country: Good 🇮🇱
      Hindu Nationalists Country: Bad 🇮🇳
      Western hypocrisy☕☕☕☕☕☕☕☕☕

    • @AtheistNationalist
      @AtheistNationalist 11 місяців тому +10

      @@sanketkapale809 funny how these liberals think that BJP was the one who started the Ram mandir issue. The 1st legal case regarding this issue was drafted in 1853, 4 years before the 1857 Indian rebellion 🤣(you can look this case's history up I wikipedia). Infact Modi and BJP should be credited for solving a 160 years old case and paving the path so that no future tussles happen over this issue of Ram Mandir.

  • @deepak-dhankhar
    @deepak-dhankhar 11 місяців тому +292

    Would be biased to say this video is not biased! 😂

    • @mtarek2005
      @mtarek2005 11 місяців тому +8

      it is not biased

    • @santoshNarayana
      @santoshNarayana 11 місяців тому +5

      Biased towards who? This seems pretty accurate depiction of what happened

    • @AradhyaPandey-q2w
      @AradhyaPandey-q2w 11 місяців тому +23

      ​@@santoshNarayanabiased towards the Indic view , what he told is same old left liberal POV they peddled for ages , what's new in that? All things are mentioned about all the issues India faced is one sided.

    • @AradhyaPandey-q2w
      @AradhyaPandey-q2w 11 місяців тому +6

      ​@@mtarek2005it is.

    • @ramnathnayak113
      @ramnathnayak113 11 місяців тому +10

      @@santoshNarayana yes, accurate if your news feed is from BBC, NDTV, Al-Jazeera, The Wire, The Washington Post...

  • @tivo3720
    @tivo3720 11 місяців тому +294

    RSS never ever said that u have to be hindu to be Indian. RSS also has a muslim wing that's called MRM .

    • @ajdoesactuallyplaygames
      @ajdoesactuallyplaygames 11 місяців тому

      ...you know that the Nazi party had a Jewish wing too, right? Before they were brutally killed, that is.

    • @theniravpanchal
      @theniravpanchal 11 місяців тому +32

      The BBC is the source of his research.

    • @darshmishra2207
      @darshmishra2207 10 місяців тому

      go acnd check the rss website and then say.

    • @Zunken12
      @Zunken12 10 місяців тому

      it was good video and its true stop be blind

    • @silvershroud6263
      @silvershroud6263 10 місяців тому

      This video sponsor by bbc, gorge soros and China.
      I wish indians channel will do documentary showing truth if Churchill and all.

  • @ihardikb
    @ihardikb 11 місяців тому +96

    When West try and explain things they always mess up! 💀

    • @PluetoeInc.
      @PluetoeInc. 11 місяців тому +2

      explain things which they have absolute zero idea of like living in a country with 1.4 billion population

  • @navneetgupta3600
    @navneetgupta3600 11 місяців тому +99

    I don't begrudge you for being wrong
    You're an outsider
    You rely on non-indian sources for your information
    And you have a western lens through which you're looking at India
    Detailed job
    A for effort

    • @digitalbath6057
      @digitalbath6057 11 місяців тому

      Yep these people rely on corrupt left liberal news channels for their view on India. Many corrupt paid clowns like Dhruv rathee, wire, quint, etc feed this propaganda, taking money from west. These people show their love for Islamist, not one Islamist leaves India and now even west has stopped taking these islamists. It seems everyone hates muslims but is not ready to say so in public.

    • @Zunken12
      @Zunken12 10 місяців тому

      it was good video and its true stop be blind

    • @navneetgupta3600
      @navneetgupta3600 10 місяців тому +5

      @@Zunken12 all of it is true!
      Not one thing is incorrect?
      Yep this youtuber is that infallible!
      Sure I'm the blind one!😂

    • @navneetgupta3600
      @navneetgupta3600 10 місяців тому +4

      @@Zunken12 I'm guessing you think modi hates muslim!
      Can you give me one example?

    • @swapneelbehera260
      @swapneelbehera260 9 місяців тому

      ​​@@navneetgupta3600he will of talk godhra kand which Modi was acquitted of .

  • @nbtp555
    @nbtp555 11 місяців тому +209

    I couldn't help but notice that several pivotal figures from the Indian National Army (INA) weren't highlighted in the video. Giants of the independence movement like Netaji Subhashchandra Bose, Sardar Patel, and Bhagat Singh deserve to be mentioned for their invaluable contributions.
    Furthermore, it's essential to bring to light certain decisions and events during Nehru's era. For instance:
    The complexities surrounding the Kashmir issue,
    The debated claim about rejecting a permanent seat at the UN,
    His role in the Non-Aligned Movement, which has divided opinions,
    And the reluctance regarding the Nuclear Deal.
    As for the political climate, I genuinely believe that BJP's rise has been beneficial for India. Although I acknowledge not everything the BJP has done is perfect, their achievements over the past decade seem more significant than what Congress managed in six decades. The fact that people are voting for BJP repeatedly suggests a significant shift in popular sentiment. It's also worth noting that, in my opinion, Congress, during its reign, perhaps didn't give due importance to representing certain historical events and figures accurately. The advent of the internet in India has shed light on many such topics, allowing people to reassess and understand our history better.

    • @arpan9937
      @arpan9937 11 місяців тому +7

      Agreed. Congress is the ultimate example of a bukake.

    • @maheshwarreddykasula6113
      @maheshwarreddykasula6113 11 місяців тому +11

      He also didn’t mention about the scams, security concerns and defense deal mishaps during the congress reign,
      Also how UPI has changed the country.
      And how the opposition’s time and time coalitions still couldn’t get them a majority

    • @maheshwarreddykasula6113
      @maheshwarreddykasula6113 11 місяців тому +13

      CAA, GODHRA RIOTS have been mentioned but conveniently disregarding their main cause and actions

    • @codejunkes4607
      @codejunkes4607 11 місяців тому

      Modi is the Edogan of India, a politician from a banned religious organization now ruling the country and destroying the hard work its founder did to modernise the country by ensuring scientific thinking and rationalism among its population.

    • @AradhyaPandey-q2w
      @AradhyaPandey-q2w 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@@maheshwarreddykasula6113exactly

  • @ranadeepjash1150
    @ranadeepjash1150 11 місяців тому +38

    This video is the result of watching BBC and Newyork time. 😂

  • @rjrastapopoulos1595
    @rjrastapopoulos1595 11 місяців тому +82

    If Modi is an autocrat then why does he care so much about votes? Why did he not go ahead with the farm bills that would have revolutionized India's agricultural sector? Why does he campaign so hard even before state elections? If he is an autocrat, like Putin, he should win every election with 90% vote share without even doing much. That doesn't happen does it?

    • @tivo3720
      @tivo3720 11 місяців тому

      He would don't worry

    • @AradhyaPandey-q2w
      @AradhyaPandey-q2w 11 місяців тому +9

      ​@@tivo3720you guys saying same thing for a decade now , he'll he'll? When bro he have served for 10 years now.

    • @tivo3720
      @tivo3720 11 місяців тому +2

      @@AradhyaPandey-q2w we said he will build the Ram mandir. And after 500 years he finally buliding it

    • @KundanBhumi
      @KundanBhumi 11 місяців тому +17

      ​@@tivo3720so it's makes him dictator ok that's your level of intelligence 😂😂

    • @darkside3290
      @darkside3290 10 місяців тому +3

      ​@@KundanBhumiyeah the opposing party imposed emergency which took most of the rights from people and murdering thousands of them. And today atleast we dont hear any explosions nearby. So if he seems a dictator to you then India needs this type of dictatorship.

  • @darthvader5558
    @darthvader5558 11 місяців тому +102

    The Babri Masjid was destroyed because it was built on a temple or a temple structure which predated the mosque at the same site, When the Mughal forces of Babur invaded Ayodhya in 1528, they destroyed several Temples and forcefully converted and m@ssacred those who refused to convert, on one of the major destroyed temple sites Babur ordered he's general Mir Baqi to build the Babri masjid
    In 1992, the Masjid was taken down and in 2020, after 28 years of dispute, The Supreme Court ordered the land to be handed over to a trust to build the Ram temple

    • @AKumar-co7oe
      @AKumar-co7oe 11 місяців тому +25

      It was a temple structure - KK Mohammad has confirmed at multiple points.

    • @stefano1405
      @stefano1405 11 місяців тому +5

      There were some inaccuracies like modi didn't marry because of renunciation rather then rss and they didn't tell what rss mean by hindu!

    • @AradhyaPandey-q2w
      @AradhyaPandey-q2w 11 місяців тому +4

      ​@@stefano1405exactly many people in RSS are married.

    • @MrTVintro
      @MrTVintro 8 місяців тому

      Buddy, when there's a 600 year difference between current day and when your preferred type of structure existed you can't really make an appeal to historical vandalism as an excuse to commit current vandalism.

  • @metromaster7025
    @metromaster7025 11 місяців тому +25

    Nations do not progress until they get visionary leader.and Narendra Modi is one of those visionary leaders. Although this video has many flows and a lack of proper info, you have just oversimplified the RSS, temple, CAA, hindutva things

  • @ishaan6512
    @ishaan6512 11 місяців тому +83

    My man researched for 5 mins and started writing his script.

    • @pakistani_pig786
      @pakistani_pig786 11 місяців тому +3

      😂

    • @yashsonune4391
      @yashsonune4391 10 місяців тому

      well I believe, the reference that are available in the foreign lands are by default biased. So can't help it.

  • @riteshpawar7360
    @riteshpawar7360 11 місяців тому +35

    pls dont't spread mis-information and dis-information.

  • @sidhantsingh453
    @sidhantsingh453 11 місяців тому +11

    Bruhh it's too much leftist
    I just ask read the genocide towards the Hindu during mughals Raj and pls read the book "Hindu's in hindu rashtra by Anand Ranganath"

  • @dharmpatel6350
    @dharmpatel6350 11 місяців тому +8

    Ok. But that's Western prospective.
    Many facts in this video were distorted.
    Don't make an opinion by this video. See the indian side also.

  • @NotMuch-mu4he
    @NotMuch-mu4he 11 місяців тому +8

    He is WHITE DHRUV Rathi........😂😂

  • @our_stories.06
    @our_stories.06 11 місяців тому +90

    While you are watching this remember ,Modi had the most humble upbringings,whether you like or hate him ,today when the world is lacking true leaders we need to learn from this man,not his political ideology but his personal insights as to how break burden of poverty and the social beurocratic circle.

    • @digitalbath6057
      @digitalbath6057 11 місяців тому

      Only Islamist and commies hate him. He has some a great deal for this nation. If not for muslims, India would have been far far better country

    • @akshaysinghaaa
      @akshaysinghaaa 10 місяців тому +1

      Mafia hai

  • @akirhamza
    @akirhamza 11 місяців тому +39

    Beyond politics, Modi is an avid reader and he has written many poems in Gujarat.

  • @SunnyM360
    @SunnyM360 11 місяців тому +174

    No one ever talks about the Sindhi Hindus who lost their land after partition. Look into it. During the mass exodus, my grandmother was kidnapped off a train, she was saved by her brother who fought and dragged her back on. They landed in Bombay after losing everything, now refugees. They lost everything. And had to rebuild.
    Sindhis resettled all over the world, assimilating into the cultures around them.

  • @Maitreya-7777
    @Maitreya-7777 11 місяців тому +109

    I like Modi. He is that guy who represent leader. I do not need any leader who comes from political background. I want a leader who truly represent us.

  • @SafavidAfsharid3197
    @SafavidAfsharid3197 11 місяців тому +63

    Indian prime minister don't order the indian military or central armed forces. It's under the control of the defence ministry and home ministry not under the office of prime minister.

    • @AtheistNationalist
      @AtheistNationalist 11 місяців тому +15

      And it's supreme head is the President not Prime Minister

    • @premanandamishra7470
      @premanandamishra7470 11 місяців тому +1

      bruh the defense ministry and home ministry are under pmo

    • @vasusingh5046
      @vasusingh5046 11 місяців тому

      @@premanandamishra7470Exactly

    • @princeodogwu
      @princeodogwu 11 місяців тому

      Another Indian bot

  • @sunnyrocks2
    @sunnyrocks2 11 місяців тому +10

    According to whom, does Hindutva means being Hindu ? Who gives people this misinformation.

  • @theabhishekmondal
    @theabhishekmondal 11 місяців тому +11

    Christian Nationalists Country : Good 🇻🇦
    Islamic Nationalists Country: Good🇵🇰
    Jewish Nationalists Country: Good 🇮🇱
    Hindu Nationalists Country: Bad 🇮🇳
    Western hypocrisy☕☕☕☕☕☕☕☕☕

    • @glynphelps9027
      @glynphelps9027 4 місяці тому

      In what universe do you live in to think that Pakistan is betrayed as good in the west 😊

  • @blackman7186
    @blackman7186 11 місяців тому +89

    Modi can be considered tbe ideal example of a politician. No politican is clear and that's everywhere. In the end, india is still a hindu majority country and its culture is dominated by hindu ideals, modi is very complicated.. He just wants to get things done weather hook or crook, whether it be power or development. There are different opinions about him but one thing no one can deny is the fact that he has transformed india like never before. If the transformation is good or bad can only be judged by the people who may vote him again for the third term.

    • @theabhishekmondal
      @theabhishekmondal 11 місяців тому +14

      Christian Nationalists Country : Good 🇻🇦
      Islamic Nationalists Country: Good🇵🇰
      Jewish Nationalists Country: Good 🇮🇱
      Hindu Nationalists Country: Bad 🇮🇳
      Western hypocrisy☕☕☕☕☕☕☕☕☕

    • @KundanBhumi
      @KundanBhumi 11 місяців тому +6

      Don't worry we will vote him again in 2024

    • @mridulkanti1995
      @mridulkanti1995 11 місяців тому +2

      He sacrificed his whole youth and family for the sack of his Civilization . what are you saying man....

  • @Kothwalashivakumar
    @Kothwalashivakumar 11 місяців тому +61

    Thanks for bringing to us this unbiased content without even stepping in India and using ur excellent verbal skills. I thought I know much about my country. Looks like I know little. Also thanks for teaching me an important skill to destroy any culture, mastering propaganda. You guys are the best.😅😊😮😢😂

    • @CaptainSuj
      @CaptainSuj 11 місяців тому +7

      fr, the white man spreads propoganda and says Modi is not good

    • @Charvak-Atheist
      @Charvak-Atheist 11 місяців тому +4

      Unbiased 😂😂

    • @Nitish.Singhal
      @Nitish.Singhal 10 місяців тому +2

      Unbiased 😂😂 nice satire

    • @Kothwalashivakumar
      @Kothwalashivakumar 10 місяців тому

      @@CaptainSuj that’s a satire ji

    • @Kothwalashivakumar
      @Kothwalashivakumar 10 місяців тому +1

      Hi all. The above comment is a funny satire.

  • @samuraiRoniz
    @samuraiRoniz 11 місяців тому +16

    Wrong on multiple facts what were you smoking man! Esp. Citizenship Acts cannot include muslim because Pakistan and Bangladesh both r muslim majority where others r persecuted

  • @gaurking
    @gaurking 11 місяців тому +7

    Too many factual errors and glossing over facts. It's nothing more than a one eyed birds eye view flying over thick fog. I mean you are calling a terrorist and murderer nurtured by Pakistan and congress a charismatic Sikh leader do I need to say more...

  • @anirbande7893
    @anirbande7893 11 місяців тому +64

    1.That's a bald faced lie. Godse killed Gandhi because after the Partition of India into East and West Pakistan, Gandhi started pushing for a land corridor connecting the two, which would have split India once again into a North and South regions bisected by Pakistan. Remember both Nehru and Gandh had publicly proclaimed that the partition of the Motherland would happen over their dead bodies.
    2. RSS does not ban people from marriage. "Pracharaks" or full time volunteers are supposed to be unmarried as they are encouraged to view the nation as their family and not have to choose between personal and public duty. They live full time on the premises and are often deployed to remote locations. They can choose to leave at any point to pursue a family. Remember Modi was married when he was a minor.
    3. Secular and Socialist were added to the constitution illegally by Indira Gandhi during the emergency without the consent of Parliament and possibly by request of the Soviet Union.
    4. Indira was of disreputable character having numerous affairs with a number of men including her father's secretary M O Mathai, which he detailed in his memoir. She was kicked out of Oxford for poor academic performance and kicked out of Shantiniketan by Rabindranath Tagore himself for her amorous ways (sources suggest sleeping with her German teacher) and absolute disinterest in her studies. She secretly married a Muslim man Feroz Khan (who wss either the a grocer or liquor supplier to the Nehrus) in a mosque in London and changed her name to Maimuna Begun and converting to Islam. Her father afraid his family and Indira losing grip over New Delhi, forced Feroz to change his surname to Gandhi and publicly got them married in India under Hindu rituals and the Hindu Marriage Act - something which was and is illegal. All this with the complete knowledge and support of " Mahatma" Gandhi.
    5. Brindenwale was propped up by Indira as a means to curb the power of the Akalis, which were the ruling faction in Punjab. India was a food insecure nation and Indira wanted control of the agriculturally productive state of Punjab so it could not be used against her as a bargaining chip. And Hindus did not attack Sikhs. It was congree carders and supporters who did. This was poitical violence not communal. BTW, Skihs were Hindus who militarized as a force against the Mughals. The firstborn son from every Hindu household in the region would be designated a Sikh and would be sent to fight against the Islamic invaders. They were encouraged to identify as a separate religion by the British in order to weaken the resistance movement developing in India.
    6. Hindus did not just believe Ayodhya to be Ram's birthplace, there was an ASI survey of the site under the supervision of both parties, which concluded irrevocably that the site was previously a Hindu temple with a stone engraving dedicated to the birthplace of Lord Ram. Of the over 40,000 temples demolished by the Mughals, Hindus demanded only 3- Ayodhya, Kashi and Mathura. But the muslim side would not budge. To them their mosques - the majority of which were defunct and in disuse and disrepair were still in their very existence a symbol of Islamic supremacy over the native people.
    7. As for the "secular" fabric of the nation, it was and is a selective one where foreign religions have kept special status and autonomy in setting up and administrating her institutions and religious sites, while Hindus cannot. They remain in the hands of the government where the government in states have full authority in regulation and even selling off of temple assets with absolutely no consultation with the practioners of the Hindu faith. Eg. Muslim men can have up to four legal wives, and have their own separate Personal Law under which they run a parallel justice system.
    Hindus live in a apartheid state even after being forced to surrender a third of their nation on religious grounds. Go read "Hindus in an Hindu Rashtra" by Dr. Anand Ranganathan, who btw is an atheist, scientist and professor at JNU.

    • @pavanvenkat9182
      @pavanvenkat9182 11 місяців тому +3

      Perfect 👍

    • @yogeshchaurasia5611
      @yogeshchaurasia5611 11 місяців тому +2

      Thank you so much for highlighting this. You saved a lot of trouble to write down and post things. Ima CPP this.

    • @anirbande7893
      @anirbande7893 11 місяців тому +2

      @@yogeshchaurasia5611 I still haven't seen the entire video, I'm rebutting as I go.😅

    • @yogeshchaurasia5611
      @yogeshchaurasia5611 11 місяців тому

      @@anirbande7893 yeah these people perceive hindutva as some Terrorist ideology while they do not even know the proper meaning and essence of it. This person in the video called RSS "the Hindu paramilitary group". Like they are some militants. So many things have just been assumed in this video It feels like we can point out things every minute and write paragraphs on it lol.

    • @MAC-vi7fy
      @MAC-vi7fy 11 місяців тому +8

      A lot of factual inaccuracies in this video:
      1:30 RSS doesn't say you need to be a hindu to truly be Indian, RSS has a muslim arm.
      1:50 Godse killed gandhi not because of what you said, he killed him because he thought gandhi was responsible for partition of India that killed millions of people.
      2:20 Again, incorrect, prominent members of RSS like Minister Nitin Gatkari are married.
      3:33 Again, incorrect India was made secular only in 1971. The word secular was not there in original constitution.
      12:35 There is archaeological evidence and written historical evidence of Ram Mandir, read Supreme court verdict. Destrcution of Babri Masjid was a sign of renaissance similar to reconquista of spain, but through a democratic process.
      18:48 Absolutely false, the journalist spreading this fake info was prosecuted and sentenced.
      20:22 Again, thats hearsay vajpaye never said anything even remotely close to that, it was disgruntled yashwant sinha who said that he said. All hearsay.
      20:47 Still false, modi attended mosque and gurdwara ceremonies often as a CM of Gujrat and even now as PM of india
      30:54 Modi didnt ban it the supreme court banned it, they had banned it in 1989 but Congress overturned Supreme court decision.
      31:50 The US gives preference to Christians and Jews in citizenship so do most european countries.
      33:15 you forgot to tell that the Ram Mandir was ordered by supreme court which made a decision based on constitution.

  • @SkumarC
    @SkumarC 11 місяців тому +13

    Still you simply can't get a neutral view of indian politics. Coz of skewness of data available.
    Not your mistake tbh, you will take your media (which we all know are compromised to brim) more seriously than critically checking the facts, here you are just reading artilcles in monotone.
    And Someone said, americans have the best primary data collection source but their chronic self centred bias hinders their ability to understand a foreign country and it is gonna stop them in correctly evaluating on how to run the foreign policy.

  • @aseem00
    @aseem00 11 місяців тому +11

    India was not secular in original constitution it was added during emergency by Indira Gandhi
    Your information is not correct

  • @srinidhikarthikbs981
    @srinidhikarthikbs981 11 місяців тому +18

    While other political parties are compared against their opposition, for some reason BJP and Modi are compared against 'Perfection'. If only you spent a second comparing BJP against INC, it would become clear to you what a drastic upgrade it is, despite all its imperfections.

  • @arjunkushwaha4146
    @arjunkushwaha4146 11 місяців тому +19

    Another Angreez disposing his Gyaan on India 😂

  • @shantanunarwade
    @shantanunarwade 11 місяців тому +4

    It seems that you dont accept the verdict of Indian people or you might consider us illiterate, those who lives ourside of india and comment on us, first they should read history perticularly Muslim Invasion of india and the distruction and rapes carried out these peaceful people.😊
    Jai Hind

    • @shantanunarwade
      @shantanunarwade 11 місяців тому

      I dont blame you, you said whats available to you , this is the classic case of Availability bias.

    • @shantanunarwade
      @shantanunarwade 11 місяців тому

      Modi did said "This is not an era of war", and your sources skipped it, 😇, Modi is doing what is neede to done in ineterest of india.

  • @tapasranjanpati9472
    @tapasranjanpati9472 11 місяців тому +5

    Great effort but lots of misinformation. Cant blame you, though..

  • @dhruveshsureshrathi8462
    @dhruveshsureshrathi8462 11 місяців тому +20

    Few Corrections -
    1. At 28 mins timeline - Noone died in the demonetisation lines.
    2. Citizenship Amendment Laws - This was dream of M.K. Gandhi , which Modi made reality.
    3. Hindus love Modi , because He denied the Muslim appeasement Policy , which was practiced by most of his predecessors.

  • @krushna4181
    @krushna4181 11 місяців тому +19

    "Modi ordered the face off with the Chinese soldiers"
    The very first sentence that came out of your mouth is false. 😂

    • @princeodogwu
      @princeodogwu 11 місяців тому +1

      Must be strange to find out that the leader of a country is the commander in chief huh? Yes the mod and home ministry has direct authority but who is the pm? 😂😂😂 what a dummy

  • @gaurking
    @gaurking 11 місяців тому +58

    Also RSS is not a paramilitary organization by any stretch of the imagination. The only militaristic thing they do is discipline, and physical fitness. It's essentially a group of neighborhoods uncles providing social support to all Indians. Their free help in education food support etc is done irrespective of religion or caates. And they teach nationalism in line with laws and helping your fellow indians

    • @lakshyajain8240
      @lakshyajain8240 11 місяців тому +3

      that is the public interaction sector of RSS, which you might know by the name "shakha"

    • @superpromaxplus
      @superpromaxplus 11 місяців тому

      This is how you put propoganda in information
      Looks like Most of his research coming from leftists media

    • @gaurking
      @gaurking 11 місяців тому +2

      @@lakshyajain8240 your point being

  • @Dr.Vichitra_101
    @Dr.Vichitra_101 10 місяців тому +7

    India and Pakistan was separated on the basis of religion by the British. So hearing Hindu Nationalist is very pleasing to ears despite what peoples intentions are.

  • @rollinglama
    @rollinglama 11 місяців тому +145

    Narendra Modi is the best PM we have ever got. Being a Muslim it might be difficult for others to accept. But he is what we are. We never had a chance to express ourselves globally. We never thought India would be great. But Narendra Modi, he made us what we we are. Don't give me any useless logics. He is the true man. Modi is passionate about India. Not just hindus

    • @rohanbhutani8439
      @rohanbhutani8439 11 місяців тому +22

      @@akashgovardhana1663you’re absolutely clueless about geopolitics and your comment shows that. No one cared about India before modi became PM. He travelled a lot in his first term to forge relations which are now bearing fruits

    • @AtheistNationalist
      @AtheistNationalist 11 місяців тому +14

      akashgovardhama1663. Meanwhile you're probably writing this using JIO Internet 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
      Edit: the congress bhakt deleted his comment 💀.

    • @stefano1405
      @stefano1405 11 місяців тому

      ​@@akashgovardhana1663let me name you few things that modi did
      No.1 ke liye to abhi Safar baaki hai parantu
      In 9 salon mein: GDP: 3.7 trillion
      Export: 750+ billion
      Metro city: 20
      Airport: 152
      Electricity in village: 95%
      AIMS: 22
      Total Expressway length: 4067km
      Road Quality: 42no.
      Total Unicorn: 114
      1 GB cost: 15
      Internet Connection: 93%
      Rail Length: 55198km
      MBBS seats: 101148
      PG Medical seats: 65335 Medical colleges: 660
      More things
      UPI, Vande Bharat Bharat, make in India, swatch Bharat, Weapons export Etc World Largest Stadium
      World Biggest Statue
      World Longest Railway station
      Asia Biggest Helicopter manufacturing unit
      World Longest Electrified Rail tunnel
      World Longest Cruise ship
      Jet engine deal with IP transfer, Apple manufacturing, Tesla
      project in progress and ABOVE ALL:
      Removal of article 370
      Now are you happy

    • @stefano1405
      @stefano1405 11 місяців тому +1

      There were some inaccuracies like modi didn't marry because of renunciation rather then rss and they didn't tell what rss mean by hindu! When rss says hindu they talk about geographical identity rather then religious! And they are concerned about patriotism rather then religious aspects!

    • @jonnymcgrath4816
      @jonnymcgrath4816 11 місяців тому +1

      You’re not Muslim bro 😂😂 this is the most overrated phrase Hindu say all the time 😂😂

  • @himanshutripathi6114
    @himanshutripathi6114 11 місяців тому +6

    9:39 morarji desaai was a cia 🕵puppy 10:02

  • @RB_INSIGHT
    @RB_INSIGHT 11 місяців тому +21

    The guy who assassinated M.K. Gandhi was associated by RSS in the past and was not member of it when the assassination happened .

    • @AtheistNationalist
      @AtheistNationalist 11 місяців тому +2

      And ironic is he actually left RSS becuase he saw that they weren't violent enough to assassinate Gandhi. People blaming RSS for godse when godse himself left RSS becusse they weren't so violent

    • @johnchrist-cn8ql
      @johnchrist-cn8ql 2 місяці тому +1

      also Atal Bihari Vajpayee was from RSS yet a Gandhian. But WEST Hypocrisy never end.

  • @dranjan16
    @dranjan16 11 місяців тому +8

    How misinformed & hinduphobic you want to be?
    this guy: yes

  • @tivo3720
    @tivo3720 11 місяців тому +5

    British India was divided by Religion . Pakistan and Bangladesh was born as Islamic countries. While the Hindu majority India choose secularism. Why would we allow the citizenship of muslims from Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan?!!!! We already gave lands to them.

  • @ontisalaga1789
    @ontisalaga1789 11 місяців тому +5

    I am no Modi supporter but this is just lazy research. The issues are way more complex and the number of factual inaccuracies are astounding.

  • @AradhyaPandey-q2w
    @AradhyaPandey-q2w 11 місяців тому +5

    First of all RSS doesn't believe that to be Indian you have to be Hindu, but they believe that all Indians are Hindu by their ancestory, means their forefathers were hindu before they converted into different faiths, they're not desrcriminative about other's but their ideology has formed due to series of invasion India faced both Islamic and British, their ideology is basically formed out of resistance.
    Second, the person who assassinated Gandhi don't wasn't from RSS, many people claim connection but there's nothing proven, even they faces trials after Gandhi's death but it isn't proven.

  • @S.L.0311
    @S.L.0311 11 місяців тому +3

    bro got the script for this video from al jazeera 💀, i would request you to come to India spend some time, learn how elections are conducted, from grass root level and make a decision. christian, jews, parsi, sindhi are real minorites in India and they are protected and thriving in India and don't face any discrimination must because they are not hindus. I also advise you to take into account the foreign prejudice against India and the leadership of India in the time of nehru and gandhis which gave rise to problems that India is facing till now and additionally i will advice you to study US and pakistans partnership in training afgan nationals and basically forming terrorist that were fighting in Afghanistan which later were used against India by Pakistan, the violence that Kashmir has seen and the ethnic cleansing that was happening there was long ignored by former indian leaderships. and regarding the hindu nationalism that you were taking about, i would also advice you to look at level of hatred that is injected in pakistans youth by their religious institution, political leaders, celebrities and fear that is instilled in the minds of Muslims across borders to justify the defense spending in Pakistan which is mostly ends up in banks accounts of army generals and to play a religion based politics on the side of India.

  • @ShivamSoni-uz5xw
    @ShivamSoni-uz5xw 11 місяців тому +39

    He is our emotions. He is reviving the culture pf our country which i love the most. Bcz we have only one country our lovely Bharat.

  • @ishikinokami1575
    @ishikinokami1575 11 місяців тому +64

    British did not create funny borders here. The upper caste Sunni Muslims did. They created an Islamic Pakistan and an Islamic Bangladesh,but when Hindus asked for a Hindu India,Gandhi refused. Gandhi didn't even speak up against violence committed by Pakistan on the day of partition . He in fact told the Hindus "Eye for an eye will make the world blind".
    THIS IS WHY GANDHI IS HATED.
    Mentioning Pakistan's brutality and sympathy of SOME Indian muslim extremists is crucial to understanding Modi's rise.

    • @techbd2477
      @techbd2477 11 місяців тому

      Did not india created Bangladesh to split Pakistan?

    • @NativeBharatiye
      @NativeBharatiye 11 місяців тому

      ​@@techbd2477Bangladeshi was east Pakistan what's difference??

    • @techbd2477
      @techbd2477 11 місяців тому

      @@NativeBharatiye the were one county.India created Bangladesh to make Pakistan smaller and weaker.

    • @NativeBharatiye
      @NativeBharatiye 11 місяців тому

      @@techbd2477 yes, rping east Bengali women🇧🇩 in Army camps by Pakistani army was *Humanity*. Which was making Pakistan strong.
      That's why india librated Bangladesh 🇧🇩.
      Btw it was Pakistan who attacked india first , otherwise india wouldn't taking part in war.
      Pakistan army *atrocities* on Balochistan, Sindhudesh, pashtunistan, is also making Pakistan strong 👌. Just one more war atack on India . All will be librated like Bangladesh 🇧🇩.

    • @NativeBharatiye
      @NativeBharatiye 11 місяців тому

      @@techbd2477 Look at Bangladesh 🇧🇩 now, they can even buy entire Pakistan🇵🇰 but it wouldn't be happening if they were with Pakistan. Their genocide would be continuous.
      I'm proud of our Bangladeshi neighbours on economic growth 📈

  • @pratyushkk_3
    @pratyushkk_3 11 місяців тому +6

    Bro, got all facts sourced from BBC and NYT... literally, it felt like a BBC guy was giving a history lesson to Indians about India with his one-sided and forged facts.

  • @ver.vaibhav007
    @ver.vaibhav007 11 місяців тому +8

    In reality RSS is nothing like that 🙏
    The West narrates RSS as an ULTRA -HINDU MILITARY UNIT, but in reality major members of RSS are over 50😂

  • @Umang_Daily_News_2003
    @Umang_Daily_News_2003 11 місяців тому +7

    Modi 2024 Again 🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩🚩

  • @ObsidianSpearhead
    @ObsidianSpearhead 11 місяців тому +5

    Now banned RSS ?
    What the hell are you talking

  • @kindofanmol
    @kindofanmol 11 місяців тому +4

    Least ill-informed American dude:

  • @outhereplayin
    @outhereplayin 11 місяців тому +63

    love him or hate him u can't ignore him.

    • @theriam6281
      @theriam6281 11 місяців тому +9

      Let's be honest... They just hate him 😂

    • @Saif_guidence
      @Saif_guidence 11 місяців тому +27

      ​@@theriam6281Let's be honest everyone hates Ghandhi Dynasty family more than modi 😂

    • @theriam6281
      @theriam6281 11 місяців тому +11

      @@Saif_guidence ofc, that's why Modi is in power despite his haters because many more people love him, than those who hate him

    • @krishanSharma.69.69f
      @krishanSharma.69.69f 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@@Saif_guidenceGhandu pariwar was in power for more time than modi parivar.

    • @krishanSharma.69.69f
      @krishanSharma.69.69f 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@rizqanartModi is like a celebrity. People follow him blindly. It's sad. India needs a direct democracy.

  • @tusharmadaan5480
    @tusharmadaan5480 11 місяців тому +23

    John does not understand Hindutva. Hunditva does not mean to be truly indian you need to be Hindu. It means we are historically common civilization that was that belives in principles of sanatan dharma(translated as timeless principles): which values secularism, tolerance, being in balance with nature and valueing search of knowledge. All religions in India are welcome and have lived harmoniously for centuries before the British ever colonized India.

  • @michaeljoby5244
    @michaeljoby5244 11 місяців тому +5

    He maybe Hindu nationalist and anti minority still he is the best prime minister India since 1965 they are really focused on developing before him India was a very corrupt country the delay on action were common which ultimately cost India to fall far behind china. after him the change can be seen the government is more responsible on economy and everything

  • @giriaakula
    @giriaakula 11 місяців тому +37

    Religion might not be a big issue in west. Because it never experienced religious violence, infact it is the one which is the oppressor in many cases. But in india, it is opposite; hindus most of the time got the short hand in many cases for many years. There is a genuine frustration that even though becoming a independent nation hindus are still didn't get full attention from mostly secular governments. Modi, for the first time showed india, that government cares for hindus. Modi is not perfect, but the alternative is way worse.

    • @mtarek2005
      @mtarek2005 11 місяців тому

      anything affiliated with religion is just bad

    • @philhobrla8489
      @philhobrla8489 11 місяців тому +2

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Bartholomew's_Day_massacre - the “West” very much has experienced religious violence, just less recently.

    • @manh9105
      @manh9105 11 місяців тому

      They have fought 400 yr religious wars and before that in 400 years Christians killed every single Pagan (native religionist) in Europe. Looks like you didn't get education

    • @theniravpanchal
      @theniravpanchal 11 місяців тому

      True Bhai. But we still have a long way to go.
      Our Temples are still under Govt control. We have to free our temples from Govt loot.
      Still there crores of illegal infiltrators from Pakistan and Bangladesh are living in india. We have to deport all of them.
      We have to scrap Waqf board.
      Reform judiciary.

    • @cosmos1487
      @cosmos1487 8 місяців тому

      @@philhobrla8489did other religion took whole nation as large as pakistan, afghanistan and bangladesh and made it islamic?

  • @fatshaddy-rz2wn
    @fatshaddy-rz2wn 11 місяців тому +7

    18:12 man the voilence WAS orgainsed by the government and their far west allies in persia and arab lands , read any conflict from 712AD to 1206 Terraian war to 1300's of Khilji to 1526 of babur to 1650's of akhbar to 1706 till Aurangzeb dies to 1750's of delhi massacre of nadir shah and alldhali , if you read any of these wars you would know that Muslims were the govt and hindus were the subjects and they were the most suffered in their own lands , also were are the most patient of all communities , in ram lala temple case we waited for 500 years where as when Catholics regained SPAIN they converted all the mosques into cathedrales withing 50 years so , its a very touchy subject and if you don't know the ground truth , don't take sides just present facts and figures
    cheers to you for the other good documnetaries but not this one

  • @mohitpatil9654
    @mohitpatil9654 10 місяців тому +6

    One of the bold move which let to Modi and BJP successfully plan and implementation of good governance is giving election tickets to former civil servants like Ajit Doval, S Jaishankar and K Annamalai. These people with years of governance experience in their field with the support of BJP in politics led to a lot of changes in National security and Foreign Diplomacy as well as setting up digital infrastructure like UPI and other centralized Systems.

  • @Aakash__2002lk
    @Aakash__2002lk 10 місяців тому +5

    India is secular because of of Hindu majority. If Muslims have majority like Pakistan there hindus & sikh are suffering. After partition their were above 20% of hindu population.in present less than 1%.
    Maximum Muslims are not loyal for India.
    We are building ram mandir after supreme court verdict. Those temple was distroyed by Muslim leader mugal aurangzeb. That place is birth place of lord rama.
    In video you didn't mention our emotions towards the lord rama.
    You just cover about hindu role.
    But situation is not like that we understand better than you.
    Why are Western people not aware from Muslim cult.

  • @Cray-wilder
    @Cray-wilder 11 місяців тому +3

    Is he dhruv rathee of usa? Dhruv rathee is an indian UA-camr mostly talks about politics.

  • @aakashrai6820
    @aakashrai6820 11 місяців тому +6

    When you paid for biased 😂😂

  • @raj-nq8ke
    @raj-nq8ke 11 місяців тому +15

    7:43 RSS is not banned. Its a public welfare service by nationalists still working for social cause.

    • @MAC-vi7fy
      @MAC-vi7fy 11 місяців тому +4

      The whole video is filled with lies.
      1:30 RSS doesn't say you need to be a hindu to truly be Indian, RSS has a muslim arm.
      1:50 Godse killed gandhi not because of what you said, he killed him because he thought gandhi was responsible for partition of India that killed millions of people.
      2:20 Again, incorrect, prominent members of RSS like Minister Nitin Gatkari are married.
      3:33 Again, incorrect India was made secular only in 1971. The word secular was not there in original constitution.
      12:35 There is archaeological evidence and written historical evidence of Ram Mandir, read Supreme court verdict. Destrcution of Babri Masjid was a sign of renaissance similar to reconquista of spain, but through a democratic process.
      18:48 Absolutely false, the journalist spreading this fake info was prosecuted and sentenced.
      20:22 Again, thats hearsay vajpaye never said anything even remotely close to that, it was disgruntled yashwant sinha who said that he said. All hearsay.
      20:47 Still false, modi attended mosque and gurdwara ceremonies often as a CM of Gujrat and even now as PM of india
      30:54 Modi didnt ban it the supreme court banned it, they had banned it in 1989 but Congress overturned Supreme court decision.
      31:50 The US gives preference to Christians and Jews in citizenship so do most european countries.
      33:15 you forgot to tell that the Ram Mandir was ordered by supreme court which made a decision based on constitution.

  • @mukeshKumar-pw2oc
    @mukeshKumar-pw2oc 11 місяців тому +5

    Idk but i think you just hyped the fact that muslims aren't safe in india but its not true according to hinduisms we are taught to retaliate not to attack first and because of thease reason most of the religious clashes happened were happened cause of first muslim attack
    before the mosque was even built there from around 2000 years city has been holy place for hinduism and the mosque was built by muslim rulers to
    spread islam in inida anyway now we have learned how to get our own rights literally muslims can marry several womens here and therefore there's hike in muslim population why so much difference? goverment should restrict them to marry single just single women i woke up everyday and i hear muslim prayers on speakers loud but i dont say anything but i have seen one thing whenever we
    we do the same prayer stuff
    many of them object on us this isn't fair modi ji is doing good and we follow his ideology to bring our culture back to life😮

  • @arnavvashisth6489
    @arnavvashisth6489 11 місяців тому +10

    Dear John Coogan,
    I usually agree with your analysis of technology,geopolitics and enjoy your videos thoroughly. However, this video has disappointment me greatly. I would like to point out a few wrong points raised by you:
    1. Narendra Modi won Gujurat state election due to development in the state of Gujurat. Your analysis indicates that Ayodhya, where the Mosque was demolished is in Gujurat. However, Ayodhya is located in Uttar Pradesh, not Gujurat. Hence, these are two different things.
    2. "The Sikh Militants" killed in OP Bluestar were terrorists inciting violence not militants
    3. The assassination of Mahatma Gandhi is a contentious issue and BJP.RSS did not support the assassination of Gandhi Ji.
    4. Hindutva is a way of life, being secular yet embracing your own faith
    this is all based on a unbiased standpoint, and its not like i support any particular party.... Also, the development schemes launched by PM Modi where available to both underprivileged Hindus and Muslims.

    • @JohnCooganPlus
      @JohnCooganPlus  11 місяців тому +2

      Good points! Thanks for sharing the extra information. This one was very tricky to research and I was hoping to nail it all but this is a complex topic. Appreciate the extra context!

    • @arnavvashisth6489
      @arnavvashisth6489 11 місяців тому +1

      ​​@@JohnCooganPlusThanks. I appreciate that westerners listen to the opinion of citizens actually living in that country. This is true democracy. It can be difficult to understand topics with two extremes.

    • @nehalkatre7691
      @nehalkatre7691 11 місяців тому

      ​@@JohnCooganPlusmy dear if u dont understand it full then you don't do it. U dissoppinted me, sorry...

  • @stefano1405
    @stefano1405 11 місяців тому +2

    In doing research atleast you should have talked to Abhijit iyer mitra he would have cleared much of your misinformation!

  • @Gaurav_9339
    @Gaurav_9339 11 місяців тому +4

    5 seconds in I opened the chat and I am going to save my time by not watching it further.

  • @aditya7069
    @aditya7069 11 місяців тому +4

    Well modi is trailer’ yogi is movie

  • @invertedaura1986
    @invertedaura1986 11 місяців тому +11

    I can't say this enough. Modi was cleared by TWO seperate supreme court benches from two different goverments regarding the Godhra violence. What else must a man do to prove his innocence?

    • @shasha0076
      @shasha0076 10 місяців тому

      No point in explaining this to the world. They hv their own propoganda or view that he did it just like muslims had it. When they say let them prove it n someone proves they are right in the courts these guys will start denying the law n investigation too just bcoz its not aligned with their propoganda 🤣🤦

  • @animeshtiwari9385
    @animeshtiwari9385 11 місяців тому +4

    c'mon man do a bit more accurate research...the points about the surgical strikes were based on very surface level data...the locals in balakot and POK , themselves confirmed the air strike and then later...pakistani leaders themselves

  • @chadj1797
    @chadj1797 11 місяців тому +10

    I myself am old enough to remember how the terrorists used to slay alot of hindus every 2nd week in riots or bomb attacks Pre-BJP era it was truly an horrifying condition. But post 2014 they couldn't do a single bombing in mainland India. No wonder they are always targeting BJP. Mlecchas have no place in this holy sub continent of Lord Indra.

    • @premanandamishra7470
      @premanandamishra7470 11 місяців тому +1

      bro hindus bombed masjid u forgot?

    • @hindu_1188
      @hindu_1188 11 місяців тому

      ​@@premanandamishra7470love it , want more of it

  • @rajasekharnaidu7231
    @rajasekharnaidu7231 11 місяців тому +3

    its always funny to see westerners teaching Indian history with so many inaccuracies and western biases.

  • @bettertube
    @bettertube 11 місяців тому +4

    If you wanna understand about india and indian topics, listen to indian people rather than westerners

  • @pirateluffy01
    @pirateluffy01 11 місяців тому +4

    Dhruv Rathee if you are watching this comment down below 😅

  • @ninum4u
    @ninum4u 11 місяців тому +13

    The info regarding RSS is incorrect
    Nathuram Godse , MK Gandhi's assassin was not an active member of RSS
    Secondly HINDUTVA doesn't mean you need to be a Hindu to be a RSS member , you also have a MRM ( Muslim Rashtriya Manch) wing of RSS

  • @eyesight1071
    @eyesight1071 11 місяців тому +4

    Some point are made out of thin air.

  • @Mkayou
    @Mkayou 11 місяців тому +2

    First line about RSS you got it wrong!!

  • @Dr.Vichitra_101
    @Dr.Vichitra_101 10 місяців тому +4

    In order to be an Indian you have to be Hindu and we all say that every person who is in the south of the Himalayas or Sindhu River is a Hindu. Correct the fact please 🙏

  • @rutz893
    @rutz893 11 місяців тому +3

    Bro sangh parivar is rss. and it is not paramilitary. they dont have weapons

  • @pavanvenkat9182
    @pavanvenkat9182 11 місяців тому +75

    Immediately after partition there where at-least 20 percent of Hindu population in Pakistan but now there are only 2 percent left . Due to this religious prosecution of Hindus in other countries there is a need to CAA .

    • @mefisto05s.20
      @mefisto05s.20 11 місяців тому +14

      Not to mention the persecution of Hindus within India itself and the anti Hindu laws that still exist in India.

    • @theriam6281
      @theriam6281 11 місяців тому +1

      Not just Pakistan. Even Bangladesh

  • @tivo3720
    @tivo3720 11 місяців тому +3

    Oh no its the congress leader and party members who attacked sikhs not the Hindus. All the sikh Gurus born in Hindu family Never ever changed their religion. Protected the Hindus and sanatana Dharma 🕉️ .

  • @MonilModi10
    @MonilModi10 10 місяців тому +3

    We Hindus have only one country in the world and it is such a disgrace that we literarily had to beg for lord ram's temple, Modi ji came as an angel, who finally resolved the problem. He will be blessed eternally for this particular work.