Both Calvin Klein and Stonehenge have signed with Ador. Both brands follow the official NewJeans account and do not follow the girls' fake account. The money is going to Ador, don't worry.
Unless the brand deals were signed with the companies pre-injunction, then ADOR/HYBE, from a purely business aspect, must sue any brand that signs NJ independently. If they don't, then they open up the floodgates for brands/advertisers to sidestep legal channels, because any such deals/contracts are with the companies, and not the artists... Artists and advertisers are on an equal contractual playing field under the companies. If ADOR/HYBE do not sue, then chances are, the deals were signed before the injunction.
i dont think company can sue brand/advertiser. they free to sign with whoever they want, unless there is law in korea stated that. the only problem will be contract ador and new jeans. lets say, there is clause in contract stated brand/advertiser must sign with company to use idol or brand/advertiser cannot sign directly with idol, then the fault will fall under idol. brand/advertiser can play innocent saying they dont know anything about new jeans and ador contract. this can lead to alot of breaking contract and penalty if contract still valid (which court didnt decide yet). this is the reason why ador trying to do the injunction.
@@QQ-xn2tj No, advertisers can't entirely play innocent. it most likely won't work in court especially when this whole thing is so public. The court will blame them for not doing their due diligence of finding out simply by contacting the company. And even then, they wouldn't want to deal with a lawsuit from a big company anyway.
@@hanimcko newjeans brand name, songs n content is owned by ador. However ador dont own girls as individual artists . Brands n girls can work without using newjeans name n anything related to newjeans.
@@maggie198333 yall are coping so hard lmfao 😭 if ck is signed under ador then it would've been a breach of contract if their recent campaigns did not credit the name newjeans whatsoever lol
Stonehenge already clarified the contract is under ADOR and that they discussed it with them 1st...CK is the same..NJs are using mediaplay, as always...ADOR is still getting paid...
If I rolled my eyes any harder, they'd have fallen out of my head. I can't wait for the inevitable tantrum when they're told no, you're not independent artists. You're under contract, now pay the penalty, and you can be free.
I would side with anyone but mhj. For me nj is just her another versions or pet she is using dor her own good. So I'm defending not siding or supporting the bs of that woman.
I’m still trying to understand how folks are not getting it that NOBODY wants them back with ador. Nobody is in these comment sections actually fighting or arguing or just leaving opinions because they want them back with ador. It’s always been about leaving ador LEGALLY and just saying “bye” at a press conference is not legally binding - not legally cancelling the contract. We all want them gone for very different reasons but even that is besides the point. People comment and reply to folks as if we are fighting for them to stay cuz we want them to stay… that’s not it and hasn’t ever been the case. We don’t care what exactly happens to them as a group, they can go do whatever they want “independently” (which is a joke cuz they won’t be doing anything for themselves musically tbh, they just won’t so this whole “independent” shit is ridiculous.. they could just be truthful and say they want MHJ to give them whatever identity she can give them but I digress).. just do it legally and be on your way to your supposed independence. This has never been about staying as they were gonna leave as soon as MHJ was gone anyways - we ALL knew that.
I think the "people" u're thinking of, who don't seem to get it, are the "people" supporting the Min-Hee-Jeans. Hv u noticed no matter how numerous of times the issues are patiently explained to this "people", they choose to ignore as they can't defend the indefensible? Sadly those "people" hv the same level of maturity & IQ as that whole MHJ bunch.
Yes we all know that the problem is some brands choosing to remove the NewJeans branding name completely it sells a false image to the public and makes it look like it’s independent when you only use their individual names for an ad campaign it’s a mediaplay to show that their powerful without the name NewJeans attached
@@purpleskiesforevernewjeans brand name, songs n content is owned by ador. However ador dont own girls as individual artists . Brands n girls can work without using newjeans name n anything related to newjeans.
@@ketkikul8739 this is an interesting take, still these girls are not being careful but careless. they kept instigating worse scenarios... the brans will say yes of course - its all about what they get in the bottom line. At this time NJ is hot because of all these drama that is why they are taking advantage of this opportunity to generate $$$ as much until NJ falls down. It is all about business, not personal. They see a money making opportunity from this K dram and this loop hole is allowing that. We shall see, these are all premature events before the main one.
1. Both Calvin Klein and Stonehenge are signed to Ador. Both brands follow the official NewJeans account and do not follow the fake account of the girls. The money is going to Ador, do not worry. 2. The brand is required by law to honor the contract between the artist and the agency. It cannot pretend not to know, because the existence of the contracts is public knowledge. In any case, even if by some absurd hypothesis the brand signed with an artist without knowing that she has an agency, ignorance would not be considered an excuse in court, because learning about these things is part of due diligence. So the brand should still pay the compensation, without any discount. 3. The name NJ was removed from events and advertisements thanks to a concession from Ador. If Ador had not granted it, the situation with NJ would have become more embittered and that is not what Ador wants. Also, to do the shootings, the girls' cooperation is necessary, and if the girls don't cooperate, the agency will have to pay a penalty to the brand. 4. The girls can't do ANYTHING without the agency's permission, get this nonsense out of your head. 5. Omega and Vogue have ALWAYS acted in agreement with the agency, which is why they haven't been reported. Not only that, but their ads were published by Ador on the official NJ account. Omega follows both the NJ account and the JFF account.
The girls and Min Heejin became insolent. Lawyers and lawyers of the company Ador and Haib are too kind. We need to be stricter and tougher, file several more lawsuits against the criminal conspiracy of these scammers Min Heejin and New Jeans.
It’s the same person who leaked their first one months ago before it came out with CK days later so I guess just gotta see if it follows that same pattern most likely is but it is very real
@@hanimckonot, it’s the same page that upload the audio between a hybe marketing officer and the journalist who wanted to report wrong sale figures. The track record is very telling
Apparently the Calvin Klein thing was a leak which means the campaign is about to released because that’s how their first ever Calvin Klein Campaign came out too it leaked then CK released it few days later I’m surprised advertisers are playing this game with NewJeans it’s no reason for Calvin Klein to remove the NewJeans branding it’s just like Vogue Korea
Most propably they signed it before they're are not using the group name for legal purposes and contracts can't be terminated by the word of mouth they should know it and ck brand deal happened before the injunction
The name NJ was removed from events and advertisements thanks to a concession from Ador. If Ador had not granted it, the situation with NJ would have become more embittered and that is not what Ador wants. Also, to do the shootings, the girls' cooperation is necessary, and if the girls don't cooperate, the agency will have to pay a penalty to the brand.
You are misinforming people again. The Calvin Klein photo was NOT published officially. It was posted by a fan account on Chinese Weibo. It has now been deleted. IF CK is still going ahead with this campaign, they are YET to publish it. The five names were placed there by their fans.
@@XiwanglooLet us see what? Can you see the photos on any of Calvin Klein’s official pages? CK have YET to publish it. What you are reporting was a LEAK. Bu definition NOT official. Spring Summer collection usually starts campaigning in Feb/Mar. “The same account that leaked NewJeans' Calvin Klein photos is the one that previously leaked an audio recording of a conversation between HYBE and Jang Hyung-woo. This recording included a request for corrections regarding Japanese album sales (actual sales of 50,000 copies vs. 1 million reported in the media). Some theories suggest that MHJ may have been involved in leaking the Calvin Klein photos. It is said that content from a canceled UA-cam video was repurposed, replacing the name 'NewJeans' with individual members' names, and then distributed to the same account that had previously spread false claims regarding the Jang Hyung-woo incident. Some argue that if these photos were official, they would have been posted on *jeanzforfree* rather than on a fan account.” This leak has now been deleted from the same fan account on Weibo.
To everyone saying the Calvin Klein Campaign is fake because it was leaked on a Chinese account I’m here to tell you that their first ever Calvin Klein campaign was also released on a Chinese account a week before CK put it out officially
so interesting - this new add campaign is not on CK's social media. hmmmmm.... makes sense if it was a leak. this was the content Ador did not want to release for NJ due to internal and external matters. Drama drama drama. Sit back & watch.
Well the ck compaign is literally cancelled do u really think they will go again hybe that has bh and where jk signed contract with him the one who ACTUALLY brings the MONEY and likes
They are still doing activities?? I thought they said they would end it fr fr in 2025? I’ve been seeing ppl say that they concluded all of their pre planned activities
Those brands deal goes through ador. But, girls have stated clearly they not want to return to hybe/ador. I'm not sure what their demand is, 100% they will not be able to use new jeans name anymore. New jeans never die will forever die. R.I.P
You can already imagine how the five and their fans will watch the Bunnys when it becomes clear that they are breaking their contracts and helping to build something, and that the contracts are still valid and that they have knowingly broken their contracts the whole time, because you don't just end a contract by saying it's over now, you have to do it in writing and legally, even if it was done in writing.😂😂😂😂😂🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
This was an unofficial edit. There were grammatical errors, all 5 names were on photos where there were only two members (editorials only post the names of the subjects on a particular photo), and the names on literally every photo, were not respective to the order of the subjects. ALL signs that this was not professionally done. CK is known more for their ads than for their brand....they would NOT make those mistakes. Plus these photos were taken in September. These are either stills to an ad video, or behind the scenes. Photos were taken down and apology was made, and disclaimer that future photos posted would be deleted. Someone obviously got a talking-to.
Both Calvin Klein and Stonehenge are signed to Ador. Both brands follow the official NewJeans account and do not follow the fake account of the girls. The money is going to Ador, do not worry.
Aside from the fact that it calls Bullshit on the claim no one will want to work with the girls, it does throw up an interesting wrinkle - if the girls are acting under their own names, are they still legally New Jeans if the five of them perform together? The Brands can quite truthfully state they signed the individual members, not the group, and if people want to still think of them as New Jeans, that's not on them. Plus, now that they have major brands behind them with skin in the game, Hybe has to understand that they would jeopardize any deals they might to make in the future for other Hybe groups if they attack the Brands for signing the girls, as well as costing the Brands money if they put the girls out off commission. This is definitely a frustrating Knight move on the girls' part. I love it...
Вы считаете, что "бренды" будут рисковать ради "джинсов" возможными контрактами с БТС? (Ну возможно маленькая и мало извесная, чтобы всплыть на хапе скандала...)😅
for me, it a stupid move. if the contract still valid, the faults will fall under girls, not brands. brand dont really care about u as long as they making money. i dont think company can do anything to brand either. this is why better stay safe and resolve their contract issue first.
This will depend on the injunction result that Hybe has filed. If the court rules against NJ, then NJ will be deemed to be still under contract with Hybe and whatever independent deals with advertisers may not be considered valid, or at least against the contract with Hybe. Hybe will then be able to seek reparation against these advertisers. If the courts rules against Hybe, NJ will be free to do whatever they like.
Nahh brands dont work like that ,the other groups or future group wont have problem they still are untapped market ,promoters and bring customers but here nj wanting to keep the same name instead of announcement of new group or individual artist they might have these brands not dealing or apporaching them .theres a reason a brand associating with individual artists will drop the artist at the drop of a hat if the artist involves in anything that brings bad promotion to them
Y’all the Calvin Klein campaign is real the new photos didn’t just come out of thin air it was just leaked now we see if it releases in the next week like their first one did
Fake news. Those photos were uploaded on a fan page on Weibo. So badly edited that even the names had typos. They’ll loose the CK contract real quick if they keep doing s&/t like that
It’s not a fake campaign those photos are never seen before until now and there isn’t any typos it’s just a leak NewJeans Calvin Klein is still currently in stores they are probably about to swap the ads for new ones we’ll see in the next week that’s how the first one came out as well it was released on Weibo first
NewJeans first ever CK campaign was also leaked on Weibo before it came out on CK days later by that account they are legit it ain’t fake we just gotta see if it releases days later like last time
It’s real they are never before seen photos and no the names don’t have typos their names are correct they are probably gearing up for a 2025 campaign but changed stuff at NewJeans request that’s still their global ambassadors
These girls are beautiful..angelic beauty no company is gonna drop them cos those companies are owned by old desperate men Thats how men are rich or poor theyll sacrifice anything for to be close to beautiful women ...calvin Klein same thing they wont drop these girls
I guess the recent CK photo shoot was done under the name NewJeans. Otherwise Minji would not have uploaded her photo with a reluctant message on her phone "그래도 해야지 어떡해", something like “Even if it’s tough/I don't want to do it, I still have to do it.” if translated into English. Regardless of her legal situation, it is an extremely unprofessional act to her client, Calvin Klein, because she is expected to do her best to abide by the previously signed contract.
Brand deals don't care about the injection on them coz they all know n it was even said by one of top law firm that new jeans has legally terminated their contract. Given the 14 days trial . It was clearly stated in the ador/hybe agreement so why are they fighting for them . Just set them free .
You think brands are going to take the chance while it's still in the courts? No, cause any money generated from an illegal contract will just have to be paid back, plus more, when the agency sues the brand. I'm sure all of this was done through Ador last year.
They responded within that time frame and newjeans were mad they couldn’t have MHJ back as they can’t do anything without her. And everything else was beyond ridiculous. You also know that more than one lawyer have spoken about this situation and said nothing they demanded could be enough to terminate their contract the way they did…. Ya know, not legally. Be for real, take in ALL info and ALL opinions - not just the ones you like for the narrative you prefer. Contracts are legally binding papers, gotta be broken officially LEGALLY. At least they finally took that “independent” step to hire lawyers.. took months but hey, they got there!
@@aloboyeptho6304 cry about what exactly? You don’t even know the actual facts of this case how do you know who’s gonna win? Do you even know what’s actually going on or are you just closing your eyes and ears to the facts you don’t want to be true?
Oh yeah wait MONTHS to fight legally over something allegedly so bad they can’t deal with it like the independent adults they claim to be. Oh yeah they’re THE group to follow for raising voices up for themselves.. oh wait, they truly didn’t fight for themselves or raise their voices for themselves at all, it was for MHJ who has them convinced they’re nothing without her. Perfect example of what NOT to do when you supposedly have so much proof to end a contract LEGALLY and never do it. Y’all can’t be this stupid.. legit cannot be.. smfh.
Respect to NEW JEANS , ARTIST THAT IS FIGHTING FOR THEIR RIGHTS !!! that's what i want to see and change in so called korea music industry, mistreating idols , not defending idols privacy.. so on . A r@@@pist can live laugh happily but not an artist who wants nothing but their rights in the company. Not a fan of new jeans but after this incident I'm so proud of them n stan them atm🎉 . Not forgetting now other artists are also shading that big fat guy . 🔥
@@aloboyeptho6304 They should stop acting immature and wait five years until the contract ends, and then move to another company. Instead of that, they decided to cause this mess. Sorry, but I can't stand NJ. Those troublemakers deserve to be punished..
Not being a slave doesn't mean you can do whatever you want. Especially if it personally or financially impacts others. I am not a slave, but I cannot go and rob a bank. Let me yell at the cops "I'm not a slave" as they are dragging me away in handcuffs LMAO. You NJ fans are delusional. You really think these chicks should just have carte blanche to do what they want just bc YOU like them. Sorry, but for the rest of us in this solar system, the planets + Pluto do not revolve around NJs.
Tokkis think campaigns and brand deals are made and shoots are done in days/weeks.. it takes months to finalize so these deals were made before they "ended" their contracts..
It’s not about that I know it’s under Ador I’m just curious why these brands are removing NewJeans branding it’s exactly like what Vogue Korea did it makes it look independent like a mediaplay
@@hanimcko honestly it's business to these brands and no matter which publicity negative or positive is publicity to them and ain't this " they r now independent" a hot topic??
@@NiveditaPathania-bg1bdyeah true they know simply that will generate a massive buzz brands just play on the money side and they found a way to do it legally as long as Ador is getting a cut I guess it doesn’t matter if they remove the branding
Both Calvin Klein and Stonehenge have signed with Ador. Both brands follow the official NewJeans account and do not follow the girls' fake account. The money is going to Ador, don't worry.
Unless the brand deals were signed with the companies pre-injunction, then ADOR/HYBE, from a purely business aspect, must sue any brand that signs NJ independently. If they don't, then they open up the floodgates for brands/advertisers to sidestep legal channels, because any such deals/contracts are with the companies, and not the artists... Artists and advertisers are on an equal contractual playing field under the companies. If ADOR/HYBE do not sue, then chances are, the deals were signed before the injunction.
i dont think company can sue brand/advertiser. they free to sign with whoever they want, unless there is law in korea stated that. the only problem will be contract ador and new jeans. lets say, there is clause in contract stated brand/advertiser must sign with company to use idol or brand/advertiser cannot sign directly with idol, then the fault will fall under idol. brand/advertiser can play innocent saying they dont know anything about new jeans and ador contract. this can lead to alot of breaking contract and penalty if contract still valid (which court didnt decide yet). this is the reason why ador trying to do the injunction.
@@QQ-xn2tj No, advertisers can't entirely play innocent. it most likely won't work in court especially when this whole thing is so public. The court will blame them for not doing their due diligence of finding out simply by contacting the company. And even then, they wouldn't want to deal with a lawsuit from a big company anyway.
Do you have any reasoning why their brands remove the NewJeans name?
@@hanimcko It's a mystery. I guess we'll eventually find out
@@hanimcko newjeans brand name, songs n content is owned by ador. However ador dont own girls as individual artists . Brands n girls can work without using newjeans name n anything related to newjeans.
These brand contracts are usually negotiated many months before release. I think these deals are signed under ADOR.
Res je!
Stonehenge already clarified the contract is under ADOR and that they discussed it with them 1st...CK is the same..
@@maggie198333 yall are coping so hard lmfao 😭 if ck is signed under ador then it would've been a breach of contract if their recent campaigns did not credit the name newjeans whatsoever lol
The brands cleared it up that this was pre legal battle signed with ador
Stonehenge already clarified the contract is under ADOR and that they discussed it with them 1st...CK is the same..NJs are using mediaplay, as always...ADOR is still getting paid...
If I rolled my eyes any harder, they'd have fallen out of my head.
I can't wait for the inevitable tantrum when they're told no, you're not independent artists. You're under contract, now pay the penalty, and you can be free.
Pay the free and they Finally get Blacklisted Hopefully
@@IamJerryTV_0802you, grown person you are, wishing kids to be blacklisted is actually crazy
I would side with anyone but mhj. For me nj is just her another versions or pet she is using dor her own good. So I'm defending not siding or supporting the bs of that woman.
I’m still trying to understand how folks are not getting it that NOBODY wants them back with ador. Nobody is in these comment sections actually fighting or arguing or just leaving opinions because they want them back with ador. It’s always been about leaving ador LEGALLY and just saying “bye” at a press conference is not legally binding - not legally cancelling the contract. We all want them gone for very different reasons but even that is besides the point. People comment and reply to folks as if we are fighting for them to stay cuz we want them to stay… that’s not it and hasn’t ever been the case. We don’t care what exactly happens to them as a group, they can go do whatever they want “independently” (which is a joke cuz they won’t be doing anything for themselves musically tbh, they just won’t so this whole “independent” shit is ridiculous.. they could just be truthful and say they want MHJ to give them whatever identity she can give them but I digress).. just do it legally and be on your way to your supposed independence. This has never been about staying as they were gonna leave as soon as MHJ was gone anyways - we ALL knew that.
I think the "people" u're thinking of, who don't seem to get it, are the "people" supporting the Min-Hee-Jeans. Hv u noticed no matter how numerous of times the issues are patiently explained to this "people", they choose to ignore as they can't defend the indefensible? Sadly those "people" hv the same level of maturity & IQ as that whole MHJ bunch.
CK and Stonehenge contracts were secured I under ADOR.
Yes we all know that the problem is some brands choosing to remove the NewJeans branding name completely it sells a false image to the public and makes it look like it’s independent when you only use their individual names for an ad campaign it’s a mediaplay to show that their powerful without the name NewJeans attached
@@hanimckoI'd love to know why the brands agreed to using individual names. Vogue and CK hasn't said a word
@@hanimckomaybe they kept it under embargo maybe to prevent any legal trouble happening between ck and hybe
@@purpleskiesforevernewjeans brand name, songs n content is owned by ador. However ador dont own girls as individual artists . Brands n girls can work without using newjeans name n anything related to newjeans.
@@ketkikul8739 this is an interesting take, still these girls are not being careful but careless. they kept instigating worse scenarios... the brans will say yes of course - its all about what they get in the bottom line. At this time NJ is hot because of all these drama that is why they are taking advantage of this opportunity to generate $$$ as much until NJ falls down. It is all about business, not personal. They see a money making opportunity from this K dram and this loop hole is allowing that. We shall see, these are all premature events before the main one.
From what I understand each member of New Jeans has an individual management contract with ADOR. They don’t have a single New Jeans contract.
Stoneghedge was signed with ador
1. Both Calvin Klein and Stonehenge are signed to Ador. Both brands follow the official NewJeans account and do not follow the fake account of the girls. The money is going to Ador, do not worry.
2. The brand is required by law to honor the contract between the artist and the agency. It cannot pretend not to know, because the existence of the contracts is public knowledge. In any case, even if by some absurd hypothesis the brand signed with an artist without knowing that she has an agency, ignorance would not be considered an excuse in court, because learning about these things is part of due diligence. So the brand should still pay the compensation, without any discount.
3. The name NJ was removed from events and advertisements thanks to a concession from Ador. If Ador had not granted it, the situation with NJ would have become more embittered and that is not what Ador wants. Also, to do the shootings, the girls' cooperation is necessary, and if the girls don't cooperate, the agency will have to pay a penalty to the brand.
4. The girls can't do ANYTHING without the agency's permission, get this nonsense out of your head.
5. Omega and Vogue have ALWAYS acted in agreement with the agency, which is why they haven't been reported. Not only that, but their ads were published by Ador on the official NJ account. Omega follows both the NJ account and the JFF account.
The girls and Min Heejin became insolent. Lawyers and lawyers of the company Ador and Haib are too kind. We need to be stricter and tougher, file several more lawsuits against the criminal conspiracy of these scammers Min Heejin and New Jeans.
Who wants to deal with them when their agency can't even find them!
I think you need to understand that it was a Chinese fan base that leaked it so now 1 nos what is going on with it
It’s the same person who leaked their first one months ago before it came out with CK days later so I guess just gotta see if it follows that same pattern most likely is but it is very real
@@hanimckonot, it’s the same page that upload the audio between a hybe marketing officer and the journalist who wanted to report wrong sale figures. The track record is very telling
@@noca2002yeah that’s also the same account that leaked the first Calvin Klein campaign days before it came out months ago it’s called NewJeans_R
@@noca2002yep that’s the same one who leaked the CK campaign last time days before it came out officially
Being a female and being beautiful will get u places ... nothing will ever happen to newjeans even the courts are gonna side with them
No me interesa tomar el lado de nadie, pero es obvio que ex NJ están mal y tienen que PAGAR LA MULTA Y dejar de ventilar a la prensa.
Apparently the Calvin Klein thing was a leak which means the campaign is about to released because that’s how their first ever Calvin Klein Campaign came out too it leaked then CK released it few days later I’m surprised advertisers are playing this game with NewJeans it’s no reason for Calvin Klein to remove the NewJeans branding it’s just like Vogue Korea
CK have bigger contracts to worry about. They have JK and Minkyu, so they’ll have to treat this issue carefully
Most propably they signed it before they're are not using the group name for legal purposes and contracts can't be terminated by the word of mouth they should know it and ck brand deal happened before the injunction
@@noca2002 exactly they are not gonna throw away someone who bring millions of dollars for nj especially not jk he is lite their biggest ambassador
The name NJ was removed from events and advertisements thanks to a concession from Ador. If Ador had not granted it, the situation with NJ would have become more embittered and that is not what Ador wants. Also, to do the shootings, the girls' cooperation is necessary, and if the girls don't cooperate, the agency will have to pay a penalty to the brand.
@@bqanto and the girls can't get paid if they don't shoot the ad
You are misinforming people again. The Calvin Klein photo was NOT published officially. It was posted by a fan account on Chinese Weibo. It has now been deleted. IF CK is still going ahead with this campaign, they are YET to publish it. The five names were placed there by their fans.
Let’s see
@@XiwanglooLet us see what? Can you see the photos on any of Calvin Klein’s official pages? CK have YET to publish it. What you are reporting was a LEAK. Bu definition NOT official.
Spring Summer collection usually starts campaigning in Feb/Mar.
“The same account that leaked NewJeans' Calvin Klein photos is the one that previously leaked an audio recording of a conversation between HYBE and Jang Hyung-woo. This recording included a request for corrections regarding Japanese album sales (actual sales of 50,000 copies vs. 1 million reported in the media).
Some theories suggest that MHJ may have been involved in leaking the Calvin Klein photos.
It is said that content from a canceled UA-cam video was repurposed, replacing the name 'NewJeans' with individual members' names, and then distributed to the same account that had previously spread false claims regarding the Jang Hyung-woo incident.
Some argue that if these photos were official, they would have been posted on *jeanzforfree* rather than on a fan account.”
This leak has now been deleted from the same fan account on Weibo.
@HailToTheMeep
Her motto is NJ misinformation.....that's why all her high clicks clips are NJ related...
Even Stevie Wonder can see this! 🤦♂️
To everyone saying the Calvin Klein Campaign is fake because it was leaked on a Chinese account I’m here to tell you that their first ever Calvin Klein campaign was also released on a Chinese account a week before CK put it out officially
so interesting - this new add campaign is not on CK's social media. hmmmmm.... makes sense if it was a leak. this was the content Ador did not want to release for NJ due to internal and external matters. Drama drama drama. Sit back & watch.
Well the ck compaign is literally cancelled do u really think they will go again hybe that has bh and where jk signed contract with him the one who ACTUALLY brings the MONEY and likes
Vsi vemo, da so Kitajci dobri v ponaredkih ter goljufijah.
They are still doing activities?? I thought they said they would end it fr fr in 2025? I’ve been seeing ppl say that they concluded all of their pre planned activities
Those brands deal goes through ador. But, girls have stated clearly they not want to return to hybe/ador. I'm not sure what their demand is, 100% they will not be able to use new jeans name anymore. New jeans never die will forever die. R.I.P
You can already imagine how the five and their fans will watch the Bunnys when it becomes clear that they are breaking their contracts and helping to build something, and that the contracts are still valid and that they have knowingly broken their contracts the whole time, because you don't just end a contract by saying it's over now, you have to do it in writing and legally, even if it was done in writing.😂😂😂😂😂🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
it is just a matter of time. for now, let them enjoy what they can. either way, there will be consequences for both parties.
MHJ's Puppets
@@AlexFil77 REAL
THEY he deal with Calvin Clien and stone hang deal were done before all the mess went down.
This was an unofficial edit. There were grammatical errors, all 5 names were on photos where there were only two members (editorials only post the names of the subjects on a particular photo), and the names on literally every photo, were not respective to the order of the subjects. ALL signs that this was not professionally done. CK is known more for their ads than for their brand....they would NOT make those mistakes. Plus these photos were taken in September. These are either stills to an ad video, or behind the scenes.
Photos were taken down and apology was made, and disclaimer that future photos posted would be deleted. Someone obviously got a talking-to.
Si es cierto lo de CK , es una decepción y espero que sean demandados .
Both Calvin Klein and Stonehenge are signed to Ador. Both brands follow the official NewJeans account and do not follow the fake account of the girls. The money is going to Ador, do not worry.
@@bqantoMe alegro, gracias por la información
Aside from the fact that it calls Bullshit on the claim no one will want to work with the girls, it does throw up an interesting wrinkle - if the girls are acting under their own names, are they still legally New Jeans if the five of them perform together? The Brands can quite truthfully state they signed the individual members, not the group, and if people want to still think of them as New Jeans, that's not on them. Plus, now that they have major brands behind them with skin in the game, Hybe has to understand that they would jeopardize any deals they might to make in the future for other Hybe groups if they attack the Brands for signing the girls, as well as costing the Brands money if they put the girls out off commission. This is definitely a frustrating Knight move on the girls' part. I love it...
Вы считаете, что "бренды" будут рисковать ради "джинсов" возможными контрактами с БТС? (Ну возможно маленькая и мало извесная, чтобы всплыть на хапе скандала...)😅
@@ОльгаГатилина-и1ц lol it's not like bts is the only group brands are after
for me, it a stupid move. if the contract still valid, the faults will fall under girls, not brands. brand dont really care about u as long as they making money. i dont think company can do anything to brand either. this is why better stay safe and resolve their contract issue first.
This will depend on the injunction result that Hybe has filed. If the court rules against NJ, then NJ will be deemed to be still under contract with Hybe and whatever independent deals with advertisers may not be considered valid, or at least against the contract with Hybe. Hybe will then be able to seek reparation against these advertisers. If the courts rules against Hybe, NJ will be free to do whatever they like.
Nahh brands dont work like that ,the other groups or future group wont have problem they still are untapped market ,promoters and bring customers but here nj wanting to keep the same name instead of announcement of new group or individual artist they might have these brands not dealing or apporaching them .theres a reason a brand associating with individual artists will drop the artist at the drop of a hat if the artist involves in anything that brings bad promotion to them
Y’all the Calvin Klein campaign is real the new photos didn’t just come out of thin air it was just leaked now we see if it releases in the next week like their first one did
Ck is bs, not surprised they are not being ethical w this one.
Fake news. Those photos were uploaded on a fan page on Weibo. So badly edited that even the names had typos. They’ll loose the CK contract real quick if they keep doing s&/t like that
It’s not a fake campaign those photos are never seen before until now and there isn’t any typos it’s just a leak NewJeans Calvin Klein is still currently in stores they are probably about to swap the ads for new ones we’ll see in the next week that’s how the first one came out as well it was released on Weibo first
NewJeans first ever CK campaign was also leaked on Weibo before it came out on CK days later by that account they are legit it ain’t fake we just gotta see if it releases days later like last time
It’s real they are never before seen photos and no the names don’t have typos their names are correct they are probably gearing up for a 2025 campaign but changed stuff at NewJeans request that’s still their global ambassadors
These girls are beautiful..angelic beauty no company is gonna drop them cos those companies are owned by old desperate men
Thats how men are rich or poor theyll sacrifice anything for to be close to beautiful women ...calvin Klein same thing they wont drop these girls
I guess the recent CK photo shoot was done under the name NewJeans. Otherwise Minji would not have uploaded her photo with a reluctant message on her phone "그래도 해야지 어떡해", something like “Even if it’s tough/I don't want to do it, I still have to do it.” if translated into English. Regardless of her legal situation, it is an extremely unprofessional act to her client, Calvin Klein, because she is expected to do her best to abide by the previously signed contract.
“Even brand deals stan with newjeans” well no actually they just want money.
I like your videos, but this was so very clearly a stonehenge promotion LMAO
The way NJ girls are starting to flex on ADOR. What is going on? :/
What flex? 😂
Hybe puppets keep crying 😂
Brand deals don't care about the injection on them coz they all know n it was even said by one of top law firm that new jeans has legally terminated their contract. Given the 14 days trial . It was clearly stated in the ador/hybe agreement so why are they fighting for them . Just set them free .
@@aloboyeptho6304 the way you just straight up lied here 🤣
You think brands are going to take the chance while it's still in the courts? No, cause any money generated from an illegal contract will just have to be paid back, plus more, when the agency sues the brand.
I'm sure all of this was done through Ador last year.
They responded within that time frame and newjeans were mad they couldn’t have MHJ back as they can’t do anything without her. And everything else was beyond ridiculous. You also know that more than one lawyer have spoken about this situation and said nothing they demanded could be enough to terminate their contract the way they did…. Ya know, not legally. Be for real, take in ALL info and ALL opinions - not just the ones you like for the narrative you prefer. Contracts are legally binding papers, gotta be broken officially LEGALLY. At least they finally took that “independent” step to hire lawyers.. took months but hey, they got there!
@@angrylittlemissred cry about it , let's see who wins this battle
@@aloboyeptho6304 cry about what exactly? You don’t even know the actual facts of this case how do you know who’s gonna win? Do you even know what’s actually going on or are you just closing your eyes and ears to the facts you don’t want to be true?
I support Newjeans, I don't support Min Hee Jin, know the difference netizens who make baseless assumptions
Tudi dekleta brez imena vam ni treba podpirati, ker so globoko padle skupaj s klopotačo.
@@KsenijaHajdu-x3g
We can support who ever we want!
Who are you to tell us what to do?
I'm siding with NJs too🤗💪🏻
Me too! 🙋♂️
The hate is forced on new jeans. They're the type of artist everyone should get inspired from to raise their rights and voices
They’re wrong
Oh yeah wait MONTHS to fight legally over something allegedly so bad they can’t deal with it like the independent adults they claim to be. Oh yeah they’re THE group to follow for raising voices up for themselves.. oh wait, they truly didn’t fight for themselves or raise their voices for themselves at all, it was for MHJ who has them convinced they’re nothing without her. Perfect example of what NOT to do when you supposedly have so much proof to end a contract LEGALLY and never do it.
Y’all can’t be this stupid.. legit cannot be.. smfh.
Raised their Voice by Demanding and entitled Arrogant brats? NO THANKS!
Kam gre prihodnost Koreje, če imajo takšno mladino, ki se zaletava v betonsko steno!
@@mami11420 Vi ste psihično bolni!
Respect to NEW JEANS , ARTIST THAT IS FIGHTING FOR THEIR RIGHTS !!! that's what i want to see and change in so called korea music industry, mistreating idols , not defending idols privacy.. so on . A r@@@pist can live laugh happily but not an artist who wants nothing but their rights in the company. Not a fan of new jeans but after this incident I'm so proud of them n stan them atm🎉 . Not forgetting now other artists are also shading that big fat guy . 🔥
Interesting.... But u forgot to mention that NJ can't even respect their new CEO
@@taetae1746 why would i even respect them when they couldn't even protect us
@@aloboyeptho6304 They should stop acting immature and wait five years until the contract ends, and then move to another company. Instead of that, they decided to cause this mess. Sorry, but I can't stand NJ. Those troublemakers deserve to be punished..
Opažam, da imate zelo mlečne možgane.
@@aloboyeptho6304 Pojdi v vrtec, kjer se igrajo otroci.
I am siding with NewJeans
Et alors on s'en fout
With the girls 🎉
@@toutoune6717lol cared enough to comment. Besides the creator of the video asked😅
HOW MUCH DID MHJ PAY YOU?
@@IamJerryTV_0802 how much did ador/hybe paid manipulated you?
Reminder that these young women are not slaves and are not property of Hybe.
If any company wants to work with them as individuals it can do so.
Potem so sužnji mame klopotače, ki si jih lasti.
Wrong. Each of them has signed an INDIVIDUAL contract with Ador, they are individually obligated, regardless of the group.
@@bqanto Leviticus 20 13
They're not slaves, but they are under contracts that they signed
Not being a slave doesn't mean you can do whatever you want. Especially if it personally or financially impacts others. I am not a slave, but I cannot go and rob a bank. Let me yell at the cops "I'm not a slave" as they are dragging me away in handcuffs LMAO. You NJ fans are delusional. You really think these chicks should just have carte blanche to do what they want just bc YOU like them. Sorry, but for the rest of us in this solar system, the planets + Pluto do not revolve around NJs.
뉴진스 화이팅!!! 💙🩷💛💚💜
I am siding with New jeans. Obviously.
Et puis??
Siding with Arrogant Entitled Liars Naive evil Bullies MHJ must pay you then
@@IamJerryTV_0802
Yes....all the bunnies are on her payroll! 😚
Tokkis think campaigns and brand deals are made and shoots are done in days/weeks.. it takes months to finalize so these deals were made before they "ended" their contracts..
It’s not about that I know it’s under Ador I’m just curious why these brands are removing NewJeans branding it’s exactly like what Vogue Korea did it makes it look independent like a mediaplay
@@hanimcko honestly it's business to these brands and no matter which publicity negative or positive is publicity to them and ain't this " they r now independent" a hot topic??
@@NiveditaPathania-bg1bd exactly and it's working
@@NiveditaPathania-bg1bdyeah true they know simply that will generate a massive buzz brands just play on the money side and they found a way to do it legally as long as Ador is getting a cut I guess it doesn’t matter if they remove the branding
@@hanimcko exactly....fans will think they are playing a hero by siding with them and for the brand.... it's money
So what's their new name? Old pants perhaps?