N779XW taxi test at Paine Field August 8, 2019. As the airplane enters the runway you can see the tail of WH007 777-9 for Emirates behind the Delivery Center.
stereogin the 777x wasn’t supposed to fly at any time last year because of engine issues The coolest it got to take off was a high speed taxi shown in this video as one of Boeing test for the aircraft
It's actually a braking test using the spoiler and service brakes, that's what the cloud of smoke was, they do this to all aircraft from the 737 to the 747, it's a pre-delivery test.
GE9X engines are a lot quieter than GE90-115B engines. The Boeing 777-300ER is such a revolutionary record- breaking twin wide-body aircraft (and has always been my favorite), and I hope the 8 and especially 9x do even better.
BEST OF THE BEST AIR CRAFTS EVER MADE ,,,,,,, BECAUSE OF THE EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE WHICH HAVE BEEN SUMMONED BY THE ENGINEERS OF BOEING TO BECOME 777 -9 FABULOUS ART .....
Nath D - GE9X sets world record as most powerful jet engine GE9X SETS WORLD RECORD AS MOST POWERFUL JET ENGINE AARON HILSZ-LOTHIANJULY 14, 2019 777XAVIATION NEWSBOEINGGENERAL ELECTRIC10 COMMENTS 1.2K The Guinness Book of World Records has officially declared the General Electric GE9X as the world’s most powerful jet engine! Already the world’s largest commercial jet engine, the GE9X is now the most powerful, maintaining 134,300 pounds of thrust during an engineering test on the 10th of November 2017. General Electric elected to announce the record with Guinness on the 12th of July 2019 as part of their 100-year celebration and most likely to keep their work protected. GE9X sets world record as most powerful jet engine GE9X Installation on the 777-9 The much loved GE90-115B that powers the Boeing 777-300ER was previously the record holder, proudly holding 127,900 pounds of thrust to its name during a test run in 2002. Guinness Notes the record is based on testing conditions and not commercial operation. Despite this impressive news the aircraft the GE9X will power, the Boeing 777X, will only have the engines rated to 105,000 pounds of thrust. However, this means larger and heavier variants can be developed with ease. GE9X sets world record as most powerful jet engine GE9X on the first Boeing 777-9 “While we didn’t set out to break the thrust Guinness World Record title, we are proud of the engine’s performance….” David Joyce, President and Chief Executive of GE Aviation The thrust capability demonstrated by the GE9X is several times more than the thrust of many fighter aircraft; it is also more than the rocket used in America’s first manned spaceflight, the Mercury-Redstone 3. Additionally the entire engine, paired with its case assembly, is as wide as the fuselage of a Boeing 737!
I'm an Airbus fan (apart from the 747) but I honestly think it's a shame about Boeing's situation becuase both times it's the engine manufacturers problem. Had the cfm leap 1b been lighter. The Trent 1000s not been rushed being developed and the ge9x had been engineered properly they might actually be ok (the 737 max crisis is the engines problem becuase the weight of them caused the mcas application)
The engines weren't actually that big of a problem for the 737 MAX. The 737 MAXs woes are due to faulty software code in the MCAS system and MCAS exists because of type rating issues between the 737 NG & 737 MAX. The KC-46 also has MCAS but it's had no issues because that MCAS was well-coded.
Quite right Harry. Those Safran Leap engines mounted foreward of the wing necessitated the installation of MCAS because they are too heavy and knocked out the aircrafts C of G. Why GE didnt engine the Max no one knows, probably because they couldnt supply the number of engines required or they lost the contract. You cant put powerful turbo fans on an old airframe with a short undercarriage. Engineers at Boeing must have known this. Itll be a long long time before the Max flys in its present configuration.
@@tonyjennings1025 certainly. I think in the effort to make the MAX have a capacity comparable to a widebody with 4 classes they pushed the core airframe of the 737 beyond it's limits the 737 was not set out to have upwards of 150 seats installed ,and in my opinion, they're starting to defeat the point of having a low capacity airliner I think had they'd stuck with what the 737 was meant to be and not over dk e the capacity they would've been better off.
@@haz525 Iam a retired airline employee. In the late 60's we took delivery of the 200 series of the 737. Right from the start it was a winner for us, plenty of payload and fast. But the Pratt & Whitney engines were noisy hush kitsch were the answer. Today Airbus got the jump on Boeing with the A320neo, you cannot modify an old airframe then rush it into service. Iam an old guy for years I flew all over the world, today because of the colossal loss of 346 souls Iam deeply saddened because the Max was not safe, and it wont be until some fundamental changes are made. For instance, has the MCAS software been modified. I dont know, this tragic disaster for Boeing will go on well into next year, I hope Iam wrong but I cant see a fix at this time.
I love Paine Field...its very unique, if you look in the background at 2:39 you'll see a P-51 Mustang taxiing. How often can a heavy experimental and a WWII warbird be caught in the same shot...
I guess you mean the wingtips.Because of the 777X massive wingspan,they can retract the wingtips so the aircraft has the wingspan of a regular 777 and it eases taxying and saves parking space
Great video! Not to be a dick, but why are the black borders surrounding the video included in the upload? My phone won't let me fit it to screen like other UA-cam videos because of this.
Not a rejected takeoff seeing as the first flight isn't until 2020 and the RTO tests won't come until well after that. Also, if they were planning to take off they would have put flaps down, which they didn't. The description makes good on this, and it's a 777X so I'm good with it. Nice video too!
Emirates boss said that Emirates won't be taking orders from Boeing Airbus etc...until they give Emirates what they promise...reliable aircraft that Boeing Airbus etc... promise
@@justanotheraviator2357 On military aircraft, maybe, but not in commercial aircraft. Hence the need for special condition's FAA request specific to this aircraft.
Sherman Couch I think probably flaps 1 or 5 otherwise the computer will be shouting at the pilot that the plane is not in take off configuration..... unless that can be overridden
@ Sherman Couch this is step one of a row of tests that approximate MTOW and V1 conditions - in case of problems, they do not want to destroy the plane, after all.
![Boeing 777X/777-9 [N779XW] Takeoffs and Landings at Portland Airport (PDX)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EValOO0Clyk/mqdefault.jpg)
![Boeing 777X/777-9 [N779XW] Takeoffs and Landings at Portland Airport (PDX)](/img/tr.png)
It wasn’t a rejected takeoff, it was the high speed taxi test
Yeah its a rejected takeoff
stereogin the 777x wasn’t supposed to fly at any time last year because of engine issues
The coolest it got to take off was a high speed taxi shown in this video as one of Boeing test for the aircraft
Oh ok
JRH3221 Gaming no
JRH3221 Gaming get your facts right buddy and think before you comment
I just came for the GE9X spool up
You can barely hear it
ART CORE i was so excited to hear the GE9X on the 777x but it’s too quiet
Speedbird 1 It doesn’t roar anymore like GE90 did. Oof.
Yea i noticed too but maybe its because we are listening to the sound frimmthe back and not front.
FlightFilms yeah lol. I hope it still has the distinctive GE90 roar. You gotta go there in person to truly experience it so 2020
Oof those brakes took one for the team
Obviously as part of a test
2:33 captain: waaaaaaaaaaait i forgot my wallet...
😂😂
Wife called asking when he is coming home... ok that’s a no go! Reject take off now😂😂
@@khairunsyazwin Lol
ここのコメ欄草
👌🏽
The pilots want to takeoff soo bad
Noah Philip ikr. Lol
But GE9X says "nope" 🙂
Ryan O. Yah exactly. Lol
It's actually a braking test using the spoiler and service brakes, that's what the cloud of smoke was, they do this to all aircraft from the 737 to the 747, it's a pre-delivery test.
Charles Damery I know but we all want to see it fly
girl named takeoff be like :
😭😭😭😭😭😭
xD
GE9X engines are a lot quieter than GE90-115B engines.
The Boeing 777-300ER is such a revolutionary record- breaking twin wide-body aircraft (and has always been my favorite), and I hope the 8 and especially 9x do even better.
Great video.☺️
Great vid! Can even see the wingtips rising at the end.
The most beautiful airplane everytime, 777 forever
Most beautiful is the Concorde
@@souissi1 Am I the only one who thinks that the 787 looks better than the Concorde?
@@DorianTMChannel you are not the only one
Yeah comparing to 787 and A350 faces, much better
Beautiful aircraft. It sure will be tested.
phillip The 777X IS being tested !!!! You just watched one in the video !!!! DUUUUUHH!!!!!!!!
Don't take notice of Wilbur, he is just an obnoxious troll. Loves to pretend he has greater knowledge than everyone else.
@@shebbs1 Thanks, common sense. Also, he looks like he's being sarcastic.
2:33 ….Shit. Did I leave the stove on?
My favorite twin-engine airplane !!!!!!!!!
massive engine , can't wait to see what happens when they get to fly, and the sounds of the new engines. 😎
BEST OF THE BEST AIR CRAFTS EVER MADE ,,,,,,,
BECAUSE OF THE EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE WHICH HAVE BEEN SUMMONED BY THE ENGINEERS OF BOEING TO BECOME 777 -9 FABULOUS ART .....
true aviation geeks have full volume
@@BGI_guy what the fuck.
True aviation geeks don’t wanna lose their hearing
True aviation geeks don't want to wake up their parents at night while they're having planegasms
I love you
@@IntellectualHazard good to know i'm not the only one who has "planegasms" lol
Holy moley those new engines barely fit under the wing!
Such an iconic folding wing tips!!!!
I was just thinking... I'll bet it's going to be an iconic image, like the hump on the 747.
Adam Keeney yeah!!! 💯💪🏼
Those engines sure look powerful, shaking the craft..
They're actually not as powerful as the GE90's on the 777-300ER
Nath D - GE9X sets world record as most powerful jet engine
GE9X SETS WORLD RECORD AS MOST POWERFUL JET ENGINE
AARON HILSZ-LOTHIANJULY 14, 2019
777XAVIATION NEWSBOEINGGENERAL ELECTRIC10 COMMENTS
1.2K
The Guinness Book of World Records has officially declared the General Electric GE9X as the world’s most powerful jet engine!
Already the world’s largest commercial jet engine, the GE9X is now the most powerful, maintaining 134,300 pounds of thrust during an engineering test on the 10th of November 2017.
General Electric elected to announce the record with Guinness on the 12th of July 2019 as part of their 100-year celebration and most likely to keep their work protected.
GE9X sets world record as most powerful jet engine
GE9X Installation on the 777-9
The much loved GE90-115B that powers the Boeing 777-300ER was previously the record holder, proudly holding 127,900 pounds of thrust to its name during a test run in 2002.
Guinness Notes the record is based on testing conditions and not commercial operation.
Despite this impressive news the aircraft the GE9X will power, the Boeing 777X, will only have the engines rated to 105,000 pounds of thrust. However, this means larger and heavier variants can be developed with ease.
GE9X sets world record as most powerful jet engine
GE9X on the first Boeing 777-9
“While we didn’t set out to break the thrust Guinness World Record title, we are proud of the engine’s performance….”
David Joyce, President and Chief Executive of GE Aviation
The thrust capability demonstrated by the GE9X is several times more than the thrust of many fighter aircraft; it is also more than the rocket used in America’s first manned spaceflight, the Mercury-Redstone 3.
Additionally the entire engine, paired with its case assembly, is as wide as the fuselage of a Boeing 737!
@@nathd1748 The undisputed king GE90 , 777 Is one of the coolest aircraft..
@@dream8178 I actually find it quite bland to look at. The 757 is way cooler!
Everybody screaming about the tail wobble! It’s normal on the 777 because of the large engines!!!
Tail wobble? All i see is rudder
Tim Curtis I think he meant elevator wobble
Amazing wings!
Wow look at the flutter in the tailpane at 2:14! Nice to see progress though.
Are you talking about the rudder? That's normal as it's connected to the NWS. Or the whole tail section? The flex you see is normal as well.
@@Andy-dc7hr I was talking about the horizontal stabilizer. Yeah thought that it's probably normal, just wanted to point it out. :) What's NWS though?
zhi hao quek nose wheel steering
@@cobiegaming oh ok thanks!
@@Andy-dc7hr I don't believe the nose wheel steering is connected to the rudder.
It sure looked like a rejected takeoff maneuver, but I think it is “high speed taxi test” if I’m not mistaken
I agree. I think they weren't suppose to high power the engines until GE get them the new fixed ones.
@David Pappas You are correct ...
You are correct this is just a high speed taxi test. People just like to make shit up to bash boeing even more lol
The RTO as shown in the video is among the last test points to be performed before first flight.
Very quiet take off
And... *HOT* brakes.
They'll need the BRK fan
the 777x Is going to be a good aircraft
ok
Nah, its AIRBUS
No it is not airbus is boeing
Knight Forbes Nah, it’s Boeing.
@@simple.stuffs Boeing
Legend has it the b777 is still waiting to takeoff
GE-9Xs are massive! Awesome plane *
Captain: wtf!! I forgot to board the passengers!! 2:32
Nice aircraft.
OMG THAT NEW B779
Wow, just look at how many speed-break Babel’s there are!
You just see the winglets slowly go down... What are the singlet controls?
You mean winglet controls? I believe they automatically fold up under 50 knots and down over 50 kts ground speed.
cant they just pull up alreadyyyyy
The RTO shown in the video is among the last tests to be performed on the runway before First Flight.
The raised winglets remind me of the top portion of the 737 Max 8 winglets.
You just had to be that guy.
sure smoked those brakes
Marc Newman better than burning to death.
Yeah, sure did. Part of a test I think.
I’ll take one of these as a BBJ thanks.
When will this take off is the question and with good safety standards in mind
That was cool
Gulf air is having a retro livery 0:19 😍
The plane doesn't have winglets, these are part of the wing and only swing up so the plane will use less space when parked.
I'm an Airbus fan (apart from the 747) but I honestly think it's a shame about Boeing's situation becuase both times it's the engine manufacturers problem. Had the cfm leap 1b been lighter. The Trent 1000s not been rushed being developed and the ge9x had been engineered properly they might actually be ok (the 737 max crisis is the engines problem becuase the weight of them caused the mcas application)
The engines weren't actually that big of a problem for the 737 MAX. The 737 MAXs woes are due to faulty software code in the MCAS system and MCAS exists because of type rating issues between the 737 NG & 737 MAX. The KC-46 also has MCAS but it's had no issues because that MCAS was well-coded.
Quite right Harry. Those Safran Leap engines mounted foreward of the wing necessitated the installation of MCAS because they are too heavy and knocked out the aircrafts C of G. Why GE didnt engine the Max no one knows, probably because they couldnt supply the number of engines required or they lost the contract. You cant put powerful turbo fans on an old airframe with a short undercarriage. Engineers at Boeing must have known this. Itll be a long long time before the Max flys in its present configuration.
@@johnnyboythepilot4098 yes I know but there wouldn't be the need for the instalation mcas had the engines had been lighter
@@tonyjennings1025 certainly. I think in the effort to make the MAX have a capacity comparable to a widebody with 4 classes they pushed the core airframe of the 737 beyond it's limits the 737 was not set out to have upwards of 150 seats installed ,and in my opinion, they're starting to defeat the point of having a low capacity airliner I think had they'd stuck with what the 737 was meant to be and not over dk e the capacity they would've been better off.
@@haz525 Iam a retired airline employee. In the late 60's we took delivery of the 200 series of the 737. Right from the start it was a winner for us, plenty of payload and fast. But the Pratt & Whitney engines were noisy hush kitsch were the answer. Today Airbus got the jump on Boeing with the A320neo, you cannot modify an old airframe then rush it into service. Iam an old guy for years I flew all over the world, today because of the colossal loss of 346 souls Iam deeply saddened because the Max was not safe, and it wont be until some fundamental changes are made. For instance, has the MCAS software been modified. I dont know, this tragic disaster for Boeing will go on well into next year, I hope Iam wrong but I cant see a fix at this time.
Hot brake check after that one!
LOOK AT THAT WINGLETS
This was actually a break/runway test
É um teste?
It's more of a test on the flight instruments from what it seems tbh. Spoilers deployed and all that
No shit
I love Paine Field...its very unique, if you look in the background at 2:39 you'll see a P-51 Mustang taxiing. How often can a heavy experimental and a WWII warbird be caught in the same shot...
777 has winglet now ?
Y did they not use the reversers?
reject takeoff test ?
No reverse thrust?
MCAS?
I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE THAT PLANE GO INTO THE AIR!!!
That was a high-speed test
I hope it makes a roar sound like ge90 engines
You forgot the X in the title ?
Man,I could live in 1 of those huge GE engines.the other side engine will be my garage.lol.✈✈✈✈
what is the bit that goes down at 2:02 and comes back up shortly after ?
I guess you mean the wingtips.Because of the 777X massive wingspan,they can retract the wingtips so the aircraft has the wingspan of a regular 777 and it eases taxying and saves parking space
Alex Wirz no I mean specifically at that time point in the middle of the wing . It comes down as a flap would but it’s not a flap I think
Its called an inboard aileron
Lion OfJudah or a flaperon
Boeing 777 MAX ?
Doesn't looked like RTO Test, accelerated too fast for it to be at MTOW, started braking too soon for it to be at MTOW and V1
Those winglets are sneaky. I'm confused.
The plane doesn't have winglets, these are part of the wing and only swing up so the plane will use less space when parked.
@@camilmoujaber4813 I was being humorous.
@@guitarsarelikestupid7200 oh
Don’t you think that chevrons make every plane look better?
😁👍
The smoke from the tires from the brakes are incredible!
Meanwhile:
Uuummm, Captain?
*I... I forgot my license... It's... It's still on the desk at home...*
*WHAT!??*
#ANA pilot, December 2019
Hi! Boeing 777x, how are you doing now?
Boeing 777X, Hi ana airlines pilot/777x, i’m american airlines
Wow. That was fascinating and so illustrative of ........
Inaudible soundtrack really added a certain je ne said quoi !
Its got abs...so is the smoke from the tires or the brakes?
Brakes they get hot.
Brakes only, no reverse thrust used.
That big, beautiful bird wants to take off soooooo bad.
Woah an empty plane can really take off (from a standing start).
That adjusted sharklets tho..
Great video! Not to be a dick, but why are the black borders surrounding the video included in the upload? My phone won't let me fit it to screen like other UA-cam videos because of this.
I read that Boeing have placed the 777-800 programme on hold. I really hope they instead develope the 777-1000 instead.
Not a rejected takeoff seeing as the first flight isn't until 2020 and the RTO tests won't come until well after that. Also, if they were planning to take off they would have put flaps down, which they didn't. The description makes good on this, and it's a 777X so I'm good with it. Nice video too!
It was, in fact, a rejected takeoff test.
@@danielh1708 You know, now that I think about it, that makes sense. Looks like I was wrong.
@@michaelrodeback1956 No worries, not a big deal.
Does this one come down?
This question makes no sense. What do you mean?
When you remember that you didn't file your flight plan
Its not rejected it might me a rejected takeoff test
Yeah it's like a test run
Thank you 4 that coz thats wat l observed too
All that was is a test to see how fast airspeed is achieved and slow down
You just don't take a plane and yank it off the ground first flight
Of course its a test.
Not an Emirates aeroplane to be seen anywhere
That's because it's in the assemble line
The Emirates a/c mentioned is the unpainted light gray tail you can see above the cockpit at 0:47
@@pfink70 There is a very prominent tail fin of a Gulf Air 777-300ER.
Emirates boss said that Emirates won't be taking orders from Boeing Airbus etc...until they give Emirates what they promise...reliable aircraft that Boeing Airbus etc... promise
@@pfink70 I do believe you but how do you know that it is an Emirates plane?
Thing is gorgeous
For the first time, I feel bad for Boeing.
Are tou sure this is not a brakes test xd
Video starts at 2:15
They just want to make spoiler test ??
I do hope them extended wingtips don’t start retracting during flight
Boeing has had plenty of experience with folding wings.
@@justanotheraviator2357 On military aircraft, maybe, but not in commercial aircraft. Hence the need for special condition's FAA request specific to this aircraft.
@@danielh1708 yes, however I was just saying Boeing has experience building folding wing mechanisms in general.
Woww nice one, excellent shot..
What was that? A Break Test or some Problems?
It was a test...probably for brakes and to see how fast the aircraft gains airspeed before they try and actually fly it
what's up?
It's a test not a rejected takeoff
I came just for ge9x
Shyte I left the oven on!
D E N I E D
Its not a rejected takeoff its a rejected takeoff brake test or rejected takeoff test
Se o A380 com esses duplos motores, e já era esse BOEING.
No flaps?
Sherman Couch I think probably flaps 1 or 5 otherwise the computer will be shouting at the pilot that the plane is not in take off configuration..... unless that can be overridden
@ Sherman Couch
this is step one of a row of tests that approximate MTOW and V1 conditions - in case of problems, they do not want to destroy the plane, after all.
Fly 777x, FLY! Hahahahahahahahaha
機長が財布忘れてきたとか、おもろいコメあって草
Almost
For a rejected take off why dont they use reverse thrust?
Azizuddin Ali Mir they probably started that when they aborted the take off
Its a brake test