UK soldiers had better go on a diet as the belt is suppose to carry their weight if they have been wounded, another soldier grabs the belt and carries them to safety.
Came looking for this comment. South African army still uses this type of belt. Fun fact, the belt is supposed to be strong so you have something to grab and pull your buddy to safety if they get shot, Uk belt is an absolute fail in that regard.
I like how the modern America belt is likely strong enough for conceivable uses but then breaks away without breaking the buckle. It seems like a pretty good design even though the buckle is plastic. The old Russian and America ones were pretty good because bending the clip restored them to full operation.
The buckle is designed to release at approximately 10g shock with a 40# load (1.78-2KN) to reduce injuries and entanglements and designed to be able to be quickly released under load with one hand.
The newer USA LBE belt quick release buckle is designed to release without breaking between 1.78 and 2 kilonewtons (10g shock at 40-45#) to reduce injuries and entanglement. Parachute buckles and adjusters are not designed to release or slip under load. When I was a paratrooper, we did not jump with the belt buckled, but would unbuckle the belt, loosen the shoulder straps, fold the ends in and pull the two sides through the diagonal back-straps of the parachute harness. When we rappelled, we used a harness or Swiss Seat but kept the belt buckled.
@@Penny-mk7fv A 'rigger belt' should not come loose or break because it is a life safety device. Load bearing equipment is intended to be quickly donned and doffed, with the preference that the gear be lost rather than a deadly entanglement or drowning.
Mondjuk, egy vadiúj és egy használt (valószínűleg már leselejtezett öv összehasonlításának eredménye kb. nulla relevanciával bír. Egyébként pedig, ez a kétfogas csat a peremezetlen lyukú vászon övvel, nem éppen egy zseniális innováció. Egy-két hónap aktív használat közben az a két fog olyan szépen szét fogja rojtolni a lyukakat, hogy az az öv lóf@szt sem fog tartani. Nem véletlen, hogy a buggyant ruszkikon kívül senki sem használ olyan vászon övet, ahol a csat csatlakozó részei érintkeznek a vászonnal. Persze, ezt a problémát kiküszöbölhetnék a ruszkik egy belső velcro réteg használatával, de az már valószínűleg túl drága lenne nekik. 🤷
Amazingly made by Stalinium! With a simple design, the holder is small but able to withstand very heavy loads. With just a little damage, even old designs can still be repaired
Exactly. The old American one was the same way. Just bend the clip back into place and it is fully restored. We have gotten too far away from this type of simple yet robust engineering on so many things.
5:04 это не настоящий солдатский ремень. Это подделка. Солдатским ремнем можно буксировать автомобиль. А солдатской стальной каской СССР мы поднимали под гусеницу одну сторону танка т-55😅
The 1940 US belt is actually a UK 1944 pattern belt, initially issued for jungle warfare, then onward after the war until 1958 until the pattern changed, great channel, captivating, great UA-cam thanks
It’s not 1944 pattern. The ‘44 pattern belt was made up of three pieces, a left and right hand front part with the two halves of the buckle, and a back piece. This might be Canadian ‘51 pattern.
That new Russian belt could be easily used as improvised rigger belt. I use belt that was meant to hold fully grown bull in place. I think it has around 3 tonnes breaking point. Not useful as trousers belt, but darn awesome for gear carry.
Солдаты срочной службы с помощью этих ремней таскают ящики, тяжёлые предметы за которые трудно ухватиться руками, некоторые даже умудряются этими ремнями двигатели из техники вытаскивать. Блин, я тебе военную тайну раскрыл. Меня расстреляют.😂
@@user-zp4iz8sw4e есть вечные произведения, типа "Броненосца Потёмкин", выполненные гениями, а есть проходное: это творчество Масленикова. Или вы можете назвать какой-нибудь его фильм, который стоит отметить? Поэтому да. Советский Шерлок Холмс - занудщина, посредственная и проходная. Пожалуй, из всего спустя годы останется только музыка Дашкевича и голос Ливанова. Остальное не стоит того, чтобы сохраниться во времени.
Horses for courses - there are times you don't want a belt to break (when you need it to work as a belt in most circumstances) and there are times you want the belt to break (entanglement) rather than let the belt break you. A compromise has to be reached, and each country has their own tolerance to risk, different risk appetite and mindset for dealing with people. I personally want a belt to be a belt and not to kill people, not to be the strongest item on the planet and lift huge weights that are reserved for cranes and chains, but other perople may want that capability, just in case they need it. When you are in a jam, you don't want your belt to hold you back, get caught on something that ensnares you and cut you in half. It is a belt, if it breaks you get another one or improvise with something until you get a new one. If a belt breaks, you can still carry on. The great thing about the British Forces is the ability to constantly improvise when things go wrong (and they always do go wrong in war). There is no such thing as fail-safe, 100% guaranteed or full reliability on everything. There are only three things the British Forces rely upon, themselves, their buddies and their ability to complete their mission, everything else is really inconsequential. It is a mindset issue - don't delude people thinking they have 'super human' equipment, they invariably have to rely on themselves and their initiative a lot of the time. Not everything is fastened properly in life - just accept it and move on. Russia may have the strongest belts in the world, but when it comes to warfare, we are seeing in real-time how quickly they buckle. When you are measuring belts instead of bravery, you are measuring the wrong thing.
Old russian and american belts - very sturdy and if it breaks, just use some basic tools to fix it and make it like new. New russian belt - can be used to tow trucks stuck in the mud. British belt - will break if the soldier tries to hang more than 2 teabags on it.
The Austrian belt is a stylish copy of the Canadian 1964 Pattern and 1990s Garrison Dress buckle. I suspect the Canadian Velcro would have slid as fast as back bacon in a hot frying pan.
The so called " USA 1940 " belt is actually a 1944 Pattern British Army belt and not latched properly. This 44 Pattern webbing was issued to British Army late 1944-45 to troops in the CBI theatre, included revised aluminium water bottle similar to USGI and also a holster for the Browning HP 9mm pistol which saw eervice among the Paras in 1945 .
I used a 58 pattern webbing belt that I required from my dad's reserve kit. Did me for my 8yr service from 1998 to 2006 and a roll pin belt on my PLCE webbing.
5:25 The “1940 USA” belt isn’t from the United States or is it from 1940, It’s a P58 British belt, you can tell from the buckle and the 2 buckles at the back.
Your so called US belt @5.30 is actually a Dutch M53 pattern belt used from 1953 untill 1993, that one is probably from the '70's as it still has Brass fittings. Later ones would have anodised Ally.
In the UK we use a belt similar to the 1940 american belt. Some people use plastic buckled ones but the majority wear something similar to the 1940 american belt
This is interesting. I understand why the buckle would need to be able to be able to bear loads up to a certain point but then break afterward. If you made an indestructible buckle with a strong ass fabric, and the soldier's belt was caught on something, that's life threatening potentially. You'd want it to break away to save your life and a belt is designed to secure your clothes/uniform and hold things. It is interesting to see which buckle breaks first though. I'd like to see a video of the fabric strength tested as well.
I would pick US or CN, because it can hold my weight with all I can carry and have reserve, yet brake before my spine does would it catch (or anything I have on it catch) say on passing vehicle. I would definitely avoid both extremes (RU and GB).
The 1940’s usa belt is actually a dutch belt used by the army from i think the late forties to about 1990. It looks a lot like the US belt because it was based on the same design. And you used it wrong, i am amazed at how much it still holds
Was not a 1940s U.S. belt because it would have been a m1936 pistol belt that should be dated somewhere in the 40s. You could have at least gotten a m1956 they are relatively the same belt and are easier to get.
По нашим стандартам замок защёлка на страховочных поясах не должен открываться при минимальной нагрузке 200 кг -это тот что защелкивается, тот что с с двумя шпильками как на офицерском замке минимально 700кг,а сама лента -пояс рвется при нагрузке не менее 1тонны и то в месте соединения в основном рвутся нитки которыми прострочена лента одна половинка к другой где петля для замка.
but you are putting the kilos on a second-generation lever arm, which multiplies the force, the belts are being subjected to greater stresses than those indicated by the press
US 1940s belt is deafinatly a post wwii brit belt. Had it been correctly fastened it would done much better. The new RUSSIAN belt would have done better if the buckle end was sewn instead of riveted. The belt im most impressed with is the Austrian battle belt. I thought the buckle was going to fail much earlyer
This belt seems to be multi purposed - to get an engine out of the vehicle in certain conditions, or to evacuate/get back on the track light infantry vehicle with 4 of these, for example.
We in the UK must have got the Aliexpress version
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Are you sure? The AliExpress Chinese army special outperformed the British belt.
UK soldiers had better go on a diet as the belt is suppose to carry their weight if they have been wounded, another soldier grabs the belt and carries them to safety.
😂🤣😂🤣😂
🇬🇧 _ 38kg ...👎
😂😂😂😂😂😂
The 1940's usa belt was not fastened properly
Exactly! I think that it’s gonna hold a lot more weight if it’s fastened properly!
Also wasn't a 1940s American... It was a late 60s early 70s Australian or South African
We had olso the same here in Greece at 70s, my father has one 🙂
Came looking for this comment. South African army still uses this type of belt. Fun fact, the belt is supposed to be strong so you have something to grab and pull your buddy to safety if they get shot, Uk belt is an absolute fail in that regard.
I had the USA 1940 belt issued in the 80ties in the Dutch Army
On UK belt package:
DO NOT FART WHILE WEARING!
It was pretty old, though. Some plastics age.
In soviet Russia , belt breaks you
Что??
@@prisma3d-gg9ok в советской россии тебя порвет ремень. Instead of the other way around ahaha
@@prisma3d-gg9okИн совьет Раша бэлт брекс ю
В советском союзе ремень порвёт тебя
Near 900 kg to brake it loool You can use it to tow T-90M and Terminator tanks
I like how the modern America belt is likely strong enough for conceivable uses but then breaks away without breaking the buckle. It seems like a pretty good design even though the buckle is plastic. The old Russian and America ones were pretty good because bending the clip restored them to full operation.
The buckle is designed to release at approximately 10g shock with a 40# load (1.78-2KN) to reduce injuries and entanglements and designed to be able to be quickly released under load with one hand.
If that's the goal, that Chinese Velcro held 142kg, leaving the buckle undamaged.
@@georgedang449Paraphrasing Lwis Carroll, A broken clock is right twice a day. They got it right by accident.
The newer USA LBE belt quick release buckle is designed to release without breaking between 1.78 and 2 kilonewtons (10g shock at 40-45#) to reduce injuries and entanglement. Parachute buckles and adjusters are not designed to release or slip under load.
When I was a paratrooper, we did not jump with the belt buckled, but would unbuckle the belt, loosen the shoulder straps, fold the ends in and pull the two sides through the diagonal back-straps of the parachute harness. When we rappelled, we used a harness or Swiss Seat but kept the belt buckled.
I was wondering about that, you do want it to break before it rips you in two :)
@@Penny-mk7fv A 'rigger belt' should not come loose or break because it is a life safety device. Load bearing equipment is intended to be quickly donned and doffed, with the preference that the gear be lost rather than a deadly entanglement or drowning.
Thank you for this clarification 👍
The 1940's American buckle was NOT properly closed up.
Was also not American maybe South African or Australian. US is similar but a weirder closer best way to describe is shaped like a horse hoof
South African one would have held double if it was properly fastened😊
@@dustyak79it British or Dutch
cope
44 Pattern British Army
Пояс Советской Армии ещё использовался как оружие рукопашного боя.
И он лучше современного. И более красивый. Новый пока в туалете расстегнёшь - обосрешься))
@@user-qd5bp4yf4v ты носил его лично? Он расстегивется в течении 2 секунд, а ты видимо до сих пор кросовки на липучках носишь
@@user-uc9dd8mc6wя круглый год ношу сандали на липучке и что?
@@user-qd5bp4yf4vэм, у тебя проблемы с растегиванием обычного ремня? Ну если это так, то у тебя явно проблемы с развитием
Пряжка не начищена и не согнута. Выдержал бы больше 😊
Russia 841 kg! Great Brittain 38 kg 🤣
Gayest belt to date.
In soviet Russia, belt brakes press
🤣@@1badombre82
Mondjuk, egy vadiúj és egy használt (valószínűleg már leselejtezett öv összehasonlításának eredménye kb. nulla relevanciával bír. Egyébként pedig, ez a kétfogas csat a peremezetlen lyukú vászon övvel, nem éppen egy zseniális innováció. Egy-két hónap aktív használat közben az a két fog olyan szépen szét fogja rojtolni a lyukakat, hogy az az öv lóf@szt sem fog tartani. Nem véletlen, hogy a buggyant ruszkikon kívül senki sem használ olyan vászon övet, ahol a csat csatlakozó részei érintkeznek a vászonnal. Persze, ezt a problémát kiküszöbölhetnék a ruszkik egy belső velcro réteg használatával, de az már valószínűleg túl drága lenne nekik. 🤷
340 кг
Amazingly made by Stalinium! With a simple design, the holder is small but able to withstand very heavy loads. With just a little damage, even old designs can still be repaired
Exactly. The old American one was the same way. Just bend the clip back into place and it is fully restored. We have gotten too far away from this type of simple yet robust engineering on so many things.
@@jkeelsnc as like the modern day car
5:04 это не настоящий солдатский ремень. Это подделка. Солдатским ремнем можно буксировать автомобиль. А солдатской стальной каской СССР мы поднимали под гусеницу одну сторону танка т-55😅
the belt of the 40th year was connected incorrectly, let's do it again
The 1940 US belt is actually a UK 1944 pattern belt, initially issued for jungle warfare, then onward after the war until 1958 until the pattern changed, great channel, captivating, great UA-cam thanks
And it was fastened incorrectly. The UK belt was very worn out and the buckle is the same as the USA. Still a great video.
It’s not 1944 pattern. The ‘44 pattern belt was made up of three pieces, a left and right hand front part with the two halves of the buckle, and a back piece. This might be Canadian ‘51 pattern.
Nah, Canadian '51 had eyelets on the top and bottom, it's a Dutch M52 belt. @@mrcharles1602
I think if it had been connected properly it would faired fare better.
Good to see the UK upholding tradition. 👍
That new Russian belt could be easily used as improvised rigger belt. I use belt that was meant to hold fully grown bull in place. I think it has around 3 tonnes breaking point. Not useful as trousers belt, but darn awesome for gear carry.
Солдаты срочной службы с помощью этих ремней таскают ящики, тяжёлые предметы за которые трудно ухватиться руками, некоторые даже умудряются этими ремнями двигатели из техники вытаскивать.
Блин, я тебе военную тайну раскрыл. Меня расстреляют.😂
@@Avngcnjhnjh245 Всю дорогу квадратное катаем, круглое носим и в этом нам помогают "ремни".
Вы правы, он очень хорошо помогает контролировать хищных животных, особенно американских булли, питбулей, догов.
It holds fully grown bullshit, yeah
Подтверждаю что солдаты срочной службы в РФ таскают тяжести именно с помощью этих ремней❤
За тему из Холмса отдельное спасибо! Смешно. Думаю, англичане не поймут.
Естественно, музыка-то советская
Они Ливанова в рыцари посветили, так что...может кто-то и смотрел. Сегодня это уже занудщина и много других Шерлоков повыходило.
По Австрии "Мы будем бухать всю неделю" тоже весёленько получилось.
@@denisalexandrov4354занудщина с Ливановым..... ну вы икспэрд
@@user-zp4iz8sw4e есть вечные произведения, типа "Броненосца Потёмкин", выполненные гениями, а есть проходное: это творчество Масленикова. Или вы можете назвать какой-нибудь его фильм, который стоит отметить?
Поэтому да. Советский Шерлок Холмс - занудщина, посредственная и проходная. Пожалуй, из всего спустя годы останется только музыка Дашкевича и голос Ливанова. Остальное не стоит того, чтобы сохраниться во времени.
To the British soldiers watching this, you should be proud to defend your country!
🤣
British ALWAYS had worst equipment.
@@uroskostic8570 You misspelled government.
most use roller lock buckles not those
@@edthebumblingfoolI don’t know anyone that used PLCE with the issued buckles
Horses for courses - there are times you don't want a belt to break (when you need it to work as a belt in most circumstances) and there are times you want the belt to break (entanglement) rather than let the belt break you. A compromise has to be reached, and each country has their own tolerance to risk, different risk appetite and mindset for dealing with people. I personally want a belt to be a belt and not to kill people, not to be the strongest item on the planet and lift huge weights that are reserved for cranes and chains, but other perople may want that capability, just in case they need it. When you are in a jam, you don't want your belt to hold you back, get caught on something that ensnares you and cut you in half. It is a belt, if it breaks you get another one or improvise with something until you get a new one. If a belt breaks, you can still carry on. The great thing about the British Forces is the ability to constantly improvise when things go wrong (and they always do go wrong in war). There is no such thing as fail-safe, 100% guaranteed or full reliability on everything. There are only three things the British Forces rely upon, themselves, their buddies and their ability to complete their mission, everything else is really inconsequential. It is a mindset issue - don't delude people thinking they have 'super human' equipment, they invariably have to rely on themselves and their initiative a lot of the time. Not everything is fastened properly in life - just accept it and move on. Russia may have the strongest belts in the world, but when it comes to warfare, we are seeing in real-time how quickly they buckle. When you are measuring belts instead of bravery, you are measuring the wrong thing.
You didn't have the 1940 USA buckled correctly.
don't cry
Old russian and american belts - very sturdy and if it breaks, just use some basic tools to fix it and make it like new.
New russian belt - can be used to tow trucks stuck in the mud.
British belt - will break if the soldier tries to hang more than 2 teabags on it.
Great channel
Nice 👍
38 KG😅
The Austrian belt is a stylish copy of the Canadian 1964 Pattern and 1990s Garrison Dress buckle. I suspect the Canadian Velcro would have slid as fast as back bacon in a hot frying pan.
US 40 belt is actually a UK pat 58
In fact a post WW2 Dutch army webbing belt.
The so called " USA 1940 " belt is actually a 1944 Pattern British Army belt and not latched properly. This 44 Pattern webbing was issued to British Army late 1944-45 to troops in the CBI theatre, included revised aluminium water bottle similar to USGI and also a holster for the Browning HP 9mm pistol which saw eervice among the Paras in 1945 .
The american 1940's belt you closed the wrong way. Look at your own vid (5:25) how to close it properly. I think it will test even much better
It’s a belt buckle u wear for equipment. If it gets caught on something do I want my body to separate into 2 pieces or the buckle?
nah, legs are overrated anyways
I used a 58 pattern webbing belt that I required from my dad's reserve kit. Did me for my 8yr service from 1998 to 2006 and a roll pin belt on my PLCE webbing.
I used an East German web belt to pull a side by side out of deep sand . Thank you Erik Hoeneker and friends .
Dammit Great Britain ! You are my brother and I expect more from you !
Where do you get that chinese one?
Помню как иголкой стирали зеленую краску с бляхи, и полировали пастогоем до блеска. Особенно когда делать нехрен😂
Very cool.
The old Russian belt looks so simple to make, compared to all the riveted modern belts. But the result is still pretty good and completely adequate.
therefor you normally carry a spare buckle an clips with you (learned the hard way in the middle of nowhere) in Austria 😁
There is an earlier version of the UK belt that has a very similar brass buckle to the 1940's US belt that you need to try.
5:25 The “1940 USA” belt isn’t from the United States or is it from 1940, It’s a P58 British belt, you can tell from the buckle and the 2 buckles at the back.
The land of VERY HEAVY pants!🎉🎉
I learn how turn a press into a expander thanks.
I wonder how an automotive seat belt buckle would have compared?
This will be interesting.
Very nice
Thks
Nice Gasper
Your so called US belt @5.30 is actually a Dutch M53 pattern belt used from 1953 untill 1993, that one is probably from the '70's as it still has Brass fittings. Later ones would have anodised Ally.
Ally or alloy? Im confused sorry 😭
In the UK we use a belt similar to the 1940 american belt. Some people use plastic buckled ones but the majority wear something similar to the 1940 american belt
Its shame you don't test Polish army belts old and new. This will be interesting
thanks
“WW2”
Fortunate son playing in the background
You should test French Belt Famas first génération 😉
軍用の耐久性テストは大事です!特に開閉動作点検、外観点検等確認ですね😉
Здравствуйте. Вам тоже понравился Британский ремень?🤭🤭🤭
also i would say it depents on how old the belts were ,spezialy the plastic clips usualy become brittle over time
The US 1940 belt is actually a Netherlands Army M 52 belt, that was closed improperly. The UK 1944 and 1958 pattern belts are distinctly different.
This is interesting. I understand why the buckle would need to be able to be able to bear loads up to a certain point but then break afterward. If you made an indestructible buckle with a strong ass fabric, and the soldier's belt was caught on something, that's life threatening potentially. You'd want it to break away to save your life and a belt is designed to secure your clothes/uniform and hold things. It is interesting to see which buckle breaks first though. I'd like to see a video of the fabric strength tested as well.
Lol
🤡🤡🤡🤡
@TheMaret333 sorry you didn't like the comment. I hope you find peace in your heart. JK
a’Belt time we learned
Would of been cool to see a modern US belt with the Cobra buckle
That ratnik belt be holding good...
Much stronger than I thought.
That block of wood has done really well though …..
What is this song call in Astria part ?
It’s actually a Dutch song. Can’t remember the name. Maybe "Zeven Dagen Lang". 😊
yes its zeven tage lang
@@Clive_Omni
The UK use a belt similar to the USA old one without holes in it
I used a 58 pattern webbing belt that I required from my dad's reserve kit. Did me for my 8yr service! and a roll pin belt on my webbing.
Even though it wasn’t fastened right it still held that’s a win in my book still
Show!!
I would pick US or CN, because it can hold my weight with all I can carry and have reserve, yet brake before my spine does would it catch (or anything I have on it catch) say on passing vehicle. I would definitely avoid both extremes (RU and GB).
1:19 music from russian sherlock holms )))
The 1940’s usa belt is actually a dutch belt used by the army from i think the late forties to about 1990. It looks a lot like the US belt because it was based on the same design. And you used it wrong, i am amazed at how much it still holds
Was not a 1940s U.S. belt because it would have been a m1936 pistol belt that should be dated somewhere in the 40s. You could have at least gotten a m1956 they are relatively the same belt and are easier to get.
143 kg, é o peso de 2 chineses armados
С подсумками полными американскими скальпами
So I guess this lets us know which belts to use as cargo lifting straps. They are all more than strong enough to do what they were meant for.
По нашим стандартам замок защёлка на страховочных поясах не должен открываться при минимальной нагрузке 200 кг -это тот что защелкивается, тот что с с двумя шпильками как на офицерском замке минимально 700кг,а сама лента -пояс рвется при нагрузке не менее 1тонны и то в месте соединения в основном рвутся нитки которыми прострочена лента одна половинка к другой где петля для замка.
but you are putting the kilos on a second-generation lever arm, which multiplies the force, the belts are being subjected to greater stresses than those indicated by the press
US 1940s belt is deafinatly a post wwii brit belt. Had it been correctly fastened it would done much better. The new RUSSIAN belt would have done better if the buckle end was sewn instead of riveted. The belt im most impressed with is the Austrian battle belt. I thought the buckle was going to fail much earlyer
La ceinture américaine des années 1940 n’était pas attachée correctement
Not really of any significance but I found it very interesting.
WW2 belt outperformed most of the modern ones and was only half fastened.
They probably all met their respective specifications (and cost 180 times the commercial model)
Try the ALICE belt post Viet Nam.
1940s USA battle belt was not fastened correctly.
So basically Russian belt for battle and towing your neighbors car. Austian belt for battle and style bonus
You need to redo a 1940s usa type bcs it wasnt coupled as it ahould have been
That new russian belt is the best..🤔🇷🇺👍841kg is very good..
If the guy weighs that much then you’ll need a vehicle to drag him.
@@boggisthecatu can carry fab500 using that belts. GGs😌
The 1940's USA belt could have taken a bit more if connected correctly.
British Army kit living up to expectation as usual ….
the vintage American you locked up wrong way
سبحان الله وبحمده سبحان الله العظيم
You dont have tested the French belt named "ceinturon FAMAS F2"
For me its the best, with this belt you can also open beer bottles
Nie ma pasa US 1940,to brytyjski pattern 58!
Turkish or Ottoman products could also be tested
The belt is a part of uniform which have to perform it's functions. What is a weight of Russian ammunition suspended on a belt?
This belt seems to be multi purposed - to get an engine out of the vehicle in certain conditions, or to evacuate/get back on the track light infantry vehicle with 4 of these, for example.
7:48 new russian belt, the hydraulic press broke at 841 KG 😅
The UK one isn't issued anymore the one shown is from the 90s
The "1940s USA" one was not a USA one. US Military had a different fastener. Speaking of which, it was not fastened right when tested.
The 1940s belt is a British P44 oattern, is ntot from the US, and the buckle was fastened wrong.
Nice but try french army belt F1 !!!
The hell is Russia doing, putting their entire sock budget into designing better belts?
Što mi krivo kad ljudi unište dobar komad opreme ili oružja,da bi pokazao koliko je jak i kvalitetan.🤣👍
🍒 très intéressante vidéo
Dommage,il manquait la Française 😭
Freinch 😂😂
Russians in their own style. "This shit is heavy, durable, mended with a hammer,"
Redo the 1940's Belt Please, I want to see if it'll take more weight connected properly
That's what they mean by getting caught with your pants down.