Can Tiger Woods hit a golf ball through your head? ua-cam.com/video/yim8kIy0K94/v-deo.html We spent an entire year designing the absolute best EDC pocket knife that fits perfectly into your 5th pants pocket (that tiny pocket nobody uses). We’re temporarily giving our viewers 15% off + free shipping - checkout code “iwantfatpp”. If it says out of stock, we plan to make more late this month. Now you can finally join the FAT PP club with one snug in your pants! stabbylabs.com/collections/knives-tools Also… - Yup, lots of range litter.. Packed out with three full garbage bags of trash. Do your part and help keep these spots open - Matt pls collab w us. pls
Man, I absolutly do want a fat pp, but... There is one shipping rate available for Queensland, Australia. Rates start at $67.96 USD. Even with 4 knives in the cart (I got friends that will want one if they see me with one)
If I recall correctly, one of the issues with a heavy duty body plate they used to make for bullet proof vests, was that it ricocheted bullets upward into the wearers skull. Which isn't ideal...
Spalling. Its actually the opposite of deflection. The bullet hits the wall perfectly flat and actually shatters like glass. A lot goes away, but the top portion of the bullet has nowhere to explode but up. And thats usually your chin.
so why not add that cover that they used to do with medieval arrows, there was this v crest at the top to deflect arrow shards that exploded upon impact on an armor
Biggest issue seems to be that you can't predict where that shrapnel will fly once it deflects off your sloped armor. Your arms will probably be shredded. And if you're really unlucky, a piece might blind you. But it's definitely a helluva interesting concept.
Think about it tho. The plate has a high hardness and is angled pretty well. Also, those bullets have a pretty high chance of ricochet or shattering as they're spire point/spitzer. The curve from the middle section to the tip is very similar to the angle of the plate, so when the edge of the bullet hits the angled plate, it just kind of slides off. The bullet would probably have to have a lot of power to negate those dynamics. Could put a square shaped ballistic cap on it (like APBC tank rounds) so when it hits the plate it crumples and pulls the bullet into the angle of the plate. Over explanation done
Angled armour was excessively used during world war ii for example the Soviets T-34 it's angled armour was able to deflect rounds as big as a 75 millimetre due to it's mostly 60° angled frontal armour and mostly 40° angled side armour
@@dylanmcgill9544 bro t 34 armour wasnt THAT effective against flak 88. Round from any tank from pz4 to tiger 2 will easily penetrate t 34, let alone the a little more armoured version aka 85 which came in 1944, before it had smaller calibre gun like 76mm, 57. Pzgr 39 the shell that was used in pz4 and stug may penetrate 99mm 60° sloped armour, while t34 frontal armour plate was only 45mm
@@themagnuscraft1152 i guess i was just over exaggerating still tho with my pz4 experience in war thunder (which is probably inaccurate as hell) with the pz4 H i was having a hard time penetrating from the front but i don't have much problem with the side armour but sometimes it doesn't penetrate which i guess that's just skill issue
The anti material round is specifically designed for punching through metal. Military uses them for disarming mines and eods. Because they are really good for punching through metal. If you used a standard 50bmg I’m curious if it’d still punch through.
Plates looks about 5mm max, assuming it's angled 45° you get about 7mm of effective armor. Ball rounds can pen about 12 mm, I think it would go through(assuming it doesn't ricochet)
That was just lead. No tungsten penetrator, no mass-reactive space magic. Just a chunk of lead the size of your thumb moving really fast. Not special at all
My problem with this design is that the bullet might ricochet to another person close to them. Which can be hazardous if your give a whole squad of dudes these. But if I make some droids or killer robots with armor like this yeah that would be a lot more intimidating.
17th century armor is the closest to angled armor it gets, but even they weren't stupid enough to make it ricochet bullets (for the most part...) Because it might save your life but your buddy next to you will eat more than his daily dose of shrapnel...
no they didn't intentionally make it slope, but rather to fit for the wearer and their armor always ricochet projectiles of the muskets since their standards of making 16th century bullet proof armor is around 4mm to above thick and their armor is either made from wrought iron or forge steel.
@@REMASTEREDAGAIN not true, could've just made it round or flat like other previous armor designs that could fit a wearer just as well, and most armor at the time was thick and heavy as you said, by making it slope in the front they could reduce the thickness a little though, using less material was preferable for cheaper manufacturing cost and wearer's comfort
@@birisuandrei1551 Incorrect they didn't make flat armor excemption to the kastenbrust since it has slope front, most armor are round to make it fit well to the wearer also not the have other parts limited or obstruct their movement, and also their armor from early plated armor to 18th century armor is commonly seen as rounded or rounded pike-nose shaped. Overall rounded shape is generally slope already around 15 degrees or 20. Penetration of musket firearms are base on to kinetic energy making thinner and sloper armor more useless meaning their penetration is base on that energy unlike today's firearm based on the charge of the cartridge note they used weaker charge.
@@REMASTEREDAGAIN 14 and 15 century cuirasses were round to deflect spear blow (you can also track it in bascinet helmet with houndskull visor, that is conical) also great helmets had this central ridge and slopes to deflect spears too
They did experiment with angled body armour in World War 1. Look up Brewster Body Shield. It worked well to stop rifle bullets, but the armour overall was really cumbersome. Also, if too steeply angled, the bullet could ricochet into one of your buddies, so that's not something you would want.
And the point of angled armor is that it makes it harder to penetrate, while simultaneously reduce the material needed to reach specific deflection target. If you used to need a 90mm of steel to reach specific target, slope it 45 degrees and you will require only half of it (not exact math). Reduced armor => Reduced weight => Increased mobility
The benefit of angled armour isn't that it just increases the thickness for penetration but it also redirects the energy of the projectile. Similar to the way lighting will follow the path of least resistance, bullets still require "bite" before they can even begin to penetrate.
@@sneeringimperialist6667 Here is a novel idea, corrugated armor. Put a layer of ceramic tiles at the front to break up the projectile, a metal plate made of triangles in the middle, and Kevlar a the back to catch spalling.
That answers some questions I had. Trying to make a manga, with guns and all, I thought "bullet are like tank round, but to protect tank we angled the armor, why not do the same with body armor ?" And then begun designing my characters armor with angled armor. This video proves me that it works so thanks.
@@daz211 If you're been shot from the side or rear, angled armor or not it is pretty much the end for you Atleast it works when you're facing the baddies and the impact of the bullet would hurt less since you have space between your armor and your chest and also you're maybe not going to fall to the ground after the first shot since the bullet bounce so it doesn't transfer all his energy to you (this argument is totally hypothetical, I have absolutely no idea what I am saying and I hope you or someone else can correct me if I say sh*t)
I was thinking that wouldn't it be more comfortable to use em like thin, lightweigjt forward facing ballistic shields? I mean as shown in the vid the sloped armor despite being thin is effective. If used as body armor maybe make it like a 3 piece armor? 2 sloped left and right, and at the center/chest besides the sloped armor is a standard thick piece of flat metal, but then as much as possible the sloped areas are larger compared to the single-flat-armor.
@@Hurdlecurdle3321 you would not be able to move, even with a super cool exo skele, too much shit in the way itd be cool for a machine though! like a robot/mech or vehic- oh wait
The problem with this concept is that it depends entirely on your directional relationship to the line of fire. If your assailant moves 10 degrees away from directly in front of you, the results will be devastating.
Ooh, ooh, I know! No worries if UR targeted not straight-on. Put the chest gable on a ball-bearing mount, and pay Raytheon to add a miniature radar with servos to quickly rotate armour into direction of incoming!
well not exactly its in .416 which was more designed for long range ballistics rather than anti materiel properties and its kinda a weird pairing in a somewhat innacurate rifle but laws are laws and whatever
@@oranguman8606 yep, that’s if they filmed in California at least, the rest of the us with the exception of New York and other totalitarian states allow .50 cal like any other un neutered rifles lol
I honestly didn't expect a random video about a body armour to be THIS hilarious. I love when ppl aren't afraid of putting some really good jokes in their videos! Great vid!
I always used to wonder why we never saw stuff like “polygonal armor” in semi-contemporary science fiction. Armor being able to “guide” bullets away from making a solid impact would genuinely be the coolest shit ever.
should have made it composite tank armour, so you would need a 152mm uranium depleted dart that can pierce 2000mm of steel so youre safe from any threat you might encounter in downtown la
The "Brewster Body Shield" from WW1 essentially used this exact concept to make an experimental, relatively lightweight bulletproof suit of armour, so that the troops of the Entente Powers could cross no-man's land and beat the Bosch. Ultimately not adopted, considered too heavy and bulky to be practical.
The idea of angled armor is really cool. Hell I even saw a guy in a movie with that angled chest plate you use, but he had it covering his whole face with a narrow slit to see through. It looked weird, like he had a metal cheese head. But this is proof that his helmet would actually work. But feeling the Shockwaves from the bullets would probably be really bad on your body, still beats taking a bullet to the flesh of your face though.
If you were to make another one of these, my suggestion is to feature a piece of tool-hardened bar stock at the front intersection of the plates, weld both plates to it at the desired angle leaving space in the middle inside, then welding a second smaller piece of softer steel on the inside where the plates intersect. It creates a much larger surface area where the plates are connected and such a configuration would be capable of taking direct hits to the front of the armor. It's not that much more effort, or weight - but it would dramatically improve the structural integrity and durability of the armor.
That style of armor became popular in the 16th century when black powder guns and crossbows starting making appearance on the battlefields, breast plates, shields and even helms started being made with sharp angular plates like this in order to deflect these powerful weapons that could penetrate armor.
That's a really cool experiment, thanks! BTW why were certain segments blurred like welding, loading a magazine etc? Did YT update their stupid TOS again for gun videos?
Okay hear me out: FAT PP = Brilliant idea However i come to you with an additional concept. What if we combined it... with a refillable butane lighter? Or even a micro usb rechargeable electric arc lighter? Portable heat sources are always handy to have just like a tool like a knife. And at my work i get asked for both equally. So why not combine the two and save even more precious pocket space?
Especially in a survival situation having a knife and a heat source could be the difference between life and death Also fat PP is the best name for a product I’ve ever heard
@@azmitzy that’s why I mentioned a lighter I know somebody that would have died they got lost outside in the snow with 1 other person the other guy was a smoker my friend wasn’t They were both lost and the fact the smoker had a lighter saved both their lives if your asking what they burned because it’s snow they burned a Burger King receipt and like 120$ for warmth
the AR wasn't shooting low, the optic and bore have an offset at short distance. for example, if the parallel sight line of your optic is 3" above the bore of your barrel, at 15 yards you can expect your point of aim and point of impact to about 3" offset. there's more to it than that, but that's the gist of it.
Well guess that’s why many old fashioned armours were p rounded/slanted and/or pointy. Nowadays probably not the most convenient nor effective shape, but (imho) I think it would be pretty useful for shields. First time on the channel, very entertaining contents pal, thanks for sharing it
I think it is pretty amazing that .223 and .308 can be deflected by your 45 degree angle steel plate prototype. This is probably why some curiassier armor would deflect sword and lance points, and possibly musket balls. How ever, like the .50 cal anti-material round, Napoleonic Cavalry armor would not deflect cannon balls. What type of hardened steel did you use?
As cool of a video this is, wearing triangular body armor wouldn’t be a great idea for a multitude of reasons like mobility and ability to do certain things like lie down on your stomach. But other than that, a bullet being deflected to the left or right could cause fragmentation to hit your arms or hand or other body parts, depending on where they get deflected to
An interesting idea for sure, but it would sort of be negated if a person was not shooting at you directly from the front, if they shout at you from like 10 or 2 o clock it’s just a straight shot this way. And most combatants don’t stand facing directly forward, a rifle shooting stance is canted inward so it’s likely that the impact from someone in front of your line of sight would hit the armor straight on. Also hope you don’t value your arms much… or people near you- yeah maybe it’s safer for personal body armor to just absorb and not ricochet 😂 love the video though hilarious
What about a modern full plate armor full with curves and chambers? Sure, would be a nightmare to engineer and prolly one to put it in the first place but hey!
Probably effective for home defense since most of the robbers carry pistols. Rather than making a slanted armor, you can create a huge triangular shield that you can carry around which can cover your head and body when being shoot at.
I'd actually been thinking about a concept similar to this, though taller and more narrow. I'm interested in tanks and had the same thought on body armour's strike face, toying around with the idea of affixing a piece of steel to the front of a plate carrier. Light and angular, covering around 30-50% of the carrier, with the idea being that you create a shot trap that would deflect most of the energy of a bullet's impact off the center of the carrier. I appreciate the video, it shows that there's promise in the idea, just got to put it together and go through testing.
I think the most dangerous aspect of this kind of armour is the increased risk of ricochet hitting a team member. The reduced damage is a trade off between the amount of energy sapped from the projectile. Shame really because it make a huge difference to the integrity of the plates.
7:36 Love the design, I think the only thing missing for the Fat PP is a small hook slot cuz those tiny pockets are a pain to get anything out of them if they go too deep inside.....
one huge detractor from the sloped body armor is the "spalling, shrapnel, or bullet fragments"( pick the name you prefer). The armor you made is too wide for the wearer to use his arms and still his arms are getting ripped up. Make the armor narrow enough for good arm motion and every round would rip up the arm on the impact side disabling the wearer. Modern approved armor is designed to capture those tiny high velocity razor blades.
@@potatoman7594 ya, so then just make it like proper body armor, this design is a total failure, Hollywood would have you believe that bullet/fragmentation wounds to the arm are nothing to worry about,,, but there are a few arteries in the upper arm/shoulder region that can bleed you out in minutes.
It seems like a pretty decent idea as the military uses it for deflecting bullets away from their vehicles which isn't really a problem if they're ricocheting off around a bunch of other armored vehicles. If you have a group of people and they're all wearing this type of body armor and the bullets are being deflected off to the sides, not so much up or down, what does that mean for the rest of the troops around you? What would be really interesting is if you did a slow motion video showing semi automatic rapid fire at the V armor just to see where all the bullets would be flying and who would be getting taken out.
The reason its not used is because you need to Stop and CAPTURE the round not just deflect it.... Look at the spatter of the bullet as it breaks up upon impact..... its completely shredding the mannequins arms.
Okay, just saying, shooting high energy rounds like .50 BNG against metal targets is quite dangerous in the slim chance it ricochets someone could get hurt
The geometry is sound and works. The issue is bulk, protecting your arms, and as many have pointed out. The design is only effective with the V facing the shooter. If the shooter is at an angle to you, it defeats the deflection function of the V plate.
In fairness, the .50 BMG and similar rounds from the era were designed to beat light tank armor, which combines sloping with other fancy concepts so it's not too surprising it went through. Still very entertaining though, especially when the dummy slumped over at the perfect moment 😂
It wasnt 50 bmj. This barrett was chambered in 416 barrett which does not have any kind of penetrator core. Its a smaller and less powerful version because CA banned 50 cals.
Change the design then... Make it like a shield for your non dominant arm so when you are aiming with your gun, literally below the barrel you have this triangle/angled "shield" that cover both your arms and chest.... Probably a bit uncomfortable that way but we saw in the video it's effective
You probably know this, but main reason body armour absorbs instead of deflect, is it can be unpredictable and a deflected bullet would probably hit someone else
Yes and because spalling, in this, they used a very high quality and thin steel, but and only shot it probably 20 times, if over 60 hit, it would send fragments into the body, with kevlar this issue is almost non existent
You know, I have harbored that idea for a long ass time. Deployable cover by smacking down a little metal wall in front of you to have cover and a place to mount your weapon was a good concept, but what if it was just a sharply angled sheet of metal? Wouldn't bullets just ricochet off regardless of most ammunition types? Sure it needs to be kinda dense but it doesn't need to be ultra thick and whaddya know, here's a video for it! :D
Deflection angle is a problem for you - or more precisely the people to your left or right side. If you were using this as armour, your troops would need to keep a very wide long triangular route, so that the people beside you don't get hit by ricochets
1:50 swerved off and hit straight in the shoulder, congrats! You've dropped whatever you were using to protect yourself, and you're injured! And yeah Ik this is supposed dumb and stupid, that's why Iade this comment...
Can Tiger Woods hit a golf ball through your head? ua-cam.com/video/yim8kIy0K94/v-deo.html
We spent an entire year designing the absolute best EDC pocket knife that fits perfectly into your 5th pants pocket (that tiny pocket nobody uses). We’re temporarily giving our viewers 15% off + free shipping - checkout code “iwantfatpp”. If it says out of stock, we plan to make more late this month. Now you can finally join the FAT PP club with one snug in your pants! stabbylabs.com/collections/knives-tools
Also…
- Yup, lots of range litter.. Packed out with three full garbage bags of trash. Do your part and help keep these spots open
- Matt pls collab w us. pls
Man I thought you guys quit or something I was waiting for part two of the egg video but then you guys just disappeared...
Care to tell the story
Man, I absolutly do want a fat pp, but...
There is one shipping rate available for Queensland, Australia.
Rates start at $67.96 USD.
Even with 4 knives in the cart (I got friends that will want one if they see me with one)
why didint u guys post in like 8 monts???
Do you have lotion for sale
I have a stupid idea but you should attempt to make curved body armor
“Sloped armor is usually used on tanks, humvee turrets, and Lara Croft’s tits.”
Subscribed.
Based
That’s the exact moment I also subscribed
I think a similar designe was used in the renaissance against Muskets :
And made 4 ww1 but never used in war !
PS1 Tomb Raider baby, SHARP ANGLES :v
same
If I recall correctly, one of the issues with a heavy duty body plate they used to make for bullet proof vests, was that it ricocheted bullets upward into the wearers skull. Which isn't ideal...
Spalling. Its actually the opposite of deflection. The bullet hits the wall perfectly flat and actually shatters like glass. A lot goes away, but the top portion of the bullet has nowhere to explode but up. And thats usually your chin.
@@eon2330 yes that’s what it was thanks dude!
so why not add that cover that they used to do with medieval arrows, there was this v crest at the top to deflect arrow shards that exploded upon impact on an armor
@@BringDHouseDown limits neck and head movement? Idk
@@magma2680 Well ... dying also limits neck and head movement in the long run. 😆
Biggest issue seems to be that you can't predict where that shrapnel will fly once it deflects off your sloped armor. Your arms will probably be shredded. And if you're really unlucky, a piece might blind you. But it's definitely a helluva interesting concept.
Put a sidewall to catch the shrapnel.
triangle arm guards lol
That's what anti spalling coating is for
Yep or if it will hit the people around you
@@ieuanhunt552 anti spalling coating won't help because spalling isn't what's happening here. The whole round is being deflected. That isn't spalling
2:16 i love how the dummy just turns his head, just like "did i feel somthing?"
dummy was mewing while being shot
@@90lee2exactly what I thought of
he mogged us all
must have been the wind
@@keyztrokeHOLY SHIT IS THAT MINOS PRIME
Suspect: "I am invincible"
Cops: *Take three steps to the right flank
Suspect: "I would like to apologise"
Go ahead and think your invincible, unless u pack serious armor, you aint stopping 20mm 🤣
@@alexsandrkerensky7457 it's a joke
1:38
@@dineshjanapati6511 you can take whatever steps you like , if the cop packs a barrett with ap, api, or slap, your still not invicible 🤣
Some people are impossible to communicate with lol
Honestly I wasn't expecting a plate that thin to deflect rounds from a .223, let alone a .308, even at an angle like that.
Think about it tho. The plate has a high hardness and is angled pretty well. Also, those bullets have a pretty high chance of ricochet or shattering as they're spire point/spitzer. The curve from the middle section to the tip is very similar to the angle of the plate, so when the edge of the bullet hits the angled plate, it just kind of slides off. The bullet would probably have to have a lot of power to negate those dynamics. Could put a square shaped ballistic cap on it (like APBC tank rounds) so when it hits the plate it crumples and pulls the bullet into the angle of the plate. Over explanation done
Angled armour was excessively used during world war ii for example the Soviets T-34 it's angled armour was able to deflect rounds as big as a 75 millimetre due to it's mostly 60° angled frontal armour and mostly 40° angled side armour
@@dylanmcgill9544 bro t 34 armour wasnt THAT effective against flak 88. Round from any tank from pz4 to tiger 2 will easily penetrate t 34, let alone the a little more armoured version aka 85 which came in 1944, before it had smaller calibre gun like 76mm, 57. Pzgr 39 the shell that was used in pz4 and stug may penetrate 99mm 60° sloped armour, while t34 frontal armour plate was only 45mm
@@themagnuscraft1152 okay fair I'll change it to 75 mil
@@themagnuscraft1152 i guess i was just over exaggerating still tho with my pz4 experience in war thunder (which is probably inaccurate as hell) with the pz4 H i was having a hard time penetrating from the front but i don't have much problem with the side armour but sometimes it doesn't penetrate which i guess that's just skill issue
You don't need to buy new guns, just do a collaboration with Kentucky Ballistics or DemolitionRanch.
That'd be awesome! Plus Garand Thumb
@@RyanKung Every channel needs a big dose of Flannel Daddy.
@@RyanKung we need a Garand Thumb collab
@@RyanKung also Hickok45
@@cap5856 indubidably
I love how this guy skips the yapping stage and went straight to the point
tysm
The anti material round is specifically designed for punching through metal. Military uses them for disarming mines and eods. Because they are really good for punching through metal. If you used a standard 50bmg I’m curious if it’d still punch through.
That looked like ball ammo
It wasn’t a 50bmg to begin with mate
Plates looks about 5mm max, assuming it's angled 45° you get about 7mm of effective armor. Ball rounds can pen about 12 mm, I think it would go through(assuming it doesn't ricochet)
@@죽은_시민의_사회 I think ball round can pen 20 mm. Tungsten armor piercing can pen up to 30 mm
That was just lead. No tungsten penetrator, no mass-reactive space magic. Just a chunk of lead the size of your thumb moving really fast. Not special at all
My problem with this design is that the bullet might ricochet to another person close to them. Which can be hazardous if your give a whole squad of dudes these. But if I make some droids or killer robots with armor like this yeah that would be a lot more intimidating.
It would be best used for someone like an eod specialist, but for direct combat
The bullets disintegrate. The spalling end up in your arms and other exposed areas. If unlucky the soft underbelly of your Jaw.
@@dylanvaughn9600 Hmm that's interesting.
@@Bass_attack7755 Sounds Painful my friend.
Not good for Squad Breach Missions
17th century armor is the closest to angled armor it gets, but even they weren't stupid enough to make it ricochet bullets (for the most part...) Because it might save your life but your buddy next to you will eat more than his daily dose of shrapnel...
no they didn't intentionally make it slope, but rather to fit for the wearer and their armor always ricochet projectiles of the muskets since their standards of making 16th century bullet proof armor is around 4mm to above thick and their armor is either made from wrought iron or forge steel.
@@REMASTEREDAGAIN not true, could've just made it round or flat like other previous armor designs that could fit a wearer just as well, and most armor at the time was thick and heavy as you said, by making it slope in the front they could reduce the thickness a little though, using less material was preferable for cheaper manufacturing cost and wearer's comfort
@@birisuandrei1551 Incorrect they didn't make flat armor excemption to the kastenbrust since it has slope front, most armor are round to make it fit well to the wearer also not the have other parts limited or obstruct their movement, and also their armor from early plated armor to 18th century armor is commonly seen as rounded or rounded pike-nose shaped. Overall rounded shape is generally slope already around 15 degrees or 20. Penetration of musket firearms are base on to kinetic energy making thinner and sloper armor more useless meaning their penetration is base on that energy unlike today's firearm based on the charge of the cartridge note they used weaker charge.
The shrapnel will also fragment and go into your arms.
@@REMASTEREDAGAIN 14 and 15 century cuirasses were round to deflect spear blow (you can also track it in bascinet helmet with houndskull visor, that is conical) also great helmets had this central ridge and slopes to deflect spears too
2:20 bro looking at us like we did it🤣
They did experiment with angled body armour in World War 1. Look up Brewster Body Shield. It worked well to stop rifle bullets, but the armour overall was really cumbersome. Also, if too steeply angled, the bullet could ricochet into one of your buddies, so that's not something you would want.
I hope they didn't find out the hard way- bouncing bullet 🤣🤣
Ricochet into yer buddy, that wouldn't be ideal.
It seems to be more useful as a person alone going out as distraction to the enemy.
@@trevorallen3212 "YEAH, SEND ME, I'LL TAKE ALL THE BULLETS!"
What if they stood in a geese v formation? Or stood in a semi circle to send the bullets back to the enemy.
Historically armor has been made with deflection in mind, but modern armor prioritizes mobility.
Well arrows and bullets are different things
@@Demoneye097 Yeah! One is a projectile and the other is a... oh... shit.
@@Demoneye097 crosbow belts and apfsds rounds are basicaly same thing
And the point of angled armor is that it makes it harder to penetrate, while simultaneously reduce the material needed to reach specific deflection target. If you used to need a 90mm of steel to reach specific target, slope it 45 degrees and you will require only half of it (not exact math). Reduced armor => Reduced weight => Increased mobility
with exoskeletons maybe bulky angled mech armor makes comback
The benefit of angled armour isn't that it just increases the thickness for penetration but it also redirects the energy of the projectile. Similar to the way lighting will follow the path of least resistance, bullets still require "bite" before they can even begin to penetrate.
But they are kinda impractical and dangerous.
Redirects it to the side. Where your unarmored arms are...
@@sneeringimperialist6667 Here is a novel idea, corrugated armor. Put a layer of ceramic tiles at the front to break up the projectile, a metal plate made of triangles in the middle, and Kevlar a the back to catch spalling.
@@sheeplord4976 tanks use laminate armor similar to that.
Of course you need to bite before penetrating
Bro, that grouping from standing and at that rate of fire with a bolt action, was very impressive. Well done!
U seen that to ay ? Little distance it b more impressive,
That answers some questions I had.
Trying to make a manga, with guns and all, I thought "bullet are like tank round, but to protect tank we angled the armor, why not do the same with body armor ?" And then begun designing my characters armor with angled armor.
This video proves me that it works so thanks.
In theory, yes. In practice, only if you're facing dead on with the shooter
@@daz211 If you're been shot from the side or rear, angled armor or not it is pretty much the end for you
Atleast it works when you're facing the baddies and the impact of the bullet would hurt less since you have space between your armor and your chest and also you're maybe not going to fall to the ground after the first shot since the bullet bounce so it doesn't transfer all his energy to you (this argument is totally hypothetical, I have absolutely no idea what I am saying and I hope you or someone else can correct me if I say sh*t)
I was thinking that wouldn't it be more comfortable to use em like thin, lightweigjt forward facing ballistic shields? I mean as shown in the vid the sloped armor despite being thin is effective.
If used as body armor maybe make it like a 3 piece armor? 2 sloped left and right, and at the center/chest besides the sloped armor is a standard thick piece of flat metal, but then as much as possible the sloped areas are larger compared to the single-flat-armor.
@@Hurdlecurdle3321 you would not be able to move, even with a super cool exo skele, too much shit in the way
itd be cool for a machine though! like a robot/mech or vehic- oh wait
@@sirsnek6562 I mean, it can be configured so that you can still move when applied to an exo-skeleton, sure.
I like this video. No long redundant explanations, quick damage assessments, well timed transitions and cuts. Straight to the point
The problem with this concept is that it depends entirely on your directional relationship to the line of fire. If your assailant moves 10 degrees away from directly in front of you, the results will be devastating.
Ooh, ooh, I know! No worries if UR targeted not straight-on. Put the chest gable on a ball-bearing mount, and pay Raytheon to add a miniature radar with servos to quickly rotate armour into direction of incoming!
Same with modern plate armor.
Sides are not protected
Just make it into a tube 😂😂😂. It will be the most hilarious armour.
@@manzion7599might end up with a Gundam
@@manzion7599 звучит как если бы разработку бронеплит вели только немцы
David saying shut the f*ck up to the birds made me laugh
"this is a Barrett anti-material rifle"
Me: *psychotic giggles*
Big gun go brrrrrrr
well not exactly its in .416 which was more designed for long range ballistics rather than anti materiel properties and its kinda a weird pairing in a somewhat innacurate rifle but laws are laws and whatever
@@oranguman8606 yep, that’s if they filmed in California at least, the rest of the us with the exception of New York and other totalitarian states allow .50 cal like any other un neutered rifles lol
@@rumlad341 More like „big gun makes big booooom“
It's "anti-materiel" not "anti-material." If you don't believe me, look up the definition of the word "materiel."
I honestly didn't expect a random video about a body armour to be THIS hilarious. I love when ppl aren't afraid of putting some really good jokes in their videos! Great vid!
the casual "shut the fuck up" is where i subbed lmao 3:24
why is that gunshop built like an ammunation from gta
Coz gta used references
GTA fans when a normal gunshop
@@steven.2602GTA fans when they finally see the outdoors. "Hey this actually looks a lot like GTA!"
@@steven.2602 i'm a gta speedrunner imagine what the fuck they're thinking cause i have no idea either
2:17 The way he looked at my soul..
I always used to wonder why we never saw stuff like “polygonal armor” in semi-contemporary science fiction. Armor being able to “guide” bullets away from making a solid impact would genuinely be the coolest shit ever.
Except that its incredibly bulky and unweildy
@@fortnite.burger and the issue of bullets bouncing off into your body
@@burp2019 agreed
Tanks do it irl, become a tank
@@umbananaqualquer4052time to tankmaxx
Excellent name for the knife, I give it a 10/10
should have made it composite tank armour, so you would need a 152mm uranium depleted dart that can pierce 2000mm of steel so youre safe from any threat you might encounter in downtown la
The "Brewster Body Shield" from WW1 essentially used this exact concept to make an experimental, relatively lightweight bulletproof suit of armour, so that the troops of the Entente Powers could cross no-man's land and beat the Bosch. Ultimately not adopted, considered too heavy and bulky to be practical.
HOW MANY PEOPLE WOULD BE STRUCK FROM ALL THE RICOCHET?
Was there ever any use or idea of triangular shields that you would place down in front of you as make shift cover from bullets?
That didn’t look like a standard 50 round
i've been thinking about sloped armor plates for a while glad you made this video that finally answered my question all these years
The problem is the spalling. Those fragments will go into your extremities and if unlucky right into the soft underbelly of your jaw.
i cant see the reply so annoying yt bill gates whatever fix yo shit
@@fearlesskugkug5192 yeah, honestly
WHY IS THAT?!
The idea of angled armor is really cool. Hell I even saw a guy in a movie with that angled chest plate you use, but he had it covering his whole face with a narrow slit to see through. It looked weird, like he had a metal cheese head. But this is proof that his helmet would actually work. But feeling the Shockwaves from the bullets would probably be really bad on your body, still beats taking a bullet to the flesh of your face though.
2:15 "Any dents?"
"None"
Casually ignores shrapnel taking a big chunk of his arm out 💀💀
UA-cam when by yourself: *Family friendly content*
UA-cam when your mom walks in: 6:48
Would have been interesting to see how much angle the steel plate needs to deflect to bullet.
Pro tip: If you keep increasing the angle of incident the bullet eventually just misses.
Yeah thats a good question
Glad I stay subscribed to this channel. You guys always have some fire content out of nowhere.
123 👍
@@bensoncheung2801 1234 👍
If you were to make another one of these, my suggestion is to feature a piece of tool-hardened bar stock at the front intersection of the plates, weld both plates to it at the desired angle leaving space in the middle inside, then welding a second smaller piece of softer steel on the inside where the plates intersect. It creates a much larger surface area where the plates are connected and such a configuration would be capable of taking direct hits to the front of the armor. It's not that much more effort, or weight - but it would dramatically improve the structural integrity and durability of the armor.
I applaud you for calling the Barrett a "Anti-Material Rifle" instead of the COD fans "MUHH SNIPER RIFLE!!"
5:45 the doll held it long enough.
That style of armor became popular in the 16th century when black powder guns and crossbows starting making appearance on the battlefields, breast plates, shields and even helms started being made with sharp angular plates like this in order to deflect these powerful weapons that could penetrate armor.
That's a really cool experiment, thanks!
BTW why were certain segments blurred like welding, loading a magazine etc? Did YT update their stupid TOS again for gun videos?
0:39 was this the movie fury? just curious
Yep
Yeah
I'd love to get my hands on a fat PP, but with shipping it's 78 bucks...a bit too steep for me!
Love the idea though!
Oh that's definitely not right! It's fixed now.
@@RyanKung Now it's a lot more reasonable! Thanks for sorting it out.
least expensive international shipping for an american small business
Gerber make a knife very similar and its been out for 3 years out and has good warrenty
@@Tjkruse9889 or you can support small businesses like this one.
that shotgun's power really BLEW his mind.
...
But in the end it left his mind more grounded.
Any guy behind this armor: My torso is safe but now I’m armless
2:18 the manequin looks at the camera with a face that says "you kiddin me?"
5:13
Material girls: 😭😭😭😭😭
2:46
best way to shoot somebody with triangular body armor
step 1: shoot the rope thats carrying the armor so the armor drops
Always amazed in such american videos about how little the bother about the behind the target safety.
Okay hear me out: FAT PP = Brilliant idea
However i come to you with an additional concept.
What if we combined it... with a refillable butane lighter? Or even a micro usb rechargeable electric arc lighter?
Portable heat sources are always handy to have just like a tool like a knife. And at my work i get asked for both equally. So why not combine the two and save even more precious pocket space?
People should stop having the idea lighters or portable heat sources are only for smokers I think everyone should carry them they are really useful
@@whyareusobad3528 my point exactly c:
Especially in a survival situation having a knife and a heat source could be the difference between life and death
Also fat PP is the best name for a product I’ve ever heard
@@azmitzy that’s why I mentioned a lighter I know somebody that would have died they got lost outside in the snow with 1 other person the other guy was a smoker my friend wasn’t
They were both lost and the fact the smoker had a lighter saved both their
lives
if your asking what they burned because it’s snow they burned a Burger King receipt and like 120$ for warmth
Fat PP, the Ps stand for Poke and Power!
“Whats the most unexpected thing to happen”
“A man that owns a tesla, but has 60 firearms in the trunk”
I totally lost it on the Barrett test when the dummy fell forward. This is my first exposure to your content and had to subscribe. Great job uploader.
2:18 me guarding the roku remote from my family while I am in the middle of a show in the main living room and they all come pouring into the house
the AR wasn't shooting low, the optic and bore have an offset at short distance. for example, if the parallel sight line of your optic is 3" above the bore of your barrel, at 15 yards you can expect your point of aim and point of impact to about 3" offset. there's more to it than that, but that's the gist of it.
0:25 picture from Parola tank museum in Hämeenlinna finland
Love how you guys got straight to the point in the video and didn't waste any time in the introduction
Well guess that’s why many old fashioned armours were p rounded/slanted and/or pointy. Nowadays probably not the most convenient nor effective shape, but (imho) I think it would be pretty useful for shields. First time on the channel, very entertaining contents pal, thanks for sharing it
I think it is pretty amazing that .223 and .308 can be deflected by your 45 degree angle steel plate prototype. This is probably why some curiassier armor would deflect sword and lance points, and possibly musket balls. How ever, like the .50 cal anti-material round, Napoleonic Cavalry armor would not deflect cannon balls. What type of hardened steel did you use?
hey it only deflected once, odds are it was dumb luck, that was total overkill, assault rifles would probably go through eventually
It wasnt even 50 bmg. Cali banned 50 cals which forced Barrett to ironically make a less powerful, but better long range round called the 416 Barrett.
As cool of a video this is, wearing triangular body armor wouldn’t be a great idea for a multitude of reasons like mobility and ability to do certain things like lie down on your stomach. But other than that, a bullet being deflected to the left or right could cause fragmentation to hit your arms or hand or other body parts, depending on where they get deflected to
Put more armor in the legs and arms
or the stray rounds could fuck your battle buddy up
@@skeletoninatuxedo7147 fuck that guy, he made fun of me
At least you have a higher chance to survive
Now hear me out, angled shield. Collapse able but default return position is in a solid non segmented faced shield
2:11 detroit simulator
American schools simulator
1:05 why are you masking the grinding? Is that one of those stupid UA-cam rules?
An interesting idea for sure, but it would sort of be negated if a person was not shooting at you directly from the front, if they shout at you from like 10 or 2 o clock it’s just a straight shot this way. And most combatants don’t stand facing directly forward, a rifle shooting stance is canted inward so it’s likely that the impact from someone in front of your line of sight would hit the armor straight on. Also hope you don’t value your arms much… or people near you- yeah maybe it’s safer for personal body armor to just absorb and not ricochet 😂 love the video though hilarious
What about a modern full plate armor full with curves and chambers? Sure, would be a nightmare to engineer and prolly one to put it in the first place but hey!
I really wouldn’t worry about the shouting from any angle. It’s the rounds you need to worry about.
@@somenygaard 🤦♂️ you got me lol. INTRODUCING: SAFE SPACE ARMOR! Protects your fragile heart emotionally as well as physically!
U could definitely put more angles on it and even a few more on the inside to deflect again if it does go through. It would be really heavy though
I don’t remember why I subscribed but I’m happy I did
I was thinking the same thing
Same
I don't even remember subscribing
Same
Uhh same. Not really sure what is going on here
Probably effective for home defense since most of the robbers carry pistols. Rather than making a slanted armor, you can create a huge triangular shield that you can carry around which can cover your head and body when being shoot at.
So basically a riot shield
Then the bullets deflect and hit a family member. Good thinking.
Like pyramid head?
@@johnm3907 Better odds of them living from the triangular riot shield deflection over being shot without any protection.
@@johnm3907 you guys need to start armoring your family
I like how the manequin looks at a camera at 2:19 and was like why am I here
I'd actually been thinking about a concept similar to this, though taller and more narrow. I'm interested in tanks and had the same thought on body armour's strike face, toying around with the idea of affixing a piece of steel to the front of a plate carrier.
Light and angular, covering around 30-50% of the carrier, with the idea being that you create a shot trap that would deflect most of the energy of a bullet's impact off the center of the carrier.
I appreciate the video, it shows that there's promise in the idea, just got to put it together and go through testing.
so pretty much angled spaced armour but for personal use. Like the welded on plates on the T26E4 Super Pershing hull
neat design! Any info available on the steel and factory producing it?
probably ar500 its shit
5:59
"actually. that migh-"
4:24 what did I missed?
I think the most dangerous aspect of this kind of armour is the increased risk of ricochet hitting a team member. The reduced damage is a trade off between the amount of energy sapped from the projectile. Shame really because it make a huge difference to the integrity of the plates.
Still, i think its better to have a casual chance to ricochet into a team member than a certain direct body hit into you or anyone from your crew
Who care about teammate if YOU lived at the end of the day gotta look out for #1
3:38 Yeaq
Could be cool for a shield to use alongside standard body armor
I like the way you think...
7:36 Love the design, I think the only thing missing for the Fat PP is a small hook slot cuz those tiny pockets are a pain to get anything out of them if they go too deep inside.....
1:10 "this paper-thin steel"
WHAT KIND OF PAPER ARE YOU USING?
!
Wood paper
one huge detractor from the sloped body armor is the "spalling, shrapnel, or bullet fragments"( pick the name you prefer). The armor you made is too wide for the wearer to use his arms and still his arms are getting ripped up. Make the armor narrow enough for good arm motion and every round would rip up the arm on the impact side disabling the wearer. Modern approved armor is designed to capture those tiny high velocity razor blades.
if he makes it any smaller the armor won't fit and the rounds would just ricochet into his body.
@@potatoman7594 ya, so then just make it like proper body armor, this design is a total failure, Hollywood would have you believe that bullet/fragmentation wounds to the arm are nothing to worry about,,, but there are a few arteries in the upper arm/shoulder region that can bleed you out in minutes.
It seems like a pretty decent idea as the military uses it for deflecting bullets away from their vehicles which isn't really a problem if they're ricocheting off around a bunch of other armored vehicles.
If you have a group of people and they're all wearing this type of body armor and the bullets are being deflected off to the sides, not so much up or down, what does that mean for the rest of the troops around you?
What would be really interesting is if you did a slow motion video showing semi automatic rapid fire at the V armor just to see where all the bullets would be flying and who would be getting taken out.
Now, we need some way to have a man sized chunk of triangular armor, maybe with power and something that can go over rough terrain.
We could even put tracks on it for mobility. Maybe a cannon+mg on top
I like that, you would be ready to fight other armored fellows. The cannon should be able to rotate...
Wait a minute that's a tank!
A what?
6:26 How has no one commented on the Texas book depository joke yet?
because i don’t get it
@@Barrinetic Lee Harvey Oswald was inside the Texas School Book Depository when he assassinated JFK with a sniper rifle.
@@Longest_boi ooh
@@Barrinetic a *mindblowing* realization
What is the joke? Please, i need to know so i Can use it too.
We need polygon armour on the field now
The reason its not used is because you need to Stop and CAPTURE the round not just deflect it.... Look at the spatter of the bullet as it breaks up upon impact..... its completely shredding the mannequins arms.
Okay, just saying, shooting high energy rounds like .50 BNG against metal targets is quite dangerous in the slim chance it ricochets someone could get hurt
well theyre only shooting .416 so its completely safe
@@oranguman8606 Is that what that was? I new I wasn't crazy thinking that round was waaaay too short
This makes me think of plate armor and how it’s curved to deflect attacks. I wonder how this would work if it was curved instead of angled.
The geometry is sound and works. The issue is bulk, protecting your arms, and as many have pointed out. The design is only effective with the V facing the shooter. If the shooter is at an angle to you, it defeats the deflection function of the V plate.
In fairness, the .50 BMG and similar rounds from the era were designed to beat light tank armor, which combines sloping with other fancy concepts so it's not too surprising it went through. Still very entertaining though, especially when the dummy slumped over at the perfect moment 😂
It wasnt 50 bmj. This barrett was chambered in 416 barrett which does not have any kind of penetrator core. Its a smaller and less powerful version because CA banned 50 cals.
What caliber is that Barrett? It's not a .50, .416 maybe?
Great video. I lol'd when the mannequin's head came off.
yeah, i have a 50bmg casing and bullet next to me, thats definetly not a .50 , its most likely a 416 barret
The only problem with the armor is it’s sending the shrapnel from the rounds into the arms which still has the potential to be deadly
Change the design then... Make it like a shield for your non dominant arm so when you are aiming with your gun, literally below the barrel you have this triangle/angled "shield" that cover both your arms and chest.... Probably a bit uncomfortable that way but we saw in the video it's effective
Maybe add a curved edge? So it deflects as usual, but gets glided/slid away from the target.
Me: wondering about my AR-15's over-penetration in a home defense scenario.
Ryan: "sloped armor!" 😅
You probably know this, but main reason body armour absorbs instead of deflect, is it can be unpredictable and a deflected bullet would probably hit someone else
0:56 but judging by the roblox pfp you probably aren’t too attentive
Just let your buddy also wear one so the bullet keeps bouncing.
Yes and because spalling, in this, they used a very high quality and thin steel, but and only shot it probably 20 times, if over 60 hit, it would send fragments into the body, with kevlar this issue is almost non existent
😭
😭
“Now the internet can’t bully me anymore” proceeds to miss a shot from like 25 feet with a scoped rifle 😂 pp=👌🏻
Doesn't mean it's zeroed in... Or that he knows what height over bore is lol
@@marcusborderlands6177 you clearly missed the point of it being a joke lmao. Calm down armchair gun specialist 😂🤦🏻♂️
4:30 GTA ahh gun store
3:25 You know they shot that bird 🐦 afterwards 🤣🤣
That’s a dope little knife!
You know, I have harbored that idea for a long ass time. Deployable cover by smacking down a little metal wall in front of you to have cover and a place to mount your weapon was a good concept, but what if it was just a sharply angled sheet of metal? Wouldn't bullets just ricochet off regardless of most ammunition types? Sure it needs to be kinda dense but it doesn't need to be ultra thick and whaddya know, here's a video for it! :D
You want it waffled instead of a single angle, people are going to want to flank you anyways.
Deflection angle is a problem for you - or more precisely the people to your left or right side. If you were using this as armour, your troops would need to keep a very wide long triangular route, so that the people beside you don't get hit by ricochets
you are unlikely to have soldiers bunched up regardless though.. thats a receipe for disaster when explosives exist.
It's very brave of you to show that shot where you missed the target 10m away with a giant-ass scope on your gun
I like when 4:06
Me on my way to get a.snack I 3:00 am 4:19
Edit: penguin
1:50 swerved off and hit straight in the shoulder, congrats! You've dropped whatever you were using to protect yourself, and you're injured!
And yeah Ik this is supposed dumb and stupid, that's why Iade this comment...
Better than immediate death.
if you can fight left handed
@@leomomoeda10or fight with an injured shoulder
I’m Australian, can someone tell me why he blurred out at 1:23? Cheers
man wish you guys uploaded more often