This is a 2017 year old video but i am commenting now in 2021. You are a gift to this world and to your lucky students. what would I not do for your one face to face meet up! You are a genius. Expressions to the point. Love you
Your channel is an absolute GOD SEND. Thank you for the clarity you provide around the literature review, particularly your points around the different ways to integrate literature into your final paper.
People say: good doctor knows how to heal you, same as teacher , good teacher knows how to put things in your head. Thank you. Amazing 👏 it's great to hear you and follow you.
Thank you... this is a wonderful piece. I was stuck in my literature review, I was finding it hard to plough through the drudge of litter in order to report factual prose after prose. This footage gave has given me hope and direction to proceed with my immunology based introduction (literature review). I agree what is the point of spewing out the same prose, a higher analysis of works is required!! Thank u
Gosh, I am so so so very grateful for your clarity and knowledge sharing. It is making the world of difference in making these topics accessible to me for my research. Thank you, Tara.
Dear Professor, Thank you for this wonderful knowledge dissemination on ROL. May I please request a session -Vlog on Theoretical review that is often spoken and even chapterised in a thesis? Also, please include how our area of study (thesis statement) and such a theoretical review ane linked? Thank You for BEING (Ontology) there for us.
Thank you Tara- This is extremely timely for the PGDip study course I am doing at present- all prep for the later work I am planning, and you have almost convinced me that a systematic review of EC learning/pedagogy papers may be the way to go about organizing and connecting the myriad of small studies I have found on my topic up to date. If I heard you correctly, the ontology, epistemology and methodology used for making the point of each of these papers can be clearly identified to signpost the direction each takes and why it is useful in my own quest. Am I right in my understanding from this, that a straight literature review can be accommodated with headings in each chapter provided it is introduced, its relevance demonstrated and the whole seamlessly joined to the data I introduce in the chapter? Can a systematic review be relevantly divided up in this way as well? Cathy Jones.
First off thank you Tara for an awesome video or should I say channel? I first saw this video in a lecture on research methods for my first year undergrad degree (I'm a small fry in the academic world) but having aspirations to go into the world of academia after finishing my undergrad. You've given me some great insight into what to expect later down the track as well as some research tips that I will try to implement early on and hopefully master before reaching honours and post-grad. Keep up the amazing work, Adam Ps totally haven't binge watched/listened to a number of vlogs while writing my assignments
This is a 2017 year old video but i am commenting now in 2021. You are a gift to this world and to your lucky students. what would I not do for your one face to face meet up! You are a genius. Expressions to the point. Love you
You are a gift, Tara! Thank you for these tips. Your enthusiasm is infectious; I want to go and get my reading done right now.
The presentation is superb 👍👍👍 . The content is still relevant to date . I recommend Masters & PHD students to watch.
Your channel is an absolute GOD SEND. Thank you for the clarity you provide around the literature review, particularly your points around the different ways to integrate literature into your final paper.
Fantastic overview, so helpful, and love your passion!
Love watching your videos, Prof.Tara, you are a flame of enthusiasm and inspiration!
You are superstar ...Love watching your videos...
People say: good doctor knows how to heal you, same as teacher , good teacher knows how to put things in your head. Thank you. Amazing 👏 it's great to hear you and follow you.
Thank you... this is a wonderful piece. I was stuck in my literature review, I was finding it hard to plough through the drudge of litter in order to report factual prose after prose. This footage gave has given me hope and direction to proceed with my immunology based introduction (literature review). I agree what is the point of spewing out the same prose, a higher analysis of works is required!! Thank u
Thanks Prof Tara
Excellent video. Impressive and charming speech.
Gosh, I am so so so very grateful for your clarity and knowledge sharing. It is making the world of difference in making these topics accessible to me for my research. Thank you, Tara.
Thank you so much. A very helpful breakdown.
Thanks for the insights.
A very engaging briefing; informative and inspiring. Tks so much.
This was the best tips for a literate review I've ever heard. Love you Tara!
Thank you so much Tara,
Dear Professor, Thank you for this wonderful knowledge dissemination on ROL. May I please request a session -Vlog on Theoretical review that is often spoken and even chapterised in a thesis? Also, please include how our area of study (thesis statement) and such a theoretical review ane linked? Thank You for BEING (Ontology) there for us.
So beautiful. You have ENLIVENED or LIT the Lit Review for me. Thank you, Prof. Tara!
Luz, paz e amor
I swear, I love you!!! Your videos have been incredibly helpful. Thank you
Thank you very muchTara
Thank you 🙏🏾
Fab video...thanks! What is a standard Lit Review length - typically? I am in an MA Humanities program. Cheers!
You are such a treasure! Thank you for sharing such an amazing exprience!
Thanks. Video content is lit💥
thanks I'm in this phase now
Thank you Tara- This is extremely timely for the PGDip study course I am doing at present- all prep for the later work I am planning, and you have almost convinced me that a systematic review of EC learning/pedagogy papers may be the way to go about organizing and connecting the myriad of small studies I have found on my topic up to date.
If I heard you correctly, the ontology, epistemology and methodology used for making the point of each of these papers can be clearly identified to signpost the direction each takes and why it is useful in my own quest. Am I right in my understanding from this, that a straight literature review can be accommodated with headings in each chapter provided it is introduced, its relevance demonstrated and the whole seamlessly joined to the data I introduce in the chapter? Can a systematic review be relevantly divided up in this way as well? Cathy Jones.
Thank you
Really enjoying these videos! This one was super useful for me right now!
First off thank you Tara for an awesome video or should I say channel?
I first saw this video in a lecture on research methods for my first year undergrad degree (I'm a small fry in the academic world) but having aspirations to go into the world of academia after finishing my undergrad. You've given me some great insight into what to expect later down the track as well as some research tips that I will try to implement early on and hopefully master before reaching honours and post-grad.
Keep up the amazing work,
Adam
Ps totally haven't binge watched/listened to a number of vlogs while writing my assignments
❤️
Love watching your videos, Prof.Tara, you are a flame of enthusiasm and inspiration!