Tudor Pelagos 39: In-depth review + comparison
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 сер 2024
- Check out our watch strap shop - 10% off when you buy 2 NATO Straps:
barkandjack.com
Hands-on review of the new 2022 Tudor Pelagos 39 and comparison to the Tudor Pelagos 42 and Tudor Black Bay 58
Pelagos 39 vs Pelagos 42
Pelagos 39 vs BB58
Pelagos 39 vs BlackBay 58
00:00 Introduction
01:05 Black Bay Vs Pelagos
01:47 Tudor Pelagos 39 Specs
03:11 Pelagos 39 vs Pelagos 42
03:40 Pelagos 39 weight
#BarkAndJack #Tudor #Rolex - Навчання та стиль
You dropped a big piece of information here and I hope people catch it. You don’t take money from brands even for travel and hotel to the press events and releases. This is huge. Mad respect Adrian for staying independent. Also this goes without saying, outstanding video. Keep up the great work.
Thanks a lot mate. The more I learn about media, more I’m keen to stay independent. It’s more simple and enjoyable.
To me the 39 is just a cheaper more budget option even less costs to compare to the old ones 42 with the two colors. Still no innovation yet it's the opposite.
Perhaps the current economic situation ! No mention some of the new Pelagos is ETA based, (I think)
Well to me it doesn’t sell out anything if they paid for Adrian’s travel and hotel to attend the event
@@biggiebeil5118 nope. It’s in-house like the 58 line.
@@DeeKay1911 I don’t think it’s selling out, it just goes to show the lengths he goes to eliminate any potential or perceived conflicts of interest.
It’s been said plenty in the comments but bears repeating: this is undoubtedly the best review of the Pelagos 39! You threw a ton of information at us in an immensely informative, engaging, and aesthetically pleasing way! I especially appreciate the inclusion of dial width in the measurements breakdown. Fantastic work Adrian :)
I am an occasional watcher since the beginning of your channel... And I think that this review was the most professional review I've ever seen. The editing, the information ... It is quite awesome to watch you grow as a professional.. Thanks man, not only for the reviews.. thanks for being true to yourself while trying to make money for a living.. thanks for not stopping, thanks for not selling yourself to big brands (hope you don't do it, please don't).. Thanks for motivating people work hard and chase passion...
I feel like this will be Tudors best selling watch over the next couple of years. It’s a one watch collection for sure.
I’ve got it and it’s very comfortable and wearable. I wish it had a date function. That’s the only thing it is missing.
This is why I love Tudor. To me personally, they are the perfect intersection of tough tools that are well made, but are also luxurious enough to give me that special feeling when I put them on my wrist. Now, I have to say I'm relatively new to the Watch hobby. I've only been seriously interested and doing research for probably the last year or so. That being said, in my short time with watches, Tudor has become my absolute favorite brand. My favorite thing about watches is having a thing on your wrist that is useful to tell time, but that also makes you feel a certain way when you look down at it. When I look down at my wrist and I see the Black Bay GMT, I see a reliable old friend that reminds me to book that trip to Africa i've always wanted to take, and take that watch with me because it is well made and functional enough to survive almost anything, but beautiful and wonderful enough to make it feel special when I put it on. When I look at this new Pelagos, I see a watch that is begging to be taken to the lake and to the beach, something that is more than happy to go diving or spearfishing, and then go to the restaurant that night with a sports coat on. If I had it my way my collection would almost be all Tudor haha. Anyway, sorry for the rant, I just have alot of feelings about Tudor. Great review, I will add the 39mm Pelagos to the list of other Tudors I want, but it's moving to the front of the line!
@@toziassmitt I'd never take a expensive watch Diving , Dive boats are crowded & things get bounced around very easy to damage a watch that cost thousands. Buy a good cheap watch and you'll enjoy the dive better & won't be worried about the watch . the watch is mostly for me looks anyway the dive master usually keeps track of of the time.
Cameron, I'm with you buddy. Mechanical (and quartz) watches are a very cool intersection between art, style, technology and function. This newest release from Tudor is hard to say no to for me as well.
@Cameron Buckner I agree with you whole heartedly. I’m just returning from a trip to Greece (Athens, Crete, Santorini) and of all my watches to choose from my Tudor BB 58 Navy received the honors. Why? It’s a beautiful timepiece to feel like you have something special on your wrist and it doubles as a beach to tux watch. Mornings on the shores of Crete and evenings dressed up at the restaurant. I have a Pepsi, Sprite, Daytona, and a Seamaster 300 vintage and the BB58 was perfect.
@@oneal14attnet Kinda jealous of your Greece adventure not going to lie haha! But i'm glad you had a good time and your got to enjoy your watch in its element!
@@toziassmitt I bought bb58 for everyday use, I use the bezel to time certain things on my work. I'm not diver but not a office worker either. It's literally a tool for me. I don't understand when people say that you can't use luxury watch as a tool watch.
That window in the background gave away that you were a fellow head-banging metalhead in the mid 2000s... been to Camden Underworld at least once! 😜
I think Tudor did a great job with sizing the Pelagos 39. The lug-to-lug is just right for me, and the 12mm thickness is a reflection of the times, and still practical. I even prefer titanium over stainless steel. The 21mm wide straps might be annoying, but it won’t prevent the use of 22mm or 20mm straps. Criticism- I prefer captive bezels, like those found on most Breitlings and Sinns. I’m rough on tool watches, and I’ve seen a few bezels become lost- I don’t want to worry about lost bezels. I realize that this is a personal preference, and that most people-the vast majority of customers, don’t have to worry about this. So put that on my wish list, Tudor, along with a 36mm titanium Ranger and a Ti BB Pro with a white dial.
I bought this watch almost a year ago. Wore it in the rubber strap until last week. I put the bracelet back on. I have worn the watch 24/7. It’s spent a huge amount of time covered in sand at the beach. I’ve not looked after it on purpose to see how it would go. It looks brand new. Has a couple dents on the bezel. The sand did get into the bezel but with soap it washed out. Awesome watch.
Great video Adrian. The P42 black is my watch and I love it. Originally I preferred the blue but went with the black & very happy now as it is the more versatile combination in my opinion and a classic look too. With regards to the P39 - I like it but think it misses some of the uniqueness of the larger watch which I think is a negative - 3D dial, date complication, expanding clasp. The other things I like about the 42 are the matt dial and bezel - they appear clearer. The size of the 42 doesn’t worry me - not sure the 39 is such an advantage and the sunburst dial and agree the marketing is a bit confusing for a tool watch. Interesting watch though and will look for one in the flesh to make my final opinion.
PS. Thanks for the 2 x straps I bought last year - they have been great. Roger.
Been waiting for this review since the launch. Hands down best review of the Pelagos 39. Great content!
Thanks a lot Simon 🙌🏻
Great review Adrian! I was sitting on the fence on this but have since told my AD that I'm interested in one.
Had the 42mm but sold it a few months ago. Beastly is the word, you're right about it. I found that it didn't sit balanced on my wrist.
Also love the fact that this has no date. Makes the dial beautifully balanced.
In your past vids you've explained the rationale of not accepting sponsorship or payment from brands. Major respect!
If there's a way the watch community can help defray the cost, it will be our pleasure to do so! Cheers mate.
Nuff said. I'm heading to the other channel to see you and Andrew and George tearing one another to pieces. Love 💕 that 🤣
Great review of the 39. The lug to lug comparison was interesting. Seeing them side by side on the wrist, really brought out the size difference’s. Great camera work!
Adrian, I’ve been a follower for a long time and you absolutely KILLED this review. Thank you so much. You officially have the best review of this watch hands down and I’ve seen like 10 on UA-cam. Keep making the amazing content and I agree with every single point you made.
Thanks so much Spencer. Really appreciate that mate. 🙌🏻
Agree on this. Brilliant and honest review.
@Adrian, please make 21mm straps, I need one for my Grand Seiko Shunbun pliz!
I agree what this guy said. Smashed this one Adrian.
I still love the look of the Black Bay 58. It may well date, but that's not always necessarily a bad thing. Vintage counts for a lot.
They are already vintage inspired. What he saying is that the "vintage look" is falling out of style.
@@ppbur
Sure, that’s why Tudor just released the BB Pro and Ranger.
@@ppbur You're right. I think what I was trying to say is that it will develop its own individual "vintage". It's a wonderful irony that for the Black Bay 58 their emulation of a vintage mode has given rise to a form that may in itself develop into what in posterity will be seen as its own classic / vintage look.
Style will always be in, but fashion always changes & then comes back around again!
Yep!!! 58 looks gorgeous 😍 but that P39 WoW, looks like the best diver yet again in that price point
Like others I've now seen most reviews of this watch and others can't come close to this. You're the only "watch guy" I'm following for a reason; facts, quality and hands on. I'm glad you are around to cover things like this and I would love to support your store with future purchases when I get my first watch.
I’ve been waiting for you to review this watch, those two straps you demonstrated look great 👍
I fell in love with the Pelagos 42 but always knew it was a no go with my thin wrists, this 39 may just be feasible! Thanks Tudor. Great review Adrian as always
oh... this is the best review I've every seen you do. Keep doing it like this, please. You are bang on about the bonkers marketing.
I own six tudors (thank you Gary at RL Austen, who also sold me my first datejust in 1984) but, I have always resisted the Pelagos... until now.
An outstanding review Adrian! Having the three watches to compare and contrast provided the best approach to share your perspective on the Pelagos 39. For many of us in the watch community, you gave us all the details we need to frame whether the Pelagos 39 should be pursued or not. I agree with you, it could be a one-watch collection.
Was anxiously awaiting your video on this! Beautifully done.
Intentionally the single best Rolex submariner alternative. Going to be massively popular.
I wished they brought back the tudor submariner nameplate, as this is the modern interpretation. Also, would eliminate the need for a BB58 & keeping the Pelagos for those who want a 42mm.
Exactly my thoughts.
Agreed
Omega Planet Ocean Liquid Metal Limited Edition, way cooler and rarer
Easily goes to the Seamaster 300m…
Absolutely love the direction they've taken with the Pelagos 39. The red text and subtle sunburst finishes really bring some much needed warmth to the rather clinical Pelagos 42. Having owned a Pelagos LHD, I would take the Pelagos 39 any day.
Loved this review Adrian, one of the best you’ve done! Really great to see the 3 model comparison!
Always the best reviews on UA-cam! Thanks for the excellent and entertaining overview Adrian.
I think the Pelagos 39, being a toolwatch needs a date just like the 42. It would be even more versatile. A datewindow on the 6 would make it an almost perfect one-watch watchcollection. Great job Adrian and well done Tudor!
Loving the lume pip ear lobe
Lots of folks making more watch videos, but no one is making better watch videos! You rock, Adrian!
Perfect video!
All features of the watch are described, and the comparison with the BB59 and the regular Pelagos is necessary to understand rte pros and cons of this watch,
As a marketer myself I also appreciated the last part with the analisys of the positioning of this watch.
A very smart move by Tudor, making a more compact, thinner version of the original Pelagos that will appeal to a much wider audience. I think it has a more handsome dial than the 42's stepped design and like the 3D lumed markers and the solid in-house COSC movement similar to the BB58. Offering a titanium bracelet with the T-Fit clasp (instead of that ratchet-spring oddity) and a complimentary rubber strap is a big plus. For me it's a latter-day nod to the great 5-digit Rolex Sub in its overall dimensions and versatility - tough, yet can be worn with any attire and exuding quality. The 21mm lug width is a bit strange however.
Hey Adrian , I have had my Pelagos for 4 years now and there is not a mark/scratch on the strap or the watch. I think the Titanium option for Tudor is a great one. Makes the watch much more wearable. Great video BTW, love the comparison. I think the full size BB heritage is much better than the 58!
It’s always so fun to listen to your ramblings, thanks Adrian
This watched pricked my interest and I knew you'd be thorough. I've watched only a few of your videos but this one has won you a new subscriber. Liking your style, keep going. Thank you.
As a skinny wristed watch lover, I love seeing watch brands with 40 or 39mm options, it really opens up a lot of watches to people who would otherwise not be able to pull it off. I also think the 21mm lugs were a mistake, but the bracelet looks so good I don’t think it matters in this case. I would choose a Pelagos over a BB any day.
Black Bay is nice but I just can't do the gold. Gotta be black and white for me.
Titanium is perfect for function (better than 316L/904L for salt water), but really leaves something to be desired in terms of weight and will also patina more than SS. HUGE difference in wrist feel and yeah, some people may like Titanium on the wrist, but a $4,000 watch that has no heft is not something a lot of people will get behind. I would have purchased the Pelagos if it was made in SS. Ended up with 79230B BB Heritage 41MM and am very happy.
@@pmolitierno personally i think this whole weight criticism for titanium is silly. Weight doesn’t equal quality and coming from someone who lives in a hot climate, titanium is far more comfortable to wear than stainless steel. I would personally buy any watch in titanium over SS, given the choice.
@@j2dlyc Pelagos is a fantastic watch if you prefer titanium. the bracelet expansion feature is also a plus as well for hot climate as my Heritage 41 lacks this feature and I have noticed it on occasion.
Another entertaining & excellent review. I use to own the P42 but I sold it to buy the BB58. Although I prefer the reduction in size I think the downgrade in the specs on the P39 doesn't warrant it being a Pelagos anymore. It seems to me the P39 is just a titanium BB58 with a snowflake dial. I know it's been mentioned countless times that 500m WR is overkill & therefore the HEV is not necessary on the P39. But once you remove that important feature which is what made the Pelagos what it was, then you essentially just have a fancier version of the BB58. Similarly if you replaced the 1220m depth rating on the Rolex Sea-Dweller to 300m, it then becomes a Submariner. I think everyone has overlooked the fact the Pelagos has been castrated. Gloss over it if you will by arguing that no human being is going to be capable of diving 500m. However I'm sure people would change their minds if you compare this with supercars. If you reduced the max speed on a Ferrari from 350km to 150km but kept the design the same and charged the same price, how many would Ferrari sell? You could argue that nobody should be legally driving more than 150km anyway but the point is it's capability of being able to go 350km is why you want the Ferrari. And speaking of the price, I don't think the P39 is a value proposition at the price point. I think the BB58 is still the winner. The technical specs are equal and the BB58 with a 20mm lug width compared to the 21mm it is more versatile for swapping straps. The guilt dial also makes it more interesting. I don't think it will ever be less desirable than the sterile look of the Pelagos line. The other point I'd like to mention is the incorrect view of the BB58 being less tool watch than the P39. What justifies this? It's got the same tech specs as the P39 except it's made out of steel. Is steel less tool watch than titanium? Lighter yes but not as versatile in my opinion. Also, the BB58 is often described as being a fashion dive watch. However it needs to be reminded that it was designed as a homage to the original dive watches back in the 1950's. It is therefore taking it's DNA from the original tool watch.
You're equating the engine of a car with the water resistance of a watch, not a good analogy imo. A better one would be having a Range Rover with no tow bar, because a big 4x4 is meant for working in fields and pulling trailers but actually you just like the way it looks and all you use it for is dropping the kids off at school. And if you do need to ford a particularly large puddle it can handle it.
The looks are subjective. I like the BB58 but not so much it's bracelet with the polish and the faux rivets, and the aluminum bezel is a big sticking point, it's just never gonna age well. The P39 is sterile but I don't think it puts any toes out of line, apart from the 21mm lug width.
"the incorrect view of the BB58 being less tool watch than the P39. What justifies this?"
The lack of crown guards and the polished case?
Yet another graet review, Adrian. I have always yearned for a Pelagos, in black, since 2012, mainly because it looks so great. With a big wrist the size has nevered bothered me, but wow, the 39 has to be the best looking watch on the planet, for me, anyway. I just love divers, the best looking one recently, for me, must be the Seiko MPB143. This has finally topped it, I just need to scrape together £3500 and all will be cushty.
The coffee stirring in the shot at 10:17 was a cool touch. Love your content mate
I just wished they consolidated the BB & the P39 and reissued the tudor submariner nameplate. Ultimately, the P39 is the modern tudor sub we all wanted.
the name is all just hype.
This will only happen when Rolex retires the Submariner name from their range. In other words: never.
@@explorerjlc1743 That name is what people want.
@@bigmacdaddy1234 not me. Can care less for marketing gimmicks
@@explorerjlc1743 when you get down to it, all this watch hooey is a gimmick.
Great review Adrian 🙏👏. At this price point, I am sold. Name was down straight away, forecast is 2024 🤣
This is the review I’ve been waiting for. I think you’re the only reviewer who’s flagged up the bezel appearing grey-ish in some lights - personally, I think it looks great. I think the matt, “silk-like” sheen is great too - and I like the flat, dullish grey of the titanium.
I’ve had a no-date Rolex Submariner on my watch “wishlist” for a while… occasionally something else will catch my eye for a bit, but I always return to the classic proportions and intrinsic “tooliness” of the sub (albeit luxury tooliness! - but you’ve got to love a beautifully constructed tool). I think Tudor may have just displaced Rolex with this watch. I love it.
I know you’re a submariner owner too - I’d love a side-by-side comparison with the Pelagos 39 in the style of this video.
More power to your elbow. (I was going to say wrist - but that’s just wrong!).
I was waiting for this review to decide. You nailed it. Thank you for helping me decide to get this. 😊🍻
I really, really like this watch, and have started saving for the inevitable blue version in a year or so. The fully lumed indices is a fantastic development. Really glad to hear the sunburst is subdued, that was a big concern. I have 3 complaints, which I think are more mised opportunities more than anything: 1 - it should have the cut-out rehaut. I think someone will make a few quid doing an after-market one. 2 - the tip of the second hand should be red to pick up the red text, only one detail being red doesn't quite work. 3 - they should have made this one meet ISO 6425 and had DIVER'S 200m on the dial, justification for this in the next comment.
Tudor sits between Seiko and Omega in the "legit diver's watch that actual militaries have used under 5 or so grand" market. IF I was going to do legit diver things I'd be slapping on a P42 before any sub/seamaster/prospex; it's the most legit watch on the market.
Seiko's main selling point is that they make affordable diver's in the £400+ range which actually meet ISO 6425 DIVER'S 200m, which is no small feat. A lot of the Swiss brands don't actually specify whether they meet this standard, we just take it on trust that they do. If the P39 was specified as meeting ISO 6425 then I think this would have two benefits: 1
- it demonstrates that the watch is a legit profesional tool, and not just a re-badged BB58, which is something I've already seen voiced repeatedly and I think justifiably (not helped by the marketing).
2 - it taps into Seiko's higher-end market and creates something aspiriational for Monster/Samurai owners, and to people looking at spending £1k+ on a Seiko diver "oh you're spending a grand on that? Grow up, save up a bit more and the Pelagos is waiting for you".
I think they nailed it personally, looks like a great watch and if I had the spare money and I wanted a dive watch it's what I'd buy. I've though ever since they released the BB58 if they did a smaller Pelagos it would be a great watch.
Instead on my limited budget I ended up getting a Citizen Promaster NY0040, it's been great actually so I'd struggle to justify spending 20x more on the Tudor.
Great video, Adrian. Thanks for answering so many common questions, and for the honest approach you take to all your reviews. I absolutely love this release, and will be selling my BB58 to add it once I can actually get one.
That said, I do hate the 21mm lug width. Given this release and the sub now being at 21mm, I do think we'll see more. I hope that you'll consider adding 21mm NATO straps. I currently own every single color of the broad weave NATOs in 20mm and I am a little bummed that they work so well for the BB58 but they won't work for this.
I do play to add an IWC Mark XX or Spitfire though, and the 20mm NATOs will at least work great on that. Would love to see you review the Mark XX!
I love it! It’s like they addressed all the critiques we had on the BB58 in this watch.
It’s a super smart move for Tudor to essentially give the best alternative for folks who can’t get a Sub. More direct design parallels vs. a Seamaster and also the dimensions are quite attractive. I just don’t like watering down the tool-ness of the Pelagos brand/name, but this will be an incredible selling watch.
What watering down? It’s a great watch
I think the difference between 200m and 500m is negligible for 99.8% of people who buy/wear this watch. Also you could argue that in being titanium it is more tool-y than the original Pelagos. I get what you’re saying though but I think they were smart and relatively small changes to make this version.
This Pelagos 39 is really the Tudor version of the modern Submariner 2022 no date. It would be great to have the same side by side comparison, outdoors too.
Good job taking the actual measurements of these watches. Insightful.
I love this watch. And yet another knockout timepiece from Tudor.
The ceramic bezel and titanium set it apart from the Black Bay 58 range, and I am now absolutely convinced 39mm is the GOAT case size. I know you criticised the press shots, but oh my how good does it look by the pool or with a linen suit!?
I'm tempted to get one myself, but my last two purchases have been Tudors so not sure I can justify three in a row! Regardless, I am jealous of those who gets a hold of one of these beauties.
Great video as always Adrian.
I have watched a bunch of videos on this new watch and what every single reviewer misses is the fact that the Vintage tutor Subs sold from the 1960s until the 1990s were 39 mm! that's the whole point of this, they are embracing the heritage of the brand and the size that was always slightly different from the Rolex Submariner
? Classic Submariners were smaller too
The 6538, i.e. the Sean Connery James Bond watch was 38mm.
@@fenianlewis most were 1mm bigger than Tudor subs at 40mm
I knew you’re into watches Motormouth after watching so many of your car reviews and noticing your watches lol
It’s also an example of them embracing common sense. Case widths of 38-40mm make a lot of sense. Watches, as objects of interest really start to get u retesting as you step down from those larger sizes. There’s no denying it. A well designed watch around 39mm may not fit everyone perfectly, but it will fit a majority reasonably well. Consumers are also becoming, slowly more savvy with respect to fit and it’s not always enough to simply throw something giant and eye popping out there on the market. Hopefully it means the market itself is broadening in terms of who’s attracted to and interested in buying a mechanical watch.
If you look at vintage watches, the heritage, across all lines, up to the late sixties and early seventies, dive watches aside, a 36mm case was considered a jumbo size watch.
Rolex has always offered smaller watches within their line. They recently scaled the Explorer down from 39mm to 36mm - Tudor should offer their new Ranger in a 36 as well, traditionally field watches were quite small, 34-36mm, fit aside, they look right as objects of interest. I’m sure Tudor knows that, the interest - it might be there.
Great review as always!
I really like this new 39 Pelagos. I feel it’ll have greater acceptance due to its more common size. But missing the date is surely an issue.
Nice Video Adrian! I love the swirling coffee at timemark 10:16!
Nice review. I like the overall look of it. Cute the "Yet" plug for the B&J straps.
Great comparison, that's super light, gonna be too light for me. I would prefer the 42 size also, but looks wise it would win definitely with that red on the dial. In my view, the rubber band buckle should be a proper diving clasp like the bracelet (like oysterflex) and they should offer a two tone version.
the light weight is definitely something I'd be concerned about also. I kind of like a little weight to my watches.
Just a couple of thoughts after watching your great review. 1) People who say this dial is boring, or not as good looking as the BB58: If this is actually a dive watch, visibility is the key point here. If you are genuinely wearing this to dive, you need to be able to read the dial quickly and easily. That's why it's such a high contrast dial. 2) The lack of helium escape valve: No one needs one unless you are a saturation diver ie. someone who lives for extended periods in a chamber under the sea between dives. Helium does not enter the watch while diving, no matter the depth. It's a cool feature, but ultimately useless for the vast majority of actual divers, let alone desk divers who wear a dive watch. You can easily open the crown and perform the same function btw. 3) The water resistance. Look, 200m is so much more than anyone will actually use. So much more, BUT it's the exact same amount as the BB. The original Pelagos has 500m. This watch is basically in direct competition with the BB. The Sub and other watches like Seiko Prospex Lux go to 300m, again overkilll, but these are features of dive watches. I wonder if this is deliberate so that the new watch isn't in direct competition with the Sub? Does Rolex even need to worry about that? The Sub sells itself, and is already impossible to get. People who want one aren't exactly going "Well, I wanted the sub, but spec wise, this Tudor is the same so I got this one instead." Why not make this 300m water resistance so it can hang with the big boys? 4) Am I the only one that thinks the hands don't light up as well as the hour markers? In the lume shots, the hours look great, but the hands don't seem to glow.
Keep up the great work, Adrian!
You are without question the best watch account online... if I was asking one thing it would be to get your hands on more watches and share more. Your opinions are the ones I most enjoy and most respect due to your good sense of humour and independentness (is that a word?) Thank you mate
The 21mm lug width is baffling. They could have had one of the greatest strap monsters of all time!
I think it’s gives it better wrist presence, the bracelet and rubber strap is probably all you need for this puppy.
You can shove a 22 onto 21 lugs
Tudor expects some additional $ by selling straps on line 😉
@@drzaius844 And it will look and feel awful.
Seeing them side by side, the main thing that struck me was just how gorgeous the bracelet is on the 39, I love the 58 but the bracelet lets it down (imo)
I know this obviously wasn't a lume test, but I'd be interested to see how well the hands hold up compared to the markers because in the brief sections we saw, they seemed noticably dimmer.
Also, curious to see what this would look like with inverse colour - could be an absolute stunner (also, blue please). Great vid, can't wait to enjoy staring longingly at one through the local Tudor store window.
The BB58 faux rivets are a dealbreaker for me. I really wish that wasn't the case.
@@matthewdouglas2373 the ranger bracelet fits.
@adrian I’d like to see the lune compared between the two Pelogos’ as well. Which is brighter for longer?
@@scotty2hotty159 that’s a good tip I may have to ask my AD if they would be able to procure that. Sounds difficult to make happen though.
Actually managed to get on wait list for this watch, been waiting for a smaller pelagos ever since the first one came out👏
Always love your videos Adrian! Thank you!
Having owned the LHD, which is a relatively similar colourway, I thought I might be underwhelmed by the 39. However, in the flesh it is awesome. The bezel is incredible. The difference between unnatural and natural light is the difference between it being flat black and a completely faded grey. I can see this being Tudor's most popular model.
Gotta say I'm glad to see that the bezel is looking as matte as I originally thought it would be which is making me a very happy boy so let's see if my Pelagos is going to be getting a little brother😁 (21mm lug is irritating but oh well)
HE measured 21mm, its actually 20mm
@@PepRex Tudor is the source, not "people". Only Tudor knows it 100% and even posted on Insta that its 20mm
@@gamezoneifictation any source beside an Instagram comment? Because I have seen 21mm confirmed wayyy more and Tudor does not list the lug width on their website.
it is great to see that you actually put in all the work and checked the specs (unlike other youtubers who just bluntly repeat marketing material without any critical thinking) ... and it interesting to see that Tudor was not completely honest especially with the diameter dimension ... well done Adrian ✌️
Great review Adrian, thanks. The background music is killing me though :))
First of all, thank you for this detailed review…more of this please. I own the BB 58 and I believe that it is an extremely versatile watch... but in my opinion it has a weak point in everyday life with the aluminum bezel. So I went to the concessionaire and tried on the Pelagos 39...the watch is great. It's a fusion of my BB 58 and NoDate Sub... Tudor could have hit it big! Anyway, I'm on the waiting list...!
Agree on the alu bezel 100%, it’s my fear with mine. If scratching is an issue then a full grade 2 titanium watch probably isn’t going to work either. They scratch ridiculously easy and it’s very noticeable.
I think it’s the one thing stopping me from doing the swap, and I’d probably prefer this in full steel or G5 titanium for an every day wear.
Love the new Dimensions. I'll get it next year when it comes out in blue.
I have a bb58 and I really like the 39 - Tudor nailed it. To me it's a perfect modern diver in a reasonably sized package.
The only thing I'm not quite sold on, is the slight difference in the lume color of the indices and the handset. 8:13 It's particularly evident looking at the snowflake. Need to see it in person.
I have seen at least a half dozen reviews of the new Pelagos 39. You are the only one to point out the bezel is actually 40 vs 39. Visually, I thouht i was seeing that in some of the other comparison videos, but all touted the 39 dimensions. Well done for clarifying the bezel vs case size!
I think Tudor has a home run here. 39-40mm is the sweet spot. Case thickness has been slimmed down. Now, like everything else, good luck on getting your hands on one.
So true!
Personally, I love it. I own one. The second I saw it I had to have it. And quite honestly I’ve been wearing it more than my Pepsi. It just wears so easy. It’s like you said, it’s extremely versatile. It’s a fine balance of luxury, and adventure.
Great honest review. You're the first to show the bezel in sunlight and noticed that grey-ish effect. I think the watch is a home run for Tudor. As an aside, it was quite distracting seeing through your right earring hole with the bright window light in the background. Watch the video again and you'll see what I mean.
This is such an awesome review - Thank you for including the 42 Pelagos.
As much as I dislike 21mm lugs I love the lug width. The 5 digit sub is my favourite watch...this might be worth checking out. - Thank you Adrian
I really love this watch, and put my name down at 2 AD’s yesterday for it. I would much rather have a thinner watch over a super overbuilt watch, and the dimensions of this look amazingly spot on. The 21mm lug with will be annoying, and their marketing was incredibly bad for it, but I don’t care, I am super pumped. The one thing I wish they would have changed would be to keep the indexes cutting into the rehaut/chapter ring of the original
HE measured 21mm, its actually 20mm
@@gamezoneifictation Brent miller Jewelerys also measured 21mm, as well as a couple owners on WUS that I am aware of. Tudor’s Instagram initially posted that it was 20mm, but given the measurements from multiple sources I am going to say whoever their social media manager is was wrong
@@ajgross67 Tudor is the main source. Only Tudor itself can give 100% confirmation about it
Had the BB Pro ordered, went down to the AD, tried both and immediately changed my order to the 39mm Pelagos. The Pelagos does feel more 40 and just perfect for me.
Love the video! Very helpful! Thank you.
What a great review! Good to know about the sunburst dial being very (very!) subtle! It certainly doesn't look like in the press shots and it was one of my main gripes with the watch. Still not sure about the sunburst effect in the bezel though.
The perfect one watch collection, as the Submariner is for many. The sunburst elements add just enough to dress it up for smart casual, which I think is brilliant. If I didn’t have a Pelagos LHD already, I’d be picking one up. Thanks for a great comparo, Adrian.
I totally love the LHD, but it's too chunky for me. This 39 will do - I only wish they had left a roulette date like the LHD...
@@MasterSam85 I think eliminating the date was one way to minimize thickness, which is the biggest objection on the Pelagos. Personally, I’m ok with no date but this will be a turn off for many. To me, the configuration they’ve gone with keeps the focus on being a tool.
@@i.am.hodgie totally! The date adds a mm or two to this Kenissi made movement...
I sold my LHD a few years ago (purely to fund buying a home). This watch looks like I'm getting a Pelagos again!
I love the matte finish of the 42, if they made the 39 all matte it would’ve been the perfect watch. I’ve been begging for a slimmed down Pelagos for years but when you change the dna of the Pelagos and turn it into a 62mas it loses all its tool appeal. Somewhat disappointed but I will have to see it in the flesh
I had the same thought -- looks a lot like a titanium Seiko 62MAS. Which I love, so it's all good. Still, it's the BB58 for me.
Matt Sheen is my porn name
Wonderful video. Great comparison between them all. Awesome work.
Thanks, Adrian
The Tudor (and the vid!) we've all been waiting for... Thanks Adrian! 👏🏼
For me the 42mm Pelagos in blue was the obvious choice, as I enjoy the larger size and think over qualified specs are fun. However I have 7 3/4” wrists and I am larger. So I can see the appeal for those who are smaller and don’t power lift in their garage. Tudor is smart to make the Pelagos for all wrist sizes. Great review!
Exact same. I lift weights and train martial arts.
I've got the BB GMT @ 42mm and a BB 58 Navy @ 39mm.
Love the 58 for work with a suit, as it sits better with shirts and suits. But the GMT fits my out of work persona better.
The Pelagos' LHD is the watch I'd like to procure next.
Tudor are absolutely on it right now with their last few releases! The FXD, BB-Pro, Ranger and now this Pelagos 39 are all fantastic…
The BB58 is no longer the best Tudor has to offer IMO. Definitely considering selling mine to get a new 39mm Pelagos 👌
This is by far the best review I have seen so far about the pelagos 39mm . Very informative and objective even the the nato strap plug . Your are the best Adrian . Anyway, love the previous 42mm edition but this new pelagos 39 is a game changer love it’s aesthetics and everyday practicality. This is a genius release and will be big for the brand as far more people will be able to wear this watch
Thanks for the review Adrain. You killed this one. And it was entertaining to boot!
It’s nice, but the 42 Pelagos just offers so much more.
Oh my Mistake... I thought this video was about a No Date Submariner....👀
Yeah, except the Tudor looks better.
What a stunning watch this is! I saved up and bought my first watch being the BB58 39mm, it’s been on my wrist ever since and I am now obsessed with Tudor. Tried to have a look for the Pelagos 39 in some of my locals but they got 1/2 in and they where gone that’s same day…
Just my opinion-this is your best video since GS WB. Very informative and interesting.
I enjoyed this one even more than your other recent videos. Great review, and you've done Tudor a great service as I had also dismissed this watch in my mind due to the sunburst dial. Maybe I'll go and check one out once they'r win stock next year!
Fantastic review as always .
Thank you for your in-depth video! Fantastic stuff.
Totally love the 39, got one one order.
Cheers
Great comparison video. Huge help
Great video, my fave bit of the whole video is light shining through your piecing hole in your ear!
This is the way to do a watch review man. Well done mate absolutely nailed it 💯
Awesome comparison video! Now waiting for the date version 40mm pelagos... if that day ever comes.. 🙂
Great video, so glad the burst isn't too obvious! Now the wait for a blue version begins.
Amazing review!! Can’t wait to have one of these on my wrist.
Brilliant review mate. I also appreciate the independence you carry for your own brand!!
I saw one through a shop window today. Best looking Tudor I've ever seen.
Excellent video; informative well presented and pleasant to watch!
The most honest reviews out there, fantastic content and why your channel has grown the way it has. Love the look of this watch and reminds me of earlier submariners. Tudor are definitely catering for a market that Rolex has vacated years ago and I applaud them for it 👍