Perspective for Beginners: 5 Point Perspective

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6

  • @emarpiee
    @emarpiee 2 місяці тому

    I really enjoyed your perspective videos. You explain things clearly and simply, but you also cover all the important points. I'm excited to watch your upcoming art fundamentals videos. Will you be covering color theory and other related topics soon, or will you focus on drawing fundamentals for now?

    • @tylerbourneart
      @tylerbourneart  2 місяці тому

      Thanks so much! Yes I'll try to get to some color theory pretty soon!

  • @Houdini_Bob
    @Houdini_Bob 2 місяці тому

    your name is Tyler and mine is . . . wait a minute, you forgot my name? gee whiz
    I have only heard it called fisheye while watching perspective tutorials and even then it was only glossed over and never really explained. thank you for the great explanation and examples for 5 point. you are quite the concept artist, dropping down those buildings during the example, nicely done.

    • @tylerbourneart
      @tylerbourneart  2 місяці тому +1

      Thanks! Yeah the term fisheye is typically used for camera lenses, I'd say, but hey I figure it's all basically the same thing

  • @danielsim8385
    @danielsim8385 2 місяці тому

    Tell us all the facts and then when you learn enough you get slapped with the "oh those are all lies". Of course. If we start adding more perspective points, would our image start to look more like a kaleidoscope of an image? Or just wouldn't work? I'm picturing something like Inception meets Dr Strange's mirror dimension

    • @tylerbourneart
      @tylerbourneart  2 місяці тому +3

      Funny you mention that! The next (and last) video in the series is how perspective is a lie lol. Once you get past 5 it's all personal interpretation, imo; but the most common uses, I'd say, are overlapping grids like in panoramic shots, and you see that kind of stuff in 360-degree video stuff in VR, the flat images are full of crazy perspective. And then yeah I guess you could have infinite amounts of auxiliary vanishing points, if you're doing Dr. Strange-level complexity