A 17 year old girl from a happy first world household, with two undivorced parents, classical theatre training, and global fame, is telling me that I stole her childhood because i'm not prepared to turn reality itself upside down to fight climate change. HOW DARE YOU!
It's hillaious how She sued Argentina, where there's no industry because we're poor and have like a million taxes, so nobody can make a factory; yet at the same time there's not a single mention about China and India...
rubén Galván Ikr. Just wait around the new Prime Minister of India is right wing so it's time for George Soros to be concerned about pollution in India lol.
Oh, she does lecture India alright. A nation of 1.5 billion people which is not exactly rich yet is still trying its best to keep pollution levels down, gets lectured by this brat. India has one of the lowest per capita emission figures by the way
Rich kid in Sweden: bro politicians in Nordic countries stole my childhood away by not implementing solar power at 99% Poor kids who have left Venezuela by foot: yeah bro it is what it is. Poor rich white girl
“Teens swear off having kids.” Imagine being pressured by your parents saying “ok, you can’t have kids unless our agenda is passed. It doesn’t matter your personal dreams, the world is ending!” Remember when parents pressured you into giving them grandkids?
Yeah, it is pretty messed up. The proper response is always, to just guide your children and help them figure it out for themselves. Family is a big choice, and making the right choice is important. While I personally think it is a choice more people would be happy with than not, it is evil to shame someone for wanting to have a family of their own, especially as a parent, it comes off as innately hypocritical.
I might as well ask. Since you're 16, do you consider yourself a teenager and want to be treated as one, or would you be fine with everyone referring you as a "kid" or a "child", and using that label as a way to shield you from detraction?
Ah you see, some people have the answer ready for that argument. It's just that unlike you, Greta is a genius kid (who gave no proposals and said nothing of value) and an outstanding orator (who read from paper, looking at it after every two phrases).
Every time I see a teenager admit they "don't know", I feel compelled to tell them they are likely far more intelligent than their peers. Keep your head; don't let authoritarians take it.
With that kind of thinking, I'm sure you'll get there eventually. I was where you were 9 years ago and I still think I have a ways to go. That kind of curiosity is needed to have an 'understanding' as the situation is constantly changing.
Recognizing a problem is the first step: you can stop there and complain about it or start working towards changing things. I see Greta as an instrumentalized complainer: she may raise awareness, but I'm afraid won't change anything. Geniuses see problems as opportunities to innovate, for pointing at a leaking pipe and screaming will never be as effective as grabbing the tools and repairing it.
No, no they don't. I've come across more than one person who was completely unaware of the satirical nature of A Modest Proposal and described it as though it were a cannibalism-manual by an out-of-touch aristocrat. I doubt they'd read it though; those people are probably just repeating other people's mischaracterisations.
holy shit how, when we studied it it was explicily said to us it's satire. And it's a leftist institution. I honestly can't believe that's the case it's so ridiculous.
@@AliRadicali My "holy crap" moment was when I heard that "The Prince" was written togue-in-cheek. I think I need to re-read that one when I get a chance.
I feel like you have a limited view of what the right was like 20 years ago. There are a lot of factors for this, the nature of the MSM, how ubiquitous the internet is today vs back then, and how most conservatives would rather keep their opinions to themselves than preach to the world. In that environment you only hear the loudest screechers.
Thank you. Like everyone there are crazies from both sides and the right's were vocal about "video games" and the like, but notice nothing political ever happened shy of a rating system. the majority of the right has always tried to be about limited government while socially holding in the reins of progress until certain we're not progressing off of a cliff. The corruption of power usually leads to things like the cronism that 'Republican' lawmakers have fallen into. This is why they get labeled as RINOs, but it's hard to unseat an incumbent. As for the left being the party of anti racism, pushing for fair treatment under the law and the right being against that - that's pure media lies, the left has always pushed for hand outs to the poor inner-city, because in the words of LBJ "it'll keep those n****s voting Democrat for the next 100 years", please tell me again how thinking people are capable enough to not need government assistance purely based on the color of you skin is racist?
I remember when I was in high-school and the left started this climate change hysteria. Back then, the left was saying that someone leaving on a reading lamp when they went to the bathroom was killing the planet, while they drove around in 4x4s and drank imported Perrier water. They "needed" those things. Nowadays, things are completely the same, but it's the latest iPhone and imported coffees instead of 4x4s and imported water. How did it end? With a few useless initiatives that didn't go anywhere like a push for cars to use LPG. (Environmentalists didn't use LPG, they need 4x4s because their drive has gravel on it), while "environmentally friendly" and "fair trade" became advertising buzzwords.
@@613harbinger316 Liquid Petroleum Gas. It was supposed to be some environmentally friendly fuel. (Wikipedia says it's Propane) There was a big push to get petrol stations to have LPG pumps, and to get people to convert cars their cars over to LPG. I think some taxi drivers converted over, but it never really took off and didn't stick around. I don't see LPG pumps any more (though I don't go looking for them).
@Overwhelmingly In the UK, this push for LPG only started around the year 2000 or so, and was dead by the end of the decade. If it is just propane, I wonder why they left suddenly latched onto it as some kind of wonder fuel.
A reminder that luxury cruise ships and private jets are some of the worst pollutant sources in the world. So shame on you, Joe Schmoe, for driving to work.
The judge got to realize that kv side falsify most of the evidence and as falsify evidence they add to "ignore it and dismiss it", so even if the thing vic wanted was to prouve that they where false accusations the fact that he is the one sueing for defamation... To explain what was explain if kv was the one suing vic in court their false accusations would Ave dismiss the case but due to them be the defense on the accusations of vic for is defamation, the only thing that was bs that happened is the judge say that proof of false accusations are not proof of defamation, so vic still Ave to provide evidence that he was affected by the false accusations.
@@heliosspecialistarrogant7031 I would hope it's not too hard. "Here's my job offers in December 2018. Here's the reviews of Broly. Here's my job offers after KV began, and here's me getting let go by Fumigation, basically the largest source of voice acting work I've been involved with for a decade." I guess the issue is proving monetary damages and linking them directly.
@@shortafroman4 my guess is the judge is scare that kv go against him and try to ruin is life, so the Judge try to reduce and dismiss everything to the point that vic look like he is the bad guy because he try to protect is self against false accusations. Just my guess...
The Carbon Engineering Company, Elon Musk, and the Uranium atom have done more for solving man-made emissions in the last ten years, than any climate activist has done in the past fifty. Edit: Yes, Dev. Canada *currently* has the highest producing Uranium mine and refinery. Canada will be annexed by the U.S. like in Fallout, it's just a matter of time.
I’m not sure Musk has done much, since a lot of electricity used by electric vehicles is generated with carbon emissions. Replace Musk with natural gas and you’re right.
@@andyrichter2714 I put Musk on the list because he's made the concept of owning an electric car far more appealing, and by extension, more popular. You see a lot more Teslas on the road now. This is a net positive for emissions. For example, I live in Houston. We get our electricity from a Nuclear power plant, which is emission-free. I see hundreds, if not thousands of new Tesla Model 3's on the road now. That's, hundreds, if not thousands of emission-free cars driving down the road that used to be gas-guzzlers. I say that is a far more productive achievement than Natural gas, especially in the Oil Capital of the country.
I don't think you understand the impact of gas, specifically cheap gas which we produce in abundance. It emits about half as much CO2 as coal. While consumption destruction has had an impact a big part of the decrease in US emissions has been gas. And unlike nuclear we can export it to developing nations where emissions are increasing. Which causes me no end of amusement because it may be that the most effective green technology of this century is the fracking all the Greens protest against.
I remember the early 80s, where the Soviet Union and a Cold War still existed, everyone trying to go about their lives and trying to not antagonize their kid’s development with adult worries about Mutually Assured Destruction. It wasn’t that there wasn’t moral panic waiting on the wings, but most people had no time for it. Things were good, man.
"Have we become this arrogant?" We have a spoiled Swedish teenage girl yelling and shaming politicians and people at large. Yes, "we" have become this arrogant.
Look, this is our generations existential threat. Our parents and grandparents had the atom bomb. We have the Changing Climate. I don't know about you guys, but my president took power away from the people in charge of securing the Amazon. He legalized more than 300 poisons and pesticides for our crops this year, I think actions should speak louder than words. So, let the kid speak. I think the politicians deserve to be humiliated.
@@alexandredesouza3692 no, let the people from your country speak for you, not some random swedish girl from across the oceans, in fact one of you guys should be speaking there about your problems instead of her, because to have others speak for you is to only silence you guys further, because in reality they do not know what they speak. Get the right people, in fact, one of your own, to speak in behalf of you, not some child
@@WHOARETHEPATRIOTS475 Just cause she's not Brazilian doesn't mean I should disagree with her completely. Also, unfortunately, Brazilians don't exactly have much of a culture of successfully speaking out against injustice. We've just learned to accept it.
@thunder key I'm sorry, I guess... 😅 By coincidence, I recently discovered some more downer news about Brazilian Environmental Activism (ask me if your curious). Also, one Health Minister got fired and his successor quit in the last month.
Anyone remembers the Catholic kid preaching live on TV and when he was asked to explain the Bible he had no idea what the Bible said? Yeah same situation with Greta
The MO of the left. Take science that hasn't properly or fully explored bring to the forefront in the most annoying way possible so everyone can hate it. It's like the reverse psychology of hate groups.
It's unfortunate, especially if one considers that in accordance to the pareto principle there are a handful of exceptionally polluting companies. 100 of them being responsible for 70% of the greenhouse gases, if i recall correctly. The most intuitive solution would be to scrutinize them.
Climate was never constant. The Earth temperature was never constant. CO2 levels were never constant. Vikings had farms in Greenland 1000 years ago, meaning it was much warmer at that time.
I have a classmate who talked about climate change in our school, referencing Greta even, and he sounds 100% more legit than Greta, meaning that Greta's speech felt forced and with seemingly fake emotions compared to my classmate that spoke on stage that day
It's odd to see christians be outright demonized I don't like religion and I don't like Christianity but those who believe in it shouldn't be outright demonized for no reason if someone is being a vile or a hypocrite and being like the voices of the 90s then sure they should be mocked but not normal people no matter their creed or religion
Aydin Paladin had a similar experience with this and the.... “issue the National Socialists had with Gems:” I believe it was in a video dealing with “The Gemish Question.” But regardless, she suggested that the numbers might have been exaggerated, due to the destruction wrought by both the Germans and their enemies on the camps where these records were contained. And because she *dared* suggest it was anything below one gajillion billion Gems baked into Gem Soap, youtubers on the left slapped her with the “Denier” label. Slightly unrelated, but alt-righters at the time were accusing her of being a coal burner when she said she found African _female_ faces attractive. People are dicks, regardless of alignment, it seems...
Well, when i was 16 i was researching Yellowstone, the possibility of a meteor dropping down on the planet and the collective yield of the world's nuclear stockpile. Safe to say that today, a few years down the line, i realize what a fucking nightmare it'd be for my development if i got put on stage, handed a mic and told to spout my BS to the entire fucking world. So yeah, the only emotion i have for Greta is pity. Whatever happens in the future, the odds of her having a happy, positive life seem rather low to me - and she has little to no control over that.
Funny thing is we had warmer weather about 400 years back to the point the best wine was from Scotland it was like 5 to 10 degrees (depending on what scientist you follow) but no one will talk about it
Yeah: everyone always talks about drowning cities and global disaster, but every change is ripe with possibility. Especially if it's unavoidable, starting to debate not about how to stop it but about how to adapt to this change may be the way: a truly fresh perspective I had never considered before 🤔
Hey otaku, i have done a fair bit of research on the matter from the scientific side. i was interested in what you had to say at the beginning with possible increase to trade routes through the north of Canada and the like and that is an interesting idea. the real danger that will come from the increased temps is that there will be stronger droughts, more hurricanes and more fires. the oceans are also effected by co2 the become slightly acidfied which is part of the damage to the coral reefs. Although the biggest damage for coral reefs does tend to actually come from run off and garbage especially here in aus on the great barrier reef. I also agree on the fact that one of our best options right now is utilising our current power structure to generate much more efficient green energy solutions if we switched entirely now it wouldn't work yet. Nuclear is a very good option but many people kind of have a bias towards because of all the negative ideas that have floated around about it for so many years. You asked if there is currently anything we could do and yes there is. we would need to start reducing our out put of c02 while planting tree and when they reach carbon neutral you cut hem down and replant them so they become carbon sinks you could use the wood for paper, packaging and construction. the other solutions are a bit out of our technological reach right now like better green energy supply and green electric cars. Electric cars as they are now have large carbon footprints to create making them rather carbon neutral compared to a gas efficient car over 10 years. All in all it is kinda a hard subject and there does need to be care taken with it. people do get kinda weird about it but if i could recommend a channel which talks about climate change in a mostly scientific way and tries to shows some solutions we have today i would recommend potholer 54. The evidence for climate change we have right now its conclusive that its humans at this point but like you said what do we do about it euthanize every one thats not exactly an option, but once we get past the carbon energy phase maybe it wont be our only "solution". The 10 year thing is absolute bullshit even if we did for 100 years humans probably wouldn't die and we might actually cause another glaciation event and again humans probably would be fine in a glaciation because we adapt pretty good. this would take another 200-300 years for the glacial period to fully begin because its a slow process. either way no matter what we cant really over heat the earth, we can create whats called a hot box earth which was what the was at during the cretaceous which had average temp of 30 degrees which is 15 degrees hotter than today so you can imagine pretty shit. Tldr.Sorry for all that. the 10 year thing is bullshit even scientifically. there is some serious effect even from just atmospheric climate change such as droughts, more frequent hurricane and cyclones and ,stronger more frequent wild fires. Atmospheric CO2 does actually effect oceans and whats in them by acidification. We can reverse climate change if we had the technology. do check out potholer 54 his stuff on climate change is pretty good.
When you step from "everthing is up to question and further experimentation as technology and knowledge evolves" to "our knowledge is absolute, unquestionable and your a heretic for daring to raise a skeptical eyebrow" you step from science into dogma
Honestly, I think this is why Thanos was such a compelling character. There's a little part inside all of us that secretly thinks: if I had the gauntlet I could do it better. Unfortunately, the ecofascists have let that little part sit in the driver's seat.
@@613harbinger316 You should watch these videos ua-cam.com/video/HXBjVau1w7Y/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/HXBjVau1w7Y/v-deo.html&t=9s ua-cam.com/video/vR6-c3j0K_Y/v-deo.html
"Climate catholic" and "climate confessions", guess that makes me a climate apostate for supporting nuclear energy or suggesting we invoke a techno-caste system.
Jesus, "Techno-caste"? I think I was going too far with wanting only a select few people who understand tech to have it. That was a downright oppressive idea. I disavow that.
What nobody hits at are the biggest polluters: Production and construction. Energy production, car production, solar panel production, and really anything else you can think of. An average cheap car running at 26 miles per gallon, driven the average amount an American drives every year (which is a lot, by the way) will take at least 8 years to output as much CO2 from its exhaust pipe as it took to build the damn thing. And, yes, that is per-car. Keep in mind that more expensive cars tend to use more exotic materials, so the CO2 cost of making a car tends to scale-up with its price to some degree. Also keep in mind, I don't know how lifespan is on an electric car these days, but I know they've had serious problems with longevity in the past. I'm sure they're past most of it, and I hear there are lithium-ion battery designs now that will theoretically outlive the machines they're used in, but this is all stuff to consider. And, when you realize how low tailpipe emissions are on the food chain, it really makes you wonder why there's been such a push for electric cars... Oh right, because they look like they're saving the environment, and we're dealing with the types of people whose favorite pass-time is virtue-signaling.
Greta was clearly ill-prepared-the two opposing clips of her prove that. It might just be me but, when you put a child in an adult arena, it should be expected that they be challenged. After all, if they're there, then you think they can clearly take it, right? Right?
I heard a solution to the death of plankton would be seeding areas with Iron dust, to feed the organisms that eat the CO2. Those organisms would also be fish food, which could help against overfishing.
I can just barely remember when things were like that. I was born and became politically active right as things were changing, and now I’m a lockean liberal arguing with communists at college.
The thing about our planet and temp increased is that the warming and cooling happens mostly at the poles while the equator stays relatively constant. So it wouldn’t get any worse to live there, only better in the northern climates
The Right's position on climate change isn't an "ostrich with its head in the sand". In fact, the Right doesn't have a unified opinion on climate change. Most people on the Conservative Right tend to think of climate change in one of two ways: 1) it is heavily overblown and doesn't pose an existential treat to the Earth, or 2) it is a plot by the government to suppress constitutional liberties. The Libertarian Right sometimes thinks it exists, but they insist that free-market capitalism can solve the issue. The Nationalist Right usually admits that it exists, and they take great pains to rectify it through government action, since they believe in protecting a nation's natural landscape. A rightist's response to climate change depends on his position _within_ the right side of the political spectrum. Also, there is a difference between environmentalism and conservationism.
Having grown up in a member country of NATO during the Cold War in the 70s and 80s, living in cities that were nuclear targets hearing these clowns say I have no idea how it feels to expect the world to end makes me laugh.
I remember being in university and hanging out with pot smoking, PC feminists. They seemed radical and different to this country boy. Turns out the shine wears off quickly. If she survives people, Greta will need her parent's money to get through therapy. Lucky for her she's shielded from reality enough to afford years of it.
Man, if only there was some magic ore that could produce copious amounts of energy with close to zero carbon dioxide emissions and only minimal amounts of permanent waste compared to what fosil fuels produce. How unfortunate that we live in a world where there is no such perfect energy supply, guess we'll just keep relying on coal.
Its also funny when people complain about the potential safety risks of magic but then completely write off the safety risks of all the green energies. Such as all the mechanics and such who die working on windmills.
Of all the countries that really should be reducing their carbon emissions, is also the 2 countries that have the largest population: China, and India. But that’s racist, to even consider that.
@@abrunosON Not like I go searching on it on the daily or something. Sometimes specific sites that are well-trusted are best to show some things like that. Many places can claim something is legit.
"Haha wouldn't it be funny if all of America lived in pods and ate ze bug and owned nothing and was totally not forced to be happy to definitely help the environment? While i totally do not sit in my ivory mega mansion sipping the oldest bourbon, zat would be hilarious." - Klaus Schwab
Is it detrimental? Idk dude, I'm pretty sure the science is settled on this too. Yes, there are some benefits, but you know it would cost a bit to move *billions* of people and the cities from close to the equator to Sibiria.
I kinda don't. I wish I could debate myself back then. I jumped for joy when Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize, but looking back, I never had any policy on my mind at all. I wanna jump to that moment and ask myself "Why?" I don't think I would have said anything except for "He's the first black president" without any irony. I rooted for Hillary only because she was female, literally no other reason, in the slightest. And I somehow laughed at the "jokes" john oliver would say. It's just disturbing
I know right, now it's Fox News that the reasonable (although not all the time) and MSNBC, BBC and the rest of them of the liberal media are now the crazies.
@@vanilla8956 You're probable right I don't watch a lot of mainstream news anyway. Apart from sky news Australia which I do watch sometimes just as reasonable.
@@vanilla8956 I remember the days leading up to the election of Obama when I asked a friend why she wanted to vote for him. She said, "Because I want to be able to say that I voted for the first black president." When I pointed out that she was deciding who to vote for based on skin color, she just gave me this confused look. I still shake my head thinking about it.
Cold is not the only barrier to growth in northerly regions, sunlight is often overlooked in debates regarding climate change. For example, we can already see parts of the Carolinian zone in southern Canada starting to spread north in Ontario, but many of these plants die out at a certain point because the annual sunlight is insufficient to sustain them. Infer from this what you will, but it's another factor we may need to adapt to moving forward.
Soils are different, too. You can't compare boreal forest soils to great plains soils. The other problem with people saying that warming will be a good thing is that they aren't paying attention to rainfall patterns and extreme weather events, particularly hail. Climate instability is a really bad thing from a farming point of view. The kind of farming we do right now is predicated on a whole bunch of factors. With farming's low profit margins things have to be pretty finely tuned to work.
Its a shame that the greenhouse effect of water vapour makes CO2 look like a fart in a hurricane in comparison, but you cant sell water vapour credits to industry so *crickets*.
On climate change: 1. The icecaps usually melt completely between ice ages regardless of humans. 2. The global atmospheric level of CO2 before the industrial revolution was decreasing and nearly low enough that plant life would have died and life on Earth ended. 3. Since we have sent up satalites an effect called the "greening of Earth" has occurred, observable from space. In effect the amount of plants and plant growth on Earth has drastically increased.
i doubt a lack of co2 wouldve "killed the planet" but yes co2 is plant food its probably the best thing we can do is put as much of it into the air as possible
@@badradish2116 plants begin having serious growth difficulty at around 80 ppm and dying at 70 ppm or less. The global average in 1700 was like 100 ppm and trending down.
IMO "Is it Man made?" is the wrong question, since as you say, it's without a doubt that the billions of us alive are affecting some effect. The better one IMO is "To what degree are we responsible?" The climate is complex, multivariate, and has observable cyclical patterns, and it's not impossible that we're being made to take responsibility for one of them. If true, that that would be the height of human hubris, and hamartia awaits.
Us in Ireland just despise Eco-Fascism, mainly due to the fact our country has been using more reusable energy way before it was cool or claimed by Eco Fascists
i remember when in 2000 they said europe would be flooded by 2020. i guess we'll see if that comes true in another 20 years. and another 20. and another. and another. and another. it's coming bro, trust me
The science wasn't new 20 years ago. The theory of CO2 and climate is over 100 years old. Conservatives weren't always opposed to addressing the issue either. Margaret Thatcher talked about it in the 80s.
Can't we just take these ecofascists down for good and use them as fertilizers? it's a win win, they help the enviroment and they finally stop annoying everyone else
It is important to note that more water vapor exists as a green house gas than carbon monoxide, and the only thing that controls that is the sun and weather. Being on a rock flying around a giant light bulb leads to random changes in temp at times
I’m sorry but I don’t recall the liberals being sane when I was growing up in the 80s and 90s. I actually recall the Democrats as the ones holding hearings on violence and in video games. Joe Liberman, Tipper Gore (wife of Al Gore) are two that come to mind and I don’t remember them as being for individual liberty. Maybe my memory is faulty but politics makes strange bedfellows as my grandparents used to say.
SFO, you should check out a Channel called Tony Heller, I don't remember how I bumped into his channel but the truth of environmental science has been eye opening! The amount of purposely altering data is ridiculous
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD First time I've heard about it and just looked into it, interesting that the debate is still ongoing, still it's good that discussion is occurring plus if there is anything to take away from Tony Heller's videos, it is the point that there are organisations that are purposely changing data for their own ends
the population issue has two potential solutions, but one that keeps the Current Powers in Control, the Good solution is to double down on Space travel, and work out how to make other planets habitable for human life, and space travel to said planets possible and practical for the average person, the other "Solution" the one that doesn't involve potentially releasing people from the sphere of influence, is Deliberate depopulation.
This is fucking gold. Man, thank you for this video, the whole eco thing is kind of fucking with my mind and i really neded someone to clearify all the fluff thats surrounding ecofaschists
I will never let go of my rule; once you bring a child into it, you lost me and your message. That doesn't mean I will deny climate change or justice just because someone brought their kid at a protest. But I am saying that if you endanger a kid at a protest or force a kid to be a public figure, you will lost my respect and I won't see you as a reliable person.
They picked a teen to rant over a topic so they could gather more support from more teens so those teens in question could rant just as Greta did. Very clever left, very clever.
A 17 year old girl from a happy first world household, with two undivorced parents, classical theatre training, and global fame, is telling me that I stole her childhood because i'm not prepared to turn reality itself upside down to fight climate change.
HOW DARE YOU!
It's hillaious how She sued Argentina, where there's no industry because we're poor and have like a million taxes, so nobody can make a factory; yet at the same time there's not a single mention about China and India...
rubén Galván Ikr. Just wait around the new Prime Minister of India is right wing so it's time for George Soros to be concerned about pollution in India lol.
congratulations, you've figured out the scam.
Oh, she does lecture India alright. A nation of 1.5 billion people which is not exactly rich yet is still trying its best to keep pollution levels down, gets lectured by this brat. India has one of the lowest per capita emission figures by the way
@@thetechnocrat4979 And the other, china has more then almost the rest of the world counting the plastics they put into the waters.
@@HiddenOcelot
Yeah, agreed.
Watch her getting rich in a few years by selling a book where she cries about her stolen childhood.
Sadly she's really rich already because her parents
Rich kid in Sweden: bro politicians in Nordic countries stole my childhood away by not implementing solar power at 99%
Poor kids who have left Venezuela by foot: yeah bro it is what it is. Poor rich white girl
And buys a house on the beach, like other climate activists.
her parents have 2 companies based on climate change.
@@luisacosta54 yeah one of her parents make more in one year than my parents will make in their lifetime
“Teens swear off having kids.” Imagine being pressured by your parents saying “ok, you can’t have kids unless our agenda is passed. It doesn’t matter your personal dreams, the world is ending!” Remember when parents pressured you into giving them grandkids?
I find that people who are willing to do that are people who I don't want to have kids anyway. Seems like Darwin helping us out.
Yeah, it is pretty messed up. The proper response is always, to just guide your children and help them figure it out for themselves. Family is a big choice, and making the right choice is important. While I personally think it is a choice more people would be happy with than not, it is evil to shame someone for wanting to have a family of their own, especially as a parent, it comes off as innately hypocritical.
Just means less competition for my future kids, lmbao
@@marvelousdex9678 Only the well off ones do that, and for everyone one of them there's thousands who can't.
Having kids is not a rational decision anyway , it's something we do out of various reasons but none is rational.
I'm Greta's age. I would like to think I have a complex understanding of how the world works and how to fix things. I really don't.
I might as well ask. Since you're 16, do you consider yourself a teenager and want to be treated as one, or would you be fine with everyone referring you as a "kid" or a "child", and using that label as a way to shield you from detraction?
Ah you see, some people have the answer ready for that argument. It's just that unlike you, Greta is a genius kid (who gave no proposals and said nothing of value) and an outstanding orator (who read from paper, looking at it after every two phrases).
Every time I see a teenager admit they "don't know", I feel compelled to tell them they are likely far more intelligent than their peers.
Keep your head; don't let authoritarians take it.
With that kind of thinking, I'm sure you'll get there eventually. I was where you were 9 years ago and I still think I have a ways to go. That kind of curiosity is needed to have an 'understanding' as the situation is constantly changing.
Recognizing a problem is the first step: you can stop there and complain about it or start working towards changing things. I see Greta as an instrumentalized complainer: she may raise awareness, but I'm afraid won't change anything.
Geniuses see problems as opportunities to innovate, for pointing at a leaking pipe and screaming will never be as effective as grabbing the tools and repairing it.
"Speak softly. For those who cannot hear an angry shout, may strain to hear a whisper."
"Ever notice that the whisper of temptation can be heard farther than the loudest call to duty?"
@@luisacosta54 That's deep. What's it from?
@@AdamDawson1984 Earl Wilson. He was good indeed.
@@luisacosta54 great quote!
"Climate change is about race"
What.... who in their right mind.....
Pyjamalama pure stupidity of the far left
Liberals, am I right?
No one. No one _in their right mind._
They're just trying to play all the shame cards so you do as they say. Soon it'll be sexist and homophobic
survival of the fittest
I feel sad for Greta
Her parents used her like a tool and the internet's using her "how dare you" heavily accented cry as a meme
Dont feel.
She got the chance to do things we cant even dream.
Private jet flights
Amazing boat
Gone to another country.
Etc
@@ninjabaiano6092You forgot about meeting Papa Soros and Papa Klaus.
@@ninjabaiano6092
Yap, she's a rich privileged white girl, there is zero reason to feel sympathetic.
They do know a "modest proposal" was a satirical essay and not a blueprint for why humans should eat human flesh.
Holy moly! Was it not a How-To manual, just like 1984 and Animal Farm? How did I not get the memo?
No, no they don't. I've come across more than one person who was completely unaware of the satirical nature of A Modest Proposal and described it as though it were a cannibalism-manual by an out-of-touch aristocrat. I doubt they'd read it though; those people are probably just repeating other people's mischaracterisations.
They weren't allowed to read it; white male author, probably racist.
holy shit how, when we studied it it was explicily said to us it's satire. And it's a leftist institution. I honestly can't believe that's the case it's so ridiculous.
@@AliRadicali My "holy crap" moment was when I heard that "The Prince" was written togue-in-cheek. I think I need to re-read that one when I get a chance.
I feel like you have a limited view of what the right was like 20 years ago.
There are a lot of factors for this, the nature of the MSM, how ubiquitous the internet is today vs back then, and how most conservatives would rather keep their opinions to themselves than preach to the world. In that environment you only hear the loudest screechers.
Thank you. Like everyone there are crazies from both sides and the right's were vocal about "video games" and the like, but notice nothing political ever happened shy of a rating system. the majority of the right has always tried to be about limited government while socially holding in the reins of progress until certain we're not progressing off of a cliff. The corruption of power usually leads to things like the cronism that 'Republican' lawmakers have fallen into. This is why they get labeled as RINOs, but it's hard to unseat an incumbent. As for the left being the party of anti racism, pushing for fair treatment under the law and the right being against that - that's pure media lies, the left has always pushed for hand outs to the poor inner-city, because in the words of LBJ "it'll keep those n****s voting Democrat for the next 100 years", please tell me again how thinking people are capable enough to not need government assistance purely based on the color of you skin is racist?
You call it ecofascism but it's actually the opposite (ecomarxism)
You filthy centrist what are you doing here
How does post irony guy have only 6 likes here holy shit
@@lankygit1942 gh
Very true
Fascism isn't the opposite of Marxism, not really.
I remember when I was in high-school and the left started this climate change hysteria.
Back then, the left was saying that someone leaving on a reading lamp when they went to the bathroom was killing the planet, while they drove around in 4x4s and drank imported Perrier water. They "needed" those things.
Nowadays, things are completely the same, but it's the latest iPhone and imported coffees instead of 4x4s and imported water.
How did it end? With a few useless initiatives that didn't go anywhere like a push for cars to use LPG. (Environmentalists didn't use LPG, they need 4x4s because their drive has gravel on it), while "environmentally friendly" and "fair trade" became advertising buzzwords.
What's LPG?
@@613harbinger316 Liquid Petroleum Gas. It was supposed to be some environmentally friendly fuel. (Wikipedia says it's Propane)
There was a big push to get petrol stations to have LPG pumps, and to get people to convert cars their cars over to LPG.
I think some taxi drivers converted over, but it never really took off and didn't stick around. I don't see LPG pumps any more (though I don't go looking for them).
@@SabreXT Ah, ok. Thanks for the info. I was thinking Liters Per Gallon? Leagues Per Gallon? Lol.
@Overwhelmingly In the UK, this push for LPG only started around the year 2000 or so, and was dead by the end of the decade.
If it is just propane, I wonder why they left suddenly latched onto it as some kind of wonder fuel.
A reminder that luxury cruise ships and private jets are some of the worst pollutant sources in the world.
So shame on you, Joe Schmoe, for driving to work.
I've just realised that Greta Thunberg's voice sounds like it belongs in Skyrim, as does her actual speech...
How dare you, dragonborn!
i used to be an activist like you...
Lmfao that lady who said climate change is about race!😂
Watermelon socialism: Green on the outside. Red on the inside.
@@Valmitic we wuz kangz
I don’t honestly understand how she could go on there and say those things. What a fucking momo
So i hate blacks, the lgbt community, etc... cuz i question stuff about their solutions to climate change...? Or am i nuts?
And Astrodynamics is about coffé, tea and cats for her. Cut3.
>No Captain Planet, Waterworld, Ferngully or Avatar references
SHAME!!!!
P.S.: How is the Vic Mignogna video going?
Well, I HAVE sent him *PLENTY* of Marzgurl/Kickvic fodder
I wonder if he could get on with Nick Rekieta to talk about it.
The judge got to realize that kv side falsify most of the evidence and as falsify evidence they add to "ignore it and dismiss it", so even if the thing vic wanted was to prouve that they where false accusations the fact that he is the one sueing for defamation... To explain what was explain if kv was the one suing vic in court their false accusations would Ave dismiss the case but due to them be the defense on the accusations of vic for is defamation, the only thing that was bs that happened is the judge say that proof of false accusations are not proof of defamation, so vic still Ave to provide evidence that he was affected by the false accusations.
@@heliosspecialistarrogant7031 I would hope it's not too hard.
"Here's my job offers in December 2018. Here's the reviews of Broly.
Here's my job offers after KV began, and here's me getting let go by Fumigation, basically the largest source of voice acting work I've been involved with for a decade."
I guess the issue is proving monetary damages and linking them directly.
@@shortafroman4 my guess is the judge is scare that kv go against him and try to ruin is life, so the Judge try to reduce and dismiss everything to the point that vic look like he is the bad guy because he try to protect is self against false accusations. Just my guess...
The Carbon Engineering Company, Elon Musk, and the Uranium atom have done more for solving man-made emissions in the last ten years, than any climate activist has done in the past fifty.
Edit: Yes, Dev. Canada *currently* has the highest producing Uranium mine and refinery. Canada will be annexed by the U.S. like in Fallout, it's just a matter of time.
I’m not sure Musk has done much, since a lot of electricity used by electric vehicles is generated with carbon emissions.
Replace Musk with natural gas and you’re right.
@@andyrichter2714 I put Musk on the list because he's made the concept of owning an electric car far more appealing, and by extension, more popular. You see a lot more Teslas on the road now. This is a net positive for emissions.
For example, I live in Houston. We get our electricity from a Nuclear power plant, which is emission-free. I see hundreds, if not thousands of new Tesla Model 3's on the road now. That's, hundreds, if not thousands of emission-free cars driving down the road that used to be gas-guzzlers. I say that is a far more productive achievement than Natural gas, especially in the Oil Capital of the country.
The Green New Deal is anti-nuclear
@@kx3z My point exactly. Nuclear power is emissions free. Climate activists are an active detriment to "going green".
I don't think you understand the impact of gas, specifically cheap gas which we produce in abundance. It emits about half as much CO2 as coal. While consumption destruction has had an impact a big part of the decrease in US emissions has been gas. And unlike nuclear we can export it to developing nations where emissions are increasing.
Which causes me no end of amusement because it may be that the most effective green technology of this century is the fracking all the Greens protest against.
I remember the early 80s, where the Soviet Union and a Cold War still existed, everyone trying to go about their lives and trying to not antagonize their kid’s development with adult worries about Mutually Assured Destruction. It wasn’t that there wasn’t moral panic waiting on the wings, but most people had no time for it. Things were good, man.
Don't forget the Killer Bees!
@Sour Puss good. Drugs can fuck you over. Its fantastic that those psas worked for the few.
@@Nitrodino7875 I think it has been established that kids exposed to the PSAs did not have lower rates of drug use than kids who hasn't.
Titanium Rain
The surge in drug use after the government stopped making PSAs says otherwise.
The satanic panic would like to have a word
"Have we become this arrogant?"
We have a spoiled Swedish teenage girl yelling and shaming politicians and people at large.
Yes, "we" have become this arrogant.
Look, this is our generations existential threat. Our parents and grandparents had the atom bomb. We have the Changing Climate.
I don't know about you guys, but my president took power away from the people in charge of securing the Amazon. He legalized more than 300 poisons and pesticides for our crops this year, I think actions should speak louder than words.
So, let the kid speak. I think the politicians deserve to be humiliated.
@@alexandredesouza3692 no, let the people from your country speak for you, not some random swedish girl from across the oceans, in fact one of you guys should be speaking there about your problems instead of her, because to have others speak for you is to only silence you guys further, because in reality they do not know what they speak. Get the right people, in fact, one of your own, to speak in behalf of you, not some child
@@WHOARETHEPATRIOTS475 Just cause she's not Brazilian doesn't mean I should disagree with her completely.
Also, unfortunately, Brazilians don't exactly have much of a culture of successfully speaking out against injustice. We've just learned to accept it.
@thunder key I'm sorry, I guess... 😅
By coincidence, I recently discovered some more downer news about Brazilian Environmental Activism (ask me if your curious). Also, one Health Minister got fired and his successor quit in the last month.
@@alexandredesouza3692 People are starving while dimwits like you talk about trees
Unbelievable
Anyone remembers the Catholic kid preaching live on TV and when he was asked to explain the Bible he had no idea what the Bible said?
Yeah same situation with Greta
He was doing pretty well, because 99% of religious folk have not read the bible.
@@aldiascholarofthefirstsin1051depressingly accurate
He was a Protestant, he was using the King James Bible
This hysteria is actually discrediting the actual science. It's insane.
The MO of the left. Take science that hasn't properly or fully explored bring to the forefront in the most annoying way possible so everyone can hate it. It's like the reverse psychology of hate groups.
Science has been bought by the left using our money.
It's unfortunate, especially if one considers that in accordance to the pareto principle there are a handful of exceptionally polluting companies. 100 of them being responsible for 70% of the greenhouse gases, if i recall correctly.
The most intuitive solution would be to scrutinize them.
As an environmental science student, I can agree Q
100%.
FINALLY someone else said it
Climate was never constant. The Earth temperature was never constant. CO2 levels were never constant. Vikings had farms in Greenland 1000 years ago, meaning it was much warmer at that time.
Thorium reactors are much more reliable than solar and wind power.
Are you telling me they work at night or when it's calm? Heresy! Aha
Nuclear and hydroelectric are, perhaps, the most environmentally friendly power sources.
*Nuclear energy rules, solar energy drools!*
Nuclear is the future
better for the env than wind too
I have a classmate who talked about climate change in our school, referencing Greta even, and he sounds 100% more legit than Greta, meaning that Greta's speech felt forced and with seemingly fake emotions compared to my classmate that spoke on stage that day
Now we Christians ARE the video games, rock and roll, D&D and South Park. What a time to be alive.
It's odd to see christians be outright demonized I don't like religion and I don't like Christianity but those who believe in it shouldn't be outright demonized for no reason if someone is being a vile or a hypocrite and being like the voices of the 90s then sure they should be mocked but not normal people no matter their creed or religion
@@TetsuRiken wait what was I even talking about 💀💀
i have no clue what the context for either of these are
@@KaptainKommissar moral panics and crusades though idr what was in the video
Aydin Paladin had a similar experience with this and the.... “issue the National Socialists had with Gems:” I believe it was in a video dealing with “The Gemish Question.” But regardless, she suggested that the numbers might have been exaggerated, due to the destruction wrought by both the Germans and their enemies on the camps where these records were contained. And because she *dared* suggest it was anything below one gajillion billion Gems baked into Gem Soap, youtubers on the left slapped her with the “Denier” label.
Slightly unrelated, but alt-righters at the time were accusing her of being a coal burner when she said she found African _female_ faces attractive. People are dicks, regardless of alignment, it seems...
Gems? Is that a euphemism lol.
Well, when i was 16 i was researching Yellowstone, the possibility of a meteor dropping down on the planet and the collective yield of the world's nuclear stockpile. Safe to say that today, a few years down the line, i realize what a fucking nightmare it'd be for my development if i got put on stage, handed a mic and told to spout my BS to the entire fucking world.
So yeah, the only emotion i have for Greta is pity. Whatever happens in the future, the odds of her having a happy, positive life seem rather low to me - and she has little to no control over that.
I wasn't a savior of humanity and yet I suffer crippling depression. Explain that atheists.
I've never looked at it from the perspective of climate change having some positive side effects, even though I'm Canadian. Interesting perspective!
Funny thing is we had warmer weather about 400 years back to the point the best wine was from Scotland it was like 5 to 10 degrees (depending on what scientist you follow) but no one will talk about it
This is a reminder post as UA-cam has been removing posts i make about the MWP (hope they don't get what this is)
Yeah: everyone always talks about drowning cities and global disaster, but every change is ripe with possibility.
Especially if it's unavoidable, starting to debate not about how to stop it but about how to adapt to this change may be the way: a truly fresh perspective I had never considered before 🤔
@@certanmike "Funny thing is we had warmer weather about 400 years back"
That's not true for a global average.
@@rejected4760
So what exactly is “truth” ?
Let me guess … “TRUTH” is whatever you say it is , am I right ?
Hey otaku, i have done a fair bit of research on the matter from the scientific side. i was interested in what you had to say at the beginning with possible increase to trade routes through the north of Canada and the like and that is an interesting idea. the real danger that will come from the increased temps is that there will be stronger droughts, more hurricanes and more fires. the oceans are also effected by co2 the become slightly acidfied which is part of the damage to the coral reefs. Although the biggest damage for coral reefs does tend to actually come from run off and garbage especially here in aus on the great barrier reef.
I also agree on the fact that one of our best options right now is utilising our current power structure to generate much more efficient green energy solutions if we switched entirely now it wouldn't work yet. Nuclear is a very good option but many people kind of have a bias towards because of all the negative ideas that have floated around about it for so many years.
You asked if there is currently anything we could do and yes there is. we would need to start reducing our out put of c02 while planting tree and when they reach carbon neutral you cut hem down and replant them so they become carbon sinks you could use the wood for paper, packaging and construction. the other solutions are a bit out of our technological reach right now like better green energy supply and green electric cars. Electric cars as they are now have large carbon footprints to create making them rather carbon neutral compared to a gas efficient car over 10 years.
All in all it is kinda a hard subject and there does need to be care taken with it. people do get kinda weird about it but if i could recommend a channel which talks about climate change in a mostly scientific way and tries to shows some solutions we have today i would recommend potholer 54. The evidence for climate change we have right now its conclusive that its humans at this point but like you said what do we do about it euthanize every one thats not exactly an option, but once we get past the carbon energy phase maybe it wont be our only "solution". The 10 year thing is absolute bullshit even if we did for 100 years humans probably wouldn't die and we might actually cause another glaciation event and again humans probably would be fine in a glaciation because we adapt pretty good. this would take another 200-300 years for the glacial period to fully begin because its a slow process. either way no matter what we cant really over heat the earth, we can create whats called a hot box earth which was what the was at during the cretaceous which had average temp of 30 degrees which is 15 degrees hotter than today so you can imagine pretty shit.
Tldr.Sorry for all that. the 10 year thing is bullshit even scientifically. there is some serious effect even from just atmospheric climate change such as droughts, more frequent hurricane and cyclones and ,stronger more frequent wild fires. Atmospheric CO2 does actually effect oceans and whats in them by acidification. We can reverse climate change if we had the technology. do check out potholer 54 his stuff on climate change is pretty good.
You ain't wrong about the hysteria negatively affecting today's youth. I've both seen and experienced it firsthand
When you step from "everthing is up to question and further experimentation as technology and knowledge evolves" to "our knowledge is absolute, unquestionable and your a heretic for daring to raise a skeptical eyebrow" you step from science into dogma
"Yarr, you be ruining me childhood." Best Meme haha
We need to make more memes comparing these people to Thanos because that's exactly what they sound like and really truly want.
Honestly, I think this is why Thanos was such a compelling character. There's a little part inside all of us that secretly thinks: if I had the gauntlet I could do it better. Unfortunately, the ecofascists have let that little part sit in the driver's seat.
@@613harbinger316 You should watch these videos ua-cam.com/video/HXBjVau1w7Y/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/HXBjVau1w7Y/v-deo.html&t=9s
ua-cam.com/video/vR6-c3j0K_Y/v-deo.html
No. Thanos is awesome. These people are not.
"Climate catholic" and "climate confessions", guess that makes me a climate apostate for supporting nuclear energy or suggesting we invoke a techno-caste system.
Jesus, "Techno-caste"? I think I was going too far with wanting only a select few people who understand tech to have it. That was a downright oppressive idea. I disavow that.
Thank you for reminding people that the ocean is actually the planet's lung
"I remember when..." is like a new template for a children's book in the same vein as "Goodnight Moon" or "Everyone Poops" lol
Since when did we start listening to kids about real problems, like they can barely do they're times table dude
What nobody hits at are the biggest polluters: Production and construction. Energy production, car production, solar panel production, and really anything else you can think of. An average cheap car running at 26 miles per gallon, driven the average amount an American drives every year (which is a lot, by the way) will take at least 8 years to output as much CO2 from its exhaust pipe as it took to build the damn thing. And, yes, that is per-car. Keep in mind that more expensive cars tend to use more exotic materials, so the CO2 cost of making a car tends to scale-up with its price to some degree.
Also keep in mind, I don't know how lifespan is on an electric car these days, but I know they've had serious problems with longevity in the past. I'm sure they're past most of it, and I hear there are lithium-ion battery designs now that will theoretically outlive the machines they're used in, but this is all stuff to consider. And, when you realize how low tailpipe emissions are on the food chain, it really makes you wonder why there's been such a push for electric cars...
Oh right, because they look like they're saving the environment, and we're dealing with the types of people whose favorite pass-time is virtue-signaling.
Greta was clearly ill-prepared-the two opposing clips of her prove that.
It might just be me but, when you put a child in an adult arena, it should be expected that they be challenged. After all, if they're there, then you think they can clearly take it, right?
Right?
Even if she does have it, her off-script response shows a lack of conviction in her cause, which looks terrible on any breed of activist.
This is the most rational and relatable video I've ever watched. I wish I could visit Canada, so I could buy this guy a beer. 11/10.
00:27 Yeah, that would be my face too. Such an iconic image to demonstrate the issue with LGBT pride-parades today.
I didn't catch that the first time through. Thank you for pointing that out. It will be burned in my brain forever.
Ecofascist? more like Ecocommunists
please look up what those two words mean. you might have them mixed up.
Ecommunist
@ThatBadGuy except for "global" nothing about what they are doing strikes me as communis but it does strike me as slightly fashist.
That sound like the AOC university degree, I don't know why the people misheard she is an economist.
Potato potatoes.
Was literally talking about your opening statement with my mom the other day.
I have found myself talking against deplatforming to someone I know by saying "have you forgotten how it went in 2009?"
I heard a solution to the death of plankton would be seeding areas with Iron dust, to feed the organisms that eat the CO2. Those organisms would also be fish food, which could help against overfishing.
I can just barely remember when things were like that. I was born and became politically active right as things were changing, and now I’m a lockean liberal arguing with communists at college.
The climates fine. The sun is the single largest factor, how many radiation storms it has how violent they are. Thats what really decides our climate
Its kinda sad none of the major parties in hour country bring up that climate change can be positive.
Who do you believe -- a hysterical young girl or 500 scientists?
Which 500?
I’m 18 just like Greta why don’t I have a seat at the un to tell them about my love for a certain man who died in 1945
heck, why can't I profess my love on some dude who died lonely in 1821 or that dude that died in 1226
"The planet is gasping her death because of you!" *Squishes cricket in anger.* - Hipster Grocer from The Shivering Truth
You better believe that I have a steak every sunday.
Saturdays too Here : )
Eating one right now.
yeah, people really didnt read the NZ shooters manifesto
That's not what EcoFacism is!
Listen to Death In June 😂😂😂
As someone in their early 30s and being a liberal back in the day(high school) I remember when being on the left was about freedom.
The thing about our planet and temp increased is that the warming and cooling happens mostly at the poles while the equator stays relatively constant. So it wouldn’t get any worse to live there, only better in the northern climates
The issue in the equator wouldnt be temperature. It would be rising sea levels and other climate changes not directly related to temperature.
The Right's position on climate change isn't an "ostrich with its head in the sand". In fact, the Right doesn't have a unified opinion on climate change. Most people on the Conservative Right tend to think of climate change in one of two ways: 1) it is heavily overblown and doesn't pose an existential treat to the Earth, or 2) it is a plot by the government to suppress constitutional liberties. The Libertarian Right sometimes thinks it exists, but they insist that free-market capitalism can solve the issue. The Nationalist Right usually admits that it exists, and they take great pains to rectify it through government action, since they believe in protecting a nation's natural landscape. A rightist's response to climate change depends on his position _within_ the right side of the political spectrum. Also, there is a difference between environmentalism and conservationism.
Look up The Red Elephant, he debunks this myth over and over again with an astrophysicist.
Having grown up in a member country of NATO during the Cold War in the 70s and 80s, living in cities that were nuclear targets hearing these clowns say I have no idea how it feels to expect the world to end makes me laugh.
Thank you very much sir, this is by far the most nuanced perspective I have gotten to hear so far.
EAT THE BUGS
LIVE IN THE POD
WEAR THE CHAIR
I remember being in university and hanging out with pot smoking, PC feminists. They seemed radical and different to this country boy.
Turns out the shine wears off quickly.
If she survives people, Greta will need her parent's money to get through therapy. Lucky for her she's shielded from reality enough to afford years of it.
Man, if only there was some magic ore that could produce copious amounts of energy with close to zero carbon dioxide emissions and only minimal amounts of permanent waste compared to what fosil fuels produce.
How unfortunate that we live in a world where there is no such perfect energy supply, guess we'll just keep relying on coal.
Buh buh- muh chornobil
Thorium is the fuel of the future
Its also funny when people complain about the potential safety risks of magic but then completely write off the safety risks of all the green energies. Such as all the mechanics and such who die working on windmills.
Never use a potato as your mascot. She is the reason this movement dies.
Of all the countries that really should be reducing their carbon emissions, is also the 2 countries that have the largest population: China, and India. But that’s racist, to even consider that.
The situation with reefs have been solved completely and now in ten years we'll have a thousand years worth of reef growth.
Mestre Shake
So, you won’t mind posting your source material for that claim huh?
This I really wanna know
Need sauce for that claim
"coral reefs growth technique" first result from Google. I swear that I miss when we lined stupid people against brick walls.
@@abrunosON Not like I go searching on it on the daily or something. Sometimes specific sites that are well-trusted are best to show some things like that. Many places can claim something is legit.
"Haha wouldn't it be funny if all of America lived in pods and ate ze bug and owned nothing and was totally not forced to be happy to definitely help the environment? While i totally do not sit in my ivory mega mansion sipping the oldest bourbon, zat would be hilarious." - Klaus Schwab
Literally saw David the other day lmao I was just passing by otherwise I would've confronted him
dev did you see a swedish church said she was more or less the second coming of christ
"ThE KeEy Is NoT EEaeT MeAt" this you can heard in chile my lads
Remember: "Fascist state is an ethical state therefore democracy par excellence."
Giovanni Gentile wrote it more than 100 years ago.
Is it detrimental?
Idk dude, I'm pretty sure the science is settled on this too. Yes, there are some benefits, but you know it would cost a bit to move *billions* of people and the cities from close to the equator to Sibiria.
Who cares about the billions of people near the equator who will die or be displaced? We get a bit of extra farmland. Yah.
God, I remember watching the Daily Show religiously and getting my news from MSNBC, mocking the crazies at Fox News with glee.
I miss that.
I kinda don't. I wish I could debate myself back then.
I jumped for joy when Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize, but looking back, I never had any policy on my mind at all.
I wanna jump to that moment and ask myself "Why?"
I don't think I would have said anything except for "He's the first black president" without any irony.
I rooted for Hillary only because she was female, literally no other reason, in the slightest. And I somehow laughed at the "jokes" john oliver would say.
It's just disturbing
I know right, now it's Fox News that the reasonable (although not all the time) and MSNBC, BBC and the rest of them of the liberal media are now the crazies.
@@oxthree448 I think what you mean to say is Tucker Carlson is reasonable.
@@vanilla8956 You're probable right I don't watch a lot of mainstream news anyway. Apart from sky news Australia which I do watch sometimes just as reasonable.
@@vanilla8956 I remember the days leading up to the election of Obama when I asked a friend why she wanted to vote for him. She said, "Because I want to be able to say that I voted for the first black president."
When I pointed out that she was deciding who to vote for based on skin color, she just gave me this confused look. I still shake my head thinking about it.
Cold is not the only barrier to growth in northerly regions, sunlight is often overlooked in debates regarding climate change. For example, we can already see parts of the Carolinian zone in southern Canada starting to spread north in Ontario, but many of these plants die out at a certain point because the annual sunlight is insufficient to sustain them. Infer from this what you will, but it's another factor we may need to adapt to moving forward.
Soils are different, too. You can't compare boreal forest soils to great plains soils.
The other problem with people saying that warming will be a good thing is that they aren't paying attention to rainfall patterns and extreme weather events, particularly hail. Climate instability is a really bad thing from a farming point of view. The kind of farming we do right now is predicated on a whole bunch of factors. With farming's low profit margins things have to be pretty finely tuned to work.
Its a shame that the greenhouse effect of water vapour makes CO2 look like a fart in a hurricane in comparison, but you cant sell water vapour credits to industry so *crickets*.
Okay but water can easily condensate out of the atmosphere and return to liquid form at atmospheric pressure.
On climate change:
1. The icecaps usually melt completely between ice ages regardless of humans.
2. The global atmospheric level of CO2 before the industrial revolution was decreasing and nearly low enough that plant life would have died and life on Earth ended.
3. Since we have sent up satalites an effect called the "greening of Earth" has occurred, observable from space. In effect the amount of plants and plant growth on Earth has drastically increased.
[citation needed]
i doubt a lack of co2 wouldve "killed the planet" but yes co2 is plant food its probably the best thing we can do is put as much of it into the air as possible
@@badradish2116 plants begin having serious growth difficulty at around 80 ppm and dying at 70 ppm or less. The global average in 1700 was like 100 ppm and trending down.
Can someone else explain to him how wrong that statement was?
@@austintheforecaster2995 you can't or you would have done it.
Unrelated but whoever you find to do the art in your videos (especially this one) are absolutely fascinating.
Eco fascists are decent people. But I noticed they're still crazier than me.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions
I don't know... The ecofascists from my university don't seem very decent.
DragonFlyerz the racist ones or the leftists??
@@pecansauce4030 Well I meant the leftists but I guess they're probably racist as well.
IMO "Is it Man made?" is the wrong question, since as you say, it's without a doubt that the billions of us alive are affecting some effect.
The better one IMO is "To what degree are we responsible?"
The climate is complex, multivariate, and has observable cyclical patterns, and it's not impossible that we're being made to take responsibility for one of them.
If true, that that would be the height of human hubris, and hamartia awaits.
oh damn, just noticed this video's 3 years old, guess it showed up now because of the Andrew Tate situation
Us in Ireland just despise Eco-Fascism, mainly due to the fact our country has been using more reusable energy way before it was cool or claimed by Eco Fascists
i remember when in 2000 they said europe would be flooded by 2020. i guess we'll see if that comes true in another 20 years. and another 20. and another. and another. and another. it's coming bro, trust me
The science wasn't new 20 years ago. The theory of CO2 and climate is over 100 years old. Conservatives weren't always opposed to addressing the issue either. Margaret Thatcher talked about it in the 80s.
Can't we just take these ecofascists down for good and use them as fertilizers? it's a win win, they help the enviroment and they finally stop annoying everyone else
It is important to note that more water vapor exists as a green house gas than carbon monoxide, and the only thing that controls that is the sun and weather. Being on a rock flying around a giant light bulb leads to random changes in temp at times
They have been saying this for nearly 50 years
I’m sorry but I don’t recall the liberals being sane when I was growing up in the 80s and 90s. I actually recall the Democrats as the ones holding hearings on violence and in video games. Joe Liberman, Tipper Gore (wife of Al Gore) are two that come to mind and I don’t remember them as being for individual liberty. Maybe my memory is faulty but politics makes strange bedfellows as my grandparents used to say.
Soph is actually way more intelligent than Greta, she can answer her own questions and isn’t scripted in interviews.
I remember it. I used to consider myself on the left. I'm anything but that now. What happened during covid definitely sealed that deal.
Greta t's Un speech: When you use Syfy channel shark film's as a catalyst for your speech at the UN climate change
Dev talking about the Northwest Passage immediately makes me think of that one Dreadnoughts song about said Northwest Passage
SFO, you should check out a Channel called Tony Heller, I don't remember how I bumped into his channel but the truth of environmental science has been eye opening! The amount of purposely altering data is ridiculous
Tony can't handle taking the L, though. If he can't admit his mistakes then I can't take his videos at face value.
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD Taking the L? I have no clue what you are on about?
@@Mragogo300 he got absolutely murdered by potholer54 and refused to take the loss like an adult.
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD First time I've heard about it and just looked into it, interesting that the debate is still ongoing, still it's good that discussion is occurring plus if there is anything to take away from Tony Heller's videos, it is the point that there are organisations that are purposely changing data for their own ends
Watching this in 2022. I forgot how creepy that first greta thunberg video is.
"Clap on" *clap clap* Mad Max
"Clap off" *clap clap* Snowpiercer
I'm already getting doll heads together. Stay shinny brother
@@anilin6353 Don't forget your vegemite squares.
@@johnbrown1090 I would rather eat bugs.
the population issue has two potential solutions, but one that keeps the Current Powers in Control, the Good solution is to double down on Space travel, and work out how to make other planets habitable for human life, and space travel to said planets possible and practical for the average person, the other "Solution" the one that doesn't involve potentially releasing people from the sphere of influence, is Deliberate depopulation.
11:18 omg he said it. >:D
This is fucking gold. Man, thank you for this video, the whole eco thing is kind of fucking with my mind and i really neded someone to clearify all the fluff thats surrounding ecofaschists
That fan art makes u look like Aethelwold from the Last Kingdom
I will never let go of my rule; once you bring a child into it, you lost me and your message. That doesn't mean I will deny climate change or justice just because someone brought their kid at a protest. But I am saying that if you endanger a kid at a protest or force a kid to be a public figure, you will lost my respect and I won't see you as a reliable person.
well to be fair, implementing socialism would solve overpopulation real quick
That's only if they move on from gulags to death camps! ;)
They picked a teen to rant over a topic so they could gather more support from more teens so those teens in question could rant just as Greta did. Very clever left, very clever.