@@lawrenceeason8007 Then you would say, "why doesn't God speak instead of a loud voice that I can barely take." As long as you cling to your sins, you'll continue to ignore evidence.
According to Egyptian propaganda they never lost a war and they ruled everywhere, propaganda has been around for a long time, possibly the snake in Eden was the first journalist.
Another interesting tidbit...Thutmose IV's grandson Akhenaten famously abandoned Egypt's traditional polytheism for a monotheistic religion. Scholars to this day have no clue why he would do that. Something had to of influenced him! And with the only other monotheistic religion around, that being the Hebrew God of the Bible, it really makes you wonder!
You do not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Look for the movie Patterns of Evidence: Exodus. There is plenty of archaeological evidence out there that people ignore. Satan has a vested interest in trying to make God look like a liar.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil
That would certainly be the case regarding the British and most European monarchies, but I think that only the firstborn had the right to the Egyptian throne. If the firstborn died it could be that the throne was then contested by all the other family members, including brothers of the deceased Pharaoh. I do stand corrected however.
@@horace9341 What you're missing is that firstborn basically means having the status of an heir. Succession in Egypt was based on being the oldest surviving son of the Pharoah's designated great queen. So it would have been relatively common for the firstborn to be younger than some of the sons of lesser queens. To take one commonly cited example Pharaoh Metneptah would only have been 17th in line to the throne if his older brothers hadn't predeceased Ramses II. But there is no evidence of any controversy over him taking the throne That said, even if Frank was right about this text showing that Thutmos IV wasn't first in line to the throne, it's not really relevant to the Exodus since the cities that Exodus says the Israelites built parts of (Pithom and Ramses) weren't founded for several generations after his reign. I'd strongly recommend watching the review of Frank's earlier video on the Exodus by an Egyptologist over on the channel Ancient Egypt and the Bible to get a good idea of how much what he's saying on this issue is actually supported by the evidence.
@@stephengray1344 I don't know anything about ancient Egypt, but even from my layman's perspective it seemed like Frank was reaching to try and make this connection.
When he wrote the stela none had happened. He do not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
There’s a brilliant Indiana Jones video game that has just come out called ‘Indiana Jones and the Great Circle’ and as part of the game you explore Giza and actually look at the Dream Stele in front of the Spinx in order to locate a (fictional) secret tomb.
Seems a little stretched. Not sure how the Egyptians did it but usually if the older brother dies then the next brother is automatically in line for the inheritance.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Please note that Ronald Wyatt found the partually constructed tumb being built for Moses (before he lert) He found evidence of the path used by moses to get to the gulf of Aquba, He found an eroded stela on the egyptian side, the skeletons of the horses, the army with Pharaoh and chariots, and an intact stila on the other side. It states that Soloman put up the stila to mark the crossing.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Egyptian chronology is definitely not settled, despite what many will argue. Mainly due to Pharoah reigns are not always linear, sometimes more than one kingdom simultaneously.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2 brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
So interesting. There’s so much evidence for the veracity of the Bible. It’s all over history if one chooses to see it. In the end, no one will have excuse for not believing in God.
Rev Usher gave us the age by violating scripture as Paul said you can not use family tree for anything. The Sphinx is between 8 and 12 thousand years old. It makes NO difference how old the earth is, and whether there were human looking animals on earth. When YHWH made man he made him unique so that nothing before Adam matters because he is not them.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Frank, Love your videos about Biblical archeology. I know Joel Kramer is a friend of yours...A short while back he did a video on the supposed locations of Sodom and Gomorrah. He centered his claims around the ruins of pottery found near the south end of the Dead Sea. He very briefly mentioned the claim by Ron Wyatt that they are a bit farther north (Michael Rood has agreed with Ron's claim), and I believe the Israeli tourist organizations actually takes people up there by Midian and shows them the site claimed by Ron. Joel Kramer said "These are just sandstone formations..." True, Anyone can see the layers in them that are sandstone by nature, but how did they get carved and formed with such 90-degree angles and cuts? Not to mention the Sphinx-shaped sculptures found there. Shapes and angles like that don't form naturally in nature (And there are lots of sulfur balls there). It seems that if Joel doesn't want to believe something, he chooses to discredit it before thoroughly investigating it. Do you have any thoughts on this?
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
He would still have an inherited right anyhow if the first born dies, then it passes to the second male sibling. Just look at how potential kingship is defined amongst all the descendants in the royal family of Great Britain.
I was thinking that as well. I d don't know if I have this right...I do believe that some scholar said Hatshepsut may have been the only legitimate offspring/princess of Thutmose I that adopted Moses, married her half brother, and she later became co-regent for her stepson (illegitimate and installed after a coups - Thutmose III may have killed Hatshepsut and tried to erase her from history). There is a belief is that Thutmose III's first son was named Amenemhet and he dies before ascending. That would make Amenhotep II the Pharaoh who received boils from one of the plagues (evidence of cysts on his mummy from an account) but would have lived through the plague of the first born if he was second born. Thutmose IV was the son of a minor wife/concubine and so may not have had legitimacy for the throne.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 3 brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
I believe firmly in the Bible. Your argumentation however, is a bit weak, honestly. Its a random slipher of information that seems to fits the narative, IF interpreted as such. But on to itself, doesnt say all that much.
If you combine it with all the other archaeological evidence in the surrounding areas, and the time period that the person lived in, it doesn't seem random. Who are you trying to impress with your skepticism? It always baffles me that self proclaiming Christians always seem to be reluctant to accept truths that correspond to biblical history because they can't accept that perhaps what they were taught in school by atheists was perhaps not the truth.
I hear ya. It's a short video tho. Have you watched expedition bible? He does a video on the exodus pharoah. Also digging for truth did (i believe) 2 videos apart 1 and 2 deal about the subject. This stele is a Piece of evidence, but in and of itself isn't definitive. I hope you find them informative. Merry Christmas!
So. Frank isnt presenting this as absolute proof, but rather that its an interesting archeological find. So many will argue that Egyptian history proves that the Israel OT history is not true, yet this is one of many snippets that adds support
@wesleyjakesta4095 not necessarily. When you go to court, you're guilty beyond reasonable doubt. You still could be innocent, but you have guilt beyond reasonable. Doubt proof is only an eyewitness report. Everything else is circumstantial. Evidence. Now it's still evidence, but it's not proof
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Frank, Love your channel and watch a lot of your videos. Saw the previous one on the Pharaoh of the Exodus (Amenhotep). Michael Rood just did a livestream weekend where showed evidence that it was "Tom" or "Pithom." Can you comment on this? Also, I'm posting another comment here about Sodom & Gomorrah...
*The Egyptians considered all shepherds an abomination (See Genesis 46:31-47:7; especially Gen.**46:34**]* Jacob said they were shepherds when asked what his occupation was when he and his sons migrated to Egypt, after Joseph was revealed to them as second in command in Egypt. the father of 12 sons (which became the 12 tribes of Israel [Jacob]). *Therefore, the Egyptians would not be inclined to forever document defeat to a nation of shepherds (the Jews).* Joseph became second in command when he correctly interpreted a dream of Pharaoh which resulted in Joseph saving Egypt from the seven-year famine. The Jews were blessed by Pharaoh for saving Egypt and separated from the Egyptians in the Nile Delta area of Goshen. When Moses was born, years later, there arose a Pharaoh who "knew not Joseph." The Jews began to outnumber the Egyptians, causing the Pharaoh to fear a rebellion and coup. That Pharaoh enslaved the Jews, ending in the death of the first born, which caused the Pharaoh to release the Jews from slavery [Exodus 1:8-14].
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
@@vladtheemailer3223 Geologists on the government payroll, they will tell you ANYTHING to make sure you don't know you have a heavenly Father, that way THEY can play god over you.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
1446 BC is one view of Biblical dating. You cannot take Exodus 1:11 mentioning Pithom and Ramesses and 1 Kings 6:1 saying the temple was dedicated 480 years after the Exodus literally at the same time. 1265 BC (the late date) is just as "biblical" as the early date, but the late date actually fits into Egyptian and Canaanite history. The early date does not. Titus Kennedy is not an Egyptologist. He ignores data gets in his way. David Falk was censored after he crushed Kennedy in a debate that made Kennedy look like an undergrad.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
God puts a very high value on the firstborn son. There has to be extenuating circumstances for someone other than the firstborn son to get the main inheritance from the father. Interestingly, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob all gave the main inheritances to someone other than the firstborn son. But this was God's intervention. When God killed all the firstborn sons in Egypt, he broke the power of their bloodline. This was a powerful curse, much worse than having random people die.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Saying the louder doesn’t make it true. It’s insane the level of “evidence” you are willing to accept to justify your claims. This in no way, shape or form suggests the story of exodus.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses. No it was Amonhotep3
@ With all due respect sir you have it all wrong. I agree with most of what you said here and I’ll admit most of it I did not know…Nor do I care because I know for a fact that Moses was long dead and gone by the time of Thutmose…any of them. You have the wrong time period if you’re looking for Moses. I know this because I know who Moses was, and I’m the only person who knows. I’m doing you a solid by saving you a tremendous amount time, money, energy, etc…And I also know how strange this must be even now; here in the comment section. Jesus said when you hear the truth you hear his voice. Hear his voice now and I will have warp zoned you closer to finding Moses and the Pharaoh of the Exodus than you’ve ever been. If not, keep on the the path your on, but I think that even if your lucky, maybe in ten years or so you may come to the conclusion that every word I typed was accurate and true. I know why you believe what you do but you are incorrect. Moses time was before then…please trust me on this.
You do not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
It's circumstantial, because it was a dream and you can play with that all kinds of ways could have had a dream that he was pharaoh. Whether his brother was dead or not, but I repeat, it is good circumstantial evidence
So... not going to apologize for getting just about everything wrong? Just going to repost erroneous statements? Not a good look, and it erodes trust and credibility. Watch Dr. Falk's review on your evidence.
The seventh day Sabbath is evidence GOD exists. There are seven days in a week that is not by accident. You can make any new calendar you like it doesn't matter. Nothing can change a seven day week.
Not exactly. It's evidence that Babylon existed. Evidence shows that Babylon originated the 7 day week in 2300BC, long before the Israelite nation even existed. Authors of Genesis just used the existing 7 day week when they wrote their Genesis story between 500-900BC.
@criticalthinker2477 I would say Babylon the harlot stole it from GOD satan has a counterfeit for everything that GOD has said and done. The seventh day Sabbath is not just for the Israelites it was given to man at the creation .
The word week comes from Strongs H7620, shaw-boo'-ah, which literally means a period of seven days. If there was a calendar, such as the early Julian calendar at the time of Christ that had eight days, then it would not be called a week. Why? Because the word week means a period of seven days!
@watchmanofthenight2700 The name of the month was each new moon The days were named 1st Day Etc . Even the American Defence Forces agree no matter how many days in a week or a month or days in a year nothing can replace the seventh day week . The jews the seventh day Adventist the Seventh day Baptists all the other seventh day keepers have worked it out . The Catholic church agrees but they changed the day to the first day of the week
I absolutely believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God, but I also believe it has been manipulated many times over ... but my question is this: For the amount of time spent in Egypt throughout Genesis and Exodus, why are the great pyramids never mentioned in the modern text? Were they lost in translation?
Wouldn't it depend if it is part of the story? If I told you a story about a party I went to, just because I didn't mention the cake doesn't mean the story didn't happen. But it did say they made bricks but what for who knows? Take care
Why would they be mentioned? It's not like there's descriptions of areas where a pyramid should be and a pyramid is left out. In fact, the lack of a mention is more likely to be evidence for the events than against them. The pyramids would have been well known. Likely if someone knew *anything* about Egypt, they would know about their existence. So if someone later, living elsewhere, was making up the story, it would be a natural thing to add to try to sell their tale. Much like someone making up a story about Paris may be more likely to randomly mention the Eiffel Tower, while someone who lives there isn't likely to it if it's not really connected to the story.
@charliedontsurf334 No, the Eiffel Tower isn't. Neither are the pyramids talked about by everyone who lives in Egypt who is discussing current events. If you watch a news report of something political happening in Egypt today, would you expect the pyramids to be mentioned? At what point in the Exodus narrative would there be any reason to mention pyramids?
Exodus 12:12 "I will bring judgment on all the (NON EXISTANT) gods of egypt." 😂😂😂 Yall so busy believing, u forget to READ and THINK about what u just read. The "all knowing" speaking of judging imaginary beings. Think about it folks.
You misunderstand. These 'gods' were shown to be man made frauds and that is the point of God's judgment. He took on each one in turn with the plagues ramping up in intensity. The magicians could replicate the first few miracles. But the 'gods' they worshipped could not stop the plagues, including the final one. Horus is associated with resurrection, protection, and divine right to rule. That Pharaoh relented only after Horus was shown to be powerless makes perfect sense. He experienced personal loss despite 'divine' right to rule and belief in the eventual apotheosis of each Pharaoh (god-king).
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Before the flood the earth had a 360 day year. When venus hit and flatsided mars it knocked mars, located between it and us out to where it is now. It passed by earth, the force pulled earth out so it orbited 5 days longer, and dumped most of mars water on earth (the flood)
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
@@kinggenius930 Which Scholars, there is a lot of evidence, but it seems it's just a debate between the atheist and Christian scholars and the scholarly consensus you are taking is from the atheist side. Which means there is no true scholarly consensus.
“Adding forty years to these dates to allow for the interval between the exodus and the fall of Jericho, the date of the exodus would be between 1440 B.C. and 1415 B.C., which is a close approximation to the 1446 B.C. already deduced from other considerations.”
Yes, the 430 years includes the time in Canaan per the LXX (Ex 12,40 and Gal 3,17). First they spent 215 years in Canaan and then 215 years in Egypt. The Exodus happened at the completion of those 430 years. And thanks to 1 Kings 6,1 we know that the Exodus happened in 1446 BC. And thanks to Judges 11,26 we know that they entered Canaan in 1406 BC. 👇👇👇 1 Kings 6,1 = 480 years (966 BC + 480 = 1446 BC) Judges 11,26 = 300 years (1106 BC + 300 = 1406 BC) BINGO. A perfect match. Scripture is clear.
@@wesleyjakesta4095 You cannot always read numbers in the Bible literally unless you think a Christian doesn't have to forgive someone on time 491 (Matthew 18:21). Frodojack is right. The Exodus happened about 1265 BC. 480 years of 1 Kings 6:1 is 12 tribes * 40 years (long indeterminate time often associated with renewal). And the Egyptians and Canaanites used symbolic numbers on their Temple dedications, so it follows the Israelites would too.
NO ur was 1446 to 26 BC They have screwed with your time. Before 1720 Christmass was on what is now the fifteenth of April and the new year started on or about April 1
Adding forty years to these dates to allow for the interval between the exodus and the fall of Jericho, the date of the exodus would be between 1440 B.C. and 1415 B.C., which is a close approximation to the 1446 B.C. already deduced from other considerations.
Thanks to 1 Kings 6,1 we know that the Exodus happened in 1446 BC. Thanks to Judges 11,26 we know that they entered Canaan in 1406 BC. 👇👇👇 1 Kings 6,1 = 480 years (966 BC + 480 = 1446 BC) Judges 11,26 = 300 years (1106 BC + 300 = 1406 BC) BINGO. A perfect match. Scripture is clear.
@@daduzadude1547 Problem with that, besides the physical evidence of the Merenptah-Stele, is the numbers 480 and 300 are as literal as they get. Jephthah (the Ninth Judge) had ZERO reason to use a symbolic number when he told the king of Ammon that they already lived in Israel for 300 years. Everybody knows that Jephthah lived in 1106 BC. 300 years prior to that is 1406 BC. Exactly 40 years after 1446 BC. This goes perfect with the archeological evidence. The Merneptah Stele, also called the Israel Stele, is an ancient Egyptian inscription dated to around 1208 BC during the reign of Pharaoh Merneptah, the son of Ramses II. It is significant because it contains the earliest known non-biblical reference to "Israel" and is one of the key pieces of evidence regarding the existence of early Israel as a people group. When you say that the Exodus happened in 1250 BC (late dating) then that means the Israelites entered Canaan in 1210 BC (Just 2 years prior to the Merneptah Stele in 1208 BC). However, there are multiple problems with this theory: First, the Bible gives ZERO indication that the Egyptians laid waste of Israel just 2 years after they conquered Canaan. None whatsoever. Second, there are ZERO exegetical reasons to ''symbolize'' the numbers given in 1 Kings 6,1 and Judges 11,26. It's obvious that they are literal figures.
Great evidence against the Biblical story of the Exodus! The Egyptians were familiar with the concept of death. They knew that first borns did not always survive their parents. This did not come as a shock. So if the King's first born son had died, his second born would naturally become crown prince and no other justification would be needed. If we interpret the so-called Dream Stele as a justification for a second born son to succeed his father, then the most plausible explanation is that the first born son was still alive but impaired, or that there had been strife between them and the second son had come out on top. Neither explanation would support the Biblical narrative. And to quote Dr. Turek: _"That's what many scholars are saying."_
@@annemurphy9339 You said: _"All archaeological discoveries consistently support the biblical narrative of people, places, and events."_ And yet here we have an archaeological discovery that clearly does not. Have you actually read my comment? There are plenty of archaeological discoveries that support some of the historical data about some of the people, places and events in the Bible, sure. In general, the texts we can corroborate date from after the exilic period. Texts dealing with the patriarchs are generally uncorroborated, or even contain anachronisms, showing they were written or changed centuries later. Most crucially however, we have no corroboration for *_any_* of the supernatural events described in the Bible (or in any other holy book, for that matter). If you disagree, please provide your favorite evidence of this kind, so we can discuss it.
The Biblical narrative has proven and shown many instances of it being true. Especially from archaeologists, even if they are biased, it’s definitely clear and concise.
@@hansdemos6510 Of course, that's why they are miracles. If they could be done so naturally, they wouldn't be miracles, but they will be natural powers. The only logical dilemma here is the existence of God, because it is common sense that a creator can have the power to interfere in creation and therefore affect it unnaturally in a way we call miraculous. But if your worldview is presupposed to the existence of God being a delusion, you are of course going to see all that as a fairytale. So the problem is not the bible, it's you r interpretation of it with respect to the existence of God.
@@wesleyjakesta4095 You said: _"The Biblical narrative has proven and shown many instances of it being true."_ Some things, sure, just like some things in other ancient texts have been corroborated by material evidence. But crucially none of the supernatural claims in the Bible (or in any other texts) has ever been corroborated by for example archaeological evidence. You said: _"Especially from archaeologists, even if they are biased, it’s definitely clear and concise."_ I don't know why archaeologists would be "biased", but it is clear that no archaeological support for any of the supernatural events described in the Bible or any other text has ever been found. If you disagree, then please provide me with your favorite example so we can discuss it.
@@gi169 I have just watched a video on the channel 'God's Cottage'. I can't post a link in these sections. The priest talks about many things, but is warning about what we look at and how, little by little, it can lead us places we shouldn't be going. I don't think we should or need to look at comments from a lot of folk here, many of them are so boringly predictable that they can and should be simply ignored. By responding, we, perhaps unwittingly, inspire them to carry on, our responses feed their 'rush'.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
@wanttopreach Moses and tutmose were actually common names amongst Egyptian royalty. I think Ramses xi was the pharaoh of Exodus. His history tells is a rebellion in a Thibus that caused a lot of problems. After his death, Egypt was split into 3 regions for 2 generations. The priests took over one region, probably to erase history. They wouldn't want their own power to be diminished because God proved that he existed. Ramses xi had problems with one of his generals. 2 notes were found from him. One said, "he is the pharaoh of what?" The other have instructions. "Take these two bodies, and lower them into the river. Then say nothing of this." Moses was given the position of general. There are other indications. You have to look into it.
@wanttopreach oh and if you look 400 years before Ramses xi, you'll see that tutmose III sacked Jerusalem, and made a list of the captured slaves, as well as livestock, weapons, and other spoils.
Christianity needs Egypt which is why Christianity is always trying to use Egypt for validation. Egypt dont say isht about any biblical mythology. You can go to Egypt and study and see all of the artifacts and not know anything about a Hebrew. This is silly. Its so hard for myths to stand on their own.
No Jospep in made into a god imhotep 3 centuries later and there is a stela with proof on it! Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
@@sinclairj7492 Basically yes. Papyri: Records from a work gang of 160 men show that they were well fed and treated. The records include logbooks and accounting documents. Most archaeologists and historians today believe that the pyramids were built by paid laborers, not enslaved people. Cemeteries: Workers were buried in tombs near the pyramids, with supplies for the afterlife. Food: Archaeologists found large quantities of meat and fish in a nearby port city, and bread jars in the workers' tombs. Barracks: Archaeologists found evidence of large barracks for the workers. Graffiti: Workers left graffiti on buildings, including the names of work gangs, towns, and regions.
King tut was the son of akhenaten that was the one who actually made the exodus. 😂😂 nobody spoke of moses for over 500 years. Why do Christians hate truth so much
So you got it wrong in that akhenaten was the so called bastard son of Pharoah and his common wife.King Tut was the son of Tutmoses 3 Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
@wanttopreach he was persecuted over the ideologies of divinity thus the need for the exodus. You could even say the arc was present and was removed upon his departure. But for the name sake of moses you are making a long leap of linguistics to justify this name. The fact of the matter is moses was a fictional character, based on a true person that lead a symbolic exodus not physical which an entire nation was formed based upon thinking it was real. But again, not a single nation mentioned anything regarding moses for over 500 years after the dated fact because by then the library of Alexandria was burned and history had a glimmer of time to be manipulated and in essence rewritten. What they failed to realize is that other nations weren't so willing to destroy their history and records as the Greeks were. Much had to be rewritten in order to be passed on. But history is quite literally written in stone before akhenaten and before their empire. History is much deeper than a religion will ever allow you to see. Which is why Greeks attested akhenaten also because the pantheons were all they knew. They couldn't understand there was an actual creator above them. Jesus learned this also which is why he like you mentioned was persecuted in similar to akhenaten. But moses itself was never a living person. He didn't do anything nor invent anything. It was preexisting for at least 1,000 years before his invention
@wanttopreach ps, the epic of gilgamesh is a factual record. It may have its exaggerations as all legends, but the tomb and the main lands have been discovered. I mention this only because the bible be it jewish torah or Christian orthodox, all between, are meant for control and mass submission. You learn our ancestors were more truthful than we are told you'll see how fairytale the bible really is.
![[PODCAST] 8 Lines of Evidence FROM EGYPT for the Exodus](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2UxkQqrqkK8/mqdefault.jpg)
Download FREE Cheat Sheet “The 4-Point Case For Christianity” 👉📱cutt.ly/ZYMC4nl
If humans don't speak the rocks will cry out! Praise Christ Jesus ❤
Amen!!!!!!❤
Islam stol this saying
Hallelujah 🙌
Why doesn’t this claimed god speak instead of human hearsay or rocks?
@@lawrenceeason8007 Then you would say, "why doesn't God speak instead of a loud voice that I can barely take." As long as you cling to your sins, you'll continue to ignore evidence.
Not surprised that the ancient Egyptians didn't want to chronicle their defeat by the Hebrews God.
Why did this God want to defeat them in a battle?
@@mattr.1887
🤣😂😅 Battle... Hardly.
Why did egyptians write about other defeats?
@friisteching3433 They haven't
According to Egyptian propaganda they never lost a war and they ruled everywhere, propaganda has been around for a long time, possibly the snake in Eden was the first journalist.
Another interesting tidbit...Thutmose IV's grandson Akhenaten famously abandoned Egypt's traditional polytheism for a monotheistic religion. Scholars to this day have no clue why he would do that. Something had to of influenced him! And with the only other monotheistic religion around, that being the Hebrew God of the Bible, it really makes you wonder!
Bruce Gore has a great lecture on this.
You do not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Finally!! The archeology all points to biblical evidence 🙏🏻
Only some of it. Much of the bible actually contradicts evidence
Look for the movie Patterns of Evidence: Exodus.
There is plenty of archaeological evidence out there that people ignore.
Satan has a vested interest in trying to make God look like a liar.
@@protorhinocerator142show a scientific archaeological paper that concludes there was an exodus as described in the bible
There is zero evidence for millions of Jewish slaves in Egypt
When you make things up it always fits wherever you want it to.
Jesus Christ thanks GOD we have a Frank Turek to go more deep in the research !!!! Im very grateful of that ❤
Thank you CrossExamined
Archeology confirming the truth of the Bible
Only part of it. Much of it actually contradicts evidence
@@lawrenceeason8007That’s not true. Archaeology is frequently proving the veracity of the Bible.
@@chronic_daydreameras I said, part of it. But there is quite a bit that isn’t and also there are alot of claims in the bible that contradict evidence
@ Fair enough.
@@chronic_daydreamerappreciate your input. Always welcome
Wow. Most convoluted explanation ever.
Wow this is so interesting!! Love it ❤
Your amazing. Love to be your student. ❤
Nice 👍
Fascinating indeed!
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil
This god didn’t love the children/babies it killed in the 10th plague
If his brother had already died, wouldn't that mean that he (Thutmos 4) is already next in line to the throne?
That would certainly be the case regarding the British and most European monarchies, but I think that only the firstborn had the right to the Egyptian throne. If the firstborn died it could be that the throne was then contested by all the other family members, including brothers of the deceased Pharaoh. I do stand corrected however.
@@horace9341 What you're missing is that firstborn basically means having the status of an heir. Succession in Egypt was based on being the oldest surviving son of the Pharoah's designated great queen. So it would have been relatively common for the firstborn to be younger than some of the sons of lesser queens. To take one commonly cited example Pharaoh Metneptah would only have been 17th in line to the throne if his older brothers hadn't predeceased Ramses II. But there is no evidence of any controversy over him taking the throne
That said, even if Frank was right about this text showing that Thutmos IV wasn't first in line to the throne, it's not really relevant to the Exodus since the cities that Exodus says the Israelites built parts of (Pithom and Ramses) weren't founded for several generations after his reign. I'd strongly recommend watching the review of Frank's earlier video on the Exodus by an Egyptologist over on the channel Ancient Egypt and the Bible to get a good idea of how much what he's saying on this issue is actually supported by the evidence.
@@stephengray1344 I don't know anything about ancient Egypt, but even from my layman's perspective it seemed like Frank was reaching to try and make this connection.
When he wrote the stela none had happened. He do not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
There’s a brilliant Indiana Jones video game that has just come out called ‘Indiana Jones and the Great Circle’ and as part of the game you explore Giza and actually look at the Dream Stele in front of the Spinx in order to locate a (fictional) secret tomb.
Seems a little stretched. Not sure how the Egyptians did it but usually if the older brother dies then the next brother is automatically in line for the inheritance.
He had the dream before it happened most likely in which case he was NOT entitled to the throne.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Is the greatest pyramid a silo for grain?
Question. How do we know who the pharaoh of the Exodus was? I thought that was a bit of a mystery.
Please note that Ronald Wyatt found the partually constructed tumb being built for Moses (before he lert) He found evidence of the path used by moses to get to the gulf of Aquba, He found an eroded stela on the egyptian side, the skeletons of the horses, the army with Pharaoh and chariots, and an intact stila on the other side. It states that Soloman put up the stila to mark the crossing.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Great insight!
Interesting idea but Thutmose IV started his reign in 1401 BC. Isn't that too late?
Egyptian chronology is definitely not settled, despite what many will argue.
Mainly due to Pharoah reigns are not always linear, sometimes more than one kingdom simultaneously.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2 brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
But if the elder brother died wouldn't he have a legitimate claim to the throne?
I was making the connection on how this is proving the Bible? Just wondering what the connection was.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Wow! How interesting!
Tutankhamen was the first born son of the pharaoh who was struck down by the Angel of Death from God Almighty.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
There are signals of the Flood because of the horizontal grooves.
No evidence of a worldwide flood
No, that is evidence of rain.
@@kevinkelly2162 yes, the rain fell perpetually and then caused a flood.
No...the flood created the sandstone that the sphinx is made from.
@@lepterfirefallplease reference a scientific/geological article that concludes there was ever a worldwide flood
Wow, thanks
🙏🙏🙏
So interesting. There’s so much evidence for the veracity of the Bible. It’s all over history if one chooses to see it. In the end, no one will have excuse for not believing in God.
The sphinx is a symbol of the sky showing us the head of the woman (virgo) body of lion. (Leo) beginning and ending.
Awesome 😎
Really makes me wonder how the sphinx looked like back then, and just how old that thing is.
Older than Adam.
@kevinkelly2162 What makes you think that?
@@kevinkelly2162 ??
Rev Usher gave us the age by violating scripture as Paul said you can not use family tree for anything. The Sphinx is between 8 and 12 thousand years old. It makes NO difference how old the earth is, and whether there were human looking animals on earth. When YHWH made man he made him unique so that nothing before Adam matters because he is not them.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Frank, Love your videos about Biblical archeology. I know Joel Kramer is a friend of yours...A short while back he did a video on the supposed locations of Sodom and Gomorrah. He centered his claims around the ruins of pottery found near the south end of the Dead Sea. He very briefly mentioned the claim by Ron Wyatt that they are a bit farther north (Michael Rood has agreed with Ron's claim), and I believe the Israeli tourist organizations actually takes people up there by Midian and shows them the site claimed by Ron. Joel Kramer said "These are just sandstone formations..." True, Anyone can see the layers in them that are sandstone by nature, but how did they get carved and formed with such 90-degree angles and cuts? Not to mention the Sphinx-shaped sculptures found there. Shapes and angles like that don't form naturally in nature (And there are lots of sulfur balls there). It seems that if Joel doesn't want to believe something, he chooses to discredit it before thoroughly investigating it. Do you have any thoughts on this?
Please submit your question or comment to our ministry here bit.ly/2LFY8NL
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
He would still have an inherited right anyhow if the first born dies, then it passes to the second male sibling. Just look at how potential kingship is defined amongst all the descendants in the royal family of Great Britain.
I was thinking that as well. I d don't know if I have this right...I do believe that some scholar said Hatshepsut may have been the only legitimate offspring/princess of Thutmose I that adopted Moses, married her half brother, and she later became co-regent for her stepson (illegitimate and installed after a coups - Thutmose III may have killed Hatshepsut and tried to erase her from history). There is a belief is that Thutmose III's first son was named Amenemhet and he dies before ascending. That would make Amenhotep II the Pharaoh who received boils from one of the plagues (evidence of cysts on his mummy from an account) but would have lived through the plague of the first born if he was second born. Thutmose IV was the son of a minor wife/concubine and so may not have had legitimacy for the throne.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 3 brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
As a retired LEO, Love the hat👍 🙏
🙂🙂🙂
I believe firmly in the Bible. Your argumentation however, is a bit weak, honestly. Its a random slipher of information that seems to fits the narative, IF interpreted as such. But on to itself, doesnt say all that much.
If you combine it with all the other archaeological evidence in the surrounding areas, and the time period that the person lived in, it doesn't seem random.
Who are you trying to impress with your skepticism? It always baffles me that self proclaiming Christians always seem to be reluctant to accept truths that correspond to biblical history because they can't accept that perhaps what they were taught in school by atheists was perhaps not the truth.
Sure, it's between the Sphinx's feet, but let's call it random...
I hear ya. It's a short video tho. Have you watched expedition bible? He does a video on the exodus pharoah. Also digging for truth did (i believe) 2 videos apart 1 and 2 deal about the subject. This stele is a Piece of evidence, but in and of itself isn't definitive.
I hope you find them informative. Merry Christmas!
So. Frank isnt presenting this as absolute proof, but rather that its an interesting archeological find.
So many will argue that Egyptian history proves that the Israel OT history is not true, yet this is one of many snippets that adds support
Praise to the Lord
That's not proof but it is circumstantial evidence which I love
Evidence is proof
@@wesleyjakesta4095not necessarily. Depends on the evidence
@wesleyjakesta4095 not necessarily.
When you go to court, you're guilty beyond reasonable doubt. You still could be innocent, but you have guilt beyond reasonable. Doubt proof is only an eyewitness report. Everything else is circumstantial. Evidence. Now it's still evidence, but it's not proof
@@lawrenceeason8007🤣
@@wesleyjakesta4095 indeed. Depends on the evidence
But if his older brother died wouldn't he automatically have a right to the throne?
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Early vs late Exodus
There's an old writing by an poet that records the 10 plagues. UA-cam doesnt let you put links in the comments. Look it up
Do you know the name of the poet? I’m seeing a lot of poems
@badpiggy2403 give me a minute. I saved it to a playlist
@badpiggy2403 The lpuwer Papyrus and The 10 Plagues of Egypt "evidence 4 faith" youtube channel
Nice sphinx.
Frank, Love your channel and watch a lot of your videos. Saw the previous one on the Pharaoh of the Exodus (Amenhotep). Michael Rood just did a livestream weekend where showed evidence that it was "Tom" or "Pithom." Can you comment on this? Also, I'm posting another comment here about Sodom & Gomorrah...
*The Egyptians considered all shepherds an abomination (See Genesis 46:31-47:7; especially Gen.**46:34**]* Jacob said they were shepherds when asked what his occupation was when he and his sons migrated to Egypt, after Joseph was revealed to them as second in command in Egypt. the father of 12 sons (which became the 12 tribes of Israel [Jacob]). *Therefore, the Egyptians would not be inclined to forever document defeat to a nation of shepherds (the Jews).* Joseph became second in command when he correctly interpreted a dream of Pharaoh which resulted in Joseph saving Egypt from the seven-year famine. The Jews were blessed by Pharaoh for saving Egypt and separated from the Egyptians in the Nile Delta area of Goshen.
When Moses was born, years later, there arose a Pharaoh who "knew not Joseph." The Jews began to outnumber the Egyptians, causing the Pharaoh to fear a rebellion and coup. That Pharaoh enslaved the Jews, ending in the death of the first born, which caused the Pharaoh to release the Jews from slavery [Exodus 1:8-14].
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
And the Sphinx has visible water damage all about it from the great flood, also more than likely how the nose broke off.
Geologists have explained the damage. There was no great flood.
@@vladtheemailer3223 Geologists on the government payroll, they will tell you ANYTHING to make sure you don't know you have a heavenly Father, that way THEY can play god over you.
I don’t believe that the dates add up for amenhotep life. It can’t be Moses father.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
the rapture/resurrection is the fulfillment of Moses Exodus. thats why you need the two witnesses singing Moseses.
LET THE STONES SPEAK!
fishy ya all!!🐳🐋🐟
1446 BC is one view of Biblical dating. You cannot take Exodus 1:11 mentioning Pithom and Ramesses and 1 Kings 6:1 saying the temple was dedicated 480 years after the Exodus literally at the same time. 1265 BC (the late date) is just as "biblical" as the early date, but the late date actually fits into Egyptian and Canaanite history. The early date does not.
Titus Kennedy is not an Egyptologist. He ignores data gets in his way. David Falk was censored after he crushed Kennedy in a debate that made Kennedy look like an undergrad.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
God puts a very high value on the firstborn son. There has to be extenuating circumstances for someone other than the firstborn son to get the main inheritance from the father. Interestingly, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob all gave the main inheritances to someone other than the firstborn son. But this was God's intervention.
When God killed all the firstborn sons in Egypt, he broke the power of their bloodline. This was a powerful curse, much worse than having random people die.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Exodus was 1453 b.c.
Saying the louder doesn’t make it true. It’s insane the level of “evidence” you are willing to accept to justify your claims. This in no way, shape or form suggests the story of exodus.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
❤❤❤❤❤❤
Ahmenhotep II was not the Pharoah of the Exodus…Sorry
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses. No it was Amonhotep3
@ With all due respect sir you have it all wrong. I agree with most of what you said here and I’ll admit most of it I did not know…Nor do I care because I know for a fact that Moses was long dead and gone by the time of Thutmose…any of them. You have the wrong time period if you’re looking for Moses. I know this because I know who Moses was, and I’m the only person who knows. I’m doing you a solid by saving you a tremendous amount time, money, energy, etc…And I also know how strange this must be even now; here in the comment section. Jesus said when you hear the truth you hear his voice. Hear his voice now and I will have warp zoned you closer to finding Moses and the Pharaoh of the Exodus than you’ve ever been. If not, keep on the the path your on, but I think that even if your lucky, maybe in ten years or so you may come to the conclusion that every word I typed was accurate and true. I know why you believe what you do but you are incorrect. Moses time was before then…please trust me on this.
You do not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
❤
It's circumstantial, because it was a dream and you can play with that all kinds of ways could have had a dream that he was pharaoh. Whether his brother was dead or not, but I repeat, it is good circumstantial evidence
😂 Matt Groening nailed it again. Futurama, S3:E7 A Pharoah to Remember
Bender etches himself into a stone tablet making himself god-king.
So... not going to apologize for getting just about everything wrong? Just going to repost erroneous statements? Not a good look, and it erodes trust and credibility.
Watch Dr. Falk's review on your evidence.
Why must Frank screech so often?
Well, in Christian church we call it preaching, and it is to wake up weak minds into hearing the good news.
Do you know why the first born were killed?
Because you must be born again...... a second time
Why are you yelling?
I believe there’s history in the Bible - this argument is a stretch
The seventh day Sabbath is evidence GOD exists. There are seven days in a week that is not by accident. You can make any new calendar you like it doesn't matter. Nothing can change a seven day week.
Not exactly. It's evidence that Babylon existed. Evidence shows that Babylon originated the 7 day week in 2300BC, long before the Israelite nation even existed. Authors of Genesis just used the existing 7 day week when they wrote their Genesis story between 500-900BC.
@criticalthinker2477 I would say Babylon the harlot stole it from GOD satan has a counterfeit for everything that GOD has said and done. The seventh day Sabbath is not just for the Israelites it was given to man at the creation .
@@criticalthinker2477 The thing is more that every known civilisation got a seven days week.
The word week comes from Strongs H7620, shaw-boo'-ah, which literally means a period of seven days.
If there was a calendar, such as the early Julian calendar at the time of Christ that had eight days, then it would not be called a week.
Why?
Because the word week means a period of seven days!
@watchmanofthenight2700 The name of the month was each new moon The days were named 1st Day Etc . Even the American Defence Forces agree no matter how many days in a week or a month or days in a year nothing can replace the seventh day week . The jews the seventh day Adventist the Seventh day Baptists all the other seventh day keepers have worked it out . The Catholic church agrees but they changed the day to the first day of the week
I absolutely believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God, but I also believe it has been manipulated many times over ... but my question is this: For the amount of time spent in Egypt throughout Genesis and Exodus, why are the great pyramids never mentioned in the modern text? Were they lost in translation?
Wouldn't it depend if it is part of the story? If I told you a story about a party I went to, just because I didn't mention the cake doesn't mean the story didn't happen. But it did say they made bricks but what for who knows? Take care
Why would they be mentioned? It's not like there's descriptions of areas where a pyramid should be and a pyramid is left out. In fact, the lack of a mention is more likely to be evidence for the events than against them.
The pyramids would have been well known. Likely if someone knew *anything* about Egypt, they would know about their existence. So if someone later, living elsewhere, was making up the story, it would be a natural thing to add to try to sell their tale. Much like someone making up a story about Paris may be more likely to randomly mention the Eiffel Tower, while someone who lives there isn't likely to it if it's not really connected to the story.
Why would the pyramids be mentioned? Is the Eiffel Tower mentioned by everyone who talks about Paris?
@charliedontsurf334 No, the Eiffel Tower isn't. Neither are the pyramids talked about by everyone who lives in Egypt who is discussing current events. If you watch a news report of something political happening in Egypt today, would you expect the pyramids to be mentioned?
At what point in the Exodus narrative would there be any reason to mention pyramids?
@@shockthetoast That was my point. The Pyramids aren't relevant to the Exodus narrative, and thus aren't mentioned.
You need to calm down
Exodus 12:12 "I will bring judgment on all the (NON EXISTANT) gods of egypt." 😂😂😂 Yall so busy believing, u forget to READ and THINK about what u just read. The "all knowing" speaking of judging imaginary beings. Think about it folks.
You misunderstand. These 'gods' were shown to be man made frauds and that is the point of God's judgment. He took on each one in turn with the plagues ramping up in intensity. The magicians could replicate the first few miracles. But the 'gods' they worshipped could not stop the plagues, including the final one. Horus is associated with resurrection, protection, and divine right to rule. That Pharaoh relented only after Horus was shown to be powerless makes perfect sense. He experienced personal loss despite 'divine' right to rule and belief in the eventual apotheosis of each Pharaoh (god-king).
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
@@wanttopreach Interesting - I wondered if there was a common name link with Moses.
Might not be 1446 as there is some evidence that a OT year is 360 days...
Before the flood the earth had a 360 day year. When venus hit and flatsided mars it knocked mars, located between it and us out to where it is now. It passed by earth, the force pulled earth out so it orbited 5 days longer, and dumped most of mars water on earth (the flood)
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
@@wanttopreach Which book of the Bible is that in?
😂
Brother Frank. You are wrong on this one and Dr Falk an Egyptologist has created a video showing areas where you are wrong.
I thought the overwhelming scholarly consensus was that there is no evidence of the Exodus occurring?
Scholarly consensus 🤣😂😅
@@gi169 ?
There is actually considerable evidence. Much can be found online including on videos here on YT.
@@kinggenius930 Which Scholars, there is a lot of evidence, but it seems it's just a debate between the atheist and Christian scholars and the scholarly consensus you are taking is from the atheist side. Which means there is no true scholarly consensus.
@@annemurphy9339 What would that be?
why are you wearing a thin blue line gang cap?
The exodus was in the 1200s, not 1446. The 430 years includes the time in Canaan per the LXX.
“Adding forty years to these dates to allow for the interval between the exodus and the fall of Jericho, the date of the exodus would be between 1440 B.C. and 1415 B.C., which is a close approximation to the 1446 B.C. already deduced from other considerations.”
@wesleyjakesta4095 It's the 1200s. Go watch David Falk's explanation on his Ancient Egypt and the Bible channel.
Yes, the 430 years includes the time in Canaan per the LXX (Ex 12,40 and Gal 3,17). First they spent 215 years in Canaan and then 215 years in Egypt. The Exodus happened at the completion of those 430 years.
And thanks to 1 Kings 6,1 we know that the Exodus happened in 1446 BC.
And thanks to Judges 11,26 we know that they entered Canaan in 1406 BC.
👇👇👇
1 Kings 6,1 = 480 years
(966 BC + 480 = 1446 BC)
Judges 11,26 = 300 years
(1106 BC + 300 = 1406 BC)
BINGO. A perfect match. Scripture is clear.
@@wesleyjakesta4095 You cannot always read numbers in the Bible literally unless you think a Christian doesn't have to forgive someone on time 491 (Matthew 18:21). Frodojack is right. The Exodus happened about 1265 BC. 480 years of 1 Kings 6:1 is 12 tribes * 40 years (long indeterminate time often associated with renewal). And the Egyptians and Canaanites used symbolic numbers on their Temple dedications, so it follows the Israelites would too.
NO ur was 1446 to 26 BC They have screwed with your time. Before 1720 Christmass was on what is now the fifteenth of April and the new year started on or about April 1
I doubt that Frank even reads the comments.
This date has been discredited over and over again.
Titus Kennedy is wrong
Adding forty years to these dates to allow for the interval between the exodus and the fall of Jericho, the date of the exodus would be between 1440 B.C. and 1415 B.C., which is a close approximation to the 1446 B.C. already deduced from other considerations.
@@wesleyjakesta4095 try 1200’s
Thanks to 1 Kings 6,1 we know that the Exodus happened in 1446 BC.
Thanks to Judges 11,26 we know that they entered Canaan in 1406 BC.
👇👇👇
1 Kings 6,1 = 480 years
(966 BC + 480 = 1446 BC)
Judges 11,26 = 300 years
(1106 BC + 300 = 1406 BC)
BINGO. A perfect match. Scripture is clear.
Problem with that, besides the physical evidence, is that the dates are symbolic…
For example 480 = 12 x 40
@@daduzadude1547 Problem with that, besides the physical evidence of the Merenptah-Stele, is the numbers 480 and 300 are as literal as they get. Jephthah (the Ninth Judge) had ZERO reason to use a symbolic number when he told the king of Ammon that they already lived in Israel for 300 years. Everybody knows that Jephthah lived in 1106 BC. 300 years prior to that is 1406 BC. Exactly 40 years after 1446 BC.
This goes perfect with the archeological evidence. The Merneptah Stele, also called the Israel Stele, is an ancient Egyptian inscription dated to around 1208 BC during the reign of Pharaoh Merneptah, the son of Ramses II. It is significant because it contains the earliest known non-biblical reference to "Israel" and is one of the key pieces of evidence regarding the existence of early Israel as a people group.
When you say that the Exodus happened in 1250 BC (late dating) then that means the Israelites entered Canaan in 1210 BC (Just 2 years prior to the Merneptah Stele in 1208 BC). However, there are multiple problems with this theory:
First, the Bible gives ZERO indication that the Egyptians laid waste of Israel just 2 years after they conquered Canaan. None whatsoever.
Second, there are ZERO exegetical reasons to ''symbolize'' the numbers given in 1 Kings 6,1 and Judges 11,26. It's obvious that they are literal figures.
Great evidence against the Biblical story of the Exodus!
The Egyptians were familiar with the concept of death. They knew that first borns did not always survive their parents. This did not come as a shock. So if the King's first born son had died, his second born would naturally become crown prince and no other justification would be needed. If we interpret the so-called Dream Stele as a justification for a second born son to succeed his father, then the most plausible explanation is that the first born son was still alive but impaired, or that there had been strife between them and the second son had come out on top. Neither explanation would support the Biblical narrative.
And to quote Dr. Turek: _"That's what many scholars are saying."_
All archaeological discoveries consistently support the biblical narrative of people, places, and events.
@@annemurphy9339 You said: _"All archaeological discoveries consistently support the biblical narrative of people, places, and events."_
And yet here we have an archaeological discovery that clearly does not. Have you actually read my comment?
There are plenty of archaeological discoveries that support some of the historical data about some of the people, places and events in the Bible, sure. In general, the texts we can corroborate date from after the exilic period. Texts dealing with the patriarchs are generally uncorroborated, or even contain anachronisms, showing they were written or changed centuries later. Most crucially however, we have no corroboration for *_any_* of the supernatural events described in the Bible (or in any other holy book, for that matter). If you disagree, please provide your favorite evidence of this kind, so we can discuss it.
The Biblical narrative has proven and shown many instances of it being true. Especially from archaeologists, even if they are biased, it’s definitely clear and concise.
@@hansdemos6510 Of course, that's why they are miracles. If they could be done so naturally, they wouldn't be miracles, but they will be natural powers. The only logical dilemma here is the existence of God, because it is common sense that a creator can have the power to interfere in creation and therefore affect it unnaturally in a way we call miraculous. But if your worldview is presupposed to the existence of God being a delusion, you are of course going to see all that as a fairytale. So the problem is not the bible, it's you r interpretation of it with respect to the existence of God.
@@wesleyjakesta4095 You said: _"The Biblical narrative has proven and shown many instances of it being true."_
Some things, sure, just like some things in other ancient texts have been corroborated by material evidence. But crucially none of the supernatural claims in the Bible (or in any other texts) has ever been corroborated by for example archaeological evidence.
You said: _"Especially from archaeologists, even if they are biased, it’s definitely clear and concise."_
I don't know why archaeologists would be "biased", but it is clear that no archaeological support for any of the supernatural events described in the Bible or any other text has ever been found. If you disagree, then please provide me with your favorite example so we can discuss it.
Grasping at straws that aren't even there frank.
Finding anything you can to turn people away from the truth so they keep buying your books.
You are foisting your actions on to Frank. You seem jealous Frank has written popular books.
@@chloemartel9927
Well, it's not like randy can write. Just look at it's pathetic comments.
@@gi169 I have just watched a video on the channel 'God's Cottage'. I can't post a link in these sections. The priest talks about many things, but is warning about what we look at and how, little by little, it can lead us places we shouldn't be going.
I don't think we should or need to look at comments from a lot of folk here, many of them are so boringly predictable that they can and should be simply ignored. By responding, we, perhaps unwittingly, inspire them to carry on, our responses feed their 'rush'.
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
This in no way or form indicates anything about any plague.
Good thing it didn’t, because the 10th plague makes the biblical god look pretty bad!
Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
@wanttopreach Moses and tutmose were actually common names amongst Egyptian royalty. I think Ramses xi was the pharaoh of Exodus. His history tells is a rebellion in a Thibus that caused a lot of problems. After his death, Egypt was split into 3 regions for 2 generations. The priests took over one region, probably to erase history. They wouldn't want their own power to be diminished because God proved that he existed. Ramses xi had problems with one of his generals. 2 notes were found from him. One said, "he is the pharaoh of what?" The other have instructions. "Take these two bodies, and lower them into the river. Then say nothing of this." Moses was given the position of general. There are other indications. You have to look into it.
@wanttopreach oh and if you look 400 years before Ramses xi, you'll see that tutmose III sacked Jerusalem, and made a list of the captured slaves, as well as livestock, weapons, and other spoils.
please take that dessicrated american gang sign badge from your hat
Christianity needs Egypt which is why Christianity is always trying to use Egypt for validation. Egypt dont say isht about any biblical mythology. You can go to Egypt and study and see all of the artifacts and not know anything about a Hebrew. This is silly. Its so hard for myths to stand on their own.
No Jospep in made into a god imhotep 3 centuries later and there is a stela with proof on it! Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
Nope. There is evidence that the people were PAID workers though, not slaves.
Wow. Very convincing evidence you gave there. Bravo.
Did they find a paystub?
@sinclairj7492 Maybe an audit turned up some old W2's. 😄
@@sinclairj7492 Basically yes. Papyri: Records from a work gang of 160 men show that they were well fed and treated. The records include logbooks and accounting documents.
Most archaeologists and historians today believe that the pyramids were built by paid laborers, not enslaved people.
Cemeteries: Workers were buried in tombs near the pyramids, with supplies for the afterlife.
Food: Archaeologists found large quantities of meat and fish in a nearby port city, and bread jars in the workers' tombs.
Barracks: Archaeologists found evidence of large barracks for the workers.
Graffiti: Workers left graffiti on buildings, including the names of work gangs, towns, and regions.
@@macmac1022 Nice cut and paste .👍🏻
King tut was the son of akhenaten that was the one who actually made the exodus. 😂😂 nobody spoke of moses for over 500 years. Why do Christians hate truth so much
So you got it wrong in that akhenaten was the so called bastard son of Pharoah and his common wife.King Tut was the son of Tutmoses 3 Royal wife had 9 children, First born son was 5th. He had 8 sisters. He does not complete the reason that Tutmoses 4 had to gain the throne. His oldest Amanhotep 2brother who was in his early 30s when he died was the actual son of the Pharoah and his Royal wife. Tutmoses 4 was the son of Pharaoh and his common law wife. We have a document from another empire from the royal wife saying My son is dead, could you send me one of your sons to be Pharaoh. He never arrived, can you immagine that! Tutmoses 4 had him killed to get the power. So Tutmose 4 became Akanotin and set up monotheistic religion, which the priests overthrew. It was the same style of operation that the Pharasees used against Jesus! Please note that Moses' name also came from TutMoses.
@wanttopreach he was persecuted over the ideologies of divinity thus the need for the exodus. You could even say the arc was present and was removed upon his departure. But for the name sake of moses you are making a long leap of linguistics to justify this name. The fact of the matter is moses was a fictional character, based on a true person that lead a symbolic exodus not physical which an entire nation was formed based upon thinking it was real. But again, not a single nation mentioned anything regarding moses for over 500 years after the dated fact because by then the library of Alexandria was burned and history had a glimmer of time to be manipulated and in essence rewritten. What they failed to realize is that other nations weren't so willing to destroy their history and records as the Greeks were. Much had to be rewritten in order to be passed on. But history is quite literally written in stone before akhenaten and before their empire. History is much deeper than a religion will ever allow you to see. Which is why Greeks attested akhenaten also because the pantheons were all they knew. They couldn't understand there was an actual creator above them. Jesus learned this also which is why he like you mentioned was persecuted in similar to akhenaten. But moses itself was never a living person. He didn't do anything nor invent anything. It was preexisting for at least 1,000 years before his invention
@wanttopreach ps, the epic of gilgamesh is a factual record. It may have its exaggerations as all legends, but the tomb and the main lands have been discovered. I mention this only because the bible be it jewish torah or Christian orthodox, all between, are meant for control and mass submission. You learn our ancestors were more truthful than we are told you'll see how fairytale the bible really is.