Google PhotoScan vs. Flatbed Scanner - How-to and Comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 чер 2018
  • Wondering if Google PhotoScan is comparable to an actual scanner? I take a look in this video using a neat image from the USGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab.
    original image: www.flickr.com/photos/usgsbim...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @DerekBlais
    @DerekBlais 3 роки тому +4

    I got the answer I was looking for. Thank you! However, I will continue to use Photo Scan for scanning old photos that have faded and taken some damage. It's also more practical when doing a whole photo album, because it's possible to get very reasonable quality without taking the photos out from behind the plastic. I would recommend, as you said, to use a proper scanner for professional work or for printing/viewing the originals at much larger sizes.

  • @janX9
    @janX9 4 роки тому +8

    Thank you for this video!
    Please do an update video. Pleeeessssssseeee
    I think Google has improved the light reflection removal algorithm. And cell phone cameras are getting better and better. However, Google has changed the app to add a watermark frame around the picture, but if uploaded to Google Photos the watermark goes away.

  • @tbird81
    @tbird81 2 роки тому +4

    Tldw: Photoscan distorted the ratio, and had shitty resolution, it left reflection in there.
    This guy went pretty easy on Google.

  • @vominator
    @vominator 3 роки тому +3

    CUT TO THE CHASE: messed up ratio a little, real flatbed scanner will have better details and color exactly as expected. Didn't kill all reflections

    • @rigomortisfxstudios
      @rigomortisfxstudios 2 роки тому

      flatbed scanner is the way to go and dont buy the
      the epson ff-680 will put wheel marks on your photos !!!!

  • @AstoundingAmelia
    @AstoundingAmelia 4 роки тому +6

    The use case I see for the photoscan (and the one it's advertised for) is archiving old photos such as those taken on film or those of which you don't have a digital version of, is the flatbed better? Yes but google photoscan is good enough

  • @L2002
    @L2002 5 років тому

    thanks

  • @kyla_09
    @kyla_09 Рік тому

    Hi! Thanks for the information. I know I am a little late to the party. LOL. My question is this:
    After I have completed the transfer of my old photos to my computer, should I delete them all off of the PhotoScan app before I begin to use the app again for a new project?

  • @CLAUSCH
    @CLAUSCH 3 роки тому

    So if I scanning photos from the 60's and 70's to current day... what is the easiest way to capture and sort... and is a professional scanner going to make a difference on these types of photos? They aren't the best resolution to begin with. So any other recommendations for app or scanner? Learning a lot from your videos. Thank you 😊

    • @wiredvibe1678
      @wiredvibe1678 Рік тому +1

      My plan is to scan with phone and fix/enhance with AI

  • @MrGreatsuccess
    @MrGreatsuccess 5 років тому +2

    The Photoscanner has more glare, but the scanned image doesn't have the black tones correct

    • @commandselect1928
      @commandselect1928 5 років тому +1

      I would argue that the scanned image has higher dynamic range, which would allow you to adjust the tones to your preference after the fact.

    • @chrislocust8245
      @chrislocust8245 4 роки тому +1

      @@commandselect1928 too much work

    • @MusikPiratCH
      @MusikPiratCH 3 роки тому

      @@chrislocust8245 It always depends on what you use it for. If you'd like the best possible result for later use you should put in some (hard) work! :D (Then the google photoscan app is probably nothing for high quality archives!)

  • @Balluh.
    @Balluh. Рік тому

    Does the flatbed scanner take up more storage than the app?

  • @JoshuaScott
    @JoshuaScott 3 роки тому +1

    I wonder if the photoscan app would have worked better if you turned on the light option.

    • @MusikPiratCH
      @MusikPiratCH 3 роки тому

      I highly doubt it. With blitz you'll get even more reflections that has to be calculated by the app!

  • @rigomortisfxstudios
    @rigomortisfxstudios Рік тому

    the epson fastscan done one thing that others will not do
    save a digital copy of your photo on your pc

  • @AcasaInNatura
    @AcasaInNatura 6 місяців тому

    If your glossy photos scans come out with newton rings I guess GoogleScan is the only way to go. You never mentioned this kind of problem which is very popular among flatbed scanners.

  • @multimediaproduction6674
    @multimediaproduction6674 2 роки тому +4

    why do you keep looking at your watch, it is off putting

    • @tbird81
      @tbird81 2 роки тому +2

      He clearly has a date.

    • @jiggygino2855
      @jiggygino2855 2 роки тому +1

      As I was watching the video I thought the same thing. Maybe he had some notes he was reading from?
      Either way, looks very bad and unprofessional.
      Plus, he needs a mic.
      All the signs of someone who doesn't do UA-cam for a living....

    • @wiredvibe1678
      @wiredvibe1678 Рік тому +2

      @@jiggygino2855 Jesus tell us how you really feel why don't ya?

  • @williamlaast530
    @williamlaast530 4 роки тому

    *Note, it's a lot better with a smartphone vs lugging around an iPad

    • @MusikPiratCH
      @MusikPiratCH 3 роки тому +2

      If you noticed: It was taken by a smartphone (iphone 8)! The iPad was only used for the google photoscan app demo! xD

  • @RonSnayberger
    @RonSnayberger 5 місяців тому

    Why do you keep looking at your watch. Its very annoying.