Has This Inventor Found A Solution To IED Threats? | Forces TV

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
  • ⚠️ Warning: this video contains graphic simulations of explosions and injury. ⚠️
    Last year, an inventor received a £40,000 accelerator grant this year to further develop technology designed to save lives of those inside vehicles hit by road mines.
    Roger Sloman is using the funding to build on a three-part concept involving carbon fibre beams, a vehicle floor that pulls away from passengers’ feet and a set of inverse rockets.
    In 2020 we went to meet him.
    Subscribe to Forces TV: bit.ly/1OraazC
    Check out our website: forces.net
    Facebook: / forcestv
    Instagram: www.instagram....
    Twitter: / forcesnews
    #Invention #Technology #Innovation

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,1 тис.

  • @rexificationable
    @rexificationable 3 роки тому +2281

    Imagine using the man for content but not linking to his crowd-funding and include URLs to this man in the description

    • @iwasinnamuknow
      @iwasinnamuknow 3 роки тому +148

      That's a pretty crappy way of treating the guy. No reply or justification from Forces TV?

    • @rexificationable
      @rexificationable 3 роки тому +48

      @@hotradremixlx he literally commented saying he crowdfunds

    • @Mike-zu1md
      @Mike-zu1md 3 роки тому +6

      Pretty unfortunate

    • @dominicklittle9828
      @dominicklittle9828 3 роки тому +9

      doesnt appear he needs or would want the attention. hes got darpa money

    • @Sovereign_Citizen_LEO
      @Sovereign_Citizen_LEO 3 роки тому +31

      @@dominicklittle9828 - Why would he "crowdfund" if he has all the money he needs already (from Darpa for instance)?

  • @kenanfurcle786
    @kenanfurcle786 3 роки тому +469

    "let's blow ourselves up in the other direction"
    British barn engineering at it's finest

    • @lumpyfishgravy
      @lumpyfishgravy 3 роки тому +27

      Ever used noise-cancelling headphones? Same thing.

    • @Billfish57
      @Billfish57 3 роки тому +10

      You don't want to blow up, that's the problem, you want to blow down to counter the bomb effect. It's not complicated, it's just expensive.

    • @havennewbowtow8835
      @havennewbowtow8835 3 роки тому +5

      Isn’t it very British, Churchill’s funnies continues.

    • @urukhaai
      @urukhaai 3 роки тому

      i agree, the structure needed for the car to be "uncrushable" would require tons of metal. Otherwise, it will be like when you crush a can of beer between your leg and floor. If you use half of that metal to build an underplate, it will do the same if not better. If you have the control of those 10ms, why not make the car make a small jump reversing those rockets?! :))) add better suspension, eventually a parachute :)))

    • @DarkDonnieMarco
      @DarkDonnieMarco 3 роки тому +3

      Reactive armour plate has been in use for decades.

  • @GriziDaWiz
    @GriziDaWiz 3 роки тому +1487

    “Hey Ron did we just hit a speed bump?”
    “Nah just an IED.”

    • @FeyTheBin
      @FeyTheBin 3 роки тому +24

      Tuesdays

    • @rfishtail_0hmz613
      @rfishtail_0hmz613 3 роки тому +2

      Sure the Explosoin Does'nt MAke The vhicile Fly But The Passengers Turn to Mush

    • @carenthusiast4254
      @carenthusiast4254 3 роки тому +4

      You would hear also see it outside, due to the darkness surrounding windows in air and sound of a very loud bang. Imagine, how scary that be sitting inside the armoured vehicle and can't do nothing.

    • @benscoles3067
      @benscoles3067 3 роки тому +4

      Here is a normal reply..... that was a good one

    • @sultankuto9851
      @sultankuto9851 3 роки тому

      😂😂😂😂😂

  • @uniquelybleak
    @uniquelybleak 3 роки тому +640

    “Only 10 milliseconds to spare? No problem, that’s all I need”

    • @fishsticks8198
      @fishsticks8198 3 роки тому +14

      it better be all you need because military technology kills faster and faster every year

    • @uniquelybleak
      @uniquelybleak 3 роки тому +3

      @@fishsticks8198 Exactly haha. One day it will be 1 millisecond

    • @blooiefps9304
      @blooiefps9304 3 роки тому +4

      @@uniquelybleak not exactly. there is a limit to physics and how far technology can push that. fighting against basically gorilla warfare units won't have this at their disposal. therefor these simple bombs will always have a point of where nothing happens

    • @Meeminator
      @Meeminator 3 роки тому +5

      @@blooiefps9304 Agreed. Improvised explosives are cheap and kill quickly. More advanced weaponry may kill more quickly but will certainly not be nearly as cheap.

    • @HBC423
      @HBC423 3 роки тому +4

      That’s what I told her

  • @Jc50gt
    @Jc50gt 3 роки тому +1491

    “It’s just physics”. What a man

    • @ancientbear3280
      @ancientbear3280 3 роки тому +12

      The doors burst open on the explosion. Imagine a mans head in that explosion. Half the solution. The other half is force redirection.

    • @ulfenburg7539
      @ulfenburg7539 3 роки тому +1

      Dit profil billede tilhører nu DANMARK

    • @TheAcujlGamer
      @TheAcujlGamer 3 роки тому +3

      "It's inevitable"

    • @civiere
      @civiere 3 роки тому +1

      .2 seconds after i aswered her question... cause it just is. Dont get me wrong, brilliant idea. Fragilr, but brilliant. Never been to war but i can understand a soldier trusting a big armoured v shape more then a bunch of gizmos. Specially in desert or tropics. But it is just physics, counter acting the force applied to the vehicle. Basic enginering 👌. Why didnt i come up with something like this!? Have to say was suprised about the rocket on the roof though. Sturdy vehicle.

    • @marcusholloway1147
      @marcusholloway1147 3 роки тому

      OK one question how often can you use this anti mine system

  • @vinsderiz
    @vinsderiz 3 роки тому +1263

    Soldiers and flesh win battles, engineering and logistics win wars. Bless this man.

    • @cascadianapplications7124
      @cascadianapplications7124 3 роки тому +18

      Great quote

    • @wakcedout
      @wakcedout 3 роки тому +15

      War has always been a battle between weaponsmiths and armorers.
      A back and forth of a deadly ballet.

    • @godandguns808
      @godandguns808 3 роки тому +1

      U do realize that all that has to be done to bipass his system is to use a shaped charge/ tandem shaped charge

    • @equiaux
      @equiaux 3 роки тому +1

      Respect ❤️

    • @godandguns808
      @godandguns808 3 роки тому +3

      @James Taylor dark times ahead

  • @thelongdarkteatimeofthesou4497
    @thelongdarkteatimeofthesou4497 3 роки тому +565

    This man is a testament to British engineering ingenuity.

    • @allothernamesbutthis
      @allothernamesbutthis 3 роки тому +9

      sounds like he lives to work.

    • @paulwacker9259
      @paulwacker9259 3 роки тому +4

      Love such inventions this man is very impressive !

    • @thoryon7767
      @thoryon7767 3 роки тому +2

      You spelled it wrong, its "Bri'ish"

    • @93tiny08
      @93tiny08 3 роки тому +14

      @@detroit8092 'clever, original or inventive' this guy is literally the definition of ingenuity. Jog on Boris

    • @Inquisitor_Vex
      @Inquisitor_Vex 3 роки тому

      And tinkering in your shed!

  • @LaughLounge11
    @LaughLounge11 3 роки тому +407

    "did we just get hit by an ied?"
    "idk mate, must have been a bump"

    • @Matwahish
      @Matwahish 3 роки тому +6

      Actually the conversation usually goes:AHHHHHHHHH MY LEGS

    • @ianmontgomery7534
      @ianmontgomery7534 3 роки тому +1

      wouldn't the explosion burst your eardrums?

    • @LaughLounge11
      @LaughLounge11 3 роки тому +2

      @@ianmontgomery7534 prolly going to be loud, but not to that point.

    • @ianmontgomery7534
      @ianmontgomery7534 3 роки тому

      @@LaughLounge11 That surprises me. Do they wear headphones at all in these vehicles for comms purposes. maybe that would stop the pressure.

    • @LaughLounge11
      @LaughLounge11 3 роки тому +2

      @@ianmontgomery7534 i doubt everyone wear headsets, headphones of some sort but i think they do have a headset inside the vehicle for the radio (for long distance calls i think, mainly for intel and support) and use a walkie talkie for everyone in a firefight. i'm explaing in a logical way and that's all i could think of.

  • @Justin-cn9hq
    @Justin-cn9hq 3 роки тому +124

    Many of my friends would be alive today if this technology had existed 10 years ago.

    • @fvo911
      @fvo911 3 роки тому +7

      If not the politics... they would have not not to been sent there...

    • @TheBenchPressMan
      @TheBenchPressMan 3 роки тому +5

      this unfortunatly is the issue, the ground war against militant islam is over now, we've left so this technology is for a war we already lost.
      This wont help against China

    • @vejet
      @vejet 3 роки тому +9

      @@TheBenchPressMan lol you actually think we've seen the last of IED's?

    • @nw7654
      @nw7654 3 роки тому +3

      They’d be alive for sure if we stopped creating fake wars and left people alone

    • @jakemon4550
      @jakemon4550 3 роки тому +1

      @@nw7654 ugg another 911 denier, go back to 4 chan man

  • @rwappersonal
    @rwappersonal 3 роки тому +31

    Thanks to everyone who has expressed support and raised some useful discussion points as a result of this interview from Forces TV. We were happy to have provided the video and an overview of our ground vehicle protection solution which will hopefully soon start to save lives and reduce casualties both amongst the armed forces and civilians whom have to work in the many areas around the world which have been decimated by war in the past.
    If you wish to be a part of this technology moving forward, then we have now launched a fund-raising campaign on Seedrs and there is more information and videos on our own ABBS channel.

  • @thomasdobis6855
    @thomasdobis6855 3 роки тому +35

    Sir,
    First, I must say I do believe your invention deserves a medal, as it will save lives of our military personnel. Secondly, for you to spend most of those retired days for the betterment of mankind deserves nothing less than an honor of the highest degree.
    Thank you.

  • @michaelgriffiths5723
    @michaelgriffiths5723 3 роки тому +419

    If the UK government gave every man a shed I think we would already have a colony on Mars!

    • @newton18311
      @newton18311 3 роки тому +11

      That's what Britain is good at, But never seem to patient anything.

    • @cowboy4378
      @cowboy4378 3 роки тому +15

      Everything good in this world was built by a British man in his shed. Including the batmobile.

    • @tangomike15
      @tangomike15 3 роки тому +9

      Today’s men would, for the most part, turn their sheds into cannabis factories.

    • @tangomike15
      @tangomike15 3 роки тому +8

      @Michael Lake hey why not. We could make all the aliens high and colonise their planet right under their little green noses!

    • @pebo8306
      @pebo8306 3 роки тому

      @@tangomike15 Nope!CRACK!

  • @glornporklongton7338
    @glornporklongton7338 3 роки тому +413

    Almost like reactive armour,in a sense, using counteracting forces to null each out, I imagine the thumbs down are Al Qeada lurkers

    • @zacklastname2362
      @zacklastname2362 3 роки тому +18

      Im not a terrorist for disliking and that makes no sense. More like thumbs down because I do not believe it works. the doors are blown open and the test dummies are not present in his demonstrations+ more.
      Almost guaranteed those soldiers are dead, if not from the blast wave directed into the floor then through the occupants then the heatwave and other forces and I 100% promise the way that force is directed they are hurting. This is also based on the idea that there wouldnt be multiple IEDs they would be facing, and further, this may allow for any penetrating rounds (like rpgs) into the body of the vehicle to get captured more easily thus presenting more danger to the soldiers aboard.
      The only thing I hate more than those trying to kill our soldiers in these scenarios- is snake oil salesman-inventors.

    • @scoobysnacc2292
      @scoobysnacc2292 3 роки тому +41

      @@zacklastname2362 you have to understand its not promised to save their lives. What hes trying to do is stop the vehicle from being tipped over, or the bottom from caving. Thats what kills most often.

    • @CrazyDutchguys
      @CrazyDutchguys 3 роки тому +29

      @@zacklastname2362 dont forget these are just initial prototypes. They will be much more development

    • @glornporklongton7338
      @glornporklongton7338 3 роки тому +55

      @@zacklastname2362 I think the term snake oil salesman is completely unwarranted, it’s clear the man has devoted his professional life to this sort of thing, hardly a flyby nighter. You can disagree with his theory, don’t insult the man, he has clearly earned his Spurs.

    • @zacklastname2362
      @zacklastname2362 3 роки тому +5

      All good points I suppose, but it's annoying reading the first point name calling people who disagree a terrorist. Because anyone who disagrees is a terrorist? What? What even is that logic?

  • @claudesmoot1880
    @claudesmoot1880 3 роки тому +88

    Soldier 1: this truck is bomb proof!
    Soldier 2: really how?
    Soldier 1: it's got bombs all over it!
    Soldier 2: 😳

    • @ivan_says_hi
      @ivan_says_hi 3 роки тому +4

      Nothing like taking a drive in a car with literal solid fuel rockets strapped to the roof right over your head 👌

  • @28russ
    @28russ 3 роки тому +48

    Genius! He just took the meaning of "fight fire with fire" to another level.

    • @anonydun82fgoog35
      @anonydun82fgoog35 3 роки тому +1

      meh, he is basically re-inventing reactive armor

    • @V0YAG3R
      @V0YAG3R 3 роки тому +1

      Anonydun 82fgoog nope, you tried! 👌🏻

  • @beckster181
    @beckster181 3 роки тому +103

    As an ex soldier that had to live with this possibility at times this is a god send and would do more to make the diggers lives safer than any amount of armour or sniffer dogs when moving from place to place the SAS etc would love this little trick added to their vehicles especially even if it is only a one time escape it can be refitted each time and if it saved o9bne life or prevented one serious injury it would be worth its cost

    • @otablott7779
      @otablott7779 3 роки тому +2

      Really, didn't the diggers murder defenceless villagers in Afghanistan?

    • @Sectormann
      @Sectormann 3 роки тому +9

      @@otablott7779 They are in a war where the enemy is hiding among civilians, also if they shot just to murder innocents, why would they later save several Villagers who were wounded in the raid? I think it must have been a mistake caused by the chaos.

    • @Mikha_el
      @Mikha_el 3 роки тому

      Rubbish.

    • @ticalwoodhouse8568
      @ticalwoodhouse8568 3 роки тому

      just following orders

    • @seanbailey8545
      @seanbailey8545 3 роки тому +1

      Sadly the MOD are super slow at adopting new tech so we might see something similar in 3020.

  • @shadow-Sun
    @shadow-Sun 3 роки тому +284

    Thank God for British men in sheds doing the world a service with their inventions that nobody ever backs ...until these shed heroes prove them wrong !

    • @alfielowe8215
      @alfielowe8215 3 роки тому +18

      Exact same thing happened with the Accuracy International Sniper rifles, built by a couple of british lads in a shed, Now they’re army standard issue for snipers and are regarded as some of the best and most accurate military rifles made!

    • @tomburnes6356
      @tomburnes6356 3 роки тому +1

      @@alfielowe8215 So anybody can make a Gun in their shed in the UK.

    • @tomburnes6356
      @tomburnes6356 3 роки тому +2

      Thank God for all the people of the world in their sheds, not just the brits

    • @shadow-Sun
      @shadow-Sun 3 роки тому +10

      @@tomburnes6356 granted- but Brits are especially known over centuries as "inventors" and shed boffins .

    • @tomburnes6356
      @tomburnes6356 3 роки тому +1

      @@shadow-Sun yeah fair enough bro, have invented a lot tbh.

  • @dannyfitz409
    @dannyfitz409 3 роки тому +24

    As a survivor from a direct IED hit in my WMIK land rover in 09 thanks to the V shape armour saved my crew and myself, the snatchers had no place in Helmand they were called coffins on wheels unfortunately we lost quite a few lads who were in these types. It's amazing to have this gentleman putting his life's skills so we can be protected when deployed. Well done you 🇬🇧

  • @civiSapper
    @civiSapper 3 роки тому +21

    BRAVO!!! I was hit several times in 2007 in iraq and 2010 in Afghanistan. So i can only say keep developing.

  • @markwatters6875
    @markwatters6875 3 роки тому +146

    Sir, as a veteran I must say “Thank you”. Please keep your research/development going. All the best from Australia

    • @yaboy8846
      @yaboy8846 3 роки тому +3

      @@ulfenburg7539 Aren't you edgy

    • @ulfenburg7539
      @ulfenburg7539 3 роки тому

      @@yaboy8846 how am i edgy? im asking him how he be doing because of the massive scandal that is called Australia's war crimes

    • @stephenhawkingsbeautywheel9080
      @stephenhawkingsbeautywheel9080 3 роки тому

      @@ulfenburg7539 Because generalization is always a got thing, eh?

    • @ulfenburg7539
      @ulfenburg7539 3 роки тому

      @@stephenhawkingsbeautywheel9080 Yeah maybe i went a bit too far

    • @tastycookiechip
      @tastycookiechip 3 роки тому +1

      @@ulfenburg7539 Australian war crimes are nothing compared to what our enemies have done so we can give them a pass

  • @simongough7970
    @simongough7970 3 роки тому +347

    A good bit of British "boffinery".

    • @joecat4892
      @joecat4892 3 роки тому +5

      fantastic idea ... but not invincible. ... makes the enemy have to work harder anyway as far as I can see... which obviously is good.... harder they have to work, more likely they will be detected ... more resources they must use ... more likely it will go wrong (their plans).

    • @Cookdog987
      @Cookdog987 3 роки тому +1

      😂

    • @charlestellis7021
      @charlestellis7021 3 роки тому +2

      Sorry, afraid not, see my comment regarding the "v" shape was introduced by the S.A. military during the 1970's, not new 😊

    • @inclusiveschool9224
      @inclusiveschool9224 3 роки тому

      😂

    • @montyburdfield8980
      @montyburdfield8980 3 роки тому +8

      @@charlestellis7021 this has nothing to do with a V shaped hull.....

  • @NautilusGoose
    @NautilusGoose 3 роки тому +353

    Inventor: we think we have invented a way to survive an explosion.
    Reporter: How?
    Inventor: *we add a second explosion*

    • @niklasb.6707
      @niklasb.6707 3 роки тому +11

      Thats how ERA Works for tanks since 1960 ^^

    • @Trve_Kvlt
      @Trve_Kvlt 3 роки тому +1

      @@niklasb.6707 Until the advent of Tandem HEAT and top attack missiles, at least

    • @axlfrhalo
      @axlfrhalo 3 роки тому +4

      @@Trve_Kvlt no ERA still prevents Tandem with YET another explosion, (modern ERA does)

    • @Trve_Kvlt
      @Trve_Kvlt 3 роки тому

      @@axlfrhalo Sure, modern ERA. But there is modern ATGMs that can defeat even the best ERA, such as Kontakt-5

    • @axlfrhalo
      @axlfrhalo 3 роки тому +5

      ​@@Trve_Kvlt yeah but you said tandem stops ERA and i said modern ERA stops tandem as in, it negates the intended effect tandem has.
      Now whether the main charge still manages to penetrate the tank after the ERA has done its thing is another topic.

  • @nicktasteless360
    @nicktasteless360 3 роки тому +67

    when trying something nobody has ever done before, nobody will believe in you but yourself.

    • @RENO_K
      @RENO_K 3 роки тому +2

      At first thought about rocket motors when he said the car would get thrown up in the air, but thought it was dumb, ineffective, single use, would not activate up in time, expensive, the floor would buckle instead, I was wrong
      But what are you going to do about the shockwave hitting the personnel's ears

    • @jonathonhebert7042
      @jonathonhebert7042 3 роки тому +1

      ​@@RENO_K In an ideal world, they'd be wearing hearing protection that could minimize the damage. If the vehicle doors and stuff could be sealed well enough, it might be possible to dampen the sound greatly also.

    • @adamrodgers9175
      @adamrodgers9175 3 роки тому

      It's honestly just not practical to produce. The military has many inventions they have funded and not funded that didn't make it...it's not practical to produce this invention yet. The guy is onto something..but it needs to change a bit. Be a shame this guy goes his whole life pushing one thing that never flys.

    • @mrdrummer2564
      @mrdrummer2564 3 роки тому

      @@RENO_K Considering the statement made about people drowning, that tells me people already survived the initial explosion.
      This is not about eliminating a threat, it's about reducing it, and mitigating factors that can be.

    • @anonydun82fgoog35
      @anonydun82fgoog35 3 роки тому

      Then again never be so arrogant as to believe that you invented something unique. Others probably got there first, just the time wasn't right or they were not successful in finding a market. But there's a reason so many Nobel science prizes are shared. Heck even Nylon is named as it is because it was invented in New York and London at the same time :)

  • @NiSiochainGanSaoirse
    @NiSiochainGanSaoirse 3 роки тому +1

    Beung from the North of Ireland, which is a place intimately familiar with explosions, I thought the man was a raving lunatic when he said that a land rover could be made to withstand huge I.E.Ds without a fundamental overhaul of the entire design.
    Blast physics are incredibly complex, however this fine man tries to say otherwise, and to come up with the materials and products which could save countless lives through such a magnificent applications of science is amongst the most noble of ventures.
    God bless this man.

  • @SilenceOnPS4
    @SilenceOnPS4 3 роки тому +357

    Glad he's british. We need more like him!
    Edit: Simple but brilliant.

    • @VanderlyndenJengold
      @VanderlyndenJengold 3 роки тому +4

      Didn't you catch the end? He's working for the Americans. They've got the money.

    • @mr_slidey
      @mr_slidey 3 роки тому +11

      @@VanderlyndenJengold The initial contract for the moving floor was for the MOD. The Americans are investing more in the development of the rockets.

    • @VanderlyndenJengold
      @VanderlyndenJengold 3 роки тому +5

      @@mr_slidey If they pay for the research they'll want rights and, if the UK wants to use it, we'd have to license the rocket technology. His is a private company. It is looking to set up a manufacturing facility in the Middle East. His nationality is immaterial. Cobham was sold of to a USA company despite UK national security concerns: it's a global market, the UK govt OK'd the sale.

    • @siouneo152
      @siouneo152 3 роки тому +1

      You don't need more like him, There's enough like him.

    • @thehammer7711
      @thehammer7711 3 роки тому +1

      @@VanderlyndenJengold Chobham wasn’t sold to the USA they licence it, and use the older stuff.

  • @RJM1011
    @RJM1011 3 роки тому +39

    One of my Cpl's from 63 Sqn SAS was killed in a Land Rover because of an IED mine. So a BIG thank you to this inventor for coming up with this that could save lives in the future. THANK YOU and thumbs UP.

    • @rogersloman6635
      @rogersloman6635 3 роки тому +4

      Richard It's a pity the SAS has so far shown no interest in this, as there are other more important current threats they are concerned about. Roger.

    • @RJM1011
      @RJM1011 3 роки тому +1

      @@rogersloman6635 Thank you I don't know I left my Sqn in 2004. Thank you again. :)

  • @JamBoomerach
    @JamBoomerach 3 роки тому +41

    He looks very pleased with himself, as he should be.

  • @manmeetworld
    @manmeetworld 3 роки тому +14

    "It's just pure physics." Lots of intellectual integrity too.

  • @kblskables2877
    @kblskables2877 3 роки тому +27

    Who would have thought fighting fire with more fire was the actual correct answer...

  • @errickmackey8983
    @errickmackey8983 3 роки тому +70

    The American military complex need to get in touch with this Genius, his invention will save lives. 👍👍

    • @failtolawl
      @failtolawl 3 роки тому +4

      america has already made ied and rpg reduced light vehicles

    • @its-me-here
      @its-me-here 3 роки тому +6

      The US has already invested as per the end of the video. But I don't know if that's the military or the military industrial complex, aka businesses.

    • @hardwirecars
      @hardwirecars 3 роки тому

      @@its-me-here dod is department of defence so the military.

    • @magmafang7187
      @magmafang7187 3 роки тому +1

      Stay. Away from our research

    • @kevindonnelly3399
      @kevindonnelly3399 3 роки тому +4

      Stop starting war. that saves lives!!!

  • @marillomontano6604
    @marillomontano6604 3 роки тому +93

    Having seen a *Land Rover* being thrown in the air after detonating an IED makes me nervous. It's enought to completely change my mindset on how dangerous IED's are.

    • @Retrosicotte
      @Retrosicotte 3 роки тому +24

      I've seen footage of things many times larger than a Land Rover hurled into the air. There's footage of a 60 ton M1 Abrams being thrown 10-15 feet upwards by one. IEDs are nasty things, not just toe poppers, can put any amount of HE wherever you wish really.

    • @marillomontano6604
      @marillomontano6604 3 роки тому +5

      @@Retrosicotte Oh my! an M1 Abrams? Asymetric warfare is really a nasty business.

    • @jarradk174
      @jarradk174 3 роки тому +6

      There's a reason they were pulled out of afghan and the MOD tried to cover up just how useless the Land rovers were.

    • @stevenbreach2561
      @stevenbreach2561 3 роки тому +8

      But would the crew survive?Not much point if not,Land Rovers are ten a penny,crew,not so

    • @maxpowerii7368
      @maxpowerii7368 3 роки тому +11

      @@jarradk174 land rovers aren’t completely useless, like all military equipment they have an specific application or purpose.
      Fighting asymmetrical warfare against insurgents who are a fan of boom boom rather bang bang is however correctly not one of those for a Land Rover WMIK.
      The failure on the part of the government at the time was not to get Warrior AFVs in quickly enough once it became apparent the stand up fighting tactics had changed to IED campaigns.

  • @keithpeter2267
    @keithpeter2267 3 роки тому +15

    Good luck Roger with your research, keep up the good work. 🇬🇧

  • @JohnnyForehead
    @JohnnyForehead 3 роки тому +5

    I tried this using Estes model rocket engines. My first volunteer didn't fair so well. I'm going to miss you mom.

  • @JohnSmith-co8yp
    @JohnSmith-co8yp 3 роки тому +46

    This man is the embodiment of the fact that every problem has a solution.

  • @holdmybleach2651
    @holdmybleach2651 3 роки тому +16

    A bloke, a shed, and retirement.

  • @siouneo152
    @siouneo152 3 роки тому +30

    Let me guess, The British are gonna be happy that the guy who came up with this idea is British

    • @sideshowbob5237
      @sideshowbob5237 3 роки тому +6

      What's wrong with that? (Small "t" after comma: "the British ----")

    • @siouneo152
      @siouneo152 3 роки тому +4

      @@sideshowbob5237Nothing is wrong with that, Is just that British people are making too many good stuff that I'm getting jealous

    • @DoughnutsInspace
      @DoughnutsInspace 3 роки тому +3

      I think you will find that that that the UK has invented a lot more than you think. Just because we are a small island doesn't mean we are incapable of inventing and building and it's been that why for centuries. Maybe you need to do some research and stop being close minded and brainwashed by you society?

    • @siouneo152
      @siouneo152 3 роки тому +1

      @@DoughnutsInspace Small island!? Sorry sir but my country is 2 times smaller than your mainland.

    • @siouneo152
      @siouneo152 3 роки тому

      @Garry Nevill How

  • @Truth_Hurts528
    @Truth_Hurts528 3 роки тому +6

    "Warning: this video contains graphic simulations of explosions and injury." lol at the UK's woke military

  • @bm_videa
    @bm_videa 3 роки тому +1

    Looks quite amazing. Just shows that if you have an inteligent person and are able to invest time and get an out of box view, what could be the results. The slo mo and high speed videos really provide you with a perspective to see patterns otherwise hidden.

  • @johnnytyler5685
    @johnnytyler5685 3 роки тому +3

    This is incredible technology, but I gotta say...if I run over an IED, I'd much, much, much, MUCH rather be in a JLTV than in a Land Rover or a Humvee with a few carbon fiber floor beams and some rockets strapped to the hood, roof and rear bumper.

  • @dovidell
    @dovidell 3 роки тому +9

    The genius that bought "us" the D DAY funnies , is alive and well in the 21st century - time to give a gong to a WORTHY recipient

  • @clacicle
    @clacicle 3 роки тому +47

    He reminds me a bit of that WW2 fellow who invented the “funnies”.

    • @aj9675
      @aj9675 3 роки тому +6

      That would be Percy Hobart

    • @rogerhowell6269
      @rogerhowell6269 3 роки тому +4

      Major General Percy Hobart another brilliant military inventor. 👍

    • @alf3071
      @alf3071 3 роки тому

      what are those?

    • @spazmonkey2131
      @spazmonkey2131 3 роки тому

      @@alf3071 the bobbin, the crab, and a few others

  • @nobbytang
    @nobbytang 3 роки тому +43

    Keep production in the UK and sell to everyone!!!

    • @rambo-cambo3581
      @rambo-cambo3581 3 роки тому +1

      He's doing this with the Americans - watch the video

    • @BAZZAROU812
      @BAZZAROU812 3 роки тому +4

      Americans are funding the project..

    • @hardwirecars
      @hardwirecars 3 роки тому

      @@BAZZAROU812 but dont worry yall get to keep your free medical while america pays the bill.

    • @chiefdoesgaming8269
      @chiefdoesgaming8269 3 роки тому +4

      @@hardwirecars what now?

    • @srs6461
      @srs6461 3 роки тому

      Get rid of unions

  • @ricbarker4829
    @ricbarker4829 3 роки тому +14

    The only problem is that once a system like this rolls out, the enemy will find a way to defeat it, such as a small charge that will activate the rockets, followed by the main charge once the rockets have already gone off.

    • @patrikkarrman4323
      @patrikkarrman4323 3 роки тому +3

      Yes or just stop using normal charges and start using shaped charges that blasts a hole in the belly plate and kills the passengers inside.

    • @witkocaster
      @witkocaster 3 роки тому

      Perhaps it should be top-secret. Once the concept is known to the potential enemy it is possible to defeat it.

    • @TheMegaPingasMobile
      @TheMegaPingasMobile 3 роки тому +5

      @@witkocaster stops being top secret once they see a car survive the explosion anyways. There will always be someone observing what is happening

    • @witkocaster
      @witkocaster 3 роки тому +1

      @@TheMegaPingasMobile If they have high speed camera...

    • @TheMegaPingasMobile
      @TheMegaPingasMobile 3 роки тому

      @@witkocaster I think an insurgent can determine that if the car and/or crew keeps moving after the explosion and the car didn't flip, something is going on.

  • @rivalrepairs
    @rivalrepairs 3 роки тому

    Great work. Just shows how defining the problem accurately is half the battle. Some great solutions.

  • @mrpusser0348
    @mrpusser0348 3 роки тому +23

    love the two 'experts' below telling him hes wrong.
    It will come up against a practicallity vs protection issue in the future but the concept seems sound

  • @davidbranney3924
    @davidbranney3924 3 роки тому +10

    Well done sir. Now let's get DSTl and DE&S involved and get this protection onto our vehicles.

  • @jamesmcstein6758
    @jamesmcstein6758 3 роки тому +40

    British inavation & top quality engineering.
    One man in his shed.
    Jobeth Doneth.
    Well done Roger 👍 🇬🇧

  • @wezab
    @wezab 3 роки тому +6

    The biggest problem with any original thought is that people in charge aren't capable of it and your first real challenge is convincing them to go forward with it.

  • @ronnormson
    @ronnormson 3 роки тому +4

    Quite an invention for saving our troops lives. I hope that he is able to develop this system. Real game changer. So many troops are seriously scarred for life when encountering IED's. Best wishes!!

  • @michaelguerin56
    @michaelguerin56 3 роки тому +8

    Great work. Good to have someone going back to basics and really thinking through a solution.

  • @MASTERJJ1995
    @MASTERJJ1995 3 роки тому +8

    1:57 That's just cheating because we all know the Toyota Hilux is indestructible.

  • @tommynorthwood
    @tommynorthwood 3 роки тому +7

    Finally Q won't have to ask Bond to please bring it back in one piece😂

  • @elvis9195
    @elvis9195 3 роки тому +1

    As someone who has seen the effects of an IED, if this is implemented and saves lives, then this man truly deserves all the accolades and at least a knighthood! Also make sure it's patented and make some brass out of it.

  • @wuffothewonderdog
    @wuffothewonderdog 3 роки тому

    The Rhodesian army dealt with IEDs by developing a vehicle they called, I believe, a Rhino. It had a V-shaped bottom high off the ground, and the interior had a lining of conveyor belting, loosely secured to catch shrapnel flying around inside the vehicle.

  • @rokhnroll
    @rokhnroll 3 роки тому +6

    Never underestimate the power of the Shed. Just watched another British inventor who has invented an engine that runs on air for fuel !

    • @johnk5735
      @johnk5735 3 роки тому

      Where did you see the video

    • @alis4328
      @alis4328 3 роки тому +3

      You may want to learn about thermodynamics, system efficiency and potential energy. There's a lot of hoax vids out there about perpetual motion machines and what not. Once you're armed with the knowledge of physics you'd be able to spot them immediately.

  • @charlestellis7021
    @charlestellis7021 3 роки тому +34

    The "V" shape was first introduced by the South African military during the 1970's!

    • @TheLadsft.TheWorld
      @TheLadsft.TheWorld 3 роки тому +3

      yup, those boers know what they was doing

    • @OscarD001
      @OscarD001 3 роки тому +2

      Thank you Charles. Was about to mention it as well. Everyone on here make it sound like it is something new.

    • @rogersloman6635
      @rogersloman6635 3 роки тому +5

      @@OscarD001 The active counteraction of the mine blast forces certainly is new!

    • @OscarD001
      @OscarD001 3 роки тому +2

      @@rogersloman6635 do you have anything to prove this mate?

    • @morerightrudder9742
      @morerightrudder9742 3 роки тому +5

      @@OscarD001 Do you have anything to disprove his statement?

  • @toddcote4904
    @toddcote4904 3 роки тому +6

    How do you stop a truck from blowing up?
    Blow it down!

    • @R.U.1.2.
      @R.U.1.2. 3 роки тому

      Read More.
      Read More.

  • @rogersloman6635
    @rogersloman6635 3 роки тому +8

    Hi Everyone who still looks at this, I'm just curious to see if anyone has actually invested through the Seedrs pitch? It would be useful to know. Roger.

    • @homijbhabha8860
      @homijbhabha8860 3 роки тому

      I have a question sir, would this be able to counter say a 100kg mine?

    • @rogersloman6635
      @rogersloman6635 3 роки тому

      @@homijbhabha8860 It is possible, just add more motors and make sure the belly plate can take the loads.
      Roger Sloman

    • @fookkeongyip8941
      @fookkeongyip8941 3 роки тому

      Roger, are you still crowd funding? If you are, where can I find your crowd funding?
      Keong Yip.

  • @maxwellboop
    @maxwellboop 3 роки тому +4

    My Brain hurts literally, that was a very old concept that was tested back in 1960’s that discovered that explosives without a physical projectile can’t do well against curved surfaces cuz of the force dispersement cuz the lower curve with be mostly the thickest part so it doesn’t collapse in and the force would push to the sides were it will also push the force from the another two sides out, changing the direction from up/90 to 50 or 45 out wards of the car or even a boat but the can’t handle it cuz boats can’t be heavy so it can float and the water will act as a flat surface if anything explodes under it, back to land vehicles, and why did the US didn’t use this idea if it was affective? Cuz there apc’s are not designed to have the curve under plate for it, so they need to change a lot of things just to add that/waste money from the MBT programs, so it was canceled, but after years NOW they rediscovered it and it only took 50+ years!

  • @renrifle
    @renrifle 3 роки тому +14

    IED: I kill by going boom upwards
    Some British guy: Ok so I made something that’ll go boom but downwards
    IED:

    • @anonydun82fgoog35
      @anonydun82fgoog35 3 роки тому

      shaped charge from anti-tank hand grenade flying over vehicle: Oh hai - where's your god now? When you want it dead there's ALWAYS some way to kill it. We humans are sneaky like that.

  • @robfer5370
    @robfer5370 3 роки тому +7

    "It's just pure physics" :D well done sir i couldn't have said it better myself.

    • @Pyriphlegeton
      @Pyriphlegeton 3 роки тому

      *"couldn't have", not "couldn't of" :)

  • @MrWeedWacky
    @MrWeedWacky 3 роки тому +27

    This guy: "All you gotta do is make an equal and opposite reaction hit the force!"
    Everyone else "It can't be doine!"
    Newton "Eh?"

  • @theodorebear6714
    @theodorebear6714 3 роки тому

    Trigger mechanism attached and timed by the floor protector?
    Could work.
    It's not like the floor reinforcement can be shaped and built out of any sheet metal.
    Carbon fiber would cut down on mass though.

  • @markwilliford4567
    @markwilliford4567 3 роки тому +4

    The Brits - always inventing innovative and creative weapons of war - just as civilized man should do!

  • @niccadoodles
    @niccadoodles 3 роки тому +21

    Original: Dead
    Invention: Slightly less dead

  • @gabrielgalaxygh
    @gabrielgalaxygh 3 роки тому +17

    That fact that they need a warning for dummies exploding shows how soft everyone is now

    • @anonydun82fgoog35
      @anonydun82fgoog35 3 роки тому +1

      well it makes sense that dummies would get offended at pictures of exploding dummies...

    • @sanitoeter69
      @sanitoeter69 3 роки тому +3

      nah could be survivours watching this who might get triggered or sth

  • @adambransbury
    @adambransbury 3 роки тому +7

    Many things have been solved by a british bloke in a shed!

  • @BACKpackSouthWest
    @BACKpackSouthWest 3 роки тому +5

    Thank the good Lord for giving people like this man the intelligence, stamina, conviction, and wisdom to make the seemingly impossible, possible. Thank you, sir! God speed.

  • @truthkeeperfilms
    @truthkeeperfilms 3 роки тому +2

    The best preventative measures is not invading their countries with stupid pointless wars? That's the BEST defense.

    • @markroeder2491
      @markroeder2491 3 роки тому +2

      And then they come to you and start leveling your buildings, because someone killed someone hundreds of years ago. Get real.

  • @jaccon6106
    @jaccon6106 3 роки тому +5

    Great video love to hear more from this bloke

  • @Saint_Vincent1735
    @Saint_Vincent1735 3 роки тому +16

    Why does it take some gentleman like this ( no disrespect) to invent this. Haven't we got experts working 24/7 on how we keep are men and women as safe as possible

    • @NitroNuggetTV
      @NitroNuggetTV 3 роки тому +2

      sometimes its difficult to think of outside of the box solutions when you have budget and management constraints. A huge amount of military development comes from private companies and single individuals rather then government/MOD groups. Also you could say this gentleman is the expert since he's leading in this segment, and the gov just buy/invest in his product.

    • @Alucard-gt1zf
      @Alucard-gt1zf 3 роки тому +1

      Inspiration isn't something money can buy

    • @Saint_Vincent1735
      @Saint_Vincent1735 3 роки тому

      @@Alucard-gt1zf honestly your completely correct I find it disappointing whose job it was to defeat these IED devices didn't come up with something like this. It almost looks like explosive reactive armour but for under the vehicle. Our men and women are our most precious resource and our armed forces aren't huge, every one of our personnel should know we've given them tools to do the job.

    • @NitroNuggetTV
      @NitroNuggetTV 3 роки тому +1

      @@Saint_Vincent1735 You're not wrong, but the efforts to protect our soldiers has been strong, its just the approach chosen has just been different from this solution. The development of entirely new vehicles has been funded and has been effective in protecting its occupants. V-shaped hulls, blast seats and high ground clearance have been proven to work in combat. No one has been ignoring or downplaying the threat of IED's, hence the transition from unarmoured land rovers to specially designed armoured vehicles in recent years

    • @ProGamingKieran
      @ProGamingKieran 3 роки тому

      @Adam Noble i wouldn't think budget is the main problem considering the USA has a military budget of 600 Billion dollars a year 7 million doesn't sound too bad. I know we're talking about the UK but I believe if this was as good as its made out to be they would of had designs already made and prototyped.

  • @camsmith6034
    @camsmith6034 3 роки тому +5

    Give him a medal

  • @efone3553
    @efone3553 3 роки тому

    that is just awesome! We gotta get this tech ready and deployed asap

  • @Daniel08353
    @Daniel08353 3 роки тому +7

    “It’s just, pure, physics.” 👌🏼

    • @hagestad
      @hagestad 3 роки тому

      nope its fake. how is there 10ms for reaction? Math does not add up. Those are supersonic. So there will be more like 3s or less.

    • @e711x4
      @e711x4 3 роки тому

      Ya, you know how shrapnel's work right

  • @gringotom242
    @gringotom242 3 роки тому +7

    Well done Roger!

  • @jester5ify
    @jester5ify 3 роки тому +4

    Could not think of a better use for those rolling death traps.

  • @kaperierahill1084
    @kaperierahill1084 3 роки тому +6

    Love it. Nothing is impossible to Those who Imagine To Do.

  • @babyjesus9244
    @babyjesus9244 3 роки тому

    That over pressure with no where to go is gonna turn your insides to jelly

  • @KobraVR
    @KobraVR 3 роки тому +1

    Looks good but I bet its denied on cost. If the army was that worried about the lives of its soldiers it would look after them better when they leave. Probably someone will sit in an office and work out its cheaper to train 4 lads for 12 months and a regular land rover than one of these modified vehicles. Its all money unfortunately.

  • @allongshanks940
    @allongshanks940 3 роки тому +4

    I take it the 22 people who didn't like this are not...erm, well how should I put this, not fans of the British Army?

  • @rogerspunkt8983
    @rogerspunkt8983 3 роки тому +6

    isn´t this called "reactive armor" and is around since the 80`s

    • @JamesWitte
      @JamesWitte 3 роки тому +10

      nope, reactive armour explodes into the incoming warheads. this is a counter force for IEDs/mines under the vehicle

    • @itisinfactpaul2868
      @itisinfactpaul2868 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah, as the other comment mentioned, reactive armor is armor which detonates when a projectile impacts it. Generally, only the part of the armor in direct contact with the projectile detonates, and that detonation serves to break up and bleed energy off of the projectile. This is very different for a number of reasons. It isn't armor at all; it's an electronically actuated system that applies force to the vehicle, whereas reactive armor is just a compound with no electrical system. Also, reactive armor works almost exclusively against projectiles, while this appears to work only against blasts.
      That being said, I'm extremely skeptical about this idea. It involves effectively doubling the force of the explosion, and unless there's a LOT more to the "carbon fiber reinforced belly plate" it's absolutely silly to think that carbon fiber can even begin to approach the blast resistance of a higher, bowed hull that has the benifit of not being forced down INTO the explosion.

  • @MaggotAddict21
    @MaggotAddict21 3 роки тому +4

    "I used the explosion to destroy the explosion."

  • @garrycoates2147
    @garrycoates2147 3 роки тому +1

    Lets fix this lazyness. Roger's company is ABBS. His funding support is on crowdcube. As of today it is still open (13days). I cannot provide urls as youtube takes my comments down.

  • @80srenaissance67
    @80srenaissance67 3 роки тому +2

    So now the Taliban and co know exactly how to counteract this move....Great job 👏

  • @igotajopamerica3040
    @igotajopamerica3040 3 роки тому +4

    Love seeing the new ideas. Just don't know how appropriate it is to tell all your secrets to the enemy.

  • @TomGodson95
    @TomGodson95 3 роки тому +8

    5:40 imagine accidentally fitting this too a radiator in your house

    • @HoppingSkipper
      @HoppingSkipper 3 роки тому +1

      "Plumbers HATE Him! Watch how he defies conventional radiators with this one simple trick!"

    • @michaelanderson7715
      @michaelanderson7715 3 роки тому

      to, not too

    • @Stigstigster
      @Stigstigster 3 роки тому

      That conjures up a pretty hilarious image!

  • @binod7623
    @binod7623 3 роки тому +10

    This guy definitely deserves ATTENTION.
    He seems old , hope his invention don't go to waste.

  • @mddprozz
    @mddprozz 3 роки тому +1

    Ok, I understand everything put in place, but I still don't think this will work, because the displacement of the air in the cabin. Think of it as putting earplugs in, then "thunder clapping" your ears. Doing this could blow your eardrums and burst your capillaries. Shoot you dont have to thunder clap to do that, shooting a 556 rifle has done it in the past. With that said. Imagine what a 6kg explosive can do to the human body thats in the cabin.
    TLDR: yes the vehicle is safe, but will it really prevent internal bleeding?

  • @logangrimnar3800
    @logangrimnar3800 3 роки тому +1

    These seem great for standard landmines, but comparing it to the American use of a wedge on the MRAPs is apples to oranges. Those are designed to protect heavy vehicles from shaped charges (penetrators), whereas this guys system is for designed to protect light vehicles from the concussive force of (standard?) land mines.
    Not knocking his design, it's brilliant, just wondering why the Brits can't stop themselves from trying to compare everything they do to the American military.

  • @bigbozo4888
    @bigbozo4888 3 роки тому +4

    British: finds solution to IED
    IRA: Oh sh

    • @JammyDodger45
      @JammyDodger45 3 роки тому

      IRA?
      What century are you in lad? Get a grip.

    • @Alucard-gt1zf
      @Alucard-gt1zf 3 роки тому +2

      @@JammyDodger45 the IRA still exist.....

    • @bigbozo4888
      @bigbozo4888 3 роки тому +3

      @@Alucard-gt1zf Mhm.. Bomb attacks were recorded in 2014, by the IRA.

    • @bigbozo4888
      @bigbozo4888 3 роки тому +2

      @@JammyDodger45 IRA still exists and stands up to this day.

  • @Adam_holloway
    @Adam_holloway 3 роки тому +4

    Quirky engineering - love it

  • @thearcher1740
    @thearcher1740 3 роки тому +4

    Literally everything that happens in the world is "just physics"

  • @kokomao9446
    @kokomao9446 3 роки тому +1

    Vehicle damage is not an issue...If a mine explodes...Do you know the situation of a soldier inside the vehicle ?
    His bones starts breaking and ear drum bangs out and what not ?
    It's easy to these kind of child play inventions...

  • @krugtech
    @krugtech 3 роки тому +1

    put some energetic charges underneath, believe it or not, rockets/charges can cause a huge reduction of pressure when the inertia of the specifically directed gasses evacuates the area

  • @markturner6755
    @markturner6755 3 роки тому +4

    Modern day Barnes Wallace inventing in his shed. Well done Sir!

    • @jonwatson9765
      @jonwatson9765 3 роки тому

      Ah yes, the "Wheezers and Dodgers" with the great panjandrum and Bangalore torpedo and much else.

    • @jonwatson9765
      @jonwatson9765 3 роки тому

      Met Barnes Wallace once at an Effingham school event. Somehow surprised at how normal a person he was.

  • @kiwihunter3476
    @kiwihunter3476 3 роки тому +15

    The soldiers surviving these attacks have been going home and finding years later that they have internal bleeding from the shockwave

    • @bbearhug
      @bbearhug 3 роки тому +1

      Or inflammation of the brain causing depression and PTSD or their body no longer produces testosterone because of the shockwaves that hit their nuts.

    • @donntabale2054
      @donntabale2054 3 роки тому

      With all due respect imo it is a choice for soldiers to go home in bodybags or small boxes containing their body parts or coming home alive albeit with the possibility later that some of their body function will be affected....imo the later will win over the former for the simple reason that death is certain the other one can have remedy....

    • @kiwihunter3476
      @kiwihunter3476 3 роки тому

      @@donntabale2054 whether we admit it or not dieing on a battlefield is viewed by a fighters friends & families as a heros death you will forever be remembered as young and tough, but there is something psychological about seeing someone or being the one whose body/mind fails them leaving them shells of them former selves is not how I'd want to be remembered

    • @donntabale2054
      @donntabale2054 3 роки тому

      @@kiwihunter3476 i agree with u 100% because we seldom see heroes walking with us, it is always those who died in the battlefield for whatever cause ur country may have that are automatically granted that privilege of being called hero, but coming home alive does not diminished the stature of a soldier just because he/she came home walking and not in a coffin, eventually when that soldier dies sooner or later he will also be accorded that 21 gun salute in honor for his service and join the ranks of his fellow soldiers who died in battle as heroes....

  • @skyisthelimit9951
    @skyisthelimit9951 3 роки тому +4

    Brit: Well, we developed a new tech to protect our vehicles.
    Taliban: Send that here we will give you proof that your another new tech miserably fail and you wasted billions of tax dollars.

  • @daviderhahon
    @daviderhahon 3 роки тому +1

    Really nice.
    But I got two questions though..
    1. What would be the sensing device to detect the detonation; and to do so early enough?
    2. What would be the effect on the vehicle and on the occupants if the rockets were to fire falsely when there was actually no IED detonation?

  • @iamfodder1017
    @iamfodder1017 3 роки тому +1

    How is it possible for this man to have to launch a crowd funder to find money for this? Seems like the military and the government would jump with joy to see this in place?

  • @CharliePotts101
    @CharliePotts101 3 роки тому +6

    This man might have found a way to save thousands of life’s in the future