@@jancizuletek670 Milo is a common supplement to milk. You add it in and it tastes different. It's almost like taking one of those weird milk straw thingies and crushing it up into a powder.
imagine if it detonated but instead of the world blowing up, it would freeze for 10 secs and have a screen show: "You have been disconnected: Internal Server Error"
This is Star-Trek-level technology, so far beyond current technological capabilities and physical understanding, really nothing to worry about. On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being containment of Neutronium in antigravity stasis fields, household fusion reactors are about at 0.
@@send_love Warp drive might be at like level 9.5, as you can still whack general relativity hard enough to get a not fundamentally impossible concept like the Alcubierre drive, that however still requires absurd amounts of mass and energy. I think 5 on that scale would be humanity becoming a Type II civilization on the Kardashev scale.
Interesting @@MarianKeller , thank you for your reply. So this neutron bomb thing is really far far out there if it's beyond K2, maybe somewhere at 2.9 or 3.something. Interesting. What is so hard about it? To my knowledge we are closer to warp drives than to K1. If 'we' invented the tech is another question. We might have taken/received it from another species or civilization or some retro-causality 'ourselves', I don't know. The Alt Propulsion and Alien Scientist channel (search for APEC Conference) have some good material on Warp and other tech. Using those devices without getting annihilated in the process is probably a way bigger project than getting to the working drive itself so I don't know how that will turn out lol... Ok I have another question. What would it take for us to develop a human like us from scratch. So imagine you have 0 human DNA. How hard is it to create a human? Take a wild guess.
Hey @@MarianKeller so I just learned that... Z = X*Y Where Y is the amount of Energy Input, X is the efficiency and Z is the Warp Drive Power. Now apparently some smug established experts say that since X can't be changed Y has to be super big for Z to work. Well... turns out X can be optimized and is not constant.
@@sethdrake7551 Dude that's such an understatement. Also I can't tell if he's trolling or not. Anyway if we ever had the ability to contain neutron stars like this, it's big magnetic spinning cousin is far more fun.
“It could destroy the face of earth in 1 second” - wow “16 times over” -Well Shit “For the next 611 seconds” - (❍ᴥ❍ʋ) “Until it’s power is reduced by half” -Uhh what
So basically earth will be fried 19515 before it degenerates to nothing than atoms or in simple case, the earth got thanos snapped into oblivion Edit: the math for this is to multiply 1 by 16 for the first second and divide it by 2 after it reaches 611 seconds it progresses for example after two seconds it will be 16 - (8 / 611) which will be 15.9869. This mean that after 2 secs earth will be fried 31.9869 times
"Puts this whole video into the nonsense category", or the hypothetical category. For curiosity and interesting fun. Pull the stick out your ass buzz kill.
I can already imagine the world's militaries converging on whatever location is said to house a world-ending device... It would be one of the few moments where the entire planet has to cooperate with each other regardless of prior differences... All to either diffuse the thing, or launch it out of orbit and send it somewhere else so it won't go off on Earth...
World governments intervene and then ask SpaceX to empty out the next Starlink rocket payload "cuz we got something important to send on a Trans Mars Injection Burn" (which I guess would be ok as long as the casing/housing mass was under two tons)
There would still be a few people trying to get there first, trying to set it off before it could be defused. Some people just want to see the world burn, even if they know it will destroy them too. 🤷
that would in fact not be possible. TNT is a secondary explosive, it needs an initial detonation from another (primary) high explosive to detonate. that's why it was used for 30 years before somebody found out that it was useful as an explosive at all. that would never have happened with something like nitroglycerin.
I saw in an episode of Ripley's Believe it or Not where in the 19th Century a prisoner committed suicide by extracting dyes from a pack of playing cards to manufacture an explosive.
Just imagine the neutron activation that would happen! A good portion of those neutrons would go into carbon 14 and other radioactive isotopes that would make the earth screamingly radioactive.
The fact that this can release enough energy to devastate the world's surface multiple times within the first second, but the whole explosion only evaporates 10% of the water is testament to the amazing thermodynamic properties of water and its ability to absorb energy.
there is an error at around 9:14. you calculated that the energy released from the neutrons in 1s equals the energy of 2.5 million zar bombs which each destroyed an area of 3800 km^2. from there you simply multiplied 3800 with 2.5 million and compared it to the earth surface. for this calculation to be valid you need to assume a linear relationship between energy released and area destroyed. this however is not the case. there are multiple other factors at work, one major one being that the explosion affects all 3 dimensions including vertical ones, and not just the 2 dimensions of the area. so part of the energy goes into the ground and the air/atmosphere. so if you detonate a bomb with twice the energy, you wont get twice the area destroyed. in return you also get a deeper penetration into the ground. if you really wanted to destroy this area with this amount of energy, you would need to split up your neutron bomb into 2.5 million smaller bombs and distribute them equally around the earth area. this also explains why the energy is only sufficient to evaporate 11% of the ocean despite allegedly destroying the whole area of the earth 16 times. by distributing the energy into small bombs over the whole area (which would be required to destroy this large of an area) you lack the penetration power and only the top layers of the oceans evaporate. this is by the way the idea behind cluster munitions. by splitting your explosives into smaller parts and distribute them in the area you can destroy a larger area with the same amount of explosives. the disadvantage being that your penetration power drops so you cant use cluster munitions effectivly against armoured targets.
Even a half life version of a neutronium bomb would be enough to take out all but the saintly precurious cats. A meutronium bomb they call it, capable of killing a cat 8 times over. A weapon invented by dogs to level the playing field in the true war that's really going on right now. It will leave the few cats remaining with one life left, so they stop with their zany antics.
OR it could kill 2.34 x10^45 cats in less than a second. Even though I like cats, THAT would be a UA-cam cat video I would watch. After all, that IS the purpose of UA-cam: cat videos...
Ikr that's saying the blast would cover the globe in 1/16th of a second so I guess that means 611×16=9,776 times I think he said that asteroid but bigger, would have hit the earth.
Yeah but it’s so hard to get since you have to got through a black hole and come out and no ones actually done that yet so it doesn’t really matter and I think if you manage to make it you should be able to use it
That would be what is needed to push the Earth in a further orbit as the sun gets bigger... I think the calculations were like losing 200m of sea level.
It's not like it really matters considering everything else would be a crater and the only life people around to care will be tardigrades and the - 111 billion humans (yes I did the math, 7 billion people each die 16 times thus meaning only 1 billion out of the 112 billion deaths would actually be from living people leaving -111 billion people) Edit: actually it would be negative 105 billion people rather than -111 billion
@@nejsonsvejson9861 Cave Johnson here! Introducing the neutron bomb turret! It fires bombs so powerful that each one can destroy the facility. Cave Johnson! we are done here.
difference between subject zero science and kurzgesagt. kurzgesagt is like ‘hey its okay this wont happen’ while subject zero science is like ‘Okay, anyways”
@@Geraduss It would probably be destroyed by the event's own friction before it could even get remotely close to the surface. It would produce one hell of a bang, though. Now, a bigger object that would sustain some of it's mass in the process while going significantly slower than 99% the speed of light? a much bigger problem.
That's basically one method of enacting an exterminatus. I haven't heard of any weapon in the 40k universe yet that would function in the same manner. Does such a weapon exist in that universe?
@@TenorCantusFirmus most of the people don't know that the water diluted in the air is a greenhouse, and -the water from the farmers and combustion engines contributes to this effect.- Edited: I search for this topic and found that water isn't the problem right now. I strikethrough my wrong text above. Because the water that we are adding to the air is condensing back to the water. In contrast, the CO2 isn't removed from the air faster than the rater that is added. The greenhouse effect from the water is dependent on the temperature, the CO2 increases the temperature and then this increase in temperature increase the water, so water is amplifying the effect of CO2.
If you factor in heat capacity of water and the fact that 11% is not of some swimming pool but all the water in the oceans. Then you realise its crazy.
They actually nerfed the Tsar Bomba by replacing a lot of its reaction mass with lead, since they were horrified of what it could do at full power. So that giant explosion is what happens when the Russians half ass a nuclear bomb...
Cool, I thought the author was goind to tell about antimatter, but he surprised me! Nice clip, thanks! It's good that people do not know how to keep such numbers of neutrons together. But in future "galactic" wars this would be a new word in the weapons of the mass destruction.
Tzar Bomba actually had a calculated yield of 58Mt. Something usually not mentioned is that it was designed to yield 100Mt but they didn't add the uranium-238 fusion tamper stage. Mostly because the delivery plane would not have survived and the fallout would have contaminated a vastly greater area.
Ground-level view of detonation (source: Rosatom State Corporation Communications Department: Rosatom: 20-08-2020 public release)[1] Type Thermonuclear Place of origin Soviet Union Production history Designer Yulii Khariton, Andrei Sakharov, Viktor Adamsky, Yuri Babayev and Yuri Smirnov [ru], Yuri Trutnev, and Yakov Zel'dovich, Ceghe Manufacturer Soviet Union No. built 1 operational ( 2 "prototypes" ) Specifications Mass 27,000 kg (60,000 lb)[2] Length 8 m (26 ft)[2] Diameter 2.1 m (6 ft 11 in)[2] Detonation mechanism barometric sensor[3] Blast yield 50-58 megatons of TNT (210-240 PJ)[4]
Usually not mentioned? The actual intended yield of the Tsar is almost always mentioned when some kind of documentary about the bomb is shown, and it is definitely in all literature about it. And as far as it being 58Mt? Not important, and still just an estimate.
Okay, so the Tzar Bomba, a Soviet hydrogen bomb, was originally meant to be this massive 100-megaton explosion. But they dialed it down to 58 megatons by skipping a part called the uranium-238 fusion tamper. If they'd kept it in, the bomb would have been way more powerful, but it could have wrecked the plane carrying it and caused way more fallout. So, they played it safe and toned it down to avoid extra problems.
@David Furdui black whole bomb can be used as an energy source but physically not possible to make it explode in earth *but if it is oh boy we are screwed*
Scientist: "You can use Neutronium to power more homes" Government: "Meh coal can do the same" Scientist: "You can also destroy the planet in 10 minutes with it" Government: "SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!"
I suggest reading a book called "Critical Path" by the famous polymath, R. Buckminster Fuller. That one book could stimulate ideas for a thousand episodes. Bucky Fuller was awarded 47 honorary doctorates and the presidential medal of freedom. He coined the phrase "Spaceship Earth", and "Comprehensive Anticipatory Design Science".
I'm just thinking how planets and starts gravity would effect this material and how would space ship handle moving this mass around in star system. Also i was thinking inquisition going "WRITE IT DOWN!! WRITE IT DOWN!!"
Aggressive alien civilization: "Earth, we are here to conquer you!" Earth: "We have a neutronium bomb" Aggressive aliens: "Understandable, have a great day!"
@@asuraizen alien commander : "roll out, we well get them next time, but there is no time, and thats too bad, besides i had enough of my shift for once" *a few minutes later* commander : ATTENTION ALL ALIENS! I PROPOSE TO RETIRE! I CANT HANDLE THIS BULLSHIT ANYMORE! ps: "can you put my badge on the board?"
I know you're joking, but just wanted to add a little more education to it. It's named after Ivan the Terrible, the first Tsar of Russia. He's pretty much universally known to be one of the cruelest and insane rulers of Russia; possibly the world.
The Chinese have tested neutron bombs , kills everything does not completely wipe out assets. I.believe the radiation does not last long so you can move in later .
They’ve been built. They were called “capitalist bombs” by the Soviets because they largely preserve buildings while killing every living being. They did briefly consider using these as defensive devices to deplete the fissile material of an incoming nuclear bomb, but it was considered impractical.
1 second is highly unlikely unless the heat energy and the shockwave travel at 1/14 of the speed of light. A nuclear explosion blast travels at around 30 km/s. Which is crazy fast but not nearly enough to run half the circumference of the Earth, which is about 20000 km, in one second.
This video makes so many assumptions that it reminded me of an old joke: "Let us assume that a cow is a perfect sphere and is made entirely of antimatter. From this we can plainly see that cows are the most destructive creatures in existence..."
Yep to survive you would just need to build a submersible that could go down to the bottom of a very deep ocean and wait it out. Altho upon returning to the surface, there would be nothing left in the aftermath, so it would be like you just stepped out on the moon!! 😮
Just think about the fact that the deepest point in the ocean, is something around 1% of the earth's diameter, we are are literally not even scratching the surface.
@@FurtivePigmy right. It is mind boggling. And we only see underground cities in video games and movies (aside from secret gov stuff) .. seems like some missed opportunity.
@@allensmith.aaffect.1626 i think that if we could have lived inside it, we would have already. Oxygen and normal temperatures are the main lacking things..
@@TheJunky228 not if he's deep enough Although if he was that deep he would probably die of decompression sickness due to the decompression chambers being obliterated
Tsar was designed for a mind shattering 100Mt yield. They purposely halfed it. And even at half power and with a parachute deployed to slow it's decent as much as possible to give the bomber crew time to evacuate the region, the still barely made it out
@@DeadAccount53885 Most of all bombs detonated in the air to reach maximum apogee of destruction area. Leaving it on the ground will allow energy to be absorbed right into the ground and even though it was hydrogen bomb it would lead to fallout.
@@z1rka127 They detonated the Tsar at 4000 meters in order to keep it as clean as possible. The optimum height for the Tsar would be 600 meters. The reason why they did not detonate it on the ground was simple. It would have been way too dirty and problematic.
"How much explosives can I use?" "Only a spoonfull" *gets comically large spoon of neutronium*
Comically heavy*
/gets comically large spoon of Milo
/laughs in australian
@@LordPhobos6502 whats a milo
@@jancizuletek670 Milo is a common supplement to milk. You add it in and it tastes different. It's almost like taking one of those weird milk straw thingies and crushing it up into a powder.
Goodbye solar system.
“It could destroy the surface in one second
Oh ok, that’s really bad
“16 times over”
Well then
Activate the Honda-beat
The bomb in the second second "watch me do it again"
@@mihailmilev9909 for 5.5 more hours 🤣
**leaves the chat**
XD
This explosion sounds like it would cause some serious lag.
LOL! 🤣🤣🤣
The ark pfp makes this better
imagine if it detonated but instead of the world blowing up, it would freeze for 10 secs and have a screen show: "You have been disconnected: Internal Server Error"
@@shovelmp4971 We live in a simulation confirmed
I think, i would probably die.
This is Star-Trek-level technology, so far beyond current technological capabilities and physical understanding, really nothing to worry about. On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being containment of Neutronium in antigravity stasis fields, household fusion reactors are about at 0.
This. By the time this type of bomb is possible, there will be defenses to at least mitigate the harm to some degree, if not neutralize the threat.
what is a 5?
where is the warp drive?
@@send_love Warp drive might be at like level 9.5, as you can still whack general relativity hard enough to get a not fundamentally impossible concept like the Alcubierre drive, that however still requires absurd amounts of mass and energy. I think 5 on that scale would be humanity becoming a Type II civilization on the Kardashev scale.
Interesting @@MarianKeller , thank you for your reply.
So this neutron bomb thing is really far far out there if it's beyond K2, maybe somewhere at 2.9 or 3.something. Interesting. What is so hard about it?
To my knowledge we are closer to warp drives than to K1. If 'we' invented the tech is another question. We might have taken/received it from another species or civilization or some retro-causality 'ourselves', I don't know.
The Alt Propulsion and Alien Scientist channel (search for APEC Conference) have some good material on Warp and other tech.
Using those devices without getting annihilated in the process is probably a way bigger project than getting to the working drive itself so I don't know how that will turn out lol...
Ok I have another question. What would it take for us to develop a human like us from scratch. So imagine you have 0 human DNA. How hard is it to create a human? Take a wild guess.
Hey @@MarianKeller so I just learned that...
Z = X*Y
Where Y is the amount of Energy Input, X is the efficiency and Z is the Warp Drive Power.
Now apparently some smug established experts say that since X can't be changed Y has to be super big for Z to work.
Well... turns out X can be optimized and is not constant.
"14 and a half hours of pure hell."
A normal work day then...
LMAO
Bring it on! I went through 6 years of it in my past marriage.
Another double shift on a Mother's day at the restaurant, fml. Bring it!
@@marcosarg1 I worked at the village inn pancake house in my teenage years. Mother’s Day was the worst. The had no mercy
🤣🤣🤣🤣
bacteria at the bottom of the ocean: hmm getting a little warmer than usual. whatever
The intelligent lifeform descended from that bacteria eons from now will call this the 'oops' event.
lol
And why is the sun getting so close?
@The Kizzers Shizzer problem: stars a very hard to kill and push
@@sethdrake7551
Dude that's such an understatement. Also I can't tell if he's trolling or not. Anyway if we ever had the ability to contain neutron stars like this, it's big magnetic spinning cousin is far more fun.
“It could destroy the face of earth in 1 second”
- wow
“16 times over”
-Well Shit
“For the next 611 seconds”
- (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)
“Until it’s power is reduced by half”
-Uhh what
A teaspoon... Well shit
Yes, we would be f*cked
Makes Anime characters look like little bitches
So basically earth will be fried 19515 before it degenerates to nothing than atoms or in simple case, the earth got thanos snapped into oblivion
Edit: the math for this is to multiply 1 by 16 for the first second and divide it by 2 after it reaches 611 seconds it progresses for example after two seconds it will be 16 - (8 / 611) which will be 15.9869. This mean that after 2 secs earth will be fried 31.9869 times
if jupiter got ignited it would do more damage
with more than plenty oxygen ofcourse
"A stick of dynamite can power a house for 1 hour"
Instructions unclear. Tried to power my home with TNT. House exploded.
man these comments are funny as hell regardless of the dead ass serous topic in the video 🤣
Yeah, uh, Merry Christmas to you too.
Yeah lol.
The ending was like... I EXPECT MORE DESTRUCTION!!! LIKE CORONA???!!!!
Right.
HAHAHAHAAHAH
Haven’t heard anyone say that since last year 😎
7:20 Man that bomb assembly animation was satisfying,
Almost as satisfying as cracking a planet with it.
I would watch, like, and comment on a video just talking about that how he made that animation
stop being such an annoying dictionary
Gives me Portal 2 vibes
@@salesmon7871 but what does that even mean
@@milanstevic8424 idk
_"Only 11 percent of the oceans would be evaporated."_
*Oh, so this is how we solve the rising sea level.*
Yes
You deserve my like
It does come with a ˡᶦᵗᵗˡᵉ cost tho
i mean if it just evaporates, it would come back as radioactive rain tho
@@Ichupachups neutronium is not radioactive bruh
Imagine aliens watching earth as it gets vaporized 16 times over
"RIP monkeys"
that explosion would drastically effect fishing season
Ik, luckily it should only be a minor inconvenience
Would the daily limit be revoked?
it would be pretty hard to fish in the vacuum of empty space, so I'd say probably.
I would say shotgun season is a no go too right?
@@Bean-ox9jq Probably. You know, some people just feel the need to be a Fun-Nazi.
So essentially, anyone who is caught trying to make that kind of bomb is immediately the enemy of every human being.
Exactly cuz what the hell
I've nearly finished it
"Puts this whole video into the nonsense category", or the hypothetical category. For curiosity and interesting fun. Pull the stick out your ass buzz kill.
also ratio
bozo
Other people: "Merry Christmas!"
Subject Zero: "What if we blew up the planet?"
16 times 😂
@@bhuvaneshs.k638 For Several Hours.
Answer: no one would care, as no one but the fish wil suives to care.
And the fish would not care because it would not change anything for them
If he used Vibranium would be more "scientific" and more "inclusive" to boot.
...we’ve done that already.
I can already imagine the world's militaries converging on whatever location is said to house a world-ending device... It would be one of the few moments where the entire planet has to cooperate with each other regardless of prior differences... All to either diffuse the thing, or launch it out of orbit and send it somewhere else so it won't go off on Earth...
World governments intervene and then ask SpaceX to empty out the next Starlink rocket payload "cuz we got something important to send on a Trans Mars Injection Burn" (which I guess would be ok as long as the casing/housing mass was under two tons)
Yes, it's very clear that you watch too many movies. 😆
There would still be a few people trying to get there first, trying to set it off before it could be defused. Some people just want to see the world burn, even if they know it will destroy them too. 🤷
Sounds like a great idea, lets contain something that. should the power ever fail, destroy the planet 16x over.
"My damn paintings keep blowing up."
"You using TNT Yellow?"
"Yeah -- how'd you know?"
kaboom
40K Orks in essence.
that would in fact not be possible. TNT is a secondary explosive, it needs an initial detonation from another (primary) high explosive to detonate. that's why it was used for 30 years before somebody found out that it was useful as an explosive at all. that would never have happened with something like nitroglycerin.
@@chellovack I just pictured a pork version of Bob Ross painting with TNT yellow
I saw in an episode of Ripley's Believe it or Not where in the 19th Century a prisoner committed suicide by extracting dyes from a pack of playing cards to manufacture an explosive.
Just imagine the neutron activation that would happen! A good portion of those neutrons would go into carbon 14 and other radioactive isotopes that would make the earth screamingly radioactive.
That means whatever else might evolve will become fallout freaks.
That was the most nerd thing I’ve ever heard
There is absolutely no reason to have a bomb this destructive in a war between nations. None
@@bananaspy20 ikr isn't it great.
@@showoofity50 lol
The fact that this can release enough energy to devastate the world's surface multiple times within the first second, but the whole explosion only evaporates 10% of the water is testament to the amazing thermodynamic properties of water and its ability to absorb energy.
that, as well as the sheer amount of water on earth
@@alexandergreene461 smort
@@alexandergreene461 Make sure to have vacuum insulated mirrored tungsten walls
@@alexandergreene461 man gonna make a Minecraft obsidian water wall base IRL
Well, there is always a silver lining! 😳😊
there is an error at around 9:14. you calculated that the energy released from the neutrons in 1s equals the energy of 2.5 million zar bombs which each destroyed an area of 3800 km^2. from there you simply multiplied 3800 with 2.5 million and compared it to the earth surface. for this calculation to be valid you need to assume a linear relationship between energy released and area destroyed. this however is not the case. there are multiple other factors at work, one major one being that the explosion affects all 3 dimensions including vertical ones, and not just the 2 dimensions of the area. so part of the energy goes into the ground and the air/atmosphere. so if you detonate a bomb with twice the energy, you wont get twice the area destroyed. in return you also get a deeper penetration into the ground. if you really wanted to destroy this area with this amount of energy, you would need to split up your neutron bomb into 2.5 million smaller bombs and distribute them equally around the earth area. this also explains why the energy is only sufficient to evaporate 11% of the ocean despite allegedly destroying the whole area of the earth 16 times. by distributing the energy into small bombs over the whole area (which would be required to destroy this large of an area) you lack the penetration power and only the top layers of the oceans evaporate.
this is by the way the idea behind cluster munitions. by splitting your explosives into smaller parts and distribute them in the area you can destroy a larger area with the same amount of explosives. the disadvantage being that your penetration power drops so you cant use cluster munitions effectivly against armoured targets.
Impressive work
this bomb could even kill a cat, which has 9 lives, in one go.
100th like
Lol
Even a half life version of a neutronium bomb would be enough to take out all but the saintly precurious cats. A meutronium bomb they call it, capable of killing a cat 8 times over. A weapon invented by dogs to level the playing field in the true war that's really going on right now. It will leave the few cats remaining with one life left, so they stop with their zany antics.
Complete insanity!! The need for this iissssss....yeah well that's what I thought.
OR it could kill 2.34 x10^45 cats in less than a second. Even though I like cats, THAT would be a UA-cam cat video I would watch.
After all, that IS the purpose of UA-cam: cat videos...
I finally know what I’m going to make for my science fair project!
*A dark matter reactor?*
*Very similar to the nutronium bombs shape?*
Or a black hole
Lol
*FBI WANTS TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION*
“Ferb? I know what we’re gonna do today!”
I felt it in my soul when the speaker said, "sixteen. times. over."
Ikr that's saying the blast would cover the globe in 1/16th of a second so I guess that means 611×16=9,776 times I think he said that asteroid but bigger, would have hit the earth.
no le entiendo ayuda no hablo ingles como salgo de aquí!?
Whew !...........I'm glad he didn't say 17 times over. Does this mean we might stand a chance? Do I need to sell my company stock?
todd howard: sixteen times the detail
i had to go back and watch again and now i see the comment
There’s so many bombs built that I’m not even scared anymore I’ve just accepted the fact that humanity’s gonna kill itself
"how dense is neutronium?"
physics: yes
Worth 900 pyramids of Giza
@@namenamed4992 900 Boeing 747s
@@spazzey0 where Plutonium 69?
@@SoapMcCallister sadly plutonium 69 decayed last year
And it's gas
This sounds too op, they should nerf it in the next update for sure.
Bro I've been telling everyone but no one is listening
Yeah but it’s so hard to get since you have to got through a black hole and come out and no ones actually done that yet so it doesn’t really matter and I think if you manage to make it you should be able to use it
helo fnf mod person
If they nerf then no one would play the game "earth" lamooo
Imagine the next update they will reboot earth with it
“Only eleven percent of the oceans have been evaporated.”
... That is kinda not a good thing, even on its own.
Yeah, kinda...
That would be what is needed to push the Earth in a further orbit as the sun gets bigger... I think the calculations were like losing 200m of sea level.
That was exactly my first reaction after the video
It's not like it really matters considering everything else would be a crater and the only life people around to care will be tardigrades and the - 111 billion humans (yes I did the math, 7 billion people each die 16 times thus meaning only 1 billion out of the 112 billion deaths would actually be from living people leaving -111 billion people)
Edit: actually it would be negative 105 billion people rather than -111 billion
@@scibanana3542 Small detail, how about all the submarines out on deployment. They'd survive, right? Not that they maybe would want too, but still.
This is why hydration is important guys. If the human body is about 60% water, you too can survive since it would only evaporate about 10% of water.
Genius!
Stay in the bath.
😂😂😂lol
😂
Bro Harvard wants to know your location
"But can we use it against the Russians?"
"Mr. President I don't think you understood what.."
"Can. We. Use. It. Against. The. Russians?"
Call of duty?
@@Chuked No idea what you are referring to. I just tried to be funny.
so uh.... Greetings from Russia, lol
(totally not looking for Putin's number rn)
🤣🤣🤣
@@deffmuzic I don't know. It is more of the US military complex thingy than a Trumpy thingy tho.
Subject Zero Science: *Scares the shit out of people*
People : But this wont happen right?
Subject Zero Science : All right folks, we're done here.
Just like in the portal marketing videos!
@@nejsonsvejson9861
Cave Johnson here! Introducing the neutron bomb turret! It fires bombs so powerful that each one can destroy the facility.
Cave Johnson! we are done here.
@@davisdf3064 yeah that seems about right
No ! Relax, . . . live your life . . . . just be safe. . . and live your life. . . . . . . . . .
difference between subject zero science and kurzgesagt. kurzgesagt is like ‘hey its okay this wont happen’ while subject zero science is like ‘Okay, anyways”
when killing everything once isn't enough, you feel the need to do it 16 times over
And some
Like being married to a narcissist
I want to wipe the solar system Allah Akbar ahlalalalalalal
In the first second
in only 1 second
The narrator tells us how destructive it is and then just “alright folks we’re done here 😂😂😂
Oh *"we're done"* alright, if ykyk
Okay
@@Burneth_ ??? I don’t know
I was like: oh right! Yup, cheers bud, see ya soon then ey?
I’m getting some Cave Johnson vibes.
Thank you for the America unit conversions. As an American I appreciate any measurement not in metric. Gimme those Olympic pools
Ditto 😂
NASA: “Do you see that planet over there?”
Navy: “Yes.”
NASA: “I don’t want to.”
You can just look away geez
@@EshwenAudanal nope. kaboom.
@@EshwenAudanal B O O M goes the dynamite.
Tenpenny about Megaton in Fallout 3 🤣😂
@@stony6221 LOL - so lets me honest here, did YOU destroy Megaton or not??
"Only 11 percent of the oceans would be evaporated."
Oh, so nothing to worry about then.
That means badlands chugs is more destructive
Lol I mean if that was all yeah
We have reversed rising sea levels
that solves the water levels rising issue lol
I mean the oceans are beginning to rise so I see this as a plus
"Ferb, I know what we're going to do today!"
this is *b r i l l i a n t*
Mom comes home and the earth goes in reverse
Hey vsauce Mike here I’m tired of your shit time to nuke the earth
Oh no
Phinias: Don’t worry Ferb we’ll just turn back time after it’s done
Ferb: 😶👍
Who would have thought that Wonka's ever lasting gob stopper could be so deadly
“But is there a way to be even more destructive?”
Something every human being has asked themselves at least once.
every guy who has blown something up at one point lol
Sure, shoot a ¸tiny grain of sand at the earth at the 99.999999999999% of the speed of light and see it explode in a flash as bright as a star.
Oh actually a dude created plans to engulf a Black Hole to create energy, that can also be used to destroy our local star group
Chili. Lots of delicious chili.
@@Geraduss It would probably be destroyed by the event's own friction before it could even get remotely close to the surface. It would produce one hell of a bang, though.
Now, a bigger object that would sustain some of it's mass in the process while going significantly slower than 99% the speed of light? a much bigger problem.
"what is the density of neutronium?"
Yes. The density is yes.
Sounds like a GrayStillPlays answer lol
Almost as dense as yo mama
@@themaxterz0169 densiDEZZNUTS
Its T H E density.
Gray: Hey Reginald what is that
Reginald: Father I crave heat
Video: "First used as yellow dye. Lots of people died."
My mind: "Lots of people dyed."
lol, dad joke
lol
lol
Lol
Everyone else: "LOL"
My mind: "Lols of people dyed."
What is wrong with me? 😂
Neutronium is basically how heavy matter would really be if it had no space between its particles.
Just remember that the Tsar bomb was detonated with only half of its potential.
Because they wanted thier pilots alive...
@@FIRE_STORMFOX-3692 Well, the guy who made the bomb wanted the pilots to survive.
The proof of this claim, drunken Russians.
@@FIRE_STORMFOX-3692 Rare stuff on the URSS
@@A.R.77 In WWII The allies offered Russia Spitfires and P-51's but they declined since the cockpits could not accommodate a Vodka bottle.
"14 and a half hours of pure hell."
Sounds like school.
That was classed as a half day as a junior hospital doctor in the 1990’s
Try using "rate my professor" first next time
Yes It’s true
Yes It’s true
I would have to disagree with you on this. School is much worse.
"Only 11 percent of the oceans would be evaporated."
Me and my homies after diving session: "Tf everybody go?"
Hope you can stay underwater for multiple hours 😅
@@kingacrisius months
November 11th 2030 "Empty World" Incident
@Brian Beatty I was just going to say lmao. That still has to be dozens of kilometers deep, if not hundreds.
matter of fact, where tf everything go
That's basically one method of enacting an exterminatus. I haven't heard of any weapon in the 40k universe yet that would function in the same manner. Does such a weapon exist in that universe?
Next: How to make your own Neutronium with standard household cleaning products!
That would get you a lot of views:)
Neil Buchanan sketched out the plans on Art Attack
MacGyver can make neutronium out of earwax, a golf tee and a dog turd.
Let's just call the A team.
Step one: extract neutrons from the material using a particle accelerator.
“Ferb, i know what we’re gonna do today!”
I knew this was coming XD
@@skarpevindkast doesn't make it any less funny
@@greatanimemaster43 Ok?
"Make the sun on the earth?"
Some war crimes against humanity!
„Only“ 11% of the oceans water evaporated. 😅 So, everything is cool. ;)
Only 11 percent lol that's not so bad 😂 yeah I'm gonna go look at videos of cute kittens to try and not think about this.
it will get hotter if the earth's atmosphere isn't destroyed since water vapour is a greenhouse gass
edit: gas
Life from the hydrothermal vent would survive.
Then, that 11% will cause runaway greenhouse effect and turn the Earth into a second Venus. Sweet dreams...
@@TenorCantusFirmus most of the people don't know that the water diluted in the air is a greenhouse, and -the water from the farmers and combustion engines contributes to this effect.-
Edited:
I search for this topic and found that water isn't the problem right now. I strikethrough my wrong text above. Because the water that we are adding to the air is condensing back to the water. In contrast, the CO2 isn't removed from the air faster than the rater that is added.
The greenhouse effect from the water is dependent on the temperature, the CO2 increases the temperature and then this increase in temperature increase the water, so water is amplifying the effect of CO2.
it would take around eight hundred forty-five septillion megatons to explode the solar system. this in numbers:
845,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
"Could finish off 1.35B human's if stacked ontop of each other - thankfully that's never gonna happen"
China: *sweats*
Lol
(....stands up....begins the slow clap accumulating to an uproarious crescendo) best comment I've seen in quite a while my friend, good on you
I laughed outrageously loudly.
We can only dream
India is the most dense
Ocean: 11% evaporated
Human: 1000% evaporated
Earth: left the group
Pluto: Finally, a one room for me to join
Hotel: Trivago
@@redzy5906 dont work that way but sure, still a shitty joke tho
@@thewaffle187 dont work that way but sure, still a shitty joke tho
people living on the bottom of the ocean... we are fine 😉
Bethesda trying to make another fallout game: write that down write that down!
Imagine the next avolution of civilization finding remnants of our civilizations thinking how did they disapeared so quick. Pompei on a global scale.
or a Doom crossover
@@TheLightMyFire the protheans
Don't you mean Microsoft?
I’ll be back when this prediction becomes true
7:38 Me: thats a huge bomb
That one qsml fan:ISNT THAT THE DMR FROM QSML 3
@Waffle_-ft8nb😭bro it is qsml 3
Roblox and sfs is cool
A neutron walks into a bar and asks "how much for a beer?"
The bartender says, "for you? no charge."
🤣
after all this time i found you dad
@@memesis9945 🤣
i hate this so much.... lol
A photon checks into an airport, "Any luggage?" asks the clerk. "No thanks." says the photon. "I'm travelling light."
the fact that that much energy only evaporates 11% of the oceans is even more mindblowing than the energy released
11 percent is a mind boggling amount of water
@@Cheesusrice69222 i was expecting it to boil off all of it going by the animation lole
If you factor in heat capacity of water and the fact that 11% is not of some swimming pool but all the water in the oceans. Then you realise its crazy.
Water has an extremely high heat of vaporization
11% is like the entire indian ocean@@Cheesusrice69222
They actually nerfed the Tsar Bomba by replacing a lot of its reaction mass with lead, since they were horrified of what it could do at full power.
So that giant explosion is what happens when the Russians half ass a nuclear bomb...
Just went to wikepedia and yup
They replaced the Uranium tamper with a lead tamper so that there was a lot less fallout.
Dang, the russians had morals?
The more you know
bro were actually so fucked. WERE SO FUCKED. DADDY PUTIN IS GONNA PUT US IN TIMEOUT AND GROUND US FROM LITERALLY EXISTING 😩😩😩😩
@@mixedvibes9613 lmao
Even with the Tsar Bomb at half yield they didn't know for sure the aircrew who dropped it would even make it. At full yield? They had no chance.
Cool, I thought the author was goind to tell about antimatter, but he surprised me! Nice clip, thanks!
It's good that people do not know how to keep such numbers of neutrons together. But in future "galactic" wars this would be a new word in the weapons of the mass destruction.
Universe Sandbox players: Look what they need to mimic a fraction of our power
*turns the earth into a giant impossible star of the radious of the milky way*
@@Redgfxr using a grain of sand
@@jaydeemorgan3316 and fires the sand grain at earth at 100000000000000x light speed
I can just hear Grey saying: "Rookie Numbers!" in the back of my mind!
"positive Infinity"
Tzar Bomba actually had a calculated yield of 58Mt. Something usually not mentioned is that it was designed to yield 100Mt but they didn't add the uranium-238 fusion tamper stage. Mostly because the delivery plane would not have survived and the fallout would have contaminated a vastly greater area.
Ground-level view of detonation (source: Rosatom State Corporation Communications Department: Rosatom: 20-08-2020 public release)[1]
Type Thermonuclear
Place of origin Soviet Union
Production history
Designer Yulii Khariton, Andrei Sakharov, Viktor Adamsky, Yuri Babayev and Yuri Smirnov [ru], Yuri Trutnev, and Yakov Zel'dovich, Ceghe
Manufacturer Soviet Union
No. built 1 operational ( 2 "prototypes" )
Specifications
Mass 27,000 kg (60,000 lb)[2]
Length 8 m (26 ft)[2]
Diameter 2.1 m (6 ft 11 in)[2]
Detonation
mechanism
barometric sensor[3]
Blast yield 50-58 megatons of TNT (210-240 PJ)[4]
Usually not mentioned?
The actual intended yield of the Tsar is almost always mentioned when some kind of documentary about the bomb is shown, and it is definitely in all literature about it. And as far as it being 58Mt? Not important, and still just an estimate.
They also put a big ass parachute on it as well so the plane could get away
reminds me of mission impossible fallout
@@AB-80X It's usually not mentioned because the avergae person just looks up how big the bomb was lmao
Tardigrade:
Laughs microscopically.
Small pebble:
haha pebble goes brrrrrrrrrr
@@Feronen I think I smell a stinky Redditor
@@rbvfeehfbudenrj i think i smell a cringy tik toker
@@yeeoo5772 I think I smell a stinky edge lord
@@Wayoutthere I think I smell.
“How’s your day been?”
“Good, pretty nice I’d say”
“Well too bad, time for existential crisis”
Okay, so the Tzar Bomba, a Soviet hydrogen bomb, was originally meant to be this massive 100-megaton explosion. But they dialed it down to 58 megatons by skipping a part called the uranium-238 fusion tamper. If they'd kept it in, the bomb would have been way more powerful, but it could have wrecked the plane carrying it and caused way more fallout. So, they played it safe and toned it down to avoid extra problems.
Him: “… the tsar bomba, code named Ivan.”
Me: “That’s terrible…”
Heh.
Much like Ivan
Lol
@@morency_music no it's Ivan
Maybe it was called in honor of the tsar Ivan the Terrible
5:22
"But is there a way to be more destructive?"
The question humanity has been asking since the dawn of time
@Directruth
America: *nervous sweating*
Is it on fire?
It could be _more_ on fire.
thats deep bro
Nature: “Hold my beer.”
@David Furdui black whole bomb can be used as an energy source but physically not possible to make it explode in earth
*but if it is oh boy we are screwed*
Scientist: "You can use Neutronium to power more homes"
Government: "Meh coal can do the same"
Scientist: "You can also destroy the planet in 10 minutes with it"
Government: "SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!"
16 times a second*
@@sam.p9502 and after a copule of minutes 8 times a second lol
SOCIETY?!?!?!?!?
@@chickenflavor9880 jokr
@@forbidden_channelexe nononononono. It iseth:
joj
bro spawned the whole qserf community with the thumbnail
I suggest reading a book called "Critical Path" by the famous polymath, R. Buckminster Fuller. That one book could stimulate ideas for a thousand episodes. Bucky Fuller was awarded 47 honorary doctorates and the presidential medal of freedom. He coined the phrase "Spaceship Earth", and "Comprehensive Anticipatory Design Science".
Wow, thanks!
Yeah he even got a Carbon Allotrope named after him
I always get him and Lord Buckley mixed up. Both very wise and erudite men with patrician accents.
Hand guide for how to tell if something is dangerous: If it looks like a doomsday weapon from a Sci-Fi comic, it’s bad
The Warhammer 40K Imperial Inquisition: "This is HERESEY!!! Oh my lord where can I get one!!!???"
exterminatus was my first thought also!
I'm just thinking how planets and starts gravity would effect this material and how would space ship handle moving this mass around in star system.
Also i was thinking inquisition going "WRITE IT DOWN!! WRITE IT DOWN!!"
Makes the life eater virus bomb and following inferno seem like a firework
EXTERMINATUS
Seems a little lite for a 40K planet killer, I mean the oceans got out ok
"Imagine transporting it from one place to another"
"Is it even needed to transport?"
This is probably what Level 3 Kardeshev civilisations would call "a dick move"
Shouldn't of killed that Calvary back in 3000bc in the game civilization, they gonna nuke ya ass
Your show me yours, I'll certainly show you mine ... ha ha ha.
@@xenomas frick the Gandi. Only in Sid Meyer's Civ
Aggressive alien civilization: "Earth, we are here to conquer you!"
Earth: "We have a neutronium bomb"
Aggressive aliens: "Understandable, have a great day!"
@@asuraizen alien commander : "roll out, we well get them next time, but there is no time, and thats too bad, besides i had enough of my shift for once"
*a few minutes later* commander : ATTENTION ALL ALIENS! I PROPOSE TO RETIRE! I CANT HANDLE THIS BULLSHIT ANYMORE! ps: "can you put my badge on the board?"
Looks like they couldn't handle the neutron style...
Ok, that was epic.
“Well how about next time you get a planet that can handle the neutron style, LATER N-“
Lmfaooo.
Damn it now I have to delete mine I didn't see this one.
Wut
The real question is, is the simulation powerful enough to render such an explosion?
I don't thinks so
Might cause some lag and and fps drop
Lol
@@danny1229c and power outages
@@danny1229c 😂😂
6:04 how about the gadget? Wasn't it the first nuclear bomb detonated?
imagine creating the strongest bomb to ever be tested and naming it "Ivan"
I know you're joking, but just wanted to add a little more education to it. It's named after Ivan the Terrible, the first Tsar of Russia. He's pretty much universally known to be one of the cruelest and insane rulers of Russia; possibly the world.
Meanwhile nasa : wow... we found a huge mega giants planet! Lets named it kepler
Im gonna question my parents alot about my name
@@feng.mp4 they already named almost every planet in this universe with kepler
@@ivangenov6782 LMAO
Holy shit, the production value is insane.
stfu
@@shoechew someone put the wrong shoe on this morning
@@gracefool
He chewed the wrong one
He narrates with a Russian accent yet his vocabulary is emetic American snowflake-media nonsense verbiage.
@@andreasproteus1465. ... what?
"14.5 hours of pure hell, which is also scientifically equivalent to 1 comedy set performed by Amy Schumer."
Lmao, good one.
Bruh 🤣.
Or one "copsplaining"!
This right here was the most savage bomb
a sure way to get rid of annoying dandruff.
9:43 Sixteen times the detail
"Only 11% of the oceans water would have evaporated"
This is fine
That’s a lot if you really think about it which then will come back down and be rough
*R O O K I E N U M B E R S*
@@meraq2836
Earth: Isn't Vaporized
*R O O K I E N U M B E R S*
Albeit the remaining water would be a boiling hot fish soup.
December 17th, 2043 the "Wasteland" incident
Guy walks into a bar, bartender asks him, "What's new?" Guy answers, " one over lambda."
Physics dad?
@@MonkeyJedi99 Reactor physics, and yes, guilty as charged. Cheers, D.
That's a good'n
F
🤣
Merry christmas to you too Zero...
why does the the most powerful bomb look like the D.M.R. (Dark Matter Reactor) from Q.S.M.L.³ (Quantum Science Multipurpose Laboratories³)?
Yeah, it does.
(also there's more than 1 QSERF player in the comments don't worry)
“That’s it. We’re done here.” Cave, is that you?
I thought of the exact same thing
yeah same
I thought the exact same thing
I thought the exact same thing
My thoughts exactly 😆
if a neutron bomb ever gets made i'd imagine a newspaper headline saying something like "Underwater Cities, Not as Bad as you'd think"
Bioshock
The Chinese have tested neutron bombs , kills everything does not completely wipe out assets.
I.believe the radiation does not last long so you can move in later .
Nobody laughs at aquaman anymore.
We have already made neutron bombs. The bomb in this video is called a Neutrino bomb, or Neutronium bomb.
They’ve been built. They were called “capitalist bombs” by the Soviets because they largely preserve buildings while killing every living being. They did briefly consider using these as defensive devices to deplete the fissile material of an incoming nuclear bomb, but it was considered impractical.
“It could destroy the surface in 1 second.”
What that’s insane?!
“16 times over”
OH.
For the next 611 seconds.. and then finally reach half of its power lol
well then.
@@FreeLeaks Yeah.... that reached ridiculous levels of magnitud quicker than I expected.....
That is my new definition of "overkill"
1 second is highly unlikely unless the heat energy and the shockwave travel at 1/14 of the speed of light. A nuclear explosion blast travels at around 30 km/s. Which is crazy fast but not nearly enough to run half the circumference of the Earth, which is about 20000 km, in one second.
@@Shmalentine I guess it does lol
Meanwhile my manager : You're coming to office today .... right ? ☠
"It is equivalent of 900 pyramids of Giza"
Dear god..
"On a teaspoon"
No..
A cat of culture, you are.
🤯🤯🤯
I get that reference. Just let me have the bucket.
It contains the dying wish of everyone in this room.
On a bucket 🪣
This video makes so many assumptions that it reminded me of an old joke:
"Let us assume that a cow is a perfect sphere and is made entirely of antimatter. From this we can plainly see that cows are the most destructive creatures in existence..."
i agree
I was told its only the spherical frictionless ones that are dangerous.
And what about ducks?
Ducks are destructive too, but not as much as spherical-frictionless cows
Anti matter ducks are a problem... not in our universe thankfully.
My main take away was, how impressively deep and expansive the oceans are.
Yep to survive you would just need to build a submersible that could go down to the bottom of a very deep ocean and wait it out. Altho upon returning to the surface, there would be nothing left in the aftermath, so it would be like you just stepped out on the moon!! 😮
Just think about the fact that the deepest point in the ocean, is something around 1% of the earth's diameter, we are are literally not even scratching the surface.
@@FurtivePigmy right. It is mind boggling. And we only see underground cities in video games and movies (aside from secret gov stuff) .. seems like some missed opportunity.
@@FurtivePigmy plutôt 1 pour mille du diamêtre de la Terre
@@allensmith.aaffect.1626 i think that if we could have lived inside it, we would have already. Oxygen and normal temperatures are the main lacking things..
Is that the DMR 02 from Quantum Science multipurpose laboratories from roblox? 7:23
*Pulls out a comically large tea spoon*
(ʘ‿ʘ)
oh no....
Solar system goes brrrrrrrr
so now we multiply all that by 100
Only a spoonful.
Only spoonful
That one guy who was deep sea diving for the day: “What the hell happened here?”
except for being boiled in the ocean
@@TheJunky228 not if he's deep enough
Although if he was that deep he would probably die of decompression sickness due to the decompression chambers being obliterated
Deep sea diving to skydiving all in a single go
He would need 6 hrs of oxygen tho
Yuuf Eternal not impossible he could bring multiple oxygen tanks with him
2020: Can I have some neutronium?
2021: Only a spoonful!
pulls out a comically large spoon
@@pastalavista2654 destroys the solar system
Fnaf noises
You have it the other way around
When “You’re the bomb” is literally a death sentence.
The sun being the powerful explosion: "look what they need to mimic a fraction of our power"
@Peter Evans lmao there will be no elevators.
@@b.prasad3531 you don’t know that
@Peter Evans The question is whether that is better or worse.
Ok ok ok. I don’t want to be that guy and I know your joking but being a space nerd I just wanna say. The sun is not the most powerful explosion.
@@-sixy- case in point, black hole bombs, and kilonovae
Tsar was designed for a mind shattering 100Mt yield. They purposely halfed it. And even at half power and with a parachute deployed to slow it's decent as much as possible to give the bomber crew time to evacuate the region, the still barely made it out
why didnt they just put it on the ground and detonate it remotely
@@DeadAccount53885 Most of all bombs detonated in the air to reach maximum apogee of destruction area.
Leaving it on the ground will allow energy to be absorbed right into the ground and even though it was hydrogen bomb it would lead to fallout.
@@z1rka127 alright then, why not shoot it out of a missile?
@@z1rka127 They detonated the Tsar at 4000 meters in order to keep it as clean as possible. The optimum height for the Tsar would be 600 meters.
The reason why they did not detonate it on the ground was simple. It would have been way too dirty and problematic.
@@AB-80X Well? Isn't that I writed to previous guy?
“Only” 11% “ of the ocean’s waters will have been -
The rest is a fish stew.
That is not how physics work.. The volume of water is to high for meaningful transfer of energy in this short amount of time.
@@Wayoutthere bro ummm i dont know if you get the joke but just saying facts or you dont get the joke and is saying the actual thing...
@@Forvennm that literally made no sense, also, he is adding onto the "only 11%" there's no misinterpretation of a bad joke, not hard to understand
@@IDK-bg6im oh cool
@@Forvennm thank you
"Explains in great detail math".... ending "literally destroys everything 16x over in 1 second".
This takes the football fields method of measurement to a whole new level
Europeans
I love your profile pic lol
"This is the bomb to worry about?!"
You mean there are bombs we DONT have to worry about.?!
A water bomb?
@@important-disaster2334 good point.
Fireworks
Heh bath bombs
@@Burneth_ toaster