The Dignity of the Devil: New Cardinal Fernandez Document is Heretical and Satanic
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 кві 2024
- A 12-DAY PILGRIMAGE WITH KENNEDY HALL AND FR. ALBERT KALLIO O.P.: www.catholicheritagetours.com...
DONATE TO SCHOOL HERE: olmca.sspx.ca/en/donate-31445
BUY SACRED MUSIC FROM VIDEO HERE: stpeterschoir-newhamburg.band...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @thekennedyreport
SIGN UP FOR MY SUBSTACK: meretradition.substack.com/
SSPX BOOK: www.amazon.com/SSPX-Defence-K...
TKR STORE PRODUCT PAGE: thekennedyreport.com/tkr-06-0...
EMAIL LIST: thekennedyreport.com/?page_id...
DONATE HERE thekennedyreport.com/?page_id...
PATREON: / thekennedyreport
BOOK - Terror of Demons: www.amazon.com/Terror-Demons-...
BOOK - Lockdown with the Devil: www.amazon.com/Lockdown-Devil... - Розваги
We are called to be HOLY, not dignified!
To acknowledge the dignity of all people is the path to holiness. It requires humility, which is extremely difficult for most of us.
Thank you Kennedy for bringing out truth . Many poor souls are being lead astray.
Like those following the Almighty Kennedy Hall and his Pope Lefebvre. Give me a break. Resist the See of Peter at your own souls cost
Oh the irony
Now. Right now, we all need to pray for a new, holy and traditional Pope. Jim
Yes we do! 🙏😭✝️📿
Absolutely. I hope Peter will start to cry and hide his head 🗣️ in shame. Let's go Brandon 🤠
@@paulfaigl8329 Yes.
I think that our good priests should be offering WEEKLY MASSES OF REPARATION for The Formerly Holy Fathers actions. Jim
Yes I agree
Exactly, when training in medicine, one example is, you learn what normal healthy lung & heart sounds are, so you can then identify abnormalities/pathologies.
You study the true to know error!
I’m a nurse and love this analogy. Thank you!
The best way to detect counterfeit money is to spend all your time handling the real thing...
TRUTH! I was a cashier for many years and there was never a counterfeit bill i didn’t know to be counterfeit as soon as my fingers touched it. That’s an excellent analogy for familiarizing yourself with sound doctrinal teachings by consummately reading it and such to keep yourself from falling prey to the false teachers.
That's funny, that's how I came to know the rad-trads were often counterfeit Catholics - by staying close to the Papal Magisterium, I was able to see who does not truly follow it.
@@Jack.JumperYeah, this is kinda nasty. "Satanic??" 🤢🤮🤮🤮
How is that not scandal to say?
It's unbelievable. They don't give a break. First, he came with that doc which wants the church to accept not only the sinner but the sin also. Now this. Lord have mercy on us!🙏💚💛🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷💛💚🙏
Makes sense if we remember Satan never goes on vacation.
Send him bye bye kiss. Pacapapa 😈 needs to go.
Thank you Kennedy. We really are fortunate to have you looking out for us. Arguments against are clear, logical and accurate. Can't thank you enough. Keep shining your light! The darkness must flee!
This is the first thing I noticed when converting, this overemphasis on human dignity is only post V2. Pre-council the church teaches that our dignity is corrupted and that we receive our dignity when we become Christians. Are there any doubts anymore as to whether the evil one has been allowed to infiltrate. God give us Judas’ to test us - it’s time to defend truth in whatever way we can
Amen Amen 🙏
I'm glad Kennedy viewed this so I didn't have to. Thanks Kennedy. 🙏🙏🙏
I went to Catholic School, and I was never taught that man has infinite dignity. I was taught that man has a fallen nature because of original sin. The closest human being to God is the Virgin Mary because she was conceived without sin. I have read that Mary is even above angels because of her humility.
Yes she is Queen of Heaven and Earth🙏🏼🌹
You obviously went to a Catholic school that was still Catholic.
@@Mar--Mar
Obviously both of you missed some newer classes on how to read correctly.
Imagine what St Pope Pius X would think about this document if he were alive
He would submit to it because he was a Saint who submitted to the Church
@@Deuterocomical - No, Pope Saint Pius X would never submit to this nonsensical document (Dignitas Infinita), because it contains a myriad of anti-Christian errors, many of which he himself wrote against, when he was Pope of the Catholic Church. You do not submit to errors, because someone high up in the church, produces & releases an "official document," filled with falsehoods.
@@ChristianSaintSavior Can you give an example of any saint who publicly dissented from the Pope based on alleged errors?
There has never been a time when this watchfulness of the supreme pastor was not necessary to the Catholic body; for, owing to the efforts of the enemy of the human race, there have never been lacking "men speaking perverse things" (Acts xx. 30), "vain talkers and seducers" (Tit. i. 10), "erring and driving into error" (2 Tim. iii. 13). PASCENDI DOMINICI GREGIS
So saying the Pope is preaching heresy is modernist according the St. Pius X.
@@nomassgoer8350 I see how you cunningly committed the preceding/opening sentence/statement before the one you just posted so that it fits with your narrative. Maybe you should read the entire encyclical before cutting and pasting
This is a DANGEROUS document!
Extremely dangerous!,!!
Man-centered! How many homilies in my life have been 90% sociology. I was born in 1955 and during my adolescence the Church overturned my life.
Interesting. I was born in 1990 and because of Summorum Pontificum my parish (which was very dignified and pious for a Novus Ordo parish, our Pastor had been a tank commander in Korea and he was wonderful) began offering Tridentine Masses twice a weekend, which was my introduction to the Traditional Latin Mass, which is now the only kind of Mass I attend. So my adolescence was somewhat opposite to your own, and I’ll always be grateful for having found the Tridentine.
Me as well my friend!
@@Thor-OrionYeah, that's because the Church is changing for the better. The "Sky is Falling" crowd don't want you to know that for some reason.
From St. Benedict Medal: Vade Retro Satana (Begone Satan) Nunquam Suade Mihi Vana (Never Suggest Vain Things to Me), Sunt Mala Quae Libas (What You Offer Me is Evil) Ipse Venena Bibas (Drink your own Poison)
Dr. K is right. We do not have "Infinite Dignity" because of sin and our fallen nature. The elect are being deceived! Are those in Hell enjoying their infinite dignity, or did they debase their dignity?
How can we? Man is finite. We can strive for the perfection of God in thought and deeds. Knowing full well we will always fall short. Maybe when we get our new glorified bodies?
But isn't this just a continuation of JP II's "dignity of man" as a fruit of the Incarnation that was bestowed on mankind without the regenerative waters of Baptism?
30:06 Glad you are bringing this out. This document has shades of Zohar-ism.
@@albertatrafficante4261 Only if you strain the context of JPII's work; JPII is a saint of the Church and I believe rightly so. Unfortunately, we are now living in days of confusion and ambiguity and almost everything the Novus Order has brought has divided us in some way.
We do not have infinite dignity because ONLY GOD IS INFINITE!
Right, Kennedy! The devil mixes truth with lies. If something has clear error in it at all, then giving credence to any of it would be putting ourselves in a very bad predicament of possibly (likely) being confused or misled. This is why the devil mixes the both (truth and falsity).
As to the Noveau Theologie, I’ll give you a quote from my dad, “I don’t have to take a bite out of a cow pie to know that it tastes like sh*t.”
🤣🤣🤣 that made me howl! Exactly right!
And Kennedy, kudos!
Good one.
Liberals sprinkle cinnamon on a cowpie and tell us it is a pecan pie. That sums up what comes out of the Vatican today.
Hahaha 🤣 spot on.
@@lnelsoncpaAnd me !
Only by knowing the Truth, can one discern the errors and lies.
There is no meaning to the so-called brotherhood of man without the common fatherhood of God.
40:57 This incompletion of God is the heart of Jewish mysticism.
A humanist would define dignity as "a state or quality of being worthy of honour or respect." A Catholic would define dignity in spiritual terms, that, having been made in God's image, every person has an innate human dignity that neither our innate sinfulness, nor anyone external to us can take away. Either way, both definitions rely upon those external to us to recognise ones dignity, and is therefore a moral conundrum for those who fail to recognise it. The distinction between humanist and Catholic definitions is important, because the latter allows for "God's image" to be infinitely valued and dignified. To not see that infinite dignity is the real heresy here.
You're right. I can plainly see this document is so they can push against the death penalty even more, but calling it "Satanic" is slander and scandal.
If we had infinite dignity, we wouldn't need salvation. To propose that says there is no sin. Catholic theology 101. I'm getting tired of being talked to by The Pope and Cardinal Fernandez like I am a guppy and will just fall for anything. It's insulting let alone heretical.
Seriously.
Wrong. Christ gave us infinite dignity. Read the document
There are a lot of uncatechised guppies.
@@matthewschmidt5069 He did not give us infinite dignity and if that were the case, we would not have needed His sacrifice in the first place. The document is wrong.
@@candaceorr7517 you conflate infinite dignity with infinite goodness
So glad you’re back Kennedy!!!
I remember listening to multiple sermons and conferences by different traditional priests regarding movies and media. They always says, by the principle of the integral good, if a movie has one instance of evil in it, it doesn't matter if the rest is okay, a Catholic must not watch it.
So yes, throw this document out. It is no good.
Shakespeare depicts evil. The Bible also depicts evil. Should we not read Shakespeare or the Bible?
Dr K knocks it out of the park ….. for the 60 millionth time!
Kennedy, relative to "infinite dignity"...
This is an original English translation of St. John Paul IIs Angelus from 1980, that first footnote in DI:
"This love is the basis of our hope and the breath of our life. God showed us just how much he loves each and every person in an unsurpassable way through Jesus Christ, and how immense a dignity[2] is conferred on each person through him. It is precisely those of you who must be hurting with a physical disability or spiritual suffering should recognize yourselves as friends of Jesus who are loved in a special way[3] by him"
"how immense a dignity" is the original, NOT infinite
Quia parvus error in principio magnus est in fine
St. Thomas Aquinas got it right.
JP Ii made no distinction between those who remain in the state of Original Sin and those who were "Born Again" through the regenerative waters of Baptism and entered into the only Ark of Salvation. Jesus instituted the Sacraments to elevate us from a mere natural earthly existence to an earthly supernatural existence in preparation of our heavenly abode. In other words, Jesus restored the dignity of man through the Sacramental system.
May God bless us and have mercy on us.
Yeah when people like Tucho use words like "infinite," it's best to hold on to one's wallet.
:DDD
Another reason to ignore his ban on the Latin Mass.
"Be vigilant in act and word, so that the faithful may grow in love for this Holy See, venerate it, and accept it with complete obedience; they should execute whatever the See itself teaches, determines, and decrees" -Inter Multiplices 7, Pius IX
@@matthewschmidt5069 "If we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel other than what you received, let him be anathema." St Paul, Galatians 1.
"Beware of false teachers who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruit." Jesus Christ.
@jasonperez4975 Good quote. It doesn't contradict mine since "the See of Peter remains unblemished by any error" (Pastor Aeternus 4)
@@matthewschmidt5069 What a terrifying position for you to be in, given that your overlord, Bergoglio, is detestable heretic and a false teacher 😬
So if we will know them by their fruits (which is true), then what does it say about Pope Francis? Let’s take a quick look at his fruits. He removed a predator from the collage of Cardinals. The abuse crisis is at an all time low in the Catholic Church. But the abuse crisis is going strong in the SSPX. (CNA Apr 11, 2024). That alone disproves your argument.
This is not the same as when St. Irenaeus says the Glory of God is man fully alive, living in Theosis
Isn't that beautiful?
I came to the same conclusion early in my conversion, that if the person writing or teaching is proclaiming something contrary to the Catholic faith I couldn't trust anything they said. For instance, when Bishop B told Ben Shapiro that the Catholic church was the "privileged way" to salvation not the only way, how then can I trust anything else he teaches? So sad!
the Fern Doc is an exact ditto deep understanding of "Do as thy wilt shall be the whole of the law"
Oh noooo! Crowleyism.
Dr Kennedy I am a conservative Catholic, converted to Catholicism 45 years ago, I love TLM and I am definitely a traditionalist. However, the hyperbole here is a bit much. Let's just say Pope Francis is not the most cerebral fellow who has ever held the papacy. But from the devil is a bit much. Yes, infinite dignity is kind of going off the deep end. We participate in infinite dignity but we do not have infinite dignity. But can we look at the good things? Can we look at the purpose of this document?
The Pope has to deal with the fact that people, Christians in many cases, all over the world are being persecuted because they wish to have the freedom to worship as Christians and Catholics. This is for the consumption of the world not just the Catholic world. There is a broader concern here and this is not primarily to teach dogmatic theology.
Yes, there are a lot of good things in it. A rebuke of far left liberalism ideas of transgenderism and surrogacy. Pope Francis has not made any infallible pronouncements. He has not changed anything in the catechism of the Catholic Church that I am aware of other than a proscription against capital punishment. He has not promoted gay marriage, he has said that homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered and sinful, he has changed no teaching about the Trinity or the necessity of the Catholic Church or the understanding of salvation.
For those of you constantly critical of Pope Francis, and there is much to be critical of, how are you not Protestants? If you are Catholic take the logs out of your own eyes before you try to take the sliver out of the eye of the holy father. How much pride are you exhibiting by constantly berating everything Francis does. Francis's namesake St Francis was not a doctrinal theologian. He was a pastor who sometimes went dancing and singing to mass. Yet we still consider him a Saint.
I am very frustrated with the limits on the traditional Latin mass. But perhaps if all of the radical traditionalists had not continued to claim that the new form of the mass was invalid we would still have the traditional Latin mass widely available. Instead of simply availing themselves of the TLM the radical traditionalists had to shout from the rooftops how the Novus Ordo was invalid, as if there had been no changes to the mass since it was first described by St Justin Martyr.
I attend a church where the Novus Ordo is done beautifully. It is sacred and beautiful with incense and a communion rail ad orientem, with the our father prayed in Latin. It is every bit as reverent as the TLM I attend on occasion. The abuses that entered the church after Vatican 2 were never intended by the council. They have been part and parcel due to the degradation of society that has occurred and was occurring during the 60s and 70s. Through all of those abuses the church has consistently been pro life, and has Held to the traditional view of marriage and continues to teach that divorce is not permissible. Look over to our Eastern brothers in the Orthodox Church and you will see that there are many ways in which they have not kept the faith as well, even though they have maintained their traditional liturgy.
I would urge you to be part of the solution and not part of the problem. Your frustration and anger and quite frankly the tendency for prideful belief that you are a higher teaching authority than the pope, are qualities that are not helping people to come to God. It seems as though you are promoting schism. The Catholic Church has had bad popes in the past we have simply not been alive to see them. The Catholic Church has survived. Teaching is intact. The body and blood of our lord is still available to you from the altars of the church. Please don't be like the Orthodox who claim that everything that is explained either by definition or not exactly in the way that they explain it even if the belief is the same is heresy.
Does that mean I don't think that we have a right to criticize? Not at all. But in love and with unity in the Catholic Church. This pope is near the end of his reign. I have attended rather traditional churches and there has been some concern and criticism but mostly there has been love and fidelity. I am receiving the same Eucharist. Hearing the same teaching especially the same dogmatic theology. If anything younger priests are more conservative now.
Francis has not enriched himself, he does not have concubines, he is not a secret homosexual, he is a man who cannot live up to the intellectual power of his predecessors. This too shall pass. I remember way back 45 years ago when becoming Catholic I attended a mass where the homily was a black-face dance. I stood up and shouted sacrilege and walked out. Forty five years later that church is now quite traditional. There is hope.
I was not happy with Fiducia Supplicans. But not for what you might think. Priests have always blessed people in irregular circumstances. We go to Mass and we see someone who crosses their arms in front of their chest and receives a blessing and we have no idea what their circumstances are. I was the recipient of such a blessing when as a young non observant Jewish man who was quite promiscuous a priest offered me a blessing. Four years after that blessing I was accepted into the Catholic Church. That led me to be a Catholic man, a Catholic husband, a Catholic father, a Catholic physician, a past president of Oregon Right to Life, and a life devoted to Jesus Christ and our Catholic Church.
Where would I be had I not received that blessing? I believe this is what Francis is hoping for. He has not claimed that homosexual unions are licit, but he is hoping for the conversion of those people. He continues to confirm that the practice of homosexuality is a sin. He has repeatedly said that homosexuality is disordered. There are many other sins that you seem not to have concentrated on. Along with homosexuals he believes in blessing people who are in irregular circumstances. He is hoping for the conversion of those people. No interaction means no conversion.
In 1986 the church wrote: "It is deplorable that homosexual persons have been and are the object of violent malice in speech or in action. Such treatment deserves condemnation from the Church's pastors wherever it occurs. It reveals a kind of disregard for others which endangers the most fundamental principles of a healthy society. The intrinsic dignity of each person must always be respected in word, in action and in law." In word, in action and in law. Was that a support for laws respecting the legal rights homosexuals? Yes, there was criticism of that too at the time.
Clearly, Francis is hoping for the gentle conversion of those people. The transformation of what they think is love into actual love. Maybe he did not go about it the right way. But he is trying and is still saying that homosexuality is intrinsically disordered and homosexual acts are sinful. He is trying to be more like a parent of a homosexual person which must be a horrible situation to be in. However, he is not condoning homosexuality, promoting homosexual unions other than their legal protection as humans, and has condemned the idea of homosexual marriage.
Francis is pastoral at the expense of being doctrinal. You are being doctrinal at the expense of being pastoral. Love without truth is licentiousness, truth without love is cruelty. From this conservative Catholic to you, please be less judgmental. You would catch a lot more flies with honey than with vinegar. We must never shy away from decrying sin, but we must always reach out to the sinner.
Some years ago I had appeared on television and of course in public regarding debates on abortion, of course as the pro life proponent. All of these debates are making me want to start a youtube channel of my own as a Catholic medical doctor. I am not sure I have the energy for such things at this age. However, I do have the energy to talk and debate. I would welcome the chance to speak with you either in private or on your channel to talk about ways in which we can criticize in a helpful manner at the same time as supporting in a constructive manner.
God Bless.
Ever hear of Peronism? If not, it's worked superlative wonders on you.
@@LUIS-ox1bv You know that's what's kind of sickening about some of my fellow Catholics. They are very quick to insult. I am as far from that as possible. I'm just a bit more charitable than you. I don't suppose you've heard judge not lest ye be judged. I'm happy to engage in meaningful dialog. I don't engage with people who throw insults with no evidence.
Pope Francis did not have to change teachings on gay marriage, he has set about to change belief.
I'm no FBI forensic psychologist who investigates serial killers. But you don't necessarily have to change a written teaching--or Constitutional Law in the United States--to change beliefs of the laity or citizenry. You can Piped Piper their children to their deaths.
A mostly life long residency on the North Side of Milwaukee makes it difficult to have unabandoned trust, to do so would result sooner than later in being victimized financially, or sexually, or with serious bodily, or with death.
My Struggle (Mein Kampf) is not to see 11 of the 12 as Judas's. Some have the opposite struggle, they find it difficult to even imagine 1 Judas among the 12.
I suppose we want the more cynical person as the homicide investigator. The world is full of wolves. Someone is always trying to sucker you, oh and women rank among the most, or trying to lure you as food on their plate for that night's dinner 🍽️.
Is Pope Francis an active serial killer of Catholic souls? 🤔 I don't know. If I had a teenage daughter, physically attractive, I would not trust Joe Biden alone with her, and I'm not sure how much trust I place in Jorge Bergoglio with the souls of roughly 1 billion Catholics.
🤔 Consider the reasoning you gave for Pope Francis. Saudi Arabia and China do not subscribe to Pope Francis's Christian beliefs nor to Catholic belief in the office of the Papacy, but those 2 nations will what... magically believe his teaching that religious freedom is the way to go? 🤔 And Jorge Bergoglio will achieve this by how? Promoting more Mohammadans populate Europe and more Christian churches shut down, Christian numbers decline, and Pope Francis guides the young children of Catholics to The World, The Devil, and The Flesh?
I could be wrong and Pope Francis is doing the will of God. If so then mea culpa on my part, as a thief on a cross. But 🤔 it all strikes me as serial killer-ish. Deception it would seem to me must become a honed craft of a good serial killer for any such killer who wishes to extend the longevity of his predations.
This was wonderfully-said. Much better than I would've done with it! I was annoyed by the decree, but hearing this clown call it "Satanic" made my blood boil. I'm just going to call these people Protestants. They're the ones who think he's the Antichrist, after all!
@@frankrosenbloomAlso, don't quote that "judge not" verse out of context. Very cringe.
I feel very blessed to have Kennedy ‘ Dr K ‘ and many others to explain the faith ‘ and these documents that come out of the Vatican’ and to take the time to read the documents ‘ which can be a lot of work
Wolves in sheep's clothing can come from any side and the devil does not work from just one direction.
Martin Luther called the Pope obsessed with "diabolic affairs" (Smalcald Articles). That the Church had been without a Pope for 500 years and claimed the Pope was a "child of the devil" aimed at its destruction. (Against the Papacy at Rome).
Similar sounding arguments 500 years later by devout Catholic men today. So was Luther wrong or right?
His followers claim a man as their "founder" and hence they are Lutherans and many "Catholic traditionalists" claim a man as their religious namesake. Let alone the "Old Catholics" who came before them after Vatican I.
I studied a lot of Hegel, Kant, Hume, Balthasar, de Lubac, et al. in undergrad. It was useful to know precisely why they were wrong, but even then, it's not that useful to a layman. It got me an A in my studies, but I have no real use for it in my ordinary discussions about the faith, even with those who use the above as their foundation.
I too studied all of the above mentioned horrible philosophers/theologians during my graduate theological studies ( must not forget Rahner! Although we should!) Thank God for the sanity of St. Thomas Aquinas and orthodox Catholic Fathers and Doctors.
@@ursusthewhite9824 You are so right. Look at the postings here! Its shocking that some are catholic.The ignorance is appalling.
I didn't go to university but I studied on my own all these authors. The post conciliar popes definitively incorporated these philosophers and theologians in their teachings,which have put the Catholic Church in terrible crisis.
Moreover, since subjection to the Roman pontiff is necessary for salvation for all Christ's faithful" -Lateran V
"As we read in another place, the person who abandons the teaching of the Roman pontiff cannot be within the church" -Lateran V
@@matthewschmidt5069 I believe in the authority of the pope. Big difference when pope is not doing God's will and teaching heresy. not obligated.There are impediments to the teachings the popes are bound to protect the deposit of faith.
"Be vigilant in act and word, so that the faithful may grow in love for this Holy See, venerate it, and accept it with complete obedience; they should execute whatever the See itself teaches, determines, and decrees" -Inter Multiplices 7, Pius IX
Can. 217 Since they are called by baptism to lead a life in keeping with the teaching of the gospel, the Christian faithful have the right to a Christian education by which they are to be instructed properly to strive for the maturity of the human person and at the same time to know and live the mystery of salvation.
@@KGraceSpeaksKea1335 cool
Matthew, when he used the term "whatever the See itself teaches, determines and decrees", our Holy Father Pius IX certainly was not thinking of a pope who counsels the faithful to commit sin.
@@anng.4542counsel? You mean "authoritatively teach through the magisterium", and yea, im sure no one ever thought the Catholic Church can authoritatively teach heresy... why? Because that destroys the dogma of the indefectibility of the church, and that would be heresy
@anng.4542 Except no Pope has done that and who are you to judge the Pope
This document is not from the devil.
Disobedience to God's voice (who speaks through his Church) is from the devil.
You will answer for misleading many people away from God.
Bergoglio never misses an opportunity to insult the Blessed Mother. Then, Tucho has the gall to demand our submission to his heresy. Fortunately, many of us are not that gullible out here.
You would b e surprised.
Apert from any doctrinal issues, you can't give assent of the intellect to a document that contradicts itself. That is insanity, and endorsing insanity is NOT part of obedience.
@@Mar--Mar You are exactly right.
None of you read it, and I highly doubt any of you know the definition of heresy
@@matthewschmidt5069Heresy is things I don't like. I'm gonna disrespect the Pope now to show how Catholic I am! 😈😈
So we can 'Leave the question of grave error and heresy up to the Theologians'.....
But just not authentic Catholic Teaching from the Papal Magisterium.... apparently...
Seems a weird thing for a Catholic to say....
"Catholic"
This isn't authentic. Didn't you read 2 Hezekiah 4:20?
"If Kennedy doesn't like it, it's not Catholic teaching."
In the past, heresy was refuted by the Church fathers to guide the uneducated. Today, the heresies actually originate from the Vatican assuming the faithful are still uneducated, and are thankfully refuted by scholars like yourself, Dr K, Dr Marshall and many others.
Soooo... The gates of Hell have prevailed against the Church Christ supposedly founded.
This right here is how the elect are deceived.
Protestant theology maintains the image and likeness of God in humans was destroyed by Original Sin. Catholic theology says that image was marred but NOT destroyed. That image cannot be destroyed by anything we do. The pain of hell is knowing we were created for union with God for all eternity and we will never live in keeping with our infinite dignity.
Hey, that actually makes sense!
(What are you doing here??)
These guys refuse to say “Holy Holy Holy”, rather they cry out “man man man”. 666 anyone?
I never looked at it that way. Good point.
It is not the dignity accruing to us on account of our fallen nature that is being referenced in Dignitas Infinita. It is the dignity of our unfallen, or pre-fallen, nature. As creatures made in the image of God, who is himself of infinite dignity, there was in the beginning no blemish or evil present in us to limit our dignity as part of his perfect creation*. But through sin, our dignity (along with that of the whole world) suffered and became limited.
This, however, is not the end of the story, for by the infinite sacrifice of the Son of Man we were given power to once again become children of God--i.e. to be restored to our infinite, sinless dignity. Every fallen man shares in that glorious possibility until he is judged, and it is this potential for (re)perfection that forms the basis of Dignitas Infinita.
(*) i.e. while we did not share equality with God in terms of power, knowledge, etc., we did share in his infinite dignity as bearers of his perfect image.
“Domine, non sum dignus ut intres sub tectum meum:
Sed tantum dic verbo et sanabitur anima mea. “
Dignitas Inifinita - 22 Pages, 12,694 words. Pascendi Dominici Gregis - 32 Pages, 21,681 words. By your own analogy, since I found this error at the beginning of your video, I can safely disregard the remainder.
That's not a theological error, so you can't.
NIce to see that the works of father Alvaro Calderón is reaching beyond spanish/portuguese traditional audiences. He is one of the most complete theologians and
Tomist in our century.
@29:49 Concerning modern art, a recent "coffee klutch" freebie has the following:
Customer: "I suppose you call this modern art?" Art dealer: "No, it's a mirror".
It exalts humans to such an extent that you can’t correct another human let alone punish them for wrongdoing. I believe it also summarizes salvation into a purely works based theory. How you treat your fellow man will decide if you get to heaven rather than your belief, acceptance, and obedience to Christ.
Care to post quotes from the document to back this claim?
None of that is in the document. Stop being a Protestant
Anthony Stine read a letter from a traditional Priest who mentioned that paragraph 2 of this document recognizes the UN Charter on Human Rights as being a part of Church teachings.
Thank you Kennedy, the truth is that God the Father is the one who gave me life and sustains my life and Jesus is my Saviour. God bless you and your family always and forever.
The Catechism of The Catholic Church paragraph #675:
“Before Christ's second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the "mystery of iniquity" in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth. The supreme religious deception is that of the Antichrist, a pseudo-messianism BY WHICH MAN GLORIFIES HIMSELF IN THE PLACE OF GOD AND OF HIS MESSIAH COME IN THE FLESH.”
I think this document is “sealing the deal” with the devil.
You're not Catholic then
"Be vigilant in act and word, so that the faithful may grow in love for this Holy See, venerate it, and accept it with complete obedience; they should execute whatever the See itself teaches, determines, and decrees" -Inter Multiplices 7, Pius IX
@@matthewschmidt5069 this document in not catholic.
@@TheNarrowGate101so the Magisterium is evil, harmful to souls, and not Catholic.
Okay. Tell me why u think i should be a catholic when this goes against the indefectibility of the church? The heresy here is people like kennedy saying things that logically leads to heresy if you think it through
@@TheNarrowGate101 Prove it.
@@matthewschmidt5069 Kennedy just explained it. Didn’t you watch the video? The opening line of the document is what the last sentence in paragraph 675 of the catechism of the Catholic Church warns us is coming as the religious deception of the Antichrist.
Personalism is mentioned in this document.
In Personalism , in a nutshell, all subjective views together form the reality!
Personalism considers all the subjective views as true, therefore no one is ever wrong esp. as regards their ideas about their identity. I think this is the lens through which they look at the workd
...world*
How can you claim that a magisterial document is from Satan while also claiming to not be in schism?
He can't. He's basically a Protestant.
Father Calderón explains in his "La Lámpara Bajo el Celemín" book that none documents since Vatican II are magisterial. They base their "althority" on the "peaple of God " not in the power given by Jesus to Peter and his successors. Basicly they gave up the power but not lost it.
God bless all of you.
The document distinguishes and clarifies between four different concepts of dignity. Each human shares in this ontological dignity because they were willed into existence and because they were made in the image and likeness of God(Genesis1:26-27).
The document makes this very clear;
[Dignitas Infinita] 11. Biblical Revelation teaches that all human beings possess inherent dignity because they are created in the image and likeness of God: “God said, ‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness’ […] So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them” (Gen. 1:26-27). [Dignitas Infinita]
There is nothing, 'Satanic,' about this document. I suggest you stop deliberately trying to mislead your audience.
Yes, there is. It deliberately forgets the Original Sin and the subsequent fallen nature of Man that keeps him always on the verge of Temptation.
@@AsturGalicia - Did you even read the document? Despite the document not even being about original sin, a reference is indeed there in regards to the temptation our first parents succumb to in relation to original sin.
[Dignitas Infinita]57. Regarding gender theory, whose scientific coherence is the subject of considerable debate among experts, the Church recalls that human life in all its dimensions, both physical and spiritual, is a gift from God. This gift is to be accepted with gratitude and placed at the service of the good. Desiring a personal self-determination, as gender theory prescribes, apart from this fundamental truth that human life is a gift, *AMOUNTS TO A CONCESSION TO THE AGE-OLD TEMPTATION TO MAKE ONESELF GOD, ENTERING INTO COMPETITION WITH THE TRUE GOD OF LOVE REVEALED TO US IN THE GOSPEL.* [Dignitas Infinita]
Genesis3:4 But the serpent said to the woman, “You will not die; 5 for God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, *AND YOU WILL BE LIKE GOD,* [a] knowing good and evil.”
That is in the section addressing, 'Gender Theory.' Most likely because people in the transgender community often refer to themselves in the plural using, 'they, them,' etc, or identifying themselves as, 'gender fluid.' Only the triune God can refer to himself in the plural, so that part of the document has deep theological significance.
Humans aren't infinite. They're finite creatures, just like the angels are. Your misleading yourself.
@@dianneraimondi8382 - The soul is _eternal,_ and it will be reunited with the body at the general judgment for those who have died before Christ returns. That goes for the damned as well as those who are in Heaven. Likewise the angels who fell as well as those who were obedient will suffer or enjoy eternal bliss or torment. All this is Catholicism 101, so I've no idea what you are talking about.
@@Sean-lv6fxI think they must be larpers, right?
Church gave up trying to change the world. They let the world change them
Thanks - great show 🔥👏😎!
God bless, Ave Maria 🙏⛪⚓👑.
Kennedy,
I'm not quite sure what is meant by "dignity".
Would you please give us a definition?
I have a sneaking suspicion that the modernists will claim a definition that's not accurate in the way that they claim that a couple is not a union.
Kennedy didn't read the document nor account for the distinctions made within it
There is a definition in the document. It's not what Kennedy made up.
Thank you!!!!!
I completely agree with your opinion about pitching books that contain even a whiff of error.
We all have infinite dignity in Jesus Christ. INRIX
+JMJ Thank you Kennedy. This anthropocentric document very much like the Novus Ordo undermines man with its claims. We must stay close to the Lord. O Virgin Mother of God, we fly to your protection and beg your intercession against the darkness and sin which ever more envelop the world and menace the Church.
Absolutely agree🙏🏻
Excellent interpretation. God bless you and give you even more wisdom to elucidate these documents which are deceitful and deceiving. Thank you!
Intepretation of what? He doesn't even read the document or it's distinctions
God Bless you and the truth tellers
Why is the name "Michael" interpreted as a question? Why isn't it interpreted as a description?
Dr. K and your good self have hit the nail on the head, and non academics can understand clearly what you are saying. The title did it for me, no point trying to do mental gymnastics to understand it. Best to go and pray, before you get annoyed !
Do what thou will. Sounds like alister crowly and anton levey.
And Luther
Do what thou will...
What? The document explicitly condemns that
@@RedeemedCatholicNo, you see, if you don't read it, then you don't have to see what it says, and then you can make stuff up and slander the Pope and the Church.
You're going about this "Catholicism" thing all wrong. You could learn a thing or two from these future sedevacantists.
Wow! Thank you for yoyr wonderful explanations of this document. 😊
Too many errors in the document. The first line in the introduction is already erroneous. "Every human person possesses an infinite dignity..."
God alone has infinite dignity. If man has infinite dignity, we would not need a redeemer. If we had infinite dignity, we would be able to satisfy God's justice through our own penance. Christ had to shed his blood since only His sacrifice has infinite value. Also, if God has infinity dignity and man has infinity dignity, does that make us equal to God in dignity? That sounds idolatrous to me.
Religious freedom is also problematic. Evil religions do not have a right to exist. If your a Catholic you believe that other religions can be tolerated but truly only the true religion has the inherit right to exist, the religion that Christ founded, Catholicism.
"Here, one should also mention the death penalty, for this also violates the inalienable dignity of every person, regardless of the circumstances." This line is also problematic. It sounds like the document is condemning all use of the death penalty, for example such as in the middle ages which catholic teaching says that the state had a right to administer, not only for the safety of the people but for the sake of justice. This is a complete contradiction.
A person who murders violates the dignity of others, therefore the murderer loses some of his rights and hence his dignity in the moral sense and gets to be thrown in prison. The death penalty can be imposed if the state deems fit. The murderer certainly does not have infinite dignity.
"For Jesus, the good done to every human being, regardless of the ties of blood or religion, is the single criterion of judgment." The is also an error. You cannot merit heaven by good works alone but also by faith. This ignores the reality of the need of Baptism, the need of a savior, and the need of sanctifying grace which justifies us and turns our goods works into great value.
Islam is an evil sociopolitical ideology masked as a religion. Just my opinion. It should not exist.
Fr ripperger said good works done without sanctifying grace are nothing. /no merit/But could through actual grace lead to conversation.
So, if there are incorrect statements in a document, then the entire document is suspect and should not be esteemed? I agree with that. If the head of an organization behaves is such a way as to degrade the integrity of the organization, and the organization allows that, it follows, that we should not follow that organization.
Don't follow the freemasons or heretics. Follow the one, true Catholic Church.
Don't follow the heretics and Conciliar Church. Follow the Traditional and One, True , Apostolic Catholic Church
@@patrickmeyer2598 Through discernment and study we can distinguish the wolves from the true shepherds. God gave us an intellect. Heretics are technically outside the Catholic Church. Modernism, Pelagianism, and the denial of a redeemer or baptism are all heresies.
@@patrickmeyer2598 Through discernment and study, we can distinguish the wolves from the true shepherds. God gave us an intellect. Technically heretics are outside the Catholic Church. Modernism, Pelagianism, the denial of a redeemer or Baptism are all heresies.
@@patrickmeyer2598 Technically heretics are outside the Catholic Church.
Many thanks for elucidating this latest promulgation!
Yet he doesn't read it 🤔
Man’s infinite dignity is religion of Kabbala , where nature is God, and through evolution, man is the perfection of nature, and it is ongoing, to transcend man into transhumanism
It is contexted in the "human rights" of humanism as-opposed-to the law of God of Christianity.
Lol 99% of people in these comments haven’t even read the document. Probably including Mr. Hall
True. He hates everything Francis writes or does
Agree 💯🏴👍🏻🍀
Oxford definition of Dignity:
the state or quality of being worthy of honor or respect.
Is this not just reinforcing of the basic principle that Jesus makes throughout the Bible that we love our neighbor? Or Matthew 6:14, Matthew 18:21-22, Mark 11:25, Hebrews 8:12, Daniel 9:9. Etc. the point being, we are called to forgive because we have dignity and those who have sinned have that same dignity. Sure others can intrude on another’s dignity, but what is more Catholic of us? To condemn them to death, or to forgive and understand their grave mistake and let them know (as Jesus did with many sinners) that they have a place in God’s kingdom (so long as they confess these sins honestly).
Wait, man being made in the image of God is a heretical thing to say?
...you sure, Hall?
Being made in the image of God and man having infinite dignity are two VERY different statements. The latter IS heresy, yes.
@@annemary9680 They're the same statement
You sure you want to use Strawman arguments?
@@RayMack-xz7xg Strawman? Apply the phrase "infinite dignity of the human person according to their nature" to the closest thing that we know about man: he is made in the image and likeness of God. And because God knows Himself in trinity, man knows himself to be an expression of God, and therefore knows he is "worthy" of God (that is, made for union with God), who makes us worthy of Himself through Christ.
I don't want to come off as rude or blunt, but it seems to be the only way to express things... any contest with the phrase "infinite dignity of the human person" is pure piss and whinery.
I'm still wrestling through some of the points you bring up, I don't want to dismiss your critique nor do I want to avoid reasoning through what Dignitas Infinita is presenting.
The way I understood the use of the phrase "infinite dignity" is in the context of the second part of the sentence where a person's dignity "prevails in and beyond every circumstance, state, or situation the person may ever encounter." Infinite in the sense of not bound or contained by external circumstances where in all times and all places man has dignity that cannot be denied. Maybe that sentence isn't make the case that our dignity is equal to God's?
In the document, they do condemn conflating man to be like God "Desiring a personal self-determination, as gender theory prescribes, apart from this fundamental truth that human life is a gift, amounts to a concession to the age-old temptation to make oneself God, entering into competition with the true God of love revealed to us in the Gospel." Elsewhere it says "Thus, it would be a grave error to think that by distancing ourselves from God and his assistance, we could somehow be freer and thus feel more dignified. Instead, detached from the Creator, our freedom can only weaken and become obscured."
I haven't read the entirety of the akacatholic post but based off of what you shared, I don't think there's as much of a contradiction as there appears to be. For one, having infinite human dignity doesn't mean we don't need God. "But God proves his love for us in that while we were still sinners Christ died for us" Romans 5:8. We have some sort of inherent worth (which we could call dignity?) that was enough for God to die for us. Through baptism, we are given the dignity of being adopted sons and daughters, an elevation from our inherent human dignity.
Similarly, the quote from Pius XII is from an encyclical on The Sacred Liturgy so I'm not sure you can compare the statements made by Pius XII and those in the Dignitas Infinita since they're teaching on two different topics. The dignity Pius XII referring to is participating in the priesthood of Christ. A dignity that can only be received from Baptism. In paragraph 88 he says "Nor is it to be wondered at, that the faithful should be raised to this dignity. By the waters of baptism, as by common right, Christians are made members of the Mystical Body of Christ the Priest, and by the "character" which is imprinted on their souls, they are appointed to give worship to God. Thus they participate, according to their condition, in the priesthood of Christ."
In the quoted 104 paragraph he's talking about the dignity of actively participating at Mass by being, "most closely united with the High Priest and His earthly minister, at the time the consecration of the divine Victim is enacted, and at that time especially when those solemn words are pronounced, "By Him and with Him and in Him is to Thee, God the Father almighty, in the unity of the Holy Ghost, all honor and glory for ever and ever".
Is there anything else other than the use of the term "infinite" that people have a problem with?
May God have mercy on the whole world
Mr. Heresy is at it again !!
It's not proper to say, that "we are God"; but, that we are "of God". INRIX
You're point about "reading all of the modernist junk just so you can truly understand it" makes me think of Mormon logic. They always say, "just pray that the Holy Spirit will show you that the Book of Mormon is true." Why would I do that if I already know that it is false? It makes no sense.
🙏
Thank you Kennedy, always good. 🙏🙏🙏☘️☘️
Well it started in v2 lumen gentium 22 paragraph 2 I guess that states that by the mere incarnation of christ every human being gained an infinite dignity... then with jp2 in humanum redemptoris wich restates it in a way........... instead of saying that being holy within the church and thru christ redemption we gain this eternal dignity! Eternal dignity without holiness + church + christ's redemption is the passport to sin (and bless.sin) and get away with it....
Thank you Kennedy!!!
We are not born again in Baptism. We are freed of Original sin in Baptism.
We are born again through the Sacrifice of Jesus on the Cross and redeemed by the resurrection of Jesus’ body by fulfillment of prophetic revelations about Him from God to through the prophet’s. And not judged until Jesus returns. Will we then be immortal with Our God or not?
But we have not clarified which is physical death due to sin or which is spiritual death due to sin.
@2:48 " . . yellow and green ink, because everything was worth REMEMBERING" . .
Mr. Kennedy, I'm a Grandpa and well into my "senior" years, but also -with my BA in
philosophy and English -a "veteran" of highlighting -yellow, green, blue -required
reading during university years. Highlighting is NO SUBSTITUTE for REAL memory!
Only MEMORY is. And now that I AM a "senior" me memory is even shorter, even
should I highlight a printed passage or the whole book or article. REAL MEMORY is
a treasure of the pre-internet past. Mary, Mother of the Church, is also known by the
title "Memory of the Church"; only quill and ink existed in her day, plus nothing is
recorded that Mary of Nazareth ever penned even one syllable. The Digital highway
has brought us speed of communications, speed in reading, speed of speech, and
speed "on rubber" @ 75 mph.
But speed in highlighting the print that one is reading is no guarantee that my
memory will RETAIN and ABSORB what I've highlighted . . EXCEPT FOR that fraction
of minutes I've taken to do the highighting.
In my "senior" years I've noticed that new viewing/ reading material becomes Ancient
History the minute I've moved to the next item before me on the "Information Highway".
So . . now I'm back in your [ very welcome and informative/ formative ] podcast.
Thank you for that !!
What the hell even is this comment?? 😂😂
please do not lift and interpret text outside of the whole document. also, this document never claims to be separate from the entirety of Church teaching.
I agree all humans have infinite dignity.Yes God is always getting better infinitely creating better after each creation.
Rubbish.
Anyone have the link to get Prometheus? Tried to find it but can't seem to locate any place where it can be purchased.
Angelus press, also available as ebook
Haven't we got infinite existence, because our lives will never be extinguished. We will live for all eternity.
Yes
Shame on you criticising the Pope. "Roma locuta, causa finita est". ( St Agustan).
@@josephinebennett6772 I'm not? 🤔🧐
It seems to have a thread of Kabbalah too.
“Pleased to meet you. Hope you guess my name.” - Tucho (probably)
This is straight up herasy. I am so tired of debating whether or not these things are in error. That is a waste of time. We can no more belong to a church which teaches these errors then we can belong to any other false religion or worldly belief system. So, what are we to do now? We need answers...
"Stand fast and hold to the traditions you have learned, either by our word, or by our epistle." 2 Thess 2:15. 😊
Believe in God and Carry a Stick (that`s for Tucho) 😅
It’s not a waste of time, God could be using it for the sanctification of souls because they will read these kind of things then respond with the truth, drawing them closer to God. If it were so easy, how would we grow in sanctity?
"We can no more belong to a church which teaches these errors"...
And this is why these fake traditionals are dangerous. Because Allen here connects the dots that this goes against the indefectibility of the Church and refutes catholicism...
Rather take a step back and harmonise the magisterium, instead of listening to people like kennedy which will lead you into schism
Do you even know the definition of heresy?
Jesus only spoke and lived the truth. He didn’t teach errors and then explain why they were errors.
In quantum physics, a photon seems to be in two places at the same time?
If we have infinite dignity then there is no need for salvation and our Lord’s sacrifice was in vain!
How so? 😂 infinite dignity not goodness
@43:00 ff So . . deifying Man is a REFUSAL to factor in the OBJECTIVE events of
the Incarnation, the Death, the Resurrection, Pentecost and the subsequent One, Holy, Catholic, and APOSTOLIC Church founded by the SUBJECT of the incarnation, of the
Death, of the Resurrection, and of Pentecost. [ Keeping in mind the theological principle:
"Where ever one of the Persons of the Trinity is, the OTHER TWO have to be." ]
Tucho, you bad, BAD boy !!
Domine non sum dignus ...