You'd simply find the best players. Clay is the only surface where you have all-time greats who are garbage on other surfaces, including some who didn't even bother to play other surfaces, while also having overall greats of the sport who never had any success on clay.
What is missing in this overview is that till an certain date clay was THE underground to play one. Hardcourt came up and therefore great players like Rafael are not high on this list. But nice to see all these oldies on the list 😊
Este vídeo deja muy claro que Manuel Orantes fue un tenista sensacional, y que hace cincuenta años se jugaban muchísimos torneos en arcilla. Luego vinieron las pistas duras, que favorecían a los norteamericanos, y la cosa cambió
@@almirCCR Fue un top ten que después de retirarse llevó una vida discreta. Bruguera es un caso parecido. Los que los vieron jugar los recuerdan como lo que fueron, dos enormes tenistas
Also, as a Romanian I am extremely proud seeing Nastase there, in the beginning of the video there was Tiriac as well, even if he was mainly a doubles player.
Tan talentoso que no le llega a Nadal ni a la suela de los zapatos. Si hubiera ganado torneos grandes, y tuviera un mayor porcentaje de partidos ganados...
@@charlesbulsara981 Vilas sólo tiene más victorias que Nadal porque jugó en una era diferente, donde los torneos en tierra batida eran aproximadamente la mitad de los torneos totales. Ahora son un 30% y gracias. Gran tenista de todas formas.
@@jmilne5751 Bro, the guy is saying that Vilas is underrated, nothing more, he doesn't compare to one of the GOATS like Rafa, just that, relax your butts
@@Disgutstado I think Vilas is Over rated... So many clay court wins for how many clay titles...ONLY 1 RG...Must of played plenty of weak players, but failed when it counted?? against good players...
@@jmilne5751Vilas set a record for the longest winning streak on clay courts in the Open Era with 53 consecutive victories in 1977. The streak was ended by Nastase with the forbidden doible strings. Of course, no player is at the level of Nadal, no sh*t Sherlock. My point is that Vilas is underrated if you look at what he achieved.
@@jmilne5751 weak players? Like beating Mc Enroe 6 times? Connors 4 times? Nastase 7 times? Borg 5 times? Orantes 7 times? What other "weak" player you want on the list? Vilas had a stellar career and defeated all top player during his time.
en la epoca de vilas la inmensa mayoria de los partidos se jugaba en clay... vilas nunca gano 10 veces el mismo torneo o 14 veces RG pd:.... y borg lo tenia de hijo !!😂
Nadal may not have had the longevity of Vilas or Orantes, but at his peak he was pretty much unbeatable by 99.99% of players on clay, especially at Roland Garros! Vilas in particular a) played a LOT more tournaments, and b) retired at age 40, but he lost more matches
so of all active players (without Nadal) the top 3 with the best win rate are: Djokovic 80,74 % Alcaraz 80,11% Tsitsipas 75,31% ok wow so Tsitsipas in the top 20 of ALL TIME. 😳 it's such a shame that he doesn't understand how badly he needs a new coach. although he claims that he has separated from his father, his father still sits somewhere in the audience at every tournament and stefanos constantly makes eye contact.
Vilas può a ben ragione essere il numero 2 o il numero 3, ci sta. Ma il numero 1 sulla terra battuta non credo sia in discussione da parte di nessuno al mondo. È l'imperatore assoluto del clay.
i got really sad. Seeing all those names from the past i was lucky to be able to watch. Some i was to young for but others i remember them well. Its like all of them are battling on that board like playing a match, trading places , back and forth then someone stands out for awhile. Then you start to see them fade. A couple that came up together , slowly fading out as they start to leave the game of Tennis and then, they are gone. Then the next group and same thing and they fade out and then, gone. Sad. I see bjorn borg, conors, Nastase , Lendl etc and they are gone. Then it was sampras, agassi etc . Now, we see two of the three trilogy step down. So sad but feel blessed i was alive to see them all. ( should have been a minimum amount of wins or plays. Someone could have barely played 10 times like in the case for alcarez not sure he should be up there since he barely had turned pro and doesn't have total numbers for clay under his belt)
hace 42 años que el máximo ganador en arcilla es Guillermo Vilas . Ganó 21% mas que el segundo Manuel Orantes. Ganó 46% mas que el tercero Rafael Nadal. Ganó 57% mas que el cuarto Tomas Muster. Ganó 66% mas que el quinto Ilie Nastase. Ganó la misma cantidad de partidos que la suma de los partidos que ganó el octavo (Carlos Moya) + los que ganó el noveno (David Ferrer). Vilas figura como el sexto mejor porcentaje de partidos ganados de 79,9%, detras de Nadal (1ro con 88,74%), detras de Borg (segundo con 85,71%), detras de Lendl (tercero con 81,03%), detras de Djokovic (cuarto con 80,74%) y detras de Alcaraz (quinto con 80,11%), Pero supera en porcentaje al tercero, al cuarto y al quinto cuando se toma el porcentaje de partidos ganados cuando tenia 483 partidos ganados (cantidad de partidos ganados en arcilla de Rafael Nadal). Cuando Vilas llego a 483 partidos ganados en arcilla, que es mucho mas de lo que ganaron Borg, Lendl, Djokovic y Alcaraz, el porcentaje de partidos ganados era de 84,8%, que es casi el de Borg (que apenas ganó 282 partidos en arcilla) y esta cerca del porcentaje de Nadal.
@@SusanaAguayoCastillo no entendí eso de "Así cualquiera", que seria lo facil?. tampoco eso de "con razón se jugaban mas partidos" estás diciendo que se jugaban mas partidos porque era en arcilla? si es eso, te cuento que eso es equivocado.
Guillermo Vilas has the most wins on clay but is not even in the top 5 players in terms of win rate. Very interesting 🙃 Wonderful job and wonderful background music 🎶
This list is misleading. Vilas won more clay court matches than Borg, but Vilas was no match for Borg. The only French title won by Vilas was 1977, when Borg did not play. The following year Vilas was helpless in his match with Borg. Until Nadal came along, Borg was considered the greatest clay courter of all time.
Unless you put the wins in the context of the losses as a percentage won, instead of total number accumulated over years and years there is no context. 1992 2nd rd loss by Lendl to unseeded Jaime Oncins at 1992 RG, becomes a success story rather than a dismal failure, if the loss is not registered statistically. The fact that you are only including ATP sanctioned events is a tremendous disadvantage to players half of who's prime years was lost before it existed. Carlson winning Kitzbulhel Austria in 1988, is treated the same as Laver winning RG in 1969 when Carlson never got past the 4th rd at the French. That's why kent Carlson has both a higher number and percentage than Rod Laver. Pay attention to the limitations as well as the strengths in the measurements.
This video is a big joke … Borg only half way there … Nadal only third …A serious work should integrate the weight of each tournament in the calculation …
You confuse stuff that's why you don't know how to read data . On left if number of wins and right się win %. Novak is nr 4 in winning % on Clay in history. He is all surfaces extraordinary. But these westerners hate that now UK or USA is the best so they are always trying to present some data where Nadal or Federer are the best. All scare to admit that some poor Serbian Christian is the best ever . They hate it
@@KarinaPOLSKA Sorry but he is NOT best ever... Court, Graf & Williams ALL have better records... You are 1 of those narrow minded idiots that WON'T accept FACT!!!!!
Match wins per surface is the most useless stat, if you need any further proof just look at this list starting with 296 wins...no Wilander, Djokovic or Kuerten, all 3-times RG winners, but you have slamless nobodies you never even heard of like Emilio Sanchez, Jose Luis Clerc or Balazs Taroczy...what a joke...
The goat of what? In his era, there were many tournaments in clay, more than nowadays. As you can see, Nadal is extremely efective, winnig 9 out 10 matches. Also, Nadal winning 14 RG.
Me da igual el número de victorias. Rafael Nadal es el mejor jugador de tierra batida de la Historia. Se le puede preguntar a Orantes, a Vilas y a cualquiera que este vivo de esa lista. Todos le dirán lo mismo. Si se hace un ránking, que sea del tenista con MAYOR NÚMERO DE VICTORIAS en tierra batida. Pero no de los mejores. Vilas no es mejor que Nadal. Orantes no es mejor que Nadal. Ni en tierra batida.
As long Jannik Sinner can use Clostebol without consequences him maybe can get on this list, but, WADA/CAS hopefully will ban him 18 month really soon.
Nadal fans in 2020: Rafa is the GOAT. He has the most majors. Nadal fans in 2023: Rafa is the Clay GOAT, and I like him better than Djerkovich. Guillermo Vilas in 2024: Hold my beer, Saudi Nadal.
Rafa è il clay goat, non c'è dubbio su questo. Vilas ha vinto più partite, ma Nadal ha vinto 14 Roland Garros, non c'è paragone anche come percentuale di partite vinte, come numero di tornei sul rosso vinti, come Roland Garros vinti. Vilas ha vinto più partite, ma Nadal ha dominato i tornei sul rosso, c'è una enorme differenza. Se parliamo solo di partite vinte, allora Connors è il GOAT assoluto, no? Ha vinto più partite di tutti se non mi sbaglio.
Borg es un gran misterio, es el eterno "y si...". Pero la realidad es que Rafa es el rey indiscutible de esta superficie y pasarán décadas, incluso siglos para que alguien se le acerque.
Grande Vilas!!!
Also love to see Thomas Muster so high up. All that success after recovering from that horrific car accident.
Enorme Guillermo con 672 partidos
You should do this for every surface, I'd be interested in seeing that.
Federer and Djokovic I believe have the most match wins ever
@@chadcat420 I'm interested in the larger statistics about the rest of the players.
You'd simply find the best players. Clay is the only surface where you have all-time greats who are garbage on other surfaces, including some who didn't even bother to play other surfaces, while also having overall greats of the sport who never had any success on clay.
@@HeavyTopspinNot sure that's true for grass especially in the last 30 years or so, but I'd be interested in the statistics any way.
@@MMerlyn91 Can't make a living on the ATP tour as a grass specialist.
Siete españoles entre los 16 primeros durante muchos años. Impresionante.
Y 5 entre los 10 primeros
NADAL is THE master of clay bar none. He is in a league of his own, an entirely new category.
but Vilas has 200 more wins than him on clay!
@@juanarambarri512 Vilas just won Roland Garros once, the most important tournament on clay.
And Rafa?
@@fotonx86 rafa many more... so it depends which stat you focus on
@@juanarambarri512 I think that's clear Rafa is the best clay tennis player ever.
What is missing in this overview is that till an certain date clay was THE underground to play one. Hardcourt came up and therefore great players like Rafael are not high on this list. But nice to see all these oldies on the list 😊
Este vídeo deja muy claro que Manuel Orantes fue un tenista sensacional, y que hace cincuenta años se jugaban muchísimos torneos en arcilla. Luego vinieron las pistas duras, que favorecían a los norteamericanos, y la cosa cambió
Lo típico, el mundo anglosajón siempre destruyendo la hispanidad
Siempre he sentido que se desmerecía lo que hizo Orantes y ya retirados Santana estaba en todas las salsas.
@@almirCCR Fue un top ten que después de retirarse llevó una vida discreta. Bruguera es un caso parecido. Los que los vieron jugar los recuerdan como lo que fueron, dos enormes tenistas
Fascinating job on this video. Thanks for sharing and taking us down memory lane.
Also, as a Romanian I am extremely proud seeing Nastase there, in the beginning of the video there was Tiriac as well, even if he was mainly a doubles player.
BJORN BORG🇸🇪 WAS MY IDOL AND STILL IS.
Un orgullo Argentino, Guillermo Vilas....
¡Grande Guillermo Vilas!, tremendamente profesional y talentoso... ❤️🇦🇷❤️
Tan talentoso que no le llega a Nadal ni a la suela de los zapatos. Si hubiera ganado torneos grandes, y tuviera un mayor porcentaje de partidos ganados...
@@SusanaAguayoCastillo no te atendió tu marido que tenes tanto odio acumulado?
@@charlesbulsara981 Vilas sólo tiene más victorias que Nadal porque jugó en una era diferente, donde los torneos en tierra batida eran aproximadamente la mitad de los torneos totales. Ahora son un 30% y gracias. Gran tenista de todas formas.
incredible Kent Rosewall, 77 % rate in the Open era, and he was 34 when open era began !!
Goat material but he's never included! The 4th of the Big4
Grande Willy!!!
Guillermo Vilas = underrated player
How many titles/slams did he win on clay compared to Nadal with some 200 less wins??
@@jmilne5751 Bro, the guy is saying that Vilas is underrated, nothing more, he doesn't compare to one of the GOATS like Rafa, just that, relax your butts
@@Disgutstado I think Vilas is Over rated... So many clay court wins for how many clay titles...ONLY 1 RG...Must of played plenty of weak players, but failed when it counted?? against good players...
@@jmilne5751Vilas set a record for the longest winning streak on clay courts in the Open Era with 53 consecutive victories in 1977. The streak was ended by Nastase with the forbidden doible strings. Of course, no player is at the level of Nadal, no sh*t Sherlock. My point is that Vilas is underrated if you look at what he achieved.
@@jmilne5751 weak players? Like beating Mc Enroe 6 times? Connors 4 times? Nastase 7 times? Borg 5 times? Orantes 7 times? What other "weak" player you want on the list? Vilas had a stellar career and defeated all top player during his time.
Thank you for this video 👍
Surprised not to see Courier and Kuerten
WaoOoW Guillermo !! 👏🏻♥️
Grande Willy Vilas!!!
Nice Video
Impresionante Vilas!!😳 No se habla tanto de él pero tiene una estadística que deja corto a Rafa, incluso con menos años en el circuito inclusive
Hombre, en esos años la mayoría de torneos eran en tierra batida pero si, era una locura de tenista
No se pueden ni comparar, pero es una leyenda de la tierra también Vilas. Vi su documental sobre como le robaron el numero 1, muy interesante.
en la epoca de vilas la inmensa mayoria de los partidos se jugaba en clay... vilas nunca gano 10 veces el mismo torneo o 14 veces RG
pd:.... y borg lo tenia de hijo !!😂
Su estadística es que pierde más partidos que Nadal. La eficacia de Nadal, ganando más del 90% de sus partidos es inigualable.
@@miguelotero4093 No, no ganó diez majors del mismo torneo, pero ganó 4 grand slam y mas de 60 torneos. Cuántos ganaste vos fantasmón?
Nadal is too good to be number 1 on the list. He was busy winning Wimbledon and US/Australian Open.
Vilas had 736 clay wins, Orantes - 574, Nastase - 451, Lendl - 367. Maybe you miss many matches of the older guys.
nadal got plus 93% ratio in the middle of his active period... just ridiculous
Era un bug del tennis sulla terra battuta.
Nadal may not have had the longevity of Vilas or Orantes, but at his peak he was pretty much unbeatable by 99.99% of players on clay, especially at Roland Garros! Vilas in particular a) played a LOT more tournaments, and b) retired at age 40, but he lost more matches
Nope. Vilas retired at 36, earlier than Nadal.
Nastase was pretty good too!
Vilas le gano a Nastase 6/0 6/0 en Montecarlo 1981
@@jorgelopez-vc7pd So? Nastase's high point was 1972-73. 1981 is irrelevant.
672 !!!! Willy always The Best !!!!!!!!!
Gran final al vídeo.
I thought Eddie Dibbs best claim to fame was the term "bagel" but he's in Top 10 all time in Single clay matches.
so of all active players (without Nadal) the top 3 with the best win rate are:
Djokovic 80,74 %
Alcaraz 80,11%
Tsitsipas 75,31%
ok wow
so Tsitsipas in the top 20 of ALL TIME. 😳
it's such a shame that he doesn't understand how badly he needs a new coach. although he claims that he has separated from his father, his father still sits somewhere in the audience at every tournament and stefanos constantly makes eye contact.
Vilas può a ben ragione essere il numero 2 o il numero 3, ci sta.
Ma il numero 1 sulla terra battuta non credo sia in discussione da parte di nessuno al mondo.
È l'imperatore assoluto del clay.
El número 2 es Borg y el número 3 seguramente sea Djokovic.
i got really sad. Seeing all those names from the past i was lucky to be able to watch. Some i was to young for but others i remember them well. Its like all of them are battling on that board like playing a match, trading places , back and forth then someone stands out for awhile. Then you start to see them fade. A couple that came up together , slowly fading out as they start to leave the game of Tennis and then, they are gone. Then the next group and same thing and they fade out and then, gone. Sad. I see bjorn borg, conors, Nastase , Lendl etc and they are gone. Then it was sampras, agassi etc . Now, we see two of the three trilogy step down. So sad but feel blessed i was alive to see them all. ( should have been a minimum amount of wins or plays. Someone could have barely played 10 times like in the case for alcarez not sure he should be up there since he barely had turned pro and doesn't have total numbers for clay under his belt)
Wow never thought Carlos Moya was so high up
90's king of clay: Muster, Early 00's KoC: Kuerten, From 05 and onwards KOC: Nadal.
Muster won the most clay court matches in the 90s but only 1 FO compared to Jim and Sergios 2.
Vilas numero 1¡¡¡
borg comfortably at the top for win rate:
*rafael nadal has entered the chat*
retired at 25 y old, you don't have " comfortably " that rate when you're 33
Ha! Say that to Roger & Novak when they was 33!
@@ErrkaPetti They are both better teniss players than Nadal😀😁😁😁
@@milanm403... Out of clay 😊
Me sorprende que Rafa no sea el num1. Grande Vilas
Eso es debido a que en los setenta se jugaban más torneos en tierra batida que ahora, donde sólo es 1/3 del circuito.
The better way to determine is to use 100+ match wins frame of reference and calculate win rate based on that...
Guillermo Vilas is goat tier in clay
Hahahaha
So Ferrero had a winning percentage peak on clay similar to Lendl :O
hace 42 años que el máximo ganador en arcilla es Guillermo Vilas . Ganó 21% mas que el segundo Manuel Orantes. Ganó 46% mas que el tercero Rafael Nadal. Ganó 57% mas que el cuarto Tomas Muster. Ganó 66% mas que el quinto Ilie Nastase. Ganó la misma cantidad de partidos que la suma de los partidos que ganó el octavo (Carlos Moya) + los que ganó el noveno (David Ferrer). Vilas figura como el sexto mejor porcentaje de partidos ganados de 79,9%, detras de Nadal (1ro con 88,74%), detras de Borg (segundo con 85,71%), detras de Lendl (tercero con 81,03%), detras de Djokovic (cuarto con 80,74%) y detras de Alcaraz (quinto con 80,11%), Pero supera en porcentaje al tercero, al cuarto y al quinto cuando se toma el porcentaje de partidos ganados cuando tenia 483 partidos ganados (cantidad de partidos ganados en arcilla de Rafael Nadal). Cuando Vilas llego a 483 partidos ganados en arcilla, que es mucho mas de lo que ganaron Borg, Lendl, Djokovic y Alcaraz, el porcentaje de partidos ganados era de 84,8%, que es casi el de Borg (que apenas ganó 282 partidos en arcilla) y esta cerca del porcentaje de Nadal.
Un animal era el Willy, tremendamente profesional y talentoso. Saludos ❤️🇦🇷❤️
¿Y qué títulos tiene? El mérito es de que la inmensa mayoría de los títulos eran en tierra, con razón se jugaban muchos más partidos. Así cualquiera.
@@SusanaAguayoCastillo Vilas gano 49 titulo en arcilla, y esta segundo detras de Nadal que ganó 59.
@@SusanaAguayoCastillo no entendí eso de "Así cualquiera", que seria lo facil?. tampoco eso de "con razón se jugaban mas partidos" estás diciendo que se jugaban mas partidos porque era en arcilla? si es eso, te cuento que eso es equivocado.
@@wzarattin Nadal ganó 63, no 59
Nadal with over 90% win rate... Insane
So proud to see Ilie Nastase so high on the top for so long!
Nastaste was in the top 5 of his era, but in all of tennis history he wasn't in the top 10 most clay court match victories
@@mima167 the video shows differently than what you are saying
kent carlsson ,the nadal of the 80,s had maybe more top spin than nadal but had to retire at 21 because of A knee injury
Very surprised I thought had more wins, I would like to see his hard court wins
Not worth mentioning! Hard court not very goos!! Grass 0!
@@milanm403 Nadal is top 5 of all time on hard
True test of endurance, patience and skill....There is ONLY 1...Nadal at over 90% win ratio, 14 Roland Garros...NEVER will be beaten....
Thank you Rafa for rest of the time.
EL MEJOR RAFAEL NADAL DISO TE BENDIGA SIEMPRE RAFA GRACIAS POR TODO TU EJEMPLO DEPORTIVO SIEMPRE RAFA NADAL
Guillermo solo encampeonatos de baja categoría..
Guillermo Vilas has the most wins on clay but is not even in the top 5 players in terms of win rate. Very interesting 🙃
Wonderful job and wonderful background music 🎶
He is 6th
@@ferchotix9 Thanks. I missed him. I'll edit the comment. 🤭
@@jonathanvelazquezph.d.2719672 wins and 169 losses according to the video...for me that might be more impressive than Ivan Lendl's 329-77😅
Perché in quel periodo veniva battuto regolarmente da Borg, ha vinto 5 partite e ne ha perse 17 contro Borg.
This list is misleading. Vilas won more clay court matches than Borg, but Vilas was no match for Borg. The only French title won by Vilas was 1977, when Borg did not play. The following year Vilas was helpless in his match with Borg. Until Nadal came along, Borg was considered the greatest clay courter of all time.
He retired too early
Djokovic and Kuerten are not even in this list
@@thebigmonstaandy6644 Yes, Djokovic is the GOAT in tenniss.
Nadal is not existing in ATP records!!!!!!
@@milanm403 Nadal is Goat on clay, Djokovic GOAT in general
do you know.why Borg didn't play in 1977?
Where's Gustavo Kuerten ??
181 wins #64, 69.88% win rate # 35
On hard & grass its federer followed by djoker but djoker has best win percent in hard & also 14 wins away from 300 on clay .
6:28 ナグル！登場！💪
Unless you put the wins in the context of the losses as a percentage won, instead of total number accumulated over years and years there is no context. 1992 2nd rd loss by Lendl to unseeded Jaime Oncins at 1992 RG, becomes a success story rather than a dismal failure, if the loss is not registered statistically. The fact that you are only including ATP sanctioned events is a tremendous disadvantage to players half of who's prime years was lost before it existed. Carlson winning Kitzbulhel Austria in 1988, is treated the same as Laver winning RG in 1969 when Carlson never got past the 4th rd at the French. That's why kent Carlson has both a higher number and percentage than Rod Laver. Pay attention to the limitations as well as the strengths in the measurements.
Incredible Nole with a 80%+ winrate in every surface.
Rafael Nadals percent rating till 2023 is constantly between 91-92%.
Because he missed many. many hard cour tournaments but NEVER clay.
Only ONE missed French Open. Man who was injured a lot never missed FO.
6:27 THE CLAY KING WAS BORN
Hey Shut TFU with that clay king. ITS tenniss. Who is ,,return'' king?
HARDCOURT KING? ATP KING?
Big Mc dont play in clay. Borg was the best ❤
5:23
RAFAEL NADAL es el indiscutible REY de la tierra batida
Nessun dubbio, se la gente ha occhi per guardare.
This video is a big joke … Borg only half way there … Nadal only third …A serious work should integrate the weight of each tournament in the calculation …
6:27 The reason you're here ;)
Strange how Nadal is top 5 on Harcourt wins, yet I don't even see Novak in top 15 here... Just shows how extraordinary Nadal truly is
You confuse stuff that's why you don't know how to read data . On left if number of wins and right się win %. Novak is nr 4 in winning % on Clay in history. He is all surfaces extraordinary. But these westerners hate that now UK or USA is the best so they are always trying to present some data where Nadal or Federer are the best. All scare to admit that some poor Serbian Christian is the best ever . They hate it
@@KarinaPOLSKA Sorry but he is NOT best ever... Court, Graf & Williams ALL have better records... You are 1 of those narrow minded idiots that WON'T accept FACT!!!!!
Boris Becker???😂😂😅😅
We're want hard and grass
Lot of spanish guys
5 españoles entre los 10 primeros ... Y alcaraz en camino...Un español es normal pero si tiene que liarla en francia se convierte en hulk😂
First.
GOATOVIĆ
Fino al 2011 non c'è traccia di Nadal......
There is no Djoković and Federer. LOL
Nole is top4 in win rate
@@SebastianSaavedra28 I saw that, but still... 🤣
Forse hai visto male, 4° all time come win rate, fenomeno anche su terra battuta.
Match wins per surface is the most useless stat, if you need any further proof just look at this list starting with 296 wins...no Wilander, Djokovic or Kuerten, all 3-times RG winners, but you have slamless nobodies you never even heard of like Emilio Sanchez, Jose Luis Clerc or Balazs Taroczy...what a joke...
Después quieren comparar a vilas con kuerten o ríos jajja. No tienen comparación!!! No le llegan a los tobillos
You should also say “thank you Guille”. In this ranking, still the goat
The goat of what? In his era, there were many tournaments in clay, more than nowadays. As you can see, Nadal is extremely efective, winnig 9 out 10 matches. Also, Nadal winning 14 RG.
Me da igual el número de victorias. Rafael Nadal es el mejor jugador de tierra batida de la Historia. Se le puede preguntar a Orantes, a Vilas y a cualquiera que este vivo de esa lista. Todos le dirán lo mismo. Si se hace un ránking, que sea del tenista con MAYOR NÚMERO DE VICTORIAS en tierra batida. Pero no de los mejores. Vilas no es mejor que Nadal. Orantes no es mejor que Nadal. Ni en tierra batida.
Obviamente Rafa es el mejor y su récord de RG va a durar mucho mucho tiempo.
Así es
Neanche nelle favole possono essere miglioro di Rafa.
Esta estadística tiene trampa y es que hace 50 años se jugaba mucho más en arcilla que ahora, donde sólo 1/3 parte del circuito es arcilla.
Alcaraz goat
Vilas fue el mejor tenista en polvo de ladrillo. Punto.
Pues no. ¿Donde están sus Roland Garros? ¿Dónde están sus Masters?
Jajajaj
So now we know Vilas and Orantes were better at clay than the overrated Nadal.
14 ROLAND GARROS...
Yes guy with 80% win rate and 1 FO is better than guy with 88% win rate and 14 FOS. You're an idiot.
@@Romans8-9 Nadal has a 90,4% win rate in reality on clay
How much time for Jannick to get there?
As long Jannik Sinner can use Clostebol without consequences him maybe can get on this list, but, WADA/CAS hopefully will ban him 18 month really soon.
@@ErrkaPetti Even using PEDs he won't do jack on clay. His game isn't suited for the surface and he won't beat Alcaraz there.
@@ErrkaPetti hopefully you get sick soon.... wait, you're already very sick, very mentally sick.
Jannik su terra battuta non ci arriverà, su cemento credo di sì.
@@MrCesko964non rispondergli, gli stupidi lasciali a loro stessi, mio consiglio spassionato.
Nadal fans in 2020: Rafa is the GOAT. He has the most majors.
Nadal fans in 2023: Rafa is the Clay GOAT, and I like him better than Djerkovich.
Guillermo Vilas in 2024: Hold my beer, Saudi Nadal.
Rafa è il clay goat, non c'è dubbio su questo.
Vilas ha vinto più partite, ma Nadal ha vinto 14 Roland Garros, non c'è paragone anche come percentuale di partite vinte, come numero di tornei sul rosso vinti, come Roland Garros vinti.
Vilas ha vinto più partite, ma Nadal ha dominato i tornei sul rosso, c'è una enorme differenza.
Se parliamo solo di partite vinte, allora Connors è il GOAT assoluto, no?
Ha vinto più partite di tutti se non mi sbaglio.
Nadal has no ATP Finals and his no. 1 record is more than just double below Djokovic!
Esto lo ha hecho un Rafa fan 😂
Las estadísticas no mienten.
Vilas 🩵🇦🇷 Inexplicable lo del 77 😢
En cuanto a tiempo de vida profesional, si vemos porcentajes, claramente, Borg.......!!!!😂
Borg es un gran misterio, es el eterno "y si...". Pero la realidad es que Rafa es el rey indiscutible de esta superficie y pasarán décadas, incluso siglos para que alguien se le acerque.