Wat ie zelf al zegt, wie ben ik om hier over te oordelen, maar denk wel dat ie een punt heeft! #stage19 #wedu @Pogacar @TadejPogacar #thepodcastwedu @wedu @LanceThunberg #howdareyou
This was a very polite kind of saying 'this guy has been doped like 10 times crazier than me but if he hadn't made this dumb mistake, may be he would have a had a chance to never be caught'.
Because he knows what it feels like to win the yellow jersey for 7 years, that’s why. He was the greatest in those years, compared with all the others wich had a bit to much pasta aswell!
In his fight to remain relevant to anyone other than his stupid adoring countrymen, Lance has this habit of repeating things twice repeating things twice.
no he isn't lol If this was Jonas winning 6 stages or this was a frenchman...nothing would be said. HTF is anyone meant to be as good as Merckx if no-one can win as much as they can? And this is all about Lance saying what he's saying under the assumption Pog is doping. Which is f***ing nuts coming from a doper that has been stripped of all his wins. Don't get me wrong...I loved that era of cycling and lance's wins. It made viewing super interesting and all those below him were as well....but the only argument he has in not winning as much as you can is that you might be suspectd of doping. Smh
@@out_spocken no Jonas or Tadej to me same problem. Being better than merckx is not the problem. The problem is that in the moderne cycling it is clearly not possible. But hey believe what you want mate. Plus Armstrong is right. His opinion is ok no matter his past.
@@ankousama5840bahaha..so don't bother trying to be as good as you can be in the modern era...just win one stage, give the rest to everyone else as long as you keep yellow at the end? What a shithouse boring race that would be. No..his opinion is f***ed. Again...he only says it because hes coming from the point that hes doping. He's been out of the game for 20 years. How GTs are raced now are not how they were. He was a c*** to other riders because they were going to speak out about doping in the pelaton ...so yeah..f*** thinking Armstrong can speak to anything moral or respectful with anything cycling. He can talk tactics about winning and about his experience...but that's it. He can fall on his sword for anything moralistic. And I LOVED lance as a cyclist. As a person, or someone thinking to lecture another rider on respect...yeah..nah. bottom of the barrel.
Tadej Pogacar is the most human person between cyclists !
@@nnbegin2965 Exactly, just like Lance!
😂😂😂😂.....yeah @@Bgdutch77
This was a very polite kind of saying 'this guy has been doped like 10 times crazier than me but if he hadn't made this dumb mistake, may be he would have a had a chance to never be caught'.
You get the point.
Sour grapes
How many races are you giving?
I don't understand this. I thought you never 'gifted' the Queen's Stage?
you dont gift any stage unless there;s a really really really REALLY good reason
Are you OK Lance???
Why they allowed this man speaking
Because he knows what it feels like to win the yellow jersey for 7 years, that’s why. He was the greatest in those years, compared with all the others wich had a bit to much pasta aswell!
😂
Doping should be just banned. Period.
It's a sport...its just unfortunate no American cycling star at the moment..
Mateo? Kristen Faulkner just won break away gold in Olympics Chloe Dygart is defending TT champ. No we have no pog or Jonas.
Baloney, if you can win and don't you dishonor your sport. It's hard to be beautiful.
lance is right, but: without the question of his biggest mistake...its a point of an unwritten cyclist rule, which depands on honor
In his fight to remain relevant to anyone other than his stupid adoring countrymen, Lance has this habit of repeating things twice repeating things twice.
Dont know why?
Dont know why?
@@Bgdutch77 🤣
"from a country like Danish"? Um. Yeah. Nah. Yeah.
Lance is perfectly right on this point.
no he isn't lol If this was Jonas winning 6 stages or this was a frenchman...nothing would be said.
HTF is anyone meant to be as good as Merckx if no-one can win as much as they can?
And this is all about Lance saying what he's saying under the assumption Pog is doping. Which is f***ing nuts coming from a doper that has been stripped of all his wins. Don't get me wrong...I loved that era of cycling and lance's wins. It made viewing super interesting and all those below him were as well....but the only argument he has in not winning as much as you can is that you might be suspectd of doping. Smh
@@out_spocken no Jonas or Tadej to me same problem.
Being better than merckx is not the problem. The problem is that in the moderne cycling it is clearly not possible. But hey believe what you want mate.
Plus Armstrong is right. His opinion is ok no matter his past.
@@ankousama5840bahaha..so don't bother trying to be as good as you can be in the modern era...just win one stage, give the rest to everyone else as long as you keep yellow at the end? What a shithouse boring race that would be.
No..his opinion is f***ed. Again...he only says it because hes coming from the point that hes doping. He's been out of the game for 20 years. How GTs are raced now are not how they were. He was a c*** to other riders because they were going to speak out about doping in the pelaton ...so yeah..f*** thinking Armstrong can speak to anything moral or respectful with anything cycling.
He can talk tactics about winning and about his experience...but that's it. He can fall on his sword for anything moralistic. And I LOVED lance as a cyclist. As a person, or someone thinking to lecture another rider on respect...yeah..nah. bottom of the barrel.