False Doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7 тис.

  • @coreyanderson1457
    @coreyanderson1457 4 роки тому +306

    If a person would just read the Bible, from beginning to end, and allow the Bible to show them what the truth is, this would show the person what they need to know. But many people go by the traditions of men, having studied the Bible very little or incompletely. So that's why it's so easy for them to believe whatever they are taught.

    • @daisystanley7103
      @daisystanley7103 3 роки тому +7

      @@charlesstuart954 in that section the bible is referring to the traditions of the Torah.

    • @michaelhanahoe9010
      @michaelhanahoe9010 3 роки тому +32

      im a catholic and Ive read my bible

    • @thomashess6211
      @thomashess6211 3 роки тому +20

      @@michaelhanahoe9010 Do you bow befor images?

    • @jonathangoodwin646
      @jonathangoodwin646 3 роки тому +24

      Very true I'm ex Catholic they go by tradition most of them don't read The Bible only what the priest told you to read in the Catholic Church day he chooses a person to read. When you show a cat foot What Jesus Christ talk about Faith Repent Accept Jesus crisis saviour What he did for us on the cross . It's by grace not good works . Do is good works in The Bible but the catholics take to add a context Well what it means by good works showing evidence you are Christian not working away to heaven . Cancel church which started 34AD. When you corner a Catholic about grace In showing the day change the 10 commandments And they have extra books of The Bible that was not expired . They blame Luther They blame Luther Death is a big excuse.

    • @usernameunknown4807
      @usernameunknown4807 3 роки тому +16

      St. Jerome says "Ignorance of the Scripture is ignorance of Christ.", he is the one who devoted his life to translate Hebrew/ Greek/ Aramaic Septuagint OT and NT mostly Koine Greek and some Aramaic, into Latin, thus producing Latin Vulgate (Latin Version), and also made some commentaries in Gospels.
      The Catholic Church existed before the 1st Gospel of Mark is ever written on 65 A.D. and the compilation of Bible (LXX from OT made of 46books and 27 books NT out of 300 books) was made official only on 367-415 . Therefore, the Church before the Bible is Compiled, is holding on Church oral Traditions, oral transmission and written apostolic letters.
      According to CCC120, It was by apostolic Tradition that the Church discerned which writing are to be included in the list of sacred books.
      Tadah! Tradition bear good fruit the Bible.
      What tradition did Jesus Christ critized? Twas some of the Mitzvot ( mitzvah for singular law), like cleansing rituals, Corban to avoid help to parents, Sabbath laws to manipulate others, sabbath feasts, Kashrut...etc , which becomes too legalistic and became burden to Jews, they forgot the heart of the oral and written Torah which is holiness, mercy and charity. Even St. Paul tells some of it in his epistle to the Colossians 2:16.
      Some Church Traditions today are often abused and goes beyond what is sound doctrine and often turned to cultic activities, heresies, schisms, worst apostate; however, the Church can easily detect it and will make apostolic letter to tell that is not the way it should be. The Church knows those abuses and she corrects it. That is only what I only know connecting Church Traditions and Bible.

  • @montanaboobie
    @montanaboobie 2 роки тому +56

    You will know them by their fruit. Jesus

    • @gregorylatta8159
      @gregorylatta8159 8 місяців тому

      False teachers are known by their fruit.

    • @savannahfan
      @savannahfan 6 місяців тому +1

      Exactly.
      Two millennia old, worldwide, all cultures and languages, 24 rites (besides Latin) in communion with each other with over 1.2 Billion followers
      Seems like it’s pretty clear which is the True Church of Christ

    • @juan_xd42
      @juan_xd42 5 місяців тому +2

      @@savannahfan Christ in His times, didn't have too much followers when He wasn't crucify yet, but when He was resurrected, He started to have a lot of followers through middle east, asia and the balkans thanks to the Apostles (later on, the whole world).
      The only True Chruch of Christ it's Him, not any earthly chruch with no authority in heaven and earth. Whoever want to understand this, understand it. I'm not here to argue, but to say the truth which it's not mine, but of Jesus Christ of Nazareth.

    • @mitchellosmer1293
      @mitchellosmer1293 2 місяці тому +1

      @@savannahfan quote---Seems like it’s pretty clear which is the True Church of Christ----unquoet
      Which church is that??? Quote it FROM the bible!!!

    • @JohnnyWalkerBlack142
      @JohnnyWalkerBlack142 24 дні тому

      @@savannahfan Ah yes, it seems you forgot the crusades, the torture of “heretics”, widespread pedophilia, the church asking for payments to escape purgatory, corrupt popes, among other things

  • @MrAlanKendall
    @MrAlanKendall Рік тому +22

    1 Timothy 2:5, "There is one mediator between God and Man - the Man Christ Jesus." Purgatory, praying to Mary, Praying to Saints, calling priests, "Father", Baptizing children, not reading the Bible, selling alcohol in church, having worldly music played at Church gatherings are all bad practices that lead people to hell.
    I was 14 and a Christian gave us a tract that you must be born again. My Mother took it home and I read it. It quoted verses from John 3:3-7. I said, "Look at these protestants, inventing false doctrines to try and get us to go to their Church. If being born again was in the Bible, the Catholic Priests would have taught us." At 16 I bought a bible and to my amazement, John 3:3-7 was in it, and then reading, I found out that being "Born Again" was the main thrust of the new Testament! But Catholics did not know about being Born Again. Orthodox Churches also do not know about being Born Again. The older the Church, the more they are steeped in Tradition and Man Made doctrines like praying to saints. 1 Timothy 2:5, "There is one mediator between God and Man - the Man Christ Jesus."

    • @bridgefin
      @bridgefin Рік тому +1

      You're both wrong on just about every count. But "selling alcohol in church" ? That's a new one!!

    • @bridgefin
      @bridgefin Рік тому

      @larysnw418
      Before I arrived there were only two of you here.

    • @bibleman8010
      @bibleman8010 Рік тому +2

      "I urge then, first of all, that requests, prayers, intercession and thanksgiving be made for everyone - for kings, for all those in authority, that we may lead a quiet and peaceful life in all godliness and holiness. This is good and pleases God our Saviour, who wants all men to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man, Christ Jesus."
      1Timothy 2:1-5
      Jesus is the one Mediator of our salvation, our only Saviour. But He is not our only intercessor, as the whole passage above clearly indicates. So the one passage that fundamentalists have used to deny intercessionary prayer, when read in context, actually backs up intercessionary prayer.
      James 5: 16-18 " ...The fervent prayer of a righteous person is very powerful. Elijah was a human being like us; yet he prayed earnestly that it might not rain, and for three years and six months it did not rain upon the land. Then he prayed again, and the sky gave rain and the earth produced its fruit."
      So we see that intercession strengthens prayer. And the more righteous and faithful the intercessor is, the more powerful the prayer.
      BUT THAT IS PRAYER ON EARTH. I'VE BEEN TOLD THAT PEOPLE IN HEAVEN CAN NEITHER SEE US OR PRAY FOR US.
      That is a recent, man-made doctrine, with no authority behind it.
      Hebrews 12.1 speaks of "a great cloud of witnesses" who surround us, and who consist of the faithful holy ones of God. Many examples of these witnesses are given in the preceding Chapter 11 of Hebrews.
      Later in the Bible we see this vision of heaven:
      Revelation 4.4: Surrounding the throne were twenty four other thrones, and seated on them were twenty four elders. They were dressed in white and had crowns of gold on their heads.
      Revelation 5.8: ...and the twenty four elders fell down before the Lamb. Each one had a harp and they were holding golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints.
      Seeking Mary's intercession probably dates back to the earliest Christians. One of the oldest Christian prayers recorded in writing, the Sub Tuum, from the 200s AD, is a prayer to Mary:
      We fly to your patronage, O holy Mother of God.
      Despise not our petitions in our necessities,
      But deliver us from all dangers,
      O ever-glorious and Blessed Virgin!
      BUT I DON'T NEED MARY WHEN I CAN GO DIRECTLY TO GOD.
      Why not say "I don't need the rest of my family as long as I have my father"? The Church is a single body; the different members interelate and rely on one another: "The eye cannot say unto the hand, "I don't need you!" And the head cannot say to the feet, "I don't need you!" (I Co 12:21).
      St. Irenaeus Against Heresies (circa 189 A.D.) :
      ..the virgin Eve, betrothed to a man but nevertheless still a virgin, was unhappily led astray,-- yet that deception was done away with because the Virgin Mary, betrothed to a man but nevertheless still a virgin, heard the truth spoken by an angel, and was obedient. For just as the former was led astray by the word of an angel, so that she fled from God when she had transgressed His word; so did the latter, by an angelic communication receive the glad tidings that she should
      sustain (portaret) God, being obedient to His word.
      The former disobeyed God, yet the latter was persuaded to be obedient to God, so that the Virgin Mary might become patroness (advocata) of the virgin Eve. And thus, as the human race fell into bondage to death by means of a virgin, so is it rescued by a virgin; virginal disobedience having been balanced in the opposite scale by virginal obedience. In the same way the sin of the first created man (protoplasti) is made amends by the correction of the First-begotten, the coming of the serpent is conquered by the harmlessness of the dove, those bonds being unloosed by which we had been fast bound to death.😆😆

    • @MrAlanKendall
      @MrAlanKendall Рік тому

      @@bibleman8010 The Catholics took the second commandment to not make any graven image of things in heaven, earth or hell and removed it from the 10 commandments. They then took the commandment to not covet your neighbors wife nor possessions and broke it up into 2 to make 10 commandments; "Thou shalt not commit Adultery" and ""Thou shalt not steal". Praying to Mary and Saints, you risk going to Hell. I Corinthians 6:9 says so. Idolatry is a sin that takes you to hell.
      I am not against Intercessory prayer, I am against fanaticism. It is the prayer of FAITH in James 5:15 that heals the sick, and it is DOUBT that prevents God from healing in Mark 5:5-6. There are different kinds of prayer in the New Testament (Matthew 18:18-20, Ephesians 6:18) and repetitive prayer is the only one that Jesus mentioned is vain, but that is the only one that 98% of believers know.
      Why not pray Ephesians 1:16-23 and Ephesians 3:14-21 instead of man-made vain prayers?
      Matthew 6:7 says not to use vain repetitions. A Catholic neighbor told me that in 71 years of being a Catholic, she had never seen a miracle.
      My Aunt said that she prayed to Mary for 60 years and where did it get her? With tears in her eyes she said 22 operations and now she does not believe in God. Crying, she said, "I had my first operation at age 21."
      My Mother prayed to the father in the name of Jesus according to John 16:23 and had zero operations. She was miraculously healed in 1977 and 2016.
      I am convinced that Praying to Mary is praying to the devil. 2 Corinthians says that Satan transforms himself like an angel of Light. Several Mexican me told me that they DO NOT believe in Jesus, that they believe in the VIrgin of Guadalupe, that SHE appeared to the Poor and that SHE loves the poor. That is fanaticism for sure.
      You must believe the Bible, not Philosophy to receive
      When Churches beg God over and over again (which does not work because in Matthew 6:7 Jesus said not to use vain repetitions), they fall back onto philosophy to explain why God does not heal. Catholic, Methodist, Lutheran, Episcopal, Nazarene, Baptist, Presbyterian, and Orthodox teach the following:
      I used to believe:
      1. God is Sovereign.
      2. God is all powerful
      3. God is in control
      4. God can do whatever he wants
      5. God has a purpose, a plan and a time for everything,
      6. God knows what you are suffering
      7. God will heal you in his time.
      This is HOPE, not FAITH. You are hoping in God 7 times. Jesus said all things were possible to him who believes, not him who hopes (Mark 9:23).
      Mark 11:24 says in the original to believe you ALREADY received. And Matthew 6:7 says the repetitions are vain. The received has an epsilon in front of it which means it is past tense. Most translations translate it to present or future, but this is a gross mistake.
      In Mark 6:5-6 Jesus WANTED to heal the blind, deaf, paralyzed but COULD'T because of their unbelief.
      James 1:6-7 says not to think that you will receive if you doubt.
      Jesus never said,
      1. Go to the doctor
      2. What did the doctor say?
      3. It is not God's will to heal you
      4. Wait
      5. God has a purpose in this sickness.
      6. God know's what you are suffering.
      7. God has a purpose and a plan and a time for everything.
      8. In His time, God will heal you.
      9. You don't have faith but I will heal you anyway.
      10. God knows what He is doing.
      11. You cannot lose your healing.
      12. God will give you faith if He wants you to be healed.
      13. God doesn't heal today.
      14. Only I and the Apostles can heal.
      15. Cannot say that sickness is of the Devil.
      16. Can't tell people they don't have faith.
      17. Your healing will be instant.
      18. God can do whatever He wants.
      19. What did the Doctor prescribe?
      20. Sickness will make you stronger.
      21. You will learn through this sickness.
      My Aunt said that she prayed to Mary for 60 years and where did it get her? With tears in her eyes she said 22 operations and now she does not believe in God. Crying, she said, "I had my first operation at age 21."
      In the Original Greek in Mark 11:24, Jesus commands His apostles to believe that they already received when they pray. In 2016, six specialists told my mother that she needed a pacemaker. She was so weak that she could only walk 20 feet in 10 minutes, and then had to sit down and rest. I shared Mark 11:24 with my mother. We prayed in the name of Jesus and then my mother praised God that she was already healed. The next day she walked a mile to go get her groceries, completely normal. She never did need a pacemaker. Just days before, she was so weak that she was hospitalized for 10 days.
      My neighbor was sent home to die because he was so low on the list for a kidney transplant. He was bedridden. The doctors told the wife that in 2 to 3 days he would be dead. We prayed the same way and he rose up completely normal the next day. He stood out in the front yard and stopped all the neighbors and told them what happened. I could go on and on for hours telling you about several neighbors and several relatives that received this way. God confirms His Word with signs (Mark 16:20), the problem is that too many are using vain repetitions which Jesus said were vain in Matthew 6:7.
      Also it is the prayer of FAITH that heals the sick in James 5:15, not just prayer. Faith is based on the Bible. Since 99% of Churches do NOT teach on healing, 99% of Churches cannot pray the prayer of Faith to receive healing.
      Look up James 5:15, it is the prayer of FAITH that heals, not the prayer of repetition.
      In Matthew 9:2, it was THEIR faith, in Matthew 9:22, it was HER faith, and in Matthew 9:29, it was THEIR faith that caused them to receive. That 3 times in only 1 chapter. In Acts 14:7-10 it was the mans faith that healed him, not Paul's faith.
      My mother sang in Church in Greek prior to coming to the US. I took 2 years of Greek at my Catholic University just so that I could prove the difference between Hoping and Believing. I even told my Greek professor and read to her Mark 11:24 in the original. She and a Greek man in Church and 2 other Greek's from work told me that I am correct in my interpretation. You must believe that you already received prior to receiving.
      You must believe the Bible, not Philosophy to receive.

    • @bridgefin
      @bridgefin Рік тому

      @@MrAlanKendall
      You: The Catholics took the second commandment to not make any graven image of things in heaven, earth or hell and removed it from the 10 commandments.
      Me: That is a lie. Are you aware that liars do not enter Heaven?
      You: Praying to Mary and Saints, you risk going to Hell. I Corinthians 6:9 says so.
      Me: It says nothing of the sort!

  • @sallyruss4574
    @sallyruss4574 Рік тому +64

    Thank you! I was raised Catholic and was taught all those things. I'm Christian now and feel free in knowing I can come to Jesus in privacy on my knees and confess my sins. I don't need to go to confession to a priest and I don't believe in perguatory anymore.

    • @colvinator1611
      @colvinator1611 11 місяців тому +10

      You're a wise lady Sally. A catholic cannot have the indwelling Holy Ghost so cannot be saved or understand the scriptures.

    • @sallyruss4574
      @sallyruss4574 11 місяців тому +10

      @@colvinator1611 Thank you for your support and kindness. It was so weird growing up and being taught about pergatory and my relatives would speak of it like it was true and you just go to this uncomfortable place for a while and get purged/purified of your sins and then you can go to heaven.

    • @adamhamilton7725
      @adamhamilton7725 11 місяців тому

      I feel very sorry for you. So confused and happy in your sins. You don’t even know enough to realize that you were always Christian,although a very poorly catechized one. The Catholic faith is the only true Christian faith. I guess you really don’t have to believe in purgatory anymore being you will probably pass right by it on your way down. Apostasy from Gods Church is a mortal sin.

    • @ninosnineveh4512
      @ninosnineveh4512 10 місяців тому +5

      They too busy denying people salvation. Our salvation is complete in Christ Jesus our Lord and anyone who tells you different is speaking lies from the devil.

    • @hamidrabiipour9707
      @hamidrabiipour9707 9 місяців тому

      So sally, do you now believe in going right straight to heaven after you die?

  • @Sola_Scriptura_1.618
    @Sola_Scriptura_1.618 Рік тому +6

    Anyone who doubts the false doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church and read Exodus 20 and compare God's Commandments to the RCC and their Christian Catechism. The Second Commandment was eliminated! This made me turn to the Bible and follow the word of God directly. I do not need an institution created by men to lead me to the gates of hell.

    • @Catholic101A.
      @Catholic101A. Рік тому +2

      I believe in one God almighty creator of heaven and earth…. The beginning of the nicene creed we profess every time in Mass, so that includes having no other gods no matter what many think. Jesus said if you love me keep my commandments (my) Jesus commandments John 14:15..Jesus commandments Matthew 5:17-7:28-1John 2:3-9 compare to exodus and Deuteronomy old Law, Jesus made a new covenant…

    • @forgiven2812
      @forgiven2812 4 дні тому

      @@Catholic101A.
      Indeed, He also created a third distinct group:
      Gentile
      Jew
      Church.

  • @lenpresley8492
    @lenpresley8492 2 роки тому +64

    Ex catholic , born again believer in the death burial and resurrection of my lord and saviour Jesus the Christ. I have witnessed to my whole family , and watched them come to faith in Jesus one by one . Praise God. I love Jesus, I want to thank him on my knees before him. He loves me ,He loves you, more than you can ever comprehend. Come Lord Jesus, come quickly, thy will be done.....

    • @margaretlobo9466
      @margaretlobo9466 2 роки тому +3

      Of all the religions, God has favoured Catholic Christianity, more than all others, with His presence and manifestations in the past 2,000 years.
      Catholics have been favoured with Eucharistic Miracles- like the 1996 Eucharistic Miracle of Buenos Aires, Argentina & in Lanciano, Italy in the 8th C
      In Acts 2:27 - we read - For God will not allow His Holy one to undergo corruption. Likewise, God has clothed with incorruptibility the corpses of Catholic saints who have led a holy life in conformity with Jesus. The 500 year incorrupt corpse of St. Francis Xavier, which resides in Goa, India, is one example.
      Fr. Albert Hebert has compiled a list of over 400 resurrections of people who died but were raised to life by many Catholic saints. His book - Raised from the Dead - is available in book-stores.
      Jesus, our Living God, has appeared to many saints. In the 14th C, Jesus appeared to St. Bridget of Sweden who was much desirous of knowing about his agony He endured on the Way to Calvary - in other words, His Passion & Death. For a whole year Jesus taught her 15 Prayers and attached Promises to anyone who repeats these Prayers continuously for a year - the 1st Promise being - Jesus will deliver 15 souls of his/her lineage from Purgatory. ( Note - you can check the Internet under - The 15 Prayers of St. Bridget - and also view the Promises. ) And in the 1930's, not yet a hundred years ago, Jesus appeared to a Polish Nun, Sr. Faustina, and taught her the following prayer - Eternal Father, I offer you the Body & Blood, Soul & Divinity of your dearly Beloved Son, our Lord Jesus Christ. In atonement for our sins and those of the whole world. For the sake of His sorrowful Passion, have mercy on us and the whole world. - This is in line with The Lord's Prayer which is pluralistic with the words - Our, Us, We, etc.
      And in 1995, Jesus appeared to a Nigerian named Barnabas and gave him the Devotion to His Precious Blood
      - ( continued )

    • @margaretlobo9466
      @margaretlobo9466 2 роки тому +2

      Protestantism is not so much a Religion as a Religious Philosophy. It is a belief in Christ, to be sure, but then it remains a hearer and not doer of The Word, thus deceiving themselves - James 1:22. There is no substance or forms of worship and thanksgiving to Jesus God and Saviour for His work of Creation and Redemption. Catholics, on the other hand, believe in the Real - John 6:53-58 - Presence of Jesus in Holy Communion -Eucharist which is the Greek word for Thanksgiving. The Mass is truly both a form of Worship and Thanksgiving. Other forms include Eucharistic Adorations, Benedictions, Eucharistic Processions, etc.
      Protestantism does not take account that the same Jesus issued Commandments - not suggestions - for which there are penalties for non-compliance. It ignores that God - tests - each and every person with consequences in not fulfilling these tests or running away like Jonah It bypasses that humans are still under the influence of our Fallen Natures whereby we sin - even mortally - 1John 5:16-17 - and do works of the flesh that would disqualify us from Heaven - Galatians 5:19-21. On the way to Calvary, Jesus cautioned the women of Jerusalem - Luke 23:28-31 - to weep for themselves and their children for forthcoming days of great sorrow. As God, Jesus foreknew the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 AD, which was not only the result of the Jews not acknowledging the time of the Visitation of their Messiah, Jesus, but also because of their sins, especially of their hypocritical leaders - the Scribes, Chief Priests and Pharisees Thus for Protestants to believe that - all - sins are eternally forgiven and covered by the precious Blood of Jesus is false. Other examples that God still hates sin was the "execution" of Ananias and Sapphira for dishonesty and lying- Acts 5. And Jesus' threatened spewing out and vomiting of the lukewarm Laodicean church - Rev 3
      John 21:25 states that Jesus did many other things which the written word is incapable of recording. As a result 2 traditions ensued - oral and written - 2 Thess. 2:15 - which are of equal merit. By "Sola Scriptura" Protestants are only receiving part of Divine Truth thus resulting in so many denominations. The Catholic Church was founded on Peter's rock-solid declaration of Jesus' Divinity - Matt. 16:16 and Jesus' promise - Matt 16:17-19- and holds to both traditions. It is the Church of the Living God and the Pillar and Bulwark of Truth - 1 Timothy 3:15
      Many Catholic churches have side chapels, some even open 24/7, whereby the Holy Eucharist is exposed for veneration/worship. They are open to the public - even non-Catholics. I really hope that you will make use of these to worship and adore our Living God. God IS Living and has manifested His Presence through many Eucharistic Miracles - check the Internet for details of the 1996 miracle in Buenos Aires and the 8th Century one in Lanciano, Italy.

    • @andrewrolwes6034
      @andrewrolwes6034 2 роки тому +3

      @@margaretlobo9466
      Beautiful post Margaret. May God bless and Our Lady keep you in Her prayers.

    • @margaretlobo9466
      @margaretlobo9466 2 роки тому +2

      @@andrewrolwes6034 Thanks and God bless

    • @lenpresley8492
      @lenpresley8492 2 роки тому +6

      @@margaretlobo9466 i will pray for you. By grace are you saved thru faith, not of works. Read your bible....read the letters paul wrote to the gentiles, that would be me and you i assume. All the other apostles went to the jews. Slightly different gospel , the gospel of grace not works is what paul preached. The gospel of the kingdom is what the other apostles preached to the jews. Gospel of the kingdom plus judaism is what the catholic church is all about. Works alone ,if you do enough might get you to heaven. What a concept... paul is your apostle if you are a gentile, (anyone but a jew), than you should read all pauls letters, then tell me you dont believe in salvation by grace thru-faith alone not of works,,, it is childlike faith, JESUS made it so easy for us to believe .....

  • @MW-eg4gu
    @MW-eg4gu 7 місяців тому +16

    I was a Catholic but then I read my Bible, and I realized I had to leave the Catholic Church, and I had to join the Pentecostal Church ... the Baptist Church ... the Seventh-Day Adventists ... the Methodists ... the Church of Christ ... the ... Question - If I, a Catholic, leave the Catholic Church, which church should I join, and why?

    • @SusanBurrows-y9t
      @SusanBurrows-y9t 5 місяців тому +9

      The " church" you should join is JESUS' CHURCH. In the Bible church is the group of believers who follow & submit to Jesus as Lord, and as HE taught & approved in God's Word THE BIBLE. Look for a group of people who focus on God's Word every week & put Jesus'2 commandments ( LOVE THE LORD & YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF). Nothing else is mandatory, just God and His Word. (80% of Catholic teachings are outside the Bible & manmade, & 80% of Catholic salvation is human works & unbiblical beliefs). Choose manmade apostasy or TRUTH.

    • @cafebrown771
      @cafebrown771 5 місяців тому +4

      I suggest you follow Christ, the early church met in homes and different people led the sermons.

    • @cafebrown771
      @cafebrown771 5 місяців тому +2

      They would read the scriptures then discuss them.

    • @juan_xd42
      @juan_xd42 5 місяців тому +3

      Come to the Lord my brother, and help us to spread the Gospel Christ, that's what i belong, thats where you belong, there is all believers belong; the Chruch of Christ which it's not in earth, but in the Lord.
      God bless you my brother💟

    • @robertlulek1634
      @robertlulek1634 5 місяців тому +4

      For the person that said which church you should leave, you should leave for a nondenominational church. Where did all these denominations come from? Anyway Jesus was not a denomination. He was a Christian or he was the head leader as what a Christian should be rather I should say. So anyone who follows the life of Jesus is a Christian is a simple gospel that we are saved by grace and Grace alone. God is three distinct personalities God, if we believe in the intangibles and the certain of the gospel, we are saved. Human beings have desire to want to create a religion, which is their way to finding God rather than the God that is, which is truth.

  • @jonathangoodwin646
    @jonathangoodwin646 3 роки тому +68

    We only worship one gun The word Pope means holy father . We only have one father that's our father in heaven not the Pope.

    • @regeneratedservantph4994
      @regeneratedservantph4994 3 роки тому +22

      One of the blasphemy of catholic church...to call priest as father..and vicar of Christ..its in revelation referring to a harlot..

    • @bridgefin
      @bridgefin 3 роки тому +1

      @@regeneratedservantph4994
      You don't understand the Scriptures.

    • @NicklasNylander87
      @NicklasNylander87 3 роки тому +1

      it actually just means "father"

    • @catholicdoctrine
      @catholicdoctrine 3 роки тому

      @@regeneratedservantph4994 What did Lord Jesus Christ call St. Joseph and the Blessed Virgin Mary?

    • @thomashess6211
      @thomashess6211 3 роки тому

      @@catholicdoctrine Jesus called Mary Oh Great virgin Queen of Heaven. Jesus spoke of little else.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +7

    ​ @Connor Mickelson *WHy dont you compare what is in R Church's decor with what the Bible says? Is that really still decor?*
    Carved image = statues!
    Deu 4:16 lest you act corruptly and make for yourselves a carved image in the form of any figure: the likeness of male or female,
    Exo 20:4 "You shall not make for yourself a carved image-any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth;
    Exo 23:24 You shall not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do according to their works; but you shall utterly overthrow them and completely break down their sacred pillars.
    Lev 26:1 'You shall not make idols for yourselves; neither a carved image nor a sacred pillar shall you rear up for yourselves; nor shall you set up an engraved stone in your land, to bow down to it; for I am the LORD your God.
    Deu 4:23 Take heed to yourselves, lest you forget the covenant of the LORD your God which He made with you, and make for yourselves a carved image in the form of anything which the LORD your God has forbidden you.
    Deu 4:25 "When you beget children and grandchildren and have grown old in the land, and act corruptly and make a carved image in the form of anything, and do evil in the sight of the LORD your God to provoke Him to anger,
    Deu 5:8 'You shall not make for yourself a carved image-any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth;
    Deu 27:15 'Cursed is the one who makes a carved or molded image, an abomination to the LORD, the work of the hands of the craftsman, and sets it up in secret.' "And all the people shall answer and say, 'Amen!'
    Hebrew word for worship:
    shâchâh
    shaw-khaw'
    A primitive root; to depress, that is, prostrate (especially reflexively in homage to royalty or God): - bow (self) down, crouch, fall down (flat), humbly beseech, do (make) obeisance, do reverence, make to stoop, worship.
    Greek word for worship:
    προσκυνέω
    proskuneō
    pros-koo-neh'-o
    From G4314 and probably a derivative of G2965 (meaning to kiss, like a dog licking his master’s hand); to fawn or crouch to, that is, (literally or figuratively) prostrate oneself in homage (do reverence to, adore): - worship.
    you said
    We do not worship the statues they are only used as a decoration in our churches

  • @solafide9533
    @solafide9533 2 роки тому +5

    ​ @The Mysterious Cynthia X *You see? You cannot refute this too. Your lack of knowledge is evident.*
    *Jesus, Apostles and disciples all turned to the Scriptures when they taught. They did not rely on traditions of Moses or Pharisees for doctrines. They quoted Written Word / Scriptures around 150 times in NT. So Sola Scriptura is true!*
    Mat 2:5 So they said to him, "In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet:
    Mat 4:4 But He answered and said, "It is written, 'MAN SHALL NOT LIVE BY BREAD ALONE, BUT BY EVERY WORD THAT PROCEEDS FROM THE MOUTH OF GOD.' "
    Mat 4:6 and said to Him, "If You are the Son of God, throw Yourself down. For it is written: 'HE SHALL GIVE HIS ANGELS CHARGE OVER YOU,' and, IN THEIR HANDS THEY SHALL BEAR YOU UP, LEST YOU DASH YOUR FOOT AGAINST A STONE.' "
    Mat 4:7 Jesus said to him, "It is written again, 'YOU SHALL NOT TEMPT THE LORD YOUR GOD.' "
    Mat 4:10 Then Jesus said to him, "Away with you, Satan! For it is written, 'YOU SHALL WORSHIP THE LORD YOUR GOD, AND HIM ONLY YOU SHALL SERVE.' "
    Mat 11:10 For this is he of whom it is written: 'BEHOLD, I SEND MY MESSENGER BEFORE YOUR FACE, WHO WILL PREPARE YOUR WAY BEFORE YOU.'
    Mat 21:13 And He said to them, "It is written, 'MY HOUSE SHALL BE CALLED A HOUSE OF PRAYER,' but you have made it a 'DEN OF THIEVES.'"
    Mat 26:24 The Son of Man indeed goes just as it is written of Him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been good for that man if he had not been born."
    *Even nt Church of the Bible (Apostles and elders) appealed to the Word of God for determination of doctrines in Acts 15. The council did not decide based on their own words; neither on traditions of Pharisees or Moses. They based their decisions on "WHAT GOD SAID". Yes they met at Jerusalem council Acts 15 to discuss. But they appeal to what God says. Using God's word to decide what to do!*
    *Bible says decision was made by Apostles and elders. Not single leader Peter!! (let alone pope). Acts 15:6, 16:4.*
    Act 15:6 Now the apostles and elders came together to consider this matter.
    Act 16:4 And as they went through the cities, they delivered to them the decrees to keep, which were determined by the apostles and elders at Jerusalem.
    *1. Peter appealed using what God told him:*
    to him rgd his vision of the clean and unclean animals in Acts 10..
    That gentiles are accepted.
    Act 10:13 And a voice came to him, "Rise, Peter; kill and eat."
    Act 10:14 But Peter said, "Not so, Lord! For I have never eaten anything common or unclean."
    Act 10:15 And a voice spoke to him again the second time, "What God has cleansed you must not call common."
    Act 15:7 And when there had been much dispute, Peter rose up and said to them: "Men and brethren, you know that a good while ago God chose among us, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe.
    *2. James appealed using the Word of God:*
    Act 15:13 And after they had become silent, James answered, saying, "Men and brethren, listen to me:
    Act 15:14 Simon has declared how God at the first visited the Gentiles to take out of them a people for His name.
    Act 15:15 And with this the words of the prophets agree, just as it is written:
    Act 15:16 'AFTER THIS I WILL RETURN AND WILL REBUILD THE TABERNACLE OF DAVID, WHICH HAS FALLEN DOWN; I WILL REBUILD ITS RUINS, AND I WILL SET IT UP;
    Act 15:17 SO THAT THE REST OF MANKIND MAY SEEK THE LORD, EVEN ALL THE GENTILES WHO ARE CALLED BY MY NAME, SAYS THE LORD WHO DOES ALL THESE THINGS.'
    Act 15:18 "Known to God from eternity are all His works.
    Act 15:19 Therefore I judge that we should not trouble those from among the Gentiles who are turning to God,
    *3. Apostles Barnabas and Paul appealed to the “works of GOD done on the Gentiles”.*
    Act 15:12 Then all the multitude kept silent and listened to Barnabas and Paul declaring how many miracles and wonders God had worked through them among the Gentiles.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +3

    ​ @Turin21 *You claimed there is no Scripture alone in the Bible? Really?*
    *Jesus and apostles all appealed to Scriptures only as support for doctrines. They did that 150 times in nt alone. They did not appeal to traditions of Pharisees and Moses as doctrines. NT church of the Bible also appealed to “what God says” and “what God said” as support for doctrines at Jerusalem Council. Acts 15. Not traditions. Isn’t that good enough proof Christians should only take doctrines from Scriptures only?*
    Mat 2:5 So they said to him, "In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet:
    Mat 4:4 But He answered and said, "It is written, 'MAN SHALL NOT LIVE BY BREAD ALONE, BUT BY EVERY WORD THAT PROCEEDS FROM THE MOUTH OF GOD.' "
    Mat 4:6 and said to Him, "If You are the Son of God, throw Yourself down. For it is written: 'HE SHALL GIVE HIS ANGELS CHARGE OVER YOU,' and, IN THEIR HANDS THEY SHALL BEAR YOU UP, LEST YOU DASH YOUR FOOT AGAINST A STONE.' "
    Mat 4:7 Jesus said to him, "It is written again, 'YOU SHALL NOT TEMPT THE LORD YOUR GOD.' "
    Mat 4:10 Then Jesus said to him, "Away with you, Satan! For it is written, 'YOU SHALL WORSHIP THE LORD YOUR GOD, AND HIM ONLY YOU SHALL SERVE.' "
    Mat 11:10 For this is he of whom it is written: 'BEHOLD, I SEND MY MESSENGER BEFORE YOUR FACE, WHO WILL PREPARE YOUR WAY BEFORE YOU.'
    Mat 21:13 And He said to them, "It is written, 'MY HOUSE SHALL BE CALLED A HOUSE OF PRAYER,' but you have made it a 'DEN OF THIEVES.'"
    Mat 26:24 The Son of Man indeed goes just as it is written of Him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been good for that man if he had not been born."
    Mat 26:31 Then Jesus said to them, "All of you will be made to stumble because of Me this night, for it is written: 'I WILL STRIKE THE SHEPHERD, AND THE SHEEP OF THE FLOCK WILL BE SCATTERED.'
    *Even nt Church of the Bible (Apostles and elders) appealed to the Word of God for determination of doctrines in Acts 15. The council did not decide based on their own words; neither on traditions of Pharisees or Moses. They based their decisions on "WHAT GOD SAID". Yes they met at Jerusalem council Acts 15 to discuss. But they appeal to what God says. Using God's word to decide what to do!*
    *Bible says decision was made by Apostles and elders. Not single leader Peter!! (let alone pope). Acts 15:6, 16:4.*
    Act 15:6 Now the apostles and elders came together to consider this matter.
    Act 16:4 And as they went through the cities, they delivered to them the decrees to keep, which were determined by the apostles and elders at Jerusalem.
    *1. Peter appealed using what God told him:*
    to him rgd his vision of the clean and unclean animals in Acts 10..
    That gentiles are accepted.
    Act 10:13 And a voice came to him, "Rise, Peter; kill and eat."
    Act 10:14 But Peter said, "Not so, Lord! For I have never eaten anything common or unclean."
    Act 10:15 And a voice spoke to him again the second time, "What God has cleansed you must not call common."
    Act 15:7 And when there had been much dispute, Peter rose up and said to them: "Men and brethren, you know that a good while ago God chose among us, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe.
    *2. James appealed using the Word of God:*
    Act 15:13 And after they had become silent, James answered, saying, "Men and brethren, listen to me:
    Act 15:14 Simon has declared how God at the first visited the Gentiles to take out of them a people for His name.
    Act 15:15 And with this the words of the prophets agree, just as it is written:
    Act 15:16 'AFTER THIS I WILL RETURN AND WILL REBUILD THE TABERNACLE OF DAVID, WHICH HAS FALLEN DOWN; I WILL REBUILD ITS RUINS, AND I WILL SET IT UP;
    Act 15:17 SO THAT THE REST OF MANKIND MAY SEEK THE LORD, EVEN ALL THE GENTILES WHO ARE CALLED BY MY NAME, SAYS THE LORD WHO DOES ALL THESE THINGS.'
    Act 15:18 "Known to God from eternity are all His works.
    Act 15:19 Therefore I judge that we should not trouble those from among the Gentiles who are turning to God,
    *3. Apostles Barnabas and Paul appealed to the “works of GOD done on the Gentiles”.*
    Act 15:12 Then all the multitude kept silent and listened to Barnabas and Paul declaring how many miracles and wonders God had worked through them among the Gentiles.

  • @jt06061
    @jt06061 Місяць тому +3

    Ephesians 2:19-22
    This verse describes the Church as built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus as the cornerstone.
    Acts 1:21-26
    After Jesus' Ascension, the apostles chose Matthias to replace Judas, who had committed suicide. They laid hands on Matthias to give him apostolic authority
    1 Timothy 1:6 and 4:14
    Paul tells Timothy that he was given the office of bishop through the laying on of hands
    John 20:21
    This verse uses the Greek word apostello, which means "one sent with the authority of the one who sent him
    There are plenty of verses this guy clearly shouldn’t be teaching he has no authority

  • @jackydebosard8297
    @jackydebosard8297 2 роки тому +30

    Awesome!👌 thank you for sharing. " You will know the truth and the truth will set you free..." ( John 8:32).
    In his Revelation the Apostle John wrote; " And I saw the woman dressed in purple and scarlet, she was sitting on the beast, holding a golden cup, drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus. On her forehead were written blaspheme words..." ( Revelation 17:6). Also, the Apostle Paul wrote; " But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God's curse..." (Galatians 1:8); ( 2 Corinthians 1:8). Let's give All the Glory to God and praise our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen 🙏

    • @miketeixeira7853
      @miketeixeira7853 2 роки тому +2

      So.....let us look at the first martyr in Acts 7: 55-56. Who has his blood on their hands ???

    • @jackydebosard8297
      @jackydebosard8297 2 роки тому +6

      Stephen, a deacon in Jerusalem, was the first saint in Christ Jesus, who was martyred, condemned and stoned to death by religious Jewish ✡ pharisees, saducees and scribes...( Acts of the Apostle 7:8). Also, we should add the inquisitions which claimed the life of 50 million peoples and believers in Christ under Pope Innocent III ( 1198-1216), then under Pope Gregory IX (1233). Also to add to the blood of the saints the so called " Crusades " which claimed the life of at least two to six million peoples, under Pope Urban II, on November 27, 1095.

    • @miketeixeira7853
      @miketeixeira7853 2 роки тому

      @@jackydebosard8297.............I have no proof of ' millions ' of deaths during the inquisitions or crusades but, there are the millions of abortions that continue even to today, with only the Catholic Church screaming for its end.

    • @jackydebosard8297
      @jackydebosard8297 2 роки тому +7

      To mike teixeira. Hi mike, let's talk about serious spiritual issues and blasphemes.
      DO NOT WORSHIP THE IDOL
      Mary was highly favored by God and chosen as a human vessel for the fulfillment of God plan of Salvation for All. The virgin Mary was never intended as a human, to become a mediator between humans and God. ( Leviticus 26:1); ( Exodus 20:2-6); ( John 4:24).
      " There is only One God and One Mediator who can reconcile God the Father and humanity - the man Christ Jesus..." ( 1 Timothy 2:5); ( Luke 1:26-38); (Romans 8:26-27); ( Exodus 20:4-5); ( Matthew 12:46-50).
      Jesus replied; " The Scripture say, you must worship the Lord your God and serve only him..." (Luke 4:8); ( Luke 1:46-56); ( Luke 11:27-28).
      Also, please read
      Psalm 51:5 + Psalm 148:13 + Acts 4:12 +

    • @miketeixeira7853
      @miketeixeira7853 2 роки тому +4

      @@jackydebosard8297......Au contraire !!! Mary is a proven intercessor..........see John 2: 1-11. She was told that Her Holy Son would inherit the throne of David in Luke 1: 32. In the Davidic reign, it was the mother who interceded for the people........see 1 Kings 2: 16-19. This is different than 1 Tim. 2: 5.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +7

    ​ @Michael *Where in the Bible teaches allthesensofRCt: "faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved?" Pls answer. Stop dodging Mike Teixeira.*

    • @terryqueenjr.6700
      @terryqueenjr.6700 4 місяці тому +3

      It doesn’t say that anywhere in any Bible, Catholic system is false

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@terryqueenjr.6700 *Of course it does. Implicitly. If Roman religion is really the Church of the Bible or the "one true church". Then why are 95% of RC doctrines and RC clergies not in the Bible? Mind boggling ... Lol*
      *nt Church of the Bible did not have Roman pontiff neither Roman priests, neither did Apostles pray to dead saints or Mary, neither did Apostles and Jesus make statues for Mary and saint .. Neither bow down to statues .. Neither Roman unholy water, neither sinless Mary, neither veneration of skulls bones tongues ... So where are all these man made doctrines of Rome in the Bible? Neither all the below man made doctrines! Wonder where they come from?*
      *There was never a Catholic Church in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Catholic Church in the Bible.*
      *There was never a Catholic in the Bible.*
      *There was never a Roman Catholic in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church pope in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church priest in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church cardinal in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church sinless Mary in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church unholy water in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church penance in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church purgatory in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church canonised saint in the Bible.*
      *There was never an Nt believer who made or bow down to statues in the Bible.*
      *There was never an Nt believer who prays or received prayers from passed saints or Mary in the Bible.*
      *There was never an ecumenical council with bishops of all churches that decided the canon in history*
      *If you can find one example in the New Testament I will give you a lollipop.*
      *nt church of the Apostles did not have such practices. Answer me: did apostles make and bow down to statues? Did Apostles ask passed on saints to pray for them? Or sprinkle "holy" water on believers? Or wore fishhead hat and costumes? Or cite hocus pocus when they serve the communion? They merely broke bread and passed around the table. Did they demand believers to kneel in front of them to serve them communion? Or did Peter ask believers to kiss his hands and feet? Or did Apostles venerate statues, bones or relics?*
      *You do see clearly it all came from practices of believers after the Apostles - which Rcs claimed its from early writings. They had already deviated from the Apostles and Jesus. What Rcc called doctrines were merely partly traditions of errant believers + partly its own self traditions. Totally not from Jesus and Apostles at all.*
      you said
      It doesn’t say that anywhere in any Bible, Catholic system is false

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@terryqueenjr.6700 *Of course it does. If Roman Catholicism is truth or Church of the Bible, why was there not a single New Covenant believer saved in a Roman Catholic way in the whole Bible? Why is that so? Please explain coherently intelligently.*
      - submit to Roman pope to be saved
      - devote to Roman Mary to be saved
      - be in Roman Church to be saved
      - partake Roman sacraments to be saved
      - baptise in Roman baptism to be saved

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 4 місяці тому +3

      ​ @terryqueenjr.6700 *Of course it does. Implicitly. If Roman religion is really the Church of the Bible or the "one true church". Then why are 95% of RC doctrines and RC clergies not in the Bible? Mind boggling ... Lol*
      *nt Church of the Bible did not have Roman pontiff neither Roman priests, neither did Apostles pray to dead saints or Mary, neither did Apostles and Jesus make statues for Mary and saint .. Neither bow down to statues .. Neither Roman unholy water, neither sinless Mary, neither veneration of skulls bones tongues ... So where are all these man made doctrines of Rome in the Bible? Neither all the below man made doctrines! Wonder where they come from?*
      *There was never a Catholic Church in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Catholic Church in the Bible.*
      *There was never a Catholic in the Bible.*
      *There was never a Roman Catholic in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church pope in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church priest in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church cardinal in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church sinless Mary in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church unholy water in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church penance in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church purgatory in the Bible.*
      *There was never a R Church canonised saint in the Bible.*
      *There was never an Nt believer who made or bow down to statues in the Bible.*
      *There was never an Nt believer who prays or received prayers from passed saints or Mary in the Bible.*
      *There was never an ecumenical council with bishops of all churches that decided the canon in history*
      *If you can find one example in the New Testament I will give you a lollipop.*
      *nt church of the Apostles did not have such practices. Answer me: did apostles make and bow down to statues? Did Apostles ask passed on saints to pray for them? Or sprinkle "holy" water on believers? Or wore fishhead hat and costumes? Or cite hocus pocus when they serve the communion? They merely broke bread and passed around the table. Did they demand believers to kneel in front of them to serve them communion? Or did Peter ask believers to kiss his hands and feet? Or did Apostles venerate statues, bones or relics?*
      *You do see clearly it all came from practices of believers after the Apostles - which Rcs claimed its from early writings. They had already deviated from the Apostles and Jesus. What Rcc called doctrines were merely partly traditions of errant believers + partly its own self traditions. Totally not from Jesus and Apostles at all.*
      you said
      It doesn’t say that anywhere in any Bible, Catholic system is false

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 4 місяці тому +1

      ​ @terryqueenjr.6700 *Of course it does. If Roman Catholicism is truth or Church of the Bible, why was there not a single New Covenant believer saved in a Roman Catholic way in the whole Bible? Why is that so? Please explain coherently intelligently.*
      - submit to Roman pope to be saved
      - devote to Roman Mary to be saved
      - be in Roman Church to be saved
      - partake Roman sacraments to be saved
      - baptise in Roman baptism to be saved

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +7

    ​ @Daniel Hunt *Again tales. Where in the Bible says Jesus instituted a new clergy priesthood in NT? WHere? Chap verse?*
    you said
    Now, Jesus instituted His New Covenant priesthood for this purpose on earth.

  • @EdwardGraveline
    @EdwardGraveline 10 місяців тому +1

    Jesus started just one church. Matthew 16 says, “Upon this rock (He told Simon-Peter whose name He changed) I will build MY CHURCH. Just one. Ephesians 4 says, “There is one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all.” John 17, Jesus prayed “that we would all be one, as You and I are One.” When Martin Luther died in 1546, there were over 100 Christian churches all teaching different doctrines. How many different doctrines do Protestants and Evangelicals have? 10? 20? Once saved, always saved? Many Christian churches teach this, but many say no. Faith alone saved you? Again, many say yes, but many say no. Matthew 5:18 says For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. That is why there is no such thing as more important doctrines and less important ones. The Church, St Paul says in 1 Tim 3:15, “is the pillar and foundation of truth,” Not the Bible. We know it is the Catholic Church because John the Apostle went to Antioch, converted a man named Ignatius, and made him Bishop. Ignatius got captured and sent to Rome to be eaten by lions. On the trip, he wrote to the Smyrneans, “Where the Bishop is, there is Jesus Christ, and there is the Catholic Church. 110AD

    • @shanequa555
      @shanequa555 10 місяців тому

      Peter never even went to Rome. Google it!

    • @johnjones3579
      @johnjones3579 6 днів тому

      @@EdwardGraveline Thank You! Most Protestants are pretty much uneducated hillbillies, snake handlers etc. They should bless & thank the Catholic Church for preserving scripture, art, medicine, education, philosophy, etc. Protestants add zero to the world except ignorance & hatred. Pray for them.

  • @coastaldiva
    @coastaldiva 11 місяців тому +4

    Im sorry but you spent 55 minutes not proving anything. The Catholic traditions that you dont appear to like are based on the traditions that the Apostles (the leaders of the first church ever) brought about inspired by the Holy Spirit. You’re so off course…

    • @coastaldiva
      @coastaldiva 11 місяців тому +1

      Also Catholics are not told to only read the Catholic translation of the bible. That is blatantly incorrect.

  • @manorama12
    @manorama12 2 роки тому +7

    One question - How did you get the Bible?????

    • @jesusfaith2232
      @jesusfaith2232 2 роки тому +6

      From God!

    • @godfridahkatentemuna3277
      @godfridahkatentemuna3277 Рік тому +4

      ​@@jesusfaith2232 It was compiled by the Catholic Church.

    • @stevostevozz1168
      @stevostevozz1168 Рік тому

      and then not followed by the catholic church,,,@@godfridahkatentemuna3277 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @bensamadams
      @bensamadams 9 місяців тому +1

      Please read the bible my friend and the history of the Catholic Church bible came from God

    • @Bathoggywinger
      @Bathoggywinger 9 місяців тому +1

      @@godfridahkatentemuna3277 A gnostic heretic named Marcion made the first compilation that we know today as the Bible. The Catholic church only bothered with it after the fact.

  • @browncony3897
    @browncony3897 Рік тому +4

    ​ @menofvirtue6238 *Where in the Bible teaches worshipping/venerating skulls bones tongue blood hair and every grotesque things like R Catholics? Chap verse?*
    *Do you think you can enter kingdom of heaven by r ct m m doctrines?*

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +2

    ​ @Michael *Bible does not say its atonement. Jesus merely asked Z to make restitution. Not atonement for sins. No man can atone for sins except Jesus.*
    *Z did not get Salvation because of restitution. He got salvation because he truly believed in Jesus.*
    Exo 22:3 If the sun has risen on him, there shall be guilt for his bloodshed. He should make full restitution; if he has nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft.
    Exo 22:5 "If a man causes a field or vineyard to be grazed, and lets loose his animal, and it feeds in another man's field, he shall make restitution from the best of his own field and the best of his own vineyard.
    Exo 22:6 "If fire breaks out and catches in thorns, so that stacked grain, standing grain, or the field is consumed, he who kindled the fire shall surely make restitution.
    Exo 22:12 But if, in fact, it is stolen from him, he shall make restitution to the owner of it.
    Lev 5:16 And he shall make restitution for the harm that he has done in regard to the holy thing, and shall add one-fifth to it and give it to the priest. So the priest shall make atonement for him with the ram of the trespass offering, and it shall be forgiven him.
    Num 5:7 then he shall confess the sin which he has committed. He shall make restitution for his trespass in full, plus one-fifth of it, and give it to the one he has wronged.
    Num 5:8 But if the man has no relative to whom restitution may be made for the wrong, the restitution for the wrong must go to the LORD for the priest, in addition to the ram of the atonement with which atonement is made for him.
    you said
    ........The Mosaic Law forbade stealing, but Zaccheus had no problem stealing; however it was in the presence of Jesus that he made atonement and got SALVATION.

  • @chadwood1975
    @chadwood1975 2 роки тому +8

    The Fulfillment of the Law
    17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. 19 Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +12

    ​ @Turin21 *Bible teaches repentance. Not Penance:*
    1. Repentance - change of heart. Not Penance - work to atone for sins or pay for sins.
    2. Confess to God. 1 John 1:9. Not confess to R ct priest for absolving of sins.
    *Find me a verse that says penance in nt? You cant.*
    Mat 3:2 and saying, "Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand!"
    Mat 3:8 Therefore bear fruits worthy of repentance,
    Mat 3:11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.
    Mat 4:17 From that time Jesus began to preach and to say, "Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand."
    Mat 9:13 But go and learn what this means: 'I DESIRE MERCY AND NOT SACRIFICE.' For I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance."
    Mat 11:20 Then He began to rebuke the cities in which most of His mighty works had been done, because they did not repent:
    Mat 11:21 "Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the mighty works which were done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes.
    Mat 12:41 The men of Nineveh will rise up in the judgment with this generation and condemn it, because they repented at the preaching of Jonah; and indeed a greater than Jonah is here.
    Mar 1:4 John came baptizing in the wilderness and preaching a baptism of repentance for the remission of sins.
    Mar 1:15 and saying, "The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand. Repent, and believe in the gospel."
    Mar 2:17 When Jesus heard it, He said to them, "Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance."
    Mar 6:12 So they went out and preached that people should repent.
    Luk 3:3 And he went into all the region around the Jordan, preaching a baptism of repentance for the remission of sins,
    Luk 3:8 Therefore bear fruits worthy of repentance, and do not begin to say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father.' For I say to you that God is able to raise up children to Abraham from these stones.
    Luk 5:32 I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance."
    Luk 10:13 "Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the mighty works which were done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago, sitting in sackcloth and ashes.
    Luk 11:32 The men of Nineveh will rise up in the judgment with this generation and condemn it, for they repented at the preaching of Jonah; and indeed a greater than Jonah is here.
    Luk 13:3 I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish.
    Luk 13:5 I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish."
    Luk 15:7 I say to you that likewise there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine just persons who need no repentance.
    Luk 15:10 Likewise, I say to you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner who repents."
    Luk 16:30 And he said, 'No, father Abraham; but if one goes to them from the dead, they will repent.'
    Luk 17:3 Take heed to yourselves. If your brother sins against you, rebuke him; and if he repents, forgive him.
    Luk 17:4 And if he sins against you seven times in a day, and seven times in a day returns to you, saying, 'I repent,' you shall forgive him."
    Luk 24:47 and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
    Act 2:38 Then Peter said to them, "Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
    Act 3:19 Repent therefore and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, so that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord,
    Act 5:31 Him God has exalted to His right hand to be Prince and Savior, to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins.
    Act 8:22 Repent therefore of this your wickedness, and pray God if perhaps the thought of your heart may be forgiven you.
    Act 11:18 When they heard these things they became silent; and they glorified God, saying, "Then God has also granted to the Gentiles repentance to life."
    Act 13:24 after John had first preached, before His coming, the baptism of repentance to all the people of Israel.
    Act 17:30 Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now commands all men everywhere to repent,
    Act 19:4 Then Paul said, "John indeed baptized with a baptism of repentance, saying to the people that they should believe on Him who would come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus."
    Act 20:21 testifying to Jews, and also to Greeks, repentance toward God and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ.
    Act 26:20 but declared first to those in Damascus and in Jerusalem, and throughout all the region of Judea, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent, turn to God, and do works befitting repentance.
    Rom 2:4 Or do you despise the riches of His goodness, forbearance, and longsuffering, not knowing that the goodness of God leads you to repentance?
    2Co 7:9 Now I rejoice, not that you were made sorry, but that your sorrow led to repentance. For you were made sorry in a godly manner, that you might suffer loss from us in nothing.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +12

    ​ @Turin21 *95% of R Church doctrines were not from Scriptures yet you claimed its 100% R Catholic? Lolol. You dont read the Bible do you?*
    *​95% of Rc doctrines are unheard of in 1st century and not from traditions of Jesus and Apostles or Scriptures or contradicts Scriptures! Nt Church of the Bible had not heard or practised any of these Rc doctrines.*
    1. Purgatory 2. Confessing to priests 3. Office of pope or priests4. Pope being the vicar (representation of Christ, usurping the authority of God)5. Praying to Mary, saints6. Penance 7. Worshipping idols/images, placing idols images in church8. Church in the Bible is not building, but the body of believers9. Sacrament was never the real body and blood of Christ as RC church claimed (Real meaning real blood and body, bcos it didnt really turned "bloody" did it?)10. Salvation by (works (7sacraments) +faith) was never in the Bible. Real salvation is by grace through faith as seen in Bible. 11. Rosary, set repetitive prayers, hail Mary 10000 times12. Mass - putting Christ on the altar again and again13. Mary as queen of heaven 14. Mary as Ark of the new covenant. 15. Mary as the mother of heavenly Jesus thus Mary exist before Christ16. Immersion of infant for baptism17. Holy water18. Celibacy of priests (no office of priests in NT anyway, only priesthood of all believers)19. Kissing of statues20. Changing of 10 commandments. COmmandment of graven image removed by Catholic CHurch in Catholic Catechism. Splitting of another commandment into 2 commandments. 21. Catholic church changed Bible verse Gen 3:15 (And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise His heel."). 'He' and 'His' referring to Christ.
    Catholics changed it to (Gen 3:15 And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; She shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise Her heel.") 'She' and 'Her' refers to Mary. 22. Catholic Church use Rev 12 to refer to Mary as 'queen of heaven', when Rev 12:6 clearly refers to Israel escaping the Great Tribulation. Mary cannot be alive to escape the Great Tribulation. 23. Catholic Church refers to Mary as 'Queen of heaven', but 'Queen of Mary' in the Bible is a demonic entity Astoreth or Ishtar, the female deity partner of Baal. 5 verses in Jeremiah as proof.24. Catholic church refers to Mary as the Mediatress, Co redemptress, helper of Christ, firstborn of all creation ..
    Mary cannot be the mediatress. Jesus is the one and only Mediator between God and man. Only Jesus redeems. Only the Holy Spirit is the Helper sent by Jesus. Only Jesus is the firstborn of all creation. 25. Roman Catholicism has “saints” one can pray to in order to gain a particular blessing. For example, Saint Gianna Beretta Molla is the patron saint of fertility. Francis of Assisi is the patron saint of animals. There are multiple patron saints of healing and comfort.
    Nowhere is even a hint of this taught in Scripture. Just as the Roman pantheon of gods had a god of love, a god of peace, a god of war, a god of strength, a god of wisdom, etc., so the Catholic Church has a saint who is “in charge” over each of these and many other categories. Many Roman cities had a god specific to the city, and the Catholic Church provided “patron saints” for cities as well.26. Mary is called the gate of heaven? Mary has keys to paradise?
    Here are roman pagan teachers saying their man made goddess is their savior. None of these quotes have been denounced, on the contrary they are cited.
    "Open to us, O Mary, the gate of Paradise, since you have its keys! " St. Ambrose
    "God has entrusted the keys and treasures of Heaven to Mary." St. Thomas Aquinas
    "No one can enter into Heaven except through Mary, as entering through a gate. " St. Bonaventure
    "Mary is called "The Gate of Heaven" because no one can enter Heaven but through her means." St. Alphonsus Maria Liguori
    Papal infallibility
    Immaculate Mary
    Assumption of Mary
    Perpetual Virgin
    Mary as Mother of God,
    co mediatrix,
    co redemptrix,
    new ark of covenant,
    Pope as vicar,
    Holy Water,
    papacy,
    peter as first pope,
    papal succession,
    apostolic succession,
    indulgences,
    7 sacraments,
    rosary
    veneration of saints and statues
    celibacy of priesthood
    canonization of saints
    limbo
    you said
    Just read some of his writings. 100% Catholic

    • @luvpamelanewton
      @luvpamelanewton Місяць тому +1

      You nailed it.

    • @luvpamelanewton
      @luvpamelanewton Місяць тому +1

      You missed Mary's immaculate conception. She was conceived by natural means in Anna and Joachim old age like Sarah and Elizabeth. But they teach she conceived without her husband like Jesus Christ was conceived. That makes her divine. They needed to make her worthy in their opinion before God could use her even though it is the Holy Spirit who would cleanse her and prepare her for the conception to take place for the Son of God.

    • @luvpamelanewton
      @luvpamelanewton Місяць тому +2

      Yes their dogma is you have to go through Mary to get to God because it was through Mary that Jesus Christ was born. They give her the credit that belongs to Jesus Christ.

    • @luvpamelanewton
      @luvpamelanewton Місяць тому +2

      You also need to add they call her the Mother of God.
      While Mary was the mother of Jesus Christ in his humanity, she was not the Mother of God as if he has a beginning.

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 Місяць тому

      @@luvpamelanewton *Yes many more …*

  • @TheGospelAccordingToMarkyD
    @TheGospelAccordingToMarkyD 8 місяців тому +2

    Consider this for a moment. Since the undeniable, uncomfortable, and inconvenient truth does not change, then today's Christian’s truth must be on par with the truths expressed by the ancient Christians. Therefore, if I were to ask an Evangelical today, “What is your source for the foundation for truth?”, it wouldn't surprise me if they said, “The Bible.” However, since the Bible wasn't canonized until the 4th century, it would be impossible for the ancient Christians to affirm the Bible as their foundation for truth. But follow my logic before you offer a rebuttal. There were other writings of Peter and Paul that didn't make it into the Bible. Amongst the early Christians, there were other writings that many people considered as being the inspired word of God but didn't make it into the Bible. Determining what was considered Sacred Scripture was a matter of contention throughout the first four centuries. Therefore, for the early Christians, it would be impossible for them to assert the Bible as their foundation for truth. So a reasonable question one could ask is, “What did the ancient Christians gravitate to (as their foundation for truth) when there was no Bible?”
    Well we know what they believed because Paul taught that the CHURCH is the Pillar and Foundation for Truth (1 Timothy 3:15) and gave an example of how God manifests His Wisdom through Her (Ephesians 3:10). Now when Jesus explained that the Holy Spirit will guide and teach you all truths (John 14:26 & 16:13)...we know the “you” that Jesus was talking about was in regards to the Church…not to every individual because Jesus makes this explicitly clear when He instructed the people to listen to what the Holy Spirit says to the Church which He reinforced to ALL of the churches in the book of Revelation. He reinforced it 7 times (Revelation 2:7, 11, 17, 27 & 3:6,13, 22).
    Jesus didn't institute a Bible, He instituted a Church and instructed the Faithful to listen to her (Revelation 2:7, 11, 17, 27 & 3:6,13, 22). Now because of the misguided teachings of false pastors who have led many away from the Church…and since there was no Bible to lean on, Paul commanded the Faithful to adhere to the Traditions of the Church (2 Thessalonians 2:15)...lest they be led astray by some tickling of the ear (2 Timothy 4:3).
    If one's foundation for truth is not the same biblical Foundation for Truth that the ancient Faithful and historical Christianity taught and believed for 16 centuries, then their foundation has fallen apart causing their truth to be grounded on a foundation that has been reformed.
    I'll leave it at that so you can think about it.
    I would love to address all your objections if you are willing to have a peaceful and respectful dialogue with me.
    Your brother in Christ,
    Marky D. “In the House"

    • @brianwilliams-se5jy
      @brianwilliams-se5jy 5 місяців тому

      @TheGospelAccordingToMarkD you said it yourself, the truth does not change. As Paul said if anyone preaches another Gospel it is not a Gospel at all. If you have faith and believe then you know God made sure the Bible contains what he intended it to contain, the foundational scriptures of the old testament and the Gospel of Jesus for mans salvation in the new testament, it is finished

    • @TheGospelAccordingToMarkyD
      @TheGospelAccordingToMarkyD 5 місяців тому

      @@brianwilliams-se5jy Thanks for taking out the time to respond. As I respond back to you, I am hoping that you don't receive it as though I am sending it to you with a combative heart as I intend to conduct myself worthy of the Gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ (Philippians 1:27). With that said:
      During the Apostolic and infant stages of the Church, many fell away because of the influence of many false pastors who were leading the flock away. Groups began to form and splinter into Christian denominations such as the Nicolatians, Gnostics, Encratites, and Phrygians. Jesus even said that He HATES what the Nicolaitans were doing (Rev 2:6). This division and denomination formation all occurred before any letter of the Bible was even penned down and well afterwards.
      I agree with you 100% that “Paul said if anyone preaches another Gospel it is not a Gospel at all.” The reason Paul made that statement was because during his lifetime people were already preaching a false Gospel. So the point I'm trying to drive at is how would a pagan know (who is being introduced to a gospel) that they are being taught the proper Gospel since there was no Bible or scripture written down for them to compare notes to?
      Jesus also knew all this confusion was going on and that false gospels were being taught so He commanded the Body of Believers to listen to the Church (Rev 2:7, 11, 17, 27 & 3:6,13, 22). The reason why Jesus told the Body of Believers to listen to the Church was because the Spirit would speak through her and teach and guide her to all truths (John 14:26 & 16:13). Since you agree that “truth does not change”, it would follow that Jesus’ command for the Body of Believers to listen to the Church must be True today. Allow me to to give you a couple of examples why:
      If we stick to just the Bible ALONE, you and I would have a different understanding of 1 Thess 4:13-28 where you would probably have a modern day Protestant understanding of the Rapture. I would say “that's unbiblical” and point out that the Rapture scenario was concocted in the United States in the late 19th century by a Protestant Pastor named John Nelson Darby. I would further explain that it was Darby who formed his convictions according to a so-called "revelation" of a dream from a 15 year old little girl named Margaret MacDonald. In the course of time, he circulated his perspectives as footnotes within the Scofield Reference Bible but it didn't gain much traction. However, it began to gain momentum during the 1970's and grew like wildfire after the release of the book "The Late Great Planet Earth" by Hal Lindsey. The book became so popular that it was turned into a movie and catapulted the "Left Behind" series by Tim LaHaye. What's interesting is that the Reformation Fathers never taught the Rapture scenario since that was never how the passage was understood.
      When you set out to fact check my claims I would encourage you to also check into the understanding of 1 Thess 4:13-28 before John Nelson Darby derailed the historic interpretation? There's no doubt that you would find many Evangelical websites professing this to be true but you're not going to find any site explaining the interpretation before it was derailed. It would follow that in order to explore what was originally taught, one would have to appeal to how historical Christianity understood this passage.
      When the Book of Revelation was explained by Hippolytus of Rome (a disciple of Irenaeus, who was a disciple of Polycarp who was a disciple of St. John the Apostle), he gave no explanation of a Rapture type scenario. One would think that a Church Father, who was two teachers away from the Apostle John (who wrote the Book of Revelation) would have taught about Christians being caught up to Heaven.
      Now another interpretation that has gone off tangent is the perspective of Jesus’ last words on the cross "Tetelestai” (“It is finished’). When we contemplate the "it" that Jesus is referring to, many understand the "it" to mean something to the effect that…by His work of redemption and death on the Cross, there was nothing more needed that was necessary for our Salvation. However, John 19:30 needs to be understood in union to the context of other verses, in order to better understand what the "it" - is not.
      For starters, on the day before His Crucifixion, Jesus proclaimed that He had ALREADY finished the work that He was sent to do (John 17:4). Furthermore, Paul stated that Jesus was RAISED for our justification (Romans 4:25) and clarified that if He did NOT rise from the dead, we would STILL be in our sin (1 Cor 15:17). Paul also explained that we are renewed in the Holy Spirit (Titus 3:5-7) which is the seal that guarantees our inheritance (Eph 1:13-14). This would be made possible only AFTER the Cross (John 16:7; 7:38-39) With all this still needing to be done, that would mean that after Jesus cried out "Tetelestai" there were still many things Jesus had to do in order for us to be justified, renewed, and sealed by the Holy Spirit in order for us to be Saved and given the guarantee of our inheritance. Therefore, the perspective of the word "tetelestai", which DOES mean "it is finished" needs to be reevaluated since Jesus wasn't finished. However, since we cannot come to the same understanding from the Bible alone, it would follow that one of us would have to seek a better understanding which may entail diving deeper into Scripture and/or exploring a historical argument.
      In my experience, I have noticed that Protestants have no problem appealing to a historical perspective when it is favorable to their argument but when Catholics do the same thing, historical evidence is deemed irrelevant or unreliable. There seems to be a double standard. Nonetheless, I am of the opinion that since God's truth does not change, that truth (however inconvenient or uncomfortable it may be) should not change throughout historical Christianity. Therefore, the only way to test if one's interpretation of Scripture hasn't changed is by evaluating whether or not it can pass the test of time. In other words, if one’s interpretation of truth has gone off on a tangent from what has been understood throughout historical Christianity, then one's truth has been distorted. But I really want to be clear with what I am implying so let me say it this way. If you believe your interpretation is true, then that should be on par to how ancient Christians interpreted Scripture. Now there's only one way to find out. You have to read what they believed. I already mentioned how the interpretation of 1 Thess 4:13-28 does not pass the test of time but if the historical argument is not sought after, one might be stuck believing the fallacy of being Raptured up to Heaven. Please note that I am very well versed with the biblical roots of the Rapture interpretation so there's no need to break it down for me. What I'm trying to get you to do is to look into what was believed prior to Darby's derailment.
      Catholicism has no problem with Sola Scriptura - as long as Scripture is properly understood. But in order to understand how the Scripture passage was understood before it was distorted by John Nelson Darby, one has to appeal to the historical understanding. So as you can see in this case, Sola Scriptura only works if Scripture is properly understood. Otherwise, one has to depend on a historical argument. Now let's be honest. Protestants would have a field day if Catholicism taught a man-made doctrine that came from the mind of a little girl.
      There's more examples of how Protestants accept truths that have changed that I would love to reveal to you as long as you welcome me to share it with you. I just don't want you to think I'm attacking you or trying to win a fight. All I want is to win a Brother in Christ.

    • @brianwilliams-se5jy
      @brianwilliams-se5jy 5 місяців тому

      @@TheGospelAccordingToMarkyD where to start? Testing one's understanding or as you say "interpretation" of Scripture should be done as the Bereans did by comparing scripture to scripture not against the thoughts of early "church fathers" who may have been misled themselves (and many obviously were). As to there being 'no scripture or writings in the early days' of Jesus's followers that's simply not true , the Jewish scriptures existed as that's where the prophecy Jesus was fulfilling derived from. When Paul speaks of tradition he refers to the oral tradition he and the other Apostles have preached (which were written down along with the letters Paul wrote and scroll and parchments although not compiled in the form of the Bible we have today, biblia small books)not some future tradition, he actually warns against such. Col2:8
      The "Church" is the body of believers
      nothing else
      Those who preach/teach false Gospel are not part of it matter what "church" "religion" or "denominations" they belong to.
      As to 1Thes:13-18, "rapture" or what ever you care to call it is described pretty clearly and backed up in Rev7:13-17

    • @TheGospelAccordingToMarkyD
      @TheGospelAccordingToMarkyD 5 місяців тому

      @@brianwilliams-se5jy I thought you would have understood that my reference to there not being any Scripture was in regards to the New Testament. So at the time during the infant church, before the NT was established, no one could refer to NT Scripture (in the manner of the Bereans) to test what was/is the True Gospel. The authority was through the teaching of the Church. That's why Jesus told the church (small c - body of believers) to listen to the Church (big c - authoritative body). Now as I said before, I am well versed on the Scripture passages that Protestants lean on to support their doctrine of the Rapture but that was never the interpretation. That was never taught for 19 centuries. So what was the truth that Protestants taught before Darby derailed it?
      You pointed to the Book of Revelation but out of the 22 Books of Revelation, only two chapters are about the end times. Being Raptured up to Heaven is not even mentioned in the Book of Revelation. In reference to Rev 7:13-17, some link this with the "great tribulation" that Jesus warned would engulf the Roman world in connection with the violent conquest of Jerusalem (Matt 24:21); others link it with the Domitianic persecution of Christians near the end of the first century. So this is the point that I'm trying to make. Not all Protestants agree that Rev 7:13-17 is about the Rapture. If Bible Alone Protestants can't agree with the interpretation through the Bible alone, then they have to settle with agreeing to disagree or they can look into what has been the historical interpretation of “being caught up”.
      If you can't tell me what was understood prior to Darby, then it would follow that you believe something that was recently developed and that you have accepted a man made doctrine that is rooted from the mind of a little girl. It might be a hard pill to swallow but Darby concocted a man-made Protestant doctrine.
      I would also want you to look into what the "it" Jesus was referring to. However, since you see Church Fathers as unreliable, I would press you to explain (from the Bible alone) what was meant when Jesus said “it is finished" when there were things still needed to be done.
      In regards to Colossians 2:8, Paul warns the faithful about EXTERNAL traditions that do not come from the Church but admonishes them to STAND FIRM and HOLD TO THE TRADITIONS which you were taught by us. That is to say - the Church (2 Thessalonians 2:15). Although some Oral Traditions got written down, not all of oral Traditions were written down (John 21:25). For this reason Paul exhorts Timothy to guard what was entrusted to him because what has been professed, some have missed the mark in regards to the faith (1 Timothy 6:20-21).
      Now keep in mind, I'm not trying to be combative but I think these are things that need to be wrestled out.

    • @brianwilliams-se5jy
      @brianwilliams-se5jy 5 місяців тому

      @@TheGospelAccordingToMarkyD one thing at a time ... Church, there was no Church In Apostlic times.There were groups of followers/believers throughout the Roman empire that upheld the Gospel

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 Рік тому +5

    @purgatorean *Acts 2 Church was clearly not Roman Catholic Church was it? Lol*
    you said
    All Christians, Protestants and Catholics, agree that the Church that Christ said that He would build came into existence with the coming of the Holy Spirit on that Great Day of Pentecost in Acts chapter 2. Acts chapter 2 is the Biblical Blueprint for Sacramental Salvation, and ever since that Day of Pentecost,

  • @DanielA-wb3zy
    @DanielA-wb3zy 2 місяці тому +3

    Here are some traditions of men:
    A Holy Apostolic Succession - Nowhere to be found in God's word, including Peter's.
    The Bread and Wine require a priest to ring a bell before they change into body and blood - Nowhere to be found in God's word.
    Pope - Nowhere to be found in God's word.
    Men speaking with infallibility for God - Even the men over the ages that held titles signifying they had this power knew in their hearts they had no such authority and power. But they accepted the lie and the title anyway - Liars have no place in God's kingdom and teaching through deception of the faithful will require a greater punishment than murders receive. So those teaching they can speak FOR God, do not actually FEAR God.

    • @DanielA-wb3zy
      @DanielA-wb3zy 2 місяці тому +1

      @@denisosullivan4065 Sure it is. The Catholic church doesn't like this verse or John 3:16.
      16All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.
      Made perfect through scripture.
      If a church you attend teaches something different, they are liars.

    • @jt06061
      @jt06061 Місяць тому

      @@DanielA-wb3zy Actually I love that verse John 3;16 says God so love the world that he gave his only begotten son.
      Seriously, you need to get a clue maybe actually go study The history of the Church Christ founded, and the writings of the early church fathers, which by the way were the very disciples of the apostles.
      Ephesians 2:19-20 shows that the church is not built on the book, but on the foundation of Jesus, and the apostles with Jesus being the chief cornerstone. Matthew 16:16-18 tells us that Peter holds the role of being the rock on which Jesus build his church and this church that Jesus is building is a pillar that holds the truth up and supports it and a bulwark that keeps error out. Jesus = chief cornerstone, Peter = rock apostles, = foundation Church = pillar, and bulwark.
      Jesus did not build his Church upon the Bible that came out of the Church . Sacred scripture is along with the Old Testament what the church wrote down preserved, recognize as inspired and eventually after four centuries canonized, though the church was fully functional and on mission for all those centuries. 2Timothy.3:16-17 says all scripture is inspired and is useful for teaching reproof and correction and training and righteousness so that everyone who belongs to God may be proficient equipped for every good work so as you can see, it says all scripture it does not say only scripture.
      The Church did not have all of the New Testament when Paul wrote this that proves sola scrptura is a false doctrine. The new Testament was written distributed over decades and not canonized until the fourth century. It held a privileged place in worship and teaching, but is never said to be the soul , infallible authority, it is not subject to the private judgment of every individual Christian.
      2Thesalonians 2:15 Shows oral and written teaching, both had binding authority, not sola scriptura . The apostles didn’t write everything down. They also gave oral instruction as you can see in.1 Corinthians 11:2 Paul is telling the Corinthians to maintain the traditions. How can Paul expect Christians to hold to unwritten traditions if those weren’t binding?
      Luke 10:16 Jesus says he who hears you hears me he who rejects you rejects me, and he who rejects me rejects him who sent me. He didn’t tell the apostles to write a book and let the people read. No here he was giving his authority to the apostles to speak for him.
      Jesus didn’t just give us a book and say figure it out.
      The living magisterium is the perpetual gift of apostolic successors in each generation going back to the apostles, including Pete’s successor, and those bishops in communion with him. The successors of the apostles are given. The responsibility to guard and transmit the deposit of faith (scripture and tradition) Properly and faithfully interpreted in every time and place throughout Church history.
      In 2 Timothy 2:2 Timothy is told disseminate Christian truth, and not through a book but what he has been told orally by Paul.
      Titus 1:5 Paul leaves no room for whom Titus is to choose to be bishops. You can’t hold your own separate theology and choose to start your own denomination. Nowhere in the New Testament can we find a trajectory toward a book with sole infallible authority rather we find a church with authority in the New Testament Bible, found it by Jesus built on the apostles. Peter being the rock with both tradition and eventually scripture moving through history through apostolic succession, preserving and teaching the infallible truth of each generation. This is Catholic authority and it is the biblical model of authority that cannot fail, contrary to sola scriptura. which fails to produce, hence the 40,000 confused denominations.

    • @DanielA-wb3zy
      @DanielA-wb3zy Місяць тому

      @@jt06061 I am a member of the church Christ founded. The scriptures are able to make us perfect. Everything else is unnecessary and leads away from God
      The God of the Bible is not known to the Catholic cult. They worship Mary and a god made up by liars.

    • @DanielA-wb3zy
      @DanielA-wb3zy Місяць тому

      @@denisosullivan4065 No, it's God's invention. It is able to perfect us to all good works.
      False teachers claim that is nowhere in the Bible or that it means something different.

    • @quantumv8394
      @quantumv8394 12 днів тому

      @@DanielA-wb3zy v16 still doesn't say "works ALONE" as you think and v17 "unto all good works" means just that. Good works are the end result of scripture thus necessary for salvation. You can read scripture all day and still be a bad person but try calling someone who reads scripture and does good works all day a bad person. That's why good works are necessary in the whole equation for salvation. Nothing "ALONE" works.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +11

    ​ @Turin21 *You are wrong once again. Mat 16 never once said R Church inherited any authority of Peter. Not once. So where is your proof that it did happen? By empty claims?*
    *This is merely R Church's self claim. Not true in history and Scriptures.*
    you said
    But regardless Christ said (it's in the bible if you read it) "thou art Peter and upon this rock I ill build MY CHURCH" not churches! Jesus NEVER could have intended multiple "churches many with vastly different beliefs. Just think about it for a second. No matter how many foolish theories you have you can't get away from that verse. The bible can't contradict itself so you have to reconcile the whole bible and that's the Catholic teaching. You must come in line with the One Truth and not the Big L.

    • @celter56
      @celter56 2 місяці тому +3

      «this rock” is obviously Christ, not Peter

    • @luvpamelanewton
      @luvpamelanewton Місяць тому

      They omit Peter's response the Jesus Christ is the Son of God. That is what Jesus Christ builds His church on.

    • @luvpamelanewton
      @luvpamelanewton Місяць тому

      Peter is a pebble. Jesus Christ is the foundation.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +2

    ​ @Connor Mickelson *Clearly no answer? Since you do not read the Bible?*
    ​ *R Catholic Church has nothing to do with God and His Words.*
    1. Catholics say Mary was sinless. But BIBLE says Mary offered a sinner's offering. She was a sinner. Bible says Mary needed a Saviour. Lk 2:23-24, Lev 12:6-8, Rom 3:10.
    2. Catholics say clergies must be celibate. Yet BIBLE says Peter (supposed R Church first leader) had mother in law. Bible says celibacy is not a qualification for clergies. Mat 8:14-15, Mar 1:30-31, Luk 4:38-39.
    3. Catholics say Mary was forever virgin. Yet BIBLE says Jesus had brothers and sisters. Mary was not perpetually virgin. Mk 6:3, Mat 13:55, Mat 27:56, Mar 6:3, Mar 15:40, Mar 15:47.
    4. Catholics say confess to R priests in a box. BIBLE says nothing about confessing to priests in a box. Bible says confess to GOD only. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6, Romans 10:9-10.
    5. Catholics say drink of the literal blood of Jesus. Yet OT and NT both say do not drink blood. Acts 15, Lev 7:26.
    6. Catholics say pray to passed on Mary and "saints". Yet BIBLE says do not contact the dead. NT Church did not record a single case of NT believers asking passed on saints to pray for them. Deut 18:11, Isaiah 8:19.
    7. Catholics make and bow down to statues. BIBLE says do not bow down to graven images (statues). Deut 4, Exo 20:4-5.
    8. Catholics sprinkles “holy water”. But NT Church of the Bible mentioned nothing about “holy water”. There was no record of any Apostles sprinkling “holy water” on believers. Catholics claimed “holy water” came from OT. Yet Num 5:17 says “holy water” was water used to test adulterous women in OT temple. Hardly the same. Those were for Old Covenant Jews. Not New Testament Christians.
    9. Catholics say Peter was pope - bishop of all bishops. Yet BIBLE says Peter was just a leader of the Jerusalem Church. Bible says nothing of the office of bishop of bishops. Gal 2:9, Mat 16:18.
    10. Catholics say there is a seat of Peter. Yet BIBLE says nothing about it. Jesus said “not to lord over others”.
    11. Catholics has clergy priesthood. Bible says clergy priesthood was done away with in New Testament. There is no clergy priesthood in NT. Heb 7:27, 9:12, 10:10.
    12. Catholics preaches Works Salvation (faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved). Yet Bible says “believe in Jesus to be saved”. Bible says Works Salvation is cursed. Gal 1:8-9. Acts 16:30-31, John 3:16, Romans 10:9-10.
    13. Catholics says they must do Penance to atone for their sins. Yet Bible says repent, confess and sins will be forgiven. Catholic Bible changes the word “repentance” in NT into “penance”. Original Greek NT does not use or mean the word penance. Penance = work to atone for sins. Repentance = change of heart. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6.
    14. Catholics say Mary went straight to heaven without dying. Yet Bible says nothing about it.
    15. Catholics say Islam and Christianity have the same GOD. Yet Islam doesn't believe in death and resurrection of Jesus and Trinity.

  • @RobertSmith-bs4hl
    @RobertSmith-bs4hl 2 роки тому +15

    My boss is Catholic and I wouldn't like to call myself Protestant just somebody who drives their best to read the Bible and follow that alone and I try not to read any bias out of the Bible this means that there are things in the Bible that I might not like to have believed but I have to in order to follow Jesus Christ, so my boss's Catholic and I was talking to him about the Bible and he says I'm not really into that I'm more about the traditions and I thought it was interesting that the Bible said in Jesus said do not let your dishes get in the way of the word of God and he doesn't read the word of God he only goes by the traditions

    • @brucewmclaughlin9072
      @brucewmclaughlin9072 2 роки тому +2

      @@margaretlobo9466 John 21:25 does not say the scriptures are insufficient , it says that there are more things that Jesus did that are not recorded, that is not insufficient at all. 2 Tim 3:15-17 Paul tells Timothy that EVERYTHING he needs to be thoroughly equipped is in the scriptures ( old testament ) and that is what the early church had.
      Moreover, Paul confirms below that the ( Catholic ) Church is the Pillar and ground of Truth. This is because the Church is the Body of Christ
      Yes the church is the body of Christ but lets not designate it by a name that Jesus Himself never gave it. What does Jesus call His church? Matthew 16:18

    • @brucewmclaughlin9072
      @brucewmclaughlin9072 2 роки тому +3

      @@margaretlobo9466
      The Sola Scriptura - Scripture Alone - of Protestantism is not in the Bible.
      You are correct there is no verse that says scripture only , however we do see that the majority of doctrines are either stated or by example. The example set by Jesus and the apostles was to quote scripture as proof.
      3 Proofs
      First - In 2 Timothy 3:16-17 we read that Scripture is given to equip us for - Every - Good Work
      16 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.
      So what part of thoroughly means you need more?
      Second - Matt. 7. [21] Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
      What is the Father's will ??
      Matthew chapter 6 states that the Father who sees in secret will - reward - Prayers, Fasting, Almsgiving and Good Works. Obviously, the Father rewards us for carrying out His will in the above actions which shows our Love for God and Neighbour, as Jesus commanded - not suggested. Here - Love - is a verb or action word.
      This last statement has absolutely nothing to do with scripture alone being not good enough!
      Third - Because we are responsible for all sins after Baptism, Jesus on the very day of His Resurrection from the dead, breathed His Spirit and - empowered - all the Apostles to forgive - or retain - Sins - John 20:22-23. This breathing was the same as the Breath that gave the life-force to the earth-created Adam - Genesis 2:7.
      Yes ,we are responsible to confess our sins as believers , but we confess those sins to the one who will cleanse us of ALL unrighteousness not to someone standing in for Christ who has no power to forgive sins . 1 John 1:9
      God in his justice uses “the blood of Jesus his Son [to cleanse] us from all sin” (1 John 1:7). Sin does not go unpunished. God’s Son took the punishment for us. That is the only way this forgiveness, this cleansing, is just. The debt has been paid. Not only do we get to bring the pain of our sin to God, but we get to bring our sinned-against pain to God. He leaves no debt unpaid. He not only provides forgiveness to each and every one of us, but he provides the grace for us to forgive one another.
      Therefore Catholics confess to their Priests, as Apostles don't live forever. Confession thus restores the Life-Force to souls deadened by sin, especially Deadly ( Mortal ) sins -
      This is where the truth gets blurred as Jesus died for ALL of your sins and if you read Eph 2:1-8 you will see that being born again which is a must have, just like repentance , that God has placed your spirit ( born again part of you ) with Jesus in the heavenly realm with Jesus . Your spirit does not and is not capable of sin. Your flesh is what we live in and is gradually changed by the renewing of our minds by the Holy Spirit who not only seals us to the day of redemption but carries on His renewing of your flesh till the day you pass on.
      Amazingly enough there is no verse that even hints that you can lose your God given gift of salvation , or that the Holy Spirit will remove His seal upon the believer for any reason or that God will remove your spirit from the heavenly realm with Jesus for any sin.
      Why ?because when we repent Jesus forgives ALL of our sins past, present, and future .
      This is not what you have been taught .
      You have been taught to listen to the roman Catholic church and lean not to personal interpretation as found in 2 Peter 1:20 but read the context and you find that verse 20 is with ,not separate from, verse 21 which explains what is being talked about.
      James 5:16-17. Protestants don't confess and thereby retain their sins.
      16 Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person is powerful and effective.
      Therefore confess your sins one to another for Forgiveness?
      No it clearly says you and I are to confess our sins to each other for healing not forgiveness of sins.
      It also claims that the righteous mans prayer is powerful and effective . When we become believers and confess our sins to God 1 John 1:9
      If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness”
      So if we are cleansed from ALL unrighteousness what are we left with? That's right we now have the righteousness of Christ and can pray effectively.
      And because we still retain our Fallen Natures, Jesus has given us His Flesh to eat and Blood to drink as - Real Food and Drink - for Eternal Life - John 6:53-58.
      Yes this sounds good but the Passover meal that Jesus had on the last night of His life where He said do this in remembrance of Me , did not have a single glass of wine but four of them, and the host otherwise known as Matzo was a special wafer not a cracker.
      Matzah or matzo is an unleavened flatbread that is part of Jewish cuisine and forms an integral element of the Passover festival
      So take another look at 1 Corinthians 11
      ;20-27 and you see why there is an admonition in verse 27 . Context makes this verse 27 clear .
      (Ephesians 2:10) For we are God's handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.
      Eph 2:9 tells us that nothing we do is good enough and verse 10 tells us that we were created to do the work of God. Not one verse in Ephecians tells us to work for salvation but several verses telling us that it is by grace and God's gift . Works has nothing to do with salvation.
      And James declared - Faith without works is dead -James 2:26).
      Lets have a look at James 1:1 who is James addressing?
      Hmmmn not the gentiles . James is telling the Jews that they have faith in God but that faith will not save the, ? Why ? Because the Jews had faith in God but did not accept Jesus as their messiah. Jesus addresses the Jews and tells them clearly John 6:27 Do not work for food that perishes, but for food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For on Him God the Father has placed His seal of approval.” 28T hen they inquired, “What must we do to perform the works of God?” 29 Jesus replied, “The work of God is this: to believe in the One He has sent.”…
      It is so much easier to grab a verse out of context and show all what you think it means
      By "Sola Scriptura" Protestants are only receiving part of Divine Truth. Catholics, on the other hand, hold the whole truth
      When you are taught the word but not the meaning you can come to the conclusion so many people make about scripture only.
      Sola Scriptura is saying that The New Testament is the Life and Teachings of Jesus and the original Apostles and the First Churches.. Sola Scriptura just points to THEM not just the Holy Spirit inspired Words, but the Holy Spirit inspired Authors/leaders and their Proven Authority as the true source to prove or test or Disprove future so called 'leaders' or future claims and teachings. Sola Scriptura means going all the way back directly to Jesus, John, Paul, James, Peter, Mark, Luke, Matthew, Moses, David, etc.. and going back to Their Lives, and Their preserved written teachings and traditions. Sola scriptura skips the questionable 'middle-men'.... thousands of years of Post New Testament groups and so called 'leaders' and takes you back to the first Source Leaders that were confirmed and are not questionable. This is the best way. Skip Luther and Skip the Vatican and just Learn the Truth Directly from Moses, David, Jesus, John, Paul, James, Peter, Etc... Please read the whole New Testament... you will find no popes, no cathedrals, no Statues, no Marian dogmas, no prayers to dead saints, No Vatican, No wafers, No fancy Robes, No Christian thrones. Please Follow Jesus and Him Alone.
      Since the Bible doesn't contradict itself, any interpretation of a specific passage that contradicts the general teaching of the Bible is to be rejected.
      Just remember that we ,you and I , have been told by someone else what the other believes and does. example -Denominational believers sit around in coffee shops swilling coffee and depend on a dead faith that does nothing for anyone ? Spiritual pride says we are better than them!
      John 14:6 excludes anyone other than Jesus!
      Thanks for your reply and be blessed by our savior Jesus.

    • @suzanneperez3747
      @suzanneperez3747 2 роки тому +1

      Yet you feel so comfortable criticizing his faith , how absolutely precious

    • @suzanneperez3747
      @suzanneperez3747 2 роки тому

      If he goes to mass regularly he DOES read the Bible , we read old AND new plus gospel ! Dork

    • @suzanneperez3747
      @suzanneperez3747 2 роки тому

      @@margaretlobo9466 great job! You are so correct

  • @jediv3381
    @jediv3381 Рік тому +5

    ​ @Men of Virtue *Still dodging .... R Church teach dodging? Where in the Bible says "Only R Church can interpret Scriptures" or "R Church is infallible interpreter"?*

  • @doreenfernandes2431
    @doreenfernandes2431 2 роки тому +44

    🌿🌻 Thank you Jesus for the BIBLE which is very enlightening !

    • @dennis1662
      @dennis1662 2 роки тому +12

      Jesus did not give us the Bible. The Church did. And you accept Catholic Scriptures but refuse Her interpretations of it. The Bible is the teachings of the Church and is only a guide to what the Church teaches

    • @MsRose432
      @MsRose432 2 роки тому +1

      Amen

    • @brucewmclaughlin9072
      @brucewmclaughlin9072 2 роки тому +8

      @@dennis1662 Jesus gave us the church and He gave us His written word. Oral tradition sounds good but oral changes over time and as it is not written down can not be verified as to it's truth over the centuries. Stick with the scriptures which are God's word to us and when you dispute anything use scriptures not what you heard or what you think the bible says.
      The Bible is the teachings of the Church and is only a guide to what the Church teaches
      reminds me of Homer Simpson telling his son that a speed limit is only a suggestion.

    • @bryanlentz7160
      @bryanlentz7160 2 роки тому +1

      @@dennis1662 😆

    • @miriampoe5507
      @miriampoe5507 2 роки тому +7

      Do you know that the New Testament are Catholic books? If it weren't for the Catholic Church, you wouldn't have the New Testament!!

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

    ​ @Michael *Bible is clear:*
    - Salvation is Not By Works (⭐By Faith Alone⭐) - Eph 2:8-9
    - Saved to do good works (⭐Not By Faith Alone⭐) - Eph 2:10, James 2, 1 Cor 13, Gal 5:22, Mat 25.
    you said
    .....St. Paul says in 1 Cor. 13, " If I have faith to move mountains, but have not love/charity.........I am nothing." YOU keep YOUR faith; we, catholics will have that personal relationship with Christ when we feed/house/clothe/and comfort Him via the least as is written in Matt. 25: 31-45.

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      Jesus declared SALVATION in Luke 19: 9. Read the story.

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

      ​ @Michael *R Catholics love tales. Zacchaeus was in Old Covenant. Not New Covenant. Z was merely doing restitution (restoring of goods) commanded by Mosaic Law.*
      you said
      Jesus declared SALVATION in Luke 19: 9. Read the story.

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

      ​ @Michael *Still dodging? Where in the Bible teaches allthesensofRCt: "faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved?" Pls answer. Stop dodging Mike Teixeira.*

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      @@faithalone2171..........The Mosaic Law forbade stealing, but Zaccheus had no problem stealing; however it was in the presence of Jesus that he made atonement and got SALVATION.

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@Michael-nb4ng *Bible does not say its atonement. Jesus merely asked Z to make restitution. Not atonement for sins. No man can atone for sins except Jesus.*
      *Z did not get Salvation because of restitution. He got salvation because he truly believed in Jesus.*
      Exo 22:3 If the sun has risen on him, there shall be guilt for his bloodshed. He should make full restitution; if he has nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft.
      Exo 22:5 "If a man causes a field or vineyard to be grazed, and lets loose his animal, and it feeds in another man's field, he shall make restitution from the best of his own field and the best of his own vineyard.
      Exo 22:6 "If fire breaks out and catches in thorns, so that stacked grain, standing grain, or the field is consumed, he who kindled the fire shall surely make restitution.
      Exo 22:12 But if, in fact, it is stolen from him, he shall make restitution to the owner of it.
      Lev 5:16 And he shall make restitution for the harm that he has done in regard to the holy thing, and shall add one-fifth to it and give it to the priest. So the priest shall make atonement for him with the ram of the trespass offering, and it shall be forgiven him.
      Num 5:7 then he shall confess the sin which he has committed. He shall make restitution for his trespass in full, plus one-fifth of it, and give it to the one he has wronged.
      Num 5:8 But if the man has no relative to whom restitution may be made for the wrong, the restitution for the wrong must go to the LORD for the priest, in addition to the ram of the atonement with which atonement is made for him.
      you said
      ........The Mosaic Law forbade stealing, but Zaccheus had no problem stealing; however it was in the presence of Jesus that he made atonement and got SALVATION.

  • @wjtruax
    @wjtruax 2 роки тому +20

    I am a life-long protestant with a better than average grasp of hermeneutics. I am also on the cusp of converting to Roman Catholicism, so I was interested in this title because I thought it might give me pause. I was thoroughly disappointed. Frankly, besides the young preacher's snarky comments, his hermeneutics are so bad that I'm stunned that the church has posted this for all to see. For the good of your church's reputation, I recommend you take it down. Two simple examples: First, the speaker clearly did not have a grasp of why the Apostle Paul wrote the letter to the Galatians. He said (~3:45 ff.) , "Galatians was written by the Apostle Paul to Christians that had had been saved out of Judaism. In this book, Paul warns them not to revert back to Judaism." Wrong. That was the book of Hebrews. The church in Galatia (a region, not a city) was comprised primarily of gentiles. Paul wrote to them because they were being deceived by false teachers who told them that, in order to be truly Christian, they had to follow Jewish ceremonial laws, with the most critical being circumcision. Paul's tirade against circumcision in the letter makes no sense if he was writing to a church full of Jewish converts to Christianity who had all been circumcised as infants.
    Second, the speaker's use of 1 Thess 2:13 as a proof text against the authority of sacred tradition (~37:56 ff.) is a horrible twist of Scripture and context. In context, this letter is the first communication that the Apostle Paul has had with the church in Thessaloniki since he was there teaching face-to-face. The Apostle's words seem very straight-forward - the Thessalonians heard the word that Paul preached to them (verbally - "...that you received the word of God you HEARD from us..."). What did Paul extol them for? For hearing his teaching and believing it. That is the essence of what the Catholic (and Orthodox) Church means when they talk of sacred tradition - what the Apostles taught in their years and years of ministry that could not possibly be contained in Scripture. Paul spent about three years ministering in Ephesus. He spent about eighteen months in Corinth. Is it reasonable that those churches flushed everything Paul taught them over those years after they heard he had been martyred? If the great Apostle had taught you for three years but only sent one short letter after his departure, would you forget everything he taught by word of mouth and only cling to what was written in the letter? 1 Thess 2:13 is a much better proof text for the validity of sacred tradition than against it.
    Well-meaning men are resorting to hermeneutic gymnastics like these in order to try to justify Sola Scriptura. Not only is it unbecoming, but it is disingenuous. Multiple times in the presentation the speaker cited a verse and then said, "We believe that means..." That is not authoritative at all! When Sola Scriptura proponents say, "The Bible is my final authority," what they are really saying is that their preferred interpretation of Scripture is what they hold to as authoritative. "The Bible" cannot exercise authority. Some human person or institution must interpret Scripture and put some authority behind it. Acts 2:38 and 1 Pet 3:21 both certainly sound like baptism is salvific, but I'm sure you would say that baptism is not necessary for salvation. Before the Swiss reformer Zwinglgi, no one of any import had ever taught anything other than the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist (bread & wine of the Lord's table). Now I'm sure that your church teaches that, "Take, eat, this is my body that is broken for you," doesn't really mean that the bread somehow becomes Christ's body, though that is what all Christians believed for 1500 years. Different protestant churches who wholly agree on Sola Scriptura and Sola Fide cannot agree on the meaning and mode of baptism or the meaning mode of the Lord's Supper, the only two sacraments most protestants retain. If protestant churches, who all claim that Scripture is totally sufficient and perspicacious, cannot agree as to what the Bible teaches about these two things, what does sufficiency even mean?
    A real conversation is invited. Snarky comments will be ignored.

    • @Two_Bluebirds
      @Two_Bluebirds 2 роки тому +4

      William Truax, God bless you!

    • @salvation4all313
      @salvation4all313 2 роки тому +7

      Why would you want to convert to catholicism? It has a weakling Jesus who cannot completely save anyone. That's why it has a purgatory belief. The Catholic Church does NOT believe that Jesus' Sacrifice and shed blood on the Cross complete cleanses a believing sinner of all their sins. In other words the Catholic Church does not believe the true gospel.
      You should instead attend a Bible Church where the true gospel is preached that Jesus Christ is strong and mighty to save!

    • @wjtruax
      @wjtruax 2 роки тому +10

      @@salvation4all313 I’m 54 years old and have attended strong evangelical churches since I was 10. I met my wife through an evangelical fellowship in college. We raised our kids as evangelical Protestants, teaching them the five Solas as unquestionable truth.
      Why would I want to convert? Because that is where Christ is. I find more grace, mercy, and love in Catholic theology than I ever found in the Protestant world. All Protestant theology starts with a framework - five Solas, predestination, free will, etc. - and then has to mutilate Scriptural context and obvious clarity to get the Bible to agree with its preconceived notion of what the passage “has” to mean according to the given framework.
      The primary - almost universal- Protestant framework is Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA), the concept that Christ took our punishment on the cross and imputes his perfect righteousness to us. If that is true, why didn’t our Lord ever teach that about himself in the Gospels? In the parable of the Prodigal Son, the father freely forgives the son who has disrespected his father, lived a life of open rebellion and sin, and squandered his inheritance. If our Lord were intending to teach PSA, it would make sense for the story to include the older son exchanging himself for his brother. That doesn’t happen. The father simply forgives the repentant son who freely submits himself, once again, to the father’s authority.
      And what do you do with passages such as Luke 5:17-26 & 7:36-50 in which the Lord declares sins forgiven by people who, apparently, didn’t even ask for it? In the story of the paralytic (Lk 5:17-26) it appears that Jesus saw the faith of the friends - by their actions - and then declared the paralyzed man forgiven.
      I’ve spent two full years wrestling with these theological questions. Have you ever changed your mind when someone talked to you like you were an idiot? If you really want to persuade me, talk to me like I am a rational human being and try to understand my perspective first.

    • @salvation4all313
      @salvation4all313 2 роки тому +5

      @@wjtruax The story of the prodigal son included these very important verses which you didn't mention:
      “The son said to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you. I am no longer worthy to be called your son.’ But the father said to his servants, ‘Quick! Bring the best robe and put it on him. Put a ring on his finger and sandals on his feet. Bring the fattened calf and kill it. Let’s have a feast and celebrate."
      (Luke 15:21-23)
      So you see a fattened calf is prepared, and a party is held (notice that blood was shed = atonement for sin, Hebrews 9:22). Fatted calves in those times were saved for special occasions such as the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 23:26-32)

    • @wjtruax
      @wjtruax 2 роки тому +3

      @@salvation4all313 Thank you for your reply. However, I could not disagree more with your conclusion. The fattened calf was killed in celebration, not in atonement. No one payed the father back for the money the son wasted or the pain he caused the father. There is no indication, at all, that the father would not have accepted the son if the calf hadn't been killed. Again, if the older son had taken the younger son's place, that would be a clear indication of substitutionary atonement. But that clearly did not happen. If the father had said to the older son, "Son, I'm sorry, but there is now only enough money for one son. I am choosing your brother over you. I'm sending you away," that would equate to the scapegoat being sent out of the camp. I reiterate, not once did our Lord, in any of his parables, indicate anything that even approximates penal substitutionary atonement.
      Christ died on the eve of Passover as the Lamb of God. Please go back and read the account of the first Passover in Exodus. The spotless lamb was killed and eaten ("Take, eat, this is my body, broken for you...Take, drink, this is my blood shed for you") and its blood spread on the doorframe as a sign of obedience to God and identity with His people. The Passover lamb was a sign of ransom from captivity, not of atonement for sin. Sacrifices for sin would not come until later. But even then, how many times did the God tell the Israelites that He was tired of their sacrifices and desired them, instead, to soften their hearts, obey, and love Him?

  • @MonstersOfTheUniverse
    @MonstersOfTheUniverse 2 роки тому +10

    Nobody said the popes were perfect…
    but they cannot change the teaching of Christ

    • @ValensRocks
      @ValensRocks Рік тому +1

      Oh they think they can- and there certainly are followers who think he is the holy father. That’s disgusting.

    • @Peter-zh5mv
      @Peter-zh5mv Рік тому

      How come the pope, God on earth, isn't perfect? You blind Catholics follow an imperfect man.

    • @HealthWyze
      @HealthWyze 5 місяців тому

      They can and do.

    • @kdmdlo
      @kdmdlo 3 місяці тому

      @@HealthWyze Name one way in which a Pope has ever, ever taught canonically in a way that is contrary to Christ.

    • @Swordoftruth289
      @Swordoftruth289 2 місяці тому

      Yes, they do, constantines creed 325, denocouced all jwish traditions and created the Christians traditions we practice today, even Sunday worship.

  • @PInk77W1
    @PInk77W1 2 роки тому +7

    Jesus started one church and said it would last forever
    The Roman Catholic Church

    • @rexpowell7349
      @rexpowell7349 2 роки тому +5

      I could not in good conscience follow a Pope who is a mere man like the rest of us who claim to take the place of Jesus or claimed they have the power to change God's laws. No thanks.

    • @drendaparfitt7417
      @drendaparfitt7417 2 роки тому

      Amen, Rex

    • @slhoya1
      @slhoya1 2 роки тому

      What laws has the Pope changed? Any of the 10 Commandments? If so, which ones?

    • @PInk77W1
      @PInk77W1 2 роки тому +1

      @@rexpowell7349 did people follow Moses ?
      Was Moses a man like the rest of us ?
      Did people follow the apostles?
      Were the apostles men like the rest of us ?
      Do u not have a pastor at your church that u follow ?
      “They remained faithful to the teaching of the apostles”
      Acts 2:42

    • @PInk77W1
      @PInk77W1 2 роки тому

      @@slhoya1 the Roman Catholic Church is unchangeable.

  • @jediv3381
    @jediv3381 9 місяців тому +1

    ​ @iggyantioch *That's Old Testament. Not even New Covenant. ANd that's not even Penance. That's humbling oneself and repentance before God with fasting. Not Penance as if Ahab could atone for his own sins.*
    *In other words you are misquoting Scriptures. New Covenant totally did not have "penance" of Roman pagan religion.*
    you said
    My own sins?
    Here is a scripture on penance
    And when Ahab heard those words, he rent his clothes, and put sackcloth upon his flesh, and fasted and lay in sackcloth, and went about dejectedly. And the word of the Lord came to Elijah the Tishbite, saying, ‘Have you seen how Ahab has humbled himself before me? Because he has humbled himself before me, I will not bring the evil in his days'” (1 Kgs. 21:27-29).
    “[B]ecause your heart was penitent, and you humbled yourself before the Lord . . . and you have rent your clothes and wept before me, I also have heard you, says the Lord” (2Kgs. 22:19).
    “Then I turned my face to the Lord God, seeking him by prayer and supplications with fasting and sackcloth and ashes” (Dan. 9:3).
    “For it is for thy sake that I have borne reproach, that shame has covered my face. . . . For zeal for thy house has consumed me, and the insults of those who insult thee have fallen on me. When I humbled my soul with fasting, it became my reproach. When I made sackcloth my clothing, I became a byword to them” (Ps. 69:7-11)

  • @wandasmith9180
    @wandasmith9180 2 роки тому +37

    Read for yourself, study the church history for yourself...You are listening to his interpretation, which is why there is 42,000 different Protestant religions, they can't agree on anything. ☹️

    • @TruthOverFacts1
      @TruthOverFacts1 2 роки тому +6

      Well said.

    • @wandasmith9180
      @wandasmith9180 2 роки тому +4

      @domcom fermi I must have hit a nerve.That 83 year old man has devoted his life in following in the foot steps of Christ to love God and love your neighbor.. I wish I could say I was like him, but I'm not because of people like you.☹️

    • @wandasmith9180
      @wandasmith9180 2 роки тому +1

      @domcom fermi yeap, must be Baptist..

    • @wandasmith9180
      @wandasmith9180 2 роки тому +2

      @domcom fermi hey my friend if that what you want to believe, then more power to you...I will keep this simple...Go on line and ask: who started the Roman Catholic Church...so that's who I'm following ❤️

    • @HaMashiachSaves
      @HaMashiachSaves 2 роки тому +7

      Well they do actually all agree on one thing, don’t they; namely Catholicism, and all its smells and bells, is not biblical 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @MonstersOfTheUniverse
    @MonstersOfTheUniverse 2 роки тому +5

    This guy clearly does NOT understand Catholic doctrine …
    He uses straw men arguments. Btw Jesus didn’t condemn all Jews. He himself was a Jew.
    Christ established the church and there’s a difference between Tradition and tradition.
    CATHOLIC BELIEF: Salvation is through GRACE it is a gift
    But we have to accept it
    When we do not follow His commandments we reject his grace
    Therefore good works are owed to Him.
    BUT WE ARE SAVED ONLY BY GRACE OF GOD

    • @luvpamelanewton
      @luvpamelanewton Місяць тому

      That isn't Catholic dogma. I have your dogma. That is not what is taught.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +5

    ​ @Turin21 *Yes from day 1 you make claims until now. So where is your proof?*
    *- I asked: where in the Bible or history says R Church = the Church Christ founded or the Universal Church?
    - You answered: Jesus founded the Universal Church. Lol.
    *Even kindergartenkids know you are not answering my question.*
    you said
    It was designed by Jesus Himself to be the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic church. So from day 1 to answer your question.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

    @Turin21 *First, it has never been Bible alone. It has always been Scripture Alone. How we know? Jesus, Apostles and nt all demonstrated that.*
    *Jesus and apostles all appealed to Scriptures only as support for doctrines. They did that 150 times in nt alone. They did not appeal to traditions of Pharisees and Moses as doctrines. NT church of the Bible also appealed to “what God says” and “what God said” as support for doctrines at Jerusalem Council. Acts 15. Not traditions. Isn’t that good enough proof Christians should only take doctrines from Scriptures only?*
    Mat 2:5 So they said to him, "In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet:
    Mat 4:4 But He answered and said, "It is written, 'MAN SHALL NOT LIVE BY BREAD ALONE, BUT BY EVERY WORD THAT PROCEEDS FROM THE MOUTH OF GOD.' "
    Mat 4:6 and said to Him, "If You are the Son of God, throw Yourself down. For it is written: 'HE SHALL GIVE HIS ANGELS CHARGE OVER YOU,' and, IN THEIR HANDS THEY SHALL BEAR YOU UP, LEST YOU DASH YOUR FOOT AGAINST A STONE.' "
    Mat 4:7 Jesus said to him, "It is written again, 'YOU SHALL NOT TEMPT THE LORD YOUR GOD.' "
    Mat 4:10 Then Jesus said to him, "Away with you, Satan! For it is written, 'YOU SHALL WORSHIP THE LORD YOUR GOD, AND HIM ONLY YOU SHALL SERVE.' "
    Mat 11:10 For this is he of whom it is written: 'BEHOLD, I SEND MY MESSENGER BEFORE YOUR FACE, WHO WILL PREPARE YOUR WAY BEFORE YOU.'
    Mat 21:13 And He said to them, "It is written, 'MY HOUSE SHALL BE CALLED A HOUSE OF PRAYER,' but you have made it a 'DEN OF THIEVES.'"
    Mat 26:24 The Son of Man indeed goes just as it is written of Him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been good for that man if he had not been born."
    Mat 26:31 Then Jesus said to them, "All of you will be made to stumble because of Me this night, for it is written: 'I WILL STRIKE THE SHEPHERD, AND THE SHEEP OF THE FLOCK WILL BE SCATTERED.'
    *Even nt Church of the Bible (Apostles and elders) appealed to the Word of God for determination of doctrines in Acts 15. The council did not decide based on their own words; neither on traditions of Pharisees or Moses. They based their decisions on "WHAT GOD SAID". Yes they met at Jerusalem council Acts 15 to discuss. But they appeal to what God says. Using God's word to decide what to do!*
    *Bible says decision was made by Apostles and elders. Not single leader Peter!! (let alone pope). Acts 15:6, 16:4.*
    Act 15:6 Now the apostles and elders came together to consider this matter.
    Act 16:4 And as they went through the cities, they delivered to them the decrees to keep, which were determined by the apostles and elders at Jerusalem.
    *1. Peter appealed using what God told him:*
    to him rgd his vision of the clean and unclean animals in Acts 10..
    That gentiles are accepted.
    Act 10:13 And a voice came to him, "Rise, Peter; kill and eat."
    Act 10:14 But Peter said, "Not so, Lord! For I have never eaten anything common or unclean."
    Act 10:15 And a voice spoke to him again the second time, "What God has cleansed you must not call common."
    Act 15:7 And when there had been much dispute, Peter rose up and said to them: "Men and brethren, you know that a good while ago God chose among us, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe.
    *2. James appealed using the Word of God:*
    Act 15:13 And after they had become silent, James answered, saying, "Men and brethren, listen to me:
    Act 15:14 Simon has declared how God at the first visited the Gentiles to take out of them a people for His name.
    Act 15:15 And with this the words of the prophets agree, just as it is written:
    Act 15:16 'AFTER THIS I WILL RETURN AND WILL REBUILD THE TABERNACLE OF DAVID, WHICH HAS FALLEN DOWN; I WILL REBUILD ITS RUINS, AND I WILL SET IT UP;
    Act 15:17 SO THAT THE REST OF MANKIND MAY SEEK THE LORD, EVEN ALL THE GENTILES WHO ARE CALLED BY MY NAME, SAYS THE LORD WHO DOES ALL THESE THINGS.'
    Act 15:18 "Known to God from eternity are all His works.
    Act 15:19 Therefore I judge that we should not trouble those from among the Gentiles who are turning to God,
    *3. Apostles Barnabas and Paul appealed to the “works of GOD done on the Gentiles”.*
    Act 15:12 Then all the multitude kept silent and listened to Barnabas and Paul declaring how many miracles and wonders God had worked through them among the Gentiles.
    you said
    WHERE DOES THE BIBLE SAY THAT IT HAS TO BE IN BIBLE ALONE TO BE TRUE?
    (Tradition) So once again WHERE DOES THE BIBLE SAY IT HAS TO BE IN THE BIBLE ALONE TO BE TRUE ? None of your arguments hold any water until you answer that one question but unfortunately for you , you will NEVER be able to do so. It's not there.

  • @jediv3381
    @jediv3381 2 роки тому +4

    ​ @Michael Speyrer *1. You havent proven its accepted by every branch. You merely claimed. 2. Accepted does not mean its truth. Bible says God's Word is truth. Jn **17:17**. So where in the Bible says that? You are telling me all these churches just pluck the doctrine from the air?*
    you said
    I already gave it to you. You rejected it even though its accepted by every single branch of the Church Catholic and Orthodox

  • @Armygirl4Christ
    @Armygirl4Christ 11 місяців тому +20

    Thank you! Excellent sermon exposing this dark, false religion.

    • @Lucerna999
      @Lucerna999 11 місяців тому

      Heretic.

    • @iggyantioch
      @iggyantioch 9 місяців тому +1

      So sad that you're not One with the Catholic Church
      Come home.

    • @tempelhoferfeld7727
      @tempelhoferfeld7727 9 місяців тому

      @@iggyantioch are you for Pädophile???!!!!

    • @loboman8029
      @loboman8029 9 місяців тому

      YOU = Excellent sermon exposing this dark, false religion.
      ME = If Catholicism is dark & false, why can not = any = Protestant take up my Challenge which I posted with = details = above and with the following heading : -
      @loboman8029
      1 month ago
      CHALLENGE = Can = any = Protestant, including the author of this video, give the answer to this most = basic = and fundamental

      Question = Why did Jesus incarnate as a Man and die on the Cross ??
      (( Note = a review of the following points is necessary before answer ))
      NOTE = If YOU are not able to answer this most basic and necessary question, then your = only = hope of salvation is to become a Catholic.
      God bless

  • @sean4922
    @sean4922 Рік тому +12

    God bless you brother, your teaching could have said it all in five minutes,as a former Roman Catholic i discovered the Catholic church has framed the bible around their teaching, tradition, rather than framing the church and teaching around the bible.

    • @ariston5433
      @ariston5433 Рік тому +6

      You would not have the Bible today if it weren’t for the Catholic Church. Do your research first. Also without the magesterium you could come up with a gazillion different ways to interpret the Bible resulting in a gazillion different denominations. So if the Bible is filtered through each individual experience so in essence if there is no magesterium then there is no truth in the Bible resulting in relativism. Which is a heresy plain and simple.

    • @peterzinya1
      @peterzinya1 Рік тому

      @@ariston5433 The magisterium...a bunch of homosexual pedophiles.

    • @bridgefin
      @bridgefin Рік тому

      The Catholic Church did not frame anything. Its members WROTE the New Testament.

    • @iggyantioch
      @iggyantioch 9 місяців тому

      Pray for your Churches.
      Glass house hero

  • @jediv3381
    @jediv3381 2 роки тому +2

    @Sola Fide Catholica *What m m doctrines you claimed Christians teach? List a few:*
    1
    2
    3

    • @rickcampanella4254
      @rickcampanella4254 5 місяців тому

      FATHER SON AND HOLY SPIRIT

    • @jediv3381
      @jediv3381 5 місяців тому +1

      @@rickcampanella4254 *What about it?*

  • @ddmdUp1
    @ddmdUp1 2 роки тому +28

    I"m not catholic, but really? "there's a picture of the pope to haunt you the rest of your life" five seconds later "we're not trying to bash roman Catholics"

    • @jesusfaith2232
      @jesusfaith2232 2 роки тому

      Don’t worry thou while the RCC dogmatically send Christians to hell!

    • @suzanneperez3747
      @suzanneperez3747 2 роки тому +7

      Yes! Thank you for recognizing that!

    • @sweetaznspice1
      @sweetaznspice1 Рік тому +1

      Exactly my sentiments. What a passive-aggressive tactic, and no it wasn't all that funny.

    • @edithhewson7208
      @edithhewson7208 Рік тому

      You maybe don't understand catholic doctrine for catholics the pope is vicor or Jesus in flesh

    • @peterzinya1
      @peterzinya1 Рік тому

      @@sweetaznspice1 Looking at that imposter of god gives me the willies. A man who calls himself the Holy Father is scary as f...k. You want to sugar coat the man of sin? I hope you follow him where hes going.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +3

    @Deborah Sheldon *Did you get that from Cinderella or pachamama? Where in the Bible says R Church was started by Christ? Or where in history says Scriptures was written by R Catholics? Or Nt R Catholic?*
    you said
    The Catholic Church was started by Jesus Christ, the Bible is Catholic also, especially The New Testament is the word of the Catholic, Christian, prophets.

    • @turin2197
      @turin2197 2 роки тому

      Faith Alone Where does the bible say it has to be in the bible alone to be true. Your bibliolatry is getting deep.

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +2

      @@turin2197 *Jesus, Apostles and disciples all turned to the Scriptures when they taught. They did not rely on traditions of Moses or Pharisees for doctrines. They quoted Written Word / Scriptures around 150 times in NT. So Sola Scriptura is true!*
      Mat 2:5 So they said to him, "In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet:
      Mat 4:4 But He answered and said, "It is written, 'MAN SHALL NOT LIVE BY BREAD ALONE, BUT BY EVERY WORD THAT PROCEEDS FROM THE MOUTH OF GOD.' "
      Mat 4:6 and said to Him, "If You are the Son of God, throw Yourself down. For it is written: 'HE SHALL GIVE HIS ANGELS CHARGE OVER YOU,' and, IN THEIR HANDS THEY SHALL BEAR YOU UP, LEST YOU DASH YOUR FOOT AGAINST A STONE.' "
      Mat 4:7 Jesus said to him, "It is written again, 'YOU SHALL NOT TEMPT THE LORD YOUR GOD.' "
      Mat 4:10 Then Jesus said to him, "Away with you, Satan! For it is written, 'YOU SHALL WORSHIP THE LORD YOUR GOD, AND HIM ONLY YOU SHALL SERVE.' "
      Mat 11:10 For this is he of whom it is written: 'BEHOLD, I SEND MY MESSENGER BEFORE YOUR FACE, WHO WILL PREPARE YOUR WAY BEFORE YOU.'
      Mat 21:13 And He said to them, "It is written, 'MY HOUSE SHALL BE CALLED A HOUSE OF PRAYER,' but you have made it a 'DEN OF THIEVES.'"
      Mat 26:24 The Son of Man indeed goes just as it is written of Him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been good for that man if he had not been born."
      Mat 26:31 Then Jesus said to them, "All of you will be made to stumble because of Me this night, for it is written: 'I WILL STRIKE THE SHEPHERD, AND THE SHEEP OF THE FLOCK WILL BE SCATTERED.'
      Mat 27:37 And they put up over His head the accusation written against Him: THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS.
      Mar 1:2 As it is written in the Prophets: "BEHOLD, I SEND MY MESSENGER BEFORE YOUR FACE, WHO WILL PREPARE YOUR WAY BEFORE YOU."
      Mar 7:6 He answered and said to them, "Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written: 'THIS PEOPLE HONORS ME WITH THEIR LIPS, BUT THEIR HEART IS FAR FROM ME.

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +2

      @@turin2197 *Even nt Church of the Bible (Apostles and elders) appealed to the Word of God for determination of doctrines in Acts 15. The council did not decide based on their own words; neither on traditions of Pharisees or Moses. They based their decisions on "WHAT GOD SAID". Yes they met at Jerusalem council Acts 15 to discuss. But they appeal to what God says. Using God's word to decide what to do!*
      *Bible says decision was made by Apostles and elders. Not single leader Peter!! (let alone pope). Acts 15:6, 16:4.*
      Act 15:6 Now the apostles and elders came together to consider this matter.
      Act 16:4 And as they went through the cities, they delivered to them the decrees to keep, which were determined by the apostles and elders at Jerusalem.
      *1. Peter appealed using what God told him:*
      to him rgd his vision of the clean and unclean animals in Acts 10..
      That gentiles are accepted.
      Act 10:13 And a voice came to him, "Rise, Peter; kill and eat."
      Act 10:14 But Peter said, "Not so, Lord! For I have never eaten anything common or unclean."
      Act 10:15 And a voice spoke to him again the second time, "What God has cleansed you must not call common."
      Act 15:7 And when there had been much dispute, Peter rose up and said to them: "Men and brethren, you know that a good while ago God chose among us, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe.
      *2. James appealed using the Word of God:*
      Act 15:13 And after they had become silent, James answered, saying, "Men and brethren, listen to me:
      Act 15:14 Simon has declared how God at the first visited the Gentiles to take out of them a people for His name.
      Act 15:15 And with this the words of the prophets agree, just as it is written:
      Act 15:16 'AFTER THIS I WILL RETURN AND WILL REBUILD THE TABERNACLE OF DAVID, WHICH HAS FALLEN DOWN; I WILL REBUILD ITS RUINS, AND I WILL SET IT UP;
      Act 15:17 SO THAT THE REST OF MANKIND MAY SEEK THE LORD, EVEN ALL THE GENTILES WHO ARE CALLED BY MY NAME, SAYS THE LORD WHO DOES ALL THESE THINGS.'
      Act 15:18 "Known to God from eternity are all His works.
      Act 15:19 Therefore I judge that we should not trouble those from among the Gentiles who are turning to God,
      *3. Apostles Barnabas and Paul appealed to the “works of GOD done on the Gentiles”.*
      Act 15:12 Then all the multitude kept silent and listened to Barnabas and Paul declaring how many miracles and wonders God had worked through them among the Gentiles.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +4

    ​ @Michael *Too bad Bible does not teach sacrificing Jesus back to God. Where did you get that? Tales?*
    *What's there to interpret when Bible says nothing about it? R church made it up?*
    you said
    ...Thanks for YOUR interpretation of scripture; however I will stick with the RCC's

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +2

    ​ @Turin21 *If you claim otherwise, pls cite me what traditions of Pharisees or Moses did Jesus and Apostles appealed to as support for doctrines:*
    1
    2
    3
    *You cant.*

  • @solafide9533
    @solafide9533 2 роки тому +3

    ​ @The Mysterious Cynthia X *Too bad. Those were just local councils with local canons affecting their own local communities. No canon was fixed for the whole of Christendom at all. They merely cited the 27 books canon.*
    *Cite me one ecumenical council with bishops of all churches that fixed the canon for all Christianity? Just one? You cant?*
    1
    2
    3
    you said
    The bible took a long time to write and compile. (Old testament was compiled and new Testament was written during the course of SEVERAL Catholic councils and the date I gave was the final stage)

    • @jesusfaith2232
      @jesusfaith2232 2 роки тому +1

      Geez …the snakes !

    • @solafide9533
      @solafide9533 2 роки тому +1

      @@jesusfaith2232 *Lol*

    • @solafide9533
      @solafide9533 2 роки тому +1

      @@jesusfaith2232 *This is one of the favourite claims of R Church - "R Church fixed the canon". They claimed since they fix it, they have all authority. Lolol. Sounds like some bullies taking over people's house, then claim its theirs then say they have all authority.*

    • @jesusfaith2232
      @jesusfaith2232 2 роки тому +1

      @@solafide9533 They claim that to try and prove all their teachings are 100% correct, they know it’s not!

    • @solafide9533
      @solafide9533 2 роки тому +1

      @@jesusfaith2232 *Catholicism has too many m m doctrines. It's hard to hide.*

  • @jediv3381
    @jediv3381 2 роки тому +4

    ​ @Michael Speyrer *You claimed to have read the Bible and have a Masters but cannot answer?*
    *nt church of the Apostles did not have such practices. Answer me: did apostles make and bow down to statues? Did Apostles ask passed on saints to pray for them? Or sprinkle "holy" water on believers? Or wore fishhead hat and costumes? Or cite hocus pocus when they serve the communion? They merely broke bread and passed around the table. Did they demand believers to kneel in front of them to serve them communion? Or did Peter ask believers to kiss his hands and feet? Or did Apostles venerate statues, bones or relics?*

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      The apostles are the saints of the early Church.

    • @jediv9492
      @jediv9492 2 роки тому +1

      ​ @Michael *Bible says all believers are saints. Dont you ever read the Bible cerebrumwashed R Catholic?*
      you said
      The apostles ARE the saints........our cloud of witnesses........see Hebrews 12: 1.

    • @jediv9492
      @jediv9492 2 роки тому +1

      ​ @Michael *I bet you dont even know there is no such thing as canonised R church saints in the Bible. In all the usages of the word "saint"in the Bible, saints always refer to general believers. Not some special class of r church believers who are so called "holy" or have had some "achievements"?*
      *Paul cant be talking about ministering to dead saints can he>?*
      Rom_15:25 But now I am going to Jerusalem to minister to the saints.
      Rom_15:26 For it pleased those from Macedonia and Achaia to make a certain contribution for the poor among the saints who are in Jerusalem.
      Rom_15:31 that I may be delivered from those in Judea who do not believe, and that my service for Jerusalem may be acceptable to the saints,
      There you go:
      More verses.
      Rom_1:7 To all who are in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.
      Rom_8:27 Now He who searches the hearts knows what the mind of the Spirit is, because He makes intercession for the saints according to the will of God.
      Rom_12:13 distributing to the needs of the saints, given to hospitality.
      Rom_16:2 that you may receive her in the Lord in a manner worthy of the saints, and assist her in whatever business she has need of you; for indeed she has been a helper of many and of myself also.
      Rom_16:15 Greet Philologus and Julia, Nereus and his sister, and Olympas, and all the saints who are with them.
      1Co_1:2 To the church of God which is at Corinth, to those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all who in every place call on the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both theirs and ours:
      1Co_6:1 Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?
      1Co_6:2 Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world will be judged by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters?
      1Co_14:33 For God is not the author of confusion but of peace, as in all the churches of the saints.
      1Co_16:1 Now concerning the collection for the saints, as I have given orders to the churches of Galatia, so you must do also:
      1Co_16:15 I urge you, brethren-you know the household of Stephanas, that it is the firstfruits of Achaia, and that they have devoted themselves to the ministry of the saints-
      2Co_1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, and Timothy our brother, To the church of God which is at Corinth, with all the saints who are in all Achaia:
      2Co_8:4 imploring us with much urgency that we would receive the gift and the fellowship of the ministering to the saints.
      2Co_9:1 Now concerning the ministering to the saints, it is superfluous for me to write to you;
      2Co_9:12 For the administration of this service not only supplies the needs of the saints, but also is abounding through many thanksgivings to God,
      2Co_13:13 All the saints greet you.
      Eph_1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, To the saints who are in Ephesus, and faithful in Christ Jesus:
      Eph_1:15 Therefore I also, after I heard of your faith in the Lord Jesus and your love for all the saints,
      Eph_1:18 the eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that you may know what is the hope of His calling, what are the riches of the glory of His inheritance in the saints,
      Eph_2:19 Now, therefore, you are no longer strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God,

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      @@jediv9492......Ok, St. Je diV

    • @jediv9492
      @jediv9492 2 роки тому +2

      ​ @Michael *You dont even know believers are called saints in the Bible. Dont you ever read the Bible?*

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +5

    @Tom Rodgers *Why read that when it contradicts the Scriptures in every possible ways? Why not read the Bible itself?*
    you said
    Regards to predestination I would have go in detail the meaning. Read the Caticisum.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +2

    ​ @Turin21 *TOo bad. R Church had already deviated from the Earliest Church Fathers - Jesus, APostles and nt church of the Bible. Nt church do not teach all the m m doctrines of R Church. You are wrong once again.*
    1. Purgatory 2. Confessing to priests 3. Office of pope or priests4. Pope being the vicar (representation of Christ, usurping the authority of God)5. Praying to Mary, saints6. Penance 7. Worshipping idols/images, placing idols images in church8. Church in the Bible is not building, but the body of believers9. Sacrament was never the real body and blood of Christ as RC church claimed (Real meaning real blood and body, bcos it didnt really turned "bloody" did it?)10. Salvation by (works (7sacraments) +faith) was never in the Bible. Real salvation is by grace through faith as seen in Bible. 11. Rosary, set repetitive prayers, hail Mary 10000 times12. Mass - putting Christ on the altar again and again13. Mary as queen of heaven 14. Mary as Ark of the new covenant. 15. Mary as the mother of heavenly Jesus thus Mary exist before Christ16. Immersion of infant for baptism17. Holy water18. Celibacy of priests (no office of priests in NT anyway, only priesthood of all believers)19. Kissing of statues20. Changing of 10 commandments. COmmandment of graven image removed by Catholic CHurch in Catholic Catechism. Splitting of another commandment into 2 commandments. 21. Catholic church changed Bible verse Gen 3:15 (And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise His heel."). 'He' and 'His' referring to Christ.
    Catholics changed it to (Gen 3:15 And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; She shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise Her heel.") 'She' and 'Her' refers to Mary. 22. Catholic Church use Rev 12 to refer to Mary as 'queen of heaven', when Rev 12:6 clearly refers to Israel escaping the Great Tribulation. Mary cannot be alive to escape the Great Tribulation. 23. Catholic Church refers to Mary as 'Queen of heaven', but 'Queen of Mary' in the Bible is a demonic entity Astoreth or Ishtar, the female deity partner of Baal. 5 verses in Jeremiah as proof.24. Catholic church refers to Mary as the Mediatress, Co redemptress, helper of Christ, firstborn of all creation ..
    Mary cannot be the mediatress. Jesus is the one and only Mediator between God and man. Only Jesus redeems. Only the Holy Spirit is the Helper sent by Jesus. Only Jesus is the firstborn of all creation. 25. Roman Catholicism has “saints” one can pray to in order to gain a particular blessing. For example, Saint Gianna Beretta Molla is the patron saint of fertility. Francis of Assisi is the patron saint of animals. There are multiple patron saints of healing and comfort.
    Nowhere is even a hint of this taught in Scripture. Just as the Roman pantheon of gods had a god of love, a god of peace, a god of war, a god of strength, a god of wisdom, etc., so the Catholic Church has a saint who is “in charge” over each of these and many other categories. Many Roman cities had a god specific to the city, and the Catholic Church provided “patron saints” for cities as well.26. Mary is called the gate of heaven? Mary has keys to paradise?
    Here are roman pagan teachers saying their man made goddess is their savior. None of these quotes have been denounced, on the contrary they are cited.
    "Open to us, O Mary, the gate of Paradise, since you have its keys! " St. Ambrose
    "God has entrusted the keys and treasures of Heaven to Mary." St. Thomas Aquinas
    "No one can enter into Heaven except through Mary, as entering through a gate. " St. Bonaventure
    "Mary is called "The Gate of Heaven" because no one can enter Heaven but through her means." St. Alphonsus Maria Liguori
    Papal infallibility
    Immaculate Mary
    Assumption of Mary
    Perpetual Virgin
    Mary as Mother of God,
    co mediatrix,
    co redemptrix,
    new ark of covenant,
    Pope as vicar,
    Holy Water,
    papacy,
    peter as first pope,
    papal succession,
    apostolic succession,
    indulgences,
    7 sacraments,
    rosary
    veneration of saints and statues
    celibacy of priesthood
    canonization of saints
    limbo
    you said
    Did they have the Eucharist?
    What did they believe about apostolic succession, Mary the Mother of God, baptismal regeneration, Tradition, Faith and works together vs Faith Alone, the Deuterocanon among other things. Your point is easy to say for an anti-Catholic but hard to prove. Did your "churches believe in bible alone? Proof? I could go on and on but you get the idea. Prove it! Since you can't possibly prove it then forget the nonsense you spew so easily and think before you post. You indeed try to talk about Catholic Councils and saints like Athanasius but you really know nothing about Catholicism. It's just too difficult for you to understand or for anyone who has not been given the GIFT of faith.

  • @911theanonymous
    @911theanonymous 3 роки тому +19

    Educate, educate and then educate yourselves! The Catholic Church is the fullness of the faith with all its beauty. 🙏🏻

    • @alanshoebridge9987
      @alanshoebridge9987 3 роки тому +4

      Most all of their practices and doctrines are least umbilical, If not satanic.

    • @911theanonymous
      @911theanonymous 3 роки тому +1

      @@alanshoebridge9987 Be specific.

    • @911theanonymous
      @911theanonymous 3 роки тому +3

      @RAANA FORGAH We don’t pray to saints, we ask for their intercession, just as you would ask anyone to pray for you. Sounds like you don’t believe we have souls, that when we die, that’s it. We’re dead. If we have no souls then there’s no need to pray. ?

    • @911theanonymous
      @911theanonymous 3 роки тому +2

      @RAANA FORGAH I respect what you believe but that’s not what we believe. We believe anyone can pray for us, alive or dead. Of course, no one goes to the Father but through Jesus. God bless.

    • @911theanonymous
      @911theanonymous 3 роки тому +2

      @RAANA FORGAH Thank you so much for your sweet reply. I feel your concern for me and it touches me. Raana, we are the church that Christ founded and there was no Bible back then (other than the Old Testament). It had not been written yet so the apostles and their successors had to hand down the traditions and teachings that Jesus gave them. In the Catholic Church the Bible is not the only Pilar of truth. It is tradition first along with the Bible. (Timothy 3 14-16). 2 Thessalonians 2 13-15 Teaches to hold on to the traditions that were taught them. We believe that everyone who goes to heaven is a saint but we also have canonized saints. It is a grueling process, closely scrutinized in order to become a Canonized Saint. A Saint cannot perform a miracle but only God. We ask them to pray for us because they see the face of the Trinity. We, in no way, think that it’s the Saint who performs the miracle or gives us the grace we are seeking but only God. We especially ask for Our Lady’s intercession because She is His Mother, His greatest masterpiece of creation and He may be inclined to answer a prayer the way she is asking because He loves her so. Thank you for your kindness towards me. God bless!

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +4

    ​ @Andrew Drew *Luk 22 describes all the 12 Apostles there eating the Passover with Jesus. Judas ate the blessed bread too.*
    Luk 22:14 When the hour had come, He sat down, and *the twelve apostles with Him.*
    Luk 22:15 Then He said to them, "With fervent desire I have desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer;
    Luk 22:16 for I say to you, I will no longer eat of it until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God."
    Luk 22:17 *Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, "Take this and divide it among yourselves;*
    Luk 22:18 for I say to you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes."
    Luk 22:19 *And He took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, "This is My body which is given for you; do this in remembrance of Me."*
    Luk 22:20 Likewise He also took the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is shed for you.
    Luk 22:21 *But behold, the hand of My betrayer is with Me on the table.*
    Luk 22:22 And truly the Son of Man goes as it has been determined, but woe to that man by whom He is betrayed!"
    Luk 22:23 Then they began to question among themselves, which of them it was who would do this thing.
    you said
    Jesus gives Judas a morsel dipped which the Lord had not blessed this in called consecration dude .
    After Judas left notice Jesus breaks bread and blesses it as with the wine.

    • @BdDaBOMB
      @BdDaBOMB 2 роки тому

      also Yahusha is the son of man's name who came in the name of the father YAHUAH our ALAHIM to deliver us all if we believe and obey the Sabbath

    • @BdDaBOMB
      @BdDaBOMB 2 роки тому

      I do wonder if Judas was working for & with Peter?

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

      @@BdDaBOMB *You sound like you are from Lucy. Try harder!*

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +2

      @@BdDaBOMB *Questions for SDA members:*
      *1. Where in the BIBLE says “Jesus = Michael the Archangel”?*
      *2. Where in the BIBLE says “Satan bore the sins of believers”?*
      *3. Where in NT says Gentile Christians need to keep the 7th Day Sabbath?*
      *4. Where in the BIBLE says Gentile Christians are SAVED BY WORKS?*
      *5. Why keep only 1 commandment? Why not all 613 mosaic laws?*
      *6. Why SDA members still drive, cook and switch on lights in church? Since fire is not allowed. Ignition has fire/sparks too. Jews don’t cook, switch on light on sabbath. Lolol*
      *7. True sabbath keeping Jews are put to death if they failed to keep the sabbath. Why SDA members don’t try?*

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +2

      @@BdDaBOMB *8. Due to time zone. Jewish sabbath day could be our Sunday or Friday. Lol. So you think you are keeping Saturday sabbath is meaningless.*
      Kingdom of God is not about which day. It’s about inner qualities like righteousness peace and joy.
      Rom 14:17 for the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit.
      *9. SDA members claimed Sabbath is a commandment for all Man. But please explain why Adam, Eve, Noah, Abraham did not keep Sabbath as a commandment?*
      *10. Bible says Sabbath keeping was only a commandment for Israelites in the Old Covenant. Exo **31:16**. Are SDA members Jews or in the Old Covenant?*
      Exo 31:16 Therefore the children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath, to observe the Sabbath throughout their generations as a perpetual covenant.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

    ​ @Turin21 *You cannot refute Scripture Alone practised by Jesus APostles and nt church? Even early writings mentioned Scripture Alone. Bible speaks of it too. Are you denying all the Scriptures say? Are you denying all the Jesus and apostles say?*
    *Jesus and apostles all appealed to Scriptures only as support for doctrines. They did that 150 times in nt alone. They did not appeal to traditions of Pharisees and Moses as doctrines. NT church of the Bible also appealed to “what God says” and “what God said” as support for doctrines at Jerusalem Council. Acts 15. Not traditions. Isn’t that good enough proof Christians should only take doctrines from Scriptures only?*
    Mat 2:5 So they said to him, "In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet:
    Mat 4:4 But He answered and said, "It is written, 'MAN SHALL NOT LIVE BY BREAD ALONE, BUT BY EVERY WORD THAT PROCEEDS FROM THE MOUTH OF GOD.' "
    Mat 4:6 and said to Him, "If You are the Son of God, throw Yourself down. For it is written: 'HE SHALL GIVE HIS ANGELS CHARGE OVER YOU,' and, IN THEIR HANDS THEY SHALL BEAR YOU UP, LEST YOU DASH YOUR FOOT AGAINST A STONE.' "
    Mat 4:7 Jesus said to him, "It is written again, 'YOU SHALL NOT TEMPT THE LORD YOUR GOD.' "
    Mat 4:10 Then Jesus said to him, "Away with you, Satan! For it is written, 'YOU SHALL WORSHIP THE LORD YOUR GOD, AND HIM ONLY YOU SHALL SERVE.' "
    Mat 11:10 For this is he of whom it is written: 'BEHOLD, I SEND MY MESSENGER BEFORE YOUR FACE, WHO WILL PREPARE YOUR WAY BEFORE YOU.'
    Mat 21:13 And He said to them, "It is written, 'MY HOUSE SHALL BE CALLED A HOUSE OF PRAYER,' but you have made it a 'DEN OF THIEVES.'"
    Mat 26:24 The Son of Man indeed goes just as it is written of Him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been good for that man if he had not been born."
    Mat 26:31 Then Jesus said to them, "All of you will be made to stumble because of Me this night, for it is written: 'I WILL STRIKE THE SHEPHERD, AND THE SHEEP OF THE FLOCK WILL BE SCATTERED.'
    Mat 27:37 And they put up over His head the accusation written against Him: THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS.
    *Even nt Church of the Bible (Apostles and elders) appealed to the Word of God for determination of doctrines in Acts 15. The council did not decide based on their own words; neither on traditions of Pharisees or Moses. They based their decisions on "WHAT GOD SAID". Yes they met at Jerusalem council Acts 15 to discuss. But they appeal to what God says. Using God's word to decide what to do!*
    *Bible says decision was made by Apostles and elders. Not single leader Peter!! (let alone pope). Acts 15:6, 16:4.*
    Act 15:6 Now the apostles and elders came together to consider this matter.
    Act 16:4 And as they went through the cities, they delivered to them the decrees to keep, which were determined by the apostles and elders at Jerusalem.
    *1. Peter appealed using what God told him:*
    to him rgd his vision of the clean and unclean animals in Acts 10..
    That gentiles are accepted.
    Act 10:13 And a voice came to him, "Rise, Peter; kill and eat."
    Act 10:14 But Peter said, "Not so, Lord! For I have never eaten anything common or unclean."
    Act 10:15 And a voice spoke to him again the second time, "What God has cleansed you must not call common."
    Act 15:7 And when there had been much dispute, Peter rose up and said to them: "Men and brethren, you know that a good while ago God chose among us, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe.
    *2. James appealed using the Word of God:*
    Act 15:13 And after they had become silent, James answered, saying, "Men and brethren, listen to me:
    Act 15:14 Simon has declared how God at the first visited the Gentiles to take out of them a people for His name.
    Act 15:15 And with this the words of the prophets agree, just as it is written:
    Act 15:16 'AFTER THIS I WILL RETURN AND WILL REBUILD THE TABERNACLE OF DAVID, WHICH HAS FALLEN DOWN; I WILL REBUILD ITS RUINS, AND I WILL SET IT UP;
    Act 15:17 SO THAT THE REST OF MANKIND MAY SEEK THE LORD, EVEN ALL THE GENTILES WHO ARE CALLED BY MY NAME, SAYS THE LORD WHO DOES ALL THESE THINGS.'
    Act 15:18 "Known to God from eternity are all His works.
    Act 15:19 Therefore I judge that we should not trouble those from among the Gentiles who are turning to God,
    *3. Apostles Barnabas and Paul appealed to the “works of GOD done on the Gentiles”.*
    Act 15:12 Then all the multitude kept silent and listened to Barnabas and Paul declaring how many miracles and wonders God had worked through them among the Gentiles.
    you said
    you said "Jesus APostles and nt church all appealed to Scripture alone for doctrines." Fair enough. Now show me the scriptures that Jesus, the apostles and NT church appealed to in order to support Sola Scriptura or Scripture ALONE.

  • @GamingxKnight
    @GamingxKnight 2 роки тому +8

    Yeah this is a joke. Poorly represents the Catholic Church's teachings, nit-picks certain aspects of Catholic teaching to make a poor argument, and starts his 'preaching' (but let's be honest, it's him having a hatred for the Catholic Church) by attacking the Pope saying that the image will 'haunt them for the rest of your life'. Sounds real charitable and loving, wouldn't you say? Hey, this guy actually willing to have a 'debate' or an actual sit down with a Catholic theologian and actually get into the meat of the topic? Most likely not.

    • @thegrizzly11
      @thegrizzly11 2 роки тому +2

      He just preach the truth!

    • @GamingxKnight
      @GamingxKnight 2 роки тому

      @@thegrizzly11 You mean by misrepresenting Catholic teaching and lying about what Catholics actually believe? Sure, that's preaching the 'truth' now isn't it? Love how Protestants think they know Catholic teaching when all they do is learn basic Catholic teaching that first graders learn and manipulate what they know to smear Catholics. Very Christian and loving. Clearly what Christ called us to do.

  • @sherrilcarss6091
    @sherrilcarss6091 2 роки тому +9

    Hebrews 10:7 Then said I Lol I come in the volume of the Book 📖 it is written of me to do thy will O God ✝️🙏Praise the Lord 🙌

    • @BdDaBOMB
      @BdDaBOMB 2 роки тому +1

      also Yahusha is the son of man's name who came in the name of the father YAHUAH our ALAHIM to deliver us all if we believe and obey the Sabbath

  • @GR65330
    @GR65330 2 роки тому +21

    Brother, you claim that the Holy Spirit will guide the "spiritual man" to all truth. Since the non-Catholic "spiritual men" cannot agree on the understanding of the scriptures, then which "spiritual man" knows the absolute, doctrinal truth?
    In Catholic teaching, scripture is not relegated to the background but stands as one of the three pillars of our faith, along with Holy Tradition and the Magisterium. The Church in no way has nullified sacred scripture, as the scriptures are from God and must be believed.
    Where did you get the idea that the Catholic Church teaches that "John's gospel and not the whole bible is sufficient"? The Church has never taught this as all scripture is from God and must be believed. Brother, if you are going to tell people what Catholics believe, at least get it right!
    Paul spoke of two traditions that should be observed: the written tradition, which is the scriptures and the oral traditions, but yet you only recognize the written tradition. Why don't you observe the oral tradition? The tradition of the Church are that of the apostles and did not come after the apostles.
    Your idea of apostolic succession is somewhat lacking. It does not mean that there are still apostles but only that their authority has been passed on to their successors in the same way that Mathias received this authority in Acts 1 by succeeding Judas' see.
    Those things that you listed that you claim are in direct opposition to the scriptures is a false statement as we can find them in the bible.
    I agree that God is not the author of confusion but yet there are thousands of sola scriptura churches that teach differing doctrine. So which of these 'bible alone' churches teach the absolute, apostolic doctrinal truth?

    • @wandasmith9180
      @wandasmith9180 2 роки тому +2

      Well said ❤️

    • @GR65330
      @GR65330 2 роки тому +3

      @@amendz316 Yeah... I would leave the Catholic Church as well, if I understood the Church as you do. But fortunately, I understand the Church as she is revealed scripturally, doctrinally and historically.
      The Blessed Mother leads us to her Son and she can intercede on our behalf as defined by the doctrinal teaching of the Communion of the Saints.
      Idols, are non-existent in the Catholic Church but statues and imagery are found throughout the Church. Imagery from the earliest Christians (1-3 centuries) are found in the Catacombs. The first century Christians didn't have a problem with Christian imagery or relics as these are found throughout the catacombs. It is only idolatry if you worship these images and statues, which we do not. The issue of icons was settled almost 2000 years ago.
      So brother, what man-made church did you join after leaving the Catholic Church?

    • @GR65330
      @GR65330 2 роки тому +2

      @@amendz316 You have a problem... Your "Church of Christ" organization wasn't around until the 19th century, meaning that your local church or congregation is not apostolic in origin.
      So, why do you follow the teachings of men?

    • @GR65330
      @GR65330 2 роки тому +1

      @@amendz316 Brother, you need a lesson in Church history as it has always been the Catholic Church in unity with the Petrine Primacy. I don't know where or from whom you got your biblical understanding or history from, but you did not learn the truth. You have been deceived brother.

    • @pseudotonal
      @pseudotonal 2 роки тому +4

      One of your popes said that Mary was without original sin. But Mary called God her savior. The R.C. is so steeped in heresy that it is a hopeless mess and needs to be done away with. You had your chance to reform and instead fought it and added even more heresies. There are some R.C. people that are Christians, but the blasphemy of the church hinders them. This is a cult, not a church.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

    ​ @burble74 *Of course Bible teaches Faith Alone doctrine (which is Salvation Not By Works). Salvation Not By Works is in two third of New Testament. Early writings also spoke of Salvation Not By Works. Augustine and Ambrose also translated Romans 3:28 as Faith Alone. Similarly many Old Catholic Bibles in 1400s.*
    Two third of NT says Salvation Not By Works. Luke 23:43 - the thief at the Cross believed in Jesus and he was in Paradise thereafter. NOT WORKS! John 1:29 - Christ the Lamb of GOD who takes away the sins of the world ... (NOT OUR WORKS) John 3:16 - saved by believing in Jesus. NOT WORKS! Acts 16:30-31 - saved by believing in Jesus. NOT WORKS! Rom 4. Vs 1-2 - justified NOT BY WORKS! Vs 3 - Abraham believed (FAITH) and was accounted as RIGHTEOUSNESS. Vs 4 - WORKS are debts . Vs 5 - he who DOES NOT WORK is JUSTIFIED . Vs 5 - God justifies the ungodly, Vs 5 - FAITH was accounted as RIGHTEOUSNESS. Vs 6 - Blessedness Apart from WORKS! Imputation of RIGHTEOUSNESS by FAITH. Vs 8 - imputation of RIGHTEOUSNESS apart from WORKS! Vs 9-10 - Abraham was made RIGHTEOUS BY FAITH BEFORE ANY WORKS! Vs 9-10 - Abraham received seal of RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE FAITH by imputation. NOT WORKS! Vs 11 - Promise to Abraham was through RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE FAITH. Vs 14-15 - Faith is made void by works of the law, works of the Law brings Wrath, Not salvation. Vs 22 - Abraham believed (FAITH) and was accounted as RIGHTEOUSNESS . Vs 22 - RIGHTEOUSNESS imputed on those who believed. Not those who WORKS! Rom 11:6 - IF IT IS WORKS, IT’S NO LONGER GRACE . 2 Cor 5:21 - GOD made Jesus who knew no sin to become sin for us, that we might become the RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD. Gal 2:16 - not justified by WORKS OF THE LAW, BUT BY FAITH IN JESUS. BY WORKS OF THE LAW, NO MAN IS JUSTIFIED! Gal 2:21 - if RIGHTEOUSNESS comes through the law, then Christ died in vain. Gal 3:1-5 - Paul said Christians who started by faith, why end up following WORKS of law (not only Mosaic laws)? Are you made perfect by flesh (WORKS)? Gal 3:1-5 - Did God do miracles by your faith believing or by your WORKS of law? Eph 2:8-9 - saved by grace through faith NOT BY WORKS. Eph 2: 8-9 - salvation is a GIFT. NOT WORKS! 2 Tim 1:9 - saved NOT according to our WORKS. Titus 3:5 - saved NOT BY WORKS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS. 1 Pet 2:24 - Christ (the Lamb of GOD) bore our sins … (NOT OUR WORKS).
    you said
    Scripture does not teach faith alone

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +3

    ​ @CSB Studios *Where in the Bible teaches Penance - Work to atone of sins? Pls answer. You are covering up this self made doctrine of R church?*

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      See Luke 19: 1-10.

    • @browncony3897
      @browncony3897 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@Michael-nb4ng *You see how you love misquoting Scriptures? This is ot restitution. Not penance. Which part says Z atoned for his own sins? Or say Hail Mary 10000 times?*
      you said
      See Luke 19: 1-10.

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      @@browncony3897............Zaccheus gave alms and paid back X4 that he had cheated; and Jesus declared ' salvation.'

    • @browncony3897
      @browncony3897 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@Michael-nb4ng *What has OT restitution to do with your claims of Penance in New Covenant? Zacchaeus was under Mosaic Law. Are you under Mosaic Law?*
      *Restitution is restoring goods. Penance is atonement for sins. Where in the Bible teach penance?*
      Exo 22:3 If the sun has risen on him, there shall be guilt for his bloodshed. He should make full restitution; if he has nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft.
      Exo 22:5 "If a man causes a field or vineyard to be grazed, and lets loose his animal, and it feeds in another man's field, he shall make restitution from the best of his own field and the best of his own vineyard.
      Exo 22:6 "If fire breaks out and catches in thorns, so that stacked grain, standing grain, or the field is consumed, he who kindled the fire shall surely make restitution.
      Exo 22:12 But if, in fact, it is stolen from him, he shall make restitution to the owner of it.
      Lev 5:16 And he shall make restitution for the harm that he has done in regard to the holy thing, and shall add one-fifth to it and give it to the priest. So the priest shall make atonement for him with the ram of the trespass offering, and it shall be forgiven him.
      Num 5:7 then he shall confess the sin which he has committed. He shall make restitution for his trespass in full, plus one-fifth of it, and give it to the one he has wronged.
      Num 5:8 But if the man has no relative to whom restitution may be made for the wrong, the restitution for the wrong must go to the LORD for the priest, in addition to the ram of the atonement with which atonement is made for him.
      you said
      ..........Zaccheus gave alms and paid back X4 that he had cheated; and Jesus declared ' salvation.'

    • @browncony3897
      @browncony3897 2 роки тому +1

      ​ @Michael *You see how you love misquoting Scriptures? This is ot restitution. Not penance. Which part says Z atoned for his own sins? Or say Hail Mary 10000 times?*
      you said
      See Luke 19: 1-10.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +3

    ​ @CSB Studios *DRB is a corrupted Bible that changes all the words "repentance" in NT into "penance". Penance is works. Repentance is change of heart.*
    45 Verses Found, 48 Matches
    Mat 3:2 And saying: Do penance: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
    Mat 3:8 Bring forth therefore fruit worthy of penance.
    Mat 3:11 I indeed baptize you in water unto penance, but he that shall come after me, is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you in the Holy Ghost and fire.
    Mat 4:17 From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say: Do penance, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
    Mat 11:20 Then began he to upbraid the cities wherein were done the most of his miracles, for that they had not done penance.
    Mat 11:21 Woe thee, Corozain, woe to thee, Bethsaida: for if in Tyre and Sidon had been wrought the miracles that have been wrought in you, they had long ago done penance in sackcloth and ashes.
    Mat 12:41 The men of Ninive shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they did penance at the preaching of Jonas. And behold a greater than Jonas here.
    Mar 1:4 John was in the desert, baptizing and preaching the baptism of penance, unto remission of sins.
    Mar 6:12 And going forth they preached men should do penance:
    Luk 3:3 And he came into all the country about the Jordan, preaching the baptism of penance for the remission of sins.
    Luk 3:8 Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of penance: and do not begin to say, We have Abraham for our father. For I say unto you that God is able of these stones, to raise up children to Abraham.
    Luk 5:32 I came not to call the just, but sinners to penance.
    Luk 10:13 Woe to thee, Corozain! Woe to thee, Bethsaida! For if in Tyre and Sidon had been wrought the mighty works that have been wrought in you, they would have done penance long ago, sitting in sackcloth and ashes.
    Luk 11:32 The men of Ninive shall rise in the judgment with this generation and shall condemn it; Because they did penance at the preaching of Jonas. And behold more than Jonas here.
    Luk 13:3 No, I say to you: but unless you shall do penance, you shall all likewise perish.
    Luk 13:5 No, I say to you: but except you do penance, you shall all likewise perish.
    Luk 15:7 I say to you that even so there shall be joy in heaven upon one sinner that doth penance, more than upon ninety-nine just who need not penance.
    Luk 15:10 So I say to you, there shall be joy before the angels of God upon one sinner doing penance.
    Luk 16:30 But he said: No, father Abraham: but if one went to them from the dead, they will do penance.
    Luk 17:3 Take heed to yourselves. If thy brother sin against thee, reprove him: and if he do penance, forgive him.
    Luk 24:47 And that penance and remission of sins should be preached in his name, unto all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
    Act 2:38 But Peter said to them: Do penance: and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of your sins. And you shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
    Act 8:22 Do penance therefore for this thy wickedness: and pray to God, that perhaps this thought of thy heart may be forgiven thee.
    Act 13:24 John first preaching, before his coming, the baptism of penance to all the people of Israel.
    Act 17:30 And God indeed having winked at the times of this ignorance, now declareth unto men that all should every where do penance.
    Act 19:4 Then Paul said: John baptized the people with the baptism of penance saying: That they should believe in him, who was to come after him, that is to say, in Jesus.
    Act 20:21 Testifying both to Jews and Gentiles penance towards God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ.
    Act 26:20 But to them first that are at Damascus and at Jerusalem, and unto all the country of Judea, and to the Gentiles did I preach, that they should do penance and turn to God, doing works worthy of penance.
    Rom 2:4 Or despisest thou the riches of his goodness and patience and longsuffering? Knowest thou not that the benignity of God leadeth thee to penance?
    2Co 7:9 Now I am glad: not because you were made sorrowful, but because you were made sorrowful unto penance. For you were made sorrowful according to God, that you might suffer damage by us in nothing.
    2Co 7:10 For the sorrow that is according to God worketh penance, steadfast unto salvation: but the sorrow of the world worketh death.
    2Co 12:21 Lest again, when I come, God humble me among you: and I mourn many of them that sinned before and have not done penance for the uncleanness and fornication and lasciviousness that they have committed.
    Heb 6:1 Wherefore, leaving the word of the beginning of Christ, let us go on to things more perfect: not laying again the foundation of penance from dead works and of faith towards God,
    Heb 6:6 And are fallen away: to be renewed again to penance, crucifying again to themselves the Son of God and making him a mockery.
    2Pe 3:9 The Lord delayeth not his promise, as some imagine, but dealeth patiently for your sake, not willing that any should perish, but that all should return to penance,
    Rev 2:5 Be mindful therefore from whence thou art fallen: and do penance and do the first works. Or else I come to thee and will move thy candlestick out of its place, except thou do penance.
    Rev 2:16 In like manner do penance. If not, I will come to thee quickly and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth.
    Rev 2:21 And I gave her a time that she might do penance: and she will not repent of her fornication.
    Rev 2:22 Behold, I will cast her into a bed: and they that commit adultery with her shall be in very great tribulation, except they do penance from their deeds,
    Rev 3:3 Have in mind therefore in what manner thou hast received and heard: and observe and do penance: If then thou shalt not watch, I will come to thee as a thief: and thou shalt not know at what hour I will come to thee.
    Rev 3:19 Such as I love, I rebuke and chastise. Be zealous therefore and do penance.
    Rev 9:20 And the rest of the men, who were not slain by these plagues, did not do penance from the works of their hands, that they should not adore devils and idols of gold and silver and brass and stone and wood, which neither can see nor hear nor walk:
    Rev 9:21 Neither did they penance from their murders nor from their sorceries nor from their fornication nor from their thefts.
    Rev 16:9 And men were scorched with great heat: and they blasphemed the name of God, who hath power over these plagues. Neither did they penance to give him glory.
    Rev 16:11 And they blasphemed the God of heaven, because of their pains and wounds: and did not penance for their works.

    • @csbstudios9979
      @csbstudios9979 2 роки тому

      Furthermore, a translation error in the Douay Rheims does not lead to an error in theology.

  • @jonathangoodwin646
    @jonathangoodwin646 3 роки тому +11

    And you Testament in property is do not add or take away From my words . Catholic Church has added and taken away if you look about not having any other gods they changed it and if you look at the the X books that's adding to God's word god forbids adding or taking away it's a serious offence.

    • @bridgefin
      @bridgefin 3 роки тому

      Actually Luther removed books. The church which gave you 27 New Testament inspired books also gave you 46 Old Testament inspired books. If the 27 books are from God then so are the 46.

    • @ronaldlatchman1268
      @ronaldlatchman1268 3 роки тому +1

      @@bridgefin that's a distraction that the Catholics use. Without getting into much details how does those 7 intertestament books add or take away from the New testament that clearly establishes Jesus as the source of Salvation, the author and finisher of my faith, My high priest whose throne of grace I have direct access to.

    • @bridgefin
      @bridgefin 3 роки тому

      @@ronaldlatchman1268
      Where did you et that New Testament from? Is it of divine origin? Who said it was?

    • @ronaldlatchman1268
      @ronaldlatchman1268 3 роки тому +2

      @@bridgefin Jesus said that heaven and earth will pass away but his words will never pass away. So I trust that Jesus used his faithful followers to preserve his new testament words. Were those followers members of the Catholic Church? For argument sake, let's say yes.
      1. Does that make the Church on equal authority with God's word? Many Catholics seem to think so. But that is erroneous.
      2. Does that make the Church infallible? Even more erroneous.
      God/Jesus used the Jews to preserve and pass on the old testament for thousands of years and what did they do? They became puffed up, made their TRADITIONS on equal par with Scriptures, Something that Jesus abhorred and rebuked, and yet still the Catholic Church has ran headlong into that same ERROR.
      On top of all that the Jews whom God used to preserve his word, rejected Jesus and placed him on the cross.

    • @bridgefin
      @bridgefin 3 роки тому

      @@ronaldlatchman1268
      You: Does that make the Church on equal authority with God's word? Many Catholics seem to think so. But that is erroneous.
      Me: Not the point. If God used the Catholic Church to reveal the canon of the 27 then why would you question God's authority when God gave us 46 books in the OT in the same document? If the 27 are God's then so are the 46.
      2. Does that make the Church infallible? Even more erroneous.
      Me: Do you consider the list of 27 infallible?
      God/Jesus used the Jews to preserve and pass on the old testament for thousands of years and what did they do? They became puffed up, made their TRADITIONS on equal par with Scriptures,
      Me: What the Jews did not have was Jesus' promise to sent the spirit of truth to the leaders of the Catholic Church, the apostles, to be with them forever.
      When you accept what the Catholic Church teaches you are receiving Holy Spirit doctrine.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +2

    ​ @Michael *Too bad you are still wrong. Mal **1:11** is not what R Catholics distorted it to be. ​ Word for offering in Mal **1:11** is Minchah and Minchah does not refer to communion. It refers to gifts, meal, donations.. and all bloodless offering. You were implying Jesus' sacrifice on the Cross was bloodless*

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      Jesus made Himself a bloodless sacrifice for remembrance at the Last Supper.

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@Michael-nb4ng *Too bad the communion is only a remembrance of the Cross which is a blood sacrifice. You are wrong once again. You are tw as it goes. One moment you claimed Mal meant blood sacrifice. Now you claimed its not. Lol*
      you said
      Jesus made Himself a bloodless sacrifice for remembrance at the Last Supper.

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

      @@Michael-nb4ng *So make up your mind. Is it blood sacrifice in Mal **1:11** or is it not?*

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      @@faithalone2171.........YOU really really really need to read the Last Supper. REALLY !!!

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@Michael-nb4ng *You need to learn not to tw the Scriptures to fit your m m doctrines.*
      *REally.*
      you said
      ....YOU really really really need to read the Last Supper. REALLY !!!

  • @christianartists9185
    @christianartists9185 2 роки тому +7

    How do you reconcile " we are not trying to batch you" after saying the Pope's picture will haunt.

    • @Gmyman
      @Gmyman Рік тому

      After learning what Catholicism is up to, his picture will haunt many.

    • @christianartists9185
      @christianartists9185 Рік тому

      What is she up to? I'd be grateful for any examples.
      Notice he agrees that the Pope reaffirms to not adding any new doctrine but proclaiming that which Christ teaches (28:02-06).
      Also, in most of the pentecostal arguments that IV heard, it's said that one is saved by faith alone in Jesus. So there shouldn't be a problem with the Church or any other denomination as long as they believe in the Lord Jesus, don't you think?

    • @peterzinya1
      @peterzinya1 Рік тому

      @@christianartists9185 The CC wants to send you to hell with it by telling you that there is a safety net called pergatory. No real need to seek the Lord, because you can get saved by paying for your own sins. You need any more examples? No need to tell you about its priests whole sale raping little kids. Thats old news.

    • @samsimm
      @samsimm Рік тому

      From his words that he will not bash the Catholic and later mention that the picture of the pope will haunt you.
      From here, I can't accept his words from the bible because that's his interpretation. And he could be wrong. The protestant are always protesting till the end time.

    • @peterzinya1
      @peterzinya1 Рік тому

      @@samsimm no need to interpret the bible. it says what it means and means what it says.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +3

    ​ @Connor Mickelson *Blah you just copy pasted ns from your R Ct sites. Original Greek does not use "kecharitomene". It uses "charitoo". This is what Original Greek says:*
    (ABP+) And G2532  [3entering G1525  1the G3588  2angel] G32  to G4314  her, G1473  said, G2036  Hail! G5463  one being shown favor. G5487  The G3588  Lord G2962  is with G3326  you, G1473  O you being blessed G2127 G1473  among G1722  women. G1135 
    G5487 (Strong)
    χαριτόω
    charitoō
    khar-ee-to'-o
    From G5485; to grace, that is, indue with special honor: - make accepted, be highly favoured.
    *Stop changing the Bible R Catholic.*
    you said
    The reason I used full of grace is because in the original Greek version the word that is used is “kecharitomene” which comes from the Greek root “charis” meaning grace. 129\150 times this word is translated as “full of grace” in the King James Bible.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +5

    ​ @cucomonga joe *Bible does say Church (referring to all churches, not R Church) has certain authority to make decisions. The Church discovered the canon over centuries. Not R Church.*
    you said
    the canon itself is a product of tradition

    • @MonstersOfTheUniverse
      @MonstersOfTheUniverse 2 роки тому

      Scripture does not teach faith alone or scripture alone…
      We need to also obey gods law
      We cannot ever EARN heaven. We can only be granted mercy and grace,but it does not mean we can sin with abandon

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@MonstersOfTheUniverse *Of course Bible teaches Faith Alone doctrine (which is Salvation Not By Works). Salvation Not By Works is in two third of New Testament. Early writings also spoke of Salvation Not By Works. Augustine and Ambrose also translated Romans 3:28 as Faith Alone. Similarly many Old Catholic Bibles in 1400s.*
      Two third of NT says Salvation Not By Works. Luke 23:43 - the thief at the Cross believed in Jesus and he was in Paradise thereafter. NOT WORKS! John 1:29 - Christ the Lamb of GOD who takes away the sins of the world ... (NOT OUR WORKS) John 3:16 - saved by believing in Jesus. NOT WORKS! Acts 16:30-31 - saved by believing in Jesus. NOT WORKS! Rom 4. Vs 1-2 - justified NOT BY WORKS! Vs 3 - Abraham believed (FAITH) and was accounted as RIGHTEOUSNESS. Vs 4 - WORKS are debts . Vs 5 - he who DOES NOT WORK is JUSTIFIED . Vs 5 - God justifies the ungodly, Vs 5 - FAITH was accounted as RIGHTEOUSNESS. Vs 6 - Blessedness Apart from WORKS! Imputation of RIGHTEOUSNESS by FAITH. Vs 8 - imputation of RIGHTEOUSNESS apart from WORKS! Vs 9-10 - Abraham was made RIGHTEOUS BY FAITH BEFORE ANY WORKS! Vs 9-10 - Abraham received seal of RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE FAITH by imputation. NOT WORKS! Vs 11 - Promise to Abraham was through RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE FAITH. Vs 14-15 - Faith is made void by works of the law, works of the Law brings Wrath, Not salvation. Vs 22 - Abraham believed (FAITH) and was accounted as RIGHTEOUSNESS . Vs 22 - RIGHTEOUSNESS imputed on those who believed. Not those who WORKS! Rom 11:6 - IF IT IS WORKS, IT’S NO LONGER GRACE . 2 Cor 5:21 - GOD made Jesus who knew no sin to become sin for us, that we might become the RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD. Gal 2:16 - not justified by WORKS OF THE LAW, BUT BY FAITH IN JESUS. BY WORKS OF THE LAW, NO MAN IS JUSTIFIED! Gal 2:21 - if RIGHTEOUSNESS comes through the law, then Christ died in vain. Gal 3:1-5 - Paul said Christians who started by faith, why end up following WORKS of law (not only Mosaic laws)? Are you made perfect by flesh (WORKS)? Gal 3:1-5 - Did God do miracles by your faith believing or by your WORKS of law? Eph 2:8-9 - saved by grace through faith NOT BY WORKS. Eph 2: 8-9 - salvation is a GIFT. NOT WORKS! 2 Tim 1:9 - saved NOT according to our WORKS. Titus 3:5 - saved NOT BY WORKS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS. 1 Pet 2:24 - Christ (the Lamb of GOD) bore our sins … (NOT OUR WORKS).
      you said
      Scripture does not teach faith alone

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

      @@MonstersOfTheUniverse ⭐ Where else speaks of Faith Alone doctrine? ⭐
      5 sources say Faith Alone doctrine is true. 1. Scriptures. 2. Early writings. 3. Early Roman writings. 4. Old Catholic BIBLEs. 5. Acts 15 overturns James' work based salvation. Ask for proof. Only modern R Church says its false.

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

      @@MonstersOfTheUniverse ⭐ Was Luther the first to use Sola Fede? ⭐
      The answer is No.
      - Early writings speak of Salvation Not By Works (Faith Alone doctrine) - like Polycarp, Clement of Rome, Irenaeus, Justin Martyr, Clement of Alexandria
      - Old Catholic Bibles speak of Sola Fede - Nuremberg Bible (1483), “allein durch den glauben” and the Italian Bibles of Geneva (1476) and Italian Bible of Venice (1538) all used Sola Fede in Romans 3:28
      - Even Ambrose and Augustine translated Romans 3:28 as Sola Fede.
      ⭐ St. Augustine's commentary on James 2 Sola Fide. ⭐
      And the scripture was fulfilled which says, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. - James 2:23 That Abraham believed God deep in his heart is a matter of faith alone, but that he took his son to sacrifice him . . . is not just a great act of faith but a great work as well. (Sermons 2.9) - Augustine of Hippo
      And the scripture was fulfilled which says, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. - James 2:23 Abraham is the image of someone who is justified by faith alone, since what he believed was credited to him as righteousness. But he is also approved because of his works, since he offered up his son Isaac on the altar. (Gen 22:10-18) Of course he did not do this work by itself; in doing it, he remained firmly anchored in his faith, believing that through Isaac his seed would be multiplied until it was as numerous as the stars - Oecumenius

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@MonstersOfTheUniverse ⭐ Did Luther defined Faith Alone the same way as James? ⭐
      The answer is No. Luther used Faith Alone on Salvation. James used Faith Alone on Practical Christian Living. R Catholics are misrepresenting both parties.
      *Faith Alone doctrine encompasses:*
      Eph 2:8-9 - Salvation is Not By Works (⭐Salvation is By Faith Alone⭐ )
      Eph 2:10 - Saved to do good works (⭐Practical Christian Living is By Works, Not By Faith Alone⭐ James 2, Gal 5:22, 1 Cor 13)

  • @solafide9533
    @solafide9533 2 роки тому +2

    ​ @The Mysterious Cynthia X *Your lack of knowledge is evident.*
    *Bible was Never a Catholic Book. Scriptures was of Jewish Christian Origin! Scriptures was written by Jewish Christian Apostles and Jewish Prophets. 2 Thes **2:15**. NOT R Catholics. Scriptures came by ad 100s. Scriptures was committed to the Jews. Romans 3:1-2. NOT R Catholics. BIBLE was the tradition of the CHURCH (collectively all churches). NOT the effort of a single local church called R Church. Bible came 300years after Scriptures.*
    *Scriptures ot and nt came by Ad 100. Canon came when all churches affirmed the canon in ad 300s. Not the result of R Church alone. All churches decided. The 27 nt canon first came from a Christian named Athanasius. The R Church took it and claimed as its own. 2 more African councils affirmed the canon. Though there was no ecumenical council that decided the canon, all the churches more or less agreed with the 27 books canon. The truth is: there were still other canons floating around after ad 300s such as in ad592 and 1442.*
    ​*Council of Rome did not fix any canon. It merely cited 27 books canon. Not fix. Neither did Rome give the world any Bible. Compiling books that were already there in all churches for 300 years does not make Scriptures inspired. Jesus and apostles were already using inspired Scriptures; unless you claimed they used uninspired Scriptures?*
    *Council of Rome or Hippo Carthage were merely local councils. They only have jurisdiction over their local communities .. namely Rome and Africa. They had no jurisdiction over all churches in all parts of the world. Only ecumenical/universal councils with bishops of all churches had the authority to decide things for the whole of Christendom. Nothing of such happened. Council of Rome did not decide a canon for all churches (Church). Neither was Church of ROme the Church or Universal Church.*
    Why dont you cite me one ecumenical council with bishops of all churches that fixed a canon? Just one?*
    1
    2
    3
    you said
    OLD testament scriptures existed in limited form on scrolls and parchment but the NEW testament did not yet exist until AFTER Jesus established his church and was raised from the dead. OLD and NEW testaments were combined tiogtether in book form in the year 397 at the CATHOLIC Council of nicxea, and even afterwarsds most people could not read and did not have person copies of tghe bible either

  • @browncony3897
    @browncony3897 2 роки тому +7

    ​ @Andrew Drew *R Catholics love misquoting Scriptures. Heb 9:9 most certainly did not say "When you partake of the Eucharist you enter into the covenant". Which part says so?*
    you said
    When you partake of the Eucharist you enter into the covenant of the living God,
    Hebrews 9:9
    9 which is a symbol for the present time. Accordingly both gifts and sacrifices are offered which cannot make the worshiper perfect in conscience,

  • @keithmassaro2099
    @keithmassaro2099 2 роки тому +3

    Psalm 23:23:: Buy the truth and SELL IT NOT... BUY THE Truth and Sell it NOT..Amen..

    • @cynthiax56
      @cynthiax56 2 роки тому

      ➔ All of the following things that Protestants attack can be found in the Bible: Holy images are BIBLICAL and are not "Idols" ....
      ➔CARVED IMAGES IN THE TEMPLE OF THE LORD, INTERCESSION OF MARY AND THE SAINTS, HONOURING MARY, AND BOWING AS A SIGN OF HONOUR AND RESPECT
      (All copied from the protestant version of the bible by Cynthia X)
      Sacred Images are Biblical & mocking & destroying them is a serious sin, an act of blasphemy:
      ➨ SACRED IMAGES: Sacred images are not idols and it is an act of blasphemy to attack them:
      ● EXODUS 25:18-22 God commands Moses to make STATUES of Angels.

      ● NUMBERS 21:8-9 God commands another image to be made, a serpent.
      ● EZEKIEL 41:18-25 KJV
      ➔ EZEKIEL's VISION OF THE TEMPLE OF THE LORD ADORNED WITH CARVED IMAGES: ...
      18 And it was made with CHERUBIMS (ANGELS) and PALM TREES, so that a palm tree was between a CHERUB and EVERY CHERUB HAD TWO FACES;
      19 So that the FACE OF A MAN was toward the PALM TREE on the one side, and the FACE OF A LION toward the PALM TREE on the other side: it was made through all the house round about.
      20 From the ground unto above the door were CHERUBIMS (ANGELS) and PALM TREES made, and on the wall of the temple.
      21 The posts of the temple were squared, and the face of the sanctuary; the appearance of the one as the appearance of the other.
      22 The altar of wood was three cubits high, and the length thereof two cubits; and the corners thereof, and the length thereof, and the walls thereof, were of wood: and he said unto me, This is the table that is before the Lord.
      23 And the temple and the sanctuary had two doors.
      24 And the doors had two LEAVES apiece, two turning leaves; two leaves for the one door, and two leaves for the other door.
      25 And there were made on them, on the doors of the temple, CHERUBIMS and PALM TREES, like as were made upon the walls; and there were thick planks upon the face of the porch without.
      ➨ BOWING as a sign of honour / respect:
      ●1 KINGS 2:19 Solomon bows to his Mother. (he HONOURS Her)
      ● JOSHUA 7:6: 6 Joshua & the elders of Israel tore their clothing and lay prostrate (face down on the ground) before the Ark of the Lord. (an OBJECT)
      ➨ INTERCESSION OF MARY & THE SAINTS IN THE BIBLE ...INCLUDING BIBLICAL PROOF that SAINTS ARE NOT AMONG THE DEAD:
      The Protestant claim that we are forbidden to speak to / pray to Mary and the saints is NOWHERE in the Bible. In fact, the following scriptures were copied (by me) directly from the Protestant version of the Bible: ...
      ➨INTERCESSION of a holy person on our behalf:
      ● JOB 42:8 8 Now therefore take seven bulls and seven rams, and GO TO MY SERVANT JOB, and offer up for yourselves a burnt offering; and MY SERVANT Job SHALL PRAY FOR YOU, FOR I WILL ACCEPT HIS PRAYER NOT TO DEAL WITH YOU ACCORDING TO YOUR FOLLY; for you have not spoken of me what is right, as my servant Job has.
      ➨INTERCESSION of MARY: JOHN 2:1 At the wedding feast at Cana, it was Mary who asked Jesus to help the wedding party.
      ➨INTERCESSION OF THE SAINTS: REV 5:8 The prayers of the Saints are offered to Jesus the lamb.
      ➨The KING Honours his mother's request:
      ● 1 KINGS 2:20: Then she said, “I have one small request to make of you; do not refuse me.” And the king said to her, “Make your request, my mother, for I will not refuse you.”
      (Jesus is the Greatest King and he also honours his mother's requests)
      SAINTS ALSO WORKED MIRACLES:
      ➨ JOHN 14:12 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.
      ➨ PAUL RAISES A MAN FROM THE DEAD:
      ● ACTS 20:7-12
      9 And there sat in a window a certain young man named Eutychus, being fallen into a deep sleep: and as Paul was long preaching, he sunk down with sleep, and fell down from the third loft, and was taken up dead.
      10 And Paul went down, and fell on him, and embracing him said, Trouble not yourselves; for his life is in him.20:
      ● MARK 6:12-13...
      12 They went out and preached that people should repent.
      13 They drove out many demons and anointed many sick people with oil and healed them.
      ● ACTS 19:12 The Handkerchief of Paul healed sick people:
      12 so that even handkerchiefs and aprons that had touched him were taken to the sick, and their illnesses were cured and the evil spirits left them.
      ● ACTS 5:15 The shadow of Peter healed the sick:
      so that they brought the sick out into the streets and laid them on beds and couches, that at least the shadow of Peter passing by might fall on some of them.
      ➨SAINTS ARE NOT AMONG THE DEAD: AND THEIR INTERCESSION IS BIBLICAL: They share in the ressurrection of Jesus: (Protestants attack Biblical saints while they follow dead reformers)
      ● MATTHEW 27: 52 -53: When Jesus was raised from the dead Many were raised up with him. 53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.
      ● LUKE 23 v 39-43...Jesus told the good thief "today you will be with me in paradise"
      ● REV 19 v 14...when Jesus returns he will be accompanied by his heavenly armies of saints.
      ● 2 COR 5 v 8...Paul tells us that to be absent with the body is to be with the Lord.
      ● JOHN 11 v 25-26...Jesus said I am the ressurrection and the life, he who believes in me will live, even though they die; and whoever lives, believing in me will never die.
      ● LUKE 1619-30 The story of the rich man and Lazarus show The Rich man, Lazarus and Abraham, all concious and interacting with each other even though they have physically died.
      ● LUKE 9:30-31 And, behold, there talked with him two men, which were Moses and Elias:
      31 Who appeared in glory, and spake of his decease which he should accomplish at Jerusalem.
      (Moses & Elijah were alive, and were yalking with Jesus)
      ● REV 6:10 The souls of the martyrs are before the throne of God, crying out for justice. (they are conscious and actively petitioning God)
      ● HEB 12:1-3 Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles. And let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us,
      ● MATT 17:1-13 ...At the Transfiguration of Jesus, he is seen speaking to Moses and Elijah, further showing that Holy ones of God are not among the dead.
      ➨HONOURING MARY: LUKE 1:48: All generations will call Mary Blessed. We Catholics are the ones who call her the BLESSED Virgin Mary and treat her accordingly.
      RELICS OF THE SAINTSS
      ● 2 Kings 13:21
      The Bones of Elijah revived a man:
      21 And it came to pass, as they were burying a man, that, behold, they spied a band of men; and they cast the man into the sepulchre of Elisha: and when the man was let down, and touched the bones of Elisha, he revived, and stood up on his feet
      ● ACTS 19:12 The Handkerchief of Paul healed sick people:
      12 so that even handkerchiefs and aprons that had touched him were taken to the sick, and their illnesses were cured and the evil spirits left them.
      ● ACTS 5:15 The shadow of Peter healed the sick:
      so that they brought the sick out into the streets and laid them on beds and couches, that at least the shadow of Peter passing by might fall on some of them.
      ● MARK 6:12-13...
      12 They went out and preached that people should repent.
      13 They drove out many demons and anointed many sick people with oil and healed them.
      (the use of oil, a material substance was used to heal people)
      ➨NOWHERE does the bible permit protestants (or anyone else) to Scrutinize & monitor the prayers of other people, nor to judge their sincerity or their salvation.
      Protestantism does not come from jesus. It began with Martin Luther in 1517 & exists Only to oppose the Catholic church which Jesus founded 15 centuries B4 the protestant revolt. They only know & accept the PARTS of the Bible that suit them and they do not have an accurate bible either.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +5

    @Robin L *1. Canon was finalised by all churches. Not R Church. So why would R Church have any authority? If you claim R Church had all authority, where did that authority come from? Self declared??*
    *2. You ask S questions. They worshipped Jesus as per normal. Apostles were still passing down knowledge then.*
    *3. 40k refers to all kinds of Christian groups, including JW, SDA, Christian science, Rcc, Orthos. Not referring to Christians only. You do not seem to know. 40k are just churches. Bible mentions churches. God loves churches. Why R Church does the opposite?*
    *4. Bible does not even mention pope or papacy or Primacy of rome. So where did you self made doctrines come from?*

  • @mjsculdee
    @mjsculdee 10 місяців тому +1

    Praise Yeshua Jesus Christ for Standing against the errors of Roman Catholicism!

  • @jediv3381
    @jediv3381 2 роки тому +4

    ​ @Michael Speyrer *We are not talking about rites which came mostly after 1500s. We are talking about this C which was original Church of ROme founded in ad 300s; currently called R Catholic Church.*
    *Church of Rome in history was only a local church. Answer me. Since which year this local church became the Church or Universal Church?*
    you said
    The Catholic Church, again isn't only the Latin Rite, it is made up of 24 different parts, all of which agree with the entirety of the Orthodox World on the understanding of these texts and all have apostolic foundation, and they all disagree with you, as well as some protestant, non anti-Catholic scholars. This contradicts your premises.

    • @geraldjohnson8871
      @geraldjohnson8871 2 роки тому +2

      J D. l believe what he is saying is if Traditions of a church No matter which church does Not
      Equal the scriptures then they have added or taken away from GOD'S(Word) Purposes For Man. Shalowm AMEN HalleluYahh.

  • @jmdsservantofgod8405
    @jmdsservantofgod8405 2 роки тому +7

    Just keep Jesus in your heart……believe/have faith in Jesus and all he did! There is no one like the Lord and Savior of the World….Jesus! The Theme of the Bible is God’s Amazing Grace! Trust in the Lord with all your heart….don’t lean on your own understanding! You can join whatever religious club you want (catholic or whatever) go to church to get support from other believers!

    • @BdDaBOMB
      @BdDaBOMB 2 роки тому

      also Yahusha is the son of man's name who came in the name of the father YAHUAH our ALAHIM to deliver us all if we believe and obey the Sabbath

    • @brucewmclaughlin9072
      @brucewmclaughlin9072 2 роки тому +2

      @@BdDaBOMB please show in scripture where the sabbath is to be followed by the gentile believers of the new testament?

    • @BdDaBOMB
      @BdDaBOMB 2 роки тому

      @@brucewmclaughlin9072
      EXODUS 20:11
      Perhaps the Sabbath Commandment is void to the "gentiles" and their covetousness/murder shall reign free in the earth; as for me, the young family I lead in the name of the Yahusha our Messiah shall cleave onto the very clothes/house of Israel.
      Feel free to share inspiration as I do not own a physical Torah

    • @brucewmclaughlin9072
      @brucewmclaughlin9072 2 роки тому +1

      @@BdDaBOMB Believers in Christ are a new creation, believers in Christ are no longer under the law, Believers in the new testament are never commanded to observe the sabbath, they are encouraged to enter the sabbath rest from all works. To observe the sabbath is far different than just making saturday the day you worship God.

    • @BdDaBOMB
      @BdDaBOMB 2 роки тому

      @@brucewmclaughlin9072
      Although I do as the Messiah said and forgive, I do not believe in "christ" as such since it is a substitute. Also the Messiah stated his arrival was not to alter the law was but to fullfil. So to my understanding, which is in parts, *the commandments + the golden rule* is what we are to do to inherent everlasting life [look at the Messiah's reply to the lawyer in Luke for the detail]
      The Sabbath Commandment is something I shall remember and obey, another commenter revealed to me that the Sabbath is not on Saturday but rather on alternate days each month on the 8th, 15th, 22nd, 29th. Due to still learn I guide my rather young family to meditate, pray and sleep on the Sabbath... I hold more room to grow.

  • @DavidEsiromo
    @DavidEsiromo Рік тому +5

    You can't read the bible without the Holy spirit

    • @salachenkoforley7382
      @salachenkoforley7382 Рік тому +1

      Exactly true------51,000 different denominations of Protestants all diagreeing with each other on the same Bible is the result of reading the Bible without the Holy Spirit.

    • @johngraves9237
      @johngraves9237 10 місяців тому

      @@salachenkoforley7382 True Christians share the same gospel no matter the denomination. Catholics have a false gospel that replaces the Word of God

    • @kdmdlo
      @kdmdlo 3 місяці тому

      @endtimesareuponus8930 Hahahahaha. Good one.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +2

    ​ @Connor Mickelson *Too bad. You are terribly in docked by R Church. LEt's compare God's Word with what R Church teaches.*
    *R Catholic Church contradicts Scriptures in every possible ways!*
    1. Catholics say Mary was sinless. But BIBLE says Mary offered a sinner's offering. She was a sinner. Bible says Mary needed a Saviour. Lk 2:23-24, Lev 12:6-8, Rom 3:10.
    2. Catholics say clergies must be celibate. Yet BIBLE says Peter (supposed R Church first leader) had mother in law. Bible says celibacy is not a qualification for clergies. Mat 8:14-15, Mar 1:30-31, Luk 4:38-39.
    3. Catholics say Mary was forever virgin. Yet BIBLE says Jesus had brothers and sisters. Mary was not perpetually virgin. Mk 6:3, Mat 13:55, Mat 27:56, Mar 6:3, Mar 15:40, Mar 15:47.
    4. Catholics say confess to R priests in a box. BIBLE says nothing about confessing to priests in a box. Bible says confess to GOD only. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6, Romans 10:9-10.
    5. Catholics say drink of the literal blood of Jesus. Yet OT and NT both say do not drink blood. Acts 15, Lev 7:26.
    6. Catholics say pray to passed on Mary and "saints". Yet BIBLE says do not contact the dead. NT Church did not record a single case of NT believers asking passed on saints to pray for them. Deut 18:11, Isaiah 8:19.
    7. Catholics make and bow down to statues. BIBLE says do not bow down to graven images (statues). Deut 4, Exo 20:4-5.
    8. Catholics sprinkles “holy water”. But NT Church of the Bible mentioned nothing about “holy water”. There was no record of any Apostles sprinkling “holy water” on believers. Catholics claimed “holy water” came from OT. Yet Num 5:17 says “holy water” was water used to test adulterous women in OT temple. Hardly the same. Those were for Old Covenant Jews. Not New Testament Christians.
    9. Catholics say Peter was pope - bishop of all bishops. Yet BIBLE says Peter was just a leader of the Jerusalem Church. Bible says nothing of the office of bishop of bishops. Gal 2:9, Mat 16:18.
    10. Catholics say there is a seat of Peter. Yet BIBLE says nothing about it. Jesus said “not to lord over others”.
    11. Catholics has clergy priesthood. Bible says clergy priesthood was done away with in New Testament. There is no clergy priesthood in NT. Heb 7:27, 9:12, 10:10.
    12. Catholics preaches Works Salvation (faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved). Yet Bible says “believe in Jesus to be saved”. Bible says Works Salvation is cursed. Gal 1:8-9. Acts 16:30-31, John 3:16, Romans 10:9-10.
    13. Catholics says they must do Penance to atone for their sins. Yet Bible says repent, confess and sins will be forgiven. Catholic Bible changes the word “repentance” in NT into “penance”. Original Greek NT does not use or mean the word penance. Penance = work to atone for sins. Repentance = change of heart. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6.
    14. Catholics say Mary went straight to heaven without dying. Yet Bible says nothing about it.
    15. Catholics say Islam and Christianity have the same GOD. Yet Islam doesn't believe in death and resurrection of Jesus and Trinity.
    R Catholicism is full of contradiction and anti Scriptures. Nothing is more evil than a c--- disguising as Christianity deceiving many.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +5

    ​ @Michael *Mary = mother of Jesus. Not some mother of God or mother of all nations which some catholics claimed. Hilarious.*
    *Cite me one verse that calls Mary = mother of the Church or mother of God or mother of all nations? Where?*

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      See Romans 8: 29 & Rev. 12: 17.

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +3

      ​ @Michael *Too bad you are wrong once again. Rev 12:17 proves your R Church Mary is not perpetual virgin. You are full of contradictions.*
      Rev 12:17 📝 And the dragon was enraged with the woman, and he went to make war with the rest of her offspring, who keep the commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
      you said
      See Romans 8: 29 & Rev. 12: 17.

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      @@faithalone2171........Romans 8: 29 & Rev. 12: 17 do prove the Holy Mother. Sorry !!!

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +2

      ​ @Michael *Too bad you are wrong once again. Rev 12:17 proves your R Church Mary is not perpetual virgin. You are full of contradictions.*
      Rev 12:17 📝 And the dragon was enraged with the woman, and he went to make war with the rest of her offspring, who keep the commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
      you said
      See Romans 8: 29 & Rev. 12: 17.

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +3

      ​ @Michael *Too bad. You are wrong once again. Jesus is not our earthly brother; but spiritual brother. Jesus was the firstborn (in resurrection). Believers are next. Mary was Jesus' earthly mother. Not some spiritual mother. Once again you are mixing earthly and spiritual. This is called proof texting and taking out of context. Not proving doctrines at all.*
      *Sons of lucy always mix earthly with spiritual. That's where you get ab offsprings.*

  • @browncony3897
    @browncony3897 2 роки тому +4

    ​@Andrew Drew *We just did. Nowhere says Judas at unconsecrated or un transub bread. Nowhere says he left without eating blessed bread. You will have to prove your claims. Not me.*
    you said
    study all the accounts and you will work it out .

  • @sswogXXIII
    @sswogXXIII Рік тому +15

    Wow this lesson made me want to be catholic. Thank you !!!!!❤

    • @teddyhappy7807
      @teddyhappy7807 Рік тому

      This is morning God .

    • @teddyhappy7807
      @teddyhappy7807 Рік тому

      It's your sturbon

    • @Danielson-zj7yh
      @Danielson-zj7yh Рік тому +1

      You’re prideful. Why don’t you open your mind and listen instead of watching it with a defensive mindset. Hell won’t be fun

    • @fredost1504
      @fredost1504 Рік тому +1

      Gal 1:8-9 is not only for Catholics, but any faith so called that isnt in line with Pauls Gospel of 1 Cor 15:1-4. This Scripture says that ANYONE that preaches another Gospel(and by extension those that believe another Gospel as a result), is cursed. In light of that, you probably DONT want to be a Catholic. But then, without Right Division of Scripture, you probably dont want to be a Baptist or a Pentecostal either.

    • @browncony3897
      @browncony3897 Рік тому +1

      *R Catholicism has nothing to do with God and His Words. R Catholic Church contradicts Scriptures in every possible ways!*
      1. Catholics say Mary was sinless. But BIBLE says Mary offered a sinner's offering. She was a sinner. Bible says Mary needed a Saviour. Lk 2:23-24, Lev 12:6-8, Rom 3:10.
      2. Catholics say clergies must be celibate. Yet BIBLE says Peter (supposed R Church first leader) had mother in law. Bible says celibacy is not a qualification for clergies. Mat 8:14- 15, Mar 1:30-31, Luk 4:38-39.
      3. Catholics say Mary was forever virgin. Yet BIBLE says Jesus had brothers and sisters. Mary was not perpetually virgin. Mk 6:3, Mat 13:55, Mat 27:56, Mar 6:3, Mar 15:40, Mar 15:47.
      4. Catholics say confess to R priests in a box. BIBLE says nothing about confessing to priests in a box. Bible says confess to GOD only. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6, Romans 10:9-10.
      5. Catholics say drink of the physical blood of Jesus. Yet OT and NT both say do not drink blood. Acts 15, Lev 7:26.
      6. Catholics say pray to passed on Mary and "saints". Yet BIBLE says do not contact the dead. NT Church did not record a single case of NT believers asking passed on saints to pray for them. Deut 18:11, Isaiah 8:19.
      7. Catholics make and bow down to statues. BIBLE says do not bow down to graven images (statues). Deut 4, Exo 20:4-5.
      8. Catholics sprinkles “holy water”. But NT Church of the Bible mentioned nothing about “holy water”. There was no record of any Apostles sprinkling “holy water” on believers. Catholics claimed “holy water” came from OT. Yet Num 5:17 says “holy water” was water used to test adulterous women in OT temple. Hardly the same. Those were for Old Covenant Jews. Not New Testament Christians.
      9. Catholics say Peter was pope - bishop of all bishops. Yet BIBLE says Peter was just a leader of the Jerusalem Church. Bible says nothing of the office of bishop of bishops. Gal 2:9, Mat 16:18.
      10. Catholics say there is a seat of Peter. Yet BIBLE says nothing about it. Jesus said “not to lord over others”.
      11. Catholics has clergy priesthood. Bible says clergy priesthood was done away with in New Testament. There is no clergy priesthood in NT. Heb 7:27, 9:12, 10:10.
      12. Catholics preaches Works Salvation (faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved). Yet Bible says “believe in Jesus to be saved”. Bible says Works Salvation is cursed. Gal 1:8-9. Acts 16:30-31, John 3:16, Romans 10:9-10.
      13. Catholics says they must do Penance to atone for their sins. Yet Bible says repent, confess and sins will be forgiven. Catholic Bible changes the word “repentance” in NT into “penance”. Original Greek NT does not use or mean the word penance. Penance = work to atone for sins. Repentance = change of heart. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6.
      14. Catholics say Mary went straight to heaven without dying. Yet Bible says nothing about it.
      15. Catholics say Islam and Christianity have the same GOD. Yet Islam doesn't believe in death and resurrection of Jesus and Trinity.

  • @jerryjenkins9494
    @jerryjenkins9494 10 місяців тому +2

    Catholics could care less what you think.We love jesus and pray.What difference does it make as alone as christ is taught.

  • @kkdoc7864
    @kkdoc7864 4 роки тому +13

    Every false religion begins with the minimizing of Scripture. That happens in Catholicism, Mormonism JW’s etc etc.

    • @kkdoc7864
      @kkdoc7864 4 роки тому

      Tiff the watchtower is your God

    • @kkdoc7864
      @kkdoc7864 4 роки тому

      Tiff Not a joke, my friend.

    • @sergalvisc
      @sergalvisc 4 роки тому

      @Pat Ratzinger As far as I know we actually don't have real concrete proof to that. We only have the experience of some people who were involved in these groups.
      So that's why they say their conspiracies still.

    • @bridgefin
      @bridgefin 4 роки тому +1

      All of Protestantism also comes from Catholicism. And Catholicism comes from Jesus. The problem is not the source but those who have left Jesus along the way to follow sinners instead of Jesus.

    • @kkdoc7864
      @kkdoc7864 4 роки тому +1

      @@bridgefin you really are ignorant of the conglomerate of the RCC, and how in the early 300’s paganism became entwined with the true early church. Why is Rome the center of Catholicism when it started in the churches in Ephesus, Corinth, Jerusalem etc? Take a look at an unbiased history of the corruption within it. It is definitely NOT the same church Christ started. Many people throughout the centuries tried to fix the heresies, but the RCC murdered them. The RCC kept the Bible away from all followers of Jesus for 1000 years so that the gullible people had to believe whatever the church told them was true. Have you even looked at the heresies the pope is speaking currently?? You absolutely need another Luther or someone like him to fix your so called “church”. It is run by a “homosexual mafia”. Check out a catholic UA-cam channel called Church Militant.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +4

    ​ @Michael *Too bad. Bible says true faith comes from the Word of God. Romans 10:17. You are just referring to your own m m bfaith.*
    you said
    ....Too bad YOU have no faith in Jesus.

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      My faith tells me that Malachi 1: 11 was fulfilled at the Last Supper and when the Gospel went out to all nations.

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +2

      @@Michael-nb4ng *Too bad. True faith comes by the Word of God. Doctrines comes by what the Scriptures Does Say. Not what you made it to say. Mal **1:11** says bloodless offering. Not blood sacrifice that you always claimed. Yours is clearly Bfaith.*

  • @jesusfaith2232
    @jesusfaith2232 2 роки тому +3

    Who has the authority to interpret Scripture in Roman Catholicism!
    How do you know the Roman Catholic Church is the one true church in that it has the authority to forgive sins, give the sacraments, and interpret Scripture? Is it because you believe the Roman Catholic Church is true because it says it is the true church? If so, then is that a good enough reason? If it is, then what do you do when another church claims to be the one true church? Is a simple claim sufficient? Of course not. Besides, if you trust whatever the Roman Catholic Church says about itself, then there’s no way to verify if it is true or false because you would always believe whatever it says. So, if by some chance that was false, you would never know. I have to ask, where does the Roman Catholic get its authority to interpret Scripture accurately and truthfully?
    The most common answer I’ve heard from Roman Catholics as to why their church is true is that Jesus gave the apostles the authority to teach the truth, to forgive sins, to administer the sacraments, and to interpret Scripture. Okay, if that is your position, then why is that your position? Where do you get the idea that Jesus gave the apostles the apostolic authority? Is it because the Roman Catholic Church just claims it has the authority or is there something more? Is it because you go to the Bible and cite verses such as the following . . .
    Matthew 16:18-19, “And I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades shall not overpower it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; and whatever you shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”
    John 20:22-23, “And when He had said this, He breathed on them, and said to them, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit. 23 If you forgive the sins of any, their sins have been forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they have been retained.’“
    1 Corinthians 11:2, “Now I praise you because you remember me in everything, and hold firmly to the traditions, just as I delivered them to you.”
    2 Tim. 1:13-14, “Follow the pattern of the sound words which you have heard from me, in the faith and love which are in Christ Jesus; guard the truth that has been entrusted to you by the Holy Spirit who dwells within us.”
    Is it because of Scriptures like these that you believe the Roman Catholic Church is the one true church? If so, then I have some questions for you.
    By what authority do you interpret the word of God?
    How do you know your interpretations of the Scriptures are correct?
    Are you giving a private interpretation of the word of God?
    Are you interpreting these verses for yourself without the authority of the Roman Catholic Church?
    Are you subjecting the entire Roman Catholic Church to your interpretation of Scripture and thereby concluding it is true?
    If you reply that you were just reading what the Scriptures say, then when I do the same thing and conclude that the Roman Catholic Church is not the true church, then you can’t argue with me since I also am interpreting the Scriptures the same as you. But, if you say that I am wrong and you are right, then how do you know without asserting your own authority?
    But, if you believe the Roman Catholic Church is the one true church and it has the authority to interpret Scripture, then you don’t have the authority to interpret it in a manner different from what they tell you it means-which is the same as not being able to interpret at all without it being your own “private interpretation.” And, if you believe what the Scriptures say and your conclusion is that the Roman Catholic Church is true, then you are subjecting the entire Roman Catholic Church to the validity of your own interpretations.
    Do you see the problem from your perspective? You are required to subject yourself to whatever the Roman Catholic Church tells you is true, yet you do the opposite when you look at Scripture to judge the Roman Catholic Church to be true!

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      Jesus did build ONE CHURCH, and gave it power to bind/loose in heaven; and promised to protect it against the ' gates of heaven ' as is written in Matt. 16: 17-19, 28: 18-20. He promised to send His Holy Spirit and delivered in Acts 2. Jesus has kept His Word, and His Holy Roman Church has prevailed against much persecution.......even to today.

    • @wjtruax
      @wjtruax 2 роки тому

      Who do you grant authority to interpret Scripture for you? Everyone gives someone authority to interpret Scripture for them, even if it is themselves. Frankly, I'm tired of having to be the final authority for Scripture and faith in my life. It's exhausting. The single word that encapsulates the entirety of the Christian life is "submission." I no longer have to be the final authority for faith and practice in my life. There are aspects of Catholic worship that are uncomfortable for me, but I submit myself to them because it's not about me. Our Lord spoke much about submission to Him and to His Church. He said nothing about following any written documentation of His time on earth, or of what His Apostles would eventually write. If Scripture were supposed to be our only authority for faith and practice, why didn't He say so, repeatedly?
      Have you seen John MacAuthur's Bible Commentary? It's longer than the Bible itself. How can Scripture be so clear, self-explanatory, perspicacious, and sufficient if a commentary on what it contains is longer than the Scriptures themselves? Then you could pick up a Scofield Reference Bible and find completely different interpretations. And what about the sheer arrogance of allowing Holy Scripture to be printed baring one's own name?

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      @@wjtruax.........What needs interpretation ??? Jesus spoke in the simplest way to the simplest people = parables. It is in the ' interpretations ' that satan gets free rein to deceive..........see Genesis 3: 1-6 and Matt. 4.

    • @jesusfaith2232
      @jesusfaith2232 2 роки тому +1

      @@wjtruax You: who do you grant authority to interpret scripture for you …..me: the Holy Spirit, He opens the eyes, if you studied scripture you would know this!

    • @jesusfaith2232
      @jesusfaith2232 2 роки тому +1

      @@wjtruax
      Pope Pius XII, Humani generis (# 21), Aug. 12, 1950: “This deposit of faith our Divine Redeemer has given for authentic interpretation not to each of the faithful, not even to theologians, but only to the Teaching Authority of the Church.’”
      Have you seen RC with their own interpretations? all over the place and we can see why, RC listen to the pope and not the Holy Spirit…simple really!
      Just one example, your “father” H J Hubert says in Rev 12 it’s Israel NOT Mary and he would be right! ….take care!

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +2

    ​ @Connor Mickelson *There you go. You are exposed for your ignorance of not reading the Bible. That's totally not what Bible defines as "saint". Bible calls all believers saints.*
    *I bet you dont even know there is no such thing as canonised R church saints in the Bible. In all the usages of the word "saint"in the Bible, saints always refer to general believers. Not some special class of r church believers who are so called "holy" or have had some "achievements"?*
    *Paul cant be talking about ministering to passed on saints can he>?*
    Rom_15:25 But now I am going to Jerusalem to minister to the saints.
    Rom_15:26 For it pleased those from Macedonia and Achaia to make a certain contribution for the poor among the saints who are in Jerusalem.
    Rom_15:31 that I may be delivered from those in Judea who do not believe, and that my service for Jerusalem may be acceptable to the saints,
    Co_16:15 I urge you, brethren-you know the household of Stephanas, that it is the firstfruits of Achaia, and that they have devoted themselves to the ministry of the saints-
    2Co_1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, and Timothy our brother, To the church of God which is at Corinth, with all the saints who are in all Achaia:
    2Co_8:4 imploring us with much urgency that we would receive the gift and the fellowship of the ministering to the saints.
    There you go:
    More verses.
    Rom_1:7 To all who are in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.
    Rom_8:27 Now He who searches the hearts knows what the mind of the Spirit is, because He makes intercession for the saints according to the will of God.
    Rom_12:13 distributing to the needs of the saints, given to hospitality.
    Rom_16:2 that you may receive her in the Lord in a manner worthy of the saints, and assist her in whatever business she has need of you; for indeed she has been a helper of many and of myself also.
    Rom_16:15 Greet Philologus and Julia, Nereus and his sister, and Olympas, and all the saints who are with them.
    1Co_1:2 To the church of God which is at Corinth, to those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all who in every place call on the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both theirs and ours:
    1Co_6:1 Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?
    1Co_6:2 Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world will be judged by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters?
    1Co_14:33 For God is not the author of confusion but of peace, as in all the churches of the saints.
    1Co_16:1 Now concerning the collection for the saints, as I have given orders to the churches of Galatia, so you must do also:
    you said
    A saint is someone who has an exceptional degree of holiness, likeness or closeness to God

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +4

    ​ @Andrew Drew *You are spinning. Bible does not say the bread was transubstantiated or not transubstantiated. Neither Judas eating consecrated or unconsecrated bread. Lol. You are saying Jesus touched unconsecrated stuff? You meant Jesus sinned?*
    Joh 13:18 "I do not speak concerning all of you. I know whom I have chosen; but that the Scripture may be fulfilled, 'HE WHO EATS BREAD WITH ME HAS LIFTED UP HIS HEEL AGAINST ME.'
    Joh 13:26 Jesus answered, "It is he to whom I shall give a piece of bread when I have dipped it." And having dipped the bread, He gave it to Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon.
    Joh 13:27 Now after the piece of bread, Satan entered him. Then Jesus said to him, "What you do, do quickly."
    Joh 13:28 But no one at the table knew for what reason He said this to him.
    Joh 13:29 For some thought, because Judas had the money box, that Jesus had said to him, "Buy those things we need for the feast," or that he should give something to the poor.
    Joh 13:30 Having received the piece of bread, he then went out immediately. And it was night.
    you said
    Judas ate unconcercrated bread in other words un transubstantiated bread which is what you eat and drink in your church cool-aide and crackers on your way out.

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      Yes !!! Jesus touched lepers/healed on the Sabbath/forgave a woman caught in adultry/ate with sinners/and hung on a tree for love of us. If He touched unconsecrated bread........then......so be it !!!

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +3

      @@Michael-nb4ng *Where in the Bible says Judas ate unconsecrated bread? So be it?*

  • @FreedomsNurse
    @FreedomsNurse 4 роки тому +17

    "The use of temples, and these dedicated to particular saints, and ornamented on occasions with branches of trees; incense, lamps, and candles; votive offerings on recovery from illness; holy water; asylums; holy days and seasons, use of calendars, processions, blessings on the fields, sacerdotal vestments, the tonsure, the ring in marriage, turning to the East, images at a later date, perhaps the ecclesiastical chant, and the Kyrie Eleison, *are all of pagan origin* (Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine, John Henry Newman, a cardinal by Pope Leo III in 1879, 1878, p351-353)

    • @kaitlyndevlin6955
      @kaitlyndevlin6955 4 роки тому +2

      The Kyrie Ellison is pagan? It literally means Lord have mercy

    • @FreedomsNurse
      @FreedomsNurse 4 роки тому +1

      @@kaitlyndevlin6955 Perhaps this is referring to repetitive chanting.

    • @thomasfolio4357
      @thomasfolio4357 4 роки тому +3

      The usual perhaps. Minor error it was Pope Leo XIII. What was the source you used? Was it the actual Essay by Cardinal Newman, or a book quoting him to disprove the Catholic Faith. I ask because there have been many who have "used" Newman to disprove Catholicism. What they end up doing is showing their poor scholarship. Newman who before his Conversion to the Catholic Faith was quite anti-Catholic. He did as many do today and read only misrepresentations of the truth. For example the poor scholar Boettner tells us that Newman said the Papacy and it's authority developed over time and has no place in Scripture. Given the poor scholarship in this video, and in Boettner, he does not give any footnotes or cite his sources. The truth is that the quote can be found in Newman's apologia. He states clearly in the sections of the text omitted by the Protestant writer, where Newman tells us that these are what he used to believe and wrote it before he learned from reading history that only the Catholic Church maintained the teachings of Christ handed down by His Apostles. Makes a bit of a difference. But then one would have to apply the prohibition in the Decagogue to not bear false wittness, as this posting as well as video seem to ignore.

    • @PInk77W1
      @PInk77W1 4 роки тому +1

      Pagan ? The Bible says to go change the world.
      So we Catholics change pagan things and give them to God

    • @FreedomsNurse
      @FreedomsNurse 4 роки тому +1

      @@thomasfolio4357 What source was used? I gave the reference in my original post. You can look it up on Google Books as I did to make sure.

  • @chloeryanvtuber
    @chloeryanvtuber 3 роки тому +25

    Every denominational church I've seen is in the same boat. Cherry picking scriptures instead of looking at the whole of scripture, and twisting the teachings of Jesus to fit their lifestyle.

    • @veekee75
      @veekee75 3 роки тому +2

      And all RCC don't even wanna use the Bible. They simply come up with their own dogmas which conflict directly with the Bible. That is the real anathema!

    • @johndardi1334
      @johndardi1334 2 роки тому

      @@veekee75 The Roman Catholic Church is evil. Plain and simple

    • @wakeupcall8188
      @wakeupcall8188 2 роки тому +1

      @@veekee75
      We gave you Bible
      Check your facts
      Check your history

    • @wakeupcall8188
      @wakeupcall8188 2 роки тому

      @@johndardi1334
      And show me their teachings

    • @veekee75
      @veekee75 2 роки тому +1

      @@wakeupcall8188 Scriptures are from God. Check your facts. Check your history.

  • @browncony3897
    @browncony3897 Рік тому +2

    @Colin Lavelle *Simple reason. R Catholicism has nothing to do with God and His Words. R Catholic Church contradicts Scriptures in every possible ways!*
    1. Catholics say Mary was sinless. But BIBLE says Mary offered a sinner's offering. She was a sinner. Bible says Mary needed a Saviour. Lk 2:23-24, Lev 12:6-8, Rom 3:10.
    2. Catholics say clergies must be celibate. Yet BIBLE says Peter (supposed R Church first leader) had mother in law. Bible says celibacy is not a qualification for clergies. Mat 8:14-15, Mar 1:30-31, Luk 4:38-39.
    3. Catholics say Mary was forever virgin. Yet BIBLE says Jesus had brothers and sisters. Mary was not perpetually virgin. Mk 6:3, Mat 13:55, Mat 27:56, Mar 6:3, Mar 15:40, Mar 15:47.
    4. Catholics say confess to R priests in a box. BIBLE says nothing about confessing to priests in a box. Bible says confess to GOD only. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6, Romans 10:9-10.
    5. Catholics say drink of the physical blood of Jesus. Yet OT and NT both say do not drink blood. Acts 15, Lev 7:26.
    6. Catholics say pray to passed on Mary and "saints". Yet BIBLE says do not contact the dead. NT Church did not record a single case of NT believers asking passed on saints to pray for them. Deut 18:11, Isaiah 8:19.
    7. Catholics make and bow down to statues. BIBLE says do not bow down to graven images (statues). Deut 4, Exo 20:4-5.
    8. Catholics sprinkles “holy water”. But NT Church of the Bible mentioned nothing about “holy water”. There was no record of any Apostles sprinkling “holy water” on believers. Catholics claimed “holy water” came from OT. Yet Num 5:17 says “holy water” was water used to test adulterous women in OT temple. Hardly the same. Those were for Old Covenant Jews. Not New Testament Christians.
    9. Catholics say Peter was pope - bishop of all bishops. Yet BIBLE says Peter was just a leader of the Jerusalem Church. Bible says nothing of the office of bishop of bishops. Gal 2:9, Mat 16:18.
    10. Catholics say there is a seat of Peter. Yet BIBLE says nothing about it. Jesus said “not to lord over others”.
    11. Catholics has clergy priesthood. Bible says clergy priesthood was done away with in New Testament. There is no clergy priesthood in NT. Heb 7:27, 9:12, 10:10.
    12. Catholics preaches Works Salvation (faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved). Yet Bible says “believe in Jesus to be saved”. Bible says Works Salvation is cursed. Gal 1:8-9. Acts 16:30-31, John 3:16, Romans 10:9-10.
    13. Catholics says they must do Penance to atone for their sins. Yet Bible says repent, confess and sins will be forgiven. Catholic Bible changes the word “repentance” in NT into “penance”. Original Greek NT does not use or mean the word penance. Penance = work to atone for sins. Repentance = change of heart. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6.
    14. Catholics say Mary went straight to heaven without dying. Yet Bible says nothing about it.
    15. Catholics say Islam and Christianity have the same GOD. Yet Islam doesn't believe in death and resurrection of Jesus and Trinity.
    you said
    Oh here we go again....more catholic bashing. Why are so many protestant evangelicals so obsessed with catholicism?

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +4

    ​ @Andrew Drew *Really? Where in John 6 says "The bread and wine become the body and blood transubstantiated by the energies of Holy Spirit."? Where? You are adding to Scriptures what it does not say?? Rev 22:18-19 is for you.*
    you said
    The bread and wine become the body and blood transubstantiated by the energies of Holy Spirit.

    • @TheBinaryWolf
      @TheBinaryWolf 9 місяців тому +1

      The eucharist is symbolic, for Jesus Himself forbids consumption of blood. To the Roman Catholic that believes the fruit juice and wafer turn into actual flesh and blood--after the minister mutters a meaningless phrase in Latin--does the wafer than tast like meat, and juice taste like blood?
      As an ex-catholic who took "communion" every week, I assure you the wafer did not change into flesh, nor did the fruit juice change to blood...not for me or anybody else that attended St. Mary's church, though Mary does not have a church. Only Jesus has a church. Good grief! How can they not see the falsehood of papal Rome?

  • @malvokaquila6768
    @malvokaquila6768 3 роки тому +6

    But you say, ‘If a man tells his father or his mother, “Whatever you would have gained from me is Corban”’ (that is, given to God) then you no longer permit him to do anything for his father or mother,
    thus making void the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down.

    • @malvokaquila6768
      @malvokaquila6768 2 роки тому

      @lex ora I have no traditions. Your wrong at the outset. Want to try again?

    • @malvokaquila6768
      @malvokaquila6768 2 роки тому

      @lex ora can you read english?

    • @malvokaquila6768
      @malvokaquila6768 2 роки тому

      @lex ora Yeah I didn't think so. That's ok, English is a very hard language. When you can read it and comprehend enough to make a response, feel free to talk to me. A response is simply responding to what a person says. I have been all to aware that when English is not your first language it's idiosyncrasies can go above your head.
      I do not converse with people who talk at me. It's literally pointless.
      reessayer.
      Vaya con Dios
      P.S. When your comprehension improves here is a good question to answer.
      Do you think that Christianity approves or rejects the breaking up of a marriage and selling the wife into slavery?

    • @malvokaquila6768
      @malvokaquila6768 2 роки тому +1

      @lex ora Great, you agree with the Protestant/reformers on at least one thing that the Roman Catholic church shouldn't be doing. That would be selling their own Priests wives into slavery after dissolving the union.
      If you also get to have both elements at the Lords Supper feel free to thank the nearest protestant as at that time the wine/blood was considered too Holy for the non-priest to have. There are still places today where Roman Catholic priests administer only the bread to church goer.
      I could go on, some of the protestants stayed in the Roman Catholic church and corrected its doctrine internally in accordance to what the protestants were accusing. As a funny aside you would agree with the protestants on at least 75% of their complaints if you knew what they were. Most of the them were only concerning the RCC of violating their own bylaws, not doctrinal disputes. That is unless your ok with the RCC violating their own bylaws.
      You said "The Catholic church decides what us a valid marriage"
      "Only "God" decided what is a valid marriage"
      There fixed it for you.
      This was defined in writing in the OG OT to Moses and the Jews by God, not the Roman Catholic church. You can find this in Genesis and Expounded later by Moses and restated by the Apostle Paul. Hint it hasn't changed. The church has only one role, to agree with God.

    • @malvokaquila6768
      @malvokaquila6768 2 роки тому

      @lex ora Your ignorance of the history of the Roman Catholic church simply amazes me. All I can say is keep working on your reading, you'll find it eventually. Assuming your looking for truth. At the moment it's clear that your not.
      Oh and I'm still not a protestant. It was clear to me that the protestants took too much of the false Roman dogma with them. They got rid of most of it, but it only takes a little poison to ruin a good thing. The good news is that the Roman Catholics church also purged much of the poison too. Now they only have a little left, unfortunately it's also central to their doctrines.
      Well seeing as how you are a clear bad faith interlocutor I wont be wasting my time responding to any more of your personal opinions. It's litterally history you can go read it for yourself.
      Vaya con Dios.

  • @patquint3291
    @patquint3291 2 роки тому +5

    The devil loves division. The devil loves the system of Protestantism.

  • @gloryofGod2023
    @gloryofGod2023 11 місяців тому +1

    We are called by God into the light from darkness .Love the Bible's truths. God will be pleased with you .

  • @jediv9492
    @jediv9492 2 роки тому +3

    ​ @Michael *You kept dodging. So who says R Church = the Church? Where is your proof?*

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      Proof that the RCC is the true Church is YOU and YOUR persecution.........see Matt. 16: 18, " and the gates of hell shall not prevail."

    • @jediv9492
      @jediv9492 2 роки тому +2

      @@Michael-nb4ng *Another S claim that lacks logic. Why? Church of Lucy was persecuted too. Cs too. Coms too. Does that mean its truth?*
      you said
      Proof that the RCC is the true Church is YOU and YOUR persecution.

    • @jediv9492
      @jediv9492 2 роки тому +2

      @@Michael-nb4ng *Which part of Mat 16 says its R Church? I love your claims. But claims is Not a proof for doctrines. Try harder.*
      you said
      see Matt. 16: 18, " and the gates of hell shall not prevail."

    • @jediv9492
      @jediv9492 2 роки тому +1

      ​ @Michael *You kept dodging. So who says R Church = the Church or true church? Where is your proof?*

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому

      @@jediv9492........Like I said, YOU persecution of the RCC is proof that the RCC is the true Church; problem is while YOU think YOU are persecuting the RCC.........it is Jesus that YOU are persecuting...........see Acts 9: 4.

  • @cynthiax56
    @cynthiax56 3 роки тому +6

    The False doctrines are Protestant doctrines: ➔The Bible ITSELF Contradicts Luther's doctrine of "scripture alone" (solascriptura) The Bible tells us that the authority is THE CHURCH: ...
    ● 1 TIMOTHY 3:15 The pillar & foundation of TRUTH is the CHURCH.
    ● EPHESIANS 3:10 10 His intent was that now, THROUGH THE CHURCH, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,
    ● 2 THESS 2:15 We are to hold fast to the TRADITIONS we have been given, either by WORD OF MOUTH or by the letter.
    ● 1 COR 11:2 I commend you because you remember me in everything, and maintain the TRADITIONS even as I have delivered them to you.
    ● JOHN 21:25 Jesus said & did Many other things that are too numerous to be recorded in writing.
    ● HEB 13:17 Obey the eldars in the CHURCH.
    ● MATT 18:15-17
    15 Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.
    16 But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.
    17 And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto THE CHURCH: but IF HE NEGLECTS TO HEARTHE CHURCH let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.
    The True Church is a TEACHING Church: (to Teach means to impart knowledge that is not presently know....not in writing)
    ● JOHN 14:26-31
    26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall TEACH you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have SAID unto you. (Spoken words...not in writing)
    (To TEACH is to impart knowledge that is not presently known....not in writing)
    ● ACTS 8:31: And he said, HOW CAN I, (understand scripture) EXCEPT SOMEONE SHOULD GUIDE ME? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.
    (The scriptures are not for individual interpretation. They need the guidance of the CHURCH. It is PROTESTANTS who are following the doctrines of a man.)
    nnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
    ➔ Luther's doctrine of "Faith alone" is ALSO False:
    ➨ WORKS, PENANCE, & PURGATORY (All copied from the protestant version of the Bible by me)
    ➨WORKS:
    ● REV 20:12...The dead are judged BY THEIR WORKS.
    REV 22:12 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
    ● JAMES 2:18 Faith without works is dead
    ● MATTEW 19:17 Jesus tells us if we want to enter into Life, we must keep the commandments.
    ● MATTHEW 5:16 In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your GOOD DEEDSand glorify your Father in heaven.
    ● JAMES 2:24 A man is justified by works, and not by faith only.
    ● ROMANS 2:6 He will judge everyone ACCORDING TO WHAT THEY HAVE DONE.
    ● ROMANS 2:13
    13 (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.
    ● MATTHEW 7:21 Not everyone who says to me: "Lord Lord will enter into the kingdom of heaven but only those WHO DO THE WILL OF MY FATHER.
    ● PHILIPPIANS 2:12-13 Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, WORK OUT YOUR OWN SALVATION WITH FEAR AND TREMBLING; 13 for it is God who works in you both to will and to do for His good pleasure.
    ● MATT 25:35-40 JESUS tells us to feed the hungry & clothe the naked (good works). He further warns us that those who do NOT will be sent away into the eternal fire., but those who do these WORKS will enter the Kingdom of Heaven.
    ● LUKE 16:19-30 The story of Lazarus and the rich man shows us that the rich man went to hell for refusing to help Lazarus who was poor and hungry. (He refused to do good works)
    ● TITUS 3:14 KJV And let our's also learn to maintain good works for necessary uses, that they be not unfruitful.
    ● EPHESIANS 2:8-11 (KJV) Protestants "prove" their false doctrine of "faith alone" By quoting EPH 2:8-9 and they STOP before they get to number 10:
    8 For by GRACE are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
    9 Not of works, lest any man should boast. (most protestants stop here instead of continuing on to 10):
    ➨ 10 FOR WE ARE GOD'S WORKMANSHIP, CREATED IN CHRIST JESUS UNTO GOOD WORKS, WHICH GOD HAS BEFORE ORDAINED, THAT WE SHOULD WALK IN THEM.
    ● 1 COR 9:27 (KJV) (Paul speaking) But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a cast away.
    ● MATT 12:36-37
    36 But I say unto you, That every idle WORD THAT MEN SHALL SOEAK, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
    37 For BY THY WORDS THOU SHALL BE JUSTIFIED, and BY THY WORDS THOU SHALL BE CONDEMNED.
    (not by yout faith alone)
    ➨PENENCE: Protestants reject the idea that they must do "penence" (attempt to make up for the sins they have committed) ● Luke 19:8. Zacchaeus told Jesus if he has cheated anyone, he will repay them 4 times over.
    ● Mark 2:20 Jesus said (regarding his disciples): The days are coming when the Bridegroom will be taken away from them, and then they will fast.
    ● Matthew 6:16 When you fast, do not look dismal, like the hypocrits do
    ● Acts 26:20 RSV but declared first to those at Damascus, then at Jerusalem and throughout all the country of Judea, and also to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God and perform deeds worthy of their repentance.
    ● Acts 2:38-40: Do Penance and be baptized everyone of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins and you shall recieve the gift of the Holy Spirit. For this promise is to you AND YOUR CHILDREN, and to all who are far off who the Lord our God shall call.
    ➨PURGATORY:.
    ● 2 TIMOTHY 1: 16-18. Paul prays for the dead Onesiphorus.
    ● 1 PETER 4:6 The gospel was preached to the dead.
    ● 1 PETER 3:19 , Peter says that after the crucifixion and death of Jesus, that Jesus "went to speak to the spirits in prison", which means that there is a place people go to after they die that is a prison and not heaven nor hell.
    ● MATT 12:32 Whoever speaks a word against the son of man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will Not be forgiven, either in this world, nor in the "world to come" This implies that some sins are forgiven in the "world to come" (purgatory)
    ● also 1 COR 3:12-15 & more in the Catholic Bible: (2 Mace 12:46). “It is a holy and wholesome thought to pray for the dead, that they might be loosed from their sins”
    1 Peter 1:17

    • @mikesamuel9175
      @mikesamuel9175 3 роки тому +3

      The Bible tells us that the "CHURCH" refers to the BELIEVERS and NEVER was it meant to be the so-called "holy roman catholic religion", mate!! What kind of a Bible you are using and who guides you to interpret the Words of YAHWEH in the Bible??? The HOLY SPIRIT or the False Vicar of Christ named / called the Roman pontiff aka the "pope" (God in the FLESH as he was called during the Dark Ages or the Dreadful Inquisition where more than 60 MILLION innocent people were MURDERED by the pope (his soldiers of DARKNESS!!)).

    • @elainemoreland3908
      @elainemoreland3908 3 роки тому +1

      And also stated that people brag about their works. Helping people and animals when you can and not bragging about what you do.

    • @cynthiax56
      @cynthiax56 3 роки тому

      @@mikesamuel9175 The Bible and history BOTH disagree with you. Jesus founded HIS church 15 centuries before the protestant revolt was started by men like Luther and the bible tells us that he gave his authority to PETER the first Pope. ➨ JESUS gives authority of the Church TO PETER (NOT TO CONSTANTINE, Not to Luther, not Calvin, not Ellen White or any other "reformer" )
      ✦ MATT 16:13-19: Jesus gives keys of the Kingdom to PETER and builds his church upon PETER.
      ✦ ACTS 15:7-12: "After much debate had taken place, PETER got up and said to them, “My brothers, you are well aware that from early days God made his choice among you THAT THROUGH MY MOUTH THE GENTILES WOULD HEAR THE WORD OF THE GOSPEL AND BELIEVE."
      ✦ JOHN 21:15-19: Jesus tells PETER to "Feed my sheep"
      ➨ The body of PETER now lies under the altar of St Peter's basilica. Evidence is even shown by unbiased secular media giants National Geographic, A&E & a book: "The Bones of St Peter"
      ➨The True Church is a TEACHING CHURCH:
      (To TEACH is to impart knowledge that is not oresently known....not in writing)
      ✦JOHN 14:26-31
      26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall TEACH you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
      ✦JOHN 16:14:
      "When the Spirit of truth comes He will guide you to all truth."
      ✦ Acts 8:26-40 King James Version (KJV)
      30 And Philip ran thither to him, and heard him read the prophet Esaias, and said, Understandest thou what thou readest?
      31 And he said, How can I, except some man should guide me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.

    • @cynthiax56
      @cynthiax56 3 роки тому

      @@elainemoreland3908 I do not hear Catholics bragging about their works. I only hear protestants condemning us for doing good works while they pretend to know our motives.

    • @richpisula8336
      @richpisula8336 3 роки тому +1

      Wow, pray to the dead, no never.
      I reject ...

  • @srich7503
    @srich7503 3 роки тому +8

    Which bible is he reading from? Is it (part of) the Holy Scriptures that the Catholic/Orthodox church preserved by laboriously hand coping them over and over throughout the centuries before the invention of the printing press or is there another one out there? 🧐

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +2

    ​ @Turin21 *Too bad. You got that from Cinderella or wrote your own Bible? Where in the Bible says:*
    "Penance is a sacrament of the New Law instituted by Christ in which forgiveness of sins committed after baptism is granted through the priest’s absolution to those who with true sorrow confess their sins and promise to satisfy for the same."?
    *It is so clear you dont even read the Bible. Lol. Bible mentioned nothing about Penance or nt clergy priesthood which Bible says its already obsolete. Heb 7,9,10. So where did R Church priesthood come from? Lucy?*
    you said
    if you only knew 1/1,000,000 of what you purport to know about the Catholic faith you would know Penance is a sacrament of the New Law instituted by Christ in which forgiveness of sins committed after baptism is granted through the priest’s absolution to those who with true sorrow confess their sins and promise to satisfy for the same.

  • @MountCarmel007
    @MountCarmel007 2 роки тому +5

    Remember - Sunday Worship is the Invention of The Catholic Church!
    Watch "Enforced Sunday Worship Laws" by Pastor COX

    • @Michael-nb4ng
      @Michael-nb4ng 2 роки тому +1

      We worship daily in daily Mass. Sunday is the day that the apostles chose for communal worship and we follow........see Acts 20: 7.

    • @MountCarmel007
      @MountCarmel007 2 роки тому +1

      @@Michael-nb4ng Please watch "Who Changed the Sabbath" by Pastor CD Brooks
      Read Exodus 20v8-11, Mathew 12v36-37 and also James 2v10

  • @tonyornelas9374
    @tonyornelas9374 2 роки тому +14

    My brother is a catholic priest and when I talk to him about scripture he calls me a Bible thumper. I took that as a compliment but he didn't mean it to be.
    Catholics don't accept the Bible is God's truth or that satan is the god of this world.

    • @jesuschristislord77733
      @jesuschristislord77733 2 роки тому

      Just look at all the crimes against humanity committed by the Catholic "Church" over the two millennia.
      They've killed more people than any wars.

    • @brucewmclaughlin9072
      @brucewmclaughlin9072 2 роки тому +2

      @@margaretlobo9466 The difference between Catholicism & Protestantism ---- Faith, Hope and Love - the greatest is Love - 1Cor.13:13.
      There is no difference between protestant and catholic if they have repented of their sins and follow Christ.
      These are Commandments, not suggestions - for which there are Penalties for non-fulfillment - Hell for those who do not love , and for those who do it imperfectly, the exile - similar to OT 70 year Babylonian captivity -
      Sorry but the scriptures are very clear on if you repent God places your spirit in the heavenly realm with Jesus Eph 2:6 and there is no removal by God because you have sinned .You are given eternal life because of what Christ has done on the cross for you Coll 2:9-15 Eternal life is not eternal if you can lose it!.
      in the Prison of Purgatory where " * until * last-penny " Divine justice has to be first served - Matthew 5:25-26 - before progressing to Heaven.
      Purgatory is supposed to be the final clean up of the stain of unrepentant sin in your life and yet the scriptures tell us God removes all the sins from us when we repent and follow Him. There is no final cleanup as Christ has made you righteous in the sight of God , Christ has washed you in His blood to wash all your sins away , Christ has sanctified you 1 Cor 6:11
      Despite being born-again, we still have our Fallen human nature, which as Paul states we do things we ought not to do as well as not do the things we ought - including unloving words and thoughts - with which we fall again and again. If anybody says s/he has no sin, is a liar and the truth is not in him/her.
      Your spirit is born again because like Mary the mother of Jesus we are born in the image of Adam, not God. Our spirits are born again , our flesh is not.
      Because He was going away, Jesus lovingly breathed His Spirit and empowered His Apostles on the very day of Resurrection from the dead to forgive sin - or to retain them - John 20:22-23.
      You may not have noticed but the apostles do not exist anymore nor is there any concept in scripture to say there was any succession of forgiving /retaining sins given to anyone else.
      All believers have the ability to forgive or retain as the prayer that Jesus said pray like this , indicates forgive us as we forgive others . if we choose to retain the sins of others it is to our detriment as we would not be following the example set by Christ.
      And James 5:16 urges - Declare your sins to one another - and that is why Catholics confess to their Priests.
      James 5:16 Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person is powerful and effective.
      This has nothing to do with forgiving sins but everything to do with maintaining a relationship with fellow believers and God.
      Protestants reject the formula of Jesus - God & Judge - John 5:22 - and thereby retain their sins.
      Your statement is not even close to what that verse says? A misquote?
      And Jesus also lovingly gave and **Commanded us to eat & drink *** His Body and Blood as * Real * Food & Drink for our Eternal Life - John 6:53-58. Catholics thus believe in the Real Presence of Jesus in Holy Communion and the need to receive it * worthily * - 1 Cor. 11:27. Despite this, Protestants declare the Lord's Supper to be " symbolic "
      Jesus does NOT want you to literally eat him. He wants you to eat up His word. That is why he said that he is the "bread of life".
      Anyone can see that this is not what he meant and I see it was quite convenient of you to purposely dismiss the rest of the context, which provides the explanation.
      So you just go on re-crucifying the Lord every Mass because what you are essentially saying is that Christ's work on the cross was not sufficient so you have to relive it every time you hold a communion. Paul also states in Hebrews that Christ's sacrifice was sufficient. So the bread is still bread. The wine is still wine. No mysticism occurring.
      Each Mass i have seen so far has the priest consecrate the bread and the wine and gives the bread to the Catholic but not the wine, so half a communion unlike what Jesus did.
      And Baptism - a one-time event - washes all our * Prior * sins, but we are still responsible and accountable for sins committed after.
      Please show in scripture that baptism only removes prior sins? However the rest of your statement is correct as we do confess our sins that we commit and even if we do not we are still forgiven because of what Christ has done. It is all Christ and none of us that gets us to heaven. 1 John 2:1,2 If we sin Jesus is there for us .
      We confess our sins to maintain our relationship with God even though we are totally forgiven of all of our sins .

    • @margaretlobo9466
      @margaretlobo9466 2 роки тому

      @@brucewmclaughlin9072 Protestants believe that Jesus incarnated to take away ALL sin - including future sins, and that their names are already recorded in the Lamb's Book of Life whereby their direct Heavenly entry is guaranteed.
      Catholics, on the other hand, believe that Jesus incarnated as a man to live sinlessly and die and thereby pay the penalty of Adam's sin which closed the gates of Heaven, and laid - Original Sin - on all descendants - you and me. His triumphant cry - It is finished - confirmed Mission Accomplished, and that Heaven was now open. And that Baptism is a - one-time - Grace - event which wipes all prior sins, but we are responsible for all sins after Baptism.
      The Catholic position is confirmed by God's " execution " of the couple Ananias and Sapphira from the 1st Christian Faith community, shortly after Jesus' Heavenly ascent, for just dishonesty and lying - Acts 5. Secondly, by Paul's urging the Corinthian church to expel the " wicked man living in sin with his father's wife " - 1 Cor. 5 .
      Thirdly, by Jesus' threat to vomit the lukewarm Laodicean church - Revelation 3.
      Fourthly, by the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD because the Jews sinned by not recognizing the time of Jesus' visitation, as well as the hypocritical attitude of the Pharisees, Chief Priests and Scribes.
      Fifthly, that God is a God of Justice and allows no Favouritism. Surely the - Angry - God who so severely punished OT people for their sins, would not suddenly change and look the other way when NT persons kill and beat up on each other, whilst trampling on God's Commandments - not suggestions - of Love of God and Neighbour. For most of our sins are trespasses against neighbour, and God is our Father who will allow no ill-will against others. As an example, if I keep on breaking your windows and God keeps on forgiving me unconditionally, then God will be unjust to you. However, in Matthew 18:32-35 - Jesus warns that the Heavenly Father will send to the torturers those who do not forgive. Even the Lord's Prayer declares that God will only forgive us in the measure that we forgive others. And in Hebrews 10:30, God declared - Vengeance is Mine - I will repay - when the Lord will judge His people.
      Sixth. If Jesus paid our sin debt in full, why does God still require to chastise and scourge - every - child before He will receive them into Heaven - Hebrews 12:6.
      Seventh. Why will Christians who do works of the flesh not inherit the Kingdom - Galatians 5:19-21.
      Eight. If a Believer of your denomination today declares that Jesus is Lord - Romans 10:9 - but tomorrow crosses the street, joins the church of satan and worships the devil, will s/he be saved ??

    • @brucewmclaughlin9072
      @brucewmclaughlin9072 2 роки тому

      @@margaretlobo9466 Secondly, by Paul's urging the Corinthian church to expel the " wicked man living in sin with his father's wife " - 1 Cor. 5 .
      Read on a bit further and see that Paul says satan is to destroy the flesh so that his spirit will be saved! The spirit that God places in the heavenly realm with Jeusu Eph 2:6
      Thirdly, by Jesus' threat to vomit the lukewarm Laodicean church - Revelation 3.
      Look at what is being spoken of and grab a cup of coffee . Hot tastes great , ice cold is wonderful but lukewarm is not palatable and the church in question was not on fire for the Lord nor had it gotten to be ice cold , it was a lukewarm church that was not doing the Lords work. Eph 2:10
      Fifthly, that God is a God of Justice and allows no Favouritism. Surely the - Angry - God who so severely punished OT people for their sins, would not suddenly change and look the other way when NT persons kill and beat up on each other, whilst trampling on God's Commandments - not suggestions - of Love of God and Neighbour. For most of our sins are trespasses against neighbour, and God is our Father who will allow no ill-will against others.
      You need to see that there was indeed a change in the beliefs of the people , and God ripped the temple curtain from the top to the bottom making for a direct relationship with God possible. No longer are priests standing ,sacrificing, praying for the sinners. Now we have Jesus who became the sacrifice Once and for ALL. There is our savior who has done everything possible for a sinful person to get to heaven without the punishment of sins Coll 2:9-15 However the sinner must repent and call upon the Lord to receive life and eternal life is given.
      As an example, if I keep on breaking your windows and God keeps on forgiving me unconditionally, then God will be unjust to you.
      unconditionally? No there are consequences to sin and they happen while you are alive . You reap what you sow.
      As a believer you are forgiven of all your sin , your name is written in the book of life , you are given salvation as a gift , you are given eternal life . Now all that is applied to your Spirit NOT your flesh.
      However, in Matthew 18:32-35 - Jesus warns that the Heavenly Father will send to the torturers those who do not forgive. Even the Lord's Prayer declares that God will only forgive us in the measure that we forgive others. And in Hebrews 10:30, God declared - Vengeance is Mine - I will repay - when the Lord will judge His people.
      Who is Jesus talking to?
      Is Jesus talking to born again believers in the Lord Jesus or the Jews under the law?
      We are no longer under the law the moment we repent , get baptized , and follow the Lord.
      2 Cor 5:16 So from now on we regard no one according to the flesh. Although we once regarded Christ in this way, we do so no longer. 17 Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away. Behold, the new has come! 18 All this is from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation:
      Sixth. If Jesus paid our sin debt in full, why does God still require to chastise and scourge - every - child before He will receive them into Heaven - Hebrews 12:6.
      Throughout Scripture, God portrays Himself as a Father. Those who have received Jesus as Savior are His children (John 1:12; Galatians 3:26). He uses the analogy of father/son because we understand it. He compares Himself to a loving father who not only blesses but disciplines His beloved children for their own good. Hebrews 12 goes on to show that those who do not receive God’s discipline are not legitimate children (verse 8). A loving father carefully watches his son, and when that son defies his orders and heads for danger, the father disciplines him to keep him safe. God does that with us. When a born-again child of God heads for sin or refuses to resist temptation, our Heavenly Father brings chastening into his life to direct him back to holiness.
      Chastening can come in the form of guilty feelings, unpleasant circumstances, loss of peace, relationship fractures, or any number of negative consequences for choosing sin. Sometimes, the chastening of the Lord can be physical illness or even death (1 Corinthians 11:30).
      Often, people ask if God is “punishing” them for wrong choices in the past. All our punishment for sin was exhausted upon Jesus on the cross (Romans 5:9). The wrath of God was poured out on Him so that for those who are “in Christ Jesus” (Romans 8:1) no wrath remains. When we give our lives to Christ, our Substitute for sin, our sin is forgiven and God remembers it no more (Hebrews 8:12; 10:15-18). However, often, our wrong choices in the past have brought about consequences now. God does not necessarily remove the natural consequences of sin when we repent. Those consequences are tools God can use to teach us, to prevent us from repeating the same mistakes, and to remind us of God’s grace.
      Seventh. Why will Christians who do works of the flesh not inherit the Kingdom - Galatians 5:19-21.
      1 Cor 15:50 Now I declare to you, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable.
      A believer in the Lord is a new creation .
      Read Gal 5:10-21 and you find Paul is pointing out what to avoid not that the believer is doing these things.
      Eight. If a Believer of your denomination today declares that Jesus is Lord - Romans 10:9 - but tomorrow crosses the street, joins the church of satan and worships the devil, will s/he be saved ??
      Gal 6:7 Do not be deceived: God is not to be mocked. Whatever a man sows, he will reap in return. 8 The one who sows to please his flesh, from the flesh will reap destruction; but the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.
      So lets see the individual confesses Christ, gets sealed by the Holy Spirit; is given the gift of salvation , is baptized , rises in newness of life , gets the fruit of the Holy Spirit , and walks in the spirit and not the flesh , somehow crosses the street and joins the church of satan ?
      1 Cor 3:15 salvation of the individual is not in question but the works of the individual are. As the context starts in verse 11 you see the individual is building upon the foundation of Christ . All of the individuals works are burnt up and they enter heaven with nothing to show for their life.
      You will not find any verse that tells you that God takes your spirit out of the heavenly realm , or the Holy Spirit removes His seal from you for any reason, and you do not find God telling Jesus that His sacrifice was not enough to cover the sins of the individual who sins.
      What if we do sin 1 John 2:1 Jesus is there for us.
      crossing the street to the church of satan is the same as lusting over a shiny new car , sin is sin and all of us have sinned and all of us will continue to sin.
      Our flesh is what crosses the road not our spirit.

    • @margaretlobo9466
      @margaretlobo9466 2 роки тому

      @@brucewmclaughlin9072 YOU - . You will not find any verse that tells you that God takes your spirit out of the heavenly realm , or the Holy Spirit removes His seal from you for any reason, and you do not find God telling Jesus that His sacrifice was not enough to cover the sins of the individual who sins. What if we do sin 1 John 2:1 Jesus is there for us. crossing the street to the church of satan is the same as lusting over a shiny new car , sin is sin and all of us have sinned and all of us will continue to sin. Our flesh is what crosses the road not our spirit.
      ME- So you believe that Hitler and Stalin, who were both baptized, yet the cause of mass murders, are now strutting around in Heaven ??
      ARE U 4 REAL ???
      Why does - 1 John 5:16-17 - distinguish between - deadly vs non-deadly sins, if our salvation is assured.
      Why would Jesus, God and Judge - John 5:22- warn that a Few make it to Heaven - Matthew 7:14., and Many go to Hell - Matthew 7:13. This is what Jesus was instructing in the Sermon on the Mount - one of the loftiest teachings of the God who came down from Heaven to teach us the Way, Truth and Life to Heaven. Moreover, Jesus urged Christians to - Strive - to make it through the narrow gate to Heaven - Luke 13:23-24. And that - More - is expected of Christians because we have the perfect example of Jesus - Luke 12:48.
      And why would Jesus, on the very day of His Resurrection from the dead, breath His Spirit - and - empower - His Apostles to forgive - or retain - sins - John 20:22-23.?? .
      NOTE= This was the same Breath that Jesus used to administer the Life-force to the earth-formed Adam - Genesis 2:7.
      And why would Jesus institute the Sacrament of Holy Communion ??But, “Lord, Lord, we ate and drank with you.” - Luke 13:26. Not good enough. What does Jesus want? He wants us not to eat with Him, He wants us to eat Him. “This is My Body, This is My Blood.” (Mark 14:22-23) For over two thousand years our Roman Catholic tradition has boldly proclaimed and professed and taught that Jesus Christ is truly present Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity at the Holy Eucharist at Mass. We call it the miracle of transubstantiation-the changing (trans) of the substance of bread and wine into the flesh and blood of Jesus.
      - ( continued )

  • @solafide9533
    @solafide9533 2 роки тому +9

    *OT Scriptures was there way before Jesus' time. NT Scriptures was already in all churches by AD100s. Jesus and APostles were already using inspired Scriptures. Believers did not have to wait for the BIBLE that came 300 years later to know what GOD says in the Scriptures.*

    • @miketeixeira7853
      @miketeixeira7853 2 роки тому +1

      The OT should have given the Jews every reason to welcome Jesus, but they rejected Him..........even the apostles abandoned Him. The gentiles accepted Jesus readily.......without knowing the OT. That is Grace !!!

    • @solafide9533
      @solafide9533 2 роки тому +1

      @@miketeixeira7853 *Your theory is warped. The first few thousands who accepted Christ were Jewish Proselytes who came from all over. THey do know the Old Testament.*
      YOU:
      The OT should have given the Jews every reason to welcome Jesus, but they rejected Him..........even the apostles abandoned Him. The gentiles accepted Jesus readily.......without knowing the OT. That is Grace !!!

    • @miketeixeira7853
      @miketeixeira7853 2 роки тому

      @@solafide9533............See the great faith of the Roman centurion in Matt. 8: 8-10, and Jesus answers, " I have found no one in Israel with such great faith."

    • @solafide9533
      @solafide9533 2 роки тому +2

      @@miketeixeira7853 *As usual what are you proving Mike Teixeira roman pagan?*
      YOU:
      ............See the great faith of the Roman centurion in Matt. 8: 8-10, and Jesus answers, " I have found no one in Israel with such great faith."

    • @miketeixeira7853
      @miketeixeira7853 2 роки тому

      @@solafide9533.........Just showing YOU what Jesus thought.

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +1

    ​ @Turin21 *You asked this question because you don't even know what is Church or Churches in the Bible. Once you know the meaning of Church you will know it does not matter. Church has always referred to believers. So it does not matter "When".*
    *Bible mentions both Church and churches. Let's look at all the usages of the words Church and Churches to know what they really meant.*
    1. *Bible mentions Church in general referring to all churches as a whole.*
    1Co 11:22 What! Do you not have houses to eat and drink in? Or do you despise the church of God and shame those who have nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I praise you in this? I do not praise you.
    1Co 12:28 And God has appointed these in the church: first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, varieties of tongues.
    1Co 14:4 He who speaks in a tongue edifies himself, but he who prophesies edifies the church.
    2. *Bible mentions churches as local churches*
    Act 9:31 Then the churches throughout all Judea, Galilee, and Samaria had peace and were edified. And walking in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Spirit, they were multiplied.
    Act 15:41 And he went through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches.
    Act 16:5 So the churches were strengthened in the faith, and increased in number daily.
    Rom 16:4 who risked their own necks for my life, to whom not only I give thanks, but also all the churches of the Gentiles.
    Rom 16:16 Greet one another with a holy kiss. The churches of Christ greet you.
    1Co 7:17 But as God has distributed to each one, as the Lord has called each one, so let him walk. And so I ordain in all the churches.
    1Co 11:16 But if anyone seems to be contentious, we have no such custom, nor do the churches of God.
    3. *Bible mentions "church = believers".*
    Rom 16:5 Likewise greet the church that is in their house. Greet my beloved Epaenetus, who is the firstfruits of Achaia to Christ.
    1Co 16:19 The churches of Asia greet you. Aquila and Priscilla greet you heartily in the Lord, with the church that is in their house.
    Col 4:15 Greet the brethren who are in Laodicea, and Nymphas and the church that is in his house.
    4. *R Catholics have the wrong definition of Church. To R Catholics, Church meant R Catholic Church which Bible says its Not!*
    you said
    When was Protestantism founded ?

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 роки тому +3

    @Connor Mickelson *Yes until you see R Catholics kneeling before and weeping to statues. Lolol. Just google you will know. This is already a form of worship. Dont you know that Bible?*
    *Good grief you use graven images as decors?*
    you said
    We do not worship the statues they are only used as a decoration in our churches