Why Haven’t We Found Dinosaur and Human Fossils Together?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 жов 2024
- Why haven’t we found dinosaur and human fossils together? In season 2, episode 3 of The Genesis Account of Noah’s Ark, Calvin Smith, a Bible-believing Christian, shares his answer to this question.
This is an episode of our series titled The Genesis Account of Noah’s Ark. You can watch the other episodes of the series here: www.Answers.tv...
What makes people thank that the animals on the Ark were grown, wouldn't it be more practical to have young ones aboard?
Yes, young fertile ones to repopulate the Earth...God did the natural selection in that instance.
exactly
especily looking how big the ark was
Oh, you mean birds?
@@davidgardner863 No...birds lived at the time of dinosaurs and dinosaurs did not evolve from birds.
Without watching my answer is... People wouldn't have been hanging out with dinosaurs.
That’s a good way to look at it
I'm sure you're confused. Man and dinosaurs did not coexist temporally, at the same time or in paleo-proximity, and as a result, they are not found in the same layers during archaeological excavations. The term 'paleo-proximity' refers not to direct physical proximity-as in living and dying next to each other-but to the relative positions within geological or paleontological layers. This clarifies that their fossils are separated by millions of years in the sedimentary record. If you accept that fossils are real things, then you must accept that under no conditions would it be possible to fossilize creature remains in 8,000 years. Not even close.
@@HipstarMusic It was a joke. :)
@@BigBoPete I'm relieved to read that. I promise you, I'll receive responses defending your satirical position from some who literally believe this.
So that kills the idea of human and dinosaur foot prints found together.
Plenty of text of dragons ....dragon =dinosaurs before the word dinosaurs was invented
Bingo 💯
There are also dragoons.
There’s no evidence that Dinosaurs coexisted with humans. Ignorance isn’t good even if your delusion demands it.
where there is none lol
@@pa5287 they were hunted to extinction. Slow moving, lots of meat.
Interest note about The Ashley Phosphate Beds in SC, An enormous phosphate graveyard that contained mixed remains of man with land and sea animals, notably crocodilians, ichthyosaurs, hadrosaurs, plesiosaurs, whales, sharks, zeuglodon, monkeys, rhinos, horses, mastodons, mammoths, porpoises, elephants, deer, pigs, dogs, and sheep.
Nope. You're mixing every time period in those beds into one gigantic fossil. And it isn't. The Ashley Phosphate Beds, located in South Carolina, are a well-known geological formation that has yielded numerous fossils, particularly from the late Cretaceous and early Tertiary periods. Some claims have been made that human and dinosaur fossils have been found together in these beds, suggesting that humans and dinosaurs coexisted. However, these claims are not supported by the mainstream scientific community for several reasons:
1. **Geological Context**: The fossils found in the Ashley Phosphate Beds come from a variety of geological periods. The area has layers from different times, including the Cretaceous (when dinosaurs lived) and the Tertiary (after the extinction of the dinosaurs). This mixing of fossils from different periods can lead to misinterpretations.
2. **Misidentification**: Some fossils claimed to be human have often been misidentified. Fossils can be difficult to interpret, especially when fragmented or incomplete. What may initially appear to be a human bone could often be something else.
3. **Scientific Consensus**: The overwhelming consensus in the scientific community is that non-avian dinosaurs went extinct about 66 million years ago at the end of the Cretaceous period, while anatomically modern humans appeared around 300,000 years ago. This substantial time gap makes coexistence impossible.
4. **Lack of Verifiable Evidence**: No verifiable, peer-reviewed evidence has been published in reputable scientific journals supporting the claim that human and dinosaur fossils have been found together in the Ashley Phosphate Beds or any other location. Such extraordinary claims would require extraordinary evidence, which has not been provided.
In summary, while the Ashley Phosphate Beds are a rich source of fossils, the evidence does not support the idea that humans and dinosaurs lived together. The claims of coexistence are not accepted by the scientific community due to lack of credible evidence and the significant time gap between the existence of non-avian dinosaurs and humans.
@@itmaster3805 mixed top to bottom?
Also mixed with man? No hominid remains have been found in the Americas. I think you've misunderstood what you've heard.
That's accurate. I've got a copy of the original 1881 and 1885 reports from the journals, which also states they threw the human bones in the river. They were only interested in the dinosaur bones. They were displayed in 1885 at a fair in Chicago and New York, as I recall. Transcripts can be provided.
The important point: intermixed.
This catalogue of fossils from the phosphate beds was given in the records of Major Edward Willis who displayed them at multiple expositions (Willis, “Fossils and Phosphate Specimens,” 1881.) Professor F.S. Holmes (paleontologist and curator of the College of Charleston’s Natural History Museum) described the fossil graveyard in a report to the Academy of Natural Sciences:
As follows:
“Remains of the hog, the horse and other animals of recent date, together with *human bones mingled with the bones of the mastodon and extinct gigantic lizards* .” There can be little doubt what extinct gigantic lizard he referenced for he pictured a hadrosaurus on the front of his 1870 book.
The Phosphate Rocks of South Carolina and captioned it: “Skeleton of a Fossil Lizard eighteen feet in Length.”
Moreover, on page 31 of his report, he wrote, “It was in this Post-Pleiocene age, the period when the American Elephant, or Mammoth, the Mastodon, Rhinoceros, Megathereum, Hadrosaurus, and other gigantic quadrupeds roamed the Carolina forests, and repaired periodically to these Salt-lakes.”
Known for 143 years. Quietly ignored.
I know for a fact Noah's flood is true because back in 2002 or 3 I was standing in my living room leaning against my couch and God gave me a vision of Noah standing at the entrance of the ark he looked so proud he had long white hair and a long white beard and he was holding a shepherds staff that curved at the top then I looked down and saw two giraffes two elephants and two rhinos two of every living animal God created going to Noah they stretched out as far as my eyes could see. I told people but they said it was just my imagination. But it is absolutely true !!! I didn't learn about the ark encounter they had built until about two years ago so now I am trying to tell everyone that will listen because people need to repent.!!! I know now that Jesus Christ is the ark !!! I'm praying that God will help share my vision now because God's timing is always perfect. 🙏 In the mighty name of Jesus Christ I pray.AMEN
Sure, that totally happened.
Nurse she's out of her bed again.
I don't think you're crazy you probably did have a vision... Well keep telling your story no matter what others think. If it's YOUR TRUTH. It's funny how people will assume you are crazy bc of believing in the flood when most of them believe in many genders when we can only see ♂️ ♀️
This loving god you speak of, did it drown innocent koala bears over here in Australia?
WHAT HARM DID THEY EVER DO??
@@gknight4719No. The fallen angels and Nephilim had corrupted everything on earth, no longer God's creation. The destruction of corruption was necessary to save the earth and its inhabitants. Your Koalas would have been gigantic and evil, probably cannibalistic. Think on that, then do some reading and research.
We didn't find human remains in the geological record alongside dinosaurs because God said he would wipe out humanity completely except for Noah and his family.
The 1700+++ people aboard and the other 20000 abroad other 13 Ark class live ships rallied up to Noah's side: *existence denied*
Exactly.
Mastadon state park
Your logic doesn’t take into account dinosaurs and man lived together after the flood.
@@CongressSux1776 There'd only be a few fledgling pairs that were taken on the arc. Most of the ones that would have grown large didn't make it through the ensuing ice age. So we got left with crocodiles, turtles etc.
Here in Texas we have a fossil footprint of a dinosaur , beside a HUMAN FOOTPRINT! Yes its real....
No they haven’t.
@@bdawg-qj9bqactually they have
@@bdawg-qj9bq Yes ,
No truth in this. Starting your believe with a lie?
@@BossMr.X It is absolutely true
Not finding human and dinosaur fossils buried together isn’t an argument against their coexistence. We also don’t find coelacanth and whale fossils buried together, but both coelacanth and whale are alive and coexist today. Just like how we have ancient carvings of dinosaurs in places like Carlisle Cathedral (two brass sauropod carvings are on Richard Bell’s tomb, he died in 1496) and Ta Prohm temple in Cambodia (a stone Stegosaurus carving is on one of the walls, completed circa 1200 AD), both proving that man and dinosaur lived together as late as 500 years ago. Dinosaurs are just likely extinct now, just as many other animals have gone extinct in the past several decades/centuries.
Not a fair comparison, whales is one species or however amount of variations,same as coelacanth, dinosaurs ruled the earth there are 700 known dinosaur species and probably thousands more in reality, they were literally everywhere just like human
the blades on that temple "stegosaurus" are border decorations and are present in other panels.
as for your other examples, they are as much evidence of dinos coexisting with humans as the gargoyles adorning medieval cathedrals ae proof of such creatures existing.
birds still exist and they're descended from dinos.
It's not that they are not found geographically close to each other. It is that they are never found in the same rock layers. Dinosaurs are always buried deeper than humans
@@mattbrook-lee7732 But per the aforementioned evidence of the Stegosaur Stone Carving in Cambodia's Ta Prohm Temple and the Sauropod Brass Carving at Carlisle Cathedral, England, Dinosaurs did coexist with humans in the not-too-distant past, as late as 500 years ago. Just because two animals aren't found in the same fossil layers doesn't mean they didn't coexist at some point.
@ryans8081 the stegosaurus carving looks nothing like a stegosaurus. It has a large head and a droopy tail. There are many lizards alive today that look like the pictures in the cathedral. None of this gets anywhere near counting as evidence. Whilst it's not impossible some non avian dinosaurs survived there is no evidence of them in 66 million years of fossils.
Adrian Rogers once explained the difference between evolution and the fairytale. In a fairytale, a princess kisses a frog, and he turns into a prince. In evolution a frog, given enough time will evolve into a prince.
I believe the scriptures support a timeline longer than 6000 years, however it's my belief in Jesus Christ through whom I'm saved that is far more important.
😂
Then you don't follow what Jesus said about the beginning of Creation, He said in the beginning was male and female which means humans were there from the beginning. This completely destroys the whole old age Earth account. If you say the Earth is old then you are saying Jesus is a liar and wasn't sinless by nature.
If the earth was older, then how do you account for the scripture? The genealogy of Adam to king David and to Jesus.
But indeed you are right about Jesus. Because there is only one name given under heaven by which one must be saved.
Then you're calling
Jesus Christ a liar ......
@@nickroberts-xf7oq That's basically what He's saying here in the comments since I don't think he read about the part where Jesus came down to take the place of Adam's original sin.
So the answer to "Why haven't we found dinosaur and human fossils together?" is "Because we haven't found any dinosaur and human fossils together yet."
This is what happens when you spend more time teaching your students about evolutionary theory than critical thinking.
we have found human fossils in supposed 100 million year old dakota sandstone 10 fossils four women a baby and five men ofcourse they dont accept it but its irrefutable
Once the lies of the controlers are revealed and main scheme mee-dee-ah is replaced with real science, it will be game over for the lies, eg "safe and effective" same source, different tenticle.
We did find dinosaur fossils and only dinosaur fossils as humans weren’t around the time dinosaurs, us humans appeared during the rein of mammals during the ice age and before the ice age and after the ice age, and if humans were around the time of the dinosaurs then not only we would be eaten but also killed, but we also struggle to find food as the dinosaurs at the time were big
@mrjohnnyjohnster3940 you can't KNOW that as cen$orschip has the wo6 under THEIR witchcraft.
In Mongolia there is the biggest field of footprints on earth, with multiple dinosaur and human footprints criss crossing and from memory over 100 different types.
Lots of other proof has been relegated to the bin by Smith
Son
Ian's
@tristantorres7511 seek and you will find that Dennis swift shows the ica stones carved by very talented south American Indians riding on, being drawn along in carts and even being eaten by dragons as they were called in the day.
Edit yes you are correct dinosaurs we're called behemoth and the sea and river dwellers leviathan.
See Job 40: 15 through to 41 : 34
If you look into the livescience article and the incident surrounding what was found. One scholar refuted that it wasn’t a pterosaur at all but rather it was one larger single fish fossil
In Glen Rose, Texas, there are fossilized dinosaur footprints in the river and creek beds throughout the area, most of which are concentrated in Dinosaur Valley State Park. In many places, people have found fossilized human footprints alongside and even inside the dinosaur footprints.
So true...
they are footprints we have all probably walked by the remains of something extinct at one point
Those are NOT "human " footprints.
yes they are@@walkergarya
Thank you, I was hoping someone was going to mention that, so I didn’t have to.
Well, people, then and now, would likely not be hanging out with Dinosaurs.
So why are there carvings & etchings in almost all know civilisations all around the world that shows man walked with dinosaurs.I’ve lost count with pictures.👍🏻Cheers.
@@martinwolrich6464 give me some examples
Dinosaurs came in all shapes and sizes. They were all over the place. Humans would have been in regular contact with at least small dinosaurs if they lived at the same time.
@@martinwolrich6464 Citations needed.
@@ABC_Master... I've seen several, the one I do remember is that bas relief carving on an Asian temple many thousands of years old. It seems to look exactly like a stegosaurus.
Because dinosaurs chewed their food really well?🤷
... I think I'll go ahead and watch the video now.
I still have a question that If the Flood killed all living humans, except Noah's family, then why have we never found Human fossils from that time period. There should have been quite a few yet not one has ever been documented that can be attributed to the flood.
I recall that there are actually many fossils discovered that are from the before the flood. Consider, for example, the human fossil discovered in solid stone at the copper mine in Utah. The stone the human skeleton was found in is millions of years older than the human, according to the flawed thinking of most scientists.
That man's fossil is green from the copper. Thought that was a neat fun fact!
P.S. Just in case my first comment is forcefully hidden on the site, I made mention of the human fossil in the Utahn copper mine's ancient stone.
I would suggest that they are crushed into fossil fuel. Ash is a catalyst to fossilize. Coat has great evidence of being of a young earth. They found a cup embedded into a so called 300 million year old piece of coal. Dinosaur Dave has some interesting facts. They also found Dinosaur bones with soft tissue. 65 million years= Wrong.
New York has more people now than the entire population living in the world two three thousands years ago. We reached a billion recently
No one likes brainwashing
Actually, Cal Smiith could be a superb actor. He sounds so amazingly convincing, even when he's spouting such complete nonsense. Missed his vocation.
Make a science point if you can.
@@sliglusamelius8578 Fair point, unfortunately I’m too lazy, partly because there are a colossal number of science points I could make, and partly because the religious community would find a way to construe them to support their view. Scientists call it “torturing the data until it confesses”. I imagine the religious community would know how to do that, having learnt from the Inquisition.
@@richardmackay4369
You do have your prejudices. First thing is that the Inquisition was limited to Spain, and resulted in max 3000 dead. It was not good, but it also had the benefit of giving the accused a trial, an improvement over the vigilante justice common in those days.
The more important point is that the Scientific Revolution happened in Christian Europe. Off the top of my head, Isaac Newton, Galileo, Copernicus, Kepler, Mendel, Lavoisier, Dalton, Maxwell, Faraday, Heisenberg, Lemaitre, Leibnitz Van Leeuwenhoek were all Christian believers. Your accomplishments are what exactly???.
@@sliglusamelius8578 I’m glad of your courtesy, particularly responding to my barbed comment. There were Inquisitions in previous times to the Spanish eg Mediaeval (starting in France); Roman, Portuguese, so to say there was only a Spanish is wrong. ‘Only’ 3000 people died, no doubt relieved they got a trial, do you mean we shouldn’t be concerned by that 3000? All Inquisitions were famed for more or less torture, but it was a common secular practise at the time, so I’m commenting less on the torture and more on the fact that they were religiously inspired. Non - believers are often also unable to grasp why God - apparently a benevolent chap - would agree to this. Newton spent many years trying to transmute metals. Kepler spent a lot of time on Astrology. Galileo was forced to recant by the Church! Your examples of truly remarkable people, who had some connection to Christianity, illustrates that it’s a history of real people and nothing to do with that Christianity. It’s an example of what I said at first - some persons will construe whatever they hear to support their preconcieved ideas. No, I cannot boast amazing achievements and it’s too late now to try.
There, I got sucked in to a discussion after all, even though I knew full well I would convince no one.
@@richardmackay4369
Galileo died a full-fledged believer. The entire affair was orchestrated as much by his enemies within the science establishment of astronomers as by the pope, who had no idea whom to believe. Galileo was apparently wrong about many of his ideas, and had no proof, and was not the first to posit a heliocentric model. The situation was more complex than the storyline we have been fed.
As for the inquisition, no I don't defend it, it was horrendous, but by which moral code do we judge it? The atheist moral code? The one that puts humans on the same ontological level as animals? Or the Christian one that finds it atrocious to mistreat souls who are cherished by God the Creator?
Atheistic communism is responsible for 150 million deaths in the last 200 years.
The point about the scientific revolution is that the Christian milieu of Europe promoted inquiry into the natural world, so as to elucidate the workings of God. Newton saw it that way. He was a genius. Many of the giants of the scientific revolution were Christians. Look it up!!
Jeremiah 49:33 And Hazor shall be a dwelling for dragons, and a desolation for ever; there shall no man abide there, nor any son of man dwell in it.
Could you have possibly picked a more random off-topic line of scripture?????????????????????????????
Where is that, Antarctica? Seems like the Lord would dump the ice and rock on the worst of places where the most evil resided, or as far away from Noah that he remains safe in the ark.
The dragon of desolation= desolation.
That shows no evidence that Dinosaurs are being described. You’re taking words literally.
@@INTJ10551 Job 40, Job 41 , Isaiah 27
Because they’re 64 million years apart. 👍🏻
I am curious, if all animals lived together, all at the same time, how did lions, bears, terror birds, large raptors, small/young tyrannosaurs, allosaurids, gorgonops, dilophosaurus, and dimetriodons all fill the same niche at the same time? Just one extra apex predator (pythons) can destroy an ecosystem like in the Florida Everglades. How could all of these live at the same time??
If they did find them together, do you think they wouldn't cover it up ?
Why would they do that?
@@mattbrook-lee7732 for the same reason why there have been so many "missing link" hoaxes.......
@@mattbrook-lee7732Yes, bee cause it's a job. Ate Theist sea scientist as these holy pea pole teaching truth two the world, but scientist are under a pay roll. Meaning, day are extinction of the money givers. Day don't do or reveal what day wont two.
Example - millions of dollars are paid two find Ed -v dent for neo darwinism. If a scientist under the pay toll brings proof of dinosaur width men, heal bee fired bee cause he was ant paid two find Ed v dents against neo darwinism. That's scientist wood cover it up,So he Ken feed hisses family.
It's like paying a engineer two create you a boat, but day build a air plane bee cause day think is better. The engineer wood get fired bee cause he was ant paid two do that.
Yes, bee cause it's a job. Millions are sent to find evidence of neo darwinism, but if you bring evidence against it, you wheel bee fired. You have two do what you are paid two do. ate theist bee leave scientist are pea pole hear two tell truth two the world,but it's a job like inn knee other. Day wheel cover it up two feed their families. Scientist are extinction of their payers. Day don't do what day wont two do or reveal two the world what they won't two reveal.
Yes, they 100 purr cent wood. Aye explained this inn detail,but the platform took down my comets six times. Atheist don't under stand how the science job works.
100s of Millions of years?🤣 That alone sounds so goofy😂😂😂
@@kennykunkel943 It's called evidence, none for creation, tonnes for evolution and "old" earth.
@@kennykunkel943 excellent !
@@bobwilkinson2008 So you believe that nothing created everything ? wheres the science in that ?
I believe the Gospel of John , That Jesus is Ho theos , the Creator of everything
I believe God Loves you and me and he has has given us his Son Jesus to be our Redeemer and Savior if we will put our complete trust in him . I've trusted Jesus , He has saved my soul.
I have come to understand that I am a sinner . Jesus is my Savior . Jesus loves you Bob , trust him and be saved from what is coming , Jesus is the only way
@@jwsanders1214 Who said nothing created everything? No one. But, you're saying some magical sky fairy did it all, even though there's no evidence of that but there is mountains of evidence of how we evolved and are also beginning to see how life first started.
@@bobwilkinson2008 In the Beginning there was Nothing , then it exploded !
Creation can't be replicated . Everything is taken by Faith . You have chosen to believe that this marvelous universe we find ourselves in came about by random chance , all the wonders like the eye , ear , animals , oceans , Humming Birds , atmosphere , The wonder of Male and Female , conception and birth are the product of unlimited Time and Chance .
I don't have enough Faith to be an atheist. I Trust Jesus
I have come to understand that God loves you and me and he has made it so easy for us to make it to Heaven and bypass Hell . Simply Trust Jesus and accept the free gift of Salvation that he offers you . It costs you nothing , He has purchaced it for you with his Blood
Thank you for making these videos.
Please help me understand this argument better, that it might be more useful to me.
I would have thought that, if the great flood created a large number of the now-observed fossils, then any given group of fossils should nearly always contain a wide mix of organisms, including humans, because -all- of the living humans, and -all- of the other land dwelling creatures and plants (except those in the ark) were killed and fossilized together within a very small window of time.
People had already congregated into cities by the time of the great flood, so perhaps the chances of finding a human fossil vary greatly depending on location? The world is large, so perhaps we just aren’t looking in the right place?
On the other hand, it would also seem that there would be fossil beds with high concentrations of humans along with domesticated animals and plants; created when civilizations were consumed by the waters. Perhaps cities and farms tend to be located in places unlikely to fossilize? Or perhaps they tend to get buried so deep that they aren’t likely to be found? Perhaps new cities exist on top of the fossilized ones, preventing their excavation?
Also, if the great flood is responsible for creating most of the fossils we see today, I do not understand why the vast majority of fossils found would be of marine life. While the great flood may have disrupted marine environments so much as to kill many marine organisms, the death of all land creatures was explicitly universal.
I would very much appreciate your insight to be better prepared to meet these objections.
Thanks again.
Those are great questions. Some of them are answered in many videos, not just the ones from answers in genesis.
on top of that it should be considered that the bible only describes two original humans, but many animals, and the population growth of most animals is much faster than for humans, so by the time of the flood there must have been exponentially more animals than humans, and with humans typically living densely in cities and urban areas that most animals stay far away from, it shouldn't be a surprise that humans and dinosaurs haven't been found fossilized together.
oh, and humans tend to have a certain ability called boat building, so most people or at least a large portion probably survived in hastily made boats for a while after the flood started before being killed by the catastrophic weather and volcanic activity
Scott,
The globe is too big to get everything mixed up the way that argument describes.
Things sink too fast to go far enough to get mixed with very much that is even a short distance away.
When you throw a ball 30mph how far does it go before it hits the ground?
95% + of all fossils are marine organisms.
That’s because of the way the sediment was piled onto the land.
One of the most curious things about the Flood is that all of the pre existing land seems to be stripped completely down to basement rock.
That’s because the continents broke apart and slid across the ocean floor scooping sediment like a shovel being pushed across the ground. The result is scouring like an abrasive pad.
it’s note worthy that cambrian strata tends to be close to the Northern and western shorelines of North America, but largely absent further inland.
That’s because NA moved toward the Northwest after breaking apart.
A lot of the objections are just nonsensical assumptions that are not based in reality and don’t understand what events actually transpired.
Let’s be glad we don’t find many human fossils, and virtually none associated with the Flood.
My personal opinion is that most land animals and people lived in well vegetated land so they would more likely be with coal deposits if they could be found at all.
Otherwise, the water was moving from Northwest to Southeast so most animals would be swept the opposite direction that the continents were moving.
particularly around the mid atlantic ridge where the split occurred.
You wont find the answers because there was never a global flood. Human remains can't fossilize because it takes millions of years to do that. And there is no magical sky god creating then killing life.
Humans are intelligent, mobile and can swim. Anyone not killed by the breaking open of the fountains of the deep would have sought out higher ground and started gathering as much food as they could. If driven together with animals they would have fought off any predators, then survived as long as they could on the meat. Finally they would have started swimming where they would have become a meal for surviving predators in the oceans. This means that there likely weren't many human fossils to begin with. Plus which about 70% of the planet is still covered by water. As far as I know there are no archaeological digs taking place in the ocean.
I recommend watching “The Ark and the Darkness”…it’s on YT. Very well done, and thought-provoking.
I'm surprised you didn't mention the times that mammal and dinosaur fossils were found together, like the footprint of a dinosaur in hardened mud over a human footprint.
And another guy says that it’s because they didn’t live near each other.
Those are NOT "human " footprints.
@@walkergarya What is it?
@@CoolPaDuke They are the foot prints of other dinosaurs. The distance between each print is too far to be human, the depth of each print is the same as the other prints showing the weight of the animal was greater than a human.
@@walkergarya I didn't know there were dinosaurs with feet that looked exactly like human feet.
Okay I’m a Catholic and a creationist, but I’m also a lifelong Dinosaur and paleontology enthusiast. I need answers about the rock layers, not individual fossil sites. The Hell Creek and Morrison formations, for example, represent two completely separate ecosystems which overlap in the same region, and no two species are the same in either rock layer. Human and modern mammal fossils are similarly found in completely different layers than dinosaurs, with no overlap. I need an explanation for that because it definitely seems to contradict the idea of only 1500 years between creation and the flood.
Because that idea is wrong. Study more about pollen deposition and its relationship to Stokes Law. Further, there are huge numbers of igneous formations that intrude into sedimentary formations and the amount of heat released during their cooling further falsifies the tales of Genesis as literal events. Rather read it as a metaphor, written by people who could not understand their world in anything but the terms they had available to them at that time.
Note that none of what I said indicates "god does not exist". I just say that a literal interpretation of the Bible is just flat-out wrong and harmful.
Unfortunately they ignore evidence that doesn't fit their narrative. Look up the haymond formation, 15000 layers of sand and shale (with animal burrows in the shale) and YEC won't even attempt explaining it.
Check out professor Walter veith evolutionist to creationist. 😉
@@WholisticWomen-wl2sy And he specifically ignores Stokes Law and the heat problem as well as pollen and ostracods. He's in it for the money and people pay him. This is what a good education does - makes you pay attention to details. He hopes you'll ignore them while he plays to your preconceived notions. So?
NEXT!
Congratulations. You have a brain.
so where are the human fossils? that's what I want to know. I don't care if they are suppose to be together or not. I just want to know where the human fossils are? I mean I am a creationist and not an evolutionist so I just want to know, why are there no human fossils. I don't want to give an explanation that doesn't get to the point. some people just want to know where they are. so where are they? Have they been found anywhere? anywhere at all?
First of all, how do you know if they are or aren't together?.. I don't trust the scientists either, I am also a creationist.. and the powers that be, manipulate what is told to the public.. btw, the "dragons" of old could have been dinosaurs.. and remember Genesis 6 and the book of Enoch..
This has been covered. The humans were not dumb anmails. And just stand there and be covered. Remember it rained for 40 days. The tried to save themselves. But ended up dieing. Only a few were covered by settlement. And yes we have found some. But they like to call them cave men haha. The rest were eaten. After the fall. Sharks started eating meat bunch of dead human flowing around dinner time. There you go sir glad to help. Preacher and wifey from Humboldt CA Jesus is God
@@sscot720
Why not trust scientists...?
They are the only ones objectively searching for anwsers.
Look up Lucy human fossil. I believe it’s the oldest human ancestors. Technically the species is Australopithecus Afrensis.
@@amfgoe255 and they lived 6,000 years ago?
The problem is being misrepresented (on purpose). It is not "why haven't we found dinosaurs and human fossils together?". It is "why do we never find dinosaur and human remains in the same geological strata? IF they coexisted, we should be able to find their remains is the same strata that represent the time of their coexistence, no matter where on earth (I.e., no matter how geographically separated they are). -And we don't.
This is assuming that the different strata anywhere on earth indicate a different time from the past.
@@sozoswan5954 If you don't believe that different strata represents different times (even if by days or weeks) you still end with the same problem, now exacerbated because even Young Earth Creationists believe that e.g. coal layers - wherever they be - represent the same time/event.
@@kurtdejgaard I think it’s pretty easy to understand that months, weeks or days are vastly different than millions or hundreds of thousands of years, yeah?
@@sozoswan5954 No! -Even to Young Earth Creationists, a coal seam is a coal seam and represents a forrest covered in silt from flood-mud, no matter if it's a 5 meter's depth or 1km depth (like the coal in e.g. Scotland). Timeline is fixed to them, no matter what - there is nothing to "understand", when it is dictated to you. It is an "answer" you are not allowed to question!
@@kurtdejgaard Good luck educating the unwilling. *edit; maybe a little rude, sozoswan5954 actually seemed like he was trying to use reasoning to reach his conclusions. It's a start.
Australian Aboriginal culture gives an older and more accurate depiction of creation then the bible.
no real geologist/paleontologist thinks that modern mammals like beavers/ducks were found in the fossil records of dinosaurs. There may be some unusual shifted layers of sediments from earthquakes or similar but this would be explainable. Also there is plenty of interpretation room on genesis 2 for a creation of older earth eras.
Is there ANY validity, when someone asks why no human and dinosaur fossils have been found together, in answering with a speculative “not yet”?
No
No there’s not anything to support this man’s bewildering statement. Honestly anyone defending this video whatsoever are as naive as the man literally claimed
Not if you're basing your entire hypothesis on speculation that it might happen one day
@@IanM-id8or Have you bothered to watch the video at all? I doubt that you have. Y' might want to watch a video before trying to comment on it or answer any questions regarding it.
A related question - why do vast layers of Cambrian and Ordovician limestone and sandstone have no vertebrates in them at all? Stratigraphy looks like there were long periods of living things that existed long there were marine vertebrates, much less terrestrial tetrapods.
Que? Ordovician strata does indeed have many vertebrate fossils of the earliest fish. The Cambrian has fossils of the basal vertebrate ancestors, namely _Pikaia_ and _Haikouichthys._
Layers, we don't have to show you no stinking layers.
The layer do NOT INDICATE millions or billions of years, but were laid over hours days, weeks, months during the year-long Biblical Flood.
@@zumbinisgm If all the strata were deposited at the same time why don't they all show the same radiometric age? Even if that age is wrong why do we get over 3 billion years' worth of variation from the bottom to the top?
@@samburns3329. Because it’s faulty.
My family lived in Acambaro, GTO, Mexico. - look up Acambaro dinosaur figures. People try and claim they are fabrications; but, they've never been proven false.
Have they been proven true?
@@brendankeith249 Erle Stanley Gardner of Perry Mason fame (a former LA DA), went down to Acambaro Mexico in the 1950's to investigate the 10's of thousands of twice baked figurines found in the area. Many of them were of anatomically correct dinosaurs. As the figurines were being dug up from clay beds at the base of a nearby mountain...Gardner wanted to see if he could prove that they were legitimate. He wound up digging up the foundation of a home in Acambaro that belonged to the towns police chief and found figurines there. That home had been built some 40 or 50 years earlier as I recall. Since many of the town buildings were made of adobe...he also found fragments of the dinosaur figurines in the adobe of town building exteriors. Gardner believed the figures to be genuine artifacts. He wrote about it in his book "The Host with the Big Hat". Dr Don Patton has done work on this. Of further interest may be the Peruvian Ica Burial stones found by the Conquistadors in the early 1500's Peru. They depicted man and dinosaurs interacting as well.
I looked it up. They are modern fakes. Some even resemble aliens and flying saucers.
@@brendankeith249 evidence points to it.
@@brendankeith249 Erle Stanley Gardner of Perry Mason fame, who was also a former Los Angeles Cty DA investigated these figurines in the 1950s and found them to be legitimate even finding parts of some of the figurines in the adobe building in town. He wrote about it in the Host with the Big Hat..
I believe the Word of God. I reject evolution.
Which god? Zeus? Odin? Osiris? Shiva? Quetzalcoatl?
@@wottermelon4060 The True God.
@@wottermelon4060you guys always say this despite knowing exactly what we mean it’s just funny at this point.
@@halodude4481 You know what's funny? A grown up actually thinking people and dinosaurs coexisted when they are in fact separated by about 65 million years. That's funny.
@@halodude4481its a serious question, humans for thousands of years have been creating gods. Living and dying FOR those gods, while claiming that they are the TRUE gods.
You CANNOT all be right..
But you CAN all be wrong. 😂
Here is what we have found in different geological layers: Species are wholly different and increasingly complex from bottom to top regardless of size.
Do we find many human remains in elephant graveyards?
or Elephants in human graveyards ?
Well if there was I’m sure The museum of natural history probably covered it all up
Yeah, it’s all a big conspiracy.
For sure...300 years of natural sciences, thousands and thousands of scientists from every branch and discipline are all in a giant conspiracy to cover up what they really know...that a god who could only think of cursing, drowning, burning, murder, genocide and human sacrifice is actually the creator of everything,😂😂😂😂
Waste of energy, they sure can't fool you, now can they.
I am trying to figure out why it's so important to think one thing or another.
@@kayakMike1000 Because the evolutionary naturalism view insistently denies the Biblical revelation and truth about the history of the Earth.
@@zumbinisgm I denies Jack and the bean stalk too.
Please provide a list of your sources for this video.
"just my imagination once again,
ran away with me.
it was just my imagination
runnin' away with me"
old song lyrics. sorry, i couldn't resist.
Da Bible...
DUH!!1!
What a great time to educate people with a lack of knowledge about evolution. Why do you care if they have sources? Naivety is not evil. The people simply need an education.
@@throgmortonartstudio2402 "Why do you care if they have sources?... The people simply need an education."
Sounds like you need an education.
I had the same question, however it came from genuine curiosity while living in Faith through God's grace.
*There is no evidence of spear, knife or arrow cuts on dinosaur bones, as with mammoths! No evidence of dinosaur cooking hearths as with mammoths. No burnt dinosaur bones as with mammoths. Not hut houses built with dinosaur bones as with mammoths. No dinosaur paintings in caves. No massive dinosaur entrapment kill zones like Lehner Mammoth-Kill Site is in southern Arizona (Cochise County) where dozens of Mammoths were mass slaughtered for food. Dinosaurs were mass killing each other a hundred million years before the claimed Adam & Eve brought death into the world by eating the wrong piece of fruit. Isn't it wiser to place faith in things which have evidence? Where is the evidence the substance of things you hope for & the evidence of your god not seen? If there isn't any, how is it different from the folly of pseudo faith? If living a dogma causes harm to another, how is it righteousness??*
Don't forget marine life fossils getting found on higher ground. That helps support the flood explanation.
Marine fossils formed on the beds of ancient seas. Millions of years later plate tectonics lifted the beds with the fossil to much higher elevations. Science has known that for a century which is probably why creationists haven't heard about it yet.
@@samburns3329 exactly. I was going to say just that but you beat me to the punch. Sea fossils are found high up in the Himalayas. Happened when India collided with Asia and forced the mountains upwards.
@@samburns3329 Only of the 'millions of years ago' narrative was true. Is that why our alleged shared common 'ape like ancestors' found remains allegedly from 'millions of years ago' aren't very different to ape kingdom examples around today?
@@samburns3329 "which is probably why creationists haven't heard about it yet."
what, you are trying to make a creationist mad?
@@samburns3329 Again, in the event of UA-cam not notifying you of posts, Only if the 'millions of years ago' narrative was true. Is that why our alleged shared common 'ape like ancestor's' found remains allegedly from 'millions of years ago' aren't very different to ape kingdom examples around today? Where's your supporting evidence, evidence that hasn't came from career 'evolutionists'?
“I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science..."
"It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaws and holes as sound parts.” -C. Darwin
Any idea what he was referring to or the context? If not you shouldn't use the quote. If you do know then you are deliberately misusing it
Darwin probably said this while frustrated with the classification of barnacles. Not to mention he had no idea about genetics, DNA, and the selfish gene theory. His theory was correct but he didn't know exactly why.
Ah, typical creationist quote-mining. As per usual, creationists are liars.
Darwin never said or wrote this as written here. Both sentences are from separate letters. It was never a single quote as written here. Also both letters were written before he wrote origin of species.
Creationists just can't come up with anything true to say so they just keep on lying
@@mattbrook-lee7732 he was referring to plant evolution. And notice your reply was not to provide observable examples of how roses evolve into sunflowers.
2:20 why would humans and dinosaurs have to be buried together. do you think they colonized amongst each other in harmony. do you think neither of them preyed on each other? what is it about human survival history that you don't understand
"What is it... you don't understand?"
Let me answer for him.
"Every single thing that my bible doesn't explain."
Dinos lived everywhere on the globe
@@LDrosophila Right, just in different strata of rock layers than humans.
When creation fell in the Garden and sin & death entered the world, everything started dying and extinction of species started.
It’s very likely that all dinosaur species were already extinct by the time of the Flood.
In the paper, published April 18 in the journal Nature, the researchers speculate that the coelacanth's relatively unchanged deep-sea habitat, and an apparent lack of predation over thousands to millions of years, means this ancient fish didn't need to change much to survive. (See more pictures of deep-sea creatures.)
Question should be this...
If dinosaurs are older than man..And man has been on the planet for millions of years, where are all the fossils of humans?
We have found human fossils, fossils are really rare most are gone no trace, dinosaurs ruled over 140milliom years, def way more than human, the amount of fossils we found probably less than 0.1%
Many human foscils have been found. They just don't talk about them in relation to dinosaurs because it would disprove their pet theory.
Humans one species dinosaurs have 700 known species and probably thousands more in reality consider they dominated earth for over 140milliom years compare to humans 200k-2m years. Way more dinosaurs population than human, and of course there are human fossils found
@@stevebomonster huh?
@@stevebomonster oh sorry it was in my alerts and I didn't notice it was for someone else. Sorry for butting in.
Carl Bach has a museum in Glen Rose Texas that has a dinosaur foot print and a human foot print together in rock.
It's Carl Baugh, not Bach. You're talking about the known fraud Alvis Delk "Flintstone" carving with the anatomically impossible Fred Flintstone foot added to a real theropod fossil track. 🙂
@@OgdenCrimmcramer8162 Yes. Creationists just repeat the same lies over and over, even after they've been debunked.
@@MrHominid2U One guy makes a mistake and it is all you have against creationists lol. That is your evidence?
@@paulmerritt2484 The spelling mistake in this case is just an indication of sloppiness and unseriousness. The REAL mistake is citing a KNOWN FORGERY with a fake human footprint and calling that evidence.
@paulmerritt2484 What is my evidence for what? Creationists have no evidence to support any of their claims and the fact they continue to repeat claims that were thoroughly debunked tells me they they are either delusional or liars. If you're asking for evidence of an ancient Earth or evolution that would take too many volumes to fit in a comments section & you'd just ignore all of it anyway.
Wow. Checkmate. Very impressed with this one. God bless.
The sarcasm in this comment is awesome!
@@CB-THE-OG Wasn't even joking. This was really how I thought 🤷♂️
A Harvard-led study indicates that Earth’s early ocean could have been one to two times larger than the current ocean volume.
These calculations are based on the interior water storage capacity of the planet, which includes the water bound to minerals in the Earth’s mantle.
Researchers compiled data from scientific literature on minerals that contain oxygen and hydrogen atoms (the chemical equivalents of water) and used these figures to estimate the mantle’s water storage capacity.
Implications:
In extreme scenarios, if the primordial ocean were two times larger than today’s ocean, it might have completely flooded the land masses on the early Earth.
While modern Earth’s surface is approximately 70 percent water-covered, this research suggests that our planet was a true ocean world billions of years ago
The whole idea that Creation is 6000 years old is based on faulty math. Fact is that Creation is billions of years old and this in no way interferes with my belief in God . . . Creation billions of years in the making still glorifies God!
This only means that your God is not the same as the Christian or Jewish God. Creationism and Evolution are not provable, and both require Faith in. In my opinion, it is easier to believe Genisis 6000 years God's creation than the Earth and animals being around for a billion of years. Thats a lot of hoops to jump. There is a DNA study out reversed the population human genes and proved today's population mathematically aligns with the Bible. Science does not always get things right and not all Scientist believe or agree with the Same Science.
There’s so much mental gymnastics going on here.
A nice outline before the documentary story would be helpful ☝
Mental gymnastics only happens here huh? … please
@scorpionnemo what? Who said that? Just bc this guy reaches for crazy conclusions based on nothing, doesn't mean there aren't mental gymnastics going on elsewhere. Do you think that the world has a quota of 1 person at a time reaching for ridiculous conclusions?
the earth is old and dinosaurs were already dead and gone before humans came a long that's why their not in the same strata old earth creation is the correct view.
@@diamondlife-gi7hg yep
It's also really interesting to see in our generation that animals are coming to humans for help. They do not need to be taught this. They instinctively know to come to us. We surely are their guardians. Just like the animals went to Noah, so it shall also be in the last days.
There's a video of an Orangutan using a medicinal herb like natives would to heal a wound on its eye and people say this is evidence of evolution in progress. Orangutans are extremely smart and have been observing humans for millenia at this point. A few have even learned to spear fish this way using broken sticks. It means they are smart, that's it! Crows can use basic tools to open cage doors and reach certain things. Parrots and some other birds can mimic language. None of this is proof of evolution!
Let’s see how things go when a tiger comes at you “for help”. 🤦🏻♂️
there's literally videos of that already.. bad example to try and refute the poster.
@@BornAgain223 How often and how many? These are extremely uncommon occurrences relative to simply being attacked by tigers. The poster is suggesting all animals instinctively know to come to us for help. While I don’t dispute the fact that some have, I would expect they are relatively few outside of domesticated animals.
Utter nonsense. Animals generally try to stay well away from humans
Are they just going to not talk about how there were plenty of cave paintings of dinosaurs???
What are these cave paintings?
@@davidchalmers2504 The Egyptians, among many others, depicted mythical creatures in their art, none of which appear in the paleontological record. Artistic representations alone don't confirm the existence of these creatures. Just as we don’t take every mythical depiction as historical fact, we shouldn't interpret ancient art or cave drawings as evidence for dinosaurs coexisting with humans
@@HipstarMusic Hey, I’m with you. I’m a firm believer in the theory of evolution and the 65 million year gap between man and dinosaur. I was only curious as to this person’s examples.
@@davidchalmers2504 I was following up your question to the poster. I didn't mean to direct my response toward you. Sorry if it appeared that way.
@@davidchalmers2504 Well then perhaps you can explain why soft dinosaur tissue containing blood vessels, blood cells, collagen and even partial DNA has been found at dig site on five continents....if you know the secret to how such tissues can survive for 65+ million years ..especially when they have been found mere feet from the surface where solar radiation and weather has been degrading them...please contact the American Red Cross..they would be interested in such blood preservation.
Perhaps the dinosaurs were wiped out in the 1st flood, not the flood of Noah (the 2nd flood). Read 2nd Peter 3:5&6
There was a civilization before Adam & Eve, read Jeremiah 4 & Ezekiel 28
Human and dinosaur prints have been found together.
Shame the human ones were faked.
Can someone seriously explain what the animals would have eaten after they got off the ark, specifically the carnivores. Also how did kangaroos get to Australia or any marsupial for that matter?
There were 14x herds and flock animals than carnivores all of them could survive on plants though carnivores don’t prefer to.
And continental drift and land bridges which would have disappeared over time and at the end of the ice age following the global flood. Hope this helps.
@@DaysofElijah317fish, eggs, anything that was being produced on board the ark. The Lord always supplies every need.
There may have been some dead animals God purposely left on the surface for the carnivores to eat.
It’s not explainable. That’s why we know it’s fiction.
@@bdawg-qj9bq bdawg, there is no fiction in the Holy Bible at all. It is all the words of God.
Aight so just started the video, may I please see the sources he's drawing the claim from about modern animals being found in old rock layers?
There have been over 400 mammals found with dinosaur remains...most of their remains look like their modern day counterparts. This is can be readily looked up.
Go back and watch the 2 previous videos.
@@shannaconda3434 he doesn't give any examples there either. There are none
I think my last comment might've been flagged for posting so many links, so ya might have to google these ones to find the information he's referencing:
110 Million Year Old Duck/Loon:
NY Times: Duck Look Alike Reveals Bird Evolution
164 Million Year Old Jurassic "Beaver":
Nature International Weekly Journal of Science: Jurassic Beaver Swims Into View
(The fossil shown in the video is 10k to 50k years old:
Smithsonian Magazine: Why Did These Human-Sized Beavers Go Extinct During the Last Ice Age?)
125 Million Year Old Badger Like Creature:
National Public Radio: This fossil of a mammal biting a dinosaur captures a death battle's final moments
120 Million Year Old Platypus:
ABC News: Fossil suggests platypus lived in dinosaur times
(The fossil model shown in the video is a model of a platypus 5 million to 25 million years old:
Cairns Aquarium in Australia: Model of the Riversleigh Platypus)
140 Million Year Old Pine:
Geology Page: Oldest pine fossils reveal fiery past
160 Million Year Old Squirrel/Lemur Like Creature:
Science News: Fossils push back origins of modern mammals
The articles about the duck, beaver, and platypus are from the video @shannaconda3434 mentioned, but everything else I had to reverse image search. I'm not sure why he used the young fossils of beavers and platypuses in the video, but he's still speaking truthfully that these kinds of animals did exist during the time of dinosaurs. Keep in mind when he says modern animals, he means modern kinds of animals, not species.
My theory is that dinosaurs didn't have body fat therefore they sank and were covered up. Humans had body fat and floated and did not get rapidly covered. Human bodies just rotted properly also nibble on by aquatic animals. Bones would have just sank and dissolve over time. Even now human bones don't last long in water.
goddammit...
godfuckingdammit...
There's no way you're serious...
@@robertraab I don't know you , but I don't like you
I saw the caption and I couldn't bring myself to watch because the evolutionists will NEVER be right.
Thank you for giving great arguments against those whinny godless evolutionists!
The question never was "why humans and dinosaurs not found together", but why no humans have been ever found IN THE SAME GEOLOGICAL LAYER.
If all of the fossil record reflected a global flood, we would find humans and other modern animals all over the layers.
Yet we can only observe very specific types of animals in each layer, representing what evolutionary theory would predict.
We find that modern animals only found in layers measured to be relatively young, and as we move down to older layers the more different fossils become.
We can also find that some animal groups like the non-avian dinosaurs do not appear in ANY LAYERS younger than 66 million years, if the dating methods were all wrong, and it was caused by a flood, there would be no cut off point to where dinosaurs could be found.
But we don't have to go back to the time of the dinosaurs, just show me a Homo Sapiens from a layer dated to 30 million years ago.
That would completely turn over the evolutionary paradigm of human evolution.
Bro xD You are the wrong section of the internet for this. People here belive! They don´t need facts : p Don´t try to feed them common sense are scietific data please!
Did you even watch the video? Guess not.
Because dinosaurs died out about 65,000,000 years before humans existed.
which is a bit weird considering 100's, I believe now 1000's of examples of Dragon/Dinasaur soft tissue and blood cells have been found. Takes a whole lot of faith to believe its 65,000,000 years old.
@@atyt11 The "soft tissue" is fossilised too - a different preservation process. It is extremely rare. Mary Shwietzer is on public record as saying that evangelicals and pastors are misrepresenting and distoring her work (a polite wa of saying...they are lying about it)
What about South Carolina where they reported finds of fossils of whales, dinosaurs, sea creatures, human, all kinds in the same layer? They have been busy mining out the area for farm fertilizers, etc ever since (can't have too many being reported after all, the news might get out.) Also there is their footprints together found in several places together including the US. One print even had a dinodude stepping into/overlapping a human footprint.
No they never found dinosaurs or humans. But if you want to fall for creationist nonsense, fill your boots
@@mattbrook-lee7732 I've seen some of them and anyone can look up the plateaus of Turkmenistan. Try doing some research Mr nonsense.
@@markhaseley3304 like I said. Fill your boots. Nobody cares
@@mattbrook-lee7732 lol, okay you don't care about science, archaeology, and facts from fraud, scams, misidentification, lies, etc. Gotcha. Enjoy your beliefs and tall tales
@@markhaseley3304 👍
The "Story of the Coelacanth's Lung" sounds amazingly like a "flood event story" to me. All of the key elements - the stress on the predator causing it to regurgitate, the lung being "fresh", the pterosaurs trying to eat and - and being buried with it by a catastrophic event - all sound like a string of events that happened during the flood. The only part the evolutionists left out was the actual flood, and the date they give is of course very wrong.
I don't think mankind was well travelled and spread out much over the world before the Flood, whereas animals probably multiplied quickly and spread out very fast.
Why would they be so much quicker? And who put the humans in the other parts of the globe who were already there when the tribes of the middle east went travelling?
they litterally found dinosaur and human footprints together in the same layers but have been covered up.
You find photos of this in mainly archaeology books and mags. Also rock art portrayal of one I have seen in one of my books.
Another thing, the Bible mentions the Leviathan, as well as a period before Adam and Eve the way I understand. What was, is, and will be according to the Bible!!!!!
Covered up? And yet you know about it. How do you suppose that happened?
@@lenawagner6405, An elephant.
This is the Paluxy River in Glen Rose, Texas. The documentary was 'Footprints In The Stone', I believe. The main fossil in question, that of a human footprint superimposed over a dinosaur track, was tragically chiselled out and lost to fossil collectors, as were many of the surrounding fossilized tracks. This loss prevents detailed analysis using modern scientific methods on the actual fossils, and limits such investigations to reviewing the old photographs and videos, which cannot be scientifically rigorous or definitive.
So the lack of mentioning this is very ethical of the speaker, and shows a scientific restraint that his enemies would not think him capable. I do believe the documentary that these footprints existed, but science requires observability and repeatability. Sadly, old photographs of fossils does not materially strengthen the case, but relying too much on them now that they're no longer available for examination does definitely weaken it.
We have in texas at the Palauxy river by Glen Rose texas, the evolutionists try to hide this place.
Care to elaborate?
@@RichardFuller-i7v The London Artifact was found near London, Texas in Kimble County. The site is part of a large geographical zone called the Edwards Plateau. It primarily consists of Cretaceous rock. In June of 1934, Max Hahn discovered a rock, sitting loose on a rock ledge beside a waterfall outside London, Texas. Noticing that this weathered rock had wood protruding from it, he and family members cracked it open with a hammer and chisel, exposing the hammerhead to the light of day for the first time since the stone formed around it. To verify that the hammer was made of metal, they cut into one of the beveled sides with a file. In the resulting nick, bright, shiny iron was exposed. The bright metal in the nick is still there, with no detectable corrosion. The metal hammerhead is approximately six inches (15.24cm) long with a nominal diameter of one inch. This seems somewhat small for a gross pounding instrument, suggesting that this tool was meant for fine work or soft metal.
The density of the iron in a central, cross-sectional plane is shown in Photo K16. It shows the interior metal to be very pure, with no bubbles. Modern industry cannot consistently produce iron castings with this quality, as evidenced by test results that show bubbles and density variations that have caused pump and valve bodies to break. The handle eye is oval shaped, and roughly 1"x1/2".
Photo K16 shows that the density is about 10% greater near the surface. In this representation, colors are used to indicate the density of a particular region. The white areas are most dense, and the dark areas are least dense.
As previously stated, a file cut was made in one of the side edges in 1934, and has remained corrosion-free in the sixty-plus years since the artifact was discovered. The area is shown in photo G3.

The wooden handle appears to have been broken off, then worn smooth where it protruded from the rock concretion. Photo G6 shows the handle from the top with the hammerhead removed. The dark area in the wood is where it has partially turned to coal. The end of the handle visible through the top of the hammerhead eye appears sawn off, as shown in photo E2.
Remaining Questions:
Further analysis is planned to answer questions that include the following: Is the chlorine content in the iron alloy found throughout the hammerhead or only at the surface? Is the concentration of iron oxides higher in the rock immediately next to the hammerhead? Are there carbon-bearing residues in the cavity? There are reports that the file mark may contain FeO. This iron oxide does not readily form under present environmental conditions. We also know that evidence points to a decaying geomagnetic field, with a half-life of approximately 1400 years. If the hammer is truly ancient, could the stronger magnetic field have had the effect of helping the formation of FeO? If the artifact is truly from the Cretaceous time frame, where does this leave evolutionary theory, since man was not supposed to have evolved for another 100-million years or so? If the artifact is relatively recent, that means that the Cretaceous Hensell Sand formation from which it came is relatively young. Some may argue that the original rock and fossil were eroded and reworked, but reworked fossils show evidence of wear. The fossils in the concretion retain fine detail, indicating that they were not reworked, but part of the original formation. Again, where does that leave evolutionary theory with its traditional dates for the Cretaceous formations?
ABOUT THE MUSEUM
The Creation Evidence Museum
of Texas is a 501(c)3 non-profit
educational museum chartered
in Texas for the purpose
of researching and displaying
scientific evidence for creation.
VISITOR INFO.
How exactly do they do that?
@mattbrook-lee7732 how you ask?
That area is one of the most rich environments for fossils and, more specifically, dinosaur fossils, yet it is rarely used by the big collage for research. As a matter of fact, a professor from a prestigious Ivy school flew there and started destroying the footprints with a large metal bar , the one he specifically destroyed completely was a dinosaur print with a human print step inside of it ...
@murph19611 it was researched to death in the 1980s. Much of it by creationists looking for evidence. They stopped looking because they realised what they were finding was falsifying their claim. Since then creationists never go and investigate the actual tracks, preferring to just let the myth run on.
I haven't heard the story of the man destroying the print. But one guy with an iron bar doesn't add up to the conspiracy you are describing.
If the evidence is there, then it is for creationists to go and find it. The lack of activity you are describing says it all
I keep hearing the narrator say "the coelacanth's lung." The coelacanth is a fish. It has no lungs
Yeah he's really nit that bright so probably doesn't get that
The narrator is referring to a "fatty lung" or a fat-filled single-lobed vestigial lung, homologous to other fishes' swim bladders.
@@shazamshazamski I may have missed it but could you reply with the timestamp of when he talks about what he is defining as a “lung?”
Lots of fish have air sac bladders (lungs?).
@@mach1553 yes, fish have swim bladders which are filled with air but these are not “lungs.” The narrator has to be very careful with his terminology because it can either confuse the audience or make himself appear unknowledgeable.
Silliness at best. All gods are myth.
Brother Calvin,
I have to take issue with you on this video.
Please don't complicate it with evolution tripe.
I am a born-again Christian and a passionate believer in a six day creation around 6000 years ago. Just give us the facts and evidence, which supports this theory.
We just need some simple answers to simple questions.
1. Where and how many human fossils have we found?
2. What fossils have been found with/near them?
3. Where and how many dinosaur fossils have been found?
4. What fossils have been found with them? -- especially modern day animals and birds?
5. How long does it take, and under what conditions, are fossils formed?.
6. What about a fossilized boot?
7. What about a fossilized hammer found in a coal seam?
8. What about human and dinosaur footprints found together?
9. What simple and convincing evidence is there for a young Earth?
10. How about the Earth's deteriorating magnetic field?
11. How about the level of salt in the oceans?
12. How about the fact that spirals are still visible in the galaxies?
You might also mention that the JSWT has just blown the Big Bang theory to stardust!
Every time secular 'scientists' invent a new toy, they have to rewrite all their theories.
In Genesis, which was written some 3 500 years ago, we are told the origin of the of the Universe. Towards the end f the fourth day of creation, "God also made the stars" - possibly the greatest understatement ever put to print!
Genesis 1:1 also explains the origin or the Universe.
In the beginning (time), God (intelligence), created (energy), the Heavens (space) and the Earth (matter).
Creationists think that humans hunted dinosaurs to extinction. So even more so we should find humans and dinosaurs together as humans would have used dinosaur remains for shelter, clothing, and other uses.
I’ve never come across a creationist who believed that humans hunted dinosaurs.
Dinosaurs and humans lived millions of years apart from each other. What creationist did you ever talk with that believes that nonsense? It is basic knowledge that's being taught in primary school (at least where I live).
@@wiskyjack_7143 There are all manner of stories of men hunting dragons...being the corollary.
It's even stranger then that, they believe God fought a plesiosaur, killed it with a sword then feed the world with its skull. Isaiah 27:1 In that day the Lord with his hard and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and he will slay the dragon that is in the sea. Psalm 74:14 You crushed the heads of Leviathan; you gave him as food for the creatures of the wilderness.
@@FilipCordas These passages are describing the fulfilment of God's Genesis 3 promise: Jesus crushing the skull of the Accuser.
Really good video. 👏🏻
Ever seen a Cambrian rabbit - I though not. This is purs creationist nonsense.
Pollen and ostracods are a much harder sell for creationists. They Get REALLY quiet when you ask about them.
What makes me laugh is how they got the Koala bears and Kangaroos from Australia and all the other unique creatures from all around the world can't see a koala swimming the pacific ocean 😂
The reason no human/dinosaur fossils have been found in the same geological strata is because they did not exist at the same time. Dinosaurs died out around 65 million years ago, whereas the oldest fossilised human remains only date back to around 3.67million years and were the remains of Australopithecus a now extinct human species. So either Noah actually lived over 65 million years ago, or Ark Encounters are trying to alter the facts to suit their impossible version of events.
If Noah’s flood happened right now you would find me buried with my dog, man’s best friend. I really don’t think we were keeping dinosaurs as pets so we naturally wouldn’t be found with them
He want you to think that the Flintstones was a true documentary.
The flood took place 4300 years ago on the bible timeline. The Egyptians have over 5000 years of recorded history. The aboriginal Australians have over 50,000 years on their island.
I wonder if the fountains of the deep opening would be the water scientists found under the oceans?
Do you know why people laughed at Noah for building an Ark? There was no rain on the earth then there was a mist.
@douglaspaxson it would have took 3x the amount of water on the entire earth to cover the tallest mountain. The answer tobyour question is NO
@@douglaspaxson Noah's flood story is mythology. It never happened.
The number of fossils recovered from the La Brea tar pits is about 3.5 million, and includes 138 vertebrate species, many now extinct. Why has has there not been a single dinosaur fossil found there?
good question
It’s only about 40,000 years old. The dinosaurs were gone 65 million years ago.
@@Jason_Hubred , Apparently one didn’t.
The tar is the Terrible Lizards
humans and non avian dinosaurs lived millions of years apart that's why
The science says different.
@@francismarion6400 ever heard of earth layers?
@@francismarion6400 Science says differently.
Here, I corrected the grammar for you. Only 2 mistakes in that sentence, well done! But you have to correct the content mistakes on your own. You can do it :)
Problem with this series is they ASSUME there was only one flood, which if they truly understood what God told Noah God said he would never again destroy the earth with a flood. so Noah's flood was the last flood.
What is the problem with baby dinosaurs in the Ark? They wouldn't take much room, and wouldn't eat much.
Thanks for this.
Can i ask, what is your opinion on the 'Ashley phosphate beds' in South Carolina?
The Ashley phosphate beds are a man-made collection of mixed fossils produced from the detritus of various phosphate mines in the Charleston SC area. When phosphate was dug the miners would often find fossils mixed in. These fossils were discarded in piles next to the mine. Eventually all the fossils from the mines were collected dumped in a big pile into the Ashely river. This is from the book *Paleontology of the “Ashley Phosphate Beds” of Charleston: Insights from Northbridge Park, Charleston, South Carolina*
"A man-made deposit at Northbridge Park near Charleston, South Carolina, consists of phosphatic nodules, fossils, and mud dredged from the bottom of the Ashley River; nodules and fossils lay strewn across the banks of the river. This artificial deposit is likely representative of deposits mined extensively in the late nineteenth century and widely referred to as the “Ashley Phosphate Beds.” Many of the taxa discovered at Northbridge Park were historically reported from the phosphate beds, and include sharks, rays, bony fish, sea turtles, giant birds, whales, dolphins, sea cows, and land mammals. Some of these bear adhering matrix indicating origin from the Oligocene Ashley Formation. Others lack matrix but have short geochronologic ranges and are derived from the Ashley Formation, Lower Miocene Marks Head Formation, Lower Pliocene Goose Creek Limestone, and Pleistocene Wando Formation."
They're very comfortable
@@mattbrook-lee7732 except for the occasional spikes.
@@mattbrook-lee7732 LOL
I will look that up , thanks for sharing that information
The reason we do not find non-avian dinosaurs and human fossils together is they are seperated by over 65 million years.
If rocks formed in the crater at Mt Saint Helens were 10 years old, yet radio-isotope dating placed them at 1.5 million years….how can you be so certain about this 65 million year idea?
If the dinosaurs lived 65 million years ago, how is it that T-Rex bones have been found with soft tissue inside?
@@paulsimmonds2030 Microscopic traces of collegen dried out and encased in rock is not "soft tissue".
@@walkergaryaThe people that actually found them stated that they were soft tissue! Nice try! Read more!
@@shannaconda3434 Dr Mary Schwitzer who made this discovery, bathed the fossil matterial in acid then irrigated the microscopic traces in water. The material is collegen, not terribly soft and she has no doubt about the age of that fossil being about 68 million years old. You can quibble all you want about "soft", but it will get you nowhere.
They are 66 million years apart. That's why.
That’s a lie! the earth is only a little over 6,000 years old. Science backs this up
@@jasonavitable7024 Uranium-235 has a half-life of 700 million years Uranium-238 has a half-life of 4.5 billion years, half-life refers to how long it takes for half of the element to disappear or decay and by looking and seeing how far the decay is scientists can very easily ascertain exactly how old it is, both of these elements eventually decay into lead, so your statement about the age of the Earth is false science has never said the Earth is only 6,000 years old.
Jesus Christ is God. I'm praying for you have an encounter with Jesus.
@@robertfriend2205 you are not smart
Would like to see a discussion with Richard Dawkins and him.
A complete waste of Dawkins' time.
Many years ago. Someone found dinosaur and human fot prints aside eachother
The reason is humans and non-avian dinosaurs lived 66 million years apart.
Where are 66 million years worth of fossils?
And why are they discovering soft tissue in dinosaur bones...?
Pfeh. In my day it was 65 million years ago.
In all seriousness, I used to believe the millions of years number. Too many museum trips with displays talking about how all of a sudden floods created whatever fossil display I was looking at convinced me otherwise. Not creationist arguments but museum displays set up by people believing in evolution.
@@tedc4982 We have that, but don't you understand that 99.9% of every organism to have lived died without being fossilized, because fossilization takes very specific conditions, but we still have a huge fossil record despite that..
@@tedc4982 what exactly do you think soft tissue in dinosaur bones proves?
@@williamcozart8158 the method to "date" and give years had problems around 19 and 20 centuries, as physics had estipulations of years of universe Very different to earth's ...and consequently of fossils.
Why the consensus changed many times then? The method used in the First time to understand the age of fossil wasnt the same as today and late XX century. Why i should give crédit?
I questioned myself, after hearing of such "conditions" to fossils to come, and that are indeed very casual and specific, with long run time of deposition of soil.
But If some species that exists are encountered fossilized at same years or with "millions" of years, that wouldnt question evolution itself? If such thing happens, IS there explanation to see "fixed" species that doesnt evolved after millions of years? If that's so, people would question the Nature of the experiments done to give "years" to earth soil, those ARE questionable differently from the technology used to determine age of universe.
well, birds exist, don't they? so we literally are hanging out with dinosaurs
Well, they also existed during the dinosaur age which makes one think🤔
Lol when was the last time you saw a bird eat a goat? Or even have teeth like a dinosaur?
@@nathanhale7444 actually the other day I saw an eagle eating a large mammal - I think it was deer. However, me eating a deer and the eagle eating a deer doesn't make either one of a dinosaur. Birds have hollow bones and dinosaurs do not.
@@PeaceIntheValley I seriously doubt it killed the deer and eagles don't have teeth
@@nathanhale7444 when did the definition of dinosaur include the ability to eat a goat? That would exclude most known dinosaurs
Tell me you know nothing about science without telling me you know nothing about science.
Dazzle us with all of your true evidence based science that has 0 assumptions. Please! Tell us the truth oh mighty deliverer of all scientific knowledge!
@@shannaconda3434 300 BCE, that’s before the current era, 300 yrs before the invention of the buybull. Zeus sent Prometheus and epimetheus (forethought and afterthought-remember Jesus was alpha and the omega-beginning and the end) to earth to create all life and to give each creature its own special gift (there are gifts of the Holy Spirit). After creating all life, zeus didn’t like that epimetheus was alone, so on earth he created a garden and from it woman. He named her pandora, gave her a wedding present of a box and the gift of curiosity. Zeus gave pandora specific instructions not to open the box (Satan used eves curiosity to get her to eat the apple) but since she had the gift of curiosity, she opened the box and all of man’s woes entered the world.
That was believed as fact 300 yrs before the invention of what you believe now, 2300 yrs later. So if you believe a god created us out of a garden, I guess you shouldn’t say anything about that story either, since they’re the same.
Don’t even get me started on the flood story, which is only a story to remember the leap yr.
This video is SPOT ON.
Think tank theologians. Baruch HaShem.
Knowing that people did NOT want to spread out all over the world like God commanded to "fill the earth," we should only expect human fossils in the areas around the Genesis rivers and surrounding areas.
Yet we find Human fossils all over the world, converging to an ancestral population in Africa.
Dinosaurs and human footprints are found in the same strata...with the human footprints seemingly hunting and stalking the dinosaurs....I've seen those footprints right here in Texas
When I went to the zoo, why couldn’t I see chimps and lions in the same cage, they come from the same country?
Which country are you referring too?
@@Dualbladedscorpion7737 sorry, I don’t think you are understanding my comment quite how I intended.
Read it with the video title and a British sense of sarcasm in mind.
@@jamesmaybury7452 i got it. it was a nice joke.
maybury, so you agree that chimps and lions came into existence due to an intelligent being creating them?
clickbait title. we dont even find entire dinosaur skeletons.
yes we do I was eating one dinosaur yesterday and threw out a whole skeleton. Birds are dinosaurs.
If birds are dinosaurs, and people are birds, then dinosaurs are people, and we should therefore allow them to immigrate into our communities 🤦♂️
@@tnutz777 What exactly do you think a dinosaur is? And no people are not birds people are apes, they are both Amniotes.
@@FilipCordasNope, that is a very poor theory and it's not even close to fact!
@@shannaconda3434 it's not a theory it's classification birds are a subcategory of dinosaurs that's by definition. And it's impossible to classify all dinosaurs without birds using morphology geneticists or any other clarification system. Go ahead and try give me a definition of a dinosaur that won't include birds? And you can't cheat and use 'except birds'
This video is a joke
And it is not even funny. It fails on every level.
Lack of evidence is not evidence, though it does sustain a theory. A theory is speculation based on available evidence. In a trial, if you don't find a connection between a victim and another person, the 'evidence' suggests the two are not involved. Saying someone is "Right' or 'Wrong' in their speculation based on a lack of evidence is poor thinking. Evidence is not Right or wrong except by interpretation. You can incorrectly interpret evidence. You cannot correctly or incorrectly interpret, Lack of Evidence.
The story of the coelocanth lung is interesting in light of the story of Jonah and the whale, which creationists attempt to prove by saying Jonah did exactly as the lung did. He was swallowed, then spit up three days later, none the worse for wear. In any case, the coelocanth story is immaterial. Human bones could be found buried with dinosaur bones. It doesn't mean they were deposited at the same time. The simple answer to the question of humans and dinosaurs is they lived some 60 million years apart. Ancient humans knew dinosaurs had existed for the same reason we do. They saw the fossilized bones. And by the way, there is nothing in the bible that says, or even suggests the earth is only 6600 years old. Young earth creationists read a number of genealogies which they assume to be accurate, and go from there.
Please show your proof/evidence for badgers, beavers, squirrels, and platypus being found in Mesozoic strata.
These strata layers are all fake and false, there is no such thing as long formed rock layers, that’s where there is inconsistency in rock layers all around the world, the flood caused such a shock due to the massive earthquakes and chaos in the world that some fossils remained some didn’t rock layer doesn’t matter
Well done! Thanks!
It's interesting that we found bones of dinosaurs that became extinct approximately 65 million years ago , but we didn't find bones of our ancestors that lived approximately 100 thousand years ago !!! Weird . Where are all these bones?
According to the Bible, all animals were herbivores before the fall of man. After the flood, predators began to eat meat. It is unrealistic to think that baby animals could survive on their own-some might, but certainly not all. Predators like T-Rexes, lions, and alligators require significant amounts of meat. This would mean that the herbivores on the ark would likely be eaten by the predators, leading to the eventual death of the predators due to lack of food, since there were only two of each kind and not enough time for the herbivores to reproduce. This scenario challenges the idea of the flood as described in the Bible. While a massive flood did occur, it likely did not cover the entire earth. Flood myths are found in many religions and cultures, suggesting that people survived and saved local animals in various regions. The Bible's account reflects what was believed to have happened in a specific area.
If dinosaurs were on the ark, what happened to them since, they would have ruled the earth. And by the way how did species like Kangaroos make it to Australia and no where else