This is a really interesting concept. As a man of Christ in studying the flood, I could conclude that this is fairly accurate. What’s really interesting about the concept of dinosaurs is the fact that many were smaller than depicted in movies therefore, they could’ve existed with history. Isn’t that far-fetched .Evidence for the flood can be thrown in the great Sea Ridge paralleling the biblical account when they say the seas of the deep burst open.
Come on, by now even creationists should know that there is no liquid underground ocean. The water is trapped in a blue rock called ringwoodite, which can contain up to one percent water in its crystal structure.
I love this series! Please can you put the part number in the title of each video, as I would like to watch them in order (Yes, I missed a few!). Thank you!
In the Book of Job....It is written where God said "Look at the Behemoth ...with it tail like a cedar tree...unshaken by flowing rivers etc." Only a dinosaur has a tail as big a a cedar tree swaying. Even an elephant has a small tail so this is definitely referring to the dinos.
The music is to loud I'm 75 and if I turn uptrend sound to hear him talking the music is also louder. Please make the music softer so us older people can learn from your knowledge. Thank you for your knowledge and truth, a d thanks for sharing.
Yes, thank you for bringing this up, my mother is the same age, hard of hearing and has poor eye sight so cc is not an option for her. She finds the music overwhelms her ears, and can not hear the speaker at times.
I doubt most people searched out dinosaur herds to live close to. I suspect most dinosaurs occupied extremely unpopulated areas of the Earth. Although people today can live in a rather close proximity to elephants and lions etc., they don't generally interact much. If I lived long ago I probably would find a spot less populated with dinosaurs. Just me, but I think most of us would do likewise.
High walls that were so thick that two full chariots side-by-side could make a turn on top of them (Babylon) also kept people inside safe from animals.
Unfortunately, there seems to be a great deal of trolls among your comment section ...perhaps troll control would be helpful. Many blessings as God continue to bless your ministry and speak to man's blindness to the true facts about creation, the flood, and most of all the Bible. .
Thanks for your hard work, Calvin. By the way, I've observed that internet trolls (of an evolutionary persuasion) survived the Flood and seem drawn to your comment section. 🤣🤣🤣
evolution was written by an bittered christian , when darwin's ten year old daughter died, he turned against his faith, he replaced the word God with mechanism. I googled different questions on how does evolution explain this or that, that's when the one constant kept showing up , mechanism, According to evolutionary theory, a female's ability to ovulate evolved as a mechanism to maximize reproductive success by allowing for a specific fertile window where conception is most likely, potentially leading to increased selective pressure for females to choose high-quality mates and for males to compete for access to fertile females during ovulation; this is often accompanied by the concept of "concealed ovulation" in humans, where females don't exhibit obvious signs of fertility, which may have evolved to encourage paternal investment from multiple potential mates by creating uncertainty about paternity. So evolution is a matter of faith.
How do you explain away that there is a clearly defined order of fossils in the rock layers? Did the animals dive to their specific rock layer and have themselves buried right there? I find it especially interesting that you guys are not interesting in even trying to look for evidence for your childish flood.
The best explanation I ever heard about the dinosaur extinction was the decrease in atmospheric pressure after the earth had lost it's water canopy . Probably the same reason the human lifespan was reduced by about a factor of 10 . As far as population dispersion remember too the 'continents' may have come about as a result of the 'breaking up' of the earth's crust to usher forth the waters from below ! Gen 10:25 hints that the earth may have been comprised of a single continent for a time after the flood .
If the Bible is the word of God, why do all the explanations depend on pure guesswork allied to the most outlandish fantasy ? Why do we even need explanations at all, when the Bible could have mde things perfectly clear in the first place ? There is a very simple explanation for "poulation dispersion", that requires neither guesswork nor fantasy. The story was written (or rather plagiarised) by middle-eastern peasants who had no knowledge of "the Earth", could not possibly imagine that it is spherical, who had no idea that there were distant continents such as Antarctica or the Americas, and that there were more than a couple of dozen species of animals. They did not have to explain how kangeroos got back to Australia, because they had no knowledge of either the animal or its continent of origin.
@@BruceFox-Lefriche It is because the Bible is not a book that can be understood the just the intellect ! It is not only The Word Of God' but it is 'God' too . Unless the reader has a relationship with God . . . has a born again spirit that is now alive to God ; the words are like reading an instruction manual for a house while one is trying to build a car ! Just as life begins at conception so too Bible life or understanding begins at salvation . Have you ever given your heart to The Lord Jesus ? Have you asked Him to reveal Himself to you ? Are you open to receiving Him as your savior & Lord ? If so this would be the start of understanding The Bible .
@@BruceFox-Lefriche - _"why do all the explanations depend on pure guesswork allied to the most outlandish fantasy ?"_ *How are you so misled and blind to the fairytale nature of your own beliefs?* _"could not possibly imagine that it is spherical"_ *Why would that have been impossible to imagine?* _"who had no idea that there were distant continents such as Antarctica or the Americas"_ *At the time of the Flood, and for a few hundred years afterward, there was only one continent. It hadn't yet been divided.* _"and that there were more than a couple of dozen species of animals"_ *There were likely many hundreds of distinct species on board the ark.* _"They did not have to explain how kangeroos got back to Australia, because they had no knowledge of either the animal or its continent of origin."_ *There was no Australian continent until a few hundred years after the Flood. By then, the animals had already migrated to wherever would be their new home.*
What I find most ridiculous about the meteor strike is how selective it was! Only the dinosaurs, ALL varieties, were destroyed.... world wide!!! But other species, far more fragile, survived. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@joefriday2275 Neither the Hubble nor the James Web telescope has not proven a single thing from the bible and you have no amount of truth-stretching or wringing the pictures into however many corners you try it still won't work and you still have no proof whatsoever that your or any other god has ever existed or created anything.
@@joefriday2275 Do ever wonder why less than 1% of the prison population in the US are Atheists and why Atheistic countries like in Scandinavia which is regularly voted the happiest and best countries in the world to live in and as for lagging in technology that's just a lie and universal health care is much better in every other country in the world whether they are atheistic or not.
@@joefriday2275 North Korea is Atheist because their leader doesn't want his people to think there is a higher power than him, he is the ultimate power and nothing can be more powerful than him.
The dinosaurs were able to spread across the world because the world wasn’t divided until the days of Peleg. Read 1 Chronicles 1:19. Peleg was Abram’s great, great grandfather.
The largest creatures wouldn't have survived for very long after release from the ark or their growth became stunted to adapt to the radically different atmosphere post flood. The giant long neck dinosaurs had sinus cavities that could provide enough oxygen only in an atmosphere twice as rich in oxygen as we have today. They probably adapted the same way that island bound mammoth did off the coast of Siberia. They became smaller.
@@UnknownAlien475 this is that the wicked are ignorant of, that there was judgement and God did deluge the earth in a flood. Like wise the seventieth week will come upon them that do not believe, and they will not escape. Make fun all you want, I know your end!
@rofishy2 Unfortunately, I have to follow the evidence. I majored in Biology and minored in Geology for my undergrad, and I was forced to admit that there is no way a flood happened.
I was hoping that the answer to how unique animals ended up isolated after the flood would be addressed more clearly. Since the Creation story makes it plain that Pangaea was what God initially created and called Land, why is it that the separation of the continents is never alluded to as a consequence of the flood and it's receding? It seems evident to me that the division of the continents occurred AFTER the flood and this is what is hinted at in the statement concerning Peleg that says, "In his days the earth was divided". I don't believe it simply means people being dispersed because of Babel. If the earth is less than 10,000 years old, then the continental shifts occurred as recently as post-flood. Animals leaving the ark could have dispersed to separate regions that were later cut off from other, larger ones by the sea. That would explain Platypus and Kangaroos being only indigenous to Australia, Llamas to South America and camels to Central Asia to mention a few examples.
Evolutionist try hard to destroy the Biblical account of creation, First of all they say we evolved from apes, but can't explain why we still have apes. If we evolved from apes, why only some apes but not all? Why can't apes go to medical school and become doctors, or create iphones, if they are versions of our previous selves at the least shouldn't they be able to- talk, drive a car, we are created by design, all other theories are just ludicrous. The variety of fruit trees, the different flavors and color, the different ways they are packaged like the banana, easy opened and ready to eat. Take the orange, when you look at the packaging, you know what you are about to eat, color coded, not an accident, orange peel and the color of its fruit, then the lime, bright green peel, inside green fruit, same with the lemon. Apple trees totally different from a peach tree, or plum, all have seeds, God's expansion plan to for more trees, more delicious ready to eat food, only reasonable explanation is by design, and I only mentioned a few. Same with the variety of juicy melons, so many tasty fruits and vegetables, each different from the other this can only happen by design. The next thing they harp on is the Dinosaurs. At the time of the Flood, the great birds of flight like Pterodactyl died during this time there was no place to perch , no rest, and starvation. many of the sea creatures died, but some survived. In addition, all of the land creatures outside the Ark died, but the representatives of all the kinds that survived on the Ark lived in the new world after the Flood. We still see proof of the dinosaurs in land animals, like the elephants, rhinos, huge in size, and smaller versions of dinos, like the variety of lizards. One of the most amazing beast is the musk ox (or musk oxen) are enormous arctic mammals that live in large herds. Weighing 440-900 pounds. Those land animals (including dinosaurs) found the new world to be much different than the one before the Flood. Still in this day we can look to the seas, and see huge creatures like the fin whale, even bigger in weight and length is the blue whale, 90 to a 100 ft long, height 16ft tail fin 25 ft wide, weight 300,000 pounds, largest living creature in existence, still living today. More reasons why we no longer see the great dinos. Due to (1) competition for food that was no longer in abundance, (2) other catastrophes tar pits or the ice age, which could be due to the flood, During the time of the flood, the waters exceeded will above the mountain tops, Mount Everest is the world's highest mountain because it has the highest elevation point above sea level- (29,031.69 feet) add another 15 cubits (= 22 feet) above the highest mountain top. Noah entered the Ark in his six hundredth year, and on the 17th day of the second month of that year "the fountains of the Great Deep burst apart and the floodgates of heaven broke open" and rain fell for forty days and forty nights until the highest mountains were covered to a depth of 15 cubits, and all life perished except Noah and those with him in the Ark. After 150 days, "God remembered Noah ... and the waters subsided" until the Ark rested on the mountains of Ararat, and on the 27th day of the second month of Noah's six hundred and first year the earth was dry. At the lowest land level what would be the water temperature, or the water temperature at the bottom of the deep seas and oceans, it is reasonable this could very well been the ice age, also proving the earth is not as old as the evolutionist believe. (3) man killing for food and for sport, (4) the destruction of habitats, etc.
Talk about there will be an increase knowledge in the end of days! The internet is absolutely fantastic🎉 when I was a little girl growing up in 1980 I remember anytime I had a question about what something was or what something meant I had to break out the old Encyclopedia Britannica set find the correct book look up whatever I was trying to find and then I would usually get about three sentences explaining some scientific theory. It is quite amazing to me 40 some years later to be sitting here with a way better digital encyclopedia right here in my hand I have 100% access 100% of the time on any subject that I could ever want to know about. Plus modern science is proving most of those old theories wrong❤
2:09 Did anyone catch just how huge this point is (in regards to a certain point) when it comes to evos contradicting themselves? Let me know if you didn't catch it. I'll gladly point it out. 😊👌 - Edit 3:40 And here's another one. 😮
I have always theorized that monoliths where created to protect aginst "big" animals, not just other humans. Maybe "big" animals where also used to move such big rocks ;-)
Certain turtle species determine sex according to temperature of the eggs. If something like that was the case with the dinosaurs, then the colder conditions after the Flood might account for the rapid extinction of a vast number of kinds.
"God rested on the 7th day" Why on Earth would an all-mighty being need to rest? The people who wrote the bible had no concept of what all-powerful or all-knowing means. That's why the bible tells us about an "angry" or "disappointed" god. Honestly, I think one has to be quite ... to never even think this through for a little bit.
@@davidgardner863 I wouldn't say in a few years probably a lot of years, it is more than possible for two kinds of animals to produce species different to themselves, this is just called genetic variation within kinds we see this today even. Humans also use this genetic variations to produce dogs suited to their needs it's called cross breeding, and this can be done by animals with or without human intervention, one way or another animals will produce after their own kind. and remember that most of these species off today did not exist in Noah's time, like four examples most of the dog breeds we have today are a result of human intervention they were not around Noah's time,
About dinosaurs, Mr. Sagan suggested Inherited Memories ! ? Passed on through our DNA from our non-human ancestors too? That's an interesting view! Strangely, there might be something about that !!! (no, not about having non-human ancestors). Please don't misunderstand my words! I remember reading or viewing something not too long ago from a Christian viewpoint about God writing himself in our DNA. There might be a UA-cam video about this too (I'll look further to remind myself of where I read that before). So, what Mr. Sagan may be suggesting, has some merit to consider, (though the literal "Inherited memories" theory IS absurd). I only know what my Dad did when he was a child, because he told me. It's not because of some personal experiences he had, that was saved in his DNA and passed on to me at conception. So, did dinosaurs survive the flood during Noah's time? Yes, I believe so. Land Dinosaurs might have been taken on the ark, if we believe in the story written in the Book of Genesis Ch 7 vs 2. What killed them off? Answer: Man. Over time and even similar to today, man has killed off species, or kinds.
I agree, we're the reason why these big lizards (dinosaurs) went extinct. In fact, we've caused a lot of species of animals to go extinct, mostly by eliminating their habitat. And dinosaurs are in the Bible, (just not actually called that, but dragons, fiery serpents, the great lizard and leviathan etc) and the Israelites did encounter these animals throughout their journey through the wilderness, when they fled from Pharaoh and the Egyptian army. The argument that evolutionists make is, birds "evolved" from dinosaurs, meanwhile they claim they died 65 Million Years ago, thus contradicting themselves. God created all of the birds on day Five of Creation, then on day Six of Creation, He created all of the land animals, including dinosaurs and humans. This would mean that birds couldn't have "evolved" from dinosaurs and our ancestors DID interact with these big lizards. God bless and happy Sabbath.
This doesn't include the amount of fresh water needed to keep all the animals alive. Oh, and the collective heat and humidity from that many vertebrates in such close quarters within an insulated space (the wooden vessel) would probably cause a lot of heat stroke before long. Remember, humans are one of the only animals that sweat. Also, the sheer amount of accumulated urine and scat that would be deposited every day would be too much for Noah and his family to clean up. This would result in the waste piling up, increasing the change of disease and infection for much of the ark's denizens. The urine would saturate the place with so much ammonia by the end of the voyage, that much of the animals would have died from ammonia poisoning or asphyxiation. Even under the most generous conditions, the ark wouldn't work by far. There are so many problems, irreconcilable problems with the flood/ark story. Supposedly, the ark was afloat for 150 days. So you have all the issues with space, food and water storage, waste removal, methane buildup, etc., but what about after the ark lands? How was food and water supplied for those gazillions of animals? The vegetation needed to feed the ruminant animals would taken AT LEAST an entire season to grow, not even taking into consideration the problem with the salinization of ALL the land. After landing, what did all the predators eat? It's just problem after problem with this entire story, start to finish. Might as well try and prove red riding hood as true story or Peter Pan.
The skylights running the full length of the ark (as it was)would would provide enough ventilation and can work in conjunction with a high moon pool causing bellows to move the air around and a spare one to use as a means of waste removal using simple wood based machines. Rain water falling on the roof can be collected by bamboo pipes to fill a large amount of clay jars to supplement their water supply. Animals that can hibernate will hibernate and that will save on food and waste issues ,only to wake up once in a while and back to sleep. Most cages most likely had self watering containers and self feeding versions to save on effort and time. Slatted bottoms for quick waste removal.Having around 15,000 different animal types to watch over, very young animals that were still small and not reproducing yet also helps. Everything would have been well thought out in the pre planing stage to make life easier for the 4 men and their wives. There is no need for them to bust their butts from the time God shut them in personally and when they were allowed off. They most likely had a lot of free time on their hands. Upon landing Noah did not get off for some time. It rained a lot and would quickly remove a lot of salt off the land and freshen the ponds and lakes and the grass would start to grow quickly in a couple weeks it would be graze-able. As for predators, there would be a banquet worth of dead fish and other marine life on the new river banks and shore lines to help with that until the prey animals numbers to grow large enough for the meat eaters natural instincts to kick-in again.
@@wendigos_eat_people7177 I give it to you, that you have spent some time to think about the matter. Let's calculate this through: There are 6.5 million land dwelling animal species on Earth which represent about 1% of all animal species that ever existed. (Yes, 4,300 years ago 99% of all species that ever lived on earth were already extinct). According to the measurements given in the bible most creationist websites calculated the ark with a volume of 50,000 cubic meters. Most of the beforementioned animals are tiny. Therefore we will only count those bigger than a common rat, which leaves us with 50,000 species. Two animals of each species represent 100,000 animals with an average size of a sheep. If we go by sheer volume we have half a cubic meter per animal on the ark. That's a space of 80cm x 80cm x 80cm for each animal. Roughly enough space for each animal, right? But wait! This reminds me of the old pro-life claim that all the world population would fit into Texas. That might be technically true, but that calculation doesn't include infrastructure, farm land, areas for mining, etc. Making Texas the biggest graveyard in the world. So we have to take into consideration that these poor animals have some basic needs too: Water, food (some of them have a very special diet) and waste disposal. We need space for the infrastructure to distribute food, water and fresh air to the animals and a system to remove the feces. The high moon pools you are talking about as well as a ventilation system will need some space. I am no expert on that, but I think about 20% of the available space (10,000 cubic meter) sounds reasonable. And then you need a lot of space to store the food to feed 100,000 animals for 7 months. (Let's ignore the fact that many animal species can't live off dry food and need a very special diet, like meat e.g.. Example: Panda bears eat only bamboo shoots, Koala bears live exclusively off the leaves of the eucalyptus tree.) Assuming that our animals will eat about 2% of their body weight (0.5kg/animal) on average per day the daily amount of food needed is 50 tons/ day. Therefore we need 9,500 tons of food for the trip, taking also about 10,000 cubic meter. Now we are left with 30,000 cubic meters space for the animals (67cm x 67cm x 67cm per animal). With no space for water tanks (because it's raining all day long, right?) >> Animals that can hibernate will hibernate and that will save on food and waste issues ,only to wake up once in a while and back to sleep. Animals hibernate during the winter time in northern countries. The ark will have stayed in warm waters in order not to have to provide heating to keep everyone warm. Therefore it is unlikely that animals were hibernating in the ark. >> Most cages most likely had self watering containers and self feeding versions to save on effort and time. Which still need to be filled from time to time. A zoo with 5,000 animals has about 200 zoo keepers. >> They most likely had a lot of free time on their hands. Imagine a zoo with 100,000 animals with 8 zoo keepers. How much free time do you think they would have? >> very young animals that were still small and not reproducing yet also helps. baby animals have to learn from their parents and siblings how to survive. There would have been nobody to teach them once they were off the ark. >> Upon landing Noah did not get off for some time. It rained a lot and would quickly remove a lot of salt off the land and freshen the ponds and lakes and the grass would start to grow quickly in a couple weeks it would be graze-able. So we have to add food for at least another two months for 100,000 animals to the equation. And how long would the rain take to remove the salt from the land? Do you know? >> As for predators, there would be a banquet worth of dead fish and other marine life on the new river banks and shore lines to help with that until the prey animals numbers to grow large enough for the meat eaters natural instincts to kick-in again. Do you know how long fish stays fresh enough to serve as food? A few days maximum. And then the lions have to wait until the sheep have their 3 babies per year to eat them? There is a reason for why there are a lot more prey animals than hunters. A lion eats between 5 to 7kg of meat per week. Have you really calculated all this through well? And how did the kangaroos get back to Australia? Riding on the back of a whale?
@@wendigos_eat_people7177 Creationist "scientists" have long ago already come to the same conclusion as me: That there would not have been enough manpower to feed 100,000 animals, that you can't collect enough rain water or store enough water to water them and that there is no space for food left. So now they push the story that there were only 5,000 "basic kinds" of animals on the ark which then, after the flood diversified in a hyper accelerated super-fast evolution into the millions of species which live today. So they hate evolution, but then they propose that post-flood evolution took place at a speed millions of times faster than today. In my opinion this is so dragged in by the hair that compared to that a 900 year old Noah almost sounds realistic.
The canopy theory is the most plausible.. The air pressure was double back then. Jurassic park could never happen. They couldnt breathe... So after they got off when they reached a certain size they die. And hunted off...
We know water flooded the earth, covered the highest mountain peak, so what was the water temperature in the valleys , and think about how long the water was on the earth then factor no sunshine, the ice age had alot to do with the extinction of the great beast mentioned in the bible, so yes the flood did bring about the extinction of the dinos.
"Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth". Exodus 20:4
Let's calculate this through: There are 6.5 million land dwelling animal species on Earth which represent about 1% of all animal species that ever existed. (Yes, 4,300 years ago 99% of all species that ever lived on earth were already extinct). According to the measurements given in the bible most creationist websites calculated the ark with a volume of 50,000 cubic meters. Most of the beforementioned animals are tiny. Therefore we will only count those bigger than a common rat, which leaves us with 50,000 species. Two animals of each species represent 100,000 animals with an average size of a sheep. If we go by sheer volume we have half a cubic meter per animal on the ark. That's a space of 80cm x 80cm x 80cm for each animal. Roughly enough space for each animal right? But wait! This reminds me of the old pro-life claim that all the world population would fit into Texas. That might be technically true, but that calculation doesn't include infrastructure, farm land, areas for mining, etc. Making Texas the biggest graveyard in the world very quickly. So we have to take into consideration that these poor animals have some basic needs too: Water, food (some of them have a very special diet) and waste disposal. We need space for the infrastructure to distribute food, water and fresh air to the animals and a system to remove the feces. The high moon pools you are talking about as well as a ventilation system will need some space. I am no expert on that, but I think about 20% of the available space (10,000 cubic meter) sounds reasonable. And then you need a lot of space to store the food to feed 100,000 animals for 7 months. (Let's ignore the fact that many animal species can't live off dry food and need a very special diet, like meat e.g.. Example: Panda bears eat only bamboo shoots, Koala bears live exclusively off the leaves of the eucalyptus tree.) Assuming that our animals will eat about 2% of their body weight (0.5kg/animal) on average per day the daily amount of food needed is 50 tons/ day. Therefore we need 9,500 tons of food for the trip, taking also about 10,000 cubic meter. Now we are left with 30,000 cubic meters space for the animals (67cm x 67cm x 67cm per animal). With no space for water tanks (because it's raining all day long, right?) >> Animals that can hibernate will hibernate and that will save on food and waste issues ,only to wake up once in a while and back to sleep. Animals hibernate during the winter time in northern countries. The ark will have stayed in warm waters in order not to have to provide heating to keep everyone warm. Therefore it is unlikely that animals were hibernating in the ark. >> Most cages most likely had self watering containers and self feeding versions to save on effort and time. Which still need to be filled from time to time. A zoo with 5,000 animals has about 200 zoo keepers. >> They most likely had a lot of free time on their hands. Imagine a zoo with 100,000 animals with 8 zoo keepers. How much free time do you think they would have? >> very young animals that were still small and not reproducing yet also helps. baby animals have to learn from their parents and siblings how to survive. There would have been nobody to teach them. >> Upon landing Noah did not get off for some time. It rained a lot and would quickly remove a lot of salt off the land and freshen the ponds and lakes and the grass would start to grow quickly in a couple weeks it would be graze-able. So we have to add food for at least another two months for 100,000 animals to the equation. >> As for predators, there would be a banquet worth of dead fish and other marine life on the new river banks and shore lines to help with that until the prey animals numbers to grow large enough for the meat eaters natural instincts to kick-in again. Do you know how long fish stays fresh enough to serve as food? A few days maximum. And then the lions have to wait until the sheep have their 3 babies per year to eat them? There is a reason for why there are a lot more prey animals than hunters. A lion eats between 5 to 7kg of meat per week. Have you really calculated all this through well? And how did the kangaroos get back to Australia? On the back of a whale?
No, dinosaurs are millions of years old because the layers of the earth the fossils are found in have been dated. We humans have never found dinosaur soft tissue or bones. 😂
@@donzo5984you are seriously denying evidence, go and research Mary Switzer research on finding soft tissue in dinosaur bones, and you said they were dated can I ask what dating method was used
Seems logical dinosaurs were around after the flood. As large as many were when grown maybe only the young ones would have been taken on the ark. Some of the dragon stories of ancient times were probably true but over time humans might have seen them as being a little different. I'm not sure the fire breathers were real. Pterodactyls would have been the flying dragons. No one is alive now that were around when the dinosaurs were so all we have to go on is fossil records.
There are many misinformation in this video for 1. Dragons never existed they are exaggerating by people who are mentally unstable. 2. Dinosaurs never lived near or next to humans many depictions of so called “dinosaurs “ are actually the animals we see in real life. And 3. There is something called Pangea were all 6 continents collid into one super continent so obviously animals migrate to those areas before the continents split. And 4th there was no Ice age at the time that Noah’s ark landed on mount Ararat and it’s impossible for two animals to repopulate the earth
Plenty of dragon, aka dinosaur illustrations, including some of his own, show dinosaurs with wings. So much to my surprise, this proves that birds developed from dinosaurs.
Ancient humans found dinosaur bones all over the world. That's how dragon myths were created. Imagine making a 15min video and not addressing this most obvious explanation, instead coping how humans and dinosaur had to coexist to desperately "prove" Bible not being full of...
"If Sagan uses the words "dinosaurs" and "dragons" interchangeably, in stories from folke-tales, then surely they must have existed in resent times". So when it comes to proof, the bar is lowered dramatically when it suits Calvin Smith. While - of course - no amount of proof is good enough, when it comes to evolution. Can Calvin, himself, see the problem in that? (But of course not...)
@@calvinsmith7575 The word "Dinosaur" was invented in 1842 by the paleontologist Richard Owen: "The combination of such characters ... will, it is presumed, be deemed sufficient ground for establishing a distinct tribe or sub-order of Saurian Reptiles, for which I would propose the name of Dinosauria*. (*Gr. δεινός, fearfully great; σαύρος, a lizard. ... )". Fossilized bones of dinosaurs were suggested by Chinese to be bones of dragons, as far back as a couple of thousand years. Nobody has described seeing any animal, alive or as anything other than fossilized bones - unlike other big animals like mammoths, which we have proof were hunted and not just part of folk legends. Folk legends do not constitute proof of existence, any more than winged horses, unicorns, cyclops or mermaids.
Creationists should consider if worldwide mass extinctions happened catastrophically several hundred years after the Flood. The Belt Supergroup rock layers in the Rocky Mountains have low grade metasedimentary rock layers. This requires heat. They do not appear to have Flood sediments lying on these low grade metasedimentary rock layers. This suggests metamorphism happened after the Flood. Also, the valleys east of the Belt Supergroup have “tertiary” lake beds that contain lignite. Lignite is a low grade of coal that forms at temperatures up to about 100° C (212° F). How did the lignite lake beds form in these valleys if hot temperatures are needed? A simple explanation is that metamorphism happened after the Flood when mountains were uplifted. This explains the low-grade metamorphism of the Rocky Mountains and the lignite in the "tertiary" lake beds in the valleys. This also suggests that ice age features were formed catastrophically when mountains were uplifted during worldwide volcanic and metamorphic activity. This explains why so many plants and animals are extinct.
>> Did the Dinosaurs Survive the Biblical Flood? Easy question and can be answered in 2 Sentences: 1.) Non-avian dinosaurs were long extinct before the biblical flood. 2.) And the birds had no problem with it because the flood didn't happen.
@@calvinsmith7575 not really. It was a counter to people making art based on mythical creatures. He was implying that people saw live dinosaurs back in the day not saying they were depicting dragons based off of fossils. I was considering going back to Christianity and this video did more harm than good. This guy is so far off the real facts it’s asinine.
This is a joke.....there were no dinosaurs on the ark....no penguins, either. This dude needs to reconsider his interpretation of the scriptures, and how Jesus created, and designed, how our universe works.
Noah's flood hopefully never happened. If it did, then god committed genocide, not a nice thing. And getting advice on paleontology from a pastor is like getting medical advice from a car mechanic.
@@calvinsmith7575 So, if Noah's flood occurred, then Babies were drowned, even unborn fetuses were killed. From your perspective, they were guilty. Guilty of doing what? Please be precise. I am interested in learning how killing an unborn can be justified.
I have a copy of "The Dragons of Eden" and, at best, a very poor interpretation, and, at worst, just flat out dishonest. This was easily his least scientifically rigorous work, and he makes this clear. This was obviously a whimsical thought experiment about some of the oddities and coincidences regarding dreams and innate human fears. NOTHING was ever meant to be taken as scientific outside of the data sets he used occasionally to base his hypotheticals off of. And as long as you're sending people off to query biologists, they should also inquire as to their thoughts on dinosaurs being contemporaries of homosapiens, a worldwide flood, age of the earth, or how two of all species and seven of each "clean" species of animals could exist with only a single window, managed by only eight people, on a wooden craft that couldn't possibly hold together at sea for over a year. But why wouldn't you bother asking biologists or considering anything Carl Sagan had to say if they are so undoubtedly wrong? Your claims should stand on their own merits. But because they cannot, you must try to have real learned people both ways. They're either worthy of regard or they're not.
how would humans co-existing with dinosaurs lead to evolution being seen as "dead in the water"? why can't both evolution and humans co-existing with dinosaurs be true? I'm genuinely curious!
The most recent ice age didn’t lower the sea level enough for the platypus to crawl from the mountains of Ararat to Australia. The most recent ice age thawed 11,000-12,000 years ago. The Noah’s ark story is claimed to have taken place around 4,000 years ago. BTW the most recent ice age thawed 4,000-5,000 years before AIG’s universe was created.
eeeeeeh they aren't extinct, why don't he mention Nessie over in scotland? or the over 90 sightings of pteradon's here in North Carolina, or the one over in the amazon?
doubt it. Human bodies tend to float and be eaten and their bones dissolve, If a mile high tsunami were to fall on you, you most likely turn to goo, think Oceangate and what happen when their submersible imploded.
Genesis 10:25... To Eber were born two sons:the name of the one was Peleg,for in his days the earth was divided;and his brother's name was Joktan. That took place somewhere around the tower of Babel,and the earth was connected in one land mass untill that time. You can see that there are some big fosill grave yards in south-west Africa (one part) and the "continuation" of the same graveyard in south-east America... so,cangaroos floated away on the raft called "Australia"😅😂😂😂
Humans are 100k years old as far as we can tell. Dinosaurs lived about 60 million years ago. So it’s impossible for a human to have seen one. And with dragons, it’s not hard to understand that humans have thought up countless creatures in their mythology. Hardly mind bending to think of a big scary reptile.
@@TheAArmstrong A sample from the 1980s Mt St Helens eruption was sent to the lab in the 1990s. They dated the rock at 2.8 million years old. Same with Hawaiian rock, New Zealand rock. ALL rock of known age has been incorrectly dated. So I think its ridiculous when they say tiktaalik is 375 million years old, or dinosaurs died 60 million years ago.
Yay! Another story time with Dr. Calvin! Spinning the poetry of Sagan into bible code in our DNA!? Whatever that overrated mental midget Sagan was getting at - it sounded like a quote - he wasn't challenging the antiquity of dinos, nor validating past-life memories. If anything, he might say that genetic imprinting of threats of large(r) reptiles dates back to the age of dinos or far beyond. That means the eyes that beheld the beasts weren't human. The only humans known to have contended with relatively giant dragons were the tiny 'hobbits' of Flores Island, which was crawling with Komodo dragons (not our ancestors). I'm just chillin until comments open on the AIG 9/3 stream on the matching dino prints astride the ocean. I've already looked at the new paper by Dr. Louis Jacobs (Dr. Calvin turned me on to him). The research behind the study and conclusions is exhaustive. Spoilers: Don't get your hopes up: Dr. Jacobs isn't challenging the antiquity of dinos, either. Far from it. Actually, it was the Pangaea breakup and opening of the Atlantic. That took a minute!
@@joefriday2275 Textbook psychological projection. You should see somebody about that. 'All there has ever been.' I don't know the context, but it sounds like a simple statement everybody can agree with.
@@joefriday2275 Textbook psychological projection. Look it up. You might want to see somebody about that. He didn't say that it had no beginning, did he?. He knew about Hubble's finding and all the other physics at the time. He just said it's all that's ever been. Hypothetical multiverses and magical mythical deities aside, seems about right. Right? Shows how fundamentalists believe what they want, without any facts to support it. Instead, they cherry-pick quotes out of context to 'prove' it.
If birds are dinosaurs, so are fish. I think there's a lot of difference between birds and dinosaurs. I realize that a lot of evolutionists are going to disagree with me, and will say it doesn't matter what I think.
@@globalcoupledances you can list a bunch of names in a classification system invented by (ahem, totally unbiased) evolutionists. That's surely proof of your point. I have another one for you. Protozoa means early life. Therefore, because the name means that, we can know that these were some the earliest forms of life. That's proof for you.
@@hdsamteorigins of life have nothing to do with whether or not dinosaurs lived with humans or not. We have a stratigraphic column. The column is layered like books stacked on top of each other. So we divided them into sections. The Jurassic period is younger than the Triassic period that lies underneath it. And so on and so on. In those rocks we have fossils that date back 4 billion years, but evidence for complex life didn’t come for till about 600 million years ago. Don’t you see? We have a column of rocks, in those rocks we have fossils; in those fossils you will never, ever, ever find a human fossil in the Jurassic period in the Column and vice versa you will never find a dinosaur at the very top of the Holocene era. (The one we’re living in right now)
Did animals that went extinct 65 million years ago survive something that didn't happen? Dinosaurs existed for about 165 million years and they didn't all live in the some time period, either. Do you mean all the dinosaurs? Just the last ones to go extinct?
2Pet 3:3-7: "First of all you must understand this: In the last days mockers will come and, following their own desires, will ridicule us by saying, "What happened to the Messiah's promise to return? Ever since our ancestors died, everything continues as it did from the beginning of creation." But they deliberately ignore the fact that long ago the heavens existed and the earth was formed by God's word out of water and with water, by which the world at that time was deluged with water and destroyed. Now by that same word, the present heavens and earth have been reserved for fire and are being kept for the day when ungodly people will be judged and destroyed."
@@batobalaganov5494 That doesn't mean anything. This is a simple fact that we have absolutely no evidence to back this up, but we do have a folk lore story that this was based on. But its not real and never was meant to be real. You guys are just taking old Jewish folk and projecting them as if they really happened.
@@Arminius420 It's not the matter of evidence because there's plenty of it(in here and at Creation ministries). It's a problem of heart. I used to be like this too. I used to promote Darwinism. I just didn't want that God and I basicaly put my hands over my ears and yelled:"I don't believe it". Deep inside however I knew and I argued with God's voice. Reality is stubborn and doesn't care about my atittude towards it. Trust me, better not fool oneself because you will only have to blame yourself at the end. This is both tragic and horrifing experience that I wouldn't wish upon anybody. God is awesome and He opens up to truly objective people.
@@Arminius420 Evolution is indoctrination, there is absolutely no proof, just people putting things that look similar together in a family tree and calling it proof....these people would claim if they found the stages of a frogs development from birth to adult hood, fossilized in rock, that it would show evolution, from fish to land animal.
*Noah didn't take enough food on the Ark & had to eat something. That's why there is no more Dinosaurs. It took too long after landing for plants to grow, they had to eat something.*
Dinosaurs lived from 243 to 66 million years ago. Dinosaurs are not in the Bible, but many animals are not found in the Bible. Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today. The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is: Sunrise to sunset Sunset to next sunset Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ). We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains". Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens” The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours. Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 asks you to? Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
Lord, hear my prayer: If Thou art paying attention, Thou dost know that Thy Book of Genesis contains an account of Thy creation and the origins of Thy people which straineth credulity. Thou hast laid before us the wonders and mystery of the Earth, which we have used and abused and exploited, all in accordance with Thy alleged word and covenant. Verily, we multiplied like our distant cousins, the bunny rabbits, until we can't feed everyone, even with Thy blessed petroleum-based fertilizers and powerful pesticides. We have trampled and poisoned almost all that is good, and ruined the climate Thou didst provide for us. All thy other holy Kinds are dying off, and we seem to be next. But thou didst bless us with curiosity, and we hast looked upon the Book of Nature and discerned its manifest meaning. It hath taught the wise that Genesis didn't happen quite as Thou did'st tell it. Now division, strife, and frankly, contempt toward Thy truest believers are abroad in the land. I beseech thee to set your confused children straight, that peace may reign and science go about its business. Full disclosure, Lord: I've been a committed atheist since age 11, and been steadfast and devoted in my lack of faith, lo, these fifty years. I detest all charlatans, demagogues, other purveyors of ignorance and conspiracy theorists and pray that they might return to Thy true path. In that spirit, I willingly offer my life in hopes of restoring some level of sanity. Send thee to them a sign, that all may know of thy Truth. If they be correct, and Thy inspired word was intended to be taken seriously, then I doth pray Thee to strike me down, even unto death, that all should know that Thou dost not mess around or tolerate anything but slavish devotion in Thy beloved children. A lightening bolt would do the trick, but Thy will be done. OK, I'm ready... Any time now... Look, I'm dead serious here! I disbelieve in thee and thy bible, and fear thee not. Go ahead, smite me silly! Show the heathens the error of their ways. Do it! I dare thee! Thou wouldst be doing me a favor! Thy believers art idiots! Thou sucketh! Do it! I deserve it, trust me! Thou art nothing, a hoax, a fraud, a myth, a meme, a delusion! A loser and a coward! Do it! I'd spit upon Thy holy countenance if given half a chance. What the hell's Thy problem? Smite! Well, I think that settles it. Let it be written: I stand unsmitten! Amen
@@MrWeezer55 I agree there are fossils, but I have yet to see a chain of intermediary incremental transitions (male/female) of ANY creature evolving into another? Fish are supposed to have evolved into amphibians, thus, where is the fossil record of both male/female fish evolving……… Backbone evolving into shoulders/arms/wrists/fingers? Backbone evolving into hips/thighs/legs/ankles/toes? The evolution of the from fish head to amphibian head? Suffice I could go on, but if I have missed these fossils of both male/female fish simultaneously evolving the required body re engineering, then please point me to the actual evidence. Cunning linguistics and artistic impression do not serve as evidence.
@@thunderous-one If you were even remotely interested in finding the answers your questions, you would put them to competent specialists in the appropriate fields of scientific research instead of aimlessly posting them in a YT comment. Any paleontologist or evolutionary biologist could answer such extremely rudimentary questions with remarkableease, so that you might even be inclined to reconsider your poistion (though I seriously doubt that you would do so).
Looking in the mirror does. Nothing comes from nothing. With creation, there must be a creator. I'm not trying to argue, just stating what makes logical sense to me.
Bravo! Jesus Christ is King, Lord and Saviour! God's word is TRUTH!
Amen! Even the parts that contradict the other parts!
nope
😂
>> God's word is TRUTH!
I have no doubts about that.
But the bible is definitively man's word.
@@tierramagica-h1q never heard a word from "him"
This is a really interesting concept. As a man of Christ in studying the flood, I could conclude that this is fairly accurate. What’s really interesting about the concept of dinosaurs is the fact that many were smaller than depicted in movies therefore, they could’ve existed with history. Isn’t that far-fetched .Evidence for the flood can be thrown in the great Sea Ridge paralleling the biblical account when they say the seas of the deep burst open.
Come on, by now even creationists should know that there is no liquid underground ocean.
The water is trapped in a blue rock called ringwoodite, which can contain up to one percent water in its crystal structure.
I love this series! Please can you put the part number in the title of each video, as I would like to watch them in order (Yes, I missed a few!). Thank you!
They have been released in order 1-7 on our site : )
In the Book of Job....It is written where God said "Look at the Behemoth ...with it tail like a cedar tree...unshaken by flowing rivers etc." Only a dinosaur has a tail as big a a cedar tree swaying. Even an elephant has a small tail so this is definitely referring to the dinos.
and no man can get close to Behemoth but only it's creator.
How do you know he wasn't talking about a different animal? Or maybe he was even talking about Jesus?
The music is to loud I'm 75 and if I turn uptrend sound to hear him talking the music is also louder. Please make the music softer so us older people can learn from your knowledge. Thank you for your knowledge and truth, a d thanks for sharing.
Yes, thank you for bringing this up, my mother is the same age, hard of hearing and has poor eye sight so cc is not an option for her. She finds the music overwhelms her ears, and can not hear the speaker at times.
I dont know why these "creators" think their videos are "more" when they add music. The content is enough.
I doubt most people searched out dinosaur herds to live close to. I suspect most dinosaurs occupied extremely unpopulated areas of the Earth. Although people today can live in a rather close proximity to elephants and lions etc., they don't generally interact much. If I lived long ago I probably would find a spot less populated with dinosaurs. Just me, but I think most of us would do likewise.
Dinosaurs died out millions of years before humans were around.
They were never alive together, unless you count crocodiles.
High walls that were so thick that two full chariots side-by-side could make a turn on top of them (Babylon) also kept people inside safe from animals.
Unfortunately, there seems to be a great deal of trolls among your comment section ...perhaps troll control would be helpful.
Many blessings as God continue to bless your ministry and speak to man's blindness to the true facts about creation, the flood, and most of all the Bible. .
Trolls are expected! : ).
How dare they ridicule the ridiculous! 🤣😂🤣
Thanks for your hard work, Calvin. By the way, I've observed that internet trolls (of an evolutionary persuasion) survived the Flood and seem drawn to your comment section. 🤣🤣🤣
You mean “evolutionary perversion”
Because it is a comedy full of lies and half-truths and it is a great story Jews say, it is just a story.
The Greatest Story Ever Told.
Shoa Business
They are helping the algorithm. What they say is so silly it only strengthens the case for the truth of the Bible.
evolution was written by an bittered christian , when darwin's ten year old daughter died, he turned against his faith, he replaced the word God with mechanism. I googled different questions on how does evolution explain this or that, that's when the one constant kept showing up , mechanism,
According to evolutionary theory, a female's ability to ovulate evolved as a mechanism to maximize reproductive success by allowing for a specific fertile window where conception is most likely, potentially leading to increased selective pressure for females to choose high-quality mates and for males to compete for access to fertile females during ovulation; this is often accompanied by the concept of "concealed ovulation" in humans, where females don't exhibit obvious signs of fertility, which may have evolved to encourage paternal investment from multiple potential mates by creating uncertainty about paternity.
So evolution is a matter of faith.
How do you explain away that there is a clearly defined order of fossils in the rock layers?
Did the animals dive to their specific rock layer and have themselves buried right there?
I find it especially interesting that you guys are not interesting in even trying to look for evidence for your childish flood.
The best explanation I ever heard about the dinosaur extinction was the decrease in atmospheric pressure after the earth had lost it's water canopy . Probably the same reason the human lifespan was reduced by about a factor of 10 .
As far as population dispersion remember too the 'continents' may have come about as a result of the 'breaking up' of the earth's crust to usher forth the waters from below ! Gen 10:25 hints that the earth may have been comprised of a single continent for a time after the flood .
Watch documentary "The Day the Mesozoic Died: The Asteroid That Killed the Dinosaurs - HHMI BioInteractive Video"
If the Bible is the word of God, why do all the explanations depend on pure guesswork allied to the most outlandish fantasy ? Why do we even need explanations at all, when the Bible could have mde things perfectly clear in the first place ? There is a very simple explanation for "poulation dispersion", that requires neither guesswork nor fantasy. The story was written (or rather plagiarised) by middle-eastern peasants who had no knowledge of "the Earth", could not possibly imagine that it is spherical, who had no idea that there were distant continents such as Antarctica or the Americas, and that there were more than a couple of dozen species of animals. They did not have to explain how kangeroos got back to Australia, because they had no knowledge of either the animal or its continent of origin.
@@BruceFox-Lefriche It is because the Bible is not a book that can be understood the just the intellect ! It is not only The Word Of God' but it is 'God' too . Unless the reader has a relationship with God . . . has a born again spirit that is now alive to God ; the words are like reading an instruction manual for a house while one is trying to build a car ! Just as life begins at conception so too Bible life or understanding begins at salvation . Have you ever given your heart to The Lord Jesus ? Have you asked Him to reveal Himself to you ? Are you open to receiving Him as your savior & Lord ? If so this would be the start of understanding The Bible .
@@BruceFox-Lefriche - _"why do all the explanations depend on pure guesswork allied to the most outlandish fantasy ?"_
*How are you so misled and blind to the fairytale nature of your own beliefs?*
_"could not possibly imagine that it is spherical"_
*Why would that have been impossible to imagine?*
_"who had no idea that there were distant continents such as Antarctica or the Americas"_
*At the time of the Flood, and for a few hundred years afterward, there was only one continent. It hadn't yet been divided.*
_"and that there were more than a couple of dozen species of animals"_
*There were likely many hundreds of distinct species on board the ark.*
_"They did not have to explain how kangeroos got back to Australia, because they had no knowledge of either the animal or its continent of origin."_
*There was no Australian continent until a few hundred years after the Flood. By then, the animals had already migrated to wherever would be their new home.*
Or maybe just maybe… a huge Asteroid that was so big we can see its crater over 65 million years later.
What I find most ridiculous about the meteor strike is how selective it was! Only the dinosaurs, ALL varieties, were destroyed.... world wide!!! But other species, far more fragile, survived. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@joefriday2275 And you can't provide a shred of evidence for either your invisible magical mystery man or creation or intelligent design
@@joefriday2275 Neither the Hubble nor the James Web telescope has not proven a single thing from the bible and you have no amount of truth-stretching or wringing the pictures into however many corners you try it still won't work and you still have no proof whatsoever that your or any other god has ever existed or created anything.
@@joefriday2275 What evidence a 2000-year-old bronze age book??? lol.
@@joefriday2275 Do ever wonder why less than 1% of the prison population in the US are Atheists and why Atheistic countries like in Scandinavia which is regularly voted the happiest and best countries in the world to live in and as for lagging in technology that's just a lie and universal health care is much better in every other country in the world whether they are atheistic or not.
@@joefriday2275 North Korea is Atheist because their leader doesn't want his people to think there is a higher power than him, he is the ultimate power and nothing can be more powerful than him.
The dinosaurs were able to spread across the world because the world wasn’t divided until the days of Peleg. Read 1 Chronicles 1:19. Peleg was Abram’s great, great grandfather.
The largest creatures wouldn't have survived for very long after release from the ark or their growth became stunted to adapt to the radically different atmosphere post flood. The giant long neck dinosaurs had sinus cavities that could provide enough oxygen only in an atmosphere twice as rich in oxygen as we have today. They probably adapted the same way that island bound mammoth did off the coast of Siberia. They became smaller.
That and they still see these creatures deep in the Amazon.
You know a surprising amount in regards to anatomy considering you still believe in the Flood.
@@UnknownAlien475 this is that the wicked are ignorant of, that there was judgement and God did deluge the earth in a flood. Like wise the seventieth week will come upon them that do not believe, and they will not escape. Make fun all you want, I know your end!
@rofishy2 Unfortunately, I have to follow the evidence. I majored in Biology and minored in Geology for my undergrad, and I was forced to admit that there is no way a flood happened.
@@UnknownAlien475 It did because GOD never lies.
I was hoping that the answer to how unique animals ended up isolated after the flood would be addressed more clearly. Since the Creation story makes it plain that Pangaea was what God initially created and called Land, why is it that the separation of the continents is never alluded to as a consequence of the flood and it's receding? It seems evident to me that the division of the continents occurred AFTER the flood and this is what is hinted at in the statement concerning Peleg that says, "In his days the earth was divided". I don't believe it simply means people being dispersed because of Babel. If the earth is less than 10,000 years old, then the continental shifts occurred as recently as post-flood. Animals leaving the ark could have dispersed to separate regions that were later cut off from other, larger ones by the sea. That would explain Platypus and Kangaroos being only indigenous to Australia, Llamas to South America and camels to Central Asia to mention a few examples.
Evolutionist try hard to destroy the Biblical account of creation,
First of all they say we evolved from apes, but can't explain why we still have apes.
If we evolved from apes, why only some apes but not all?
Why can't apes go to medical school and become doctors, or create iphones,
if they are versions of our previous selves at the least shouldn't they be able to-
talk, drive a car, we are created by design, all other theories are just ludicrous.
The variety of fruit trees, the different flavors and color, the different ways they
are packaged like the banana, easy opened and ready to eat.
Take the orange, when you look at the packaging, you know what you are about to eat, color coded, not an accident, orange peel and the color of its fruit,
then the lime, bright green peel, inside green fruit, same with the lemon.
Apple trees totally different from a peach tree, or plum, all have seeds,
God's expansion plan to for more trees, more delicious ready to eat food, only reasonable explanation is by design, and I only mentioned a few.
Same with the variety of juicy melons, so many tasty fruits and vegetables,
each different from the other this can only happen by design.
The next thing they harp on is the Dinosaurs.
At the time of the Flood, the great birds of flight like Pterodactyl
died during this time there was no place to perch , no rest, and starvation.
many of the sea creatures died, but some survived.
In addition, all of the land creatures outside the Ark died,
but the representatives of all the kinds that survived on the Ark lived in the new world after the Flood.
We still see proof of the dinosaurs in land animals, like the elephants, rhinos,
huge in size, and smaller versions of dinos, like the variety of lizards.
One of the most amazing beast is the musk ox (or musk oxen)
are enormous arctic mammals that live in large herds. Weighing 440-900 pounds.
Those land animals (including dinosaurs) found the new world to be much different than the one before the Flood.
Still in this day we can look to the seas, and see huge creatures like the fin whale,
even bigger in weight and length is the blue whale, 90 to a 100 ft long, height 16ft
tail fin 25 ft wide, weight 300,000 pounds, largest living creature in existence,
still living today.
More reasons why we no longer see the great dinos.
Due to (1) competition for food that was no longer in abundance,
(2) other catastrophes tar pits or the ice age, which could be due to the flood,
During the time of the flood, the waters exceeded will above the mountain tops,
Mount Everest is the world's highest mountain because it has the highest elevation point above sea level-
(29,031.69 feet) add another 15 cubits (= 22 feet) above the highest mountain top.
Noah entered the Ark in his six hundredth year, and on the 17th day of the second month of that year
"the fountains of the Great Deep burst apart and the floodgates of heaven broke open"
and rain fell for forty days and forty nights until the highest mountains were covered to a depth of 15 cubits,
and all life perished except Noah and those with him in the Ark.
After 150 days, "God remembered Noah ... and the waters subsided"
until the Ark rested on the mountains of Ararat,
and on the 27th day of the second month of Noah's six hundred and first year the earth was dry.
At the lowest land level what would be the water temperature,
or the water temperature at the bottom of the deep seas and oceans,
it is reasonable this could very well been the ice age,
also proving the earth is not as old as the evolutionist believe.
(3) man killing for food and for sport,
(4) the destruction of habitats, etc.
Talk about there will be an increase knowledge in the end of days! The internet is absolutely fantastic🎉 when I was a little girl growing up in 1980 I remember anytime I had a question about what something was or what something meant I had to break out the old Encyclopedia Britannica set find the correct book look up whatever I was trying to find and then I would usually get about three sentences explaining some scientific theory. It is quite amazing to me 40 some years later to be sitting here with a way better digital encyclopedia right here in my hand I have 100% access 100% of the time on any subject that I could ever want to know about. Plus modern science is proving most of those old theories wrong❤
Just subscribed! I love AIG
I was recently in Cambodia. They have a carving of a Stegosaurus on a temple out there. That’s proof that men and dinosaurs lived together.
No it isn’t
That's just proof that they have a carving of a stegosaurus. Nothing more.
Actually the proof is that God tells us in the book of Job clearly and without doubt, that Job walked among dinosaurs some 4,000 years ago.
@@SaltAndGracePoetry that’s proof that someone wrote a book
@@RealHooksy Yes, God, through chosen men. That is enough for us Christians to take it as ironclad fact!
Truth spoken,as usual.
Great video! Well laid out.
Complete garbage
2:09
Did anyone catch just how huge this point is (in regards to a certain point) when it comes to evos contradicting themselves?
Let me know if you didn't catch it.
I'll gladly point it out. 😊👌
- Edit
3:40
And here's another one. 😮
The Flintstone legend is absolute proof that Noah had a pet dinosaur.
…and used a pelican as a toilet 🚽
Good video 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 also love the animation on the dinosaurs in 16:14.
I have always theorized that monoliths where created to protect aginst "big" animals, not just other humans. Maybe "big" animals where also used to move such big rocks ;-)
Certain turtle species determine sex according to temperature of the eggs. If something like that was the case with the dinosaurs, then the colder conditions after the Flood might account for the rapid extinction of a vast number of kinds.
So the dragon legends support the ark legend 😀
"God rested on the 7th day"
Why on Earth would an all-mighty being need to rest?
The people who wrote the bible had no concept of what all-powerful or all-knowing means.
That's why the bible tells us about an "angry" or "disappointed" god.
Honestly, I think one has to be quite ... to never even think this through for a little bit.
Please give me one observable piece of evidence for evolution
Give me one observable piece of evidence that a few thousand animals from the ark suddenly evolved into millions of species in a few years.😢
Wikipedia "Evidence of common descent"
@@davidgardner863 I wouldn't say in a few years probably a lot of years, it is more than possible for two kinds of animals to produce species different to themselves, this is just called genetic variation within kinds we see this today even.
Humans also use this genetic variations to produce dogs suited to their needs it's called cross breeding, and this can be done by animals with or without human intervention, one way or another animals will produce after their own kind.
and remember that most of these species off today did not exist in Noah's time, like four examples most of the dog breeds we have today are a result of human intervention they were not around Noah's time,
@@globalcoupledances can you please just give me one example
@@sifundogumede8883 Read the article. If you want more read the references
I think dinosaurs are still out there in the unexplored!
About dinosaurs, Mr. Sagan suggested Inherited Memories ! ? Passed on through our DNA from our non-human ancestors too? That's an interesting view! Strangely, there might be something about that !!! (no, not about having non-human ancestors). Please don't misunderstand my words! I remember reading or viewing something not too long ago from a Christian viewpoint about God writing himself in our DNA. There might be a UA-cam video about this too (I'll look further to remind myself of where I read that before). So, what Mr. Sagan may be suggesting, has some merit to consider, (though the literal "Inherited memories" theory IS absurd). I only know what my Dad did when he was a child, because he told me. It's not because of some personal experiences he had, that was saved in his DNA and passed on to me at conception.
So, did dinosaurs survive the flood during Noah's time? Yes, I believe so. Land Dinosaurs might have been taken on the ark, if we believe in the story written in the Book of Genesis Ch 7 vs 2. What killed them off? Answer: Man. Over time and even similar to today, man has killed off species, or kinds.
I agree, we're the reason why these big lizards (dinosaurs) went extinct. In fact, we've caused a lot of species of animals to go extinct, mostly by eliminating their habitat. And dinosaurs are in the Bible, (just not actually called that, but dragons, fiery serpents, the great lizard and leviathan etc) and the Israelites did encounter these animals throughout their journey through the wilderness, when they fled from Pharaoh and the Egyptian army. The argument that evolutionists make is, birds "evolved" from dinosaurs, meanwhile they claim they died 65 Million Years ago, thus contradicting themselves. God created all of the birds on day Five of Creation, then on day Six of Creation, He created all of the land animals, including dinosaurs and humans. This would mean that birds couldn't have "evolved" from dinosaurs and our ancestors DID interact with these big lizards. God bless and happy Sabbath.
This doesn't include the amount of fresh water needed to keep all the animals alive.
Oh, and the collective heat and humidity from that many vertebrates in such close quarters within an insulated space (the wooden vessel) would probably cause a lot of heat stroke before long. Remember, humans are one of the only animals that sweat.
Also, the sheer amount of accumulated urine and scat that would be deposited every day would be too much for Noah and his family to clean up. This would result in the waste piling up, increasing the change of disease and infection for much of the ark's denizens. The urine would saturate the place with so much ammonia by the end of the voyage, that much of the animals would have died from ammonia poisoning or asphyxiation.
Even under the most generous conditions, the ark wouldn't work by far.
There are so many problems, irreconcilable problems with the flood/ark story. Supposedly, the ark was afloat for 150 days. So you have all the issues with space, food and water storage, waste removal, methane buildup, etc., but what about after the ark lands? How was food and water supplied for those gazillions of animals? The vegetation needed to feed the ruminant animals would taken AT LEAST an entire season to grow, not even taking into consideration the problem with the salinization of ALL the land. After landing, what did all the predators eat? It's just problem after problem with this entire story, start to finish.
Might as well try and prove red riding hood as true story or Peter Pan.
The skylights running the full length of the ark (as it was)would would provide enough ventilation and can work in conjunction with a high moon pool causing bellows to move the air around and a spare one to use as a means of waste removal using simple wood based machines. Rain water falling on the roof can be collected by bamboo pipes to fill a large amount of clay jars to supplement their water supply. Animals that can hibernate will hibernate and that will save on food and waste issues ,only to wake up once in a while and back to sleep. Most cages most likely had self watering containers and self feeding versions to save on effort and time. Slatted bottoms for quick waste removal.Having around 15,000 different animal types to watch over, very young animals that were still small and not reproducing yet also helps. Everything would have been well thought out in the pre planing stage to make life easier for the 4 men and their wives. There is no need for them to bust their butts from the time God shut them in personally and when they were allowed off. They most likely had a lot of free time on their hands.
Upon landing Noah did not get off for some time. It rained a lot and would quickly remove a lot of salt off the land and freshen the ponds and lakes and the grass would start to grow quickly in a couple weeks it would be graze-able. As for predators, there would be a banquet worth of dead fish and other marine life on the new river banks and shore lines to help with that until the prey animals numbers to grow large enough for the meat eaters natural instincts to kick-in again.
@@wendigos_eat_people7177
I give it to you, that you have spent some time to think about the matter.
Let's calculate this through:
There are 6.5 million land dwelling animal species on Earth which represent about 1% of all animal species that ever existed. (Yes, 4,300 years ago 99% of all species that ever lived on earth were already extinct).
According to the measurements given in the bible most creationist websites calculated the ark with a volume of 50,000 cubic meters. Most of the beforementioned animals are tiny. Therefore we will only count those bigger than a common rat, which leaves us with 50,000 species. Two animals of each species represent 100,000 animals with an average size of a sheep.
If we go by sheer volume we have half a cubic meter per animal on the ark. That's a space of 80cm x 80cm x 80cm for each animal. Roughly enough space for each animal, right?
But wait! This reminds me of the old pro-life claim that all the world population would fit into Texas.
That might be technically true, but that calculation doesn't include infrastructure, farm land, areas for mining, etc.
Making Texas the biggest graveyard in the world.
So we have to take into consideration that these poor animals have some basic needs too:
Water, food (some of them have a very special diet) and waste disposal.
We need space for the infrastructure to distribute food, water and fresh air to the animals and a system to
remove the feces.
The high moon pools you are talking about as well as a ventilation system will need some space.
I am no expert on that, but I think about 20% of the available space (10,000 cubic meter) sounds reasonable.
And then you need a lot of space to store the food to feed 100,000 animals for 7 months.
(Let's ignore the fact that many animal species can't live off dry food and need a very special diet, like meat e.g..
Example: Panda bears eat only bamboo shoots, Koala bears live exclusively off the leaves of the eucalyptus tree.)
Assuming that our animals will eat about 2% of their body weight (0.5kg/animal) on average per day the daily amount of food needed is 50 tons/ day.
Therefore we need 9,500 tons of food for the trip, taking also about 10,000 cubic meter.
Now we are left with 30,000 cubic meters space for the animals (67cm x 67cm x 67cm per animal).
With no space for water tanks (because it's raining all day long, right?)
>> Animals that can hibernate will hibernate and that will save on food and waste issues ,only to wake up once in a while and back to sleep.
Animals hibernate during the winter time in northern countries.
The ark will have stayed in warm waters in order not to have to provide heating to keep everyone warm.
Therefore it is unlikely that animals were hibernating in the ark.
>> Most cages most likely had self watering containers and self feeding versions to save on effort and time.
Which still need to be filled from time to time. A zoo with 5,000 animals has about 200 zoo keepers.
>> They most likely had a lot of free time on their hands.
Imagine a zoo with 100,000 animals with 8 zoo keepers.
How much free time do you think they would have?
>> very young animals that were still small and not reproducing yet also helps.
baby animals have to learn from their parents and siblings how to survive.
There would have been nobody to teach them once they were off the ark.
>> Upon landing Noah did not get off for some time.
It rained a lot and would quickly remove a lot of salt off the land and freshen the ponds and lakes and the grass would start to grow quickly in a couple weeks it would be graze-able.
So we have to add food for at least another two months for 100,000 animals to the equation.
And how long would the rain take to remove the salt from the land? Do you know?
>> As for predators, there would be a banquet worth of dead fish and other marine life on the new river banks and shore lines to help with that until the prey animals numbers to grow large enough for the meat eaters natural instincts to kick-in again.
Do you know how long fish stays fresh enough to serve as food? A few days maximum.
And then the lions have to wait until the sheep have their 3 babies per year to eat them?
There is a reason for why there are a lot more prey animals than hunters.
A lion eats between 5 to 7kg of meat per week.
Have you really calculated all this through well?
And how did the kangaroos get back to Australia?
Riding on the back of a whale?
@@wendigos_eat_people7177
Creationist "scientists" have long ago already come to the same conclusion as me:
That there would not have been enough manpower to feed 100,000 animals, that you can't collect enough rain water or store enough water to water them and that there is no space for food left.
So now they push the story that there were only 5,000 "basic kinds" of animals on the ark which then, after the flood diversified in a hyper accelerated super-fast evolution into the millions of species which live today.
So they hate evolution, but then they propose that post-flood evolution took place at a speed millions of times faster than today. In my opinion this is so dragged in by the hair that compared to that a 900 year old Noah almost sounds realistic.
@@wendigos_eat_people7177
Still working it out?
The canopy theory is the most plausible..
The air pressure was double back then. Jurassic park could never happen. They couldnt breathe...
So after they got off when they reached a certain size they die. And hunted off...
Those “dragons” are not based on dinosaurs, just large reptiles. Dinosaurs have legs underneath their bodies not out to the side.
Humans did walk with dinosaurs. Jobe description
The Dragons let’s me know man and them were together in the past ,thousands of years not millions.
Dragons, unicorns and talking snakes - all thousands of years, not millions.
The great flood!
Very informative!
Very miss informative.
A recently dried concrete block aged same as a fossil which was dated millions of years😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Even if that were true it would make sense since the materials in the concrete are millions of years old
["@hdsamte ["A recently dried concrete block aged same as a fossil which was dated millions of years"]
Let me guess who did the test ...
@@iriemon1796 don't!
Nobody tell you,I free you from that responsibility 😂😂😂😂😂
We know water flooded the earth, covered the highest mountain peak, so what was the water temperature in the valleys , and think about how long the water was on the earth then factor no sunshine, the ice age had alot to do with the extinction of the great beast mentioned in the bible, so yes the flood did bring about the extinction of the dinos.
Swimming creatures migrate along coasts more easily than land bound animals migrate cross country.
Yabba-dabba-doo! Man lived with dinosaurs, period.
@ark encounter this is really great thank you. Could you please put this series in a playlist? ☺
"Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth". Exodus 20:4
Let's calculate this through:
There are 6.5 million land dwelling animal species on Earth which represent about 1% of all animal species that ever existed.
(Yes, 4,300 years ago 99% of all species that ever lived on earth were already extinct).
According to the measurements given in the bible most creationist websites calculated the ark with a volume of 50,000 cubic meters.
Most of the beforementioned animals are tiny. Therefore we will only count those bigger than a common rat, which leaves us with 50,000 species. Two animals of each species represent 100,000 animals with an average size of a sheep.
If we go by sheer volume we have half a cubic meter per animal on the ark. That's a space of 80cm x 80cm x 80cm for each animal.
Roughly enough space for each animal right?
But wait! This reminds me of the old pro-life claim that all the world population would fit into Texas.
That might be technically true, but that calculation doesn't include infrastructure, farm land, areas for mining, etc.
Making Texas the biggest graveyard in the world very quickly.
So we have to take into consideration that these poor animals have some basic needs too:
Water, food (some of them have a very special diet) and waste disposal.
We need space for the infrastructure to distribute food, water and fresh air to the animals and a system to
remove the feces.
The high moon pools you are talking about as well as a ventilation system will need some space.
I am no expert on that, but I think about 20% of the available space (10,000 cubic meter) sounds reasonable.
And then you need a lot of space to store the food to feed 100,000 animals for 7 months.
(Let's ignore the fact that many animal species can't live off dry food and need a very special diet, like meat e.g..
Example: Panda bears eat only bamboo shoots, Koala bears live exclusively off the leaves of the eucalyptus tree.)
Assuming that our animals will eat about 2% of their body weight (0.5kg/animal) on average per day the daily amount of food needed is 50 tons/ day.
Therefore we need 9,500 tons of food for the trip, taking also about 10,000 cubic meter.
Now we are left with 30,000 cubic meters space for the animals (67cm x 67cm x 67cm per animal).
With no space for water tanks (because it's raining all day long, right?)
>> Animals that can hibernate will hibernate and that will save on food and waste issues ,only to wake up once in a while and back to sleep.
Animals hibernate during the winter time in northern countries.
The ark will have stayed in warm waters in order not to have to provide heating to keep everyone warm.
Therefore it is unlikely that animals were hibernating in the ark.
>> Most cages most likely had self watering containers and self feeding versions to save on effort and time.
Which still need to be filled from time to time. A zoo with 5,000 animals has about 200 zoo keepers.
>> They most likely had a lot of free time on their hands.
Imagine a zoo with 100,000 animals with 8 zoo keepers.
How much free time do you think they would have?
>> very young animals that were still small and not reproducing yet also helps.
baby animals have to learn from their parents and siblings how to survive.
There would have been nobody to teach them.
>> Upon landing Noah did not get off for some time.
It rained a lot and would quickly remove a lot of salt off the land and freshen the ponds and lakes and the grass would start to grow quickly in a couple weeks it would be graze-able.
So we have to add food for at least another two months for 100,000 animals to the equation.
>> As for predators, there would be a banquet worth of dead fish and other marine life on the new river banks and shore lines to help with that until the prey animals numbers to grow large enough for the meat eaters natural instincts to kick-in again.
Do you know how long fish stays fresh enough to serve as food? A few days maximum.
And then the lions have to wait until the sheep have their 3 babies per year to eat them?
There is a reason for why there are a lot more prey animals than hunters.
A lion eats between 5 to 7kg of meat per week.
Have you really calculated all this through well?
And how did the kangaroos get back to Australia?
On the back of a whale?
They looked into the future and saw barney the Dinosaur and then couldn’t go on
Not "if" but for how long.
Dinosaurs are millions of years old, that's why there's still soft tissue in their fossils and bones.😂😂😂
No, dinosaurs are millions of years old because the layers of the earth the fossils are found in have been dated. We humans have never found dinosaur soft tissue or bones. 😂
@@donzo5984you are seriously denying evidence, go and research Mary Switzer research on finding soft tissue in dinosaur bones, and you said they were dated can I ask what dating method was used
@@sifundogumede8883, Evidently you didn’t watch Mary Schweitzer’s video where she explains that the soft tissue isn’t tissue.
@davidgardner863 evidently you've never watched it 😂
@@rassoul420 Yes I have.
Heaven not heavens .
Seems logical dinosaurs were around after the flood. As large as many were when grown maybe only the young ones would have been taken on the ark. Some of the dragon stories of ancient times were probably true but over time humans might have seen them as being a little different. I'm not sure the fire breathers were real. Pterodactyls would have been the flying dragons. No one is alive now that were around when the dinosaurs were so all we have to go on is fossil records.
There are many misinformation in this video for 1. Dragons never existed they are exaggerating by people who are mentally unstable. 2. Dinosaurs never lived near or next to humans many depictions of so called “dinosaurs “ are actually the animals we see in real life. And 3. There is something called Pangea were all 6 continents collid into one super continent so obviously animals migrate to those areas before the continents split. And 4th there was no Ice age at the time that Noah’s ark landed on mount Ararat and it’s impossible for two animals to repopulate the earth
Really?
@ yes really
Plenty of dragon, aka dinosaur illustrations, including some of his own, show dinosaurs with wings. So much to my surprise, this proves that birds developed from dinosaurs.
👍
Lizards not, birds yes.
😻
necks weren't long enough to reach above all that water. They Drownded, ya hear?
Why go through the trouble of saving the animals just to have most of them go extinct shortly afterwards?
Because of man many animals have gone extinct, like for example the Tasmanian tiger.
@@Alex-Trejo These Christian's say dinosaurs went extinct from issues unrelated to man's actions.
@@KING_of_the_WILD It's a combination of man and other things that contributes to animals going extinct.
Ancient humans found dinosaur bones all over the world. That's how dragon myths were created. Imagine making a 15min video and not addressing this most obvious explanation, instead coping how humans and dinosaur had to coexist to desperately "prove" Bible not being full of...
So ancient people were doing archaeological reconstruction? HAHA : )
I believe in the Lord and hereditary DNA memory. 💯🙏💯
Heredity DNA…..Adams fall into sin. 😉
@@TheSaintFrenzy Exactly! (🤭)
Satan tranformed himself into a dragon
"If Sagan uses the words "dinosaurs" and "dragons" interchangeably, in stories from folke-tales, then surely they must have existed in resent times".
So when it comes to proof, the bar is lowered dramatically when it suits Calvin Smith.
While - of course - no amount of proof is good enough, when it comes to evolution.
Can Calvin, himself, see the problem in that?
(But of course not...)
The word dinosaur is used in folk tales? : ).
@@calvinsmith7575 The word "Dinosaur" was invented in 1842 by the paleontologist Richard Owen: "The combination of such characters ... will, it is presumed, be deemed sufficient ground for establishing a distinct tribe or sub-order of Saurian Reptiles, for which I would propose the name of Dinosauria*. (*Gr. δεινός, fearfully great; σαύρος, a lizard. ... )".
Fossilized bones of dinosaurs were suggested by Chinese to be bones of dragons, as far back as a couple of thousand years. Nobody has described seeing any animal, alive or as anything other than fossilized bones - unlike other big animals like mammoths, which we have proof were hunted and not just part of folk legends. Folk legends do not constitute proof of existence, any more than winged horses, unicorns, cyclops or mermaids.
Creationists should consider if worldwide mass extinctions happened catastrophically several hundred years after the Flood. The Belt Supergroup rock layers in the Rocky Mountains have low grade metasedimentary rock layers. This requires heat. They do not appear to have Flood sediments lying on these low grade metasedimentary rock layers. This suggests metamorphism happened after the Flood. Also, the valleys east of the Belt Supergroup have “tertiary” lake beds that contain lignite. Lignite is a low grade of coal that forms at temperatures up to about 100° C (212° F). How did the lignite lake beds form in these valleys if hot temperatures are needed? A simple explanation is that metamorphism happened after the Flood when mountains were uplifted. This explains the low-grade metamorphism of the Rocky Mountains and the lignite in the "tertiary" lake beds in the valleys. This also suggests that ice age features were formed catastrophically when mountains were uplifted during worldwide volcanic and metamorphic activity. This explains why so many plants and animals are extinct.
>> Did the Dinosaurs Survive the Biblical Flood?
Easy question and can be answered in 2 Sentences:
1.) Non-avian dinosaurs were long extinct before the biblical flood.
2.) And the birds had no problem with it because the flood didn't happen.
yeah i guess that makes griffins and sphinx real too.
Do we have skeletons of griffins and shinxs? No? Oh well I guess your comment is moot.... : )
@@calvinsmith7575 not really. It was a counter to people making art based on mythical creatures. He was implying that people saw live dinosaurs back in the day not saying they were depicting dragons based off of fossils.
I was considering going back to Christianity and this video did more harm than good. This guy is so far off the real facts it’s asinine.
This is a joke.....there were no dinosaurs on the ark....no penguins, either. This dude needs to reconsider his interpretation of the scriptures, and how Jesus created, and designed, how our universe works.
Noah's flood hopefully never happened. If it did, then god committed genocide, not a nice thing. And getting advice on paleontology from a pastor is like getting medical advice from a car mechanic.
Judging the guilty is not genocide- its justice...
@@calvinsmith7575 So, if Noah's flood occurred, then Babies were drowned, even unborn fetuses were killed. From your perspective, they were guilty. Guilty of doing what? Please be precise. I am interested in learning how killing an unborn can be justified.
I have a copy of "The Dragons of Eden" and, at best, a very poor interpretation, and, at worst, just flat out dishonest. This was easily his least scientifically rigorous work, and he makes this clear. This was obviously a whimsical thought experiment about some of the oddities and coincidences regarding dreams and innate human fears. NOTHING was ever meant to be taken as scientific outside of the data sets he used occasionally to base his hypotheticals off of.
And as long as you're sending people off to query biologists, they should also inquire as to their thoughts on dinosaurs being contemporaries of homosapiens, a worldwide flood, age of the earth, or how two of all species and seven of each "clean" species of animals could exist with only a single window, managed by only eight people, on a wooden craft that couldn't possibly hold together at sea for over a year.
But why wouldn't you bother asking biologists or considering anything Carl Sagan had to say if they are so undoubtedly wrong? Your claims should stand on their own merits. But because they cannot, you must try to have real learned people both ways. They're either worthy of regard or they're not.
That's exactly all of what the story of evolution is- a whimsical thought experiment. Stop gaslighting please...
@@calvinsmith7575 Name 1 new species that god has created within the last 100 years and proof that god did it.
@@VisshanVis
He wrote an ENTIRE BOOK and that was his best interpretation. Your protectionist attitude is pretty lame... : )
@@calvinsmith7575 Still doesn't prove that "god did it" sounds more like you just proved exactly how evolution works.
I'm going to guess that none of the people who produced this video have ever had migraine problems.
Have you? What's a migraine? 😂
People with migraines rarely have the energy to devote to rational original research or thought. Ask me how I know.
Correct
If sauropods were aquatic, they would be seen standing on the highest point with water up to their shoulders.
how would humans co-existing with dinosaurs lead to evolution being seen as "dead in the water"? why can't both evolution and humans co-existing with dinosaurs be true? I'm genuinely curious!
Evolution says dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago and that man evolved 5 million years ago- that's how...
JESUS IS LORD GOD IS GOOD NOAH RODE ON A T REX
A T-Rex would be very useful for pulling a load of heavy trees .
The most recent ice age didn’t lower the sea level enough for the platypus to crawl from the mountains of Ararat to Australia. The most recent ice age thawed 11,000-12,000 years ago. The Noah’s ark story is claimed to have taken place around 4,000 years ago. BTW the most recent ice age thawed 4,000-5,000 years before AIG’s universe was created.
All according to highly dubious evolutionary interpretations... : )
eeeeeeh they aren't extinct, why don't he mention Nessie over in scotland? or the over 90 sightings of pteradon's here in North Carolina, or the one over in the amazon?
Got a pic? : )
One day they will find fossils and geologic layers which support your theory. One day.
I doubt it
doubt it. Human bodies tend to float and be eaten and their bones dissolve, If a mile high tsunami were to fall on you, you most likely turn to goo, think Oceangate and what happen when their submersible imploded.
Talk about a malformed question, proposing a false dichotomy 😂😅😂
Genesis 10:25... To Eber were born two sons:the name of the one was Peleg,for in his days the earth was divided;and his brother's name was Joktan.
That took place somewhere around the tower of Babel,and the earth was connected in one land mass untill that time. You can see that there are some big fosill grave yards in south-west Africa (one part) and the "continuation" of the same graveyard in south-east America... so,cangaroos floated away on the raft called "Australia"😅😂😂😂
Humans are 100k years old as far as we can tell. Dinosaurs lived about 60 million years ago. So it’s impossible for a human to have seen one. And with dragons, it’s not hard to understand that humans have thought up countless creatures in their mythology. Hardly mind bending to think of a big scary reptile.
@@joefriday2275 So it’s 10 years old and also 2.8 million?? Explain please Joe….
@@TheAArmstrong A sample from the 1980s Mt St Helens eruption was sent to the lab in the 1990s. They dated the rock at 2.8 million years old.
Same with Hawaiian rock, New Zealand rock. ALL rock of known age has been incorrectly dated.
So I think its ridiculous when they say tiktaalik is 375 million years old, or dinosaurs died 60 million years ago.
@@joefriday2275 Which lab?? A creationist one??
I always thought and believed that the flood killed most dinosaurs….like they never got in Noah’s ark.
The whole world wasn’t flooded
Yay! Another story time with Dr. Calvin! Spinning the poetry of Sagan into bible code in our DNA!? Whatever that overrated mental midget Sagan was getting at - it sounded like a quote - he wasn't challenging the antiquity of dinos, nor validating past-life memories. If anything, he might say that genetic imprinting of threats of large(r) reptiles dates back to the age of dinos or far beyond. That means the eyes that beheld the beasts weren't human. The only humans known to have contended with relatively giant dragons were the tiny 'hobbits' of Flores Island, which was crawling with Komodo dragons (not our ancestors).
I'm just chillin until comments open on the AIG 9/3 stream on the matching dino prints astride the ocean. I've already looked at the new paper by Dr. Louis Jacobs (Dr. Calvin turned me on to him). The research behind the study and conclusions is exhaustive. Spoilers: Don't get your hopes up: Dr. Jacobs isn't challenging the antiquity of dinos, either. Far from it. Actually, it was the Pangaea breakup and opening of the Atlantic. That took a minute!
@@joefriday2275 Textbook psychological projection. You should see somebody about that.
'All there has ever been.' I don't know the context, but it sounds like a simple statement everybody can agree with.
@@joefriday2275 Textbook psychological projection. Look it up. You might want to see somebody about that.
He didn't say that it had no beginning, did he?. He knew about Hubble's finding and all the other physics at the time. He just said it's all that's ever been. Hypothetical multiverses and magical mythical deities aside, seems about right. Right?
Shows how fundamentalists believe what they want, without any facts to support it. Instead, they cherry-pick quotes out of context to 'prove' it.
right now there are 666 views on this video, scary
Is it as scary now? : )
The only dinosaurs to ever live with humans are birds. They are the only dinosaurs the ancients saw and they're the only dinosaurs alive today. 🤦♂️
If birds are dinosaurs, so are fish. I think there's a lot of difference between birds and dinosaurs. I realize that a lot of evolutionists are going to disagree with me, and will say it doesn't matter what I think.
@@OlegLankin Birds are Ornithurae. Ornithurae are Theropods. Theropods are Dinosaurs. So Birds are Dinosaurs
And roaches, and mosquitoes
@@globalcoupledances you can list a bunch of names in a classification system invented by (ahem, totally unbiased) evolutionists. That's surely proof of your point.
I have another one for you. Protozoa means early life. Therefore, because the name means that, we can know that these were some the earliest forms of life. That's proof for you.
@OlegLankin - Creationist Linnaeus made the classification system. And earliest life came long before Protozoa. It took billions years of evolution
Do people really believe this trash?
It's not about belief, it about a more sensual theory.
I prefer to originate from God than a puddle of primordial soup
@@hdsamte That doesn't mean its true
@@klouis1886 the alternative is more trivial
@@hdsamte There could be other explanations besides just two
@@hdsamteorigins of life have nothing to do with whether or not dinosaurs lived with humans or not. We have a stratigraphic column. The column is layered like books stacked on top of each other. So we divided them into sections. The Jurassic period is younger than the Triassic period that lies underneath it. And so on and so on. In those rocks we have fossils that date back 4 billion years, but evidence for complex life didn’t come for till about 600 million years ago. Don’t you see? We have a column of rocks, in those rocks we have fossils; in those fossils you will never, ever, ever find a human fossil in the Jurassic period in the Column and vice versa you will never find a dinosaur at the very top of the Holocene era. (The one we’re living in right now)
This is pure comedy...
Why?
The story of evolution? Absolutly! : )
Did animals that went extinct 65 million years ago survive something that didn't happen? Dinosaurs existed for about 165 million years and they didn't all live in the some time period, either. Do you mean all the dinosaurs? Just the last ones to go extinct?
@@joefriday2275 What exactly is millions of years nonsense?
@@joefriday2275 We have several methods by which to test things. And they work. What's the relativity of rubidium?
@@joefriday2275 Is my reply not satisfying, Mister millions of years nonsense?
@@taylorthetunafish5737are you a scientist?
@@markwarne5049 Are you plumber?
What Ark flood there was no freaking world biblical flood.
2Pet 3:3-7: "First of all you must understand this: In the last days mockers will come and, following their own desires, will ridicule us by saying, "What happened to the Messiah's promise to return? Ever since our ancestors died, everything continues as it did from the beginning of creation." But they deliberately ignore the fact that long ago the heavens existed and the earth was formed by God's word out of water and with water, by which the world at that time was deluged with water and destroyed. Now by that same word, the present heavens and earth have been reserved for fire and are being kept for the day when ungodly people will be judged and destroyed."
@@batobalaganov5494 That doesn't mean anything. This is a simple fact that we have absolutely no evidence to back this up, but we do have a folk lore story that this was based on. But its not real and never was meant to be real. You guys are just taking old Jewish folk and projecting them as if they really happened.
@@batobalaganov5494, When you believe a myth is real, you should expect to be mocked.
@@Arminius420 It's not the matter of evidence because there's plenty of it(in here and at Creation ministries). It's a problem of heart. I used to be like this too. I used to promote Darwinism. I just didn't want that God and I basicaly put my hands over my ears and yelled:"I don't believe it". Deep inside however I knew and I argued with God's voice. Reality is stubborn and doesn't care about my atittude towards it. Trust me, better not fool oneself because you will only have to blame yourself at the end. This is both tragic and horrifing experience that I wouldn't wish upon anybody. God is awesome and He opens up to truly objective people.
@@Arminius420 Evolution is indoctrination, there is absolutely no proof, just people putting things that look similar together in a family tree and calling it proof....these people would claim if they found the stages of a frogs development from birth to adult hood, fossilized in rock, that it would show evolution, from fish to land animal.
No, they died out millions of years ago.
Oh, and there wasn’t a worldwide flood 🤦🏻♂️
Anything else we should all know?
@@OlegLankin don’t give aig any of your money
@@RealHooksy 👌🏻. When I get some, I was actually thinking of doing that. But now maybe I'll reconsider.
No flood? So you believe mankind is 100,000 years old? Or older? Or younger? Which is it? Please do say...
Then you'll see the flood really happened.
@@marcj3682 no flood
*Noah didn't take enough food on the Ark & had to eat something. That's why there is no more Dinosaurs. It took too long after landing for plants to grow, they had to eat something.*
Please watch the previous episodes of the series.
Watch the series before commenting...
🥹🍽🦖
the dinosaurs went extinct 65 milion years ago
Dinosaurs went extinct closer to 5 and a half thousand years ago.
You sure it isn't 65 trillion?
No, they didn't...
Dinosaurs lived from 243 to 66 million years ago. Dinosaurs are not in the Bible, but many animals are not found in the Bible.
Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today.
The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
Sunrise to sunset
Sunset to next sunset
Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast.
Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens”
The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours.
Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 asks you to?
Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
No, they didn't...
@@calvinsmith7575 evidence?
People just imagined large animals. That explains your dragon myths.
Lord, hear my prayer: If Thou art paying attention, Thou dost know that Thy Book of Genesis contains an account of Thy creation and the origins of Thy people which straineth credulity. Thou hast laid before us the wonders and mystery of the Earth, which we have used and abused and exploited, all in accordance with Thy alleged word and covenant. Verily, we multiplied like our distant cousins, the bunny rabbits, until we can't feed everyone, even with Thy blessed petroleum-based fertilizers and powerful pesticides. We have trampled and poisoned almost all that is good, and ruined the climate Thou didst provide for us. All thy other holy Kinds are dying off, and we seem to be next.
But thou didst bless us with curiosity, and we hast looked upon the Book of Nature and discerned its manifest meaning. It hath taught the wise that Genesis didn't happen quite as Thou did'st tell it. Now division, strife, and frankly, contempt toward Thy truest believers are abroad in the land. I beseech thee to set your confused children straight, that peace may reign and science go about its business.
Full disclosure, Lord: I've been a committed atheist since age 11, and been steadfast and devoted in my lack of faith, lo, these fifty years. I detest all charlatans, demagogues, other purveyors of ignorance and conspiracy theorists and pray that they might return to Thy true path. In that spirit, I willingly offer my life in hopes of restoring some level of sanity. Send thee to them a sign, that all may know of thy Truth. If they be correct, and Thy inspired word was intended to be taken seriously, then I doth pray Thee to strike me down, even unto death, that all should know that Thou dost not mess around or tolerate anything but slavish devotion in Thy beloved children. A lightening bolt would do the trick, but Thy will be done. OK, I'm ready... Any time now...
Look, I'm dead serious here! I disbelieve in thee and thy bible, and fear thee not. Go ahead, smite me silly! Show the heathens the error of their ways. Do it! I dare thee! Thou wouldst be doing me a favor! Thy believers art idiots! Thou sucketh! Do it! I deserve it, trust me! Thou art nothing, a hoax, a fraud, a myth, a meme, a delusion! A loser and a coward! Do it! I'd spit upon Thy holy countenance if given half a chance. What the hell's Thy problem? Smite!
Well, I think that settles it. Let it be written: I stand unsmitten!
Amen
Dinos were extinct LONG before your global flood never happened.
Evidence………….?
@@thunderous-one Fossil record.
@@MrWeezer55 I agree there are fossils, but I have yet to see a chain of intermediary incremental transitions (male/female) of ANY creature evolving into another?
Fish are supposed to have evolved into amphibians, thus, where is the fossil record of both male/female fish evolving………
Backbone evolving into shoulders/arms/wrists/fingers?
Backbone evolving into hips/thighs/legs/ankles/toes?
The evolution of the from fish head to amphibian head?
Suffice I could go on, but if I have missed these fossils of both male/female fish simultaneously evolving the required body re engineering, then please point me to the actual evidence.
Cunning linguistics and artistic impression do not serve as evidence.
@@thunderous-one If you were even remotely interested in finding the answers your questions, you would put them to competent specialists in the appropriate fields of scientific research instead of aimlessly posting them in a YT comment. Any paleontologist or evolutionary biologist could answer such extremely rudimentary questions with remarkableease, so that you might even be inclined to reconsider your poistion (though I seriously doubt that you would do so).
@@MrWeezer55 - _"Fossil record."_
*No. The fossil record was created during the Flood - not before... not after.*
Nothing in this video proves that God exists or the Bible is true
Looking in the mirror does. Nothing comes from nothing. With creation, there must be a creator. I'm not trying to argue, just stating what makes logical sense to me.
It will never not be hilarious that there are adults who actually believe the myths in the bible were real events.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
a modern freakshow
After you die, it won't be hilarious to you 😂😂😂
@@Alex-Trejo No, I'll be dead. My body will decompose and the atoms that make it up will return to the universe that made them!
Sorry you feel that way but you are wrong… try reading it for sometime and see what happens
@@hibkanit2491 Reading the bible with a critical mind is what made me an atheist.