A major thing for me is that Maxwell was the last generation of Nvidia GPUs to have a DVI-I/A with a proper RAMDAC for CRT monitors. I use a 980Ti on a WinXP32 gaming machine to play games from the 1998-2006 era with modded drivers. I have a DVI-I to VGA adapter on it and the image is absolutely crisp on 2D games. Maxwell will probably go down in history to have the best analog VGA quality ever. The RAMDAC on it can drive a large CRT to really high refresh without artifacts -- an issue I experience with "period correct" hardware. On the display port, I use a 1920x1200 LCD to properly scale 4:3-only games to 1600x1200.
@@philscomputerlab I would love a video on comparing analog VGA output quality on old video cards. I remember that RAMDAC MHz was a big marketing thing back then.
Yeah, for Nvidia. XP support cuts off with dx9 though, unless dxvk, and AMD had the better native dx9 hardware. I wonder if AMD's 290/390 cards work. Anything above a 960 is pretty much overkill for XP era games anyway. Not to mention there's actually no reason to run XP or XP hardware when the games are fully compatible with modern Windows and hardware. Only 9x is really worth having a dedicated box, because of specific hardware and software locked to 9x. You can emulate 3dfx glide, not powervr, not virge, not aureal3d. Descent 3 also has specific effects locked to a pentium 3. As a final note GOG does NOT support installing on XP/9x, and if you look at their history, the installers were encrypted to block Linux for a good while. So GOG was deliberately blocking you from using their versions on retro PCs and Linux. Outside of workarounds. They're not what they pretend to be.
@@JohnDoe-ip3oq What would they have to gain from blocking linux I honestly wonder. Like it would be one thing if their games and/or the way they make them work on modern windows just happens to run into issues with linux, but intentional encryption is another issue altogether.
Hey, Phill. Just some new information for XP users. Nvidia Drivers 344.11 (which are XP only), they support both GTX 970 and 980 by default. No need to mod them. Althou, Nvidia page doesn't show them in official list, driver files contain all information needed to instal it in legacy way :) Cheers!
Hey, I have a Quadro K620 and I can't get it to work right. I installed an older driver than this but I'm having major issues. For example Minecraft is telling me "No OpenGL context found" and that I have bad drivers. Do you know if this supports the k620 and if this would solve my issue?
Heh, I appreciate the shout-out. Wasn't expecting that and glad to help. I've not tried patching drivers for Windows XP yet because my WinXP retro gaming PC is running a GTX 460 and seems to work but I have a GTX 650 Ti in a different machine that could benefit from this patching technique. Thank you!
Awesome video as always. Quadro M6000 has so much untapped potential for gaming, I'm glad this channel continues pushing its retro technology to its limits.
Yeah. Disable hyper-threading and turn off two of the cores, you'll get a 4.4GHz beast with the 4790K. Especially when you couple a very fast SSD with it. And later, if you can get your hands on it, compare the performance difference between the Quadro M6000 and the GTX Titan X.
Totally agree on hyperthreading, no XP game should benefit from it and some might even get slower. But I don't see why disabling cores, turning it into the equivalent of a Pentium G with more cache would be useful. I'd just keep all cores on, turning it into an i5, should give the performance and width to run basically everything.
I used the exact same procedure to get my FX 5900 ZT up and running on Windows 98 with the 45.23 driver recently. That version was released a full 13 years before 368.81, so I guess Nvidia never considered it worth blocking people from doing this.
They haven't bothered to change the control panel UI in 23+ years either. Kind of sad when you consider the RTX 4090 has the same control panel interface that the Riva TNT2 did. More so because it wasn't even good back then either.
@@bdhale34 Even on a relatively modern machine (roughly the same age as the hardware used in this video) the control panel is still laggy and unresponsive at times, too. Like, are you kidding me?
Love all the 9x & xp content! I might have to get one if those first my High-end xp rig. It's got a i7 4790, 4gb ram, gtx 960 2gb and S/blaster xf-i SB0820 My lower end rig for older stuff is a pentium 4 650, 1gb ram, 8800gts 640mb and S/blaster SB0410
Another Great Video. Thank you for this, It's given me some ideas for a future XP build. I'm currently rocking 2 x GTX 295 in my XP beast. Not that it even needs that. Honetly I mostly play games from 1997 to 2010 at the latest. Modern stuff is almosted wasted on me.
Wew 2x gtx 295 is quite power hungry. When using a single gpu die on the gtx 295 a gtx 750 ti is about 45% faster it seems. Personally I'd probably go with a gtx 950 rather then the 960 if I'm going with an overkill build. Though my dell inspiron 6000 laptop does play the games id want too run every once in a while just fine. Pentium m @ 1.5 ghz 1.5 gb ram & ati x300 graphics, for colin mcrae 1 for example. (900 series for a bit better display & dsr support & lower powerdraw then something like a gtx 460 or 770) Specially for earlier era games it's basically almost all cpu anyway unless you are running nglide,dgvoodoo emulation at like 4k resolution or 1440p in some games.
Another tip I forgot to mention in my previous comment, I highly recommend all retro WinXP builds also have a Win7/10/11 drive or partition as well in a dual boot setup with the networking disabled in WinXP which is insecure now and shouldn't be connected to the internet. Having a modern Windows drive or partition to boot into provides some very important functions: 1) The ability to safely use the internet and download software, game installers, and other files straight into the WinXP drive or partition 2) The ability to run SSD TRIM commands on the WinXP drive or partition 3) The ability to perform any necessary maintenance tasks on the WinXP drive or partition such as drive imaging, cloning, virus scanning, etc. It's good to find a dual purpose for the WinXP machine. With an i7, 16GB RAM, a 980 Ti, and modern Windows support, it is a waste not to do anything with it. I have my "retro" (it's actually in a modern case) build running on Win10 as a dedicated file server and HTPC as its regular job, and boot into the WinXP and Win7 drives if necessary to run old programs and games. The 980 Ti is modern enough to have fan-stop and idle downclocking so it doesn't even make noise or use any more power than a low end GPU most of the time, but I wouldn't use a much older GPU for such a purpose as they used to be loud powerhogs at idle. In fact a 980 Ti can play most older games without even turning the fans on (or barely) and barely clocking up, making it straight up objectively better than a cheaper period-correct blow dryer power sucking GPU even if you think you don't need something that powerful for old games.
Retro machines are usually offline, no Internet connection. Trim is interesting. I spoke to SSD manufacturers and they assured me the modern drives do all this on their own.
@@philscomputerlab Yes, my point is by dual booting a modern OS, you can get them online and not have to go through the hassle of ferrying over files via USB drives or whatever people are doing. SSDs do internal garbage collection, but there are still benefits from OS TRIM commands. Though since SSDs don't run full speed under XP anyway, I doubt it will every be a major issue unless the SSD is an older model. Check out the following article: Ask Ars: “My SSD does garbage collection, so I don’t need TRIM… right?”
@@firstlast55555 Good points! A simple Live Linux would do the trick also. Yea that's what team group and crucial told me, but who knows. Maybe things have progressed? I've heard if Tiny10 or a similar name, a small footprint windows 10.
stop spreading this bullshit, you don't just magically instantly gain thousands of rootkits, viruses, and malware because you connected an outdated operating system to the internet unless you make the absolutely INSANE decision to connect it DIRECTLY to the internet without any kind of firewall between it and the internet, which you shouldn't do with ANY operating system, even a modern up to date one, if you have even an older router with a firewall though (which you should, no device should ever be connected directly to the WAN like that other then the router/firewall) it's absolutely fine though, just use an adblocker and avoid sketchy websites, just like you would on a modern os
I remember doing something similar to this to get Quadro drivers running on Geforce cards. The Quadro cards were always so much more expensive than the equivalently Geforce card, and apparently the only difference is the drivers.
You can use wineD3D for windows or onecore api to make WXP run modern games provided that it uses upto vc redist 2012-2015. You could probably keep an entire pc offline with XP installed just for the sole purpose of running gog games. I got the latest build of chromium running on windows xp under onecore api which is a patch not too dissimilar to kernelEX for w95-2k.
nice, you gotta love those quaddros and a little file editing. my newest xp build is a q9450/780i with two gtx 960, just have to get the sli enabled. after ill try a couple 980 ti.
Thanks! I got a 1680v2, Rampage IV Extreme, 8x4gb 2000mhz ram, Creative Xfi Titanium Fatal1ty, and Titan X build I’m trying to get set up on Windows Xp as an ultimate XP/ 7 dual boot build. At some point I’m gonna get another Titan X for SLI
@@philscomputerlab I was on Vogons researching “the theoretical ultimate Xp build” years ago and ever since I slowly have been finding deals and putting it together. I got it all put together finally, once I get some free time I just gotta get the OS and drivers installed to finally test it out.
If I were going to attempt building an XP rig, I'd go with a Z390 Dark with an i9-9900K, 2-way Titan X (Maxwell) SLI setup, and Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium HD or ASUS Xonar Essence ST(X) sound card.
You are spot on with the 4th gen Intel. After your earlier video on using this 3770 I put together a WinXP supercomputer using some leftover parts. Core i5 4690k. That is 4 cores (no hyperthread) with a mild overclock of 4.0GHz all core and DDR3 1600. Thew in a Dell OEM SB xFi titanium (SB880) and an AMD Radeon 6950 1GB card. I'm contemplating getting a 2nd matching 6950 for crossfire but I'm not sure yet if I want to deal with lag and stutter because the current setup is so silky smooth. Best part about the 6950 is that it uses has port which can output 1080p at 165Hz! (A 6950 is about the same performance as a 750ti)
You're spot on about newer games, I'd say that most AAA-games since around 2016-18 are WAY over-produced? (I've played with PC's since 1980's, perspective helps sometimes;) So GOG saves a day in here too. Most games played in here are still from 1995-2015; Civ4/FalloutNV/etc and heavily modded. I'd say that sweet spot for XP-gaming GPU's is about nvidia gtx750ti/760, 770 runs too hot and gtx900-series is still often expensive for just casual retrogaming. AMD equivalent would be HD7000-series, especially 7750/7770/7850/7870-ones are quite nice. Speaking of CPU's, I'd select unlocked Intel 3000 or 4000 K-series and disable possible hyperthreading to lower temperatures. 3570k/3770k/4570k/etc. Some XP-era games can actually utilize 4 cores, but HT is useless with XP unless you have just 2-core/4-thread CPU. Btw, have you tested VGA-card overclocking with DOS-games like we did in 90's? If I remember correctly it helped quite a bit with Cirrus 542x/543x and S3-cards at the time.
Don't both have the SLI connector? Should be possible to use them in SLI. Now the benefit of running dual GK110 or quad GK104 under XP is a different question.
Phil you are Amazing as usual!! I have some older motherboard combos that I play around with and i found that even win10 will work on many of them too. There is a certain rambus board I want to get someday but they are very scarce and downright expensive too! It would be nice to see what could run on these old boards besides win 95/98 but I never got that far because the board died on me. It was an ASUS P4T 533-R and I still have 2 sticks of Rambus 4800 32 bit which this stuff was very fast memory indeed.
I have an Intel D850GBAL socket 423 motherboard that i picked up a few years back as new old stock. I have it paired with 2GB PC800 RDRAM and a 1.9ghz P4. I used a PCI Sata card to enable use of an SSD and have tried a few different O/S. Windows 200 is my preferred and it runs flawlessly. XP is fine and runs reasonably well. Windows 7 was painful and i havent tried windows 10 yet. With windows 7 the CPU was pegged to 100% usage. I may give it another shot at some point once i finish a few other projects off (i have 3 socket 478, a 939, an AM2, 2 1366 and a 2011 all in various stages of completion).
Vanilla Windows XP (so the first release) does not support SATA if I remember correctly. You need a floppy with SATA drivers or maybe a USB stick (not sure). Also, Ivy Bridge HEDT is also supported on Windows XP.
Phil thanks for the useful information. As always very useful in practice. Maybe some day i will finally build ultimate XP/Vista DX9/DX10 PC powerful enough to run late DX9 and early DX10 titles
Very similar to my Retro XP PC. Mine is an i5-3570K, 8GB RAM DDR3 1600MHz (cause I dual boot WinXP/Win10), GTX 750 Ti, Creative X-Fi and the same Crucial SSD!
The only thing that makes that a "retro" set up is the fact that Microsoft build their modern and crappy OSes to deliberately lock out and "overbloat" set ups like that - I am using similar set ups to that, even Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad machines as perfectly good daily driver machines under Linux. Because I gave up on AAA gaming about a decade ago when "games as a service" kicked off, I don't need newer hardware than what you have there anyway - plus this age of hardware is extremely cheap on eBay at the moment due to the "mindless muppets" upgrading their PCs ready for Windows 11. But no complaints from me, I'll happily buy up there "hardware cast-offs".
I'm running a Core 2 as almost daily driver as well. It's my media system to have alongside the stronger gaming one. And with the hardware upgrade coming soon, the old system probably turns into pretty much the same op has there.
The Nvidia Quadro m6000 is super expensive. I don’t know if the price went up after your video but they appear to be very sought after, at the same time there are lots of them available. Gtx 980 ti is also quite pricey, and the 960 is almost affordable. I found an ASUS gtx 950m for my Shuttle xpc at £21 but it needed a new fan (£8)This was a good find as they are generally quite a lot more. It’s useful for ipx cases with a low power draw and good performance. I’m glad to hear that it’s compatible with Windows xp. Thx.
Used to do that when upgrading my beloved ASRock 4Core Dual-VSTA from my 6800 Ultra to accept a 7600GT AGP, then a 8800 PCIe under XP. Also rolled my own 1080p EDID settings to force FullHD on a 15" 1024x768 CRT. - _Mr. Squint_
I had that board...it allowed me to upgrade to 775 and still use my x1950 GT AGP, which I loved. I used that board with many different CPU and GPU. I also ended up on an 8800GT PCIe lol
@@AaronHendu I liked it so much I recently bought one (1str one fried) and upgraded it to a Q6600, very nice in spite of the slight FSB reduction. I also have the SATA version. _Certifiably nutz._
Love seeing the older tech vids. I would like to update my XP build a bit more, but I am rocking a i72600k with 4gb ddr3 1600mhz, gtx 960, Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS Platinum, and a asus board forget the number off hand. Works well at 1280x1024 @ 60fps... no problems really at all, but a bit better cpu would be kinda cool! Keep up the great work Phil!
The 2600K is already close to the limit of what has drivers for XP. You could get a 2700K or 3770K, as that is already the last platform with official XP drivers. And those are maybe 3-5% faster at best. But the oc headroom on these chips is still immense. I'm running my 3570K on 4.3 GHz and my DDR3-1600 on 2133. Seen a bunch of 2500K/2600K/2700K hit 5 GHz back then. You could easily get 20-30% more out of that i5 in those pesky low-threaded, CPU demanding games.
Oh geese, SSAA and the whole resolution beyond what is displayed was a whole rabbit hole for me many years ago now. Different combinations of SS and MS AA, NVidia super-resolution, just custom resolutions that the GPU scaled, and different injector ulitilies. I remember there were multiple spreadsheets and forum posts with tables that gave guidelines which combination of AA and SSAO (a shadowing thing) was best or problematic for which game. By far the best method was some injection utility that I don't remember the name of unfortunately (some kind of scaler maybe...). It could separate the UI layer from the rendering, and that way the UI could remain crisp being drawn to the native resolution without any forced AA, and the 3D rendered part could be superscaled. The drawback was, that you had to write specific configs for each game (depending on the game, this was not so difficult as you might presume), and the supported DirectX version was either capped at, or only 9. But more relevant to you: I have been forcing SSAA on games back in the day with my Geforce 750 Ti, so it should be available with other Geforce cards too. If you don't find it in the NVidia control panel, try the nvidiaInspector utility. It is an alternative UI for driver settings with more options.
Tweaking the drivers looks similar to when I had to modify Nvidia drivers for my Alienware M17X R3 to upgrade from a GTX 580M to a GTX 880M GPU in Windows 7. Never thought you could do it for WinXP but it makes sense.
The last few month i am playing the Gothic series on a 775 system with ddr1 and agp slot using windows xp. 1680x1050 is doable with a Radeon 2600 xt. really enjoying that.
Oh, I have a (dead) board with that port combination with some freakish SiS chipset. Would make for some interesting benchmark scaling setup, but sadly dead.
True but the Titan XP is a higher performance tier card and only one generation older than the 2080 and they both do not support Windows XP. You will need a Titan X Maxwell to get the best performance in Windows XP.
The peak performance for GPUs are oficially the GTX 960 and GTX 780 Ti. The 780 Ti is faster, but the 960 is more efficient and offers newer features. On the Radeon side the newest ones are Rx 200 cards, so R9 290X. But as shown, more powerful cards of (nearly) the same architecture would also work.
R9 280/280X are the last XP supported models, R9 290/290X are not. There are some drivers floating around the net claiming XP support for R9 290/290X but that simply is not true. There are no "AMD67B0" and "AMD67B1" entries in "Localizable Strings" section of the corresponding INF; no entries, no support. PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_67B0 = R9 290X (Hawaii XT, GCN 2.0) PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_67B1 = R9 290 (Hawaii PRO, GCN 2.0) AMD6810 and AMD6811 entries descibed as "AMD Radeon R9 200 Series" can be found, though. PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_6810 = R9 370X (Trinidad XT, GCN 1.0) PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_6811 = R9 370, R9370 OEM (Trinidad PRO, GCN 1.0) R9 370 is is about 5-10% less capable than, while R9 370X is on par with R9 270X. Just had to say that :D
Windows XP does not get along with modern display outputs (Display port or HDMI) I've found out at high resolution video gets errors and I couldn't get any refresh rate higher than 60hz. Using a Titan X with modified drivers. Display shows up as a TV. I was able to achieve was 1080p at 60hz on my Alienware OLED 175hz monitor via DP or HDMI.
Finally, I found one on UA-cam who is Gaming at 1440p or 4K on Windows XP and Nvidia Maxwell generation graphics card. I am planning to build SLI setup with two GeForce GTX 980Ti graphics cards and LGA1366 system. Not sure how Windows XP would handle SLI.
I have a K4200 in my ITX XP build using a 2 slot pci-e DTX motherboard. Needed a single slot video card and the k4200 seem to be the fastest one with a VGA port.
phil do you have ryzen pc?, about two year ago i saw some people modify xp and install on ryzen 3xxx-5xxx systems, i tried that time on r5 1600 but couldnt succeeded
i can confirm the modded drivers work , i tested on a b75 motherboard with a gtx 970 and xp ran fine with the card, from what i can tell with xp a rule of thumb seems to go with a gpu with half the memory of the operating system since xp can't see more than 3.5 i found 2 to be the most it ever needs
I was trying to post this comment in reply to your comment under my other post, but it keeps disappearing after I post it. Perhaps UA-cam flagged it because it's long or something. I'll try to post it separately: Nvidia Inspector (now Nvidia Profile Inspector, previously the app did more stuff than tweak game profiles) is just a UI to expose everything that Nvidia themselves put in the driver. It goes through Nvidia's official NVAPI which Nvidia created so third party apps can access this stuff. People don't realize how much work the Nvidia driver team, for decades now, puts into compatibility options for older games that the game creators themselves long abandoned. It's why games (especially DX11 games but old stuff too) run so much better on Nvidia hardware and one of the reasons the Nvidia driver package is so huge. Nvidia has optimizations for thousands of games and you can view it all through Inspector. There are custom made 3D vision profiles (as in 3D glasses / 3DTV) for games from the 90s, with Nvidia developer notes. Through Inspector, you can mess around with everything, for example, there are numerous "compatibility bits" Nvidia has to help older games run, or fix something that was broken, and Inspector allows you to apply compatibility profiles Nvidia made for one game to another game, which can sometimes cause that second game to be fixed, or run better. I think what you are talking about is the "discovery" of sparse grid supersampling, or SGSSAA. Back in the DX9 and earlier days, when all games were forward rendered (and thus the driver can easily force AA), Nvidia implemented a lot of AA technologies through the driver. CSAA, MFAA, QAA, ordered grid SSAA, gamma correct MSAA, etc. At some point when games started using a lot of foliage, and before FXAA and post process AA was invented, there was a period where just forcing MSAA wasn't good enough because it didn't cover transparencies like foliage and chain link fences, and SSAA was too demanding, so Nvidia came up with transparency multisampling (TrMSAA) and transparency supersampling (TrSSAA) that only applied to transparencies, which was meant to be used in conjunction with MSAA. This TrSSAA implementation used a new sparse grid technique instead of ordered grid. So with 4xMSAA plus 4x TrSSAA you could get very good anti-aliasing coverage of then-modern DX9 games on par with SSAA but at a much lower performance cost. People using Inspector discovered if you combined TrSSAA with SSAA instead of MSAA, the driver would actually apply the sparse grid supersampling technique to the entire scene including polygon edges (meaning the ordered grid SSAA was being overridden into a new "SGSSAA"). This was actually a glitch and causes some blur under certain conditions, which can be offset by changing some other game profile options through Inspector. The end result is a new SSAA option that a lot of people liked because of its quality to performance ratio (it is less intensive than traditional SSAA). When Nvidia learned that enthusiasts liked this option, they decided not to fix the glitch and SGSSAA remains a secret unofficial driver feature to this day which some people consider a sort of holy grail option, though I don't bother with it anymore as modern GPUs are now powerful enough to easily run traditional SSAA on older games without issues. Starting with the DX11 generation and deferred rendered games, traditional AA during the internal render stage became inefficient and hard to implement, so everyone abanded traditional MSAA and SSAA research in favor of downsampling the final image from higher resolutions, outside of the "knowledge" of the game. So all of those wacky AA options are now relics accessible through Inspector. Because Nvidia is dedicated to backwards compatibility and never removes anything from its drivers, we still get to use all of it today. (though modern GPUs can no longer use the CSAA modes, but they are still there for older GPUs to use)
Phil… did you detect any system instability while playing games because of the card having more than 4gb vram? I’m asking because I have a chance to purchase a gtx 980ti 6gb. 😊
My XP/Vista/7/8/8.1 box is running a 4770K that auto-overclocks to 4.7Ghz and a 770GTX 4GB on a Z series motherboard and with 32GB of 2400mhz memory because that's what I had in the machine when I changed it out for a new machine. It runs all late XP and later titles that my main rig has issues with, extremely well.
Is this mb supports chipset raid-0 for 2 or even 4 ssd's? (just to for the sake of "omg-super-overkill" XP system?) You do have at least one more ssd? (and 4x120gb cost so low at this point, where I'am even cheaper than on ali) I heard that hasswell boards don't have raid drivers for XP (never checked) but iX-3XXX do...
Hi, just discovered this video. I have quite a bit of experience playing older games with modern upgrades, both on current Windows and older versions. I have an i7/980 Ti WinXP build myself with these modded drivers. About 4K60 output through DisplayPort, that is unfortunately not possible in WinXP with any Nvidia GPU even though the Maxwell hardware and Windows XP OS both support it. The reason is due to the implementation of the DisplayPort specs in the Nvidia driver. DisplayPort supports different transmission modes with different bandwidth limits. The standard HBR mode of DisplayPort 1.0 only supports 8.64 Gbps which is enough for 1080p120Hz or 1440p90Hz or 4K30Hz. The later HBR2 mode of DisplayPort 1.2 supports 17.28 Gbps which allows for 4K60Hz, however Nvidia never bothered to add support for the HBR2 transmission mode in their Windows XP drivers. AMD did add HBR2 support for Windows XP (though this was in their days of rather bad drivers so the experience is annoying). The best AMD cards that support HBR2 and thus 4K60Hz on WinXP are the Tahiti GPUs, meaning the 7970, 7970 GHz Edition, and R9 280X (the R9 290X is NOT supported). Compared to the Maxwell line, these cards are somewhere between the 960 and 970 in performance, but at the 250W power draw of the Titan level cards, and performance varies wildly due to AMD driver performance in actual games, though they are still quite overpowered for any game old enough that you'd want to run it on XP rather than Win10/Win11 (which most late-era XP games run fine on, and most earlier games too honestly if you know how to fix them). The aforementioned annoying part of the experience is that you have to manually find and enable 4K at 60Hz in the AMD driver panel (it will probably default to something lower) with every boot because it won't remember the setting. There might be a way to fiddle around with custom resolutions or third party tools to make it stick but I'm not sure. As for the Nvidia supersampling modes, those have always been available on Geforce cards, just hidden. You can use Nvidia Profile Inspector to access them, though once upon a time Nvidia exposed more AA options through the normal Control Panel. I've been using them for well over a decade to run older games at pristine image quality. Those modes exposed on the Quadro aren't even all of them, just the mixed SSAA/MSAA modes. Nvidia offers pure SSAA modes 2x2, 3x3, and 4x4 as well. Those are ordered grid SSAA, if you really know what you are doing you can even enable an obscure sparse grid supersampling mode though I don't recommend it for most people due to its many quirks. I play all my old games at 4K120HZ with 4x4 SSAA on a 3090 Ti and they look immaculate and you'd be surprised how demanding 20 year old games can be with those settings, there are a few I need to knock down to 3x3 SSAA actually. When forcing these high end driver AA options on Win10 or Win11, you need to make sure you go to the compatibility tab for the DX9 or older game and disable Fullscreen Optimizations. The Fullscreen Optimizations setting, which is enabled by default now and forces exclusive fullscreen games to run in a special hybrid borderless fullscreen mode, will arbitrarily lock many older games to 60Hz for no reason and block driver AA from working in some games as well (though not all). Another tip is that for some games you need to use "enhance" rather than "override" AA for it to work, override usually works but if it doesn't, always try enhance before giving up, and try different modes, sometimes SSAA works better than MSAA or vice versa. Hope this is helpful to some people!
Fantastic comment! I've been reading up ancient forum information on that NVIDIA Inspector and how it accidentally did FSAA in the early stages. It's a real rabbit hole and takes me more time to digest it all.
Hear me out, I'm trying to get a GT 710 to work with my RTX 3080 and *avoid* using the old 400 series nvidia driver, but rather bring the GT 710 somehow in the Latest 3080 Driver. It's been hours, I'm still trying.. Is this possible ?
From all I've read enabling >4 GB on XP 32-bit is just not worth it on a home system. Now for more recent versions it's much more managable. I have a 6 GB 32-bit Win 7 setup, because there it's just changing 2 values with a hex editor. Microsoft decided that home consumer Windows doesn't need what Windows server gets, but it is easy to turn back on.
I have managed to put together a Windows XP system with the following components: Motherboard: GA-X79-UP4 CPU: I7 4930k RAM: 64GB (8x8) 1600mhz HDD: WD Velociraptor 320GB PSU: Coolermaster 750W (some old model, not really relevant since it's not used a lot) GPU: GTX Titan (the first one from 2013) I actually used Win XP 32bit so not all the RAM was usable. I used the Snappy Driver Installer for the drivers, it all went smooth. There weren't any problems in the end, except one strange thing, maybe some of you know why it happens. I was monitoring the total system power draw and in idle it was at around 160W which is extremely high. When I ran Windows 10 on this system, it was pulling around 70W in idle. Is it because Windows XP does not know how to properly keep this specific CPU in idle?
Hmm in Windows XP try changing the power profile and see if it makes a difference. It could very well be that lack of drivers cause the machine to. It go into the lowest power state.
i found the radeon hd 6970 is the ultimate all around windows xp card , it will play every game you can run on xp fine while supporting those old windows 98 games like incoming, colin mcrae rally , forsaken etc with no artifacts and rendering them as good as a riva tnt2 the terascale 2 cards have very good legacy support for older games on windows xp
I mean it is pretty impressive how much Nvidia stagnated with RTX4000. Beyond fast, atleast upto 0% faster than last gen for only twice the price with some cards
Officially the Rx 200 cards up to the R7 270X and the HD 7970/8970 are included. The chip-wise identical R9 280X and R9 370X should also be easily tricked.
Interesting but sadly my 32bit XP PC is using a Medion Digitainer case (because I loved the look of it) that is quite limited in airflow and it's PSU has no PCIe power connectors, that's why I opted for a 750 Ti that only uses PCIe slot power. Still plenty fast though. Do other Nvidia cards also have the problem that HDMI audio cuts out when the GPU load is too low? Have this problem with games like ST:V Elite Force 1. Here the intro and in the menus, also the game becomes unstable when going higher than 1024x768.
@@philscomputerlab I normally use it on my CRT monitor plus normal speakers but once hooked it up to our 4K TV, playing Elite Force on the couch just because I could. :D This was when I run into these problems. You mentioning Haswell just reminded me, that I still have my old i5 4690k PC standing around unused. I should try if I can get WinXP including drivers running on this system. It would be awesome to get my soon to be replaced 1070 running under XP.
Does it make any difference using Windows XP 64 bit edition when you have GPU's with a few gigabytes of ram vs 32-bit Windows XP? I've only ran Windows XP 64-bit in Hyper-V and it ran a lot faster than XP-32 bit. I kind of wish I would have had more RAM and 64 bit xp back in the day when it was still supported!
As someone who is running a GTX 970 in a Windows XP/Vista/7 multiboot gaming PC, the one major issue I had with using a newer Nvidia card is that in a small handful of 3D games under XP, there are vertex explosion graphical glitches. These are the games I tested that had those issues: Extreme Bullrider Lego Island 2: The Brickster's Revenge Looney Tunes: Sheep Raider Missile Command (1999) Roller Coaster Factory Sega Rally Championship Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six I also had the same graphical glitches with a GTX 650 Ti in another PC, so this is very likely a driver issue.
I have another one for your list: Battlefield 2 On any nvidia driver v334.89 and later and Radeon driver v11.4 and later you'll get black spots if you put terrain quality on anything but low.
With ver. 370 and later, nVidia ceased XP support. 368.81 is the latest version with XP support but with a twist... some models supported in previous versions have been removed. Initial driver ver. 344.11 had support for GTX 980 but since then the "official" version on nVidia download page does not have it. Luckily, good old boys over at Guru3D still host the initial version. Oh, and... I am sure I have a driver that supports GTX 690 under XP... somewhere. As far as nVidia is concerned, it is not supported... although it is pretty much two GTX 680 slapped together. There is that 09/29/2021 technical note which states: "The following SLI features are not supported on Windows XP: - Geforce GTX 680, 670 SLI - Quad SLI technology using GeForce GTX 590, GeForce 9800 GX2 or GeForce GTX 295 - 3-way SLI technology" hummm...
I'm having issues with my k620 and XP, Minecraft says "no opengl context found" and claims it's a driver issue. Do you think that could be it and have any clue how I can solve it?
Excellent. Keep upgrading my xp retro pc as i get new parts. I currently have an Intel Pentium G3260 with 4gb of ram, ssd, and a GTX 550 TI. I have a GTX 970 but I don't want to waste it for XP since I use it on a W10 HTPC that I use as an xbox to play an xbox 360 controller from the comfort of my couch. I also have an i5 4400 cpu and an i7 4790 which I think are too much for xp. It never worked for me to have more than 2 cores in XP, I had to disable several from the affinity options or from the bios. I think it's a waste. On the other hand, I don't know if it's worth building a Windows 7 retro PC just yet. I think most of the games work on Windows 10 which is what I have on my main gaming pc. Maybe the day I upgrade my current rig, I'll dedicate the GTX 970 to XP. If I could use the GTX 550 ti on Windows 98 that would be great.
Hi Phil, since 2015 I work with a HP Z820 with a Nvidia Quadro K6000 (12GB) and I also had issues with 4K (4096x2160). After many trials and errors I found the strange solution: turn off ECC in the Nvidia Control Panel. From that time until now, the machine has run smoothly and still operates the big software (Adobe etc.). Don't know whether this could be the same problem, and whether the M6000 suffers the same problem, but I've never turned the ECC on again and it's still still running great. Maybe, when my machine will retire, i will make it a bad ass retro machine. Thanks for the video.
The AI itself isn't super impressive, but the way it's implemented in the game is just marvelous. It's not simply "throw enemy AI package number 5 in there", but everything is crafted to work together.
On the nvidia website there is a firmware update for displayport from GTX 700 to GTX 1000 with some fixes. Maybe it can fix the low refresh rate in 4k.
May be someone already mentioned it but yes you can enable the same AA options on any nvidia GPU with "NVIDIA Inspector" (But not the latest version, you need version which has built in profile inspector, newer version has it as a separate application, I don't remember the exact version unfortunately)
This is just a fact of life for those using laptops with an mxm slot and wanting to upgrade when possible, ngreedia did eventually drop the lockout for some cards but the rest you have to do this. The worst of the lot to get working will be the Tesla models for both the desktop and for laptops due to all the lockouts. Kinda funny that some of the mxm cards out there started their life as car parts being used for the infotainment and self driving feature in some Tesla cars lol.
The Quadro M6000 is pretty expensive on ebay while the Tesla M40 is pretty cheap. I wonder if there's a way to use the M40 for graphics processing with another gpu outputting the graphics.
Would have to wait until someone figured a way to backport that feature to XP. The first known case of this working was Nvidia Optimus in windows Vista.
You could probably drive 2K(but not 4K) 60Hz out in analogue using the DVI socket with a VGA adapter in Windows XP, but that would bring up the issue of where the heck you'd find a capable monitor with VGA in.
I still keep GTX460 and GTX275 for ultimate XP gaming PC, I know, there were better cards with official XP support, but these 2 are more than enough for anything I need to play on it. FaCry with some P4 and 7600GT is still pretty slow, but on GTX275 with C2Q, that's total overkill. 😀
Nice tip about getting more antialiasing options with quadro cards, compared to geforce. What i don't like is widespread trend of reflashing bioses of quadro cards to make them basicaly geforce with different outputs. Have no idea what is benefit of that as drivers are almost same, but quadro's have more optimisations of Opengl enabled and looks like also more driver options. Still need to see video of what are benefits of flashing quadros....to me its plain stupid.
Sadly modern nvidia cards don't support CSAA anymore. In games where it worked, it was amazing, and in those games where it didn't work, it was as good as the MSAA level it's based on.
Hello. Please help me. Is it possible to modify gtx 970m from a laptop? I found the laptop with i7 4710hq and I hope i can install win xp on it. Since it was originally pre installed with win 7
It would be a good use for my PCI heavy Z87 board, i5 4400 and GTX 650ti and another SoundBlaster Live!. I'd only need to buy a case and PSU to assemble the PC.
A major thing for me is that Maxwell was the last generation of Nvidia GPUs to have a DVI-I/A with a proper RAMDAC for CRT monitors. I use a 980Ti on a WinXP32 gaming machine to play games from the 1998-2006 era with modded drivers. I have a DVI-I to VGA adapter on it and the image is absolutely crisp on 2D games. Maxwell will probably go down in history to have the best analog VGA quality ever. The RAMDAC on it can drive a large CRT to really high refresh without artifacts -- an issue I experience with "period correct" hardware. On the display port, I use a 1920x1200 LCD to properly scale 4:3-only games to 1600x1200.
Excellent point and wasn't aware, thanks for pointing this out.
@@philscomputerlab I would love a video on comparing analog VGA output quality on old video cards. I remember that RAMDAC MHz was a big marketing thing back then.
Yeah, for Nvidia. XP support cuts off with dx9 though, unless dxvk, and AMD had the better native dx9 hardware. I wonder if AMD's 290/390 cards work. Anything above a 960 is pretty much overkill for XP era games anyway. Not to mention there's actually no reason to run XP or XP hardware when the games are fully compatible with modern Windows and hardware. Only 9x is really worth having a dedicated box, because of specific hardware and software locked to 9x. You can emulate 3dfx glide, not powervr, not virge, not aureal3d. Descent 3 also has specific effects locked to a pentium 3. As a final note GOG does NOT support installing on XP/9x, and if you look at their history, the installers were encrypted to block Linux for a good while. So GOG was deliberately blocking you from using their versions on retro PCs and Linux. Outside of workarounds. They're not what they pretend to be.
@@JohnDoe-ip3oq What would they have to gain from blocking linux I honestly wonder. Like it would be one thing if their games and/or the way they make them work on modern windows just happens to run into issues with linux, but intentional encryption is another issue altogether.
I agree.
I want to say thank for this educational content, you’ve helped more people than you could possibly know
😊
Hey, Phill. Just some new information for XP users. Nvidia Drivers 344.11 (which are XP only), they support both GTX 970 and 980 by default. No need to mod them. Althou, Nvidia page doesn't show them in official list, driver files contain all information needed to instal it in legacy way :) Cheers!
Hey, I have a Quadro K620 and I can't get it to work right. I installed an older driver than this but I'm having major issues.
For example Minecraft is telling me "No OpenGL context found" and that I have bad drivers.
Do you know if this supports the k620 and if this would solve my issue?
Heh, I appreciate the shout-out. Wasn't expecting that and glad to help.
I've not tried patching drivers for Windows XP yet because my WinXP retro gaming PC is running a GTX 460 and seems to work but I have a GTX 650 Ti in a different machine that could benefit from this patching technique. Thank you!
650ti runs native. You can find drivers on nvidia page. Even for 750ti, 950. All run native on WXP.
Awesome video as always. Quadro M6000 has so much untapped potential for gaming, I'm glad this channel continues pushing its retro technology to its limits.
4K on XP? What madness is that? That's so anachronistic I'm in awe it can be done at all, even if with a low refresh rate.
Yeah. Disable hyper-threading and turn off two of the cores, you'll get a 4.4GHz beast with the 4790K. Especially when you couple a very fast SSD with it. And later, if you can get your hands on it, compare the performance difference between the Quadro M6000 and the GTX Titan X.
Totally agree on hyperthreading, no XP game should benefit from it and some might even get slower. But I don't see why disabling cores, turning it into the equivalent of a Pentium G with more cache would be useful. I'd just keep all cores on, turning it into an i5, should give the performance and width to run basically everything.
I used the exact same procedure to get my FX 5900 ZT up and running on Windows 98 with the 45.23 driver recently. That version was released a full 13 years before 368.81, so I guess Nvidia never considered it worth blocking people from doing this.
They haven't bothered to change the control panel UI in 23+ years either. Kind of sad when you consider the RTX 4090 has the same control panel interface that the Riva TNT2 did. More so because it wasn't even good back then either.
@@bdhale34 Even on a relatively modern machine (roughly the same age as the hardware used in this video) the control panel is still laggy and unresponsive at times, too. Like, are you kidding me?
Phil's makin my XP rig great again!
XP was always great...
After SP2
@@JohnSmith-xq1pz but not his XP rig 😂
You are everywhere
@@RetroTinkerer lol true
Love all the 9x & xp content! I might have to get one if those first my High-end xp rig. It's got a i7 4790, 4gb ram, gtx 960 2gb and S/blaster xf-i SB0820
My lower end rig for older stuff is a pentium 4 650, 1gb ram, 8800gts 640mb and S/blaster SB0410
The P4 650 is a great CPU for 98/XP.
The best retro channel in UA-cam
Got this exact one. Love it, I was using it 2015-2023.
Ha! I knew there was a reason for me keeping my old 980Ti.. Time for a new project! :D
Great video, looking forwards to trying this out!
Go for it!
@@philscomputerlab ciao, è possibile farlo con 1050Ti o Quado M5000? Grazie
Happy Friday Phil! Thank you sir for the coverage of the high end XP cards 👍
Same to you!
Another Great Video. Thank you for this, It's given me some ideas for a future XP build. I'm currently rocking 2 x GTX 295 in my XP beast. Not that it even needs that. Honetly I mostly play games from 1997 to 2010 at the latest. Modern stuff is almosted wasted on me.
😮 Amazing setup but a bit inefficient and can easily be replaced with a single faster card. But still amazing to have quad SLI.
@PhilsComputerLab yes, it's more of a "I wish I had this in 2009" build. It's not really meant to be efficient, just fun to play with.
Wew 2x gtx 295 is quite power hungry.
When using a single gpu die on the gtx 295 a gtx 750 ti is about 45% faster it seems.
Personally I'd probably go with a gtx 950 rather then the 960 if I'm going with an overkill build.
Though my dell inspiron 6000 laptop does play the games id want too run every once in a while just fine. Pentium m @ 1.5 ghz 1.5 gb ram & ati x300 graphics, for colin mcrae 1 for example.
(900 series for a bit better display & dsr support & lower powerdraw then something like a gtx 460 or 770)
Specially for earlier era games it's basically almost all cpu anyway unless you are running nglide,dgvoodoo emulation at like 4k resolution or 1440p in some games.
they dual PCB or single PCB GTX 295's?
Another tip I forgot to mention in my previous comment, I highly recommend all retro WinXP builds also have a Win7/10/11 drive or partition as well in a dual boot setup with the networking disabled in WinXP which is insecure now and shouldn't be connected to the internet. Having a modern Windows drive or partition to boot into provides some very important functions:
1) The ability to safely use the internet and download software, game installers, and other files straight into the WinXP drive or partition
2) The ability to run SSD TRIM commands on the WinXP drive or partition
3) The ability to perform any necessary maintenance tasks on the WinXP drive or partition such as drive imaging, cloning, virus scanning, etc.
It's good to find a dual purpose for the WinXP machine. With an i7, 16GB RAM, a 980 Ti, and modern Windows support, it is a waste not to do anything with it. I have my "retro" (it's actually in a modern case) build running on Win10 as a dedicated file server and HTPC as its regular job, and boot into the WinXP and Win7 drives if necessary to run old programs and games. The 980 Ti is modern enough to have fan-stop and idle downclocking so it doesn't even make noise or use any more power than a low end GPU most of the time, but I wouldn't use a much older GPU for such a purpose as they used to be loud powerhogs at idle. In fact a 980 Ti can play most older games without even turning the fans on (or barely) and barely clocking up, making it straight up objectively better than a cheaper period-correct blow dryer power sucking GPU even if you think you don't need something that powerful for old games.
Retro machines are usually offline, no Internet connection. Trim is interesting. I spoke to SSD manufacturers and they assured me the modern drives do all this on their own.
@@philscomputerlab Yes, my point is by dual booting a modern OS, you can get them online and not have to go through the hassle of ferrying over files via USB drives or whatever people are doing. SSDs do internal garbage collection, but there are still benefits from OS TRIM commands. Though since SSDs don't run full speed under XP anyway, I doubt it will every be a major issue unless the SSD is an older model. Check out the following article: Ask Ars: “My SSD does garbage collection, so I don’t need TRIM… right?”
@@firstlast55555 Good points! A simple Live Linux would do the trick also. Yea that's what team group and crucial told me, but who knows. Maybe things have progressed? I've heard if Tiny10 or a similar name, a small footprint windows 10.
stop spreading this bullshit, you don't just magically instantly gain thousands of rootkits, viruses, and malware because you connected an outdated operating system to the internet unless you make the absolutely INSANE decision to connect it DIRECTLY to the internet without any kind of firewall between it and the internet, which you shouldn't do with ANY operating system, even a modern up to date one, if you have even an older router with a firewall though (which you should, no device should ever be connected directly to the WAN like that other then the router/firewall) it's absolutely fine though, just use an adblocker and avoid sketchy websites, just like you would on a modern os
I enjoy playing the old games now more than I did when they were new.
Thank you SIr. I am running a QUADRO K2200 in Windows XP 64 bit and 32 bit. Results were very impressive.
I remember doing something similar to this to get Quadro drivers running on Geforce cards. The Quadro cards were always so much more expensive than the equivalently Geforce card, and apparently the only difference is the drivers.
You can use wineD3D for windows or onecore api to make WXP run modern games provided that it uses upto vc redist 2012-2015. You could probably keep an entire pc offline with XP installed just for the sole purpose of running gog games. I got the latest build of chromium running on windows xp under onecore api which is a patch not too dissimilar to kernelEX for w95-2k.
This Quadro looks really good.
nice, you gotta love those quaddros and a little file editing. my newest xp build is a q9450/780i with two gtx 960, just have to get the sli enabled. after ill try a couple 980 ti.
Never had luck getting SLI with over 4gb of vram in XP. It was always wonky. I even have a pair of Quadro FX 5800, which support XP natively.
q9450 will be bottled by 2 980tis
Thanks! I got a 1680v2, Rampage IV Extreme, 8x4gb 2000mhz ram, Creative Xfi Titanium Fatal1ty, and Titan X build I’m trying to get set up on Windows Xp as an ultimate XP/ 7 dual boot build. At some point I’m gonna get another Titan X for SLI
😮Amazing 😍
@@philscomputerlab I was on Vogons researching “the theoretical ultimate Xp build” years ago and ever since I slowly have been finding deals and putting it together. I got it all put together finally, once I get some free time I just gotta get the OS and drivers installed to finally test it out.
If I were going to attempt building an XP rig, I'd go with a Z390 Dark with an i9-9900K, 2-way Titan X (Maxwell) SLI setup, and Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium HD or ASUS Xonar Essence ST(X) sound card.
You are spot on with the 4th gen Intel. After your earlier video on using this 3770 I put together a WinXP supercomputer using some leftover parts. Core i5 4690k. That is 4 cores (no hyperthread) with a mild overclock of 4.0GHz all core and DDR3 1600. Thew in a Dell OEM SB xFi titanium (SB880) and an AMD Radeon 6950 1GB card. I'm contemplating getting a 2nd matching 6950 for crossfire but I'm not sure yet if I want to deal with lag and stutter because the current setup is so silky smooth. Best part about the 6950 is that it uses has port which can output 1080p at 165Hz! (A 6950 is about the same performance as a 750ti)
Awesome 😎
This is FANTASTIC, and exactly why I subbed to you ages ago. Keep up the great work, Phil! 😁👍👍
You're spot on about newer games, I'd say that most AAA-games since around 2016-18 are WAY over-produced? (I've played with PC's since 1980's, perspective helps sometimes;) So GOG saves a day in here too. Most games played in here are still from 1995-2015; Civ4/FalloutNV/etc and heavily modded. I'd say that sweet spot for XP-gaming GPU's is about nvidia gtx750ti/760, 770 runs too hot and gtx900-series is still often expensive for just casual retrogaming. AMD equivalent would be HD7000-series, especially 7750/7770/7850/7870-ones are quite nice.
Speaking of CPU's, I'd select unlocked Intel 3000 or 4000 K-series and disable possible hyperthreading to lower temperatures. 3570k/3770k/4570k/etc. Some XP-era games can actually utilize 4 cores, but HT is useless with XP unless you have just 2-core/4-thread CPU.
Btw, have you tested VGA-card overclocking with DOS-games like we did in 90's? If I remember correctly it helped quite a bit with Cirrus 542x/543x and S3-cards at the time.
Wish it was possible to patch SLI support for some of the later cards supported in the windows XP drivers. My 690 and 780ti's could use the love.
Don't both have the SLI connector? Should be possible to use them in SLI. Now the benefit of running dual GK110 or quad GK104 under XP is a different question.
Phil you are Amazing as usual!! I have some older motherboard combos that I play around with and i found that even win10 will work on many of them too. There is a certain rambus board I want to get someday but they are very scarce and downright expensive too! It would be nice to see what could run on these old boards besides win 95/98 but I never got that far because the board died on me. It was an ASUS P4T 533-R and I still have 2 sticks of Rambus 4800 32 bit which this stuff was very fast memory indeed.
I have an Intel D850GBAL socket 423 motherboard that i picked up a few years back as new old stock. I have it paired with 2GB PC800 RDRAM and a 1.9ghz P4. I used a PCI Sata card to enable use of an SSD and have tried a few different O/S. Windows 200 is my preferred and it runs flawlessly. XP is fine and runs reasonably well. Windows 7 was painful and i havent tried windows 10 yet. With windows 7 the CPU was pegged to 100% usage. I may give it another shot at some point once i finish a few other projects off (i have 3 socket 478, a 939, an AM2, 2 1366 and a 2011 all in various stages of completion).
Vanilla Windows XP (so the first release) does not support SATA if I remember correctly. You need a floppy with SATA drivers or maybe a USB stick (not sure).
Also, Ivy Bridge HEDT is also supported on Windows XP.
Yea you can do many things. Enable IDE mode in BIOS. Slipstream AHCI drivers. Load F5 Floppy drivers...
You had to slipstream ahci in Vista too.
Phil thanks for the useful information. As always very useful in practice. Maybe some day i will finally build ultimate XP/Vista DX9/DX10 PC powerful enough to run late DX9 and early DX10 titles
Very similar to my Retro XP PC. Mine is an i5-3570K, 8GB RAM DDR3 1600MHz (cause I dual boot WinXP/Win10), GTX 750 Ti, Creative X-Fi and the same Crucial SSD!
The only thing that makes that a "retro" set up is the fact that Microsoft build their modern and crappy OSes to deliberately lock out and "overbloat" set ups like that - I am using similar set ups to that, even Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad machines as perfectly good daily driver machines under Linux.
Because I gave up on AAA gaming about a decade ago when "games as a service" kicked off, I don't need newer hardware than what you have there anyway - plus this age of hardware is extremely cheap on eBay at the moment due to the "mindless muppets" upgrading their PCs ready for Windows 11.
But no complaints from me, I'll happily buy up there "hardware cast-offs".
I'm running a Core 2 as almost daily driver as well. It's my media system to have alongside the stronger gaming one. And with the hardware upgrade coming soon, the old system probably turns into pretty much the same op has there.
patch your bios for nvme boot!
The Nvidia Quadro m6000 is super expensive. I don’t know if the price went up after your video but they appear to be very sought after, at the same time there are lots of them available. Gtx 980 ti is also quite pricey, and the 960 is almost affordable. I found an ASUS gtx 950m for my Shuttle xpc at £21 but it needed a new fan (£8)This was a good find as they are generally quite a lot more. It’s useful for ipx cases with a low power draw and good performance. I’m glad to hear that it’s compatible with Windows xp. Thx.
Used to do that when upgrading my beloved ASRock 4Core Dual-VSTA from my 6800 Ultra to accept a 7600GT AGP, then a 8800 PCIe under XP.
Also rolled my own 1080p EDID settings to force FullHD on a 15" 1024x768 CRT. - _Mr. Squint_
I had that board...it allowed me to upgrade to 775 and still use my x1950 GT AGP, which I loved. I used that board with many different CPU and GPU. I also ended up on an 8800GT PCIe lol
@@AaronHendu I liked it so much I recently bought one (1str one fried) and upgraded it to a Q6600, very nice in spite of the slight FSB reduction. I also have the SATA version. _Certifiably nutz._
Love seeing the older tech vids. I would like to update my XP build a bit more, but I am rocking a i72600k with 4gb ddr3 1600mhz, gtx 960, Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS Platinum, and a asus board forget the number off hand. Works well at 1280x1024 @ 60fps... no problems really at all, but a bit better cpu would be kinda cool!
Keep up the great work Phil!
No need to upgrade. Only improvement would be getting 500 instead of 400 FPS or something like that...
The 2600K is already close to the limit of what has drivers for XP. You could get a 2700K or 3770K, as that is already the last platform with official XP drivers. And those are maybe 3-5% faster at best.
But the oc headroom on these chips is still immense. I'm running my 3570K on 4.3 GHz and my DDR3-1600 on 2133. Seen a bunch of 2500K/2600K/2700K hit 5 GHz back then. You could easily get 20-30% more out of that i5 in those pesky low-threaded, CPU demanding games.
Oh geese, SSAA and the whole resolution beyond what is displayed was a whole rabbit hole for me many years ago now. Different combinations of SS and MS AA, NVidia super-resolution, just custom resolutions that the GPU scaled, and different injector ulitilies. I remember there were multiple spreadsheets and forum posts with tables that gave guidelines which combination of AA and SSAO (a shadowing thing) was best or problematic for which game. By far the best method was some injection utility that I don't remember the name of unfortunately (some kind of scaler maybe...). It could separate the UI layer from the rendering, and that way the UI could remain crisp being drawn to the native resolution without any forced AA, and the 3D rendered part could be superscaled. The drawback was, that you had to write specific configs for each game (depending on the game, this was not so difficult as you might presume), and the supported DirectX version was either capped at, or only 9.
But more relevant to you: I have been forcing SSAA on games back in the day with my Geforce 750 Ti, so it should be available with other Geforce cards too. If you don't find it in the NVidia control panel, try the nvidiaInspector utility. It is an alternative UI for driver settings with more options.
Best computer channel on youtube?
Interesting, like!
Tweaking the drivers looks similar to when I had to modify Nvidia drivers for my Alienware M17X R3 to upgrade from a GTX 580M to a GTX 880M GPU in Windows 7. Never thought you could do it for WinXP but it makes sense.
I remember doing the same thing to add support for my laptop's GeForce Go 6100 to the latest driver.
The last few month i am playing the Gothic series on a 775 system with ddr1 and agp slot using windows xp. 1680x1050 is doable with a Radeon 2600 xt. really enjoying that.
Oh, I have a (dead) board with that port combination with some freakish SiS chipset. Would make for some interesting benchmark scaling setup, but sadly dead.
Hard to believe the Titan XP is practically a 2080 (in rasterization performance).
True but the Titan XP is a higher performance tier card and only one generation older than the 2080 and they both do not support Windows XP. You will need a Titan X Maxwell to get the best performance in Windows XP.
But we are talking about the equivalent of a Titan X(M) here
Nice video thank you Phil
I miss your content on my feed
The peak performance for GPUs are oficially the GTX 960 and GTX 780 Ti. The 780 Ti is faster, but the 960 is more efficient and offers newer features. On the Radeon side the newest ones are Rx 200 cards, so R9 290X.
But as shown, more powerful cards of (nearly) the same architecture would also work.
R9 280/280X are the last XP supported models, R9 290/290X are not. There are some drivers floating around the net claiming XP support for R9 290/290X but that simply is not true.
There are no "AMD67B0" and "AMD67B1" entries in "Localizable Strings" section of the corresponding INF; no entries, no support.
PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_67B0 = R9 290X (Hawaii XT, GCN 2.0)
PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_67B1 = R9 290 (Hawaii PRO, GCN 2.0)
AMD6810 and AMD6811 entries descibed as "AMD Radeon R9 200 Series" can be found, though.
PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_6810 = R9 370X (Trinidad XT, GCN 1.0)
PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_6811 = R9 370, R9370 OEM (Trinidad PRO, GCN 1.0)
R9 370 is is about 5-10% less capable than, while R9 370X is on par with R9 270X.
Just had to say that :D
@@sirfoggy7682 oh right, the only new cards of the series aren't supported. But everything that is a HD 7000 rebrand will work.
@@HappyBeezerStudios HD 8990 is OEM rebrand of HD 7990 and neither are XP-supported.
Windows XP does not get along with modern display outputs (Display port or HDMI) I've found out at high resolution video gets errors and I couldn't get any refresh rate higher than 60hz. Using a Titan X with modified drivers. Display shows up as a TV. I was able to achieve was 1080p at 60hz on my Alienware OLED 175hz monitor via DP or HDMI.
Finally, I found one on UA-cam who is Gaming at 1440p or 4K on Windows XP and Nvidia Maxwell generation graphics card.
I am planning to build SLI setup with two GeForce GTX 980Ti graphics cards and LGA1366 system. Not sure how Windows XP would handle SLI.
XP works great with SLI, haven't tried with a GTX 900 series however.
I have a K4200 in my ITX XP build using a 2 slot pci-e DTX motherboard. Needed a single slot video card and the k4200 seem to be the fastest one with a VGA port.
x79 asus rampage iv extreme black edition with i7-4960k/ Xeon E5-1680 v2, titan x/Quadro M6000 is the fastest you can get for xp as far as i no.
phil do you have ryzen pc?, about two year ago i saw some people modify xp and install on ryzen 3xxx-5xxx systems, i tried that time on r5 1600 but couldnt succeeded
I'm thinking the displayport version on the card don't support 4k 60hz
It is DP 1.2 and the card supports 4k60 on all 4 DP simultaneously. So I think it has something to do with the driver modding
i can confirm the modded drivers work , i tested on a b75 motherboard with a gtx 970 and xp ran fine with the card, from what i can tell with xp a rule of thumb seems to go with a gpu with half the memory of the operating system since xp can't see more than 3.5 i found 2 to be the most it ever needs
Confirms to me that keeping my GTX 660 Ti was a good choice. Not the fastest XP card, but close enough.
Hey Phil, so how much did you end up paying for the 950 and the M6000 workstation?
It was a HP Z640 and was around 350 AUD. There will be a video.
Wish you could use the Titan Xp with XP seems fitting.
Little nitpick but in the description, you accidently called the 970, the 870. Good video regardless.
I was trying to post this comment in reply to your comment under my other post, but it keeps disappearing after I post it. Perhaps UA-cam flagged it because it's long or something. I'll try to post it separately:
Nvidia Inspector (now Nvidia Profile Inspector, previously the app did more stuff than tweak game profiles) is just a UI to expose everything that Nvidia themselves put in the driver. It goes through Nvidia's official NVAPI which Nvidia created so third party apps can access this stuff. People don't realize how much work the Nvidia driver team, for decades now, puts into compatibility options for older games that the game creators themselves long abandoned. It's why games (especially DX11 games but old stuff too) run so much better on Nvidia hardware and one of the reasons the Nvidia driver package is so huge. Nvidia has optimizations for thousands of games and you can view it all through Inspector. There are custom made 3D vision profiles (as in 3D glasses / 3DTV) for games from the 90s, with Nvidia developer notes. Through Inspector, you can mess around with everything, for example, there are numerous "compatibility bits" Nvidia has to help older games run, or fix something that was broken, and Inspector allows you to apply compatibility profiles Nvidia made for one game to another game, which can sometimes cause that second game to be fixed, or run better.
I think what you are talking about is the "discovery" of sparse grid supersampling, or SGSSAA. Back in the DX9 and earlier days, when all games were forward rendered (and thus the driver can easily force AA), Nvidia implemented a lot of AA technologies through the driver. CSAA, MFAA, QAA, ordered grid SSAA, gamma correct MSAA, etc. At some point when games started using a lot of foliage, and before FXAA and post process AA was invented, there was a period where just forcing MSAA wasn't good enough because it didn't cover transparencies like foliage and chain link fences, and SSAA was too demanding, so Nvidia came up with transparency multisampling (TrMSAA) and transparency supersampling (TrSSAA) that only applied to transparencies, which was meant to be used in conjunction with MSAA. This TrSSAA implementation used a new sparse grid technique instead of ordered grid. So with 4xMSAA plus 4x TrSSAA you could get very good anti-aliasing coverage of then-modern DX9 games on par with SSAA but at a much lower performance cost. People using Inspector discovered if you combined TrSSAA with SSAA instead of MSAA, the driver would actually apply the sparse grid supersampling technique to the entire scene including polygon edges (meaning the ordered grid SSAA was being overridden into a new "SGSSAA"). This was actually a glitch and causes some blur under certain conditions, which can be offset by changing some other game profile options through Inspector. The end result is a new SSAA option that a lot of people liked because of its quality to performance ratio (it is less intensive than traditional SSAA). When Nvidia learned that enthusiasts liked this option, they decided not to fix the glitch and SGSSAA remains a secret unofficial driver feature to this day which some people consider a sort of holy grail option, though I don't bother with it anymore as modern GPUs are now powerful enough to easily run traditional SSAA on older games without issues.
Starting with the DX11 generation and deferred rendered games, traditional AA during the internal render stage became inefficient and hard to implement, so everyone abanded traditional MSAA and SSAA research in favor of downsampling the final image from higher resolutions, outside of the "knowledge" of the game. So all of those wacky AA options are now relics accessible through Inspector. Because Nvidia is dedicated to backwards compatibility and never removes anything from its drivers, we still get to use all of it today. (though modern GPUs can no longer use the CSAA modes, but they are still there for older GPUs to use)
Thanks for such informative video, would be great to see video with comparison of the AA technologies 😊
Noted!
Phil… did you detect any system instability while playing games because of the card having more than 4gb vram? I’m asking because I have a chance to purchase a gtx 980ti 6gb. 😊
No issues with the games I tested, but doesn't mean you won't run into something with some select games...
My XP/Vista/7/8/8.1 box is running a 4770K that auto-overclocks to 4.7Ghz and a 770GTX 4GB on a Z series motherboard and with 32GB of 2400mhz memory because that's what I had in the machine when I changed it out for a new machine.
It runs all late XP and later titles that my main rig has issues with, extremely well.
Very nice.
Is this mb supports chipset raid-0 for 2 or even 4 ssd's? (just to for the sake of "omg-super-overkill" XP system?) You do have at least one more ssd? (and 4x120gb cost so low at this point, where I'am even cheaper than on ali)
I heard that hasswell boards don't have raid drivers for XP (never checked) but iX-3XXX do...
Not sure if this particular board supports it, but yes, many boards support RAID.
Hi, just discovered this video. I have quite a bit of experience playing older games with modern upgrades, both on current Windows and older versions. I have an i7/980 Ti WinXP build myself with these modded drivers. About 4K60 output through DisplayPort, that is unfortunately not possible in WinXP with any Nvidia GPU even though the Maxwell hardware and Windows XP OS both support it. The reason is due to the implementation of the DisplayPort specs in the Nvidia driver. DisplayPort supports different transmission modes with different bandwidth limits. The standard HBR mode of DisplayPort 1.0 only supports 8.64 Gbps which is enough for 1080p120Hz or 1440p90Hz or 4K30Hz. The later HBR2 mode of DisplayPort 1.2 supports 17.28 Gbps which allows for 4K60Hz, however Nvidia never bothered to add support for the HBR2 transmission mode in their Windows XP drivers.
AMD did add HBR2 support for Windows XP (though this was in their days of rather bad drivers so the experience is annoying). The best AMD cards that support HBR2 and thus 4K60Hz on WinXP are the Tahiti GPUs, meaning the 7970, 7970 GHz Edition, and R9 280X (the R9 290X is NOT supported). Compared to the Maxwell line, these cards are somewhere between the 960 and 970 in performance, but at the 250W power draw of the Titan level cards, and performance varies wildly due to AMD driver performance in actual games, though they are still quite overpowered for any game old enough that you'd want to run it on XP rather than Win10/Win11 (which most late-era XP games run fine on, and most earlier games too honestly if you know how to fix them). The aforementioned annoying part of the experience is that you have to manually find and enable 4K at 60Hz in the AMD driver panel (it will probably default to something lower) with every boot because it won't remember the setting. There might be a way to fiddle around with custom resolutions or third party tools to make it stick but I'm not sure.
As for the Nvidia supersampling modes, those have always been available on Geforce cards, just hidden. You can use Nvidia Profile Inspector to access them, though once upon a time Nvidia exposed more AA options through the normal Control Panel. I've been using them for well over a decade to run older games at pristine image quality. Those modes exposed on the Quadro aren't even all of them, just the mixed SSAA/MSAA modes. Nvidia offers pure SSAA modes 2x2, 3x3, and 4x4 as well. Those are ordered grid SSAA, if you really know what you are doing you can even enable an obscure sparse grid supersampling mode though I don't recommend it for most people due to its many quirks. I play all my old games at 4K120HZ with 4x4 SSAA on a 3090 Ti and they look immaculate and you'd be surprised how demanding 20 year old games can be with those settings, there are a few I need to knock down to 3x3 SSAA actually.
When forcing these high end driver AA options on Win10 or Win11, you need to make sure you go to the compatibility tab for the DX9 or older game and disable Fullscreen Optimizations. The Fullscreen Optimizations setting, which is enabled by default now and forces exclusive fullscreen games to run in a special hybrid borderless fullscreen mode, will arbitrarily lock many older games to 60Hz for no reason and block driver AA from working in some games as well (though not all). Another tip is that for some games you need to use "enhance" rather than "override" AA for it to work, override usually works but if it doesn't, always try enhance before giving up, and try different modes, sometimes SSAA works better than MSAA or vice versa.
Hope this is helpful to some people!
Fantastic comment! I've been reading up ancient forum information on that NVIDIA Inspector and how it accidentally did FSAA in the early stages. It's a real rabbit hole and takes me more time to digest it all.
Hear me out,
I'm trying to get a GT 710 to work with my RTX 3080 and *avoid* using the old 400 series nvidia driver, but rather bring the GT 710 somehow in the Latest 3080 Driver.
It's been hours, I'm still trying.. Is this possible ?
Great video sir!
I don't know if you've already done this but can you make a video about Windows XP with PAE so that you can use more than 4GB of system RAM?
From all I've read enabling >4 GB on XP 32-bit is just not worth it on a home system. Now for more recent versions it's much more managable. I have a 6 GB 32-bit Win 7 setup, because there it's just changing 2 values with a hex editor. Microsoft decided that home consumer Windows doesn't need what Windows server gets, but it is easy to turn back on.
I have managed to put together a Windows XP system with the following components:
Motherboard: GA-X79-UP4
CPU: I7 4930k
RAM: 64GB (8x8) 1600mhz
HDD: WD Velociraptor 320GB
PSU: Coolermaster 750W (some old model, not really relevant since it's not used a lot)
GPU: GTX Titan (the first one from 2013)
I actually used Win XP 32bit so not all the RAM was usable.
I used the Snappy Driver Installer for the drivers, it all went smooth.
There weren't any problems in the end, except one strange thing, maybe some of you know why it happens. I was monitoring the total system power draw and in idle it was at around 160W which is extremely high. When I ran Windows 10 on this system, it was pulling around 70W in idle. Is it because Windows XP does not know how to properly keep this specific CPU in idle?
Hmm in Windows XP try changing the power profile and see if it makes a difference. It could very well be that lack of drivers cause the machine to. It go into the lowest power state.
Is something similar possible for Radeon cards? Always wanted to get my R9 290 working in XP (it seems support tops out with the R7 2xx series).
i found the radeon hd 6970 is the ultimate all around windows xp card , it will play every game you can run on xp fine while supporting those old windows 98 games like incoming, colin mcrae rally , forsaken etc with no artifacts and rendering them as good as a riva tnt2 the terascale 2 cards have very good legacy support for older games on windows xp
You are right! Not many know if the Incoming glitches in cards newer then TNT2...
Agreed I have a 6950 and it works great for older stuff too!
Welp, time for a Haswell i7 Titan X build with only 4GB RAM
Nice card. Has as much VRAM as the new 4070s 😅
True that!
I mean it is pretty impressive how much Nvidia stagnated with RTX4000. Beyond fast, atleast upto 0% faster than last gen for only twice the price with some cards
I have a 970 laying around ive always wanted to build a windows XP machine for retro gaming.
Nice, i wonder how team red fairs with the most recent graphics card supported?
Officially the Rx 200 cards up to the R7 270X and the HD 7970/8970 are included. The chip-wise identical R9 280X and R9 370X should also be easily tricked.
Interesting but sadly my 32bit XP PC is using a Medion Digitainer case (because I loved the look of it) that is quite limited in airflow and it's PSU has no PCIe power connectors, that's why I opted for a 750 Ti that only uses PCIe slot power. Still plenty fast though.
Do other Nvidia cards also have the problem that HDMI audio cuts out when the GPU load is too low? Have this problem with games like ST:V Elite Force 1. Here the intro and in the menus, also the game becomes unstable when going higher than 1024x768.
750 is an amazing card for XP! I haven't used HDMI audio much under XP as I pretty much always use a Sound Blaster card...
@@philscomputerlab I normally use it on my CRT monitor plus normal speakers but once hooked it up to our 4K TV, playing Elite Force on the couch just because I could. :D This was when I run into these problems.
You mentioning Haswell just reminded me, that I still have my old i5 4690k PC standing around unused. I should try if I can get WinXP including drivers running on this system. It would be awesome to get my soon to be replaced 1070 running under XP.
Does it make any difference using Windows XP 64 bit edition when you have GPU's with a few gigabytes of ram vs 32-bit Windows XP? I've only ran Windows XP 64-bit in Hyper-V and it ran a lot faster than XP-32 bit. I kind of wish I would have had more RAM and 64 bit xp back in the day when it was still supported!
Because the focus on the channel is Gaming, I always stick with 32 Bit windows. Have t had any issues yet.
I am still waiting to find out about modifying AMD drivers for GCN cards on XP such as the Radeon Pro WX2100/3100/4100 ect.
As someone who is running a GTX 970 in a Windows XP/Vista/7 multiboot gaming PC, the one major issue I had with using a newer Nvidia card is that in a small handful of 3D games under XP, there are vertex explosion graphical glitches. These are the games I tested that had those issues:
Extreme Bullrider
Lego Island 2: The Brickster's Revenge
Looney Tunes: Sheep Raider
Missile Command (1999)
Roller Coaster Factory
Sega Rally Championship
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six
I also had the same graphical glitches with a GTX 650 Ti in another PC, so this is very likely a driver issue.
Awesome thanks for that list gives me something to test. Yes similar to 98 often older cards and older drivers more compatible.
I have another one for your list: Battlefield 2
On any nvidia driver v334.89 and later and Radeon driver v11.4 and later you'll get black spots if you put terrain quality on anything but low.
Was looking up the Nvidia tesla P4 8 gb cards the otherday, wonder if they would be viable for a rom set up also
GCN is the same from the HD 7970 up to the Vega 64, modify the Vega drivers is a option...
With ver. 370 and later, nVidia ceased XP support.
368.81 is the latest version with XP support but with a twist... some models supported in previous versions have been removed. Initial driver ver. 344.11 had support for GTX 980 but since then the "official" version on nVidia download page does not have it. Luckily, good old boys over at Guru3D still host the initial version.
Oh, and... I am sure I have a driver that supports GTX 690 under XP... somewhere. As far as nVidia is concerned, it is not supported... although it is pretty much two GTX 680 slapped together. There is that 09/29/2021 technical note which states:
"The following SLI features are not supported on Windows XP:
- Geforce GTX 680, 670 SLI
- Quad SLI technology using GeForce GTX 590, GeForce 9800 GX2 or GeForce GTX 295
- 3-way SLI technology"
hummm...
I'm having issues with my k620 and XP, Minecraft says "no opengl context found" and claims it's a driver issue. Do you think that could be it and have any clue how I can solve it?
Excellent. Keep upgrading my xp retro pc as i get new parts. I currently have an Intel Pentium G3260 with 4gb of ram, ssd, and a GTX 550 TI. I have a GTX 970 but I don't want to waste it for XP since I use it on a W10 HTPC that I use as an xbox to play an xbox 360 controller from the comfort of my couch. I also have an i5 4400 cpu and an i7 4790 which I think are too much for xp. It never worked for me to have more than 2 cores in XP, I had to disable several from the affinity options or from the bios. I think it's a waste. On the other hand, I don't know if it's worth building a Windows 7 retro PC just yet. I think most of the games work on Windows 10 which is what I have on my main gaming pc. Maybe the day I upgrade my current rig, I'll dedicate the GTX 970 to XP. If I could use the GTX 550 ti on Windows 98 that would be great.
I'm running my X5460 quad core just fine under XP. The OS itself has no problem there and (in theory) supports up to 32 CPUs.
@@HappyBeezerStudios I wanted to say that only in some games I had to lower the amount of cores from affinity since I had problems.
Interesting Video!
Hi Phil, since 2015 I work with a HP Z820 with a Nvidia Quadro K6000 (12GB) and I also had issues with 4K (4096x2160). After many trials and errors I found the strange solution: turn off ECC in the Nvidia Control Panel. From that time until now, the machine has run smoothly and still operates the big software (Adobe etc.). Don't know whether this could be the same problem, and whether the M6000 suffers the same problem, but I've never turned the ECC on again and it's still still running great. Maybe, when my machine will retire, i will make it a bad ass retro machine. Thanks for the video.
Thanks for the tip!
The enemy AI in F.E.A.R is among the best I have ever seen in a game, it puts some modern games to shame.
The AI itself isn't super impressive, but the way it's implemented in the game is just marvelous. It's not simply "throw enemy AI package number 5 in there", but everything is crafted to work together.
On the nvidia website there is a firmware update for displayport from GTX 700 to GTX 1000 with some fixes. Maybe it can fix the low refresh rate in 4k.
Hmmm I wonder if I could get one in my pentium 4 Sony Vaio...
May be someone already mentioned it but yes you can enable the same AA options on any nvidia GPU with "NVIDIA Inspector" (But not the latest version, you need version which has built in profile inspector, newer version has it as a separate application, I don't remember the exact version unfortunately)
I remember enabling 32Sx (2x2SSAA + 8x MSAA) or 32x CSAA plus 8x SGSSAA, looked amazing.
There is a typo in the description-- gtx 870.
And for Phils’s next trick… gpu scaling and full rgb color on windows xp 😊
😮 How did you know 😅
This is just a fact of life for those using laptops with an mxm slot and wanting to upgrade when possible, ngreedia did eventually drop the lockout for some cards but the rest you have to do this. The worst of the lot to get working will be the Tesla models for both the desktop and for laptops due to all the lockouts. Kinda funny that some of the mxm cards out there started their life as car parts being used for the infotainment and self driving feature in some Tesla cars lol.
The Quadro M6000 is pretty expensive on ebay while the Tesla M40 is pretty cheap. I wonder if there's a way to use the M40 for graphics processing with another gpu outputting the graphics.
Would have to wait until someone figured a way to backport that feature to XP. The first known case of this working was Nvidia Optimus in windows Vista.
You could probably drive 2K(but not 4K) 60Hz out in analogue using the DVI socket with a VGA adapter in Windows XP, but that would bring up the issue of where the heck you'd find a capable monitor with VGA in.
I still keep GTX460 and GTX275 for ultimate XP gaming PC, I know, there were better cards with official XP support, but these 2 are more than enough for anything I need to play on it. FaCry with some P4 and 7600GT is still pretty slow, but on GTX275 with C2Q, that's total overkill. 😀
Nice tip about getting more antialiasing options with quadro cards, compared to geforce. What i don't like is widespread trend of reflashing bioses of quadro cards to make them basicaly geforce with different outputs. Have no idea what is benefit of that as drivers are almost same, but quadro's have more optimisations of Opengl enabled and looks like also more driver options.
Still need to see video of what are benefits of flashing quadros....to me its plain stupid.
Sadly modern nvidia cards don't support CSAA anymore. In games where it worked, it was amazing, and in those games where it didn't work, it was as good as the MSAA level it's based on.
Your so cool for making this❤
AFAIK, not every Quadro cards do support PhysX. I wonder if it is also possible to modify the driver in order for them to support?
Interesting! I do want to checkout PhysX at some point.
Looking for a pcie USB 3.0 card that 100% supports Windows 2000. Any suggestion?
Hello. Please help me. Is it possible to modify gtx 970m from a laptop? I found the laptop with i7 4710hq and I hope i can install win xp on it. Since it was originally pre installed with win 7
Quadro M6000 lists for ~$800 used where I live, so not sure how is that a good option.
GTX980 lists for around $90 for that matter.
I didn't day it was, it's what I happened to have at hand 🙂
It would be a good use for my PCI heavy Z87 board, i5 4400 and GTX 650ti and another SoundBlaster Live!. I'd only need to buy a case and PSU to assemble the PC.
The same moment when your VCard have more RAM than system RAM .)
Same VRAM than RTX 4070 😂😂😂😂
@@philscomputerlab , Please do not offend silicon rejects)🤣
Great video
Does this works on the x64 version of windows xp? As far as i know they don't get the newest driver from icafe like x86 does