What do my results mean Effect size is not the same as statistical significance. With Tom Reader.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9

  • @ChisomOkolie12
    @ChisomOkolie12 14 днів тому

    This was amazing! 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

  • @rosaevee274
    @rosaevee274 2 роки тому +2

    Tom continues to be the most underrated Stats expert on UA-cam. He's excellent at providing intuition for crucial concepts, and he actually knows how to use a microphone!

  • @Kuan-LiangWuThemis
    @Kuan-LiangWuThemis 24 дні тому

    Great explanation, easy to understand and interesting

  • @Onnuuzeln
    @Onnuuzeln 4 роки тому +10

    the bants on this lad are absolutely out of control
    also v good explanation, make more

  • @aceroyplatadeluna
    @aceroyplatadeluna 4 роки тому +8

    this was just what I was looking for :) thanks for the clear and witty explanation.

  • @Nollyton
    @Nollyton 3 роки тому +2

    Informative and amusing. Thanks!

  • @majamuster2470
    @majamuster2470 Рік тому

    Amazing Video, one question: Why would we look at r squared to get the effect size in the case of a linear relationship and not on the beta coefficient? The beta coefficient would tell us how much the dependent variable changes with 1 unit change in the independent variable, isn’t this the proper way to assess the meaningfulness of an effect?

  • @taladiv3415
    @taladiv3415 Рік тому

    4:48 "if I was" or "if I were" ..?

  • @Rdizzle512
    @Rdizzle512 3 роки тому

    Great video