Tense Cross of Psychologist in Depp v. Heard Pt. 1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 лис 2024
  • #AmberHeard's attorney challenged psychologist, Dr. Shannon Curry, on her borderline #PersonalityDisorder diagnosis of Heard. Dr. Curry also testified that Heard did not have PTSD and concluded that Heard tried to fake the symptoms for attention as part of her disorders.
    WATCH #CourtTV LIVE - #JohnnyDeppVsAmberHeard - court.tv/live
    COURT TV IS BACK! 24/7 LIVE gavel-to-gavel coverage, in-depth legal reporting, and expert analysis of the nation’s most important and compelling trials.
    WATCH COURT TV LIVE:
    www.courttv.co...
    WATCH TRIALS ON DEMAND:
    www.courttv.co...
    WHERE TO WATCH:
    www.courttv.co...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 395

  • @CourtTV
    @CourtTV  2 роки тому +3

    WATCH #CourtTV LIVE - #JohnnyDeppVsAmberHeard - court.tv/FindUs

  • @pranamiracles
    @pranamiracles 2 роки тому +151

    This doctor is amazing. Giving back to the old attorney with sane force. Admire her ability handle such pressure and nonsense

    • @tellthetruthna8523
      @tellthetruthna8523 2 роки тому +4

      She auditioned and won the roll. Nice payday coming. The jury will see right through this tactic. Especially after the defense puts on their own expert who was actually a treating psychologist and not just a hired gun.

    • @yourlocalopp_
      @yourlocalopp_ 2 роки тому

      @@tellthetruthna8523 maybe the most delusional person I’ve read comment about something on this trial. Supporting Amber in this is delusional as it is but this is by far the most mentally deficient belief I’ve heard.

    • @Christina4758
      @Christina4758 2 роки тому

      She's not a doctor, she's a psychologist. The "old" lawyer is doing a great job at discrediting her and showing how Depp's attorneys committed malpractice.

    • @hithere3897
      @hithere3897 2 роки тому +3

      No I don’t think that but I do think she’s biased
      But all expert witnesses hired by either party are. It’s why are system is not fair. The witnesses should never have been solicited or hired by any subject or party or there attorneys. They should be court appointed and preferably randomly

    • @yourlocalopp_
      @yourlocalopp_ 2 роки тому +2

      @@Christina4758 it’s definitely the other way around. Dr. Curry clearly corrected Ambers attorney on many occasions. Correcting her on misinformation. Ambers attorney even tried to get Dr. Curry to explain why Amber is a victim through questioning behaviours related to victims of abuse and she accidentally proved Depp the be the victim more than Amber.

  • @michelejackson7934
    @michelejackson7934 2 роки тому +41

    Wow, she is killing it.

  • @shirleyrusaw5181
    @shirleyrusaw5181 5 місяців тому +1

    Elaine just got sustained about Johnny saying Amber had disorder she repeats the very same question I wish Johnny team would speak up

  • @mindurslide
    @mindurslide 2 роки тому +9

    the fact the lawyer kept using all those fancy attorney terms clearly trying to confuse her

  • @Magoro2249
    @Magoro2249 2 роки тому +32

    This lawyer is focusing on trying to discredit the psychologist instead of focusing on clarifying to everyone the fact that borderline/histrionic diagnostic does not necessarily make someone violent or abusive. She just don't seem to know anything about psychology. This Doctor is awesome!!

    • @ynazzra
      @ynazzra 2 роки тому +2

      Exactly! The lawyer is thousands of steps behind. Had she highlighted what you’re mentioning here, I feel she’d have a stronger argument.

  • @bowtangey6830
    @bowtangey6830 2 роки тому +1

    Heard's lawyer lost control. The tail was wagging the dog. 😁

  • @Dragonhart212
    @Dragonhart212 2 роки тому +26

    I could listen to her all day. What she said made scenes.The way she explained things helped me really understand what Jonny went through and why he feels the way he does...

    • @hithere3897
      @hithere3897 2 роки тому

      His feelings are almost certainly justified. But that doesn’t equate to being slandered. And that doesn’t equate to $50 million dollars.

    • @ihateutube1143
      @ihateutube1143 2 роки тому

      I could listen and look at her all day

    • @wintercomesearly
      @wintercomesearly 2 роки тому

      @@hithere3897 That is the argument AH attorneys will try to make. She did smear him. Judge's instructions to jury will be critical.

  • @Relaxjack310
    @Relaxjack310 2 роки тому +8

    Wow this Woman, this psychologist, is amazing, I truly admire the way she carried herself. You can clearly see the attorneys trying to entrap her into saying something that could be misconstrued, the psychologist did not buckle! Bravo!

  • @rachelyisulboone
    @rachelyisulboone 2 роки тому +50

    Dr. Curry is just handling it with grace. She has the patience of a saint with that lawyer.

    • @SkySharma
      @SkySharma 2 роки тому

      Dr. Curry has more than 15 years of experience providing therapy and assessment services across military, forensic, and community settings.
      As Director of the Curry Psychology Group, Dr. Curry helps military and civilian clients transform their relationships, overcome grief and trauma, and achieve overall life improvement. She is committed to social justice work, and serves on the advisory board for the University of California Center for Unconventional Security Affairs (CUSA); engaging in research and programming to address global issues of poverty, warfare, violence, and sustainability. Her own research on culturally-responsive trauma therapy in international communities has received awards from the American Psychological Association and Psychology Beyond Borders.
      Dr. Curry regularly serves as a psychologist expert and independent forensic evaluator for state courts, law enforcement agencies, the U.S. military, and private attorneys. She enjoys utilizing her psychological expertise to provide clear, articulate, and well-researched opinions in both civil and criminal matters. Dr. Curry is a certified forensic examiner for the Hawaii Department of Courts and Corrections and a registered psychological evaluator for California courts and law enforcement agencies.

    • @katethegreat2222
      @katethegreat2222 2 роки тому +3

      @@SkySharma wtf?
      Are you her manager?

    • @Christina4758
      @Christina4758 2 роки тому +1

      Lawyer is doing a great job discrediting her.

    • @SkySharma
      @SkySharma 2 роки тому

      @@katethegreat2222 Dr. Shannon Curry is a clinical and forensic psychologist, licensed in both California and Hawaii. She owns the Curry Psychology Group, a leading multi-specialty counseling center in Orange County, CA, and has 15 years of experience conducting research, therapy, and psychological evaluations pertaining to trauma, violence, and relationships.

    • @SkySharma
      @SkySharma 2 роки тому

      @@Christina4758 Dr. Shannon Curry is a clinical and forensic psychologist, licensed in both California and Hawaii. She owns the Curry Psychology Group, a leading multi-specialty counseling center in Orange County, CA, and has 15 years of experience conducting research, therapy, and psychological evaluations pertaining to trauma, violence, and relationships.

  • @noogzilla
    @noogzilla 2 роки тому +50

    I feel like this lawyer is trying to make the psychologist look like she messed up...but the psychologist is solid.

    • @missniney9970
      @missniney9970 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah the muffins thing is stupid

  • @sarabrown7488
    @sarabrown7488 11 місяців тому +1

    That lawyer saying ambers lawyer proved the doctor was lying is a joke

  • @shirleyrusaw5181
    @shirleyrusaw5181 4 місяці тому +1

    Elaine,don't you think it's a little odd and bias that Amber had dinner at the Judges house for how long BIAS

  • @ColoradoMelody
    @ColoradoMelody 2 роки тому +44

    OMG
    Could old lady lawyer BE more condescending and dominant?

    • @OceanBaby813
      @OceanBaby813 2 роки тому +4

      I find most old lady lawyers to be. Orthopedic shoes and all

    • @melsmith8966
      @melsmith8966 2 роки тому +5

      She is not doing a good job for her client, are they not seeing this on Heards side?

    • @hithere3897
      @hithere3897 2 роки тому +1

      Well is it a success if in a 300+ transcript the defense finds 2-3 inconsistencies with flipped answers?

    • @January.
      @January. 2 роки тому +1

      RUDE

    • @ColoradoMelody
      @ColoradoMelody 2 роки тому +2

      @@hithere3897 But DID they?
      I saw that when they "thought " they had discredited a witness, it was by using "partial" testimony & not the entire phrase.
      The only witness discredited was the one who saw headlines & clips of court proceedings.
      And that was mislead.

  • @rosien7334
    @rosien7334 2 роки тому +36

    According to Amber's lawyer's, only Amber is telling the truth , everyone else is lying or out to get her.

    • @janiznick
      @janiznick 2 роки тому +4

      Thats there job.

    • @terrymeare4742
      @terrymeare4742 2 роки тому

      Whilst I'm skeptical of the situation, it is her job to prove Amber to br telling the truth.

    • @m.h.1783
      @m.h.1783 2 роки тому +1

      She brainwashed them with all that passive aggressiveness

    • @January.
      @January. 2 роки тому +1

      @@janiznick *their

  • @maxbigaveli3791
    @maxbigaveli3791 2 роки тому +41

    Her opinion and doing her job are two totally different things. Your not really getting anywhere. This woman is just like the guy asking if he reads right.

    • @liz090833
      @liz090833 2 роки тому +3

      Legend has it he is still in the courtroom, it is empty and he is still repeating one question- "DiD I ReAd THat RiGHt?"🤣😆😁

    • @January.
      @January. 2 роки тому

      *You're not really....

    • @maxbigaveli3791
      @maxbigaveli3791 2 роки тому

      @@January. Scat.! Get outta here.!

    • @January.
      @January. 2 роки тому

      @@maxbigaveli3791 No

  • @juliaxo2872
    @juliaxo2872 2 роки тому +4

    One can’t always remember childhood trauma. I read borderline is often due to bad connection between mother and child.

  • @melsmith8966
    @melsmith8966 2 роки тому +33

    This attorney is very unlikeable.

    • @eileenwatt8283
      @eileenwatt8283 2 роки тому +3

      She's cancelled any future chances of being hired. Her own incompetence cause that

    • @syljm515
      @syljm515 2 роки тому +2

      Very unlikeable... Amber's male attorney as well.

    • @adrienne3802
      @adrienne3802 2 роки тому +1

      It's not an attorney's job to be likeable.

    • @syljm515
      @syljm515 2 роки тому +1

      @@adrienne3802 his comment is not about this attorney not doing her job. It's just about her being unlikeable.

    • @melsmith8966
      @melsmith8966 2 роки тому +3

      If you want to win it helps a bunch! The people in the jury are human.

  • @cscotet4202
    @cscotet4202 2 роки тому +40

    Just watch.....these muffins are gonna crack the case wide open!!! This from the same lawyer that said Amber used a specific make-up daily to cover her bruises and cuts from 2014 to 2016. Yet, the make-up company says it wasn't available until Dec. 2017.

    • @janiznick
      @janiznick 2 роки тому +3

      Do you know the muffin man?

    • @ynazzra
      @ynazzra 2 роки тому

      @@janiznick that is the REAL question 🤔😅

  • @r_r_guisella3907
    @r_r_guisella3907 2 роки тому +2

    I love te way dr. Shannon Curry refresses her memory!!❤
    No cheat sheets need it.

  • @gaylemattsson4166
    @gaylemattsson4166 2 роки тому +6

    The psychologist was brilliant and wouldn’t be intimidated by the lawyer and being bullied

  • @Ms.Andrist
    @Ms.Andrist 2 роки тому +24

    Amber's attorney is CLEARLY over her head. Has NO idea about anything related to psychology.

  • @lornaallan2283
    @lornaallan2283 2 роки тому +3

    Heard's Lawyer is one rude individual! I don't know why the Judge allows this, the witness isn't on trial! 🤬

  • @kristinekrohn7231
    @kristinekrohn7231 2 роки тому +12

    Are we surprised at these diagnosis!!?? This Dr. Nails all of the current research and so eloquently explains it all . So cool under pressure . Defense is trying to rattle her. But not happening.. she is armed with knowledge. Hope jury appreciates this..

  • @mkub5662
    @mkub5662 2 роки тому +9

    Very good expert witness. Credible, clear, polite, unflappable.

  • @AirspotterUK
    @AirspotterUK 2 роки тому +3

    Shout out to the court reporter in this case!!!

  • @tmp1111
    @tmp1111 2 роки тому +12

    I'm an expert witness/therapist in the Fairfax Court System in VA. She's very good on the stand and really does a good job.

  • @bonniewingard9771
    @bonniewingard9771 2 роки тому +12

    What kind of beautiful glasses is Dr sporting.. I'd like those.

  • @carolerandolph4409
    @carolerandolph4409 2 роки тому +17

    I could literally see the lawyer's blood pressure rising 🤣 I really don't understand what she was trying to accomplish. "Do you recall" another person's testimony? And the dinner and drinks.... she was trying to make it sound like a date! But also the whole muffins thing. It was almost comical! Most of all, kudos to the psychologist 👏 👏👏

    • @hithere3897
      @hithere3897 2 роки тому

      She caught a few inconsistencies which for her is probably a success. She’s trying to discredit her

    • @MrNixtt
      @MrNixtt 2 роки тому +4

      @@hithere3897 not real inconsistencies there. I would say the opposite the whole think showed how desperate Amber's side is to discredit her

  • @oldhollywoodfan8009
    @oldhollywoodfan8009 2 роки тому +1

    I hope Linda from LUCIFER plays Dr. Curry in the future movie or miniseries!😃😃😃 Rachael Harris would crack us up, especially when mentioning the muffins.😂😂😂

  • @cailyfe
    @cailyfe 2 роки тому +16

    She’s trying to impeach over ridiculous small things

  • @danielladasilva6973
    @danielladasilva6973 2 роки тому +1

    This lawyer is extremely disrespectful and condescending. She's not talking to a child. What in the world.

    • @bettythebeagle9074
      @bettythebeagle9074 2 роки тому +1

      It's embarrassing to watch her. She fails every single time she gets up there I'm shocked theyre still letting her speak to anyone

  • @eileenwatt8283
    @eileenwatt8283 2 роки тому +7

    If I remembered correctly the question earlier was "Had she ever testified in court before? The answer was " no". The word " bipolar " was never asked. It seems the manuscript she gave her is not what was actually ask. The psychologist should have read the whole thing. She only read "no".

    • @hithere3897
      @hithere3897 2 роки тому +2

      I cought 2-3 flipped answers but seriously the deposition was over 300 pages long and probably conducted years ago
      And some of the questions are very open ended not just straight yes or no

  • @michelejackson7934
    @michelejackson7934 2 роки тому +15

    The examiner is very negative and unpleasant.

  • @pamjs5722
    @pamjs5722 2 роки тому +5

    Shannon curry " my job is to assess behavior , not investigate crime"...yessss!!! Love this doc!

    • @shirleyrusaw5181
      @shirleyrusaw5181 4 місяці тому

      Dr Hughes testified abuse occurred that wasn't her job

  • @frenchexpat5601
    @frenchexpat5601 2 роки тому +37

    It's hilarious to watch an attorney attempting to break the ground of an actually trained, professional person whose very job is to read people. That's like me and my 50kg ass giving advice to a weightlifter on how to gain muscle

    • @hithere3897
      @hithere3897 2 роки тому

      Agreed on 98%. But that defense attorney did catch her in 2-3 flipped answers. Obviously she was being truthful but her job is to undermine her credibility

    • @January.
      @January. 2 роки тому

      Not all doctors and psychologists are competent.

    • @frenchexpat5601
      @frenchexpat5601 2 роки тому +1

      @@January. True, but they're always smarter than lawyers.

    • @littlepony8571
      @littlepony8571 2 роки тому

      No, others far more highly trained as well as a judge said Amber was assaulted dozens of times and has no evidence of the conditions they are trying to lay on her. Thia is sad to see the public so caught up in this

  • @roseramos2494
    @roseramos2494 2 роки тому +23

    Men as well have been victims to Domestic violence but bcuz of the gender their stories are made ridiculous. I have seen men ridiculed for saying the finally left an abusive relationship...
    More awareness should be done for men suffering Domestic violence.

    • @michelejackson7934
      @michelejackson7934 2 роки тому +7

      I worked 5 years as an administrative assistant and part-time DV/SA advocate. A lot of facilities don’t house men, but ours did. It was rare for men to come in, and a lot of that is because society conditions men to just tolerate abuse. I hope this case causes men to feel safer to come forward.

    • @tellthetruthna8523
      @tellthetruthna8523 2 роки тому

      Yes, there should be more awareness. But, an abusive, alcoholic, drug addict whose wealth & power far exceed his partner's is not the best spokesperson for male victims of domestic violence. It just looks like bullying to anyone who isn't in love with him.

    • @michelejackson7934
      @michelejackson7934 2 роки тому +2

      @@tellthetruthna8523 To be fair, the case should probably be dismissed. It seems they were mutually toxic, but she does look to be the aggressor.

    • @tellthetruthna8523
      @tellthetruthna8523 2 роки тому

      @@michelejackson7934 It should have been dismissed a long time ago. She has a first amd right to write an opinion piece saying she is a domestic violence survivor. She never even used his name or gave a single detail about their relationship. It would have all blown over by now had he not started filing lawsuits. Sad what people do to themselves and each other.

  • @loopthetube
    @loopthetube 2 роки тому +11

    Why is this lawyer reading questions that's already been testified to? Why didn't they call these doctors to testify if what they said was so important?

    • @eileenwatt8283
      @eileenwatt8283 2 роки тому +1

      She's trying to confuse the jurors to believe the lady on the stand is the person who presented those findings.

  • @Unique-lu3xq
    @Unique-lu3xq 2 роки тому +8

    This is frustrating to watch, “correct”?

  • @gabrielaabril456
    @gabrielaabril456 2 роки тому +1

    The lawyer was trying so hard that it made her look like a silly person! Great job by the psychologist ;)

  • @MelissaDeleen
    @MelissaDeleen 2 роки тому +26

    I always hear people saying: "Why did he or she stay so long?" - it's not an easy question for certain people. Let's remember that in order to have a successful abuser, you need to find a good victim that is unwilling to leave. As we can all see in this case, not only she has mental issues but also our Johnny grew up untreated from the childhood and adolescence mental and psychological wounds of a dysfunctional family. Johnny escaped, like many do, from the pain and shame through legal/illegal drugs and alcohol. Sweeping our inner struggles under the rug it's simply an illusion. The 'out of sight, out of mind' kind of thinking is not healthy. Many of us had dysfunctional families growing up. It's definitely not our fault, however once you have the means of getting help, you must address these issues! It's very important for our own health and it helps us to make good choices in life. I have no doubt that Johnny fell in love with Amber's outer beauty and missed the signs of an abuser. Great lesson for all of us. Unfortunately, for many of us is already too late as we recognize this type of behavior in our own skin. Sad but true.

    • @sharylanne7738
      @sharylanne7738 2 роки тому

      He didn’t stay that long. They were only married for 2 years!

    • @tinab3627
      @tinab3627 2 роки тому

      15 months is not a long time anyway in the big scheme of things

    • @janiznick
      @janiznick 2 роки тому +1

      Our Johnny, wtf does that even mean?

    • @littlepony8571
      @littlepony8571 2 роки тому

      Don't see her threatening to burn his body and put him in a trunk or other criminal threats or actions...lots of money to be made by the mess as typical in communities these days instead of the obvious reality of her suffering and response to get him to change seen for what it is and his abuse addressed. He should have been charged. Untold numbers of women suffer in exactly the same fashion. He refuses accountability and to take responsibility whatsoever as is so clear leaving her to fight impossibly for the relationship with such a disinterested person driving her to extremes

    • @cassandralayman831
      @cassandralayman831 2 роки тому +2

      @@littlepony8571 he wasn't threatening her he was saying that in a text to his friend. He never directly made that threat to her. You say he needs to take responsibility but this woman has made so many lies against his character where is her responsibility? She has made actual victims of abuse less likely to be believed because of her lies. You seem to think because she is a woman that she must be the victim but men can be victims too. Your mentality towards this case is exactly why most men don't come forward about their abuse.

  • @joellezima3506
    @joellezima3506 2 роки тому +13

    I love this lady. She know that if she doesn’t watch what she says, the attorney can use it against her, even if she misspoke. The attorney is great at her job but the psychiatrist is keeping up with her

  • @fernandaolivares7926
    @fernandaolivares7926 2 роки тому +3

    " Can I explain what that means?....No....🤣🤣🤣LOL

  • @songhenry1084
    @songhenry1084 2 роки тому +13

    Muffin fight lol. Lawyer is losing this one for trying to claim something out of nothing

  • @davy1629
    @davy1629 2 роки тому

    30:18 MARK!!! Defense dragged on the word PSYCHOOO. that's not the word i want my attorney to choose when defending me LMFAO

    • @shirleyrusaw5181
      @shirleyrusaw5181 4 місяці тому

      Jury is watching you harrassdr Curry you're not scoring any points with them Elaine

  • @theficklewitch6379
    @theficklewitch6379 2 роки тому +1

    W H E R E did she get these lawyers

  • @DaveDFX
    @DaveDFX 2 роки тому

    I can see why Netflix is down 70 percent. This is better than Netflix

  • @nnnnn3435
    @nnnnn3435 2 роки тому +2

    The way this lawyer goes at makes her easily disliked. That’s not a good thing

  • @va8382
    @va8382 2 роки тому +4

    Attorney is getting angry 🤦

  • @heatherjeanmorris8020
    @heatherjeanmorris8020 2 роки тому +9

    Love it she's a pro

  • @Joffar
    @Joffar 2 роки тому +5

    The attorney keeps attempting to make the relationship between the psychologist and Johnny Depp seem sordid, I'm guessing because the psychologist is an attractive female. I have to wonder if her line of questioning would be the same if the psychologist were a random, pudgy man?

  • @brianeaton9046
    @brianeaton9046 2 роки тому +20

    Geez, that lady lawyer is such a school marm. No way she is scoring points with the jury.

    • @tellthetruthna8523
      @tellthetruthna8523 2 роки тому

      The jury isn't comprised of Johnny stans.

    • @chrisgerald4536
      @chrisgerald4536 2 роки тому +3

      I think at this point she may be trying to score points with Ms Heard. I think Amber would be upset if she wasn't so aggressive. At some point, lawyers have to realize that they need to get paid once it's all over. I can see Amber withholding fees should she not be happy with the performance of her legal team.

    • @katethegreat2222
      @katethegreat2222 2 роки тому +1

      Ha ha great description !! She is very matronly.

    • @tellthetruthna8523
      @tellthetruthna8523 2 роки тому

      @@chrisgerald4536 I'm sure she got a retainer fee up front that will cover the trial. Stop making stuff up. You can do better.

    • @chrisgerald4536
      @chrisgerald4536 2 роки тому +1

      @@tellthetruthna8523 I've tried to do so in the past week. My friends have noticed too. Thaknk YOO!

  • @stephaniejacobs1267
    @stephaniejacobs1267 2 роки тому +1

    Isn't Johnny allowed to be part of his legal defense?

  • @dgatsf
    @dgatsf 2 роки тому +10

    Defense attorney long sigh. Frustrated?

  • @liz090833
    @liz090833 2 роки тому +16

    this woman's recall is beyond impressive! How does she just pull accurate data, with dates and multiple depositions by different clinicians? It's absolutely stunning how well this woman's brain functions, I wonder if it's genetic, or if there's something that she does to keep her mind so exacting. Does she take supplements, does she do brain building exercises? I just want to know bc I've had some cognitive changes lately. Things like punctuation or minor typos that would ever never occured a couple of years back are now a regular occurrence. 😆 Send help! Dr. Curry, please divulge the secret... 🤣😭😁💯❤️

    • @Jackrazorus
      @Jackrazorus 2 роки тому +1

      I have similar experience. I have a friend of mine who at some point started making typos quite frequently, so I was making fun of her since she actually studied linguistics. And now I have noticed that I am starting to make typos more frequently too.
      I have actually heard before, that lack of physical activity can affect that too. Since COVID started, I worked mostly from home office and at one point I stopped going to gym too and I have noticed my focus and my memory went down too.
      Is it possible you went through decline in physical activity too?

  • @JGmeow
    @JGmeow 2 роки тому +3

    An MMPI doesn't lie. if it's followed up with interviews to clarify. Amber's cluster B traits are consistent with everything that we know about her. She is definitely BPD and histrionic.

  • @charlesmartinjr3971
    @charlesmartinjr3971 2 роки тому +13

    "Do you recall someone else saying something?"
    Not a lawyer, so would someone please explain how this isn't hearsay, because I seem to have the definitions muddled.

    • @tellthetruthna8523
      @tellthetruthna8523 2 роки тому

      There are nearly thirty exceptions to the hearsay rule under the federal rules of evidence; state rules can vary somewhat. I'm not going to watch the full cross-exam to try to figure out what you are referring to but suffice it to say the hearsay rule is not what non-lawyers believe it is. It's complicated.

    • @joellezima3506
      @joellezima3506 2 роки тому +2

      To be completely honest with you, I think it is hearsay. Sometimes the attorney can get away with it if it’s not caught by the other team: if they don’t object for “hearsay”, she can continue. I think you caught something the legal team missed or just didn’t think was important

    • @IDalexy
      @IDalexy 2 роки тому +2

      In this case, since she is being used as an examiner for the case she had access to the other doctors’ notes to thoroughly review accounts. Since she was brought upon the case to examine other experts’ information to form an opinion, she is able to use those details to form a professional opinion as she is unbiased within the case. Since this is civil court, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff though- so my understanding is that to bring suit she is meant to provide context for the situation it doesn’t mean she is rooting for any side, even if she was hired by counsel on one side or another. Ultimately this allows everyone to better understand what would have led Amber to make accusations + slander Johnny.
      The best thing for Amber’s team would have been to play into her having symptoms of the fore mentioned disorders, coming to terms with her abusing Johnny and using that to settle.
      But since she is going all out to prove she was telling the truth she is just making herself look bad.

    • @tellthetruthna8523
      @tellthetruthna8523 2 роки тому

      @@joellezima3506 I don't know what question the op is asking about. He didn't provide a timestamp. But, unless it involves an out of court statement made for the purpose of proving the truth of the matter asserted it's not hearsay. If it is hearsay the analysis turns to whether it meets one of the many exceptions to the rule. You are right that not all hearsay, or potential hearsay, is objected to.

    • @tellthetruthna8523
      @tellthetruthna8523 2 роки тому

      @@IDalexy What are you talking about? Amber didn't bring this lawsuit. I doubt JD wants to settle although he should. The rest of your comment is just word salad.

  • @bodhi8260
    @bodhi8260 2 роки тому +1

    The lawyer is getting ideas into the jurors mind through her questions. Shouldn't be allowed. Courts are mostly games.

  • @whateverrrrrr123
    @whateverrrrrr123 2 роки тому +2

    That Lady Lawyer is sickening duh

  • @Southernburrito
    @Southernburrito 2 роки тому +2

    Geeze, this cross examination attorney gives me the Charlie Browns. WAA WA WAA WA WAAA WA-WA-WA-WA!
    Absolutely NO Columbo, Perry Mason, Matlock, Jessica Fletcher moment for the cross examination attorney whatsoever. NONE!

  • @connieblackmon3932
    @connieblackmon3932 2 роки тому

    I'm about to come on glued. I'm asking questions Amber's attorney is not asking and all I've ever done is Watch court TV trials

  • @AirspotterUK
    @AirspotterUK 2 роки тому +14

    I wonder what the Dr diagnosed that lawyer with???

    • @roxiane
      @roxiane 2 роки тому

      Karen syndrome 🤣

    • @syljm515
      @syljm515 2 роки тому +5

      I was thinking the same... lol

    • @WoodlandAsh
      @WoodlandAsh 2 роки тому +5

      ‘Condescending old bag disorder’

    • @shirleyrusaw5181
      @shirleyrusaw5181 6 місяців тому

      A-D-D

  • @pranamiracles
    @pranamiracles 2 роки тому +8

    I guess the attorney did not hear the doctor mention about the muffins clearly. Such a waste of time asking about the muffins again when they came back.

  • @traceygeer797
    @traceygeer797 2 роки тому +11

    Well apparently Amber was able to lie her way through with the 40 years experience therapists that probably has an old way of diagnosis! Amber is everything that this therapist has diagnosed her!

  • @traceygeer797
    @traceygeer797 2 роки тому +4

    So I’m wondering if any of Ambers Co - workers ever notice any of her allegations of being beaten up?

    • @Jackrazorus
      @Jackrazorus 2 роки тому

      I am guessing in general any victim of domestic abuse have tendencies to cover their bruises. And especially in case of an actor, when she is filming, her bruises would be covered by make up artist, when auditioning, most people doent see her regularly. So if she didnt happen to be filming, her only regular contact professionaly would be her agent.

  • @ModernPlumbingFan
    @ModernPlumbingFan 2 роки тому +2

    Yeah, but do you know the muffin man?
    = went to law school for this.

  • @jue0804
    @jue0804 2 роки тому +15

    Well Done Amber Heards lawyers,for putting professional people down,and discounting their qualifications. And thank you for allowing Domestic abusers to get away with abuse,and the victim to be betrayed as the abuser. This is why so many victims get murdered. Hope you sleep well

  • @puddin2395
    @puddin2395 2 роки тому +2

    Do u know the muffin man… The one who lives on jury lane?

  • @califcamper
    @califcamper 2 роки тому +10

    This is all insanity

    • @tellthetruthna8523
      @tellthetruthna8523 2 роки тому

      It's just sad. Johnny is dragging both of them through the mud. The studios aren't going to hire him no matter what the outcome and he knows it. He is uninsurable. His relationship with his ex-wife would have blown over had he not started filing lawsuits. Not many people read her op ed piece and he knows that too.

  • @kalenanmn1140
    @kalenanmn1140 2 роки тому +2

    I am loving Dr Curry here...FIGHTING

  • @debbiemaclean4232
    @debbiemaclean4232 2 роки тому +1

    If it was me I think the lawyer would have made me feel guilty even if I wasn,t .Of course the payout to Hurds lawyer if they win would be very significant.

  • @jacksmom3612
    @jacksmom3612 2 роки тому +12

    Who is the heavy breather? His mic needs to be turned off.

    • @cailyfe
      @cailyfe 2 роки тому +1

      Sounds like it’s Johnny

    • @IBCHARLALALA
      @IBCHARLALALA 2 роки тому +3

      It's "The Cat-Lady-Badger Defense Lawyer breathing into that podium mic.

    • @cailyfe
      @cailyfe 2 роки тому

      @@IBCHARLALALA yooooooo 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @sandramurphy4681
      @sandramurphy4681 2 роки тому

      Sounds like someone’s asleep

    • @jacksmom3612
      @jacksmom3612 2 роки тому

      @San Dra lol!!!

  • @sandramurphy4681
    @sandramurphy4681 2 роки тому +3

    Who is breathing heavy during the doc?

    • @hunacre
      @hunacre 2 роки тому +1

      Thank you!!!! It's so annoying

  • @suzanneraymundo5835
    @suzanneraymundo5835 2 роки тому +2

    Lawyer's trying to discredit dr curry with how her findings is somehow different from the previous psych's findings and being unprofessional eating with depp and her husband bringing muffins for amber. She's limiting the questions into a yes or no answer creating nuances with the dr's answers. Dr curry's done well with adding snippets of information to counter that. The lawyer's actually good at creating negative nuances. It's just she, like many of Amber's team members, has a lot of bloopers.

  • @ararune3734
    @ararune3734 2 роки тому +1

    This psychologist looks like Felicity Smoak from Arrow, so fine and intelligent

  • @leighinreallife7386
    @leighinreallife7386 2 роки тому +10

    This lawyer is so condescending and thinks she’s Perry Mason or something. It’s hilariously sad 😂

  • @juliaxo2872
    @juliaxo2872 2 роки тому +1

    I really don’t know why borderline matters so much. Its not common behavior in borderline women to physically abuse. Emotionally abuse perhaps but not physical.

  • @straykitten4998
    @straykitten4998 2 роки тому +2

    Amber having dinner in the courtroom. What was Amber eating in court?

    • @wintercomesearly
      @wintercomesearly 2 роки тому

      Shades of the UK trial and the elevator scene of her picking through and throwing away food on the carpet. She seems to be a weird grazer.

    • @straykitten4998
      @straykitten4998 2 роки тому

      @@wintercomesearly What??

    • @wintercomesearly
      @wintercomesearly 2 роки тому +2

      @@straykitten4998 How she handles food. You recall how she chewed food while the attorneys waited for her to swallow while taking depositions in the UK? Then there's the CCTV of her and friends at the elevator in Columbia East, they're holding the elevator for her while she leisurely picks through a plate of take out and throws the pieces she doesn't want over her shoulder to the floor. Bizarre.

  • @sharylanne7738
    @sharylanne7738 2 роки тому +2

    Who is breathing so hard ?

  • @HappyCatHappyLife
    @HappyCatHappyLife 2 роки тому

    Who is breathing so loud? Distracting…..

  • @pharaohmedjaylawofmedjay2680
    @pharaohmedjaylawofmedjay2680 2 роки тому +3

    Welp this changes everything then Miss Heard

  • @ColoradoMelody
    @ColoradoMelody 2 роки тому +2

    Why did Amber submit to this examination?
    Curiouser & curiouser

    • @melsmith8966
      @melsmith8966 2 роки тому +2

      I think it was court ordered.

    • @kardiojunkee
      @kardiojunkee 2 роки тому +1

      I also think she could lie her way through and cheat the system

    • @rosien7334
      @rosien7334 2 роки тому +2

      Amber was claiming that she had PTSD, so the court ordered her to have an IME. Amber was initially trying to have the court order Johnny to have an IME, but Johnny wasn't claiming to have a mental issue. Abusing alcohol and drugs is not a valid reason to undergo an IME.

    • @shirleyrusaw5181
      @shirleyrusaw5181 4 місяці тому

      There was an objection to the one question and before judge could rule Elaine slipped the answer in she is so sneaky even at sidebars she argued with the Judge tried everything to get her lies in

  • @jenijohnson7096
    @jenijohnson7096 2 роки тому +2

    bipolar and borderline are not the same

  • @cdcdogs4961
    @cdcdogs4961 2 роки тому +5

    🖤 Amber’s attorney thinks she is Perry Mason. 🥴👏🏼🤣

  • @angelmorrigan7680
    @angelmorrigan7680 2 роки тому +5

    can u imagine being married to this attorney elaine? it would be as bad as being married to amber!! yikes!!

  • @NaoTech85
    @NaoTech85 2 роки тому +9

    jail Amber Heard

  • @aaronstone1528
    @aaronstone1528 2 роки тому +4

    Omg I thought the psychiatrist was smoking until the glasses went on now I am speechless

  • @vaderlucas5775
    @vaderlucas5775 2 роки тому

    What if the attorney was getting evaluated by Mrs Curry the whole time and she has a disorder? 😆

  • @job2358
    @job2358 2 роки тому

    That attorney trying so hard to be good and relevant! 🤣

  • @danappleton9118
    @danappleton9118 2 роки тому

    i am confused.. in opening statement, they claim that she through a vodka bottle which took off the tip.. but then theyre now saying he cut it off?!?!!

  • @teupolaleba9991
    @teupolaleba9991 2 роки тому

    All I hear is you said you said.
    And I started singing ," he said one day you'll leave this world behind, so live a life you will remember 🤣
    Tired of hearing you said🙄

  • @sarastilson8669
    @sarastilson8669 2 роки тому +1

    What are these people, two?????? This is the behavior of two year Olds and we are suppose to look up to them?, sheesh

  • @kp7032
    @kp7032 2 роки тому

    The defence attorney keeps saying bipolar instead or Borderline Personality

  • @fortheladies771
    @fortheladies771 2 роки тому +7

    Whether you like her or not, this attorney is pretty good at her job. The other one has been making a fool of himself. He must not of been doing this long lol

    • @MissJaydeIMVU
      @MissJaydeIMVU 2 роки тому +5

      Now its her turn to play the fool

    • @Oswald_Thatendswald
      @Oswald_Thatendswald 2 роки тому +2

      He objected to his own question yesterday lol that's why she's asking the questions now

    • @deborahnewton1694
      @deborahnewton1694 2 роки тому +4

      Neither is very good

    • @cjtranslationsjasmine1815
      @cjtranslationsjasmine1815 2 роки тому +3

      No she is not. Not one bit. Are you watching the whole trial. This lady lost all credibility way back with Milani Cosmetics, and the famous bruise cream.

    • @shirleyrusaw5181
      @shirleyrusaw5181 4 місяці тому

      Rottenborn probably gave her the questions she isn't bright enough to ask her these questions

  • @nanacybersliver8411
    @nanacybersliver8411 2 роки тому +1

    Amber's lawyer is trying to pull the husband's trick and busy nitpicking. She is at her teeter,😁and can't get the psychologist to stuff up and it's not working! 😂🤣Psychologist, Dr Shannon Curry sticks to her A&Qs, word for word. Dr knows her professional standing without imitation from this laywer😊🙄😏

  • @bethb6851
    @bethb6851 2 роки тому +3

    Do you know the muffin man?

  • @edithbryce4608
    @edithbryce4608 2 роки тому +5

    Jesus, this attorney is so unlikeable and I find Amber's attorney's rude.
    Perhaps thats just my dislike for ms heard

  • @brusselsprout5851
    @brusselsprout5851 2 роки тому

    Am I the only one understanding Depp’s attorneys filed briefs quoting this psychologist on things she is saying here she never said? Am I confused?

    • @wintercomesearly
      @wintercomesearly 2 роки тому

      In early briefs AH attorneys are saying Depp's counsel made claims as to what Dr curry was going to testify. Here, she says she does not draw conclusions on legal matters so they may have overstepped. I don't know if that's true or if it has any consequence as re the defamation issue. Elaine was sure hammering it.

  • @rurockgstar
    @rurockgstar 2 роки тому

    Who is breathing so loudly in the background it’s so weird…

  • @terriedupuy1625
    @terriedupuy1625 Рік тому

    E. is trying so hard to be a spicy lawyer, to catch something. I don't think it's working. You need to be better than that.