For all the people that don't understand. He's saying the first object worked like a solar sail. Then another object. Object number 2! That was a booster, did a similar things, so maybe the first object was intelligently made. Also, the video is only an artist rendering of the data we received from the telescopes. So many people need to watch more science channels....
Thank you for this explanation - yes, the rendering is the one that has been commonly used in the media, but doesn't accurately depict what Dr. Loeb is describing!
@@VishnuMaayan All objects, natural or man-made. Just a thought: we are trying to determine if an object was designed by an intelligence similar to us, but we are new cosmologically speaking, and barely understand how many different prehuman objects there are, and how they might behave. We have a very long way to go before we can distinguish which kinds of movement suggest evidence of intelligence like ours.
Because Mars and venus are close to the habitable zone of our sun. If we were going to send a satellite of ours to the nearest star to check if there is life there we would send it so it arrives at the perfect time to pass their potentially habitable planets in one swoop.
….”All right, Beatrice, there was no alien. The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.” (MIB-Agent K)
@@brandonkinser4683 it had enough escape velocity to circle the sun and leave the solar system. Just because you don’t under science doesn’t mean it’s aliens every time hahahaja
@@kayzeaza ok you're right I dont completely UNDERSTAND science. Im learning later in life. I cant seem to fill my cup when it comes to space and the universe. Im not the only one that seems to think it was alien. And I guess the REAL SCIENTIST are wrong in their thinking as well. All im saying is the damn thing made a damn u turn in our galaxy and was one 0f the first that they know about or are telling us that entered from another galaxy. And i do think its alien in the sense of the meaning that it doesn't belong and is strange.
@@brandonkinser4683 and I’m telling you you’re an idiot for jumping to aliens instead of giving it some critical thought. And it didn’t make a “u turn” out of the solar system! It has enough escape velocity to boomerang around the sun and leave the solar system. Just because you don’t understand science means it’s aliens. Hahaha what a 🤡
When Oumuamua first noted to have accelerated it was never described as a push away from the sun just as an acceleration that slightly changed its trajectory. The two have nothing in common except they're both in space.
Could it be, that this object was moved by being flung by the sun's gravity the same way that we fling satellites to great distances using the moon 🌙 or a planet? 💫
The simplest of explanations is usually always the right one. And this looks more like a planetary fragment or something similar. As far as the movement the sun interacts with it like it would a solar sail. I am no expert, but not even the experts get things right. So, there is that.
So what they should do is go clean up the debris humans left in outer space and the lakes and oceans. May God forgive them for they know not what they do.
He's saying, (1) " no cometary trail" therefore not behaving like a normal comet; (2) pushed by sunlight like the nasa booster which is of small mass relative to surface because it is hallow inside and therefore the object could have been of almost same mass to surface characteristic... or maybe hallow inside...(3) it had a "cherry picking" trajectory... passing by habitable planets likr it was on an observatory mission
The man's story doesn't add up. The nearest planetary system is 4.5 lights years away. But the rocked booster he is talking about was launched in 1966. That is 56 years compared 4.5 light years.
The question wasn't "what pushed it" it was. How could it speed up and slightly change its trajectory. What pushed it is your term not the original question of acceleration. Sower of confusion.
He has ignored actual facts admit some of these incidents just so he can say nope... he just can admit that it's possible just like all the other skeptics
He is risking his career for coming out with this theory. Physicists are exceptionally brutal when it comes to alien-theories, you’re immediately outcasted and your integrity and intelligence are questioned 😕
Both items are the same items. We have sent so many items out into space where else is it suppose to go. These items have been out there since 1966. Man I was born in 1969. We still have a dog to find out there.
May have been artificial, and since there's no supporting evidence, the oh so important 'cover up' component can be added to give that argument additional weight with the puberty and under crowd.
So, I can then extrapolate that the natural object, if it is natural, and we have no evidence to support an oppositional opinion, must be quite light in mass vs its volume, therefore getting its push from the sun like the artificial rocket with thin walls. Nothing says it must be also be artificial from the given information, although one may choose to argue in either direction with this information alone.
So the thing stays in course for hundreds or millions of years just to get casually close to the only planet with life yet know, and by destiny it ejects natural gas, accelerates, changes its course and leaves the solar system just as we happen to detect it... Sure, nothing oddly weird here.. right...
You what gets me . Is that all this interplanetary talk of some type of intelligent unknown whatever . If we can send electronic satellite communications devices out of the solar system and they’re so much more advanced. They can send more than a rock I’m sure of it .
Not! It was a natural interstellar asteroid. If it didn't have much or any ice it would not produce a tail of debris. Just because there was no tail that does not mean the photons of the sun did not push it.
Does this suggest that light is actually affecting mass? Light is, as far as our current understanding of space is concerned, unfiltered in space…dark matter notwithstanding (at least until we have a better grasp on that plausibility)…time for another metaphysical journey. Thanks for the fuel.
but light is definitly affecting mass, for example thats how solar sails work. Photons bounce of a surface, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. what he's saying is that the rocketbooster had alot of surface area with relativly little mass because its hollow. the "comet" also had alot of surface area but its solid so also had alot of mass, so how was it affected so much by the sunlight if it had so much mass. would be easier the explain if it had little mass or was hollow, like a hollow spaceship.
Maybe dark energy and through out the galaxy and universe also. Gravitational pull and gravity out basically energy can unsee but in and out the universe. So grand of all mass then gravity.
It might have been more than sunlight. It could have been artificial inertia. That would be more interesting especially if it weighed hundreds of tons.
Roger from Mudfossil University channel suggested oumuamua is a Mudfossil giant finger. A colonel from the SSP INTERVIEWED by Linda Moulton Howe said he had boarded it. He said it was 1.5 billion years old and made by the Builder Race.
Every scientist that works in this field knows it is a living ship used to sustain life for long distance space travel so they don't need to fuel up and can grow food so they don't starve.
It would not surprise me in the slightest if this were to be an object built by humans during one of the lost ancient civilizations predating Egypt… maybe the pyramids were somehow part of the launch mechanism 🤷♂️ I mean, considering they managed to build the great pyramids before the Egyptians inherited them, I bet they were smart enough to get something to space and to make it orbit the Sun the way this object did, picking up speed gradually over the past 10,000+ years of human history only for it to return and us to find it today floating peacefully yet ominously by as if it’s calling for us, just like the mysteries of the great pyramid and Atlantis… I mean… all of this stuff is in our history of one simply stops listening to mainstream archeologists for a single moment… it’s all right there in the tablets and so on… we have tons of evidence for most of what I mentioned.
Rocket boosters boost the space craft into orbit, then fall back to the earth. That Rocket booster would have traveled light years to reach other habitable planets around other stars. But this "Rocket booster" was launched in 1966. This tale is highly suspect--- it doesn't add up. 🤥
@@Not_fit_to_be_President what are you talking about… a rocket body was in orbit around are sun (lots are). This person is saying the rock and the body both acted like solar sails.
@@Not_fit_to_be_Presidentyou need to understand english first, he is saying the second object acted like the first object and it was a rocket booster so the first object might be artificial as well. ufuf
For all the people that don't understand. He's saying the first object worked like a solar sail. Then another object. Object number 2! That was a booster, did a similar things, so maybe the first object was intelligently made. Also, the video is only an artist rendering of the data we received from the telescopes.
So many people need to watch more science channels....
not for nothing I understood a little bit of what dude said but you explained it much better thank you.
It's not conclusive figure it's a sat. Maybe very old from when we came here.
“That was a booster, did a similar things”
What?
Thank you for this explanation - yes, the rendering is the one that has been commonly used in the media, but doesn't accurately depict what Dr. Loeb is describing!
I don't disagree with you at all, but why the tumbling?
I love it when we have no idea what's going on.
Basically "we don't really know what it is, therefore it must be aliens"
Yes!
Lol
@@Bodhi_Sant no his whole point is “if it looks walks and talks like a duck couldn’t it be a duck?”
🤣😂🤦👏👏👏👏👏👏 right?! I'm lost. Are they saying we made those objects??? That's not right... Right? 🤣🤷🤪
From what NASA and all of the astrophysicists have told us over the decades, nothing in space will naturally be shaped like this..
I'm going zeppelin, screw NASA.
It's possible just unimaginably unlikely
Fermi paradox
The interesting part is that objects in space can be pushed by light.
By Objects does it mean 'non-natural' ?
@@VishnuMaayan I don't know. I guess all object can be pushed by photons.
I believe that you said light , yes true my friend.
Yes, sunlight (photons) can affect objects. However, in this case, it was solar wind.
@@VishnuMaayan
All objects, natural or man-made.
Just a thought: we are trying to determine if an object was designed by an intelligence similar to us, but we are new cosmologically speaking, and barely understand how many different prehuman objects there are, and how they might behave. We have a very long way to go before we can distinguish which kinds of movement suggest evidence of intelligence like ours.
FYI for people who clarification, light rays can push objects in space. Light does have some force to it.
THE universe is FULL OF mysteries AND this is ONE OF THEM
THE DAMN THING SPED UP WHEN IT PASSED BY EARTH 🌎 COME ON WHAT ROCK DOES THAT...
We have 3 more interstellar vistors headed this way . in case you missed it
Did you catch that he said pass by all the habitable planets!!
Because Mars and venus are close to the habitable zone of our sun. If we were going to send a satellite of ours to the nearest star to check if there is life there we would send it so it arrives at the perfect time to pass their potentially habitable planets in one swoop.
Only habitable planet I Know Is Earth. Sorry i stay with JackMa
Υes , strange comment.
Perhaps it mean potentially habitable planets
….”All right, Beatrice, there was no alien. The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.” (MIB-Agent K)
MIB predictive programing hhhhm?
ok well how the heck did it make a u turn and haul a$$ back out of the solar system?
@@brandonkinser4683 it had enough escape velocity to circle the sun and leave the solar system. Just because you don’t under science doesn’t mean it’s aliens every time hahahaja
@@kayzeaza ok you're right I dont completely UNDERSTAND science. Im learning later in life. I cant seem to fill my cup when it comes to space and the universe. Im not the only one that seems to think it was alien. And I guess the REAL SCIENTIST are wrong in their thinking as well. All im saying is the damn thing made a damn u turn in our galaxy and was one 0f the first that they know about or are telling us that entered from another galaxy. And i do think its alien in the sense of the meaning that it doesn't belong and is strange.
@@brandonkinser4683 and I’m telling you you’re an idiot for jumping to aliens instead of giving it some critical thought. And it didn’t make a “u turn” out of the solar system! It has enough escape velocity to boomerang around the sun and leave the solar system. Just because you don’t understand science means it’s aliens. Hahaha what a 🤡
When Oumuamua first noted to have accelerated it was never described as a push away from the sun just as an acceleration that slightly changed its trajectory. The two have nothing in common except they're both in space.
Could it be, that this object was moved by being flung by the sun's gravity the same way that we fling satellites to great distances using the moon 🌙 or a planet? 💫
@@justlittleoldme7283 could be but no one knows how or why it sped up and slightly changed trajectory as no other natural object has done this before.
This man is brilliant! Bravo!
This is Amazing Observation my Prof Avi Loeb!⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️💖💖💖💖💖💖
Rendezvous with Rama
Yup. Rama returns.
Yup!!!
Within the ONENESS
CONSCIOUSNESS
is Within ALL things .
Perhaps this stellar projectory has a element to share with other star systems Energetically.
The simplest of explanations is usually always the right one. And this looks more like a planetary fragment or something similar. As far as the movement the sun interacts with it like it would a solar sail. I am no expert, but not even the experts get things right. So, there is that.
It was. It changed directions
It's that accent. We just gotta believe it
Id really like to hear the full interview. Jimmy church knows his stuff, good interviewer.
So what they should do is go clean up the debris humans left in outer space and the lakes and oceans. May God forgive them for they know not what they do.
He's saying, (1) " no cometary trail" therefore not behaving like a normal comet; (2) pushed by sunlight like the nasa booster which is of small mass relative to surface because it is hallow inside and therefore the object could have been of almost same mass to surface characteristic... or maybe hallow inside...(3) it had a "cherry picking" trajectory... passing by habitable planets likr it was on an observatory mission
Fascinating, makes me wonder so much
Heat turned pockets of frozen water into bursts of propulsion
Did anybody have an ant farm as a kid if so remeber looking at them and wondering what they must be thinking what if we are someone's ants
See the signs my friend god bless him with the wisdom he already has
We are way more complicated ants tho
Good point, hopefully no one has just started heating up a very very large container full of junk aluminium they picked up along the way.
Avi is Awesome
Key words: 'May have been'
Just incredible.
What comes around ...goes around.
Took them that long to remember that oh yeah we built that, there's just no evidence and nobody remembers building it 🤔🤔
Ur slow
I’m in Shock! Thank you for Cleartup all the Questions I has!💖💖💖💖💖💖💖
If I were to build a stealth craft for space travel it would look like a large cylindrical rock…
Or looks like a poorly constipated rendered turd
Ur not an alien, stop putting human centric standards on things that would literally not be human
Now why does it have to be stealthy? For what reason?
@@ManuelMoelle2idk maybe they want to first observe the planets, without having to go through any trouble
❤this man!!!!! He is brilliant☀️
Could be a Red Tesla Roadster
my question is how did they get all this information?
use the internet for more things than youtube and social media and you'd learn
They got big ole glasses and big ole data grabbers
The man's story doesn't add up. The nearest planetary system is 4.5 lights years away. But the rocked booster he is talking about was launched in 1966. That is 56 years compared 4.5 light years.
@@Not_fit_to_be_President ? Why are you talking about another star in the context of this video?
Unadulterated speculation.
The question wasn't "what pushed it" it was. How could it speed up and slightly change its trajectory. What pushed it is your term not the original question of acceleration. Sower of confusion.
I don't know about his answer.
Neil deGrasse Tyson would try to debunk this
He's scared !!
He has ignored actual facts admit some of these incidents just so he can say nope... he just can admit that it's possible just like all the other skeptics
He spoke about it on Stephen Colbert's late night show a few years ago. And said it definitely wasn't an alien ship!!
🤭🤣😂🤣😂that would be fun to listen to his explanation
Mainstream science has been ignoring inconvenient facts for centuries
He is risking his career for coming out with this theory. Physicists are exceptionally brutal when it comes to alien-theories, you’re immediately outcasted and your integrity and intelligence are questioned 😕
It's easier to not hit a planet than to actually hit one, so why does this guy make it sound like that's special.
It is a Ship. A Starship exploring...
Yes.
Who is WE? I’m really starting to think something crazy
To learn more watch Into the Vortex: cs-link.gaia.com/3YfQHhN
😅😅😅😅😂😂😂😂😅😅😅😄😄😂😃
I can't wait to find out what the chaser they're sending after it tells us. This is up there with Planet Nine for mysteries to me.
When did we send a chaser? Thanks!
You'll never get the truth from them; don't hold your breath. All they to is put out lies serially.
the push was caused by something known as the arkroskey force, this has been noticed mainly in and from asteroid belts
A rocket body, super thin, super light. Has nothing similar to an interstellar rock.
The material composition would be very interesting to know.
Both items are the same items. We have sent so many items out into space where else is it suppose to go. These items have been out there since 1966. Man I was born in 1969. We still have a dog to find out there.
Well, I was wondering if the gravitational anomaly that causes us to think there might be another planet could have affected it also.
May have been artificial, and since there's no supporting evidence, the oh so important 'cover up' component can be added to give that argument additional weight with the puberty and under crowd.
X planet has came, changed our magnetic poles and went back
Who said pandemic
It could also be a giants turd that got pushed away from the sun with escaping gasses. My theory is just as good as anyone’s.
Oumuamua looks like a gigantic geoglyph
So, I can then extrapolate that the natural object, if it is natural, and we have no evidence to support an oppositional opinion, must be quite light in mass vs its volume, therefore getting its push from the sun like the artificial rocket with thin walls. Nothing says it must be also be artificial from the given information, although one may choose to argue in either direction with this information alone.
We just do not have enough salient data to venture a guess or conjecture what Oumuamua is.
I could listen to him read me my outstanding bills and love it
So the thing stays in course for hundreds or millions of years just to get casually close to the only planet with life yet know, and by destiny it ejects natural gas, accelerates, changes its course and leaves the solar system just as we happen to detect it... Sure, nothing oddly weird here.. right...
NASA = Never A Straight Answer.....
I think it was a piece of rock that came from a planet that had a totally different polarity of gravity on it that resisted the Sun
You what gets me . Is that all this interplanetary talk of some type of intelligent unknown whatever . If we can send electronic satellite communications devices out of the solar system and they’re so much more advanced. They can send more than a rock I’m sure of it .
NASA 1st successful satellite was the Explorer 1 in 1958. How on earth could we have such capabilities by 1966?
Thats what they told him to say.
I think it was slingshot around the sun not pushed
"Near all the habitable planets"... 👀
There is a great book called 'Rendezvous with Rama" that was about this same thing happening and the world.wide response. Written 50 years or more.
Arthur C. Clarke!
I was thinking exactly that! same type of craft.
Another arthur c clarke book.. also has an unknown spacecraft passing by.
Decived People,,,,,
Nice cover story, very believable. 🤞
Doesn't means it aliens though
Not! It was a natural interstellar asteroid. If it didn't have much or any ice it would not produce a tail of debris. Just because there was no tail that does not mean the photons of the sun did not push it.
Space rock. Read the Fermi paradox
Does this suggest that light is actually affecting mass? Light is, as far as our current understanding of space is concerned, unfiltered in space…dark matter notwithstanding (at least until we have a better grasp on that plausibility)…time for another metaphysical journey. Thanks for the fuel.
but light is definitly affecting mass, for example thats how solar sails work. Photons bounce of a surface, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. what he's saying is that the rocketbooster had alot of surface area with relativly little mass because its hollow. the "comet" also had alot of surface area but its solid so also had alot of mass, so how was it affected so much by the sunlight if it had so much mass. would be easier the explain if it had little mass or was hollow, like a hollow spaceship.
So... its believed to be an scientific & sensor package - interesting!
There is only one habitable planet.
And it came nowhere near us 🤔
Maybe dark energy and through out the galaxy and universe also.
Gravitational pull and gravity out basically energy can unsee but in and out the universe.
So grand of all mass then gravity.
It might have been more than sunlight. It could have been artificial inertia. That would be more interesting especially if it weighed hundreds of tons.
Roger from Mudfossil University channel suggested oumuamua is a Mudfossil giant finger. A colonel from the SSP INTERVIEWED by Linda Moulton Howe said he had boarded it. He said it was 1.5 billion years old and made by the Builder Race.
huh?
Brother is on some incredibly loud pack
I got a bridge in New York for sale...
@@MTyler8787I need some of that. 😂
Sorry douglas, people here dont know about ssp foundation.
Unlikely. We do not know the mass of the object.
There is only one habitable planet in our solar system at present. What do you mean it passed ALL the habitable planets?
It was designed to usher in the end of this planet, if I failed in my unification with creation, for I am the starry host for creation.
There is no gravity without water.
The power to thrust in a different way means that there is an inherent difference in how interstellar objects visiting the 🌎 world.???😂😂😂😂
Something unexpected happens: "It has to be aliens!"
But they're not telling you is it change course twice and had nothing to do with the Sun
Awesome!
What If our universe has like a sort of atmosphere that when it passed through it gained speed due to the impact
Interview Corey Goode. He boarded it
Every scientist that works in this field knows it is a living ship used to sustain life for long distance space travel so they don't need to fuel up and can grow food so they don't starve.
No scientist thinks that hahahaha
Can we have the numbers, including error bars, for the amount of "excess push" on both objects?
It was a rock alrigth.
A.rock.spaceship with intelligent beings in it
It came from interstellar space so how can it be human
You mean to a say ET mothership? Because that’s what it was… and they knew they were being watched from Earth…
Question..can one experience momentum (as when inside a spinning object) in the vacuume of space? If so in what relation as is experienced on earth?
It would not surprise me in the slightest if this were to be an object built by humans during one of the lost ancient civilizations predating Egypt… maybe the pyramids were somehow part of the launch mechanism 🤷♂️ I mean, considering they managed to build the great pyramids before the Egyptians inherited them, I bet they were smart enough to get something to space and to make it orbit the Sun the way this object did, picking up speed gradually over the past 10,000+ years of human history only for it to return and us to find it today floating peacefully yet ominously by as if it’s calling for us, just like the mysteries of the great pyramid and Atlantis… I mean… all of this stuff is in our history of one simply stops listening to mainstream archeologists for a single moment… it’s all right there in the tablets and so on… we have tons of evidence for most of what I mentioned.
They only said it was a rocket booster because they knew they better come up with an excuse before people started asking questions.
Rocket boosters boost the space craft into orbit, then fall back to the earth. That Rocket booster would have traveled light years to reach other habitable planets around other stars. But this "Rocket booster" was launched in 1966. This tale is highly suspect--- it doesn't add up. 🤥
Fact
Doesn’t he sound like his wife and kids are been held hostage?
@@Not_fit_to_be_President what are you talking about… a rocket body was in orbit around are sun (lots are). This person is saying the rock and the body both acted like solar sails.
@@Not_fit_to_be_Presidentyou need to understand english first, he is saying the second object acted like the first object and it was a rocket booster so the first object might be artificial as well. ufuf
But why? If we were an alien species travelling? This is all we would do? Surely we would send drones to each planet and study a bit more
I'm still waiting for one single real picture of any planet, asteroid or satellite in space. Just one.
?
@@gravoc857 If u can't read don't come to the comments.
@@samyrd4654 You’re a dumb loser.
@@gravoc857 funny how you have 0 evidence to prove me wrong but I am the loser 🤣🤣😂 go back to ancient alien brainless tard.
@@samyrd4654 You wreak of NASA denialism you abortion bucket tragedy story.
but if its an alien craft heading towards earth, they wont tell you that
It's using a sail !!😱
We should have sent up a probe. How much time did we have from the time it was detected until it was out of range.?
Yeah right another fabel
That means its hollowed and artificial, meaning someone made it.
Oumaouma far and away gone; now they know what it was. Yeah right .
Does that mean it could come back again? If so, we will all know where to point our phones to get clearer images next time, right?