454 Sequencing

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 143

  • @patches4170
    @patches4170 8 днів тому +2

    My Man always there when needed

  • @Jonathan544200
    @Jonathan544200 7 років тому +1

    Brother, i will be expected to present and explain a machine from a company which i utterly want them to hire me, i decided to present 454 sequencing and this video saved my life. thanks from turkey

  • @MoOnassKA
    @MoOnassKA 7 років тому +2

    You're the best , I can't undersand in my class, and you make things so easy to understand , thank you !

  • @willkerry
    @willkerry 8 років тому +60

    Good video but your explanation of the emulsion PCR step is a bit off. You seem to suggest the strand complementary to the original template (created by extension of the bead oligo) breaking off after denaturation and annealing to another one of the bead oligos. This is not what happens as 1.) this strand is attached to the bead and therefore cannot move and 2.) it wouldn't bind to the bead oligos as it is not complementary, it's identical. Instead, after the first denaturation step it is the original template that breaks off and binds to another bead oligo (as before) and again a complementary strand is created. At the same time, a PCR primer will bind to the 5' end of the first complementary strand (the end away from the bead) and will be extended towards the bead to generate another copy of the original template strand. This process is repeated until the bead is covered in clonally amplified copies of the original template.

    • @DileepKumar-tj9ck
      @DileepKumar-tj9ck 7 років тому

      Thank you, William Kerry.

    • @hashh555
      @hashh555 7 років тому +1

      Was searching for this explanation and couldn't find - indeed makes sense, thank you.

    • @dadsfriendlyrobotcompany
      @dadsfriendlyrobotcompany 7 років тому +1

      I was thinking this exact thing as he was explaining it

    • @Thomaaasooo
      @Thomaaasooo 5 років тому

      @Q Suraiya you are correct

    • @goliathustcg5952
      @goliathustcg5952 4 роки тому +2

      Thanks. I'm wondering: How exactly do you make sure only one DNA sequence lands on a bead, without others landing there at the same time and the bead therefore being incosistant?

  • @oznurmete6685
    @oznurmete6685 8 років тому

    Thank you with my all heart. i watched almost all of your videos. please know there is a person who pray for you :)

  • @rcr8135
    @rcr8135 3 роки тому +3

    Thank you Shomu sir, your way of explaining concepts is excellent.

  • @benda-annevanniekerk6833
    @benda-annevanniekerk6833 8 років тому +2

    Helped me to actually make sense of the textbook, thank you!

  • @dennislin303
    @dennislin303 6 років тому +1

    Very well explained especially for a beginner like myself. Thanks for sharing!

  • @amandinevivet9233
    @amandinevivet9233 2 роки тому +1

    Your video is perfect ! I understood everything, thank you very much :)

  • @tomasvalek381
    @tomasvalek381 2 роки тому +1

    Very nice explanation, I learn a lot. THX

  • @mariamalmahdy6372
    @mariamalmahdy6372 8 років тому

    mashaAllah very nice and helpful explanation thank u so much u r genius really though you look very young , may Allah bless you ... I watch you lectures since last year and thy ve been always a great help to me .. thank you dear

  • @fatimabatool4010
    @fatimabatool4010 8 років тому

    Thank you so much Sir. It helped me so much. The way you explain is so understandable for everyone. Thanks a bunch. God bless you

  • @macplay9765
    @macplay9765 7 років тому +2

    Sir ji you're great ... u provide exactly those material which we want.. hats off.. keep doing it...

  • @PRAVEENDEP
    @PRAVEENDEP 8 років тому +2

    Excellent explanation !! your every lecture's video is so nicely explained, Good to helps other students or researchers ! Good luck for future !! Go ahead....... :)

  • @lenkaobrtancova6949
    @lenkaobrtancova6949 7 років тому +4

    well done prof! thank you for this great explanation :)

  • @isaurasilva4103
    @isaurasilva4103 7 років тому +2

    no hablo ingles pero entiendo mas o menos y usted lo hizo tan sencillo, que comprendí muy bien, muchas gracias :D

  • @botanica19
    @botanica19 Рік тому +1

    Well presented...

  • @assistantprofessor8049
    @assistantprofessor8049 8 років тому +1

    Thank you for informative video but am confused with primer addition at the end. As I know first we use primer with adaptor sequences to make copies of complementary DNA stand by pcr and then run on 454 sequencer. But in your video you explain that we don't need pcr to make copies. Then how we will add primer and adaptor sequence to target dna for sequencing. Please if possible make it more clear for me and please also draw a schematic work flow of this whole process in Sequence from 1 to end. Thank you you did very job for us. GOD BLESS YOU MORE SUCCESS

  • @snehalchavda5738
    @snehalchavda5738 2 роки тому +1

    Very informative

  • @alexstar7995
    @alexstar7995 8 років тому

    Thank you for the indepth explanation, appreciated it.

  • @itzelelizalde4758
    @itzelelizalde4758 8 років тому +1

    Thank you! From México.

  • @ummafatema9534
    @ummafatema9534 8 років тому +1

    Thank you. This video is well understandable. But when the primer is actually added?

    • @fatimabatool4010
      @fatimabatool4010 8 років тому

      Primer is added after loading the beads into wells.

  • @spandanayadav3549
    @spandanayadav3549 6 років тому

    Good vedios sir very informative.but the only problem is with sound please update sound system .thank you

  • @zainabalalwani3170
    @zainabalalwani3170 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent

  • @gurkamalkaur9262
    @gurkamalkaur9262 8 років тому

    You r the best 👍🏻 keep it up

  • @sayansarkar8546
    @sayansarkar8546 4 роки тому

    Plss make a video about emulsion PCR...
    It will be very helpful

  • @radhekrishnamotivationgang6115
    @radhekrishnamotivationgang6115 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much sir

  • @jurgenpenn4624
    @jurgenpenn4624 8 років тому +1

    Great explanation, thanks.

  • @nikmishin9
    @nikmishin9 8 років тому +5

    Hi Shomu, thanks for great video. As far as I understood the method reads nucleotides in order they actually appear on the strand. What I don't understand is how the method prevents the same nucleotides from different parts of the strand from being read all at once. So if we have the following sequence ATTGCAA and we add Thymine we detect just one fluorescence as T bonded to the first A. How does it not bond to the final AA as well?

    • @shantanusingh8267
      @shantanusingh8267 3 роки тому +1

      I also have the same problem. If you got your answer kindly reply.

  • @quentin-v9d
    @quentin-v9d 8 років тому +1

    Hey man, I like your video its helped me out and is very clear. The only bit I'm confused about it the end. So you have all these fragments (I'm assuming there are thousands of fragments) of double stranded DNA composed of the target single strand and the fluorescent single strand from which we derived the target sequence. I don't understand how these fragments are put together into the correct order of the actual full length DNA molecule of whatever we sampled?

  • @coreyman7634
    @coreyman7634 8 років тому

    Thank you, these are great videos!!!

  • @Mechee14
    @Mechee14 8 років тому +4

    hello! i have a question, isn't 454 same as pyrosequencing? becouse here you explain like each nucleotide has a flourescent tag, but pyro uses luciferase....

    • @anjalishukla61
      @anjalishukla61 7 років тому

      Meche Landeira even i have the same question and confused in between pyro and 454

    • @bappisarkar850
      @bappisarkar850 7 років тому

      yahh exactly... please rectify the explanation.

  • @rumeysadgn
    @rumeysadgn 8 років тому

    So many thanks. It is really helpful. :)

  • @ramonmassoni9657
    @ramonmassoni9657 8 років тому

    Awesome bro, you are a genius! One question, is the release of pyorphosphate after each nucleotide is added the way by which the fluorescence is detected?

  • @melissabouzar5273
    @melissabouzar5273 8 років тому

    Thank you! you are saving me !

  • @tetsu6strings
    @tetsu6strings 8 років тому

    Thanks for the great video!

  • @nitinsaxena7370
    @nitinsaxena7370 8 років тому

    Thank you -- very well done!!

  • @monzurmorshed.
    @monzurmorshed. 5 років тому +1

    Thank you!

  • @subhalaxmisahu1886
    @subhalaxmisahu1886 6 років тому +1

    Where is the bead present? Is it in the tube naturally?

  • @muhammedyousafk4115
    @muhammedyousafk4115 2 роки тому +1

    Thankyou sir

  • @believeinyourself7947
    @believeinyourself7947 2 роки тому

    Sor kindly suggest a book for ngs study

  • @juliabl6471
    @juliabl6471 7 років тому

    at minute 5:57 why is it necessary to use adaptor B if it is not useful to fix the DNA to the particle?

  • @leilasaadi5952
    @leilasaadi5952 2 роки тому

    How do we know which dna fragment (on the bead) the light belongs to?

  • @omedhasan6332
    @omedhasan6332 9 років тому +1

    well done brother

  • @omaraalwahab640
    @omaraalwahab640 8 років тому

    Thank u very much 😍

  • @sdfPZXC
    @sdfPZXC 8 років тому

    great explanation, Thanks XD

    • @sdfPZXC
      @sdfPZXC 8 років тому

      would be cool to know how fluorescent was generated.

    • @sdfPZXC
      @sdfPZXC 8 років тому

      oh nevermind it in a pyrosequencing vdo XD

  • @ilariaunali7202
    @ilariaunali7202 8 років тому

    Thank you for your explanation! you're saving me ahah

  • @sportsgaming2548
    @sportsgaming2548 4 роки тому

    Sir is it same as Solid D sequnc?

  • @jurgenstuderegger4972
    @jurgenstuderegger4972 6 років тому +1

    Hey! Thanks for uploading those videos. I'm a bit confused. Is this really the 454 sequencing? 454 is the same as pyrosequencing which uses luciferase, or am I wrong? This video looks like the cycle-sequencing. In any case, thank you!

  • @swapnikasharma7104
    @swapnikasharma7104 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks

  • @128scarface
    @128scarface 9 років тому

    Thanks for the video. So, how do the adapters bind to the dsDNA? is it just a random event?

  • @lukash.8788
    @lukash.8788 2 роки тому

    So it’s basically ion sequencing but instead of protonlevels you just measure the fluorescence?

  • @tanishadas-mu4qi
    @tanishadas-mu4qi Рік тому

    Sir please make a vedio on signature sequences

  • @bruce012324
    @bruce012324 8 років тому

    how is 454 different from pyrosequencing? i notice that 454 uses two adapters while pyro uses one, but isn't using one adapter a lot more easier? whats the advantage of 454 and pyro method?

  • @faiqaatique534
    @faiqaatique534 6 років тому

    Well done

  • @kashafrasul3952
    @kashafrasul3952 4 роки тому

    Kindly give lecture on 3-C, 4-C 5-C, ChIA-PET AND Hi-C TECHNOLOGIES.

  • @jigyasasharma01
    @jigyasasharma01 7 років тому

    ty for saving my xms :)

  • @khatirsafi5079
    @khatirsafi5079 5 років тому

    HI sir i have a question is pyro sequencing and 454 sequencing are same if not ?AND why we use the second beads on the other end of template dna

  • @harshitakashyap2014
    @harshitakashyap2014 3 роки тому

    why it has got the name as "454" sequencing? Is there any significance to this number?

  • @TS-dp2nv
    @TS-dp2nv 8 років тому

    Brilliant!

  • @Drutten87
    @Drutten87 8 років тому

    Thank you! You're the boss

  • @raquelandreaa
    @raquelandreaa 6 років тому +1

    Thank you!!

  • @aishasaleem3738
    @aishasaleem3738 7 років тому +1

    very well explanation sir

  • @johannesmthembu8663
    @johannesmthembu8663 7 років тому

    wait i wanna know something Dr Shomu there is a video that u uploaded by the tittle "pyrosequencing" and this one of "454 sequencing"...is there a difference between pyrosequencing and 454 sequencing since i feel as if what u have explained is the same for both videos ...please help.thank u

  • @IAM-ii4nq
    @IAM-ii4nq 7 років тому

    Thanks Prof

  • @venkataadityaganta1967
    @venkataadityaganta1967 4 роки тому

    what is the special purpose of using bead. Please someone answer and clarify to me that single point.

  • @subhalaxmisahu1886
    @subhalaxmisahu1886 6 років тому +5

    Why it is called as 454 sequencing?

    • @divyanshutiwari9916
      @divyanshutiwari9916 5 років тому +3

      @subhalaxmi sahu
      454 life science is the name of company that has given the technique...thats why it is said so

  • @sumenmajumder9900
    @sumenmajumder9900 8 років тому

    I am confused. How target strand is used as complementary strand in sequencer? I think complementary strand ( produced in beads) is used as complementary strand in sequencer.

  • @simplesimi798
    @simplesimi798 6 років тому +1

    Thank you

  • @umaraziz335
    @umaraziz335 3 роки тому

    hi sir hope you will be fine ,why 454 sequence is called ,454 ????? please explain it.

  • @nailaimtiaz3617
    @nailaimtiaz3617 3 роки тому

    Plz make video for SOLiD sequencing

  • @bszoologest3303
    @bszoologest3303 4 роки тому +1

    sir what is the difference between pyrosequencing and 454 sequencing

  • @4BFF9
    @4BFF9 8 років тому

    perfect, thank you! :)

  • @laul3617
    @laul3617 8 років тому

    Muchas gracias!!

  • @Jajati32
    @Jajati32 5 років тому

    I think above explained method is ABi SOLID sequencing method..Not the 454 sequencing method..

  • @Maitedmm
    @Maitedmm 8 років тому

    THANKS!!

  • @ricardosantanagalego7938
    @ricardosantanagalego7938 7 років тому

    Muito very good

  • @noorajmal62
    @noorajmal62 8 місяців тому

    Why 454 sequence is called 454 sequence??

  • @9804871393
    @9804871393 7 років тому

    as per my knowledge 454 and pyro are same sequencing method.

  • @ReplicatedMirror
    @ReplicatedMirror 3 роки тому

    I am a little bit confused that which strand was going where and which was target strand. Just messy man...
    please, make another clear concept video,please.

  • @vancewade6251
    @vancewade6251 8 років тому

    I'm curious to know how the machine inputs one type of dNTP at a time and then washes it and adds the next one so damn quickly

  • @abhijitpaul8509
    @abhijitpaul8509 6 років тому +1

    why it is called 454 sequence?

    • @rishianand100
      @rishianand100 5 років тому

      454 is the name of the company now called Roche/454

  • @lollsazz
    @lollsazz 8 років тому +20

    Only ONE fragmentof DNA is caught per bead - otherwise this wouldn't make sense

  • @saraha6980
    @saraha6980 3 роки тому

    Thank you very much for helping me in every single exam (✦థ ェ థ)

  • @omedhasan6332
    @omedhasan6332 9 років тому +2

    really i love you

  • @dc33333
    @dc33333 6 років тому

    Video not accurate.The statement there is no PCR is not correct; emulsion PCR. Other inaccuracies as noted below

  • @siriveludharani6338
    @siriveludharani6338 3 роки тому

    🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @fahlihamza7937
    @fahlihamza7937 8 років тому

    send

  • @johnydangi8599
    @johnydangi8599 9 років тому

    must h....

  • @akankshabharti7013
    @akankshabharti7013 7 років тому

    confusing

  • @leonardomohamed5512
    @leonardomohamed5512 8 років тому

    You have been more celar thad mi

  • @joshuaspall
    @joshuaspall 7 років тому

    dude go inside