Introducing Gigabot 4 & Terabot 4! Technical Overview

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 сер 2024
  • Gigabot 4 and Terabot 4 are large-format industrial FFF 3D printers that manufacture human-scale objects from filament with a build volume up to 30x larger than desktop 3D printers.
    For more info on re:3D 3D printers, visit: re3d.org/gigabot/
    Table of Contents:
    00:00 Intro
    00:14 Build Volume
    00:35 Build Quality
    01:44 Printer Bed Specs
    02:31 Motors & Movement
    03:10 Dual Extruder System
    04:00 Filament Print Materials
    04:49 Klipper Interface & Touchscreen
    05:52 ArchiMajor Control Board & Electrical System
    07:05 Printer Enclosure
    07:21 Gigabot 4 Kit
    07:37 Simplify3D Slicer
    08:06 Warranty and Support
    08:56 Dream Big. Print HUGE
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @re3Dprinting
    @re3Dprinting  Рік тому

    Metric build volumes of Gigabot 4 3D printers are:
    Gigabot 4 - 590 x 600 x 600 mm
    Gigabot 4 XLT - 590 x 760 x 900 mm
    Terabot 4 - 915 x 915 x 1000 mm

  • @fireblade639
    @fireblade639 Рік тому +4

    How do you get .005" with plastic rollers linear slides???

    • @re3Dprinting
      @re3Dprinting  Рік тому

      We machine our metal parts to tolerances of 0.005". 3D prints are accurate to within 0.005”/0.1mm up to 6”/152mm. Beyond that, within 0.001”/0.025mm per 1”/25mm.

    • @fireblade639
      @fireblade639 Рік тому +1

      @@re3Dprinting that's amaizing, most of the Time roller slides try to overcome rail itself tollerances out of spec, this kind of machine Is sent fully assembled and tested???

    • @re3Dprinting
      @re3Dprinting  Рік тому

      ​@@fireblade639 thank you, and yes it is sent fully assembled, tested and calibrated.

  • @Tedlasman
    @Tedlasman Рік тому +2

    Hello, do you sell the control board separately?

    • @re3Dprinting
      @re3Dprinting  Рік тому

      Hello! We do not currently due to supply chain constraints.

  • @waqastahir9596
    @waqastahir9596 10 місяців тому

    Price???

  • @jjptech
    @jjptech Рік тому +3

    This looks very uneficient