HMS Prince of Wales Arrives

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 165

  • @faisonhoward9191
    @faisonhoward9191 4 роки тому +8

    Beautiful ship..from America to our English cousins..safe horizons my friends..

  • @adamsmohammed3780
    @adamsmohammed3780 5 років тому +24

    Wow God Bless Prince Of Wales and all he Crewmembers.

  • @billbaynes3432
    @billbaynes3432 5 років тому +6

    The good thing about this video where other video makers go wrong is there is no music! Making it superb! So thank you for no music! It’s enough hearing the sea gulls and natural sounds around! The odd tugboat hooting away et al !

  • @charleshart6992
    @charleshart6992 5 років тому +17

    What a magnificent sight!

  • @suedesbois1203
    @suedesbois1203 5 років тому +2

    Thanks for the wonderful coverage

  • @jesseholmes3206
    @jesseholmes3206 5 років тому +15

    U.K. and the USA partners in peace, brothers in arms. Lets see that we never fight each other again.

    • @sharkamov
      @sharkamov 3 роки тому +1

      ** Both are rogue states, both elevates themselves above what is de facto international law.

    • @-M0LE
      @-M0LE 2 роки тому

      Partners in peace are you joking
      Usa has killed more humans than any other country in history and uk is usa lil btch
      Nato has been killing in Yugoslavia and Ukraine foe a long time

    • @-M0LE
      @-M0LE 2 роки тому

      @@sharkamov 👍

  • @DrawnInk1
    @DrawnInk1 5 років тому +6

    Can't wait to see them together.

    • @trevorstewart369
      @trevorstewart369 5 років тому +1

      What a pity the SNP want to break up this great union.

  • @newt7705
    @newt7705 5 років тому +29

    the trouble is we have to much uncontrolled immigration putting a great strain on the NHS, housing, schools, control that and we could have another two carriers.

    • @aquillandscroll6428
      @aquillandscroll6428 5 років тому +1

      new t flawed argument.The population increase is declining.Smaller population means less military personnel to man the ships if our forces expand.
      Of course,a sudden increase will result in a strain on NHS,but housing is mainly an issue due to foreign companies being able to buy properties and monopolise them to bring up the prices even more from the increase due to financial crisis.
      Moreover,the strain may very well be alleviated after few years as Asian families are strict about children getting high prestige jobs;such as Engineer,Doctor or architect.
      On the other hand,yes they do take up resources in the form of benefits,but if we complain about them being useless;how’s that any different from Liverpool facing same problem.
      Uncontrolled immigration?I agree partly with you,the matter of fact is;Sure we bring in people of x group,in x group there are a group of people with strong beliefs.Ofcourse,only cause of those people,we can’t blame x group fully.There’s also y group who have no permanent homes and travel and some steal.Then there’s z group from eastern european country beginning with A that also have some people bringing in drugs.
      All in all,many of those groups coming in have troublemakers,x group is not the sole group that contributes.
      Furthermore,by your same argument,we should get rid of the bagpipe blowers cause even though they are a smaller population in proportion;they still take much of the annual budget.
      Yes,you say control those aspects;I fully agree with you,we need more control,and I think we are starting to do that.It’s too late to kick out all that came in,including me;but we can correct it and also correct the issues domestically with many other cities facing same problem from natives.

    • @markbrown351
      @markbrown351 5 років тому +6

      @@aquillandscroll6428 the population growth may have slowed!! but decreasing it is not! www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/articles/overviewoftheukpopulation/august2019&ved=2ahUKEwihmsjwrPPlAhWQVxUIHcpBAEkQFjACegQIDxAN&usg=AOvVaw2myrFkWAPuiqjQFH0Pfbh3

    • @Aubury
      @Aubury 5 років тому

      new t ..the two we have is squeezing the defence budget enough. The emigration of lolly to off shore accounts, and multi national company’s tax avoidance. The crisis of 2008 is still with us. With Brexit and climate heating, interesting times.

    • @wakkadakkaify
      @wakkadakkaify 5 років тому +1

      we can control it. EU countries do it, but we don't. It's the govt's decision.

    • @markbrown351
      @markbrown351 5 років тому

      @@wakkadakkaify really what other EU countries control it??

  • @michaeloconnell8779
    @michaeloconnell8779 5 років тому +12

    Way to go Britain!!!!!!!!!

  • @christineknowelden5336
    @christineknowelden5336 5 років тому +16

    Fantastic - wish I had been there to see it.

  • @eddo167
    @eddo167 5 років тому +41

    very pleased to see my tax has been put to good use, lots of people employed by this contract.

    • @brentsummers7377
      @brentsummers7377 5 років тому

      As would quite a few far more useful frigates and destroyers (hopefully without Rolls Royce marine engines.. )

    • @daveboydell2896
      @daveboydell2896 5 років тому +2

      Good use my God give your head a shake!

    • @Radictor44
      @Radictor44 4 роки тому

      Yep, another 1 would be nice :D

    • @-M0LE
      @-M0LE 2 роки тому

      Good use
      Wouldn’t it be better spent on hospitals and homeless
      Not a machine of killing

  • @siuwahkeung7500
    @siuwahkeung7500 5 років тому +11

    Salute to Royal Navy !

    • @Midlandcapo
      @Midlandcapo 5 років тому +2

      Malvinas Argentinas ayer hoy y siempre... piratas go House...

  • @heathercunningham3040
    @heathercunningham3040 2 роки тому

    Proud of our Royal Navy, well all our military who put their lives on the line. My grandad was in the Royal Navy in WW1.

    • @-M0LE
      @-M0LE 2 роки тому

      Brainwashed

  • @DavidMarfe
    @DavidMarfe 5 років тому +2

    Now when’s the third one coming

    • @ThePalaeontologist
      @ThePalaeontologist 5 років тому +1

      If only it were....and call it HMS Ark Royal [R10]

  • @isleofwightwebcams2976
    @isleofwightwebcams2976  5 років тому

    With nearly 180,000 views it's clear this has been our most popular video ever. We need 1000 subscribers to allow us to go live on this channel so if you can share away it would help. Thank you. If you would like to watch our cameras live 24/7 please go to www.isleofwightwebcams.co.uk

  • @Bobo56Bear
    @Bobo56Bear 5 років тому +1

    Would like to see Commonwealth develop its own Strike Aircraft instead of overpriced JSF F35 (with Bulk of $ going to US), when they need replacement. Hopefully carriers have compliment of Advanced Combat drones on-board or in development aswell, most likely already in the works and Top Secret :)

    • @cameronninawale9610
      @cameronninawale9610 5 років тому +2

      Yes, indeed. One would think the combined intellect of Australians, New Zealanders, Canadians and the British drawing on resources from Commonwealth nations could come up with a Commonwealth designs...not to mention the economic spin-offs that are usually a bonus for nations participating in such projects.

    • @BroonParker
      @BroonParker 2 роки тому

      @@cameronninawale9610 not if the USA have anythingbto do with it. We're their colonies now.

  • @scottwalker2003
    @scottwalker2003 5 років тому +6

    Good to see another well built SCOTTISH product

    • @brentsummers7377
      @brentsummers7377 5 років тому

      I imagine the Scottish shipyards would have been able to build some really good destroyers and frigates for the same cost.

    • @scottwalker2003
      @scottwalker2003 5 років тому

      @@brentsummers7377 we would have if a certain government dudnt pull the the plug on the contract

    • @MrRQBQ
      @MrRQBQ 5 років тому +3

      Scott Walker. It's not an exclusively Scottish product. Most of it was built elsewhere, including its home port of Portsmouth, and assembled in Scotland.

    • @scottwalker2003
      @scottwalker2003 5 років тому

      @@MrRQBQ most of it was built on the clyde

    • @MrRQBQ
      @MrRQBQ 5 років тому +3

      @@scottwalker2003 Direct quote from Wikipedia. "HMS Prince of Wales was assembled at Rosyth from 52 blocks built by six shipyards around the UK" Portsmouth wanted and had the facilities and capability to assemble these ships but, for political reasons, the contract was awarded to Rosyth. I think it was the right decision but please don't try and claim it was an exclusively Scottish project.

  • @davidthompson882
    @davidthompson882 3 роки тому

    When you look out you window and see a small town sailing by

  • @anthonycrofts9895
    @anthonycrofts9895 6 місяців тому

    A g;orified helicopter carrier- not a jet fighter to be seen.-basically we dont have more than a few us jets and reuqire massive enlistment in crews for our ships.Its to be hope that the Isle of Man dont have conflict with us

  • @mightvedroppedjury5324
    @mightvedroppedjury5324 5 років тому

    Why is it not armed with aa Defense as soon as it hits the water

    • @mightvedroppedjury5324
      @mightvedroppedjury5324 5 років тому

      Brett Mitchell no it should have aa Defense as it does now but not when it was launched on sea trails

    • @cameronninawale9610
      @cameronninawale9610 5 років тому

      Maybe the lack of AA defense is a historical tribute to its World War 2 namesake. Anyway, I'm sure there'll be CIWS fitted around the flight deck in due course.

    • @BigBoomOfDoom2
      @BigBoomOfDoom2 5 років тому

      Because it always has a capable escort.

  • @MajorRoadAhead
    @MajorRoadAhead 5 років тому +8

    Thank God the ship isn't named H.M.S. Prince Andrew !!!

    • @lassemanninen4750
      @lassemanninen4750 5 років тому +1

      Well..... one day you will have "HMS That biatzh from USA".

    • @Then.72
      @Then.72 4 роки тому +1

      Robin Seward Thank god The New Ford class isn’t called the USS Jeffrey Epstein

    • @-M0LE
      @-M0LE 2 роки тому

      Do you know Prince Charles abused little boys in the palace and it was covered up
      Your naive

  • @patrickli3576
    @patrickli3576 5 років тому +2

    Arrived??? It can move????

  • @jonathanpardoe8722
    @jonathanpardoe8722 2 роки тому

    And now at the very time that we need our £3bn supercarrier, its stuck out of the water in a Scottish dry dock being surveyed for the catastrophic damage to its underwater gear ......Great ! Whether it can be repaired satisfactorily to ever go to sea again remains to be seen . I have my doubts as the relatively flimsy exposed rudders props and shafts have in this case been totaly overlooked during the build . I reckon , she has clobbered her starboard shaft by hitting an underwater obstacle that has shook the ship to bits as if the propellor became horribly out of balance , it would have the corresponding damage right up to the gearbox and engine which would have been revolving at speed and thereby shaking the whole engine assembly, and drive train , not to mention the ships main frames and bearing housings , all of which might never be able to be straightened , certainly not enough to go to war in .

  • @colinamwilliamson
    @colinamwilliamson 5 років тому

    Papa Romeo Juliet, plus an unknown pennant. What does that mean?

  • @sontruong2052
    @sontruong2052 4 роки тому

    Rất tuyệt vời 👍

  • @jayamatithapagahamagar6069
    @jayamatithapagahamagar6069 5 років тому

    Maha Maitriya Mangalam!!!

  • @princessmiriam6911
    @princessmiriam6911 5 років тому

    Fallen day Prince of Wales original was Commander Space Aircraft Atlantis... bloody story To England soldiers today

  • @larrybird11382
    @larrybird11382 5 років тому

    But she is not for fight .she is for sale

  • @Leon-lt5gv
    @Leon-lt5gv 8 місяців тому

    What 🇬🇧 !!! has it broke down again 🤣 strange thing is ' nobody seems to know ' most of its new parts ' have to be made by EU 🇪🇺🤔

  • @michalgabor5429
    @michalgabor5429 10 місяців тому

    Is it true the government self to Australia Prince of Wales does the biggest mistake if that's true we need more ship like this minimum two more I don't think so government gonna sell this aircraft to Australia maybe that built new aircraft

  • @juanangelalonsoruiz8839
    @juanangelalonsoruiz8839 11 місяців тому

    Mucha chicha pero poca limonada

  • @alknowsgofra5319
    @alknowsgofra5319 5 років тому

    А зачем этой каракатицы две надстройки

    • @Bobo56Bear
      @Bobo56Bear 5 років тому

      One Navigation Captains Bridge etc...Other is Air-Command :) Keep the two separate and disciplined, in times of Warfare etc, good idea. See the Thales Radar systems upfront etc, will know when the Ruskies etc are coming from 1500 miles away or more :)

  • @merpmeeseeks135
    @merpmeeseeks135 5 років тому +1

    Already got rust... Id ask for a refund

    • @disceva6443
      @disceva6443 5 років тому

      All naval ships rust. Take a look at the US carriers, those things have tons of rust.

    • @pannenkoekspek
      @pannenkoekspek 5 років тому

      Don't be so salty.

    • @Then.72
      @Then.72 4 роки тому

      merp meeseeks anchor chain

  • @kyxvwx
    @kyxvwx 5 років тому +2

    総理大臣、この次総理候補、河野防衛大臣が適任だ。まず国際的に英語が出来て世界の対応が出来る。もう少し仲間を作る事が大事。一人では駄目です。後はいない。

  • @gabrielcortes5638
    @gabrielcortes5638 5 років тому

    and the A4 Charly..... 30-05-1982

    • @lobito3365
      @lobito3365 5 років тому

      Y siguen con el mito. Es patético que a esta altura sigan insistiendo con lo del Invencible, buque que salio incólume de cualquier seudo ataque argentino.

  • @สุวัฒน์ต.วรพานิช-จ8ฎ

    Unable to maintain it's army force to 65000 men yet dole out two aircraft carriers, what an empire?

    • @BigBoomOfDoom2
      @BigBoomOfDoom2 5 років тому +1

      It's not an empire. The overseas territories are an historical technicality at this point. Britain isn't trying to be an empire, that's long in the past.
      Britain is an Island nation, hence it's primary military concern which is defence, should focus on navy and then air force, then finally army. I do agree that the army needs more support though. Hopefully in time.

    • @cyanoticspore676
      @cyanoticspore676 4 роки тому

      Bud you need to check up on your history, the British empire ended 200 years ago. All we have now is the UK and the Falkland and channel Islands.

    • @BigBoomOfDoom2
      @BigBoomOfDoom2 4 роки тому

      @@cyanoticspore676 Your sentiment is correct but I think that it's fair to say that the empire effectively died around WW2.
      There are also several overseas territories and other similar things. Check out this page, you'll find it interesting. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Overseas_Territories

    • @bulletproofguy5112
      @bulletproofguy5112 4 роки тому

      @@cyanoticspore676 actually Britain has Gibraltar, Ascension Island in the Atlantic, a handful of caribean islands and the Cayman Islands and we own Bermuda, Britan also has the falklnds, Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean and a few islands in the Pacific aswell as 4% of cyprus are british millitary bases. Britan Also has a huge antarctic territory that’s 8x the size of Britain..

    • @bulletproofguy5112
      @bulletproofguy5112 4 роки тому

      Actually Britain has a reduced army because we don’t need it but we have 112,000 including reservists, and 200,000 se nod reservists in times of war. We also have 9,000 royal marine commandos.

  • @JanKowalski-ip2kb
    @JanKowalski-ip2kb 5 років тому

    Lol... Nice gadget

    • @Radictor44
      @Radictor44 4 роки тому

      We call it the iCarrier Pro 12

  • @ArmandoHernandez-qc9rg
    @ArmandoHernandez-qc9rg 5 років тому

    no tienen para tragar pero presumiendo portaaviones ,para tenerlos anclados.

  • @dennismorgan7297
    @dennismorgan7297 2 роки тому

    Need aressting wires as it can take most of nato planes as it is the NATO flgship

  • @joelozzy9083
    @joelozzy9083 5 років тому +5

    What a complete waste of money this and the other carrier is at £3bn each!! At a time when food banks in the UK are used by 5% of the population and the NHS doesn’t have enough beds we squander ridiculous amounts of money. The government needs to do the right thing and sell these to some other country who can afford such luxuries.

    • @seniorslaphead8336
      @seniorslaphead8336 5 років тому +27

      Were you dropped on your head as a child? The only reason you get to enjoy your privilages as a member of the UK is because we have the means to defend our democracy.

    • @garrethshaw9305
      @garrethshaw9305 5 років тому +4

      Ill not mention the £6,693,782,112 on top of this for 72 F-35's to fully fit out both of them, cos that'll really ruin your day.

    • @dansmith1045
      @dansmith1045 5 років тому +11

      I’m all for these ships they look great.

    • @waynemorris4059
      @waynemorris4059 5 років тому +6

      These ships do so much around the world . From protecting out subs that keep Russia in check . Deploy missiles to areas that are to hostile for soldiers.. not to mention humanitarian aid missions .. but I guess the cost is to much to keep people protected and save lives

    • @vansolo9794
      @vansolo9794 5 років тому +13

      @ Joel osgood You are entitled to an opinion of course...but you are still a moron!