The good thing about this video where other video makers go wrong is there is no music! Making it superb! So thank you for no music! It’s enough hearing the sea gulls and natural sounds around! The odd tugboat hooting away et al !
Partners in peace are you joking Usa has killed more humans than any other country in history and uk is usa lil btch Nato has been killing in Yugoslavia and Ukraine foe a long time
the trouble is we have to much uncontrolled immigration putting a great strain on the NHS, housing, schools, control that and we could have another two carriers.
new t flawed argument.The population increase is declining.Smaller population means less military personnel to man the ships if our forces expand. Of course,a sudden increase will result in a strain on NHS,but housing is mainly an issue due to foreign companies being able to buy properties and monopolise them to bring up the prices even more from the increase due to financial crisis. Moreover,the strain may very well be alleviated after few years as Asian families are strict about children getting high prestige jobs;such as Engineer,Doctor or architect. On the other hand,yes they do take up resources in the form of benefits,but if we complain about them being useless;how’s that any different from Liverpool facing same problem. Uncontrolled immigration?I agree partly with you,the matter of fact is;Sure we bring in people of x group,in x group there are a group of people with strong beliefs.Ofcourse,only cause of those people,we can’t blame x group fully.There’s also y group who have no permanent homes and travel and some steal.Then there’s z group from eastern european country beginning with A that also have some people bringing in drugs. All in all,many of those groups coming in have troublemakers,x group is not the sole group that contributes. Furthermore,by your same argument,we should get rid of the bagpipe blowers cause even though they are a smaller population in proportion;they still take much of the annual budget. Yes,you say control those aspects;I fully agree with you,we need more control,and I think we are starting to do that.It’s too late to kick out all that came in,including me;but we can correct it and also correct the issues domestically with many other cities facing same problem from natives.
@@aquillandscroll6428 the population growth may have slowed!! but decreasing it is not! www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/articles/overviewoftheukpopulation/august2019&ved=2ahUKEwihmsjwrPPlAhWQVxUIHcpBAEkQFjACegQIDxAN&usg=AOvVaw2myrFkWAPuiqjQFH0Pfbh3
new t ..the two we have is squeezing the defence budget enough. The emigration of lolly to off shore accounts, and multi national company’s tax avoidance. The crisis of 2008 is still with us. With Brexit and climate heating, interesting times.
With nearly 180,000 views it's clear this has been our most popular video ever. We need 1000 subscribers to allow us to go live on this channel so if you can share away it would help. Thank you. If you would like to watch our cameras live 24/7 please go to www.isleofwightwebcams.co.uk
Would like to see Commonwealth develop its own Strike Aircraft instead of overpriced JSF F35 (with Bulk of $ going to US), when they need replacement. Hopefully carriers have compliment of Advanced Combat drones on-board or in development aswell, most likely already in the works and Top Secret :)
Yes, indeed. One would think the combined intellect of Australians, New Zealanders, Canadians and the British drawing on resources from Commonwealth nations could come up with a Commonwealth designs...not to mention the economic spin-offs that are usually a bonus for nations participating in such projects.
Scott Walker. It's not an exclusively Scottish product. Most of it was built elsewhere, including its home port of Portsmouth, and assembled in Scotland.
@@scottwalker2003 Direct quote from Wikipedia. "HMS Prince of Wales was assembled at Rosyth from 52 blocks built by six shipyards around the UK" Portsmouth wanted and had the facilities and capability to assemble these ships but, for political reasons, the contract was awarded to Rosyth. I think it was the right decision but please don't try and claim it was an exclusively Scottish project.
And now at the very time that we need our £3bn supercarrier, its stuck out of the water in a Scottish dry dock being surveyed for the catastrophic damage to its underwater gear ......Great ! Whether it can be repaired satisfactorily to ever go to sea again remains to be seen . I have my doubts as the relatively flimsy exposed rudders props and shafts have in this case been totaly overlooked during the build . I reckon , she has clobbered her starboard shaft by hitting an underwater obstacle that has shook the ship to bits as if the propellor became horribly out of balance , it would have the corresponding damage right up to the gearbox and engine which would have been revolving at speed and thereby shaking the whole engine assembly, and drive train , not to mention the ships main frames and bearing housings , all of which might never be able to be straightened , certainly not enough to go to war in .
A g;orified helicopter carrier- not a jet fighter to be seen.-basically we dont have more than a few us jets and reuqire massive enlistment in crews for our ships.Its to be hope that the Isle of Man dont have conflict with us
Maybe the lack of AA defense is a historical tribute to its World War 2 namesake. Anyway, I'm sure there'll be CIWS fitted around the flight deck in due course.
Is it true the government self to Australia Prince of Wales does the biggest mistake if that's true we need more ship like this minimum two more I don't think so government gonna sell this aircraft to Australia maybe that built new aircraft
Y siguen con el mito. Es patético que a esta altura sigan insistiendo con lo del Invencible, buque que salio incólume de cualquier seudo ataque argentino.
One Navigation Captains Bridge etc...Other is Air-Command :) Keep the two separate and disciplined, in times of Warfare etc, good idea. See the Thales Radar systems upfront etc, will know when the Ruskies etc are coming from 1500 miles away or more :)
It's not an empire. The overseas territories are an historical technicality at this point. Britain isn't trying to be an empire, that's long in the past. Britain is an Island nation, hence it's primary military concern which is defence, should focus on navy and then air force, then finally army. I do agree that the army needs more support though. Hopefully in time.
@@cyanoticspore676 Your sentiment is correct but I think that it's fair to say that the empire effectively died around WW2. There are also several overseas territories and other similar things. Check out this page, you'll find it interesting. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Overseas_Territories
@@cyanoticspore676 actually Britain has Gibraltar, Ascension Island in the Atlantic, a handful of caribean islands and the Cayman Islands and we own Bermuda, Britan also has the falklnds, Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean and a few islands in the Pacific aswell as 4% of cyprus are british millitary bases. Britan Also has a huge antarctic territory that’s 8x the size of Britain..
Actually Britain has a reduced army because we don’t need it but we have 112,000 including reservists, and 200,000 se nod reservists in times of war. We also have 9,000 royal marine commandos.
What a complete waste of money this and the other carrier is at £3bn each!! At a time when food banks in the UK are used by 5% of the population and the NHS doesn’t have enough beds we squander ridiculous amounts of money. The government needs to do the right thing and sell these to some other country who can afford such luxuries.
Were you dropped on your head as a child? The only reason you get to enjoy your privilages as a member of the UK is because we have the means to defend our democracy.
These ships do so much around the world . From protecting out subs that keep Russia in check . Deploy missiles to areas that are to hostile for soldiers.. not to mention humanitarian aid missions .. but I guess the cost is to much to keep people protected and save lives
Beautiful ship..from America to our English cousins..safe horizons my friends..
The good thing about this video where other video makers go wrong is there is no music! Making it superb! So thank you for no music! It’s enough hearing the sea gulls and natural sounds around! The odd tugboat hooting away et al !
Wow God Bless Prince Of Wales and all he Crewmembers.
U.K. and the USA partners in peace, brothers in arms. Lets see that we never fight each other again.
** Both are rogue states, both elevates themselves above what is de facto international law.
Partners in peace are you joking
Usa has killed more humans than any other country in history and uk is usa lil btch
Nato has been killing in Yugoslavia and Ukraine foe a long time
@@sharkamov 👍
What a magnificent sight!
PAPUA
PAPUA
I thought monstrous rather than magnificent, but I get what you mean. Shock and awe, I guess.
Way to go Britain!!!!!!!!!
Can't wait to see them together.
What a pity the SNP want to break up this great union.
Salute to Royal Navy !
Malvinas Argentinas ayer hoy y siempre... piratas go House...
very pleased to see my tax has been put to good use, lots of people employed by this contract.
As would quite a few far more useful frigates and destroyers (hopefully without Rolls Royce marine engines.. )
Good use my God give your head a shake!
Yep, another 1 would be nice :D
Good use
Wouldn’t it be better spent on hospitals and homeless
Not a machine of killing
Fantastic - wish I had been there to see it.
Christine Knowelden mm mí
Thanks for the wonderful coverage
the trouble is we have to much uncontrolled immigration putting a great strain on the NHS, housing, schools, control that and we could have another two carriers.
new t flawed argument.The population increase is declining.Smaller population means less military personnel to man the ships if our forces expand.
Of course,a sudden increase will result in a strain on NHS,but housing is mainly an issue due to foreign companies being able to buy properties and monopolise them to bring up the prices even more from the increase due to financial crisis.
Moreover,the strain may very well be alleviated after few years as Asian families are strict about children getting high prestige jobs;such as Engineer,Doctor or architect.
On the other hand,yes they do take up resources in the form of benefits,but if we complain about them being useless;how’s that any different from Liverpool facing same problem.
Uncontrolled immigration?I agree partly with you,the matter of fact is;Sure we bring in people of x group,in x group there are a group of people with strong beliefs.Ofcourse,only cause of those people,we can’t blame x group fully.There’s also y group who have no permanent homes and travel and some steal.Then there’s z group from eastern european country beginning with A that also have some people bringing in drugs.
All in all,many of those groups coming in have troublemakers,x group is not the sole group that contributes.
Furthermore,by your same argument,we should get rid of the bagpipe blowers cause even though they are a smaller population in proportion;they still take much of the annual budget.
Yes,you say control those aspects;I fully agree with you,we need more control,and I think we are starting to do that.It’s too late to kick out all that came in,including me;but we can correct it and also correct the issues domestically with many other cities facing same problem from natives.
@@aquillandscroll6428 the population growth may have slowed!! but decreasing it is not! www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/articles/overviewoftheukpopulation/august2019&ved=2ahUKEwihmsjwrPPlAhWQVxUIHcpBAEkQFjACegQIDxAN&usg=AOvVaw2myrFkWAPuiqjQFH0Pfbh3
new t ..the two we have is squeezing the defence budget enough. The emigration of lolly to off shore accounts, and multi national company’s tax avoidance. The crisis of 2008 is still with us. With Brexit and climate heating, interesting times.
we can control it. EU countries do it, but we don't. It's the govt's decision.
@@wakkadakkaify really what other EU countries control it??
Proud of our Royal Navy, well all our military who put their lives on the line. My grandad was in the Royal Navy in WW1.
Brainwashed
With nearly 180,000 views it's clear this has been our most popular video ever. We need 1000 subscribers to allow us to go live on this channel so if you can share away it would help. Thank you. If you would like to watch our cameras live 24/7 please go to www.isleofwightwebcams.co.uk
When you look out you window and see a small town sailing by
Would like to see Commonwealth develop its own Strike Aircraft instead of overpriced JSF F35 (with Bulk of $ going to US), when they need replacement. Hopefully carriers have compliment of Advanced Combat drones on-board or in development aswell, most likely already in the works and Top Secret :)
Yes, indeed. One would think the combined intellect of Australians, New Zealanders, Canadians and the British drawing on resources from Commonwealth nations could come up with a Commonwealth designs...not to mention the economic spin-offs that are usually a bonus for nations participating in such projects.
@@cameronninawale9610 not if the USA have anythingbto do with it. We're their colonies now.
Good to see another well built SCOTTISH product
I imagine the Scottish shipyards would have been able to build some really good destroyers and frigates for the same cost.
@@brentsummers7377 we would have if a certain government dudnt pull the the plug on the contract
Scott Walker. It's not an exclusively Scottish product. Most of it was built elsewhere, including its home port of Portsmouth, and assembled in Scotland.
@@MrRQBQ most of it was built on the clyde
@@scottwalker2003 Direct quote from Wikipedia. "HMS Prince of Wales was assembled at Rosyth from 52 blocks built by six shipyards around the UK" Portsmouth wanted and had the facilities and capability to assemble these ships but, for political reasons, the contract was awarded to Rosyth. I think it was the right decision but please don't try and claim it was an exclusively Scottish project.
Thank God the ship isn't named H.M.S. Prince Andrew !!!
Well..... one day you will have "HMS That biatzh from USA".
Robin Seward Thank god The New Ford class isn’t called the USS Jeffrey Epstein
Do you know Prince Charles abused little boys in the palace and it was covered up
Your naive
Now when’s the third one coming
If only it were....and call it HMS Ark Royal [R10]
And now at the very time that we need our £3bn supercarrier, its stuck out of the water in a Scottish dry dock being surveyed for the catastrophic damage to its underwater gear ......Great ! Whether it can be repaired satisfactorily to ever go to sea again remains to be seen . I have my doubts as the relatively flimsy exposed rudders props and shafts have in this case been totaly overlooked during the build . I reckon , she has clobbered her starboard shaft by hitting an underwater obstacle that has shook the ship to bits as if the propellor became horribly out of balance , it would have the corresponding damage right up to the gearbox and engine which would have been revolving at speed and thereby shaking the whole engine assembly, and drive train , not to mention the ships main frames and bearing housings , all of which might never be able to be straightened , certainly not enough to go to war in .
A g;orified helicopter carrier- not a jet fighter to be seen.-basically we dont have more than a few us jets and reuqire massive enlistment in crews for our ships.Its to be hope that the Isle of Man dont have conflict with us
Arrived??? It can move????
Rất tuyệt vời 👍
Fallen day Prince of Wales original was Commander Space Aircraft Atlantis... bloody story To England soldiers today
Mucha chicha pero poca limonada
Papa Romeo Juliet, plus an unknown pennant. What does that mean?
Maha Maitriya Mangalam!!!
But she is not for fight .she is for sale
Why is it not armed with aa Defense as soon as it hits the water
Brett Mitchell no it should have aa Defense as it does now but not when it was launched on sea trails
Maybe the lack of AA defense is a historical tribute to its World War 2 namesake. Anyway, I'm sure there'll be CIWS fitted around the flight deck in due course.
Because it always has a capable escort.
What 🇬🇧 !!! has it broke down again 🤣 strange thing is ' nobody seems to know ' most of its new parts ' have to be made by EU 🇪🇺🤔
Is it true the government self to Australia Prince of Wales does the biggest mistake if that's true we need more ship like this minimum two more I don't think so government gonna sell this aircraft to Australia maybe that built new aircraft
Already got rust... Id ask for a refund
All naval ships rust. Take a look at the US carriers, those things have tons of rust.
Don't be so salty.
merp meeseeks anchor chain
and the A4 Charly..... 30-05-1982
Y siguen con el mito. Es patético que a esta altura sigan insistiendo con lo del Invencible, buque que salio incólume de cualquier seudo ataque argentino.
А зачем этой каракатицы две надстройки
One Navigation Captains Bridge etc...Other is Air-Command :) Keep the two separate and disciplined, in times of Warfare etc, good idea. See the Thales Radar systems upfront etc, will know when the Ruskies etc are coming from 1500 miles away or more :)
Lol... Nice gadget
We call it the iCarrier Pro 12
総理大臣、この次総理候補、河野防衛大臣が適任だ。まず国際的に英語が出来て世界の対応が出来る。もう少し仲間を作る事が大事。一人では駄目です。後はいない。
Rule Britania
What does this Chinese propagandist say?
@@adamjacob5369 It's Japanese
no tienen para tragar pero presumiendo portaaviones ,para tenerlos anclados.
Unable to maintain it's army force to 65000 men yet dole out two aircraft carriers, what an empire?
It's not an empire. The overseas territories are an historical technicality at this point. Britain isn't trying to be an empire, that's long in the past.
Britain is an Island nation, hence it's primary military concern which is defence, should focus on navy and then air force, then finally army. I do agree that the army needs more support though. Hopefully in time.
Bud you need to check up on your history, the British empire ended 200 years ago. All we have now is the UK and the Falkland and channel Islands.
@@cyanoticspore676 Your sentiment is correct but I think that it's fair to say that the empire effectively died around WW2.
There are also several overseas territories and other similar things. Check out this page, you'll find it interesting. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Overseas_Territories
@@cyanoticspore676 actually Britain has Gibraltar, Ascension Island in the Atlantic, a handful of caribean islands and the Cayman Islands and we own Bermuda, Britan also has the falklnds, Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean and a few islands in the Pacific aswell as 4% of cyprus are british millitary bases. Britan Also has a huge antarctic territory that’s 8x the size of Britain..
Actually Britain has a reduced army because we don’t need it but we have 112,000 including reservists, and 200,000 se nod reservists in times of war. We also have 9,000 royal marine commandos.
Need aressting wires as it can take most of nato planes as it is the NATO flgship
What a complete waste of money this and the other carrier is at £3bn each!! At a time when food banks in the UK are used by 5% of the population and the NHS doesn’t have enough beds we squander ridiculous amounts of money. The government needs to do the right thing and sell these to some other country who can afford such luxuries.
Were you dropped on your head as a child? The only reason you get to enjoy your privilages as a member of the UK is because we have the means to defend our democracy.
Ill not mention the £6,693,782,112 on top of this for 72 F-35's to fully fit out both of them, cos that'll really ruin your day.
I’m all for these ships they look great.
These ships do so much around the world . From protecting out subs that keep Russia in check . Deploy missiles to areas that are to hostile for soldiers.. not to mention humanitarian aid missions .. but I guess the cost is to much to keep people protected and save lives
@ Joel osgood You are entitled to an opinion of course...but you are still a moron!