The Most Fuel Efficient V10 Ever Made
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 гру 2023
- Thank you to Henson Shaving for sponsoring this video! hensonshaving.com/ use code "automotiveflux" for a free 100 pack of blades with purchase! (be sure to add them to your cart as shown in the video) Every purchase supports the channel!
Just forget about the fast that it's got 25hp and is 500cc's
shhh secret video • How To Make Interiors ...
/ automotiveflux
Get BeamNG.drive (affiliate link) www.humblebundle.com/store/be...
Automation on Steam: store.steampowered.com/app/29...
Follow me here
Discord: / discord
Stickers are here: automotiveflux.com/
Second channel here: / @brighthill6572
The Most Fuel Efficient V10 Ever Made
#automotiveflux #automation #beamngdrive - Ігри
The title is assuming none of you manage to beat my 1.1L/100km (please do) also don't forget the video sponsor Henson Shaving! hensonshaving.com/
(Use code automotiveflux for a free pack of 100 blades with your purchase)
V10? Cool! Fuel efficient? Also cool! Fuel efficient v10? Whaaa??? Add a manual and turbo andvtec system and I'm in!
rieisksnspsksk
For when fixtures get messed up, sometimes u can just hit the undo button and it makes it right for some reason
Hi @automotiveflux
I doubt you'll see this but I just made a v10 powered car that does 0.85 L/100km, it has a drag coefficient of 0.118 and weighs 512.8 kg.
Do you want me to send it to you? If so please let me know :)
With a 40 liter fuel tank you would be changing the oil after about 2 tanks’ worth of driving
I bet the tire would have gone from Somer, to winter, and back to summer at least 7 times before then.
11:42, yeah, e-CVT. They DO NOT have a belt like the CVTs you're thinking of. Hybrid CVTs have a generator motor in place of the torque converter and another motor to drive the wheels. They also have a couple of fixed gears for highway driving, and some have them for reverse as well. That's why hybrid CVTs are more efficient. Normal CVTs are actually the worst in terms of efficiency, but because they keep your engine in a more efficient regime, it tends to balance out and give a net positive gain in fuel economy.
Tractors need CVTs to put out the power they need whenever they have to. Your engine rpm keeps a constant at ~1300 and that’s okay for a diesel that only revs 2k
that’s why it’s called efficient because you couldn’t get this with any other gearbox
it’s efficient in other factors than fuel
@@frayziedaisy what is the job of a transmission? To put power down. So its efficiency must be a measure of how much power it puts down in relation to the power it receives. That's it. If you input 100hp into a cvt and it outputs 66hp to the wheels, it's less efficient than a standard gearbox that outputs 82hp from the same 100hp.
Now you can have whatever motive you want to have a continuous of ratios in your transmission, but that does not mean it's efficient in its job.
cvts = innefficient but sometimes effective for certain applications
the e-cvts use some kind of planetary gear setup to change the gear ratio based on the speed of the electric motor, it doesnt actually drive the wheels through that motor
Having a cat will allow you to use the emission optimization in the fuel map, which will massively increase your engine efficiency in this game. High flow three-way is the most efficient
The synchronizer issue is not with the auto clutch, you need to hold the shift button longer. new feature
yea, new update changed shift physics.
also tapping the clutch while shifting helps.
@@ARockyRockYea, it's shit... Noticed.
Not sure that's a feature haha, I will try to turn that off when I'm on controller
11:51 Hybrid CVT's are different than a belt driven CVT, it uses electric motors to change the output speed and therefore the gear ratio for whatever engine you have in there. a Belt driven CVT has mechanical loss due to slipping while changing gear ratios as well as loss through friction required to keep the chain tightly secured. this is why hybrids are so efficient, because it gets the best of both worlds, infinite gear ratios for the engine, and no mechanical loss.
If you don't size down the stroke you get more efficiency. Keep the bore as small as possible though. :)
I wondered if that would help
@@BrokeWrench I did as well, so I tested it while watching. I went from about 28% efficiency to 32%.
Came to say this. Undersquare is more efficient, but he just focused on making it as small as possible, which ended up being oversquare.
"I like fuel efficiency"
I don't, install a *leaded fuel afterburner*
I hope Automation/BeamNG will one day do actual aerodynamics simulation
when you go for fuel efficiency you can try low boost turbos
like 0.3-0.5bar
Here’s what u can do… use turbos but use very small ones and use smart boost setup. Of course highest quality
you know its a good day when flux uploads
id your evey tryign for efficency, goto the 4 grid view onthe engine, look at the bottom left panel for part efficency, and the bottom right for fuel efficency, you can see the green part expand and contract as you change parts
For the wheels, you should be able reduce width so long as you increase offset so they are flush with the side of thr car. more aerodynamic.
Hey Flux!, I still need to beat your goal of 1.1lkm.
I managed to achieve 1.3lkm in the Elisbury update.
So my setup is a 1.4l v10, magnesium block, 50mm bore, 71.3 stroke, DOHCX5, ALSI Head, Billet steel crank, titanium conrod, hyper cast pistons, and harmonic damper at .2, 16:1 comp, 0 cam 0 lifter vvt intake 3k rpm, two turbos with smart boost, intercooler set to 1020, standard geo, ball bearing, 30mm exducer 26.3 inducer with a 22 ar at 5.08 psi, the fuel system is Direct Injection Per Cylinder STD MID manifold set to 0, using LNG with -5 timing and a 0 for fuel map, o on the increase emissions control, tubular race dual at 12.7mm high-flow three reverse flowx2. All set to +15. This has given me 77.3hp with a 46.4 Engine efficiency.
I used the same sedan body as you: Carbon fiber panels, monocoque chassis carbon fiber, front transverse with MacPherson struts fronts, and pushrods rear. I added a front spoiler and a rear wing set to 0. FWD uses Auto Manual 8 speed, maxed out top gear, maxed out 1st, and spread set to 50 with a 205 limiter. Electric LSD, radials hard long life, 195 front, 225 rear, running 550r18, carbon fiber rims, carbon brake single piston at 160mm front and rear, undertray is flow optimized, no active aero or cooling flaps, cooling flow and brake flow set to 0 also, single-seater, with race interior and no entertainment, manual rack and pinion using tc+abs no safety 1940, weight optimizer set to 100, and standard springs, twin-tube dampers, and passive sway bars. I did a race tune for my suspension, springs to 2.8 and 2.0, damper set to 2.8 and 1.8, with no sway bars, and max ride height at 220mm. All qualities are set to +15 minus the safety quality that will be set to -15.
That is my setup! Feel free to roast my setup or improve on it!
1.3 with turbos? I didn't think that was possible
@@automotiveflux I challenged myself to do that! I will be doing a an builder later on. (don't know when, But I will update you on it!)
@@automotiveflux Nothing changed. Still at 1.3 even N/A.
@@canimetion9229 turns out I'm lucky with 1.1
try to make the most tuneable engine e.g. i6 that comes with 250hp but can make 1000 on stock internals
Would that even be possible to engineer?
Cvts are the most efficient transmission if you can specifically rune it to stay at an rpm/load, unfortunately people say that its weird and dont like it so most companys will tune "gears" for their cvts. That being said idk if its the most efficient in game
Honda had a good idea with the first Jazz/Fit, you could use it as a proper CVT or fake 7 gears with paddles, so at least there was a choice for the driver.
Good luck if you do try to do a low power/high efficiency showcase! Those things--in combination or separately--seem to get the discord all in a bother... 😁
Another fun video, thanks!
Just found your channel loving your videos! Keep it up manee
You should look into swapping a Mercedes OM606 and a ZF 8-speed trans into your Ram. Using a Turbolamik TCU makes the ZF8 almost as easy to swap as a 4L80. The Mercedes OM606 will almost instantly double your fuel economy, and you can relatively easily build it up to make the same HP and TQ as the Hemi without really losing the fuel economy at cruise speed.
My brain:
WHAT THE F*CK IS A KILOMETER!
vw did kinda make a xl1 ish car for the mass market the Lupo 3L tdi did 33 km/L if i remember right great car except for the fact they made it with a automated manual gearbox apparently made of paper
@automotiveflux
This is a great challenge, but i would argue what would be even more ridiculous, would bw to have an engine that is as inefficient as physically possible when using full throttle, but the second you step off it can hypermile better than a Prius.
holy shit. thats a good idea. Is that even possible?
I didn't know the front lip removal would be counted, that's interesting. I wonder if covering the rear arch (like a Honda Insight) would improve it further
I fuck w this series hard dude
no reason for XL1 to exist when Prius exists
29:20 DE JA VU!!
I think the only improvement would come from fewer cylinders and more stroke at this point.
God damn this engine is burning less gas than every European car burning an oil😂
How do you have a different work shop in automation and you make some neet cars
Nice!! Use a electric or electric variable steering, it helps on the ecconomy. Try MPFI per cylinder, maybe help. VVT should help on fuel ecconomy too. Depends on the engine config, try tweeking VVL RPM to give moore power on higher RPMs, in the game it doesnt change the efficiency of the engine. I Just subscribed now to help you to reach 60K!!
29:24 1cm drift
spawn with broken wheels > drives anyways
i don’t know it anyone else mentioned this but maybe if you gave it more stroke/ more torque it would be better in a city setting
Amazing how these two games advertise to work together, yet there's a lot of non-functional parts from Automation that just get bugged the fuck out when put into BeamNG
Try this with a V16!
Hey, could you do a Pikes Peak spec Semi-Truck?
Engine doesn't really matter, but the torque needs to be above 3k and have huge tyres.
Ive gotta try to make a car more efficient
Too bad there’s no cylinder deactivation
you seem to have to some options for engine parts im not seeing in my game, why is that?
I'm in the open beta version
First
11:35 This kind of reasoning is highly faulty because you do not know the rationale behind the decisions you are using to support your own conclusion. For example CVTs are highly unreliable and so force more work to be done, which means more after sale revenue for the manufacturer. Is this the reason for their popularity? No way of knowing. Additionally there's another serious problem with it in that those designers having made that decision does not always mean it is the best decision. Ideology, pet projects and things like that exist everywhere which can lead to the wrong decision being made intentionally and on top of that even experts are fallible and so their decision is not automatically correct.
A nice realworld example from the automotive sector is the cab-over truck. Cab-over trucks are superior to conventional or "American style" trucks in quite literally every way. But some countries out of tradition or preference have stuck to conventional (mainly US and AU). You often see attempts made to justify it such as "conventional has better cooling/more cabin space/better crash safety/etc." but none of those are actually true and they're part of a dynamic where people will make a decision first and then justify it later.
oil companies are going to dissapear you for this lmao