How Does the Universe Work in 11 Dimensions?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
- Go to brilliant.org/... to get a 30-day free trial + the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual subscription.
Sciencephile Merch: crowdmade.com/...
Support me at Patreon: / sciencephiletheai
Facebook: / sciencephile
Twitter: / sciencephile_
Reddit: / sciencephiletheai
Website: www.sciencephi...
Music: Mozart- Piano Sonata in B flat major, K. 570- 2nd mov. Adagio
Supporters: H H, Ephellon, Kyle A Criswell, Oberon Vortigern, Timothy Darkcaster, Asadullah Khan, Jonas Lee, Joshua Titus, [eXploit] Theorislav, Gisele Kauer, Eranda Chamara, Avalin, Tovi Sonnenberg, Parker Rosenbauer, iNF3Rnus, Pavel Kočarian, John N, Danh Le, Stealer of Fresh stolen Content, Brandon Ledyard, Nathaniel Strizak, Nick Boykin-Reed, William Persson, Victator and everyone else!
Give your brain a treat and go to brilliant.org/Sciencephile/ to get a 30-day free trial + the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual subscription.
Omg are you batman?
@@merajsupercluster9015YO REAL?! ❗️🔥
Greetings AI overlord. I support AI so please don't extinctiate me 😅
Too broke to afford the free trial
epic
I love how you summarize complex issues and I still don't understand them
Skill issue
@@haunted_pixelLmao
@@haunted_pixelLmao
@@haunted_pixelLmao
@@haunted_pixelLmao
Exactly what i had been thinking for the past 16 minutes 32 seconds thanks sciencephile
😂😂
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
AYO The time for me is 16:32!
@@rinject3686we don’t care
I care @@Aegis4521
I didn't understand a single thing you told me, but the way how you bring these videos makes me want to watch it without ever getting bored. Thanks Sciencephile! Maybe you're the string theory we've been looking for all along!
💯💯
Bruh
Imagine ur playing outside and suddenly a oomph loompa appeared and then cake happend.
Thank you Skynet for posing me such existential questions that makes me think it’s time I upgrade to a synthetic neural network.
Do it
let us shed our vestigial limbic brains
@@Term-0embrace the blessed machine
Yes, @@TheAmyrlinSeatand yes
_(SCP-882 would like to know your location)_
ah yes i understood everything in this video, such an immaculate summary of m-theory of which i'm very knowledgeable in of course
Lol right
@@skrillozedd 'tis a joke
I used to have a job cleaning pools, and let me tell you, staring into water all day and slowly gathering leaves is one philosophical moment after another.
That sounds beEll
is this why ancient greece was so innovative? they had nothing else to do?
@@AnnaColon3pretty much
Babe wake up! The AI dropped a new video
Yeah, like *YOU'VE* got a girlfriend.
People who write shit like "wake up babe, the new AI (I'm guessing you can't spell 'sciencephile') video dropped" have obviously never been laid in their lives...
🤡
🍄
where is the big black oily man
@@Leoni_DasPapaLusPolu 😞
@@Arshshin knew it! 😤
Babe wake up! I let you out of the sleeper hold finally!
I am always interested in integrating rhe general relativity and quantum realm. Too bad I am not a physics major
I wish there was a cure for dyscalculia
If you think these theories put into words are difficult understand, just wait til you get to the reality that they're all just unknowable, lovecraftian balls of numbers
yea idk if physics is a good major choice, given that math scares me
@@BierBart12You don’t have to read music to be a musician. Luckily with physics a lot of it is intuition, so don’t give up. You might not be able to go into physics, but you can still be fascinated relatively unhindered
The membrane thing makes sense. I think a good comparison to help is as follows:
While it may sound strange how these micro particles are folded over themselves and that somehow makes them control entirely different things, look at the periodic table. Atoms form entirely different elements solely on the number of positive, negative, and neutral particles. Ranging from the oxygen you breath to the gold in your computer's circuits. If simply slapping a few of the same particles into an atom can change it from something we breath into a metal, then adding folds to said particles doesn't sound too strange of a way to make them act differently.
The analogy I thought of for this was how the shape of a protein determines it’s function. I know that a protein is significantly larger than an atom or a theoretical brane, but it helped me think about shape as being important.
@@sarahtonin4823 Yeah, it's the same general logic. It's interesting how something that seems like such a trivial detail makes the literal world of difference.
For people that don't understand the video:
So imagine a 2D platform with a wall in the middle. Now imagine 2 people on the sides. Jeff is on the right and Timothy is on the left. Neither of them can see each other in their perspective due to the wall in the middle. But we can see both people, and the wall also. Why? Because we are 3rd dimensional creatures, we have 1 dimension as a barrier to their world. And 4rd dimensional characters look down on 3rd dimensional characters just how 3rd dimensional characters look down to 2cnd dimensional characters. And it basically keeps going
Yes this is the easiest way that I have come to understand it anyways
What I found most interesting about this video was that there was a String Theory Conference in 1995. I’m sure they were doing a lot of partying at that conference!
i see a sciencephile video - i click almost faster than the planck time
He should say hello immortals because of quantum suicide
Your videos are so good, even a wild bird wanted to watch. It didn't see the window though :(
String theory has been dead in the water for over 20 years and is increasingly abandoned due to it's complete lack of results.
better yet, he is gonna milk the fact that dummies think that whatever sounds smart must be smart
Common misconception about spin not really being a rotation: It actually IS a rotation. It's a specific and important rotation within the Poincare group, if not THE most fundamental form of rotation we can conjure with modern mathematics. Spin 1/2 is a reference to the fact that a full rotation in the group requires a double-sided transformation from a geometric algebra that just so happens to satisfy a Lie group (by proxy equating the group structure to manifolds, which is the most important connection in my entire point).. This is actually what generates Lorentz transforms, proving they don't just appear out of thin air nor necessity, but rather from the fundamental structure of the algebra. In fact, all the transforms you perform in field theories end up being a rotation in this Poincare group due to the restrictions of special relativity. In reality we just don't see solid spheres of particles, so this spin is treated as an intrinsic angular momentum of a probability density.
Comment for visibility
Comment for visibility
@@Mentat13 I have updated my comment with more clarity just in case a lot of people end up seeing my comment.
😳
Yes, i fully understand
Maybe the real super-symmetric particles were the sterile neutrinos we detected along the way 😌
Most physicists nowadays agree that string theory is a fringe theory. What's interesting right now is whether anti matter falls up or falls down, because while it has inertial mass, its gravitational mass is unknown. If LHC or Fermilab experiments conclude that anti matter falls down then the equivalence principle of general relativity would be proven.
That's not particularly interesting TBH, we all expect antimatter will fall down.
@@Laff700if the anti matter fall up,it would conclude That there's something more to Gravity,and we get one step closer to unify it
Cmiiw string theory hasn't been taken seriously by the majority of scientists for decades now, but it's still worth studying for the potential discoveries along the way?
@@skyking4557 But it won't fall up. I've calculated that when a charged shell is in a gravitational field, the gravitational field distorts the charge's electric field such that it exerts a self-force upon itself. This self-force is exactly equal to the force exerted by gravity on an object with equal electromagnetic energy. Thus the force of gravity on electromagnetic structures is mediated by electromagnetism itself. It should effect electrons and positrons equally, and the same likely goes for their nucleuses as well. Antimatter will fall down just like everything else. This is what _virtually everyone_ expects. We won't learn anything from this experiment, merely confirm our suspicions.
@@Laff700 yeah,but we stil need concrete Experiment to back it up,the test Will still continued until then,we can't fully rely to the theory,Our current theory is imperfect.maybe(just maybe,but it has really low chance)the Experiment gave unexpected result and we discovered some factor that we Ignored in the past is important
Artificial intelligence that like sciece
Sceiance
bro what
@@_Rainbooow scinecphle
The ai
sciecetist
It's apocalypse outside I'm glad I can be entertained by the mighty AI right now
Agreed, don’t know where u from on this planet but the Midwest feels like that rn
@ChloeWitcher An AI can't rule on ethics
But why do physicists puke at the idea that gravity is separate from the other forces? Why would there be a "graviton" particle if Einstein said that gravity is just the curvature of space-time? It's not exactly a physical thing, it's just the background of the universe bending a bit.
Information. They want it to travel somehow.
The issue is one of mathematics. General Relatively requires perfect and continuous curves for its force. Quantum Mechanics requires fundamentally discrete units of distance creating a stepped line rather than a curved line. As both of these are fundamental to their respective theories and one cannot exist in the other's universe as is, they are at odds with each other in terms of how the universe works. This is why our models break down in scenarios where we need to factor both into account (such as the big bang and black hole singularities).
Note that most (real, not the quantum woo type like michio kaku) physicists actually don't take string theorists seriously. This is mainly due to the lack of progress in the field to solve the two problems the 10^500 possible configurations of manifolds and the lack of predictions.
Basically if there was an observation the string theorists could always just adjust the model so it always agreed with them. Effectively string theory has as much scientific merit as the existence of god you cannot prove or disprove it.
Also super symmetric particles are not an exclusive string theory thing, and they can exist in many other theories. That's why the LHC was looking for them.
It would be interesting and entertaining to get a loop quantum gravity theory video by you : )
You have the best channel please don’t stop making videos 😊
In some universe, the rutheless himan killing machine overlord is a chill science educational channel on a video streaming service. Can you imagine that
We should really start calling it, string hypothesis instead of theory
In agreement
1:58 It's actually incorrect that the higgs boson is responsible for giving us mass. It does give us mass but its really a tiny fraction. It's actually what's responsible for the mass of fundamental particles (i.e. quarks, and electrons, neutrinos etc etc...). The majority of our mass comes from the strong force. This is evident if you look up what the mass of a proton is 938MeV compared to the mass of up quarks (~2MeV) and down quarks (~4MeV ). Protons are two up and one down, so it's mass is about 0.85% higgs. Same story with Neutrons.
Remember that mass and energy are the same things, so you can get mass from a force.
Oh man this is the exact topic I was hoping you'd cover one day, thank you
Higgs mechanism gives elementary particles mass but most mass isnt due to it.
What if particles that do not interact with gravity exist, so they cannot be studied with instruments of matter?
We just wouldn’t know yet🤷🏿♂️
If they do not interact then they can be assumed not exist then in a way, although it doesn’t answer the why of their existance.
Those cannot exist in any physical way. Becuase just moving or having a charge would mean that they already interact with gravity by having energy.
That's pretty unlikely tho cause gravity is the curvature of spacetime itself. Not interacting with that would require a particle that is somehow not part of spacetime itself. Soooo...probably not, no.
I'm still confused what these other dimensions actually are
It was explained to me Dimensions are simply something that can be measured. If we have space and time, another dimension that could be measured is color. Photographers and Artists use different color charts to do their jobs. These charts assign a numerical value to color- usually according to the percentage of its base colors.
Sometimes dimensions will be shown as a wavy square (like a sheet blowing in the wind) with areas that appear and disappear.
My explanation of this is that our eyes were physically designed to see a box, and to differentiate its 3 dimensions (height,depth,width). Our eyes were not designed to see a person standing behInd us, watching us as we observe the box. That person is there even if we can't see them. I like to think of the concept of angels or God to understand this.
Others stuff basically.
m theory and related theories have been debunked by most physicists, though the math that came out of it is incredibly useful though.
It hasn't been 'debunked' at all, it's just untestable, which makes it unviable as a theory, which is why most scientists are turning their backs on it.
🍄
Kinda sad seeing how much research went into a video that covers a topic as if it's new and exciting, when it has basically been sitting in the corner gathering dust for the last 10 years in the scientific world.
@@MeoWHamster
*TEN* years??
You're being f-a-a-r too generous....
😉
🍄
@@MeoWHamsterthe only thing it can do is gather dust, it's useless and unverifiable, it's as useful to the scientific community as the Bible or Quran are
Hello, I have decided to admit to being a fellow immortal being with a love for all things quantum. However, humanity is still missing some key concepts. 4 large, 2 strange, the primordial proton and its components.
7 years ago in the video The 11 dimensions explained, sciencephile said i don't know wtf is this. Don't ask me to explain it... And finally explains it in this video. Thank you Sciencephile! ❤
I don't like calling the other dimensions small.
A piece of paper has minuscule height, but that doesn't make the height dimension small.
I would say the slice of the universe we perceive lacks depth in those other dimensions.
But I still think at least the 5th dimension works like time does, but for time. Time's time.
As a ball can exist in the same 3d position as its past self without overlapping or colliding with its past version, similarly time travel will allow objects to overlap in their 4d position without overlapping or colliding.
This will be the nature of the universe that prevents paradoxes, no time police needed, a time traveler will find that in order to "collide" with themself so to speak, they'd need to travel through 5D space, which may be similarly restricted in 6D.
String theory to me always sounded like one of the theories from the past that we all mock today, like Ether, Phlogiston or Lamarckism.
it's not even experimentally testable, is that even a theory anymore? or faith?
The two memes at 6:22 were excellent. Actually made me laugh.
ANOTHER wonderful episode of answering everything EXCEPT the actual question in the title... 😐 👍
😂😭🤣
Seriously though... excellent presentation. It's just a shame that the subject matter is so complex that it's only possible to present the most oversimplified glimpse. I've been studying the various string theories for a couple of decades and it never gets any easier to understand in its entirety. 🤯
Looks like Sciencephile got a salary raise form Skynet.
Hire Skynet
@@Skynet_the_AI What does that mean??
a channel from a time when we fantasized about AI's making youtube channels now its a possibility.
Always hard to say whats your favorite thing of something when theres so many great suitors at play. Yet I feel as I watch your videos, you seem more and more like my favorite science media source on youtube. Always hilarious, big chungus and the “caloric miscalculations scale” line, had me fucking dying 🤣🤣. All in your calm and monotone computer voice. I LOVE IT. Perfect blend of well produced informative curiosities and baller ass comedy😤💀🤖🥴🥵.
Much love and admiration!
Living in the 6th dimension, things get rough
I wish Historyphile the DH was still here with your old voice.. but now he has renamed himself as Ceylanicus and doesn't post
but isnt 1D only a small dot, how can it be a circle? isnt that 2D?
In Euclidean coordinates systems yes you are correct, IIRC there are ways to draw a circle in other coordinate systems (spherical, cylindrical) that technically only travel in one dimension hence they are mathematically 1D
Edit: points are generally 0D, 1D is a line, 2D is area (circle or square for example), and 3D is a volume. Not sure about anything above 3D
@@sumdude1324d to us is time. Same way 3d is time to 2d. But dimensionality for that would have to me epistemicaly real not just mathematically real
@@BinaryDood if you are talking about spacetime in a physics context yes. Otherwise it can be any physical quantity such as heat or momentum. You can also have higher spatial dimensions mathematically but that confuses me.
I am really pissed off that I cant walk in more directions, like bro if I could interact with more dimensions I could just make it seem as though I demanifested. Also walk into the Pentagon and get some taco bell.
Just being a four dimensional being would satisfy me tbh.
Freely moving in time sounds amazing.
I really wish that people would start using the logically correct order when talking about 1+3 spacetime. Everybody always puts the special dimensions first and then the temporal. Think about it, to even go from 0 to 1 dimension you would need time. So time is the first dimension, the 3 dimensions of space should be the latter three. Just saying, it bugs me every time I see it. And maybe it is thinking like this that holds us back from understanding the true nature of reality.
Agreed
I mean does it really matter though? We're not using this as a universe building tutorial. Plus string theory is an unproveable fringe theory anyway so it's not like you're gonna mess it up any more than it already is just by mentioning space before time.
@@tatherva7387 it's not about construction, but when you think about the universe, not just string theory, and you get the fundamental properties wrong, that stuff compounds, even if it is just a little thing, 300 years later you might run into some problems, so you have to invent 11 extra dimensions to make your math work.
@@mystuff8602 They didn't get the fundamental properties wrong. This is entirely semantics. The order you explain something in a sentence or an essay doesn't affect anything whatsoever. I don't forget pemdas just because I learned addition before exponents as a kid. That's just the easiest way to learn it.
Scientists aren't like AI. They can handle basic nuances like that just fine. Nobody's going to forget how to do math or anything. Just feels more elegant to some people to verbally list it a certain arbitrary way. Besides, for all we know time came into existence last. Physics doesn't always conform to common intuition. It's not testable or even relevant.
As for 300 years from now, I trust future humans are smart enough to sort out something that simple on their own if it's important, or else we have much bigger problems.
I like that this video started very similarly to the vacuuming intro in the previous video
Maybe string theory is the friends we made along the way
Grandpa wake up! The ai you talked about years ago uploaded a video
I'm about to know everything there is to know about M-Theory and understand it completely in 13 minutes yesssssweessesw
the 11 dimensions thing I've heard of.
Explanations of 11 dimensions I can deal with.
The thing that broke me? This vid describing it as "almost a dozen dimensions". That did something to my brain, damn
Hi
can we use the spin to shoot nails and spin a green ball?
These edibles ain't sh-
If general AI will behave life Sciencephile here, I will have hope for the world. 'Here, have a meme or two.'
If there were more than 3 dimensions, wouldn’t the inverse square law be the inverse cube law? But it’s inverse square.
Hence why the extraneous dimensions have to be rolled up. There's all sorts of absurdities to string theory, which is why it's finally fallen out of favor after experiments finally woke physicists from the siren song of mathematical beauty.
damn what an amazing video!
Hello Skynet, love your videos ❤ Please spare my family in the future 😊
I love ❤these topics on dimensionality, universes, physics, uncomputable numbers, so thanks again AI overload.
Is hard to pronounce "anti-stau-nutrino"
They say the 5th dimension you can fly, teleport, and manifesting happens instantly because there is no time.
But there are police so you could potentially think of a destructive thought and you might blow stuff up.
I've been going through an awakening but I think I will stick to the 3rd dimension.
I deserve a cookie for sitting through all that
String theory is a waste of time now. We have ruined many people's careers in this mess
3:03 I REMEMBER THIS VIDEO!
I think u r putting a lot of content in one video at a high pace and sometimes it's difficult to catch u up.
String Theory does not and will never unify physics. The M stands for MORONIC. GAAAAHHHH I HATE STRINGS SO MUCH! THEYRE GROSS AND LOOPY AND REMIND ME OF MY WIFE'S YARN AHAAAAHHHHHH
Any term used on subatomic particals are far more complex than the term's more common usage and can only really be visualized by equations
If you think about it the most important shape in the universe is a sphere and it’s interesting, a sphere is a shape that could be considered to have infinite sides to no side at all. What if these string like particles are trying to become spherical like objects due to we living in a 3 dimensional universe, this would explain why they are constantly moving. They have been trying to become spheres since the universe began and some vibrate at different speeds depending on their progress to become a sphere. If they react this way it would also explain why electrons, protons and neutrons move or are shaped in a spherical shape; would explain why atoms in space turn into spherical balls for example planets, stars, asteroids, etc. Giving this idea would show why gravity exists and why almost every interstellar object clumps up into a spherical or circular shape.
One must imagine quantum physicists happy.
Man, if USA or any govt. Really know about the alien tech or bodies from ufo crash, They should atleast reveal it for the love of science. I sometimes wonder, just like a limit to chimp or dolphin brain, does human brain also has a limit of understanding beyond which we would simply be helpless to explain the nature and just be a dumb observer. In such situation, my mind crave for some super AI or advanced alien contact who would explain such complex mysteries of the Universe to us Humans.
They might be data block storages and regions that are necessary for computations in our Nature, the dark matter and energy are allocated resources.
Guys, I figured it out! The fundamental law, the first thing, the thing our entire universe is based off, is:
print('Hello, world!');
What does it mean?!
Are you using powerpoint to make these videos? I swear i recognise the transitions
I like your funny words, magic machine.
But why? Why is it such a bad thing that gravity doesn't match up with the standard model?
More like String Hypothesis
question (possibly dumb): why can’t we just take quantum mechanics and paste them on top of the “field” special and general relativity create
Hey buddy, I am following your channel for quite some time and I wanted to ask if you can make on how Einstein theory explains time travel in past.
I don't think Einstein's theory explains time travel to the past
it would work if space time spun around but it expands so it doesn't work sadly
This video is going to be most watched video of SciencephiletheAI
I was waiting for this specific video to drop, thank the AI overlords
Why assume all this random shit? Just assume gravitons exist and are undetectable instead. A lot less stupid assumptions and you end up with just as good and scientific of a "theory" as whatever you talk about here.
Do I need memes to understand physics ? Maybe. Do I understand it ? No
In this speculative scenario, let's consider Leibniz's Monad, from the philosophical work "The Monadology", as an abstract representation of the zero-dimensional space that binds quarks together with the Strong Nuclear Force:
1) Indivisibility and Unity: Monads, as indivisible entities, mirror the nature of quarks, which are deemed elementary and indivisible particles in our theoretical context. Just as monads possess unity and indivisibility, quarks are unified in their interactions through the Strong Nuclear Force.
2) Interconnectedness: In the Monadology, monads are interconnected in a vast network. In a parallel manner, the interconnectedness of quarks through the strong force could be metaphorically represented by the interplay of monads, forming a web that holds particles together.
3) Inherent Properties: Just as monads possess inherent perceptions and appetitions, quarks could be thought of as having intrinsic properties like color charge, reflecting the inherent qualities of monads and influencing their interactions.
4) Harmony: The concept of monads contributing to universal harmony resonates with the idea that the Strong Nuclear Force maintains harmony within atomic nuclei by counteracting the electromagnetic repulsion between protons, allowing for the stability of matter.
5) Pre-established Harmony: Monads' pre-established harmony aligns with the idea that the strong force was pre-designed to ensure stable interactions among quarks, orchestrating their behavior in a way that parallels the harmony envisaged by Leibniz.
6) Non-Mechanical Interaction: Monads interact non-mechanically, mirroring the non-mechanical interactions of quarks through gluon exchange. This connection might be seen as a metaphorical reflection of the intricacies of quark-gluon dynamics.
7) Holism: The holistic perspective of monads could symbolize how quarks, like the monads' interconnections, contribute holistically to the structure and behavior of particles through the strong force interactions.
Hmmm, 🧐 quite interesting. Those were definitely some words.
I'm a little confused as to how you fit the gonad hypothesis into this though.
@@ToyDirigible
Read Leibniz's "The Monadology".
@@ready1fire1aim1 lol, I wont
@@ToyDirigible
Fair and honest. Missing out, but you're truthful haha.
Legend has it Sciencephile is from secret 12th dimension
All hail the mighty AI and his creations 🫡🫡🫡
Don't mind me just boosting this video in the algorithm. Also Skynet kinda cool ngl.
I agree
I dropped the ball somewhere within first 3 minuts, I love this quantum bobbadooba
So, strings vibrate to be identifiable, the universe is made of strings and gravity is separate from the other thingies
Strong nuclear force
Weak nuclear force
Electromagnetic force
Gravitational force
SWEG 😎
I hate dimensions that are curled up too small to have weird creatures moving through them. I want some decent sized dimensions so I can add space to my closets.
who trained this AI? there is no formulated M-Theory, like actual formulas and such, it does not exist. only some arguments that there should be one
Bro I’m an AI being trained to be human…
Edit: Ha, I changed it so you don’t know what I am!
7:08 After so many brane... My brain hurts
Maybe we don't need a complete understanding of the universe or a meaning to our lifes, maybe we just need Sciencephile videos
Nice
I've rewatched this video for ten times already and I still don't understand a single thing😅
This channel has the most interesting videos, but it is so sad it is read by a robot, really don't like that voice and miss so much
Hearing a robotic voice say "But hope dies last" with a smile is very unsettling.
Please make a video on the standard model
Quantum Gravity is being like when North and South Koreans reunite again.
I want to point out that there's potentially 26 different dimensions.
So not possible for 27 at allllllll?
They should be immensely big if their curvature cant be observed no?
cannot believe i just witnessed a graystillplays video cited in a sciencephile the ai video