The Fermi Paradox Has An Incredibly Simple Solution

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 тра 2024
  • It’s possibly the most famous question in all of science - where is everyone? Join us today for deep dive into Fermi Paradox. 🌏 Get exclusive NordVPN deal here ➵ NordVPN.com/coolworlds It’s risk free with Nord’s 30 day money-back guarantee!✌
    The Fermi Paradox has been a topic of keen debate amongst scientists, astronomers and the rest of us for more than seven decades. We can't resist the urge to speculate about aliens! But what is the paradox even really about? What explanations have been offered? Today, we explore this famous question, and offer a mind-shifting explanation.
    Written and presented by Prof David Kipping.
    → Support our research program: www.coolworldslab.com/support
    → Get Stash here! teespring.com/stores/cool-wor...
    THANK-YOU to our supporters D. Smith, M. Sloan, C. Bottaccini, D. Daughaday, A. Jones, S. Brownlee, N. Kildal, Z. Star, E. West, T. Zajonc, C. Wolfred, L. Skov, G. Benson, A. De Vaal, M. Elliott, B. Daniluk, M. Forbes, S. Vystoropskyi, S. Lee, Z. Danielson, C. Fitzgerald, C. Souter, M. Gillette, T. Jeffcoat, J. Rockett, D. Murphree, S. Hannum, T. Donkin, K. Myers, A. Schoen, K. Dabrowski, J. Black, R. Ramezankhani, J. Armstrong, K. Weber, S. Marks, L. Robinson, S. Roulier, B. Smith, G. Canterbury, J. Cassese, J. Kruger, S. Way, P. Finch, S. Applegate, L. Watson, E. Zahnle, N. Gebben, J. Bergman, E. Dessoi, J. Alexander, C. Macdonald, M. Hedlund, P. Kaup, C. Hays, W. Evans, D. Bansal, J. Curtin, J. Sturm, RAND Corp., M. Donovan, N. Corwin, M. Mangione, K. Howard, L. Deacon, G. Metts, G. Genova, R. Provost, B. Sigurjonsson, G. Fullwood, B. Walford, J. Boyd, N. De Haan, J. Gillmer, R. Williams, E. Garland, A. Leishman, A. Phan Le, R. Lovely, M. Spoto, A. Steele, M. Varenka, K. Yarbrough, A. Cornejo, D. Compos, F. Demopoulos, G. Bylinsky, J. Werner, B. Pearson, S. Thayer & T. Edris.
    ::References::
    ► Jones, E. B. 1985, "Where Is Everybody? An Account of Fermi's Question": sgp.fas.org/othergov/doe/lanl...
    ► Hart, M. H. 1975, "Explanation for the Absence of Extraterrestrials on Earth", QJRAS, 16, 128: ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/197...
    ► Tipler, F. J. 1980, "Extraterrestrial intelligent beings do not exist", QJRAS, 21, 267: ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/198...
    ► Wright, J. T., Kanodia, S. & Lubar, G. 2018, "How Much SETI Has Been Done? Finding Needles in the n-Dimensional Cosmic Haystack", AJ, 156, 260: arxiv.org/abs/1809.07252
    ► Gray, R. H. 2015, "The Fermi Paradox is Neither Fermi's Nor a Paradox", Astrobiology, 15, 195: arxiv.org/abs/1605.09187
    ► Freitas, R. A. Jr. 1985, "There is no Fermi Paradox", Icarus, 62, 518: ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/198...
    ► Sandberg, A., Drexler, E., Ord, T. 2018, "Dissolving the Fermi Paradox": arxiv.org/abs/1806.02404
    ::Music::
    Music licensed by SoundStripe.com (SS) [shorturl.at/ptBHI], Artlist.io, via Creative Commons (CC) Attribution License (creativecommons.org/licenses/..., or with permission from the artist.
    ► Brad Hill - Echoes of Yesterday (0:00) [open.spotify.com/track/4AfA4T...]
    ► Brad Hill - Circle (5:22) [open.spotify.com/track/5ahoF1...]
    ► Falls - Life in Binary (9:38)
    ► Brad Hill - The Great Alchemist (14:08) [open.spotify.com/album/0sfu5x...]
    ► Brad Hill - There Is But One Good (19:03) [open.spotify.com/track/1vlxAs...]
    ► Joachim Heinrich - Y (25:01)
    ::Chapters::
    00:00 Introduction
    01:22 A Brief History
    06:13 Two Fermi Paradoxes
    08:16 Sponsorship
    09:38 The Eerie Silence
    11:56 Direct Fermi Paradox
    15:11 Capability?
    18:38 Motivation?
    20:53 Anthropicism
    25:01 Extragalactic SETI
    27:17 Outro & credits
    #fermiparadox #aliens #seti
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8 тис.

  • @LuciFeric137
    @LuciFeric137 Рік тому +3294

    The universe is likely many orders of magnitude larger than we can see. What we've done so far is like looking for fish in a teaspoon of seawater.

    • @augustgurtisen
      @augustgurtisen Рік тому +349

      Yeah, with binoculars from miles away

    • @Dianasaurthemelonlord7777
      @Dianasaurthemelonlord7777 Рік тому +78

      That is due to the expansion of Spacetime shifting light from unimaginably distant objects into... unintelligible garbage, or to the point it's nearly impossible to detect.

    • @youngimperialistmkii
      @youngimperialistmkii Рік тому +94

      Like being an ant. Standing on a leaf. Perched atop a tidal wave.

    • @brothermine2292
      @brothermine2292 Рік тому +85

      ​@@Dianasaurthemelonlord7777 : No, the expansion of spacetime is insignificant within a galaxy.

    • @MikeKayK
      @MikeKayK Рік тому +14

      Perhaps. And? Is there a point you were trying to make?

  • @brianarbenz1329
    @brianarbenz1329 Рік тому +1417

    Imagine finding out that Fermi was only commenting on the slow service by the wait staff when he asked, “Where is everybody?”

    • @ricardojmestre
      @ricardojmestre Рік тому +24

      😂

    • @MACHOO179
      @MACHOO179 Рік тому +18

      😅😅

    • @ljg6979
      @ljg6979 Рік тому +83

      The lesser known but more commonly felt, "Dining Services Paradox".

    • @timsmith2525
      @timsmith2525 Рік тому +18

      I truly simple-and elegant-solution. Kudos.

    • @protorhinocerator142
      @protorhinocerator142 11 місяців тому +24

      That's OK. Heisenberg still couldn't decide what to order anyway. He was so uncertain he ended trying to turn that into his life principle.
      True story, probably.

  • @wilson0213
    @wilson0213 Місяць тому +257

    I've always contributed it to the fact that the universe is so unfathomably large that the distance between life forms is just beyond comprehension

    • @randomdaveUK
      @randomdaveUK Місяць тому +16

      and constantly getting further apart

    • @formalities4983
      @formalities4983 Місяць тому +10

      Let's colonize the galaxy first. Then worry about the universe.

    • @formalities4983
      @formalities4983 Місяць тому

      At the rate we are going, we could, and probably will, colonize the galaxy sometime within the next million years. That is without faster than light travel. It took us about 4 billion years to become sentient. The oldest star in the galaxy is about 13 billion years old. There are an estimated 100 to 400 billion stars in the galaxy. Quite a few of them had a head start on us. Apparently, NONE of them developed a civilization that spread throughout the galaxy. THAT is the FERMI paradox. It is not about why we haven't found life. It is about why we aren't neck deep in extraterrestrial life. If 1 in every 100 million stars had developed an advanced civilization, there would be about 2,000 of them in our galaxy. Intelligent life may be that rare. It also may be that there is a reason it didn't spread throughout the galaxy. We just don't know.😊

    • @lorenrealname1326
      @lorenrealname1326 Місяць тому +4

      The moon is weird, just saying, I'm some nutbar who says things like, the Fermi Paradox was "mostly solved" by testimonies like Asimov on Astronomy (1974), or that "the Moon may have implications for that one chunk of the Drake Equation." I'm not opposed to Boltzmann Brains forming in the cores of stars but it seems uncommon.
      Leaving a star system is daring, but leaving galaxies seems to have vastly decreased returns. You only have to go so far to get out of a family dinner. Perhaps aliens are holed up in holographic storage awaiting a chance to fix the next universe at the get-go -- I wouldn't be surprised if this is NOT the case -- but yeah... distance and time-slash-rare circumstances looks like the deal to me.

    • @vinlondon8904
      @vinlondon8904 Місяць тому +4

      People always bring the vastness of the universe for the non findings.
      We can't even get a signal in our own galaxy.
      What's the universe got to do with it?

  • @skye4591
    @skye4591 Місяць тому +141

    "when was the last time you tried to converse with an insect" great line

    • @marflitts
      @marflitts Місяць тому +16

      I swore at a mosquito the other day.

    • @jonpaul3868
      @jonpaul3868 29 днів тому

      ​@@marflitts genius!

    • @tomperone9338
      @tomperone9338 27 днів тому +9

      Yet people study insects. Some people are fascinated by insects. So while an alien intelligence might not view us as intellectual peers, they might still be intrigued by us all the same.

    • @johnmartinez632
      @johnmartinez632 25 днів тому

      Bruh. In 268 years from now we will find our first exoplante inhabited by a species that'll be in its caveman days and OUR ENTIRE PLANET WOULD BE UTTERLY FASCINATED BY IT. Get real.

    • @Ash.Crow.Goddess
      @Ash.Crow.Goddess 17 днів тому

      While technically not an insect, I did apologize to a spider yesterday.

  • @pak-man7429
    @pak-man7429 Рік тому +910

    This reminds me of a joke I heard once.
    Some aliens are passing Earth and do a quick scan. One says, " This species has satellite base weapons." So the other alien ask, " So they are an intelligent species?" The first alien replies with " No, they have them aimed at each other." It a little dark.

    • @drmarine1771
      @drmarine1771 11 місяців тому +74

      Lol. It's like, why are all our telescopes pointing away from earth looking for intelligent life. Cos there's none here.

    • @thewholeeventhorizon
      @thewholeeventhorizon 11 місяців тому +24

      Yeah. Problem is if there is life out there they very likely got started much like us and were considered unintelligent in the beginning as well. We're not unintelligent we're just still very young and immature.

    • @Kunsoo1024
      @Kunsoo1024 11 місяців тому +29

      @@thewholeeventhorizon But it's also possible that planets exist with such an abundance of raw materials for proteins that it didn't require competition between entities, and yet something else spurred on the evolution that they don't even conceive as to why one organism would prey on another. We might be the stuff of nightmares to them.

    • @Lurzhanrus
      @Lurzhanrus 11 місяців тому +9

      @Kunsoo1024 That would inevitably lead to explosive growth of population till there is not enough resources to support population. So, the only way for life on such a planet to survive without violence - to regulate its population, which is done either by violence, or by law restricting reproduction. All of this applies that this life on other planet has reproduction at all. There just couldn't be a planet with unlimited resources. And limited resources lead to limited population.
      The only way I can see is some kind of genius species, that develops new technologies faster than resources demand grows.
      So, they leave the planet before demand for resources becomes unsustainable.

    • @campbelltown3065
      @campbelltown3065 11 місяців тому +1

      😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @MrCovi2955
    @MrCovi2955 9 місяців тому +880

    I heard a really interesting solution to the fermi paradox from a biologist. She was citing a recent paper where we found that phosphorus is not as common in the galaxy as we initially thought. In fact we have somewhat of a lottery winner here on earth with drastically high amounts as compared to other star systems. Phosphorus is a key ingredient in the storing and transferal of biological energy all the way down to the level of binding DNA together. She said that the paper she had read stated that phosphorus is one of those heavier elements that are formed in supernovae instead of just from fusion and so it is possible that, despite the age of the universe, there has not been enough time necessary to create enough phosphorus for other life to arise. And just like how we're "lucky" to be on the planet that has essential liquid water, we could simply be "lucky" to be in the corner of the universe, in the corner of the galaxy, which has just high enough concentrations for life to have formed here.
    If that were the case, then we are the precursors who will likely die out as a species long before enough phosphorus is created to support the types of galactic communities we dream of. It may very well be that eons from now, as the universe begins to evolve space faring civilizations, that our ruins are discovered scattered across the stars, and they translate our records of how alone we feel.

    • @harryc5595
      @harryc5595 8 місяців тому +122

      dude...

    • @nokta7373
      @nokta7373 8 місяців тому +197

      So we are actually the Ancients... I knew I was born too soon.

    • @empyrean196
      @empyrean196 8 місяців тому +66

      Possibly. But I more support the theory which states exactly opposite. We’re relatively young civilization. Other intelligent species are likely far ahead of us.
      Or the sheer vastness/immensity of outer space is too great for any intelligent species to communicate effectively with another.

    • @Dionysos640
      @Dionysos640 8 місяців тому +94

      There are numerous 'accidental' circumstances that have made the evolution of complex life on Earth possible, the presence of water and key elements are just some of them ... The very organisation of the solar system, with large gaseous outer planets acting as a gravitational barrier that minimises the amount of space debris impacting the earth .... the temperature on Earth goverened by its proximity to the Sun ... the Earth's magnetic core protecting the atmosphere from solar raditaion. When you think of all of the things that needed to be in place for it to be possible for the planet to develop and sustain life over periods of time that allow complex organisms to develop ... well, you begin to think that if life in the Galaxy and the Universe is indeed extremely rare, that should be no great surprise to anyone.

    • @molrat
      @molrat 8 місяців тому +32

      @@Dionysos640 i think about that a lot too. I don't necessarily believe it to be true, but i think most ppl are way too quick in the assumption of "the universe is so vast there HAS to be other life out there". We don't even rly know how the very first life formed, what if it's an unimaginably small chance, and the reason we got so "lucky", is easily explained by the weak anthropic principle?

  • @tagnetorare5401
    @tagnetorare5401 Місяць тому +23

    I appreciate your remark on semantics. It is very important for figuring out "which question we are discussing", otherwise the discussion could get too general and shallow

  • @Radhaugo108
    @Radhaugo108 17 днів тому +34

    100 years ago we were still traveling by boat while only 20% of the population could read and write. This space party is just getting started.

    • @tazerwazerman
      @tazerwazerman 13 днів тому

      Thousands of years of war has led to this technology. They need to master this planet first, the Ocean bottoms are vastly unknown and many people still can't read.

    • @Number6_
      @Number6_ 12 днів тому +1

      In 1924 america probably true do to the education system there.

    • @veganfromvenus
      @veganfromvenus 8 днів тому

      For sure, magical to become aware of this..

    • @jcldctt
      @jcldctt 5 днів тому

      If we don't kill ourselves through war or climate change, then I'm looking forward to new discoveries.

    • @pieterboelen2862
      @pieterboelen2862 4 дні тому +1

      Whatever is wrong with travelling by boat?

  • @KeithMoon1980
    @KeithMoon1980 Рік тому +872

    I've probably watched hundreds of videos on the Fermi Paradox, and it's so great to see something actually added to the conversation. Someone with something new to say, instead of just essentially reading out the Wikipedia page. Thank you!

    • @darksu6947
      @darksu6947 Рік тому +13

      You've been dead for quite a while haven't you? How have you managed to keep watching videos in the afterlife?

    • @MM-cz8zt
      @MM-cz8zt Рік тому +6

      Yes. Hear here! Your team does such wonderful work. Your channel is one of my favorite channels. Thank you to the entire Cool Worlds Team such thorough and clear explanations. You are truly bringing science to the people. :)

    • @KeithMoon1980
      @KeithMoon1980 Рік тому +35

      @@darksu6947 There isn't a lot to do here in the afterlife. So I mostly just watch UA-cam videos.

    • @Hannah-nf1vg
      @Hannah-nf1vg Рік тому +6

      Yea it didn't bring anything to the table, they're already here and don't even use radio for communication on their own planet why would they be emitting it

    • @sleadaddy
      @sleadaddy Рік тому +14

      Worth looking at Isaac Arthur's videos on the topic. Far beyond just a listing of facts to be found there!

  • @kayliibensen387
    @kayliibensen387 Рік тому +240

    Anyone who takes the time to focus on and present nuance on a subject like this is amazing. Thank you for your amazing dedication and work Dr. Kipping. This channel is what I imagined future science documentaries to be when I was a child, before the dark times destroyed television.

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior Рік тому +3

      I don't know how to break this to you, but television was never NOT crap, in terms of teaching anyone anything. It is for entertainment and making money, and virtually nothing else. If it ever gets to the point where science programs on YT aren't entertaining, they will stop, no question about it. They will also stop, meaning die a painful death, when some other medium becomes available that makes it about as interesting as hearing stories around a campfire, unceasingly, for your entire life.

    • @ejkr2051
      @ejkr2051 Рік тому +1

      But you forget Game of Thrones! That's an awesome tv series.

    • @Tom_Bee_
      @Tom_Bee_ 9 місяців тому +2

      ​@@MrJdseniorI'd take a decent campfire over the dumpster fire of social media culture any day

    • @squarerootof2
      @squarerootof2 8 місяців тому

      @@MrJdsenior Lol, I don't know how to break this to you but if you think television, (or social media), is purely for entertainment or money you probably live in a virtual reality, a fantasy world.

    • @halfsourlizard9319
      @halfsourlizard9319 8 місяців тому

      If you feel the need to be needlessly formal, you'd address him as 'Prof. Kipping', which is his more-prestigious / higher-precedence title.

  • @bhadbhris
    @bhadbhris 2 місяці тому +47

    Imagine a hypothetical comment section. You don’t see any comments, so you type “first” and hit send. You don’t reload the page, and therefore watch the whole video thinking that you were the first

  • @robotaholic
    @robotaholic 2 місяці тому +9

    I love your channel, and scientific judgments in various subjects. I love your voice and passion for the subject. Just thank you, Dr. Kipping 🤩👍

  • @kylesadirtbag5937
    @kylesadirtbag5937 5 місяців тому +120

    This is waaay too interesting to view at 3am and expect to go to sleep… I blame you for my insomnia

    • @MarinCipollina
      @MarinCipollina Місяць тому

      Sounds like you need a Sleepcore video

    • @ItsaRomethingeveryday
      @ItsaRomethingeveryday Місяць тому

      Sarcasm? 😂

    • @MarinCipollina
      @MarinCipollina Місяць тому +1

      @@ItsaRomethingeveryday Not at all 🙂

    • @ItsaRomethingeveryday
      @ItsaRomethingeveryday Місяць тому

      @@MarinCipollina help me to understand

    • @MarinCipollina
      @MarinCipollina Місяць тому

      Sleepcore videos feature old retro-futurism like IBM videos, TV company videos, car company videos talking about what they have coming in the future from a 1950s/1960s perspective.. weird, and a bit creepy today, but they'll put you to sleep.. just do a UA-cam search.. For instance, in one video, IBM talks about.. putting a computer on an airplane !! (It's a much bigger challenge than simply carrying your MacBook on board..) 😆Great stuff..

  • @TheFluffyDuck
    @TheFluffyDuck 8 місяців тому +132

    Great video! I’m an astrobiologist, published and all. My opinion for what it’s worth is simply distance, time and the inverse square law. We have only had a bubble of radio waves going for 80 years, with the furthest chance for a reply arriving tomorrow being only 40 light years away, in a galaxy a 105,000 light years across. That’s only 0.03% of the galaxies diameter. The chances a technological civilisation is within that is minuscule.
    Secondly is the inverse square law. The change any of our TV shows would “leak out”, and be detectable even by the largest telescope isn’t realistic. The signal would have attenuated well before a few light years. Of which there is only half a douzen stars at most in that sphere. Once again the chance a civilisation is in one of those few star systems out of hundreds of billions is low.
    The answer to the paradox is space is really really big, and artificial radio sources are puny.

    • @markhammond7060
      @markhammond7060 4 місяці тому +1

      Alcoholics anonymous is probably a more palpable option..

    • @dicerson9976
      @dicerson9976 4 місяці тому

      Yeah, alot of people call it a paradox that we see no signs of other civilizations- yet it seems so obvious that there is no way we'd ever be able to with current technology. Artificial EM waves, even all of those ever produced by humanity, are massively overshadowed by cosmic background radiation at extreme distances. Any given signal only has so much raw energy attached to it, and as it spreads out radially that power is gonna decrease dramatically- inverse square law as you said. Even if a signal of ours ever reached another life bearing planet with a technologically advanced civilization, the odds that they'd be able to detect it are functionally zero unless their tech vastly surpasses ours to a fairly incredible degree. To detect such heavily diluted signals amonst the collective radiation of every star in the visible universe is a herculean feat.

    • @Axel_Andersen
      @Axel_Andersen 4 місяці тому +2

      Exactly my thoughts!

    • @user-gn8rx2uy1n
      @user-gn8rx2uy1n 4 місяці тому

      astrobiologist already a thing?

    • @toshiyaar7885
      @toshiyaar7885 3 місяці тому +1

      I'm not an astrobiologist, but my thoughts exactly

  • @KemalH
    @KemalH Місяць тому +2

    Thank you for your engaging and informative content! I just found you and am really enjoying your videos. You briefly mentioned the great filter, and I was hoping you'd expand on that theory some more considering the topic. Would you consider making a video about the great filter and perhaps how it relates to this video topic?

  • @marcotrujiilo592
    @marcotrujiilo592 3 місяці тому +11

    I watch these types of videos quite often. It’s usually repetitive and I learn nothing new. This channel though, never fails to teach me something new and leave me mind blown. Great job Sir!!!

  • @chemprofdave
    @chemprofdave 11 місяців тому +136

    It’s quite possible that spacefaring civilization is rare because it requires a balance of ambition, discretion, and foresight which is difficult to achieve. Civilizations that have a strong tendency to explore and colonize may also be more prone to internal conflict that disrupts their progress. On the other hand, civilizations that are peaceful, stable, and happy might not care to go exploring. Finally, the resources required would need planning and development over long periods of time, whereas short-horizon use of the same resources would be a constant temptation.

    • @camilohiche4475
      @camilohiche4475 9 місяців тому +14

      And also I bet all the billion alien civilizations out there waste their resources and time on toxic useless social media, tiktoks, twitters, instagrams and whatnot.

    • @tufflucal4037
      @tufflucal4037 9 місяців тому

      ​@@camilohiche4475PRIMITIVE. PRIMITIVE. PRIMITIVE.
      Undoubtedly preposterous barbarious PRIMITIVE theory.
      You will never expand knowledge wise as a race, if you think small. Wake up.
      You are not told truthfully of actual space or Astronomy generally speaking. The Extraterrestrials that you may have been looking for are everywhere and yes, they know Earth as well, interstellar speaking at least.
      Peace ✌️

    • @FarmingUnclear
      @FarmingUnclear 9 місяців тому

      @@camilohiche4475 pleasure worlds

    • @Farazormal1
      @Farazormal1 9 місяців тому +6

      Also if a planet is any larger than earth than rockets become increasingly infeasible for getting into space. At 50% larger than earth (with the same density) rockets could not get you to earth’s orbit.

    • @FarmingUnclear
      @FarmingUnclear 9 місяців тому

      @@Farazormal1 I still haven't left your mom's orbit

  • @ZBeansUncut
    @ZBeansUncut 8 місяців тому +260

    The problem with the Fermi paradox is that there are too many assumptions to really take it seriously but it’s a great talking point.

    • @TrueBlueYZ
      @TrueBlueYZ 8 місяців тому +30

      Agree, and that includes his version of the 'direct' fermi paradox. It's a naive question, not a paradox.

    • @nathanmajor6886
      @nathanmajor6886 8 місяців тому +7

      @@TrueBlueYZnicely put! the universe is likely far bigger than we are capable of understanding “yet” I personally believe once we reach a certain threshold on earth like no war being the main thing if we cant even get on with ourselves how are we gonna react to alien life…… once we hit this point i think they will make themselves known and allow us to come to them as to not create a panic then we could possibly learn of an inter galactic community….. its just as unlikely as it is likely its interesting to at least think about!

    • @SeattlePioneer
      @SeattlePioneer 8 місяців тому +7

      Yes, something new for intellectuals to do when they are bored with life.

    • @SophiaAphrodite
      @SophiaAphrodite 8 місяців тому +4

      In comparison. We have searched in such a small area of space. It is the equivalent of looking at a glass of water of the ocean looking for a fish. Now if we consider the short period of time we have been detectable. The odds of us being detected is so slim. It equates to zero in the context of a human lifespan.

    • @SeattlePioneer
      @SeattlePioneer 8 місяців тому

      Of course that is not true.
      Carl Sagan set up a testable scientific experiment to search for intelligent, extraterrestrial life. We have conducted that experiment numerous times:
      Results NEGATIVE.
      He even wrote a novel about it --- "Contact," in case you haven't read it.
      In it, he expected alien intelligence to make a point of contacting us rather shortly after radio transmissions reached them.
      The galaxy crowded with intelligent life Sagan hypothesized has not panned out.
      YOU simply refuse to accept the results of scientific experiment because it doesn't appeal to what amounts to your religious beliefs.
      We detected the radio signals of the Big Bang DECADES ago, defining the edge of the known universe. No intelligence other than our own has been detected in that enormous volume.
      However, if something should turn up ---fine. Call me.

  • @Painter19
    @Painter19 Місяць тому +4

    Great sound quality and narration. Excellent production work

  • @am.655.
    @am.655. Місяць тому +79

    Who’s here after 3 body problem?

    • @mohitsasidharan6002
      @mohitsasidharan6002 23 дні тому +4

      Haha, this video popped on my UA-cam after watching 3 body problem.😄

    • @BRODA01
      @BRODA01 22 дні тому

      What a coincidence 😹

    • @papabuzz12
      @papabuzz12 21 день тому

      That show resurfaced my interest. Lol

    • @EXMUTRKS
      @EXMUTRKS 20 днів тому +4

      Yes I'm here because I'm curious to see what he says the solution to the Fermi Paradox.
      And I have been looking stuff up related to the 3 Body Problem.

    • @BarryVP12
      @BarryVP12 10 днів тому

      I read the book a little while back.

  • @MotoHikes
    @MotoHikes Рік тому +132

    I freaking love it when you film in the woods. As an environmental science student with a fascination for physics and space, it's the perfect juxtaposition, talking about something so advanced in a setting so very primal. Poetic.

    • @seionne85
      @seionne85 Рік тому +1

      I agree! As someone who grew up in a forest just before the Internet, I appreciate the work you do

    • @mrsoisauce9017
      @mrsoisauce9017 Рік тому +8

      I mean, he’s talking about possible life forms while standing in the natural world. Talking about life while standing in life. Poetic indeed, but for different reasons

    • @imacmill
      @imacmill Рік тому +10

      The original 'green screen'.

    • @Just.A.T-Rex
      @Just.A.T-Rex Рік тому +2

      That’s what my degree is in from Appalachian state university!

    • @FilmscoreMetaler
      @FilmscoreMetaler Рік тому +2

      Dude that's just a background image.

  • @jameswebb8162
    @jameswebb8162 Рік тому +91

    Wow, didn’t know there were more than 1 Fermi hypotheses. That you so much for the episodes. I’m not able to go to college due to my cancer (multiple myeloma) and really enjoy continuing my my education!! I am a 10 year warrior and continue fighting till their is a cure!!

    • @galaxia4709
      @galaxia4709 Рік тому +18

      I sincerely hope you get better! Take care!

    • @CoolWorldsLab
      @CoolWorldsLab  Рік тому +27

      Keep fighting and hoping you recover

    • @pit2ryan3
      @pit2ryan3 Рік тому

      @@CoolWorldsLab - It's not a fight!

    • @diaryofacrankykid7270
      @diaryofacrankykid7270 Рік тому +8

      @@pit2ryan3 as someone who's recovered from one it is exactly a personal fight like no other. You won't know until you've been in those shoes mate.

    • @keanenfulton4696
      @keanenfulton4696 Рік тому +6

      ​@@pit2ryan3 Yes it is bud

  • @sambamiam
    @sambamiam 2 місяці тому +2

    Top UA-cam channel. The only notification I have ever turned on. Please discuss in depth the Miller-Urey experiment.

  • @Sabreerbas
    @Sabreerbas 2 місяці тому +2

    Not sure how I've only just found your channel. Incredible.

  • @kevley26
    @kevley26 Рік тому +89

    My hunch (for what little it is worth) is that if there are intelligent aliens in our galaxy, there is only a small number of them and that it is not in their nature to expand a lot and build megastructures that we could observe. I think there could only be a small number of them because it would be improbable that none of them have expanded rapidly enough to be observed by us.

    • @inthefade
      @inthefade Рік тому +31

      My hunch is that we just haven’t been looking long and hard enough.

    • @rodrigomachado5291
      @rodrigomachado5291 Рік тому +8

      Your logic is sound, kevley.

    • @jackesioto
      @jackesioto Рік тому +26

      Or maybe our nearest neighboring civilizations may not be advanced enough technologically to go interstellar. They could be in their version of the medieval period, antiquity, great age of sail, etc.

    • @85Funkadelic
      @85Funkadelic Рік тому +33

      Yeah I don't think we should assume that these aliens would build megastructures have faster-than-light travel or even colonize outside their own solar system much less use radio waves that we would be able to detect. It's like looking out your window not seeing any people and saying there are no people.

    • @o0o-jd-o0o95
      @o0o-jd-o0o95 Рік тому

      i think that most civilizations end up killing themselves before reaching the ability to leave their solar system ... similar to what is going to happen to us. At the same time I do not believe we are ever going to leave our solar system I don't believe that we can survive without our star and I mean ours specifically. I think that all life that develops within the system of its star can never leave that star without dire consequences. If it wasn't for our star the sun we would not be here and I believe that without our star again we would not survive

  • @MasonHerrick
    @MasonHerrick Рік тому +349

    That this channel has less than 10 million subscribers is arguably more mysterious than the Fermi Paradox.

    • @psywalker7973
      @psywalker7973 Рік тому +26

      Nobody I know can really follow, nor appreciate what is being presented in these videos. They want to watch stuff where no thinking is required.

    • @brown3394
      @brown3394 Рік тому +13

      Same principle applies. Yes, the channel will necessarily reach 10 mil. First it has to hit 5, and 3, and 1. Some of us lucky few had to be part of that first sub-mil in order for it to reach 1, then 5, then 10, and so on.

    • @MasonHerrick
      @MasonHerrick Рік тому +3

      @@brown3394 😁

    • @jeremiahwollander7364
      @jeremiahwollander7364 Рік тому +6

      Amen brother.
      It'll get there though. There's certain videos that can suck you in regardless of your intelligence level. My partner is nowhere near the level of science nerdiness I'm at... But she still really appreciates the way he can tell a story and how he can make anything mundane be like velvet cheesecake to the ears.

    • @MMAFightMagazine
      @MMAFightMagazine Рік тому +2

      ​@@brown3394 Few people understand this. They feel that if a channel is "good," then it should have a similar number of subscribers as other great, well-established channels, "instantaneously."

  • @AlmightyDude420
    @AlmightyDude420 3 місяці тому +25

    23:05
    I'm gonna need some time to process that
    What an insane, but also completely logical thought.

    • @mahande88
      @mahande88 2 місяці тому +5

      I agree, and here's a really dark twist for you. If our galaxy is the only one without AGI's on a mission of galactic conquest, then WE are the ones to let the AGI loose in this galaxy.

    • @Thunderhorse007
      @Thunderhorse007 2 місяці тому

      @@mahande88 That is an interesting thought. If we develop a way to detect it and discover that lots of other galaxies are overrun by AGI, then the implication would be truly harrowing. To know that the advancement of technology would be our doom...

    • @thingonathinginathing
      @thingonathinginathing Місяць тому

      Might explain certain NHI described here on Earth. Tbh

    • @ParallaxEffect
      @ParallaxEffect Місяць тому

      Maybe the filter is when those capable enough to see the other AGI colonies then work hard (brutally destroy / outlaw/ self destruct) to prevent themselves becoming one themselves.

  • @tommymandel
    @tommymandel Місяць тому

    Thanks for a beautiful video. I didn't understand all the reasoning, but feel that the distances are so vast, and our issues here so great, that it doesn't really matter, other than to induce in us a sense of humility.

  • @olddecimal2736
    @olddecimal2736 Рік тому +54

    Considering potential scenarios with an open mind without perpetuating pet assumptions, beliefs, hopes or conclusions sets you apart, Prof. . Many thanks and much respect to your realistic contributions

  • @wildoskistudios9217
    @wildoskistudios9217 Рік тому +54

    I love the conclusion to this video. wrapped up perfectly... Plus the fact you took the laptop and mixer outside for a more natural setting. 5 stars :D

  • @Kaush.
    @Kaush. Місяць тому +5

    We are living on a leaf of a shrub in a very large dark forest.

  • @ab2tract
    @ab2tract 14 днів тому +2

    The milky way is 100,000 light years across, the first signal we intentionally sent into space is only 50 light years away...the speed of light pales in comparison to the size of the universe

    • @mk1st
      @mk1st 17 годин тому

      Plus our signals are quite puny and will attenuate away to the point of being undetectable.

  • @zik2000
    @zik2000 Рік тому +309

    I like to think that Fermi returned from Starbucks and no one was in the office so he asked "where is everybody?"
    And we just took it and ran with it 😅

  • @jeremiahwollander7364
    @jeremiahwollander7364 Рік тому +131

    I am so glad I found this channel. You are a master at conveying deep thoughts in a succinct, approachable, and at times poetic manner.
    I also love how rewatchable a lot of your videos are. Your 'Watching The End Of The World' video is so beautiful, and I've even fallen asleep to it multiple times.... It's like an adult bedtime story that is so relaxing. It's your voice cadence and the fact that I can just hear the love you put in to these videos.
    Keep on being an amazing, brilliant, and loving human.❤

    • @James-fe7wd
      @James-fe7wd Рік тому +1

      Amazing channel, must be said!

    • @prototropo
      @prototropo Рік тому +2

      Well put, Jeremiah. I love that video, too, along with all the videos in which Dr. Kipping has narrated the interwoven histories of the Milky Way, our solar system, Earth, life, complex intelligence and the cosmos. The principles and possibilities that are elucidated along the way are just boggling. And riveting!

    • @warrenreid6109
      @warrenreid6109 Рік тому +1

      In short thanks for dumbing this down for us laymen.

    • @uncleanunicorn4571
      @uncleanunicorn4571 Рік тому +2

      Cool world guy should do a collaboration with Isaac Arthur.

    • @prototropo
      @prototropo Рік тому +5

      @@uncleanunicorn4571 I agree! I think Dr. Kipping once referenced Arthur quite admiringly. For me they are the quasars of plausible speculation -- propelled by boyish enthusiasm and anchored by scholarly rigor. In fact they sort of function as gyroscopes for some incredibly intelligent but sometimes zany communities, maintaining equipoise in our collective imagination.

  • @Yonneax
    @Yonneax 4 місяці тому +1

    Your voice is amazing. I love listening while doing yoga. Very soothing. ❤❤❤

  • @omarbahrour
    @omarbahrour 13 днів тому

    Great vid, I like the way you present material

  • @nw42
    @nw42 Рік тому +122

    The Fermi paradox in a nutshell: “Why isn’t there evidence of intelligences with totally different evolutionary paths from our own doing what only _some_ of us would do: attempting to contact us with 20th century technology across almost unfathomable distances? We’ve been searching for them for over .02% of humanity’s history, but we’ve still found nothing!”
    Don’t get me wrong, the search for extraterrestrial intelligence is fascinating, yet I feel like many of us have grossly underestimated the scope of the challenge.

    • @captain_context9991
      @captain_context9991 11 місяців тому +11

      Pretty much, yeah. There IS no Fermi paradox. We dont need one to explain why life is rare and far apart in the universe. And life that walks around and has its own space program, almost INFINITELY rare. See... No Fermi paradox needed.

    • @captainscum5726
      @captainscum5726 11 місяців тому +12

      the Universe is so vast in space/time and Life so short in comparison that the scale of the task should be obvious to everyone, it seems to me.

    • @garyfoster9478
      @garyfoster9478 11 місяців тому +6

      The Fermi para , does make me laugh. 2 things it doesn't take into account the fact that there probably going to be extra dimensional . Which means conventional space travel doesn't even come into it. Aslo there's a very good chance / probably a certainty that first contact with at least one race has already been made in private. This will never ever be disclosed. The reason for this is people riot when there's no toilet role on the shelves of lidl. Imagine what would happen if this sudden revelation was to occur. It would be catastrophic

    • @Kingeptacon
      @Kingeptacon 11 місяців тому +1

      “Why isn’t there evidence?” This is a shit ton of evidence. We’re spoiled with evidence.

    • @captain_context9991
      @captain_context9991 11 місяців тому +7

      @@Kingeptacon
      Spoiled with evidence of what?

  • @zebcode
    @zebcode Рік тому +66

    I've been watching this channel for some time now. The content is always interesting. The presenter is awesome. I love the style of presentation, not stupidified , no spoon feeding. This has become one of my favourite vlogs and I really appreciate the thought provoking content. Please keep doing what you're doing.

    • @happychappy492
      @happychappy492 Рік тому +2

      You look like you are ready to rob a bank with that mask on

    • @ejkr2051
      @ejkr2051 Рік тому +2

      He probably already did,hence the picture. 😉

    • @benmckinley1940
      @benmckinley1940 11 місяців тому

      Cool Worlds and Melody Sheep are my two favourite space themed channels.

    • @Atheist7
      @Atheist7 11 місяців тому +1

      @@happychappy492 I agree...... Or, Hallowe'en every day over there.

  • @Nathan-vt1jz
    @Nathan-vt1jz 3 місяці тому +2

    The weak anthropic principle is a good caveat in looking at any probabilistic theory, but I also think it can be overstated or dismissive of attempts to come to an answer. I think the weak anthropic principle is better used to highlight where we lack data than as a silver bullet to probabilistic questions like the Fermi Paradox.

  • @robertmatthews4244
    @robertmatthews4244 4 місяці тому

    Well said.
    Nice presentation.🙏

  • @joshuapatrick682
    @joshuapatrick682 8 місяців тому +6

    Simple answer: we are causally disconnected from our closest stellar neighbors with few exceptions. There is no traveling from one system to another without distorting gravity and therefore space time.

    • @BillyWitchDoctorDotCom
      @BillyWitchDoctorDotCom Місяць тому

      Or just hoof it at sub-light speed.
      Planets (and stars for that matter) don't last forever, you either have to leave or die at some point.

  • @Mustachioed_Mollusk
    @Mustachioed_Mollusk Рік тому +25

    Imagine how ground breaking it would be to speak with insects!
    All life is worth investigating much in the same way subatomic particles are worth observing. Possibly
    Love this stuff. ❤

    • @DreamskyDance
      @DreamskyDance Рік тому +1

      Considering your name, i have to mention that the finishing statement in this video reminded me of scp-7999 tale. I watched it few weeks ago on the "the exploring series" youtube channel. It's about kind of a solving of Fermi paradox, but a beautiful tale. Read or watch/listen to it... you'll probably like it

    • @I.C.Weiner
      @I.C.Weiner Рік тому +1

      I talk to the bees l the time. They are so dull. All they want to talk about is gathering nectar.

    • @pit2ryan3
      @pit2ryan3 Рік тому

      @@I.C.Weiner - They don't gather nectar, they gather pollen... And don't steal their honey...

    • @keanenfulton4696
      @keanenfulton4696 Рік тому

      ​@@pit2ryan3 I love honey, make me stop.

    • @PhoenixNL72-DEGA-
      @PhoenixNL72-DEGA- Рік тому

      @@pit2ryan3 Uhm, no they gather nectar from flowers, mixed with basically their saliva this turns into honey. Pollen are a trick used by the plants, and are bascially stowaways in the hairs and legs of the bees which the bee accidentally deposits on a subsequent visit to another flower of the same genus. AKA Bees do not consume pollen, nor do they visit flowers to gather them intentionally.

  • @RobinMcAulayPhotography
    @RobinMcAulayPhotography Місяць тому

    Such a great and elegant dialogue.. Well done ❤️

  • @dreadblock7592
    @dreadblock7592 8 місяців тому +79

    Reminds me of Liu Cixin's book series The Three Body Problem, his explanation being that survival and natural selection still take place in space with Aliens doing their best to hide while other Aliens hunt for other civilizations.

    • @rinzlr3554
      @rinzlr3554 3 місяці тому +11

      I’m glad I didn’t have to scroll this far to find this. The Dark Forest theory is nothing but terrifying

    • @stunxna
      @stunxna 2 місяці тому +1

      @@rinzlr3554terrifying if real bc of how noisy we have been but it is quite something to ponder on

    • @rinzlr3554
      @rinzlr3554 2 місяці тому +1

      @@stunxna as of now with our technological capabilities, I’m not too worried. We transmit a lot through radio waves and they tend to degrade quickly. Unless an advanced alien civilization had some kind of ability to detect something so small then they already know we exist or they don’t care, or both. It’s going to be a far different story when we (if) become an interstellar civilization that can transmit across light years.

    • @joejoe7562
      @joejoe7562 2 місяці тому +1

      The Dark Forest idea is interesting but I don't believe ultimately, realistic. Intelligence wants to connect with other intelligences.

    • @dreadblock7592
      @dreadblock7592 2 місяці тому +1

      @@joejoe7562 hard to agree, most humans attacked and enslave or went to war over resources, land, religion, etc regardless of if the enemies had si.ilar lvls of intelligence. Ive never seen the FIRST interaction being an attempt at understanding. If anything, the idea of a species connecting with another species is unrealistic, the cultural difference and appearance would make it difficult to connect.

  • @RLReagan
    @RLReagan 8 місяців тому +8

    This guy speaks so well. He’s easy on the eye too. I don’t know his name but I like his presentations.

  • @romans323ful
    @romans323ful Місяць тому

    This is so interesting, I really regret not getting a healthier more deep curiosity in all the sciences and especially astronomy / mathematics theories long before spending 59 years on this earth.

  • @bgwe1393
    @bgwe1393 2 місяці тому

    We are again left clueless. An interesting take, thank you :)

  • @jamesrussell7760
    @jamesrussell7760 Рік тому +34

    Very thought provoking, Dr Kipping. Reminds me of the SF novel of a self-replicating robot 'culture', originally intended to explore and report back their findings, but whose computer programming (their machine DNA) went awry, leaving only the "self-replicating" part intact, the result being they became an interstellar plague, destroying the life they were sent to find.

    • @DrumToTheBassWoop
      @DrumToTheBassWoop Рік тому

      Whats the name of the novel? 🤔

    • @asdrake1327
      @asdrake1327 Рік тому +1

      @@DrumToTheBassWoop Good old Gray Goo

    • @DrumToTheBassWoop
      @DrumToTheBassWoop Рік тому

      @@asdrake1327 pardon ? 🤨

    • @asdrake1327
      @asdrake1327 Рік тому +1

      @@DrumToTheBassWoop Gray Goo is a book about the extinction of all life on earth via endlessly replicating nanotechnology that resembles a gray goo

    • @DrumToTheBassWoop
      @DrumToTheBassWoop Рік тому

      @@asdrake1327 oww, okay i'll give that a read.

  • @neanda
    @neanda Рік тому +25

    I hope that your videos are used in high schools etc., they're so much more insightful than the teachers who feel forced to teach. There's a big difference between those who love to teach and those who have to. It's the education system that's wrong, and I'm so glad we have people like your good self making videos. Communicating science must be an extremely hard job, like switching between knowing a fk ton to making it a gram. Nuff respect brother

    • @veramae4098
      @veramae4098 Рік тому

      Ummm, it would help schools if kids were polite.

    • @falconquest2068
      @falconquest2068 Рік тому

      @@veramae4098 Ummm, it would helps kids if parents taught and practiced values like politeness.

  • @xnickanix
    @xnickanix 29 днів тому

    what I take from this video are the ideas of anthrophic principle and fine-tuned universe. Very intriguing. Thinking about roaming AGI kinda reminded me of Roko's Basilisk.

  • @timothydube2222
    @timothydube2222 Місяць тому

    how do i get a list of the movie clips you showed? I'm really intrigued to watch the films of some of those clips

  • @BoatmakerBot
    @BoatmakerBot Рік тому +53

    I believe it was called as a Paradox because the initial assumptions and coefficients give rise to millions of civilizations as solutions, just in our Milky Way Galaxy, yet we have the 'eerie silence' as you reminded us earlier in this video.

    • @nevisstkitts8264
      @nevisstkitts8264 11 місяців тому +8

      There is no silence. We just don't know how to listen.

    • @davemccombs
      @davemccombs 11 місяців тому +7

      @@nevisstkitts8264 Ohhhh, edgy

    • @adamnguyen4517
      @adamnguyen4517 11 місяців тому

      ⁠@@nevisstkitts8264 There can still be silence. Noise is an active action, and if they decided to just stop we’d hear nothing.

    • @olivercharles2930
      @olivercharles2930 11 місяців тому

      @@davemccombs ...I don't think that was edgy in the slightest.

    • @RuckFussia
      @RuckFussia 11 місяців тому +2

      @@davemccombs How's that edgy?

  • @hermesbrookover285
    @hermesbrookover285 Рік тому +12

    This is hands down the best analysis of the Fermi paradox that I have ever seen. Well done Cool Worlds.

  • @christopherbettridge5983
    @christopherbettridge5983 Місяць тому

    I'm really enjoying yer way of explaining yourself man, seriously. People talking about extraterrestrial superluminally "minded" organisms? Whatever. But your last video (last to me only, of course) about the ridiculous indifference to whether or not this is a simulation (my emphasis, as I genuinely get frustrated by such things taking up not only people's curiosity but their whole lives when there is SO MUCH to be curious about) really struck me. So I have to point out, and I ramble when I'm sleep deprived sorry, that the "aliens" ain't stealin' the DSNY litter receptacles. They're RETURNING them. Hence- "Where is everybody?" Nice mike, by the way

  • @JohnCiaccio
    @JohnCiaccio 2 місяці тому

    At the end of Neromancer by William Gibson there was a conversion between a human and an unleashed AI. Where the AI says that they where out their all the time trying to talk to us and it took an A.I with unrestrained power to recognize it. Gibson even touched on this back in the 80’s.

  • @UNATCOHanka
    @UNATCOHanka Рік тому +23

    Fermi, looking at an empty mess hall:
    "Where is everybody?"
    Everybody:
    "omg what could he have meant by this!!!"

    • @CoolWorldsLab
      @CoolWorldsLab  Рік тому +10

      I think Fermi would think the whole thing was ridiculous

  • @noylj1
    @noylj1 Рік тому +19

    Have you considered that we might be on one the first solar systems with heavy metals required for technology? It would at least four stages of Nova to spread enough heavy metals to get enough on a planet

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 Рік тому +4

      I've actually thought about that a lot. Humanity is kind of lucky since we got tons of coal, oil, and gas which provides insane amounts of energy, not to mention some good easily domesticated work animals. Just looking at different cultures we can see the effects of those things.
      Pack animals are thought to be a major reason why Old World civilizations became so much more advanced then New World ones. A horse or ox can do the work of a handful of men and they can eat foods we cant (grass) basically making them a free source of labor. That meant many tasks could be done by animals freeing up more time for humans to ponder, plan, and think which meant faster technological advancement.
      Things like water wheels and windmills grew from similar machines done by animals but at greater efficiency. It's thought that the widespread use of that kind of tech was why Europe advanced faster in the middle ages and early modern period. Without the earlier machines built for animals like the ox mill we'd likely have taken longer to develop the windmill.
      Widespread use of charcoal and later coal is what created the industrial revolution. Without both coal and lots of metal it wouldnt have been possible and the amount of work even a simple coal/steam powered machine can do compared to manpower is INSANE. I've heard the earliest practical steam engines could do the work of an entire work crew or village. Once we started using oil and gas that got even more insanely efficient. For a frame of reference a pre-modern laborer could burn 3000-8000 calories in a day (which includes nearly 2000 just to carry out bodily tasks and survive) but a single gallon of gas contains around 32,000 calories and a single GRAM of uranium is around 200 million calories.
      Without a metal rich planet, fossil fuel deposits, or other key resources it would take far, FAR longer for any civilization to develop. Not only would it take them far longer to develop to the point of using solar, hydro (assuming earth levels of water), or wind but they'd also have less efficiency compared to fossil fuels which would mean getting to space would take them forever to achieve and only then would they be able to get access to the levels of minerals we have on earth.

    • @Brickerbrack
      @Brickerbrack Рік тому +2

      I've made a similar argument myself. I don't know about needing _four_ stages of novas, but from my (limited) understanding, I'd say at least _two,_ and considering our solar system formed when the universe was about, what, 9.3 billion years old?, that sounds tentatively like _just_ enough time for two generations of stellar life cycles, _maybe._
      And never mind the _metals_ for technology; the key thing is _intelligence,_ and _that_ requires time and evolution, and a fairly specific set of circumstances; namely, an environment that's volatile enough to force life in it to adapt in order to survive, but not _so_ volatile that it snuffs everything out before it can start. Our planet managing to maintain 4 billion years of relative, but not _complete,_ stability, has to be a pretty rare thing, I'd surmise.

  • @skyybluu3118
    @skyybluu3118 Місяць тому

    Great video thank you 👍🏻

  • @thingonathinginathing
    @thingonathinginathing 2 місяці тому +2

    Turns out Enrico Fermi was read-in to the UAP Phenomenon. So, he did know about non-human Intelligences. Therefore, it's "Fermi's Disinfo"

    • @scottgardner4487
      @scottgardner4487 29 днів тому +1

      This is awesome, why do scientist totally ignore the current UAP phenomenon? They are seen under the water all the time.

    • @thingonathinginathing
      @thingonathinginathing 29 днів тому

      @scottgardner4487
      Astrophysics Dr Kevin Knuth suggests maybe some Popularizers of Science have invested interests in ignoring and disregarding this topic, which has been stigmatized for so long.

  • @ericbarr734
    @ericbarr734 11 місяців тому +48

    That was an incredible sign off. I love putting the entire discussion into the frame of our own limited time and what power we have to achieve our goals in that limited time.
    Thank you for that. Your videos are meaningful from a science education perspective but also from a personal motivation and well being perspective.

    • @masonb9788
      @masonb9788 10 місяців тому +1

      Our time is a tiny sliver. The odds of any other slivers matching up with ours and also having the ability to communicate or travel? I just don’t see it.

    • @tufflucal4037
      @tufflucal4037 9 місяців тому

      ​@@masonb9788PRIMITIVE. PRIMITIVE. PRIMITIVE.
      Undoubtedly preposterous barbarious PRIMITIVE theory.
      You will never expand knowledge wise as a race, if you think small. Wake up.
      You are not told truthfully of actual space or Astronomy generally speaking. The Extraterrestrials that you may have been looking for are everywhere and yes, they know Earth as well, interstellar speaking at least.
      Peace ✌️

  • @MrAaronvee
    @MrAaronvee 11 місяців тому +76

    Fermi always liked to pose questions, such as 'how many piano-tuners does San Francisco need', and get an answer on the basis of simple assumptions. When he applied his usual reasoning to alien visitation, the answer simply turned out to be zero. It may have been thought to be a paradox at the time because it seemed to run counter to Drake's equation.

    • @eriknelson2559
      @eriknelson2559 9 місяців тому +2

      "where are they all" = "The Bugger Formic Invid Zentraedi Robotech Masters are overdue"

    • @oldionus
      @oldionus 9 місяців тому +10

      Drake's equation was forumalated years later and makes WILD and completely unsupported assumptions to arrive at a large number, when making more reasonable, conservative assumptions will generally yield the number zero, or one, since we are here. (Galaxy; if you consider the whole universe it's a bit different, but uncorroborable). I suspect Fermi himself would've taken Drake, set some of the parameters to "effectively zero," and arrived at the conclusion that WE are a fluke.

    • @Alexander_Kale
      @Alexander_Kale 8 місяців тому +5

      If I recall correctly, Fermi didn't see it as a paradox. He just concluded that interstellar travel was likely too hard. SO even if there WERE other intelligent species out there, they would remain cooped up within their respective solar systems.
      It just becasme a paradox later, as people began to conclude that maybe space travel isn't actually impossible.

    • @eriknelson2559
      @eriknelson2559 8 місяців тому

      all large-scale science, from Geology (Planetology) to Cosmology, has always advanced from the principle of Uniformity (Uniformitarianism) = "what's here is there is everywhere & when"
      confirmed batting average to date = 1.000
      slugging percentage = 4.000
      strikeout percentage = 0.000
      never (yet) failed
      always (yet) proved true

    • @squarerootof2
      @squarerootof2 8 місяців тому

      @@oldionus We are a fluke, the solar system is a fluke and the whole universe is a fluke. We should be called the fluke species on the fluke universe fine-tuned for fluking flukes.

  • @user-hz9zb4vr7d
    @user-hz9zb4vr7d Місяць тому

    The expression "your making a mountain out of a mole hill" come to mind!

  • @skorpion7132
    @skorpion7132 2 місяці тому +2

    The most simplest way I can see/say this is like: Imagine the universe of Stargate SG1/Atlantis or even SGU, then take away all the stargates: ... and voila.
    We just do not know and there are far too many different possibilities as to why.

  • @LOOY756
    @LOOY756 9 місяців тому +185

    We tend to assume aliens would develop on similar lines to us, animals that evolved to become smarter, then built machines to enhance themselves, but it's entirely possible they'd just be so weird we wouldn't recognize them as life initially.

    • @shadowling77777
      @shadowling77777 9 місяців тому +11

      Cybertron silicon based transformer life xd

    • @mightisright
      @mightisright 8 місяців тому +30

      Temporal explanation: Why didn't humans interact with dinosaurs? Their lifetimes never overlapped. That's just on this planet. Aliens not only have to span the universe to get here, they would have to arrive at the right time for us to see and hear them. Allegedly they have already done this, but the people who say this are dismissed. So what do you want if you have no ears the hear, eyes to the see or brains to think?

    • @Alexander_Kale
      @Alexander_Kale 8 місяців тому +16

      I mean, sure, if it behaves like inert rocks, we might overlook it. But as soon as it starts building stuff, or in more general terms, "doing" stuff, you would be hard pressed not to recognize it.
      For crying out lout, one of the necessary properties a mortal entity needs to have is self replication. That would be pretty hard to miss under any circumstance I can think of.

    • @LOOY756
      @LOOY756 8 місяців тому +9

      ​@@Alexander_Kale That you can think of, with your brain made of meat.

    • @GreenBlueWalkthrough
      @GreenBlueWalkthrough 8 місяців тому

      To be fair they kinda had to if we assume they come from this universe and developed like us.

  • @teugene5850
    @teugene5850 Рік тому +22

    Professor Kipping - you continue to make me excited for learning and asking the big questions! Thank you!

  • @bct1959
    @bct1959 4 місяці тому +4

    I love that Feynman's mischievous mug is right next to Fermi's at the beginning.

  • @Antzzz_Manzzz
    @Antzzz_Manzzz 14 днів тому

    Incredible narration 👏🏼👍🏼

  • @Dusticles8291
    @Dusticles8291 Рік тому +5

    Always look forward to seeing the new videos! Great educational and objective content! This channel is the sole reason I found my interest in astrophysics. Thank you for all of your hard work, research, and dedication! I will definitely be donating in the near future.

  • @GG-bw5qd
    @GG-bw5qd 8 місяців тому +5

    I assume the answer is some combination of life being less common than we've assumed, life being younger than we've assumed, and space being so big that it's really hard to look for anything.

  • @swimdeep189
    @swimdeep189 Місяць тому +1

    When you've seen one there is no Paradox. You all carry on.I know the truth and i am grateful and blessed to be aware of the Truth before i pass.

    • @steelswarm2721
      @steelswarm2721 Місяць тому

      I believe you. Can you describe what you've seen?

  • @phillipprak9683
    @phillipprak9683 12 днів тому

    Imagine being an alien and wondering the exact same things that we are and just not having technology to reach us or communicate with us. The topic around aliens always revolves around the idea that there’s so much more technologically advanced than we are when in theory, they could be doing and wondering, the exact same things we are “where is everybody?”

  • @IDisagreeWithYouAlot
    @IDisagreeWithYouAlot 5 місяців тому +18

    Man this is truly a great channel. Please don’t stop doing what you’re doing. For the sake of humanity.

    • @krzysztofkowalski2816
      @krzysztofkowalski2816 Місяць тому

      you owe the 2000 for rent we charge, you cant just our price is out of this world.

    • @RingoAnselmo
      @RingoAnselmo Місяць тому +2

      Pffff slow down bro he is just a small meaningless youtuber

  • @orazha
    @orazha Рік тому +21

    I am so glad that I came across your video. I'm currently reading Michio Kaku's Parallel Worlds. It's an excellent book that helps understand what's currently going on in science today. I enjoy thinking about all the possibilities such as we may be similar to bateria on a hanging fruit with all of it's variations. Or that we may be like the bacteria completely unaware of the "living" beings who are all around us but with no obvious awareness of us. We may even be riding on one of these beings.
    I look forward to listening to more of your videos. You do a great job of presenting.

    • @DriveLaken
      @DriveLaken Рік тому +2

      I like to take that same line of thinking and compare us to the people of North Korea. We look at them and think, “poor things are so ignorant about what’s really going on…”
      What if we’re all that ignorant about a much bigger reality that we are just clueless about.
      The people of North Korea are no different than us, in the West. So, if it can happen to them, why not us?

    • @ejkr2051
      @ejkr2051 Рік тому

      I'd like to think,therefore am sure that I'm no bacteria. But you go ahead and be a bacteria if that makes you feel better.

  • @cabnbeeschurgr6440
    @cabnbeeschurgr6440 17 днів тому

    The idea of looking at stars to see possible eclipses indicating dyson spheres is both really cool and really terrifying. Do we really wanna throw radio transmissions at something that has the capability to build objects on a solar scale?

  • @High_Key
    @High_Key 8 днів тому

    I’ve been deep in the ancient civilizations rabbit hole for the past couple of years now and based on extinction level phenomena that could occur on earth, I’d argue that this happens on many planets in many galaxies. Pair that with the sheer distance between celestial bodies, and to me this is the answer. Civilizations that are smart enough to *eventually* develop the technology for interstellar travel, just may never get the opportunity to.

  • @watcherofvideoswasteroftim5788
    @watcherofvideoswasteroftim5788 Рік тому +38

    I feel like the first 6 minutes was a great reason to call the question "Where is everybody?" poetic because it educes a lot of great questions that all hold answers that help us understand our own position in the universe and how much we have yet to learn about biology, society, technology and our selves.

    • @procrastinator9
      @procrastinator9 Рік тому +3

      Funny. I was going to comment that the viewer should skip the first 6 minutes to bypass the semantic word salad before he even started addressing the point of the video.

    • @XL-5117
      @XL-5117 Рік тому +2

      It’s interesting that Where is Everybody is the first episode of The Twilight Zone!

    • @Shwammi
      @Shwammi Рік тому

      okay, now after @procrastinators and your comments... I now must watch this. :)

    • @TomTom-du5qv
      @TomTom-du5qv 11 місяців тому +1

      Perhaps they all left the visible universe as soon as they had the technology because they understand that "sticking around" results in inevitable death.

    • @Alphadestrious
      @Alphadestrious 11 місяців тому +1

      Distances are too vast. Life exists elsewhere but the physical limits of speed of light cannot be over come

  • @1edgeman76
    @1edgeman76 Рік тому +39

    Dr. Kipping, I will always graciously follow any journey of thought, understanding, and realization you ever want to lead. You and the Cool Worlds Lab are amazing and one of THE BEST resources on UA-cam. Thank you and your colleagues for everything you do.

    • @CoolWorldsLab
      @CoolWorldsLab  Рік тому +7

      Thanks! Yes we want to genuinely advance the conversation and our understanding.

    • @mattparker9726
      @mattparker9726 Рік тому

      @@CoolWorldsLab then look at the past to see the future.

  • @melissawickersham9912
    @melissawickersham9912 2 місяці тому

    Could you please list your sources for the film clips that you used?

  • @evanmccue736
    @evanmccue736 4 місяці тому

    Our radio waves have barely left a small fraction of our own galaxy. Even if something heard an old broadcast a couple hundred light-years away, it would take 200 years for a response.

  • @jonathanvelazquez4876
    @jonathanvelazquez4876 9 місяців тому +7

    In a universe so vast, and not long ago, humans believing we were at the center of the universe, makes me realize that those who are still believing we are alone are once again as wrong as our ancestors were.

  • @noapologizes2018
    @noapologizes2018 10 місяців тому +112

    The Fermi Paradox gives aliens too much credit, especially the ability to transmit responses to our electronic inquiries. And even more presumptuous is assuming aliens have interstellar traveling capabilities. Maybe there is some sort of life on some far off planet millions of AUs from earth, but they have the same problem man has. He's stuck at home without a ride.

    • @Tom_Quixote
      @Tom_Quixote 9 місяців тому +23

      Yep. This is the ACTUAL simple solution to this so-called "paradox". This channel calls it a conditional paradox... I'd say Occam's Razor suggests aliens are simply not able to travel or communicate across the vast distances.

    • @Tigerh8r
      @Tigerh8r 8 місяців тому

      OR - that they already did and are long gone. The chances of a race on an even remotely the same level of technology as us and them or their "signals" crossing paths with us out here on the unfashionable western spiral arm of the galaxy within the 50 years we've been searching is insanely small. Could be plenty way below us, or way above us. Their signals might not be here yet, or maybe they've been here and gone. The galaxy is almost 14 billion years old.

    • @austinhertell5634
      @austinhertell5634 8 місяців тому

      Exactly. Seems pretty simple. I think there are aliens, but we’re just too damn far away

    • @legendofrobbo
      @legendofrobbo 8 місяців тому +6

      except not really
      large scale human civilization has existed for only 6000 years or so
      in the last 200 years of that we have gone from horse and carriage and everything being hand made to automation, computers and crude spaceflight
      that is an absuredly tiny period of time on the galactic scale, barely a blink
      unless we are the first or among the first sentient life to emerge then any other alien civilization would have had practically unlimited time to develop before us
      granted it could be that FTL travel is impossible and despite all their advanced technology they still have to wait decades or centuries for a ship to fly to the next star, so they exist but simply haven't had time to reach us yet (or they know of us but don't deem it worthwhile to fly all the way over here and contact us)

    • @teaser6089
      @teaser6089 8 місяців тому +12

      ​@@legendofrobboactually humans were able to develop so fast due to the large coal reserves. These coal reserves were only able to develop so large, because bacteria were unable to eat trees for hundreds of millions of years, bacteria evolved this ability randomly.
      If on an alien planet bacteria would develop this ability much faster, or large trees didnt develop as fast or at all and instead large ferns would exist for much longer than on earth could reduce the coal reserves of that planet drastically! This would in tern effect the speed of development of that alien civilization, they might need to spend much longer developing machines that dont use coal, without the fast revolution of steam power that was our industrial revolution.
      Maybe their planet doesn't have a medium-large continent in the same spot as earth has Europe, which due to physics has the perfect climate for large population centers to develop on the most fertile soil and instead has a much slower population growth and therefore less pressure to develop new technology.
      Maybe they Arent as warlike and therefore didnt have the same pressures to develop many of the fields of technology that have their routes in fighting war that humanity has, many of the tech we use each day has their routes in tech developed for war after all.
      Maybe their planet has 1-5% more water than earth and therefore has much smaller landmasses spread further out, also causing a slower growth.
      The other way around is also possible, but the argument that we were able to get where we are in X amount of time is no proof that other would be able to do the same. Just look at the differences on earth itself, even if we ignore colonization and go back to a time where Europe barely influenced Africa directly, we see that Europe developed MUCH faster(and still does) than other regions of the world, if these differences exist on planetary scale, it is very reasonable to assume this is the case for Interstellar scale as well.
      There is no doubt that there are more advanced and just as advanced civilizations out there, but just because they exist, doesn't mean they want to visit us.
      I mean how many people from Europe want to go visit Africa and take a look how tribes live their life, the number is small and well going to Africa is a small distance, now imagine traveling thousands of light years to go look at some monkeys and their small problems. I'd bet that apart from some of their scientists finding it useful to observe us, they dont need to actually visit us to do that.
      We are a species that record so much of our daily lives with video and audio recordings, writing it down in blogs and we all put it publicly on the internet.
      The only thing an alien species has to do to observe us, is put a low observable probe somewhere in the Galaxy and connect to our internet, if they are advanced enough to travel here, it's reasonable to assume they can produce a probe that is not observeable by our current technology and connect to our internet without being detected, by doing this they can observe our species through our own eyes, the billions upon billions of gigabythes of data we all produce and put on databases would be more than enough to observe us and they could always put a probe closer to take pictures and videos from space to get even more information.
      If you look at our development and with current telwscopes(both space and ground), the upcoming and well theorized telescope concepts, we could very well be within 100 years of being able to have sub meter sized resolution from Earth when observing Mars or Venus. Now a days if James Webb was in the moons orbit it could see an object that was 50 meters big, obviously James Webb wasnt designed for this, so we could probably already do better if money wasnt the problem.
      Therefore my 5 cents is that aliens dont need to even come visit us, when they have better tech then us, cause they could do it from afar and our own experience as a civilization and our development cant just be copy pasted to an alien world, cause the environment will always differ for them.

  • @mickieg1994
    @mickieg1994 29 днів тому

    The Idea of hearing a clear transmission that accounts to a hello would be quite terrifying, given the idea that it was from so long ago that they dont exist anymore, we will only ever hear/see an alien civilization millions of years after they have long since gone extinct.
    Knowing that any attempt of our own would have the same result.

  • @curerose0630
    @curerose0630 Місяць тому

    23:17 hey this is extremely similar to what I thought this morning while sitting in maths class. It’s that using calculus or whatever, we can calculate the probability of something happening, and that probability may be 99.9%, but after that something actually happens, the probability is 100%.
    So the probability of galactic colonization might be 99.9%, but the fact that it hasn’t happened here means that we fall in the 0.1% category, and that 0.1% is actually 100% to us

  • @jakem.8608
    @jakem.8608 9 місяців тому +3

    Thank you Yugopnik! I appreciate your videos and educational content, it really puts things into perspective. We gotta stand together!

  • @harriehausenman8623
    @harriehausenman8623 Рік тому +9

    Great production quality as always: Perfect audio, really smooth editing and a fine B-Roll (some sources would be appreciated here 😉)
    Oh, yes, and the content, of course 🤗
    Thanks eveyone!

  • @evilblack2416
    @evilblack2416 26 днів тому +1

    >"A ten thousand year space flight would not be a problem for an AGI"
    The power consumption and heat output of GPUs running Stable Diffusion would like to have a word with you.

  • @kitersrefuge7353
    @kitersrefuge7353 Місяць тому

    Directly under our noses is a vast body of evidence, spanning physical + testimonial, that point to the fact that we have been visited numerous times, and probably over millennia. There is credible game theory thinking that posits that keeping silent as an advanced civilization is an optimal strategy for survival + the fact that the distances involved, negate the 60 yrs or so of us "listening" make the endeavour a) possibly futile b) too immature expectation-wise. Having said all that, the content is excellent and a create clarifier of the Fermi Paradox (conditional at that!), so my thanks!

  • @pramitd7761
    @pramitd7761 8 місяців тому +6

    At this point even Aliens would have started using NordVPN.

  • @bigjermboktown6976
    @bigjermboktown6976 Рік тому +30

    Mr. Kipping out of the many channels on UA-cam yours is certainly one of the top 5! Absolutely love everything you do and thank you

    • @SAPANNow
      @SAPANNow Рік тому +1

      *Dr

    • @rossclutterbuck1060
      @rossclutterbuck1060 Рік тому +1

      @@SAPANNow * Professor

    • @RoySchl
      @RoySchl Рік тому +1

      who are the other 4?

    • @bigjermboktown6976
      @bigjermboktown6976 Рік тому +1

      @@RoySchl SEA, WhyFiles, Cold Fusion, and there may only be 4 I couldn't really think of five that I really enjoy as much as those

    • @V1CT1MIZED
      @V1CT1MIZED Рік тому +2

      ​​@@bigjermboktown6976 SEA is awesome along with this channel.

  • @how2b407
    @how2b407 Місяць тому +1

    I think of it this way. We are a species living on an inch in Alaska's Wrangell St. Elias National Park & Preserve (a national park that has about 13.2 million acres). Or a centimeter in yellowstone national park.
    Whatever the analogy the fact of the matter is if we do see signs of live we will have to go through stages -
    1. Confirmation - how do we even confirm that a planet contains life if its located in a different solar system? The closest star to ours (Proxima Centuari) is 4.2 light years away. Thats about 80 thousand years.
    2. Contact - how the hell do we communicate with them? What if their system of communication is different? I guarantee a 99% chance they dont speak any language that are on earth.
    3. How do we get their - we currently do not have the technology to get there. Although this might change in the next few decades.
    No matter how you look at it we need major advances in technology (in computers, communication, travel, and space) to even make inter stellar travel possible, much less find other life forms.

  • @idonttext9783
    @idonttext9783 4 місяці тому

    I've seen things on this subject but it's the best theory available

  • @peerpede-p.
    @peerpede-p. Рік тому +4

    Thank you for this explanation on The Fermi Paradox, so far the most comprehensive I've heard.

  • @ianmccourry9337
    @ianmccourry9337 Рік тому +9

    I think it is worth pointing out that considering AGI is *also* a conditional paradox, similar to the ones talked about before. We might not actually be able to create AGI for whatever reason, which would open the galaxy up to not being colonized with chemical rockets with AI, but by potentially other means, if at all. It is also worth noting that iirc our star is a 3rd generation star, and during star generations before this one would not of had the heavy metals necessary for life or technology.

    • @RAFMnBgaming
      @RAFMnBgaming Рік тому +1

      I don't think it's necessarily a paradox. After all we have GI already so even if we never create AGI, you can probably substitute GI in there with enough time and tenacity.

  • @NunyaBidness-ck5wb
    @NunyaBidness-ck5wb 14 днів тому +1

    Great video, but I disagree with the finite time assumption at the end. While as individuals it is true we are limited by the time we have, there is no definitive proof that collectively we are thusly limited.

  • @leonr1985
    @leonr1985 Місяць тому +1

    Until the time we can fully explore the North and South pole and whatever lies beneath the ocean, we can never do tell if alien did or did not visited Earth

  • @KippiExplainsStuff
    @KippiExplainsStuff Рік тому +4

    your videos are some of the best content on the web. can't believe it's free. I drop everything when I see a new one has come out

  • @LoicRolasLRD
    @LoicRolasLRD 8 місяців тому +9

    I believe there's a crucial aspect of the solution that has been rarely explored. Let's assume the existence of other life forms in the universe, and let's also assume that these beings share our motivation to seek out other life forms. In this context, a vital question arises: "Are we currently detectable by life forms possessing technology equivalent to ours?"
    Approximately 150 years ago, we initiated the transmission of radio signals, with a more focused effort toward being detectable beginning around 60 years ago. As things stand with equivalent technological capabilities than ours, humans can be detected within a radius of 150 light years. This, however, only accounts for a ridiculous tiny portion of the size of our galaxy.
    Consequently, even though we are certain of our existence, we remain imperceptible to 99.99% of the rest of the galaxy with our current level of technology. So any other life form out there will probably also think that humans do not exist.

  • @robertrestivo
    @robertrestivo Місяць тому

    @16:30 Replicators. _That's_ the tech I'm waiting for!

  • @waichui2988
    @waichui2988 Місяць тому +1

    Last night I wanted to have lobster dinner. I wonder why no lobster showed up at my door.

  • @manueloliveira200
    @manueloliveira200 Рік тому +8

    I just recently discovered this channel and I´m glad I did. Interesting content presented really well. Thanks