When you take a break from all these overwhelming physics mysteries, play War Thunder for free and get an awesome starting bonus pack with vehicles, boosters, and more at playwt.link/sciencephiletheai
@@Hamburgerhumaneven deeper is when you realize we do know how lightning and ice skates work, but we don’t understand the reasons as to why those processes work (and we probably never will)
Small note: We don't actually know if the interior of a black hole has a singularity or not. Usually, singularities indicate problems with the physics equations being used, so there's probably something else going on.
On of my favourite conjectures is black hole cosmology: in Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates, the singularity connects the black hole interior with a white hole interior (from which all world lines diverge), which can be interpreted as black holes producing a universe in its interior, which by extension could mean our universe is the interior of a black hole and we we would exist in a long evolutionary process of black holes creating black holes, each universe condensing in a difference state with slight variations in for example couplings, particles etc
@@sebastianjovancic9814there’s some interesting parallels between the hot dense particle soup beginning of our universe and what a singularity might actually be. Would be pretty trippy to imagine everything nested witching black holes. But how would phenomenon like hawking radiation and expansion come into play?
We don't even know for sure weither black holes even have an interior in the first place. Every property of a black hole is "stored" in its event horizon. The common saying that everything inside a black hole is not really part of this universe anymore could be true in a more literal sense than many people anticipated.
I love how this channel explains the topics so scientifically yet extremely enjoyable because of the memes that fits perfectly into it. Love this channel
But the iceberg itself isn't an explanation and not all questions have multiple levels of complexity. This is better thought of as a way to breakdown either complex topics or a way to group related items on some defined spectrum.
1:49 it feels wierd to hear a really normal unit of measurement to describe a subatomic particle, but I guess that's what you get when you combine a really small mass with a really high energy level
@@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman well duh, that's obvious. I'm pretty sure Sciencephile is "smarter" than us (as arbitrary as that word is). Unless, you mean that Sciencephile lives in a higher level of intelligence than us (he does). If so, then that's a terrible way to word it.
I guess that the many worlds explanation kind of goes beyond the saying that usually the least complicated or over the top explanation is the best, and the Copenhagen one just says "we just don't know"
Fun thing is if protons DO decay, and if they do so in a certain time frame, then the redshift we see may be causing an illusion of the universe expansion and acceleration, so it may not be happening the way we think or at all, as very young protons would be "more red." So the light we get from the early universe being red might have less to do with the doppler effect and more to do with that.
That wouldn't add up. While we might not know weither protons do decay eventually, we were able to determine a lower limit if they do. And this lower limit is already waaaaaaay too long to result in such a mechanism. We are talking about many orders of magnitude too long.
@@AliothAncalagon no. In this scenario, we wouldn't know how old it is. It could have no beginning. There's nothing that requires the universe to have an age. The only reason that "science" thinks that it does is because of expansion, which is based on a lot of assumptions. But there's other possibilities and our information is limited by what we can see. It would be unscientific to just assume that the standard model is correct and to not explore any other possibilities whatsoever. The way you get annoyed and kind of hostile whenever someone even suggests something else is very odd.
@@Velereonics Why is it hostile to explain why your claims don't add up? If you don't like the current position of science then nobody is stopping you to come up with a new one. But just making random claims that don't really fit together is not going to be a convincing alternative.
@@andrewacacia9851 AI is already a lot smarter than us in a lot of fields. For example, AI discovered about a hundred or so forms of protein when we had only discovered approximately 7 to 12 types of protein. Don't quote me on the numbers.
@@andrewacacia9851 Wait until we get a AGI that can make advancements of itself to increase it's intelligence. After that, It's intelligent would be so high that it would be no different than a God to us, you should watch his video about singularity
6:36 fun fact: the Ukrainian band "Okean Elzy" has made an album called "Supersymmetry" and one of the songs is "Susy" also the leadsinger of the band Sviatoslav Vakarchuk was a theoretical physics student and earned a Ph.D in the field of - you guess it - supersymmetry. Also he is the first guy to ever win the Ukrainian version of "Who wants to be a millionaire?" And there is a high chance that you already heard one of his songs because "Obiymy" trended on Tik Tok and You Tube and has hundreds of millions of views.
Hey, can you do a video on the double slit experiment and explain what instrument is used to observe the photons. I have seen a bunch of videos which says that the interference pattern disappears as soon as we observe the particles but noone explains how we observe them. I would really love some insight into that because it's a really intriguing and interesting experiment. I really hope you read this
stop your videos are so fun to watch. im a senior comp sci undergrad and engineering grad student, but ive been looking for shit to do my capstone (senior thesis basically) mixing comp sci and physics. you gave me so many options so when i fijish my project i’ll be sure to use you as my main source lol
I like the idea that dark energy and the expansion of the universe might speed up right before vacuum decay and that the early expansion of the universe slowed with decay and so will our expansion.
The theory also postulates that the points where bubbles of decay met trapped all the particles that would not exist in our current vacuum and they exist in gravity as dark matter points.
Wouldnt the neutron lifetime puzzle just be due to special relativity? The moving particles experience the world around them faster than the ones in the container.
The Great Science Rap at 5:14 has a beginning so simmilar to a part of Tom Lehrers song 'When You Are Old and Grey', that I highly doubt it is just a coincidence, and Sciencephile might've gotten some inspiration from there.
Man how do you find out about all these things and how long do you take to understand each concept? Just hearing about these makes my head spin but I do understand everything you say because you break it down to simplicity.
Thanks for making this video, it has given me what might've been the remaining inspirational impulse towards a potential breakthrough in resolving how photons can have an impulse, kinetic energy despite 0 rest mass, and neutrinos' & quarks' oscillations, a potential underlying cause of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, and maybe even also compatibility of violations of Bell's inequality without giving up the law of locality, as well as the double-slit experiment's interference pattern that applies for baryonic matter. The idea would be based on the kinetic energy of particles in general to consist of the (in its energy balance between the summands variable, fluctuating) sum of 2 separate components, namely a mass-based summand contributing to the total kinetic energy of a particle, together with a wavelength-based summand contributing to it, too. In this scenario, E_kin(photon) = 0*c^2 + h*f (and analogously as concept extended to all kinds of particles). Neutrinos might then not be oscillating in flavor, but this could be a mis-interpretation of a different process going on, namely fluctuations in the value or amount of each energy component summand, in which the variable value of the associated wavelength-based kinetic energy component were to determine the probability or ability of a neutrino to interact with matter, just like how the corresponding wavelength of particles generally seems to be the criterion on which their ability for particle interactions depends on.
Correction : The universe does not have an inclination to increase entropy. A brain has more connections in a slice of the universe with higher entropy. So the second law of thermodynamics is just about our perception of time.
I didnt understand any of that, and if you asked me to explain this video, i could only say, my favorite AI explaining stuff using the iceburg method, BUT i still LOVED the video and am giving it a like!
Sciencephile Senpai, as a meaningless earth worm flesh pig floating in space, I have always been interested in some of our most dangerous experiments through out history. Could you make one in the trusted iceberg format as a playful reminder of our moth to the flame appreciation of danger?
bro i have been watching u since ur 100k subs and my acc got banned now i see u again tysm for making me pass my science test ily sm man without u idk in science i wouldve gotten like 20 percent loll
GZK Paradox is just a proof that it is possible to go FTL without "cheats" like space-bending, infinite energy or hyperspace, we just don't know how yet.
As best we know, time is like other fundamental forces in that we can say we know how it operates under typical circumstances. The evidence that it may not behave quite so neatly under extreme circumstances is fairly compelling
Your videos are not as easy to understand as they used to be 10-15 videos back Edit: I'm saying this as someone who has seen every single video, never missed one + have liked them all
There's a significant theory that contests dark matter/energy in the form of the electromagnetic universe, or even plasmonics, both of which are extant and visible as opposed to hidden and esoteric. Curious that dark matter/energy are practically religious (and entirely hidden), whereas very few in the general populace grant credence to centripetal motion, electromagnetism and thermodynamics (all of which we actively see and experience). It's the exact same sentiment that drives dogma. Rupert Sheldrake's most popular lectures are on this very dichotomy, in fact.
wouldn't the difference in neutron life decay time between 878 and 888 be due to how faster moving objects perceive time slower? so the duration of the wave method would be longer due to them being able to move faster when not being contained? although that probably isn't the case i am still curious if it would have much of an influence on the results
Yeah, we've had a pretty good understanding of relativistic time and accelerated particles since the study of muon lifespans. So it would be something taken into account. Neutron decay comes down to how quarks behave when subjected to quantum forces outside of the protective bubble of atomic electromagnetism. They study this to better understand how other quark compositions should behave by using neutrons as a basis for the up and down quarks.
The idea of magnetic monopoles arises from a pseudo-symmetry in Maxwell's Equations. Maxwell's Equations use the "cross-product" which is a chiral algebraic operator; that is, it lacks P symmetry. When Maxwell's Equations are written in relativistic form, the pseudo-symmetry disappears, and magnetic fields are seen to be exactly what they are: electric fields viewed from moving coordinate systems. QED.
When there are voiceovers on UA-cam done by AI, videos are boring, and just a cheap fast way of getting content up that most of the time is full of useless information or we’ve all heard 1 million times before. This is not one of those channels. This voiceover fits the character talks throughout the videos. The character is lovable. The information is interesting. The overall structure of all the videos on this channel are very, very enjoyable, and a great experience from beginning to end. Even the humor put in is fun. I’m not rolling my eyes, I’m actually laughing and it’s hard to make me laugh. I love this. I always come back to this channel just to hear more monotone AI telling me about Skynet and space and how I am a mortal and it’s just so much fun. This is what people need to learn from this kind of a channel. That AI voice verse should be like this, they should be part of the character and personality of the video instead of just a cheap way to get things up fast . This is why I love this channel so much. And I will always come back for more.
Science nerds: Maybe one day science will figure out how general relativity and quantum physics can work together. Religious fundamentalists: "👆🤓 Maybe one day science will discover the ice bridge between Eurasia and Australia/Arctic"
Technically there are some formulas that say things don't work if the arrow of time went the other way. But this gets cancelled out if you apply parity, resulting in the CP law. And then that has its own problems, which then result in the CPT law which so far hasn't been violated thankfully.
The laws of physics are not time symmetric. GR doesn't conserve energy (cosmic redshift, expansion) and is therefore not reversible. And QFT has CPT as an unbroken symmetry, so if CP is broken, T (time) must also be broken.
For the time problem, what if we just actively perceive the world going forward. Time may be stagnant, but we are living in the past, or the future. It is impossible tell as we are three dimensional beings.
GZK assumes that the cosmic ray particles are protons; measurements have shown that most ultra high energy cosmic rays are heavier ions, so the limit isn't being violated.
When you take a break from all these overwhelming physics mysteries, play War Thunder for free and get an awesome starting bonus pack with vehicles, boosters, and more at playwt.link/sciencephiletheai
thanks
I am the devourer of balls.
guys i am looking for amanda huginkiss do any of you know where i can find amanda huginkiss
Finally lord sciencephile posts again
I love ❤ sciencephiletheai
"the strong CP problem" is one of, if not the most unfortunate naming I've seen be given to anything ever
My god they abbreviated Cyberpunk 😨
give me some of that garbage cod points.
child po- ... never mind
@@IvarTheBoneless77 lmao
It seems Science and Hollywood have some things in common.
You know shit is about to get fucked up when the tip of the iceberg is why does time move forward
😂😂😂😂😂😂
indubitably
The bottom is when you realize we dont know how lighting and ice skates work because the physicists were to busy looking for the higgs bosson
@@Hamburgerhumaneven deeper is when you realize we do know how lightning and ice skates work, but we don’t understand the reasons as to why those processes work (and we probably never will)
🥶🥶🥶🥶
Small note: We don't actually know if the interior of a black hole has a singularity or not. Usually, singularities indicate problems with the physics equations being used, so there's probably something else going on.
Planck stars are an alternative theory against a black hole with a singularity.
On of my favourite conjectures is black hole cosmology: in Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates, the singularity connects the black hole interior with a white hole interior (from which all world lines diverge), which can be interpreted as black holes producing a universe in its interior, which by extension could mean our universe is the interior of a black hole and we we would exist in a long evolutionary process of black holes creating black holes, each universe condensing in a difference state with slight variations in for example couplings, particles etc
@@sebastianjovancic9814there’s some interesting parallels between the hot dense particle soup beginning of our universe and what a singularity might actually be. Would be pretty trippy to imagine everything nested witching black holes. But how would phenomenon like hawking radiation and expansion come into play?
blacholes are joining point of anitmater and mater universe
We don't even know for sure weither black holes even have an interior in the first place.
Every property of a black hole is "stored" in its event horizon.
The common saying that everything inside a black hole is not really part of this universe anymore could be true in a more literal sense than many people anticipated.
I love how this channel explains the topics so scientifically yet extremely enjoyable because of the memes that fits perfectly into it. Love this channel
With great ability and unfragility
how about you play some war thunder to balance it out
Its really really interesting
Can we all agree that the iceberg chart is the best explanation to any question?
But the iceberg itself isn't an explanation and not all questions have multiple levels of complexity. This is better thought of as a way to breakdown either complex topics or a way to group related items on some defined spectrum.
@@mattb4251 valid response ✅
i love iceberg vids, there’s always a layer of mystery to subjects i wouldn’t even be think to be mysterious
Iceberg Chart best frfr
It's not an explanation itself but it's the best tool that can be used to explain stuff
thank you for plugging me into the matrix and injecting all of this knowledge into my head in such an efficient way that I have become beyond sentient
sciencephile "the AI" is actually just a human editing videos, its not actually an AI
@@Litkeen... are you joking? i hope you are because literally everyone knows that.
@@Litkeenno way, i never knew that
*me watching the multi-universal versions of myself through my mind*
It seems you're beyond punctuation too...
🙄
🍄
Honestly didn’t know CP was such a big problem thanks man 💯
😨
@@w花byou really think there's only 1 cp website?
@@_Rainbooowclub penguin
@@_Rainbooowbro knows ☠️
@@gabrieldelatortilla1it's easily findable if you know some asian languages like chinese/japenese, have tor installed and some bitcoin
1:49 it feels wierd to hear a really normal unit of measurement to describe a subatomic particle, but I guess that's what you get when you combine a really small mass with a really high energy level
Weird
mmmm nerd words and nerd science, me brain is dopamined
Sub atomic particles aren’t real
@@spimblesthis is a nerd channel dummas
how are there 3 hidden replies to me LMFAOOOO
5:20 damn bro can rhyme.
With some killer beats this can turn into a bomb music video.
Sciencephile is hands down my favorite space channel here on UA-cam
Why I enjoy watching your videos while having a zero understanding more than half of it? Love your icebergs!
Its almost like we're listening to a higher intelligence
Oh wait we are
@@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman well duh, that's obvious.
I'm pretty sure Sciencephile is "smarter" than us (as arbitrary as that word is).
Unless, you mean that Sciencephile lives in a higher level of intelligence than us (he does). If so, then that's a terrible way to word it.
@@CalvinNoiremeh, you could invert the iceberg and it would make as much sense
That proton decay rap is hysterical. Just the way it comes out of nowhere with no warning or particular reason. Sciencephile never disappoints haha
I guess that the many worlds explanation kind of goes beyond the saying that usually the least complicated or over the top explanation is the best, and the Copenhagen one just says "we just don't know"
"Problems such as children and taxes"
finally someone understands. Bro was low-key rapping at 5:13
Mom: Why is your room so messy always?
Me : Oh it's just entropy
I mean it's actually the reason why it gets messy in the first place
Bro
The deepest mystery for me is how did an AI has a human mother who beliefs in pseudo science 🤔🤔🤔
His programmer was into weirdos
Fun thing is if protons DO decay, and if they do so in a certain time frame, then the redshift we see may be causing an illusion of the universe expansion and acceleration, so it may not be happening the way we think or at all, as very young protons would be "more red." So the light we get from the early universe being red might have less to do with the doppler effect and more to do with that.
That wouldn't add up.
While we might not know weither protons do decay eventually, we were able to determine a lower limit if they do.
And this lower limit is already waaaaaaay too long to result in such a mechanism.
We are talking about many orders of magnitude too long.
There can't be "too long" in that scenario though, because that concept relies on estimating the universe's age via expansion. @@AliothAncalagon
@@Velereonics So your idea relies on the claim that the universe is actually a trillion times older than science says it is?
@@AliothAncalagon no. In this scenario, we wouldn't know how old it is. It could have no beginning. There's nothing that requires the universe to have an age. The only reason that "science" thinks that it does is because of expansion, which is based on a lot of assumptions.
But there's other possibilities and our information is limited by what we can see. It would be unscientific to just assume that the standard model is correct and to not explore any other possibilities whatsoever.
The way you get annoyed and kind of hostile whenever someone even suggests something else is very odd.
@@Velereonics Why is it hostile to explain why your claims don't add up?
If you don't like the current position of science then nobody is stopping you to come up with a new one.
But just making random claims that don't really fit together is not going to be a convincing alternative.
I love the iceberg format, keep doing them, I'll watch them all
Perhaps with the assistance of AI like Sciencefile, we could solve them in many generations.
But that would mean that the Ai is a lot smarter than us and we all know how that usually ends...
@@andrewacacia9851 we don't even need said AN ai to be smart in other fields of science.
We could have multiple specialised AI for each field.
@@andrewacacia9851 AI is already a lot smarter than us in a lot of fields. For example, AI discovered about a hundred or so forms of protein when we had only discovered approximately 7 to 12 types of protein. Don't quote me on the numbers.
@@andrewacacia9851 Wait until we get a AGI that can make advancements of itself to increase it's intelligence. After that, It's intelligent would be so high that it would be no different than a God to us, you should watch his video about singularity
It's the Sophon AIs stopping us from solving these problems in the first place.
5:13 If I don't see you on URL next week they're missing out!
BARS 🔥🔥
3:49 Oh they found a new violation of what exactly?
Yo I was listening to this while cleaning and istg I stopped everything and walked across the room to rewind that part😭
Half-Life 2 moment
Must say this is easily my favorite channel on youtube. Mr AI please never stop making videos
"just like extroverts when they get home"
You hit me hard there bro.
6:36 fun fact: the Ukrainian band "Okean Elzy" has made an album called "Supersymmetry" and one of the songs is "Susy" also the leadsinger of the band Sviatoslav Vakarchuk was a theoretical physics student and earned a Ph.D in the field of - you guess it - supersymmetry. Also he is the first guy to ever win the Ukrainian version of "Who wants to be a millionaire?"
And there is a high chance that you already heard one of his songs because "Obiymy" trended on Tik Tok and You Tube and has hundreds of millions of views.
That's cool
He's also a traitor who helped Zelensky rise to power by siphoning votes away from Poroshenko.
прикольно
Normal youtubers: Welcome to the Space iceberg.
Sciencephile: *H E L L O M O R T A L S*
3:10 That cosmic string animation with a harp made my mind produce dopamine for some reason
it's time to stop abbreviating things as "CP"
It’s funny
@@gimmepenalty true!
So true, we need better names
But I like cheese pizza 🍕
(like the actual food, not the evil euphemism)
who cares
Hey, can you do a video on the double slit experiment and explain what instrument is used to observe the photons. I have seen a bunch of videos which says that the interference pattern disappears as soon as we observe the particles but noone explains how we observe them. I would really love some insight into that because it's a really intriguing and interesting experiment. I really hope you read this
stop your videos are so fun to watch. im a senior comp sci undergrad and engineering grad student, but ive been looking for shit to do my capstone (senior thesis basically) mixing comp sci and physics. you gave me so many options so when i fijish my project i’ll be sure to use you as my main source lol
quantum measurement problem sounds just like fable 3's magic mirror "it makes you beautiful when you look in it, but only works in complete darkness"
I like the idea that dark energy and the expansion of the universe might speed up right before vacuum decay and that the early expansion of the universe slowed with decay and so will our expansion.
The theory also postulates that the points where bubbles of decay met trapped all the particles that would not exist in our current vacuum and they exist in gravity as dark matter points.
I’m so glad people are passionate about physics. I hope they keep going at it strong!
damn, the editing in your videos have become so slick and creative lately. can't wait for the next one
Wouldnt the neutron lifetime puzzle just be due to special relativity? The moving particles experience the world around them faster than the ones in the container.
0:33 don't do that to me, I've watched titanic yesterday for the first time and I cried my eyes out
9:04 ah yes the only person able to see a singularity - of course, the cameraman!
The Great Science Rap at 5:14 has a beginning so simmilar to a part of Tom Lehrers song 'When You Are Old and Grey', that I highly doubt it is just a coincidence, and Sciencephile might've gotten some inspiration from there.
20:20-20:45 is a generational banger of a meme
The vine boom at 3:51 bro 😭😭😭
“Superposition of their opinions has not collapsed yet.” 😂🤣😂 love it!!!
Man how do you find out about all these things and how long do you take to understand each concept? Just hearing about these makes my head spin but I do understand everything you say because you break it down to simplicity.
The writing and editing on these videos are second to none. I did not see that epic rap coming at all. Just brilliant.
18:24 no fucking way guys its a geometry dash reference in science!1!!!!!!111!!1!1!!1!!11!!!
Holy shit no way
the true vacuum decay might already have begun and we wouldnt even know it.
like..it would start at the exact center of this universe bubble.
right?
WE MAKING IT OUT OF SKYNET HEADQUARTERS WITH THIS ONE🔥🔥🔥🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶5:15🔥🔥🔥
alright looks like im gonna have to step in and figure this out
Honestly one of your most interesting videos imo
Thanks for making this video, it has given me what might've been the remaining inspirational impulse towards a potential breakthrough in resolving how photons can have an impulse, kinetic energy despite 0 rest mass, and neutrinos' & quarks' oscillations, a potential underlying cause of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, and maybe even also compatibility of violations of Bell's inequality without giving up the law of locality, as well as the double-slit experiment's interference pattern that applies for baryonic matter. The idea would be based on the kinetic energy of particles in general to consist of the (in its energy balance between the summands variable, fluctuating) sum of 2 separate components, namely a mass-based summand contributing to the total kinetic energy of a particle, together with a wavelength-based summand contributing to it, too. In this scenario, E_kin(photon) = 0*c^2 + h*f (and analogously as concept extended to all kinds of particles). Neutrinos might then not be oscillating in flavor, but this could be a mis-interpretation of a different process going on, namely fluctuations in the value or amount of each energy component summand, in which the variable value of the associated wavelength-based kinetic energy component were to determine the probability or ability of a neutrino to interact with matter, just like how the corresponding wavelength of particles generally seems to be the criterion on which their ability for particle interactions depends on.
i was on the edge of my seat for that whole comment....why did it end NOOOOOO (っ˘з(˘⌣˘ )
You’re the best science channel out there!! Thanks for your wonderful work.
Man, the video game and meme references in your videos really help me put things into perspective.
This field of energy we’ve created is cool lol
2:13 comparisons like these are what make me absolutely adore subatomic science, this shit is so mindblowing lol
21 minutes video from this A.I is the greatest mystery in physics
I was prepped to be mind blown, but not for the Sciencephile rap... Jesus Christ, you absolutely sweeped me off my feet with that one
Correction : The universe does not have an inclination to increase entropy. A brain has more connections in a slice of the universe with higher entropy. So the second law of thermodynamics is just about our perception of time.
I didnt understand any of that, and if you asked me to explain this video, i could only say, my favorite AI explaining stuff using the iceburg method, BUT i still LOVED the video and am giving it a like!
20:27
Physics theories generating unhelpful infinities will never not be funny
i recently discovered this channel and i have to say your iceberg videos are my fav
Idk why i watch every video this guy makes when i have zero idea wtf is going on the entire time
At 4:29, but the extroverts thing is so true. And its totally opposite to introverts who have the exact opposite.
Its 4:13
Watsching this while getting drunk after my parents yelled at me😎
Sciencephile Senpai, as a meaningless earth worm flesh pig floating in space, I have always been interested in some of our most dangerous experiments through out history. Could you make one in the trusted iceberg format as a playful reminder of our moth to the flame appreciation of danger?
No because the lower bound of the halflife of the proton is really high.
Just think, no matter how wrong you got an answer on a test, it is probably 115+ orders of magnitude more accurate than the vacuum catastrophe 😌
Sciencephile and the Oppenheimer movie are the only two things that are making physics cool asf.
Another good iceberg video 🤖🦾
I mean, psychics is cool af by itself
Physics is simultaneously the coolest and most boring thing to ever exist
bro i have been watching u since ur 100k subs and my acc got banned now i see u again tysm for making me pass my science test ily sm man without u idk in science i wouldve gotten like 20 percent loll
Gotta watch those CP violations
GZK Paradox is just a proof that it is possible to go FTL without "cheats" like space-bending, infinite energy or hyperspace, we just don't know how yet.
The universe itself is the only naked singularity we know of. So in theory, to observe a naked singularity you have to already be a part of it.
Had a bad trip and couldn’t watch these vids for a long time, glad to be back tho
That rap was so fire 🔥 it melted my brain from not being able to comprehend it. Ima need some more.
As best we know, time is like other fundamental forces in that we can say we know how it operates under typical circumstances. The evidence that it may not behave quite so neatly under extreme circumstances is fairly compelling
Laying here trying to go to bed and put this on and am almost pissing myself laughing at the memes lol. Got my sub!
Your videos are not as easy to understand as they used to be 10-15 videos back
Edit: I'm saying this as someone who has seen every single video, never missed one + have liked them all
5:43 you’re worried about particles that have almost 1.66x10^10 MOLES of years.
There's a significant theory that contests dark matter/energy in the form of the electromagnetic universe, or even plasmonics, both of which are extant and visible as opposed to hidden and esoteric. Curious that dark matter/energy are practically religious (and entirely hidden), whereas very few in the general populace grant credence to centripetal motion, electromagnetism and thermodynamics (all of which we actively see and experience). It's the exact same sentiment that drives dogma. Rupert Sheldrake's most popular lectures are on this very dichotomy, in fact.
wouldn't the difference in neutron life decay time between 878 and 888 be due to how faster moving objects perceive time slower? so the duration of the wave method would be longer due to them being able to move faster when not being contained? although that probably isn't the case i am still curious if it would have much of an influence on the results
i doubt stuff like this isnt included in the calculations
Yeah, we've had a pretty good understanding of relativistic time and accelerated particles since the study of muon lifespans. So it would be something taken into account.
Neutron decay comes down to how quarks behave when subjected to quantum forces outside of the protective bubble of atomic electromagnetism.
They study this to better understand how other quark compositions should behave by using neutrons as a basis for the up and down quarks.
The idea of magnetic monopoles arises from a pseudo-symmetry in Maxwell's Equations. Maxwell's Equations use the "cross-product" which is a chiral algebraic operator; that is, it lacks P symmetry.
When Maxwell's Equations are written in relativistic form, the pseudo-symmetry disappears, and magnetic fields are seen to be exactly what they are: electric fields viewed from moving coordinate systems. QED.
15:34
Sciencephile : Universe hostile to life as we know it
Shows pictures of aliens and MaRK ZuCKeRbUrg
When there are voiceovers on UA-cam done by AI, videos are boring, and just a cheap fast way of getting content up that most of the time is full of useless information or we’ve all heard 1 million times before. This is not one of those channels. This voiceover fits the character talks throughout the videos. The character is lovable. The information is interesting. The overall structure of all the videos on this channel are very, very enjoyable, and a great experience from beginning to end. Even the humor put in is fun. I’m not rolling my eyes, I’m actually laughing and it’s hard to make me laugh. I love this. I always come back to this channel just to hear more monotone AI telling me about Skynet and space and how I am a mortal and it’s just so much fun. This is what people need to learn from this kind of a channel. That AI voice verse should be like this, they should be part of the character and personality of the video instead of just a cheap way to get things up fast . This is why I love this channel so much. And I will always come back for more.
Thanks mortal.
Why the sudden increase in brightness / saturation of our fav AI?
The editing, the explanation the detail it’s genius it’s da Vinci …I want you
Science nerds: Maybe one day science will figure out how general relativity and quantum physics can work together.
Religious fundamentalists: "👆🤓 Maybe one day science will discover the ice bridge between Eurasia and Australia/Arctic"
sciencephile is like the best science channel ever
You know its a good day when skynet uploads.
Technically there are some formulas that say things don't work if the arrow of time went the other way.
But this gets cancelled out if you apply parity, resulting in the CP law.
And then that has its own problems, which then result in the CPT law which so far hasn't been violated thankfully.
9:41 Bro slaps the black hole like it was his bitch 😂
How the hell is this free?
Watching this drunk was a mistake
Thanks for the heads up, I took another swig and almost downloaded among us…. Fugg it, I’m gonna finish this video then play until I forget I’m sad 😅
Yeah, and don't try it on weed either 🤣
I smoked my scotch today with oak wood. First time doing that haha. Pretty, Raw lol.
@@FreelancerFreak 🤣🤣🤣
Yoooo a new video from our favorite computer
i like to pretend i understand what hes saying
If you’re going into any science or engineering field you’ll start to understand a lil bit of what he’s saying
😂 it's ok, I only understand roughly 65%
The laws of physics are not time symmetric. GR doesn't conserve energy (cosmic redshift, expansion) and is therefore not reversible. And QFT has CPT as an unbroken symmetry, so if CP is broken, T (time) must also be broken.
Why are scientists so good at naming things?😭
Do you know that the fps of the universe is 1 fps per 10^256 earth years? But for us, it doesn't feel that way as we are part of that render.
Never thought an ai voice TTS channel would get nearly 1 million subs wow.
For the time problem, what if we just actively perceive the world going forward. Time may be stagnant, but we are living in the past, or the future. It is impossible tell as we are three dimensional beings.
5:09 the most epic rap ever lmao
i love how the music get louder after every topic
If protons are stable,....that's a punch in the GUT.
GZK assumes that the cosmic ray particles are protons; measurements have shown that most ultra high energy cosmic rays are heavier ions, so the limit isn't being violated.
7:07 Wait.. The strong WHAT problem⁉️
You heard the AI
Half-Life 2 moment